o{]:¬)

Fr. Z is Moderator of the Catholic Online Forum and the ASK FATHER Question Box. The WDTPRS columns appear weekly in The Wanderer. Fr. Z lives in Rome, though he is often in the USA. He is available for retreats and conferences. E-mail
LOGIN


   Fr. Z on WDTPRS

↑ Grab this Headline Animator


Recent Posts
  • GUEST CONTRIBUTION: Q&A with the Pont. Comm. Ecclesia Dei about SSPX, schism and sacraments
  • CNS recap of the SSPX/Vatican dialogue
  • Workin' on the blog
  • Archbp. Caroll's Prayer for Government
  • Aphelion!
  • From the "Your kidding, right?" files: NCR - Community supports St. Louis sister
  • QUAERITUR: Post your WDTPRS pieces earlier in the week?
  • SSPX-UK: Letter of District Superior for JULY

  • Recent Comments:

    • Tim Ferguson: Actually, the marriage of members of the PNC before a judge would NOT be considered valid. nor would...
    • Dan: Interesting article.
    • S.K.: Ttony has a valid point to which, not surprisingly, no one responded: Brian Mershon explicitly stated (more...
    • JM: Valentino, The SSPX arguments for supplied jurisdiction are dangerous. They are the PRIVATE OPINION of the SSPX....
    • Indignant Canonist: Ferguson, incredible reasoning for a canonist. The marriage of schismatics (like the Polish NC)...

  • Visit the new WDTPRS Store!
    Buy WDTPRS stuff!

    Click below and vote !My site was nominated for Best Religion Blog!


    Calendar


    The Pilgrimage

    Subscribe to ...
    The Wanderer

    Subscribe to ... The Catholic Herald - UK






    This blog is hosted by

    Joyent


    Thanks for the support!


























    WINNER of...

    The 2007 Weblog Awards

















    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Add to Google Reader or Homepage

    Add to My AOL

    Subscribe in Bloglines

    Powered by FeedBurner

    17 May 2006

    DaVinci Bomb

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 2:08 pm

    I hear the movie is risible.

    This from the NY Daily News.

    Some quotes:

    Most offered only lukewarm praise or shrugs of indifference.

    Others laughed or jeered at parts of the nearly 2-1/2-hour thriller and dumped on star Tom Hanks’ performance as well as what they called a potboiler script.  ... "Nothing really works. It’s not suspenseful. It’s not romantic. It’s certainly not fun," according to Stephen Schaefer of the Boston Herald. ... The Cannes audience of critics – arguably the toughest in the world – clearly grew restless as the movie dragged on to a long sequence of anticlimactic revelations. ..."I kept thinking of the Energizer Bunny, because it kept going and going and going, and not in a good way," said James Rocchi, a film critic for CBS 5 television in San Francisco. ...One especially melodramatic line uttered by Hanks drew prolonged laughter and some catcalls, and the audience continued to titter for much of the film’s remainder.

     

    I am going to rush out and see this one! 

    • • • • • •

    Wednesday in the 5th Week of Easter

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM, WDTPRS — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 9:26 am

    COLLECT:
    Deus, innocentiae restitutor et amator,
    dirige ad te tuorum corda famulorum,
    ut, quos de incredulitatis tenebris liberasti,
    numquam a tuae veritatis luce discedant.

    In the Gelasian Sacramentary this appeared on Saturday of the Octave of Easter.  However, The Redactors changed infidelitatis to incredulitatis.  A little "p.c." touch there, perhaps, and I don’t mean "post communionem".

    LITERAL VERSION:
    O God, restorer and lover of innocence,
    direct the hearts of your servants toward You,
    that, those whom you freed from the shadows of religious disbelief
    may never deviate from the light of Your truth.

    Obviously, incredulitas or "religious disbelief" as the superb Lewis & Short Dictionary reveals, could apply to just about any religion, and even more obviously in the context of this Collect the religion in question is Christianity.  Given the antiquity of this prayer, the original word infidelitas was a shot at the Jews and pagans still wandering in the shadows of errors.  

    Let us not forget the document Dominus Iesus issued from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith over the signature of Cardinal Ratzinger in 2000.  Here is a nice part:

    22.  With the coming of the Saviour Jesus Christ, God has willed that the Church founded by him be the instrument for the salvation of all humanity (cf. Acts 17:30-31). This truth of faith does not lessen the sincere respect which the Church has for the religions of the world, but at the same time, it rules out, in a radical way, that mentality of indifferentism “characterized by a religious relativism which leads to the belief that ‘one religion is as good as another’”. If it is true that the followers of other religions can receive divine grace, it is also certain that objectively speaking they are in a gravely deficient situation in comparison with those who, in the Church, have the fullness of the means of salvation.  However, “all the children of the Church should nevertheless remember that their exalted condition results, not from their own merits, but from the grace of Christ. If they fail to respond in thought, word, and deed to that grace, not only shall they not be saved, but they shall be more severely judged”. One understands then that, following the Lord’s command (cf. Mt 28:19-20) and as a requirement of her love for all people, the Church “proclaims and is in duty bound to proclaim without fail, Christ who is the way, the truth, and the life (Jn 14:6). In him, in whom God reconciled all things to himself (cf. 2 Cor 5:18-19), men find the fullness of their religious life”.
    Just for kicks let’s stroll down memory lane to John Paul II’s 1998 document Ad tuendam fidem.  I really like these bits:
    Canon 598 – § 1. Those things are to be believed by divine and catholic faith which are contained in the word of God as it has been written or handed down by tradition, that is, in the single deposit of faith entrusted to the Church, and which are at the same time proposed as divinely revealed either by the solemn Magisterium of the Church, or by its ordinary and universal Magisterium, which in fact is manifested by the common adherence of Christ’s faithful under the guidance of the sacred Magisterium. All Christian faithful are therefore bound to avoid any contrary doctrines.

    § 2. Furthermore, each and everything set forth definitively by the Magisterium of the Church regarding teaching on faith and morals must be firmly accepted and held; namely, those things required for the holy keeping and faithful exposition of the deposit of faith; therefore, anyone who rejects propositions which are to be held definitively sets himself against the teaching of the Catholic Church.

    Canon 1436 § 2 of the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, consequently, will receive an appropriate reference to canon 598 § 2, so that it will now read:

    Canon 1436 – § 1. Whoever denies a truth which must be believed with divine and catholic faith, or who calls into doubt, or who totally repudiates the Christian faith, and does not retract after having been legitimately warned, is to be punished as a heretic or an apostate with a major excommunication; a cleric moreover can be punished with other penalties, not excluding deposition.

    § 2. In addition to these cases, whoever obstinately rejects a teaching that the Roman Pontiff or the College of Bishops, exercising the authentic Magisterium, have set forth to be held definitively, or who affirms what they have condemned as erroneous, and does not retract after having been legitimately warned, is to be punished with an appropriate penalty.
    Did you notice that above we read "all Christian faithful" and not "Catholics"?

    I think you should all organize Ad tuendam fidem anniversary parties for tomorrow, 18 May.  Bring a questionable book and… well… have fun.

    • • • • • •
    Powered by: Luke 5:1-11 and WordPress