o{]:¬)

Fr. Z is Moderator of the Catholic Online Forum and the ASK FATHER Question Box. The WDTPRS columns appear weekly in The Wanderer. Fr. Z lives in Rome, though he is often in the USA. He is available for retreats and conferences. E-mail


   Fr. Z on WDTPRS

↑ Grab this Headline Animator


Recent Posts
  • MINI MOVIE REVIEW: Prince Caspain
  • Prayer request - ordination
  • Am I blue? You'd be too ... were you a Passerina cyanea
  • WDTPRS: Trinity Sunday
  • Octave of Pentecost PODCAzTs
  • PODCAzT 60: Pentecost customs; St. Ambrose on the dew of the Holy Spirit
  • Let's get the famous quote right, please?
  • New Sabine guest! Oooo ... look at the colors

  • Recent Comments:

    • porys: + (it means I join to the preyers)
    • elizabeth mckernan: Some of these comments remind me of the old joke:- = Where did you get the idea for your new...
    • Mark M: Gosh; doesn’t sound like the book! Father: if you want the definitive Chronicles of Narnia, then watch...
    • GOR: Great pictures Father! Yes, the Cowbirds are unfazed by any other visitors and if you get a few of them at once,...
    • boredoftheworld: Classically, I can handle my kids watching pg-13 violence, but not pg-13 sex; you liberals will have...

  • Visit the new WDTPRS Store!
    Buy WDTPRS stuff!

    Click below and vote !My site was nominated for Best Religion Blog!


    Calendar


    The Pilgrimage

    Subscribe to ...
    The Wanderer

    Subscribe to ... The Catholic Herald - UK






    This blog is hosted by

    Joyent


    Thanks for the support!


























    WINNER of...

    The 2007 Weblog Awards

















    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Add to Google Reader or Homepage

    Add to My AOL

    Subscribe in Bloglines

    Powered by FeedBurner

    28 April 2007

    The 2nd miracle of St. Gianna Beretta Molla

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 9:04 pm

    In 2005 I wrote a piece in the Catholic Online Forum on the 2nd miracle through the intercession of new St. Gianna Molla.  I reproduce it here, somewhat edited, on her feast day.  The account of this miracle gave me shivers.  I had to share it.

    Sat Mar 05, 2005 4:47 am    Post subject: IN DEPTH: 2nd miracle through St. Gianna Beretta Molla   

    Since I have just recently finished over 100 hours of training at the Congregation for Causes of Saints concerning the history, theology and juridial dimensions of causes of beatification and canonization (investigatiing the life, heroic virtues, martyrdom, reputation of holiness, reputation of martydom, miracles, etc.), I figured I should put some of that training to use and occasionally produce some of it here with some comments that might be of use to others. After all, what training I get isn’t just for me: it has to be for the whole Church or it is worth only the cost of the printing and parchment.

    We had the chance to learn from and question the officials of the Congregation, the experts who collaborate with it, and the physicians and historicals who are experts consultants. We had lectures from the Prefect, Secretary and Under-Secretary, the Promotor of the Faith (so-called "Devil’s Advocate" is a mis-nomer, really) and the Relator General. We had tours of the archives and attended the proceedings of the opening of a cause in the Roman phase. Abundant materials were provided and we were, naturally, allowed then to be thoroughly tested on them.

    Going into the course I was not sure what to expect, but I brought a certain measure of sceptism about some things I had heard (mostly due to faulty and insufficient information, I see now). I heard stories of lives and of miracles which left me nearly with my jaw on the table as I listened and saw the documentation.

    This was a privilege which for the rest of my priesthood will affect how I can help other people understand things about the life of grace in a way I could not before.

    Ad ramos...

    Concerning the second of the two miracles worked by God through St. Gianna:


    In mid November 1999 a Brasilian woman named Elisabete Comparini Arcolino discovered she was pregnant for the fourth time. An echogram on 30 Nov. showed that the developing child was within a small sac only .8 cm in length and 2.3 cm in diameter. The doctor said that it was doubtful that with such a beginning for the gestation that child would come to term. On 9 December a echo showed the embryo a 1.0 cm in length but also a huge increase in coagulation of blood (blood loss), measuring 5.2×3.5 cm. On 19 Dec they found the beating heart of the child, but also a deterioration of the placenta in the lower region of the uterus. A pessimistic prognosis was given. The doctor following the case, Dr. Nadia Bicego Vieitez de Almeida, who had handled Elisabete’s previous pregnancies, said that with the great loss of blood Elisebete would probably spontaneously abort or they would have to do the procedure sooner or later.

    Contrary to expectations, the child’s heart kept beating and the pregnancy continued.

    On 11 February 2000 Elisabete realized there was a serious problem and went to the hospital. The echo showed that the gestational sack’s membrane had broken at 16 weeks of gestation and, while the fetus was alive, there was now a total absence of amniotic fluid. The radiologist testified that there was no amniotic liquid to protect the child from exposure to the outside world and from the external pressure of the uterus itself. This meant that both the child and mother were in serious danger of infection, etc. Dr. Bicego recommended termination of the pregnancy. Elisabete was put on a regime of super hydration, 4 l. of phleboclysis (intravenous injection of an isotonic solution of dextrose or other substances) per day. On 15 Feb a new echo showed that there was no significant increase in the volume of amniotic fluid and the volume was insufficient to bring the pregnancy to term.

    At this point, 15 Feb, the prognosis for the child was precisely zero. Two studies, one in Sao Paolo and one in San Francisco had looked at viability of pregnancies with a ruptured membrane at between 22-26 weeks, many more weeks after the case of Elisabete and her child. In the studies in every case examined every fetus was spontaneously aborted within 60 days of the rupture. In virtually all cases, a fetus of 16 weeks would abort with a few days.

    Dr. Bicega and other doctors told Elisabete that they had to do an abortion to save her life, and gave her some time to make the decision. But Elisabete, as she testified, knew in her heart that she could not do that and that she must try to bring the child to term. When the doctor came for the decision, Elisabete’s husband Carlos Cesar requested that a priest come. He called the parish priest of San Sebastiano, Fr. Ovidio José Alves di Andrade. Dr. Bicega said she would return again in 15 minutes with the documents for their signature approving the abortion.

    Present at the time Dr. Bicega came was a friend of Elisabete, named Isabel, who heard the exchange about the abortion. Isabel went to the hospital chapel to pray to Mary to help bring some clarity to the situation. There Isabel spent some time in prayer. When she was finshed and got up to leave, she saw pass by the door the diocesan Bishop Diogenes Silva Matthes who had come to the hospital to visit another person. Bp. Silva had been celebrant of the wedding of Elisabete and Carlos Cesar at San Sebastiano where they worked as catechists. Isabel told the bishop what was going on and he went to Elisabete’s room and there learned the whole story. The bishop said, “Betinha, we will pray and God will help us” and he asked Dr. Bicega to wait a while longer. Then the bishop left.

    Shortly after the bishop left Fr. Ovidio arrived. He began to give Elisabete the sacrament of anointing. At that point the bishop returned. He had brought with him a biography of Bl. Gianna Beretta Molla. He said to Elisabete: “Do what Blessed Gianna did, and, if necessary, give your life for the child. I was praying at home and I said to the Blessed in prayer, ‘Now has arrived the opportunity for you to be canonized. Intercede before the Lord for the grace of a miracle and save the life of this little child.”

    Elisabete had known about Bl. Gianna and how she died and how the first miracle for her cause was for a woman who had terrible complications from a caesarian section. After knowing about Bl. Gianna, Elisabete herself, in her third pregnancy and after two previous caesarian sections, had decided to give birth normally despite the problems that entailed. At that time the same Bishop Silva had given her a holy card of Bl. Gianna. Elisabete was terribly afraid but she asked Bl. Gianna for help and gave birth to a child weighing over 5kg.

    Therefore, this time, reinforced by past experience and the help of Bl. Gianna and the same bishop, Elisabete told Dr. Bicega she would try to carry the child to term, so long at the child’s heart continued to beat. Various doctors at the hospital expressed their opinion that this was madness. However, Dr. Bicega later testified about that time: “But I, I don’t know if it was by intuition, through my own lack of courage, or if I was drawn by Elisabete’s faith which seemed to have no limit, decided to wait and see what happened.” Elisabete would later testify that for her: “Jesus’ greatest miracle was to change the doctor’s heart. She had been unmovable in her determination to perform abortions, but one day she said to me, ‘Your faith had made me think a great deal. Even I have faith now and so let’s wait for the death of the fetus”.

    Elisabete left the hospital and went to the home of Carlos Cesar’s aunt, Janete Arcolino, who was a nurse. Dr. Bicego lent them the sonar machine so that they could monitor the heart beat of the child and told them to check her temperature and blood pressure every six hours. They continued the super hydration treatments and eventually began a cortisone treatment to prevent problems with the child’s lungs.

    In the meantime, Fr. Ovidio testified later, the whole community was continuing to invoke Bl. Gianna, continuously asking for a miracle. The parish had been very pro-life and every month there was special blessing for women who were with child. Also involved in the prayers to Bl. Gianna was a community of Carmelite sisters who in turn had communicated the request to other convents in Brasil. For her part, Elisabete had a very hard time of things. Despite her faith in God and her past experience, there were times when she was terribly afraid she was going to die with her child. She felt herself sometimes quite abandoned by God and alone. She was worried about what would happen with her other three children if she died.

    Dr. Bicega followed the pregnancy closely and noted that during the whole time there was no accumulation of amniotic fluid. If Elisabete gained any, as soon as she would move to get up to go to the bathroom, she would again lose it all.

    When they had reached the 32nd week and when the baby weighed 1.80k, they decided for a caesarian section delivery, effected on 31 May 2000. The newborn daughter, Gianna, was in good shape with the exception of the left foot which was twisted, probably because of compression with the uterus.

    The problems did not cease there. They found that Elisabete had a wound within a uterine muscle to which the placenta had adhered, thus remaining in place. She had a serious hemorrhage and her lungs collapsed and wound up in intensive care for three days. As part of her treatment Dr. Bicega wanted to interdict her cycle with a kind of false menopause, which would result also in Elisabete not being able to lactate, but Elisabete said she did want to do that.

    The newborn was sent home on 17 June weighing 1.960kg. Later a surgical operation and therapy corrected the twisted foot. In July 2001 a pediatrician Dr. Maria Engracia Ribeiro examined the child completely and found her to be perfectly normal and healthy, intelligent and lively, with the strong personality. Another check on 17 January 2002 found no problems in any of the child’s development, with no immune or respiratory problems and was, for her age, in perfect health.

    The case of the asserted miracle was studied by the “Consulta Medica” of the Congregation for Causes of Saints on 10 April 2003 who determined that despite the severe prognosis for the fetus and the mother as the result of the total loss of amniotic fluid at the 16th week, and despite medical treatment inadequate for such a grave situation, the positive outcome of the pregnancy and health of mother and child were unexplainable in medical terms. The decree super miraculo was promulgated by the Congregation in the presence of Pope John Paul II on 20 December 2003. Since Gianna Beretta Molla had been beatified on 24 April 1994, her canonization was celebrated on 16 May 2004.

    I would put to you several points to consider. Any of which might serve as a starting point for comments.

      1) Saints are presented to us by Holy Mother Church for “the two I’s”: imitation and intercession.

      2) As all Christians are called to imitate Christ, we also must experience self-emptying and the Cross, abandonment to providence and self-donation. We must be willing to lose everything.

      3) We are not alone: the Church Militant and the Church Triumphant are closely knit, interwoven in charity. We on earth must intercede for each other and believe and ask for the intercession of the saints.

      4) God makes use of the weak to demonstrate His might and love.

      5) If we do not believe in miracles, we do not ask for them. If we do not ask for them, they will not be granted.

      6)Our life of faith is noticed by non-believers and they are not unaffected.

      7)What a difference a bishop can make.

      8)How often do you invoke the help of the saints and holy angels?

      9)God ways are not our ways.

      10)No one is too small to not be an occasion of grace for others.

    • • • • • •

    Sales of the Pope’s book very strong

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 1:50 pm

    Reports are coming in about the sales of Pope Benedict’s new book, Jesus of Nazareth.  In some 10 days after its release, 510 thousand copies have been sold in Italy, 480 thousand in Germany and in Poland 100 thousand.

    The Greek edition comes with a letter by the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I, who expresses "great and burning interest" for the work.  He sees it as being a help to ecumenical dialogue.

    Since I returned to the USA for the funeral of Msgr. Richard Schuler, I brought back an extra copy in German as a gift to a priest friend, Fr. George Welzbacher.  In addition to being one of the smartest people I know, his German is very strong.  He told me that Pope Benedict’s style is clear and elegant, easy to follow.  This does not surprise me in the least.  I haven’t started into the German edition, but I am well along in the Italian. 

    You will want this book.  Click here to pre-order it at a discount.  It should be released in mid May.

     

    • • • • • •

    The BBC twists the Tridentine issue

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 1:38 pm

    In an entry yesterday I opined that as the date for the Motu Proprio becomes more concrete (or at least seems to become concrete) some journalists would go start freaking out. 

    Here is a piece from that bastion of conservative thought, the BBC.  Notice that they play the anti-Jewish card, so commonly used against the Church.  They play on fear rather than deal with the issues substantively.  At the end a tiny hand full of dirt is thrown in the direction of those who want the older form of Mass.  Emphases and comments are mine.

    Concerns over Pope’s Latin Mass move
    By Kathryn Westcott
    BBC News

    Pope Benedict’s plans to revive the Latin Mass, which includes prayers for the conversion of Jews, is causing concern among Catholic and Jewish groups about relations between their faiths.  [Look at the card she leads with.]

    ...

    The old wording [of the Tridentine Mass] has none of the Vatican Council thinking that reversed long-standing anti-Jewish views in the Church.   [This is completely rubbish, of course.] Vatican II brought about a revolution in Catholic thinking, highlighting the ancient Jewish roots of Christianity and affirming God’s love for the Jews. 

    Concern is now focused on traditional mass’s Good Friday liturgy which contains a prayer "For the conversion of the Jews". The prayer reads:

    "Let us pray also for the Jews, that the Lord our God may take the veil from their hearts and that they also may acknowledge our Lord Jesus Christ."

    It refers to their "blindness" and prays for them to be "delivered from their darkness."  [Something which could be said about any of us, I’m afraid.]

    John L Allen, a commentator for the influential US-based weekly magazine The National Catholic Reporter says this is the Pope’s "personal call". He has promised to reach out to Christians separated from Rome.

    "His basic motive is pastoral. He is a classic doctrinal conservative and he feels there are people out there who are attached to this mass and there is nothing wrong with it, so why not let them have it."

    The Vatican has said that the Pope wants to heal a rift with ultra-traditionalists who rebelled against Second Vatican Council changes towards an understanding of non-Christian religions. [And that’s bad?  Healing?]

    Their leader, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, now dead, was excommunicated by the late Pope John Paul II and he and his followers broke away from Rome during the 1970s.

    The followers of Archbishop Lefebvre – known as the Society of St Pius X – are said to have been seeking reconciliation with the new pope. The group claims to have roughly one million adherents worldwide.

    ‘Little uptake’

    Many religious experts acknowledge that in real terms, the revival of the Mass may not be widespread. [Others say that it might be, but they don’t get interviewed by the BBC, do they.]

    "We’re more than 40 years away from the Vatican Council and frankly most priests today don’t know how to do it," says Mr Allen. "Of course they can learn but they are stretched and won’t see it as a priority. I don’t really believe there is that much demand for it.

    "Those Catholics who are already interested in the Latin Mass can usually find somewhere where it is celebrated."

    But for some Catholic and Jewish groups this is not the point and they have approached the Vatican about their concerns.  [And now we turn back to a sideshow, no longer interested in the main issue…]

    Rabbi David Rosen president of IJCIC, the International Jewish Committee that represents World Jewry in its relations with other world religions, says: "Any liturgy that presents Jews as being doomed in their faith doesn’t present a very healthy attitude towards Judaism and the Jewish people."  [If the Church believes her claims about who She is, and if the Church accepts the great commission laid upon her by the Lord at His ascension, then the Church ought to be willing to speak clearly about how one is to be saved.  Say you go to a doctor because you know something is seriously wrong, but the doctor refuses either to tell you or present a clear diagnosis of the problem.  Has he done you a service or an injury?]

    "Relations have undergone a profound transformation [since Vatican II]. I don’t think there is any danger of backsliding in terms of the Church indulging in anti-Semitism or anything like that," he told the BBC News website from Jerusalem. [Thus, David Rosen.]

    But he says the move comes within the context of "a certain revival of what might be called conservative theology within the Church.[OOOOooooooo!]

    "Conservative theology itself is not necessarily bad for relations with the Jewish people and even if Catholics believe their path is the absolute truth, that shouldn’t contradict the ability to respect the integrity of others’ identity and choice," he says.  [Right!]

    ‘Disturbing trend’

    Christian groups argue that the issue has become all the more sensitive because the move comes against a backdrop of a perceived drift in Church policy.
       
    "I remember the Latin Mass as a child, and very beautiful it was too – but I hadn’t a clue [about] the importance of what was being said "Teresa Adams BBC News website reader, Kenilworth, UK [That was not the fault of the Church or the Mass.  It might have been the fault of Teresa’s parents or teachers.  It might have been Teresa’s fault if she was a lazy child.  It might be that Teresa wasn’t very bright.  However, the fact that Teresa didn’t get it, doesn’t a) other people didn’t or b) it should be changed.  Do not miss, however, that she said it was "very beautiful".  I guess she understood something all along.]

    "This is only part of what some of us see as a fairly disturbing trend within the Church," Professor John T Pawlikowski, president of the International Council of Christians and Jews told the BBC News Website. "It has been elevated to a higher level than it might otherwise have been."

    He cited recent sermons by the main Vatican preacher, Father Raniero Cantalamessa, which revived old charges about Jewish blame for the death of Christ without provoking a reaction from Benedict or his aides.

    "And, certainly in America, you have certain voices in the Catholic Church, calling for the conversion of Jews on television," said Mr Pawlikowski, professor of Social Ethics at the Catholic Theological Union in Illinois. [Huh?]

    There is also concern that in America bishops are cutting back on personnel who are involved in Catholic and Jewish dialogue. [This is a canard: they are cutting back every department.  They don’t have money like they did in the past.]

    Professor Pawlikowski questions why the Pope needs to issue further authorisation for the Mass, given that there are priests who already have permission to celebrate it.

    ‘God-centred worship’

    "It’s almost like some people in the Vatican want to give it greater validation – almost encourage it," he says.  [Well… dud!]

    Traditionalists not aligned to the Lefebvre movement have welcomed the proposed moves.
       
    "This will give a much-needed emphasis on the sacrificial character of the Mass" – Father Brian Harrison
    "I think it will help to swing the balance in favour a return to more reverent, God-centred, dignified worship," says Father Brian Harrison, associate professor of theology of the Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico. [At the end, a few words from a well-informed person favorable toward the older Mass.  That’s balanced, right?  Diligent?]

    Commentators say the change is unlikely to go far enough to win back the "hardcore" followers of Archbishop Lefebvre.

    But they say the Pope is hoping that if the Church is seen to be meeting the Lefebvreites half way, more and more may choose to return to the Church over time. 

     

     

    • • • • • •

    5 May could be it

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 1:28 am

    In the blog of Damian Thompson on Telegraph.co.uk:

    May 5, the feast day of Pope St Pius V. That is apparently the date Pope Benedict has chosen for his announcement of the lifting of restrictions on the celebration of the beautiful Latin Tridentine Mass, introduced by St Pius in 1570.

    What I find interesting are the various ways some are trying to muddy the waters or delay the release of the Motu Proprio.  

    Watch for some journalists in the next week to start freaking out. 

    • • • • • •
    Powered by: Luke 5:1-11 and WordPress