o{]:¬)

Fr. Z is Moderator of the Catholic Online Forum and the ASK FATHER Question Box. The WDTPRS columns appear weekly in The Wanderer. Fr. Z lives in Rome, though he is often in the USA. He is available for retreats and conferences. E-mail


   Fr. Z on WDTPRS

↑ Grab this Headline Animator


Recent Posts
  • MINI MOVIE REVIEW: Prince Caspain
  • Prayer request - ordination
  • Am I blue? You'd be too ... were you a Passerina cyanea
  • WDTPRS: Trinity Sunday
  • Octave of Pentecost PODCAzTs
  • PODCAzT 60: Pentecost customs; St. Ambrose on the dew of the Holy Spirit
  • Let's get the famous quote right, please?
  • New Sabine guest! Oooo ... look at the colors

  • Recent Comments:

    • elizabeth mckernan: Some of these comments remind me of the old joke:- = Where did you get the idea for your new...
    • Mark M: Gosh; doesn’t sound like the book! Father: if you want the definitive Chronicles of Narnia, then watch...
    • GOR: Great pictures Father! Yes, the Cowbirds are unfazed by any other visitors and if you get a few of them at once,...
    • boredoftheworld: Classically, I can handle my kids watching pg-13 violence, but not pg-13 sex; you liberals will have...
    • John: The difference between the two is striking; most notably in that they ask for totally different things. The old...

  • Visit the new WDTPRS Store!
    Buy WDTPRS stuff!

    Click below and vote !My site was nominated for Best Religion Blog!


    Calendar


    The Pilgrimage

    Subscribe to ...
    The Wanderer

    Subscribe to ... The Catholic Herald - UK






    This blog is hosted by

    Joyent


    Thanks for the support!


























    WINNER of...

    The 2007 Weblog Awards

















    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Add to Google Reader or Homepage

    Add to My AOL

    Subscribe in Bloglines

    Powered by FeedBurner

    3 March 2006

    Can a US bishop censor a priest? The Law.

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 5:45 pm

    MicrophoneCANONICAL SCHOLION:

    Canon 831—§2. “It is for the conference of bishops to establish norms concerning the requirements for clerics and members of religious institutes to take part on radio or television in dealing with questions of Catholic doctrine or morals.”

    NCCB Complementary Norm for Canon 831 §2:

    “The National Conference of Catholic Bishops, in accord with the prescriptions of canon 831 §2, hereby decrees that, provided no harm to the Church could result from their presence, clerics and members of religious institutes may participate in radio and television programs which treat of Catholic doctrine and morals. A cleric or religious who regularly takes part in such programs must be qualified by his or her knowledge of the subject and the teaching of the magisterium, and must obtain the permission of either his or her proper diocesan bishop or the diocesan bishop of the place where the radio or television program is originally broadcast. In the case of members of religious institutes, permission of the competent superior is also required.”

    This norm was granted recognitio by the Congregation for Bishops in accord with article 82 of the Apostolic Constitution Pastor Bonus and issued by decree of the Congregation for Bishops signed by His Eminence Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, Prefect, and His Excellency Most Reverend Franciscus Monterisi, Secretary, and dated November 27, 2001.

    There are quite a few ambiguous terms in the US bishops’ norm, which could result in the violation of basic rights of members of the Catholic faithful to be free from being hindered. In any event, this norm is so wide that it would give the right to a diocesan bishop to hinder a cleric from saying nearly anything in an radio or television broadcast provided that he is broadcast or disseminated more than once.

    • • • • • •

    Friday after Ash Wednesday

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM, WDTPRS — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 9:54 am

    Christ fasting in the wildernessCOLLECT:
    Inchoata paenitentiae opera, quaesumus, Domine,
    benigno favore prosequere,
    ut observantiam, quam corporaliter exercemus,
    mentibus etiam valeamus implere sinceris.

    An observantia is "an obedient observance; a keeping, following, performing of laws, customs" which also has a juridical/religious over tone: "an observance of religious duties, divine worship, religion".  The Theodosian Code uses observantia in this sense, as does the Vulgate.  So, we will need to insert an adverb of some sort to get at the concept of duty inherent in the technical term.  Sincerus, a, um, is "clean, pure, sound, not spoiled, uninjured, whole, entire, real, natural, genuine, sincere ".  It points to a wholeness and incorrupt character, rather than just "sincere", which in English hints at an earnest state of believing you are in the right.  It is more onotological than subjective, in other words.  The complicated mens can be "the mind, disposition; the heart, soul".  Futhermore, it means, "the conscience".  I think in this prayer, given its age, and the juridical tone in observantia, we need to maintain the rational end of the spectrum of mens rather than the affective.  Also, since sincerus is not to be taken in the English sense, but rather the Latin, I think we can move away from mens as "conscience".  Let’s go with rational dimension of the word and grasp onto "the intellectual faculties, the mind, understanding, intellect, reason, judgment, discernment, consideration, reflection" which logically leads us to another meaning of mens as "mind, thought, plan, purpose, intention, design".  Think of an English phrase like, "What do you have in mind?" or "I will tell you my mind, by and by."  Here is another interesting thing.  Incohatus, a, um is an adjective from incoho, avi, atum.  As an adjective inchohatus is "only begun (as oppose to finished, completed), unfinished, incomplete, imperfect".  I think that must be the meaning in our prayer, though we will play with this below.

    A FIRST STAB AT A LITERAL TRANSLATION:
    O Lord, we beseech You, follow up with kind good will
    on the works of penance which have just commenced,
    so that we may be able to fulfill dutifully the religious observance
    which we are now carrying out corporally also with sound consideration.

    Sure, if you want you can do it this way:

    ANOTHER LITERAL VERSION:
    O Lord, we beseech You, follow up with benevolent favor
    on the works of penance which are not yet completed,
    with the result that we may be strong to complete properly the religious practices  
    which we are now engaged in bodily also with clean conscience.

    If you want to go the affective route with the prayer we might do it this way:

    A MORE AFFECTIVE RENDERING:
    We beg, O Lord, that you in friendship accompany
    the works of penance just recently started,
    in order that we may be able to complete also with pure hearts
    the religious practice which we are now employed in physically.

    Okay, let’s see if we can take a stand on a

    WDTPRS VERSION:
    We beseech You, O Lord, kindly accompany
    the works of penance which have just begun,
    so that we may have the strength to discharge also with mind and heart
    the religious observance we are now carrying out physically.

    And now a real treat.  I wish we could pray this way all the time. 

    AN ELEGANT OLD FASHIONED VERSION WHICH I REALLY REALLY LIKE
    We beseech thee, O Lord, to further with thy gracious favour
    the fast, which we have here begun:
    that we, who with our bodies therein do thee outward worship,
    may inwardly perform the same in singleness of heart.

    Whew!  This is like doing Latin crunches: One is a piece of cake, but do enough of them and you really start feeling which muscles are getting the work.

    What would ICEL do?    I don’t have the ICEL text with me right, so I will guess:

    EXTREME LAME DUCK ICELese
    God,
    you are very nice.
    Keep up the good work.
    Be a friend and help us
    to think and do nice things too.

    • • • • • •
    Powered by: Luke 5:1-11 and WordPress