o{]:¬)

Fr. Z is also Moderator of the Catholic Online Forum and the (now dormant) ASK FATHER Question Box. The WDTPRS columns appear weekly in The Wanderer. Fr. Z is available for retreats and conferences.

* E-MAIL
* TWITTER: @fatherz
LOGIN or REGISTER




VOTE!

My site was nominated for Best Religion Blog!


   Fr. Z on WDTPRS

↑ Grab this Headline Animator


Recent Posts
  • Off to another point on the list
  • Vote on Stupak Amendment
  • Show tonight!
  • Bp. Donald "Ineffable" Trautman's jihad against the new translation [Fr. Z POLL]
  • Seminary TLM training? A shout to seminarians!
  • Congressional Dems paying attention to Catholic Bishops
  • Bp. James D. Conley on Health Care Reform
  • "INEFFABLE" ALERT!

  • Recent Comments:


  • The Z-Cam in the Sabine Chapel is ON AIR!Z-Cam and Radio Sabina: LIVE

    Visit the WDTPRS Stores!
    Buy WDTPRS stuff!

    Calendar

    August 2007
    S M T W T F S
    « Jul   Sep »
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  


    Subscribe to ... The Wanderer

    Subscribe to ... The Catholic Herald - UK





    This blog is hosted by

    Joyent

    Thanks for the support!

    2009 Catholic New Media Awards Winner

    * Best Blog by a Cleric
    * Best Written Blog
    * Most Informative Blog
    * People's Choice Blog
    * Best Podcast by a Cleric
    * Best Podcast by a Man
    * Best Podcast by a Religious
    * Best Produced Podcast
    * Best Video Podcast
    * Funniest Podcast
    * Most Entertaining Podcast
    * Most Informative Podcast
    * Most Spiritual Podcast
    * People's Choice Podcast
    * Best Overall Catholic Website


    2008 Weblog Awards Winner

    2007 Weblog Awards Winner



    * Best Apologetic Blog
    * Best blog by Clergy
    * Best Individual Blog
    * Most Informative Blog
    * Best Insider News Blog
    * Smartest Blog
    * Most Spiritual Blog
    * Best Written Blog




    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Add to Google Reader or Homepage

    Add to My AOL

    Subscribe in Bloglines

    Powered by FeedBurner

    Fr. Z's Facebook page



    TwitterCounter for

    Where Fr. Z will be:
  • Upcoming Events:
  • Events
  • Buy Fr. Z a cup of coffee!





    Your support makes it possible for me to continue with this blog.




    My November goal...

    free counters



    6 August 2007

    A little know Roman fact about the feast of the Transfiguration

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 5:19 pm

    Did you know that today is the titular feast of the Basilica of St. John Lateran, the Cathedral of Rome?

    "But Father! But Father", I can hear you objecting. "Don’t you know that that basilica is called ‘St. John‘? How can the Transfiguration of the Lord be the titular feast?"

    Glad you asked. The real name of the Lateran Basilica is the Archbasilica of the Most Holy Savior, St. John Baptist and St. John the Evangelist at the Lateran. So, for a titular feast you really need a feast of the Lord.

    While today is the main day for the basilica, they do make much over the two saints John as well. I do too. For my "onomastico", as the Italians call it, or "name day" I claim both the Baptist and the evangelist. That way I get two says in the summer (don’t forget the feast of the Beheading of St. John the Baptist) and one in the winter.

    And let us not forget that the Lateran Basilica is a Major Papal (formerly Patriarchal) Basilica. There are lots of minor basilicas in Rome and throughout the world There were five Patriarchal Basilicas in Rome to go with the five ancient patriarchal sees, four major patriarchal basilicas and one minor. How did that happen? The patriarchs always were allocated (symbolically) a basilica in Rome, thus Constantinople, Alexandria, and Antioch, had St. Peter’s in the Vatican, St. Paul’s outside the walls, and St. Mary Major. When Jerusalem was added as a patriarchate it was assigned St. Lawrence outside the walls, though it remained a minor basilica.

    The Bishop of Rome as Patriarch of the West had the Lateran Basilica obviously. And he still does, even though the Pope seems to have dropped the title of Patriarch of the West (remember that?). Interesting move that. And now some of the Orthodox are irritated that the Pope dropped the title.

    I opined a long time ago that by dropping the title the Pope might be signaling that he is not patriarch of the West ONLY, but patriarch of pretty much everywhere (except for outer space, which I think belongs to someone else whom I shall not name).

    Anyway, this is the titular feast of the Lateran Basilica.

    • • • • • •

    Article on older form of Mass in Memphis, TN

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 5:08 pm

    I got this from a reader in Memphis.  I thought you might be interested.

     

    I saw that you wrote last week about Bishop Steib’s (Memphis, TN) statement on the Motu Proprio.  You may be interested in a very positive story that was in today’s issue of the Memphis Commercial Appeal about the 2 parishes in the diocese that celebrate the 1962 Mass.  This was on the first page of the second section, and was accompanied by a 6"x8" color picture of the priest with 2 servers (third pic down on the webpage).
     
    By chance, my wife & I decided to go to this parish for the Latin Mass yesterday – the first time either of us had been to a Latin Mass.  The reporter mentions that "at least 10% of the women wore head coverings" – That’s a VERY low estimate – I’d say it was easily 70%
     
    My emphases and comments.
     
    With priests freer to celebrate in Latin, more Masses may follow older tradition
    By James Dowd
    Contact
    August 6, 2007
     
    The recent decision by Pope Benedict XVI to relax restrictions surrounding the Latin Mass is a welcome return to tradition, some local Catholics say.

    And while the Latin or Tridentine Mass is celebrated in only two parishes in the Catholic Diocese of Memphis, if enough Catholics express interest, other congregations may soon follow suit.

    At Bartlett’s Church of the Nativity, the Latin Mass is celebrated every Sunday, except for the third one in the month. On that day many parishioners travel to Blessed Sacrament Catholic Church in Midtown for the Latin Mass that’s celebrated there.

    "There’s a group of us that goes to Latin Mass wherever it’s celebrated. It’s the way we worship," said Joseph Lenzi, 94, after Sunday’s morning service at Church of the Nativity. "There’s a reverence to it and a mystery. It just seems to bring the holiness of our faith alive."

    On July 7, the pope issued a directive freeing priests to celebrate the ancient Mass without first having to obtain a bishop’s permission. That requirement had been in place since the Second Vatican Council in the early 1960s, when the Mass was modernized to be celebrated in local languages. [Grrrr…. same ol’ same ol’...]

    Bishop J. Terry Steib will discuss the pope’s directive at a quarterly series of meetings with all priests in the diocese this autumn.

    "So far I haven’t been approached by any parishioners wanting it," said Father John Geaney, diocesan spokesman and priest at St. Augustine Catholic Church in South Memphis. "But it’ll be easier to add a Latin Mass now if people do want it."

    The Latin Mass differs from the modern version in ways other than language. The priest faces away from the congregation for much of the time and during Holy Communion the consecrated Host is placed in a communicant’s mouth, not on the palm. [Grrrr….]

    "The Latin Mass is so pure, it’s so reverent, I just feel more spiritual when I worship this way," said Drew Sill, 30. "And I like the fact that the Latin Mass is the same in every culture in the world. It brings us all together in community."

    On Sunday at Church of the Nativity, more than 75 showed up for the Latin Mass, which sometimes attracts more than 100. The crowd included a large number of young families and children and at least 10 percent of the women wore head coverings during the service.

    One of them, Delores Ryan, 71, believes the traditional ways are best. And she said folks who don’t understand Latin aren’t at a loss—a printed translation of the service makes it easy to follow.

    "The Bible speaks of women covering their heads and our way of worship was the same for hundreds of years until it was changed after Vatican II," said Ryan. "I want to continue those practices. It’s more meaningful to me this way."

    Father Michael Morgera, who’s served at Church of the Nativity for three years, said response has been growing. He’s considering offering a morning Latin Mass during the week.

    "Latin has been the universal language of the church and it’s the same, whether in Bartlett or in Hong Kong," said Morgera, 56. "In the Latin Mass there’s very much a sense of the awe of God and how we stand before Him and need His mercy and care. The prayers are profound."

    —James Dowd: 901-529-2737

    More info:

    Latin Mass

    The Latin or Tridentine Mass is celebrated at two parishes in the Catholic Diocese of Memphis at various times:

    Church of the Nativity

    5955 St. Elmo 382-2504

    Blessed Sacrament Catholic Church

    2564 Hale 452-1543

    All in all, that is pretty positive!
     

    • • • • • •

    Where you at?

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 4:53 pm

    It’s time for another "Where you are" entry.  Here is s snapshot of users of this blog.  Remember, the stats I get don’t always show accurate locations, or every possible user.  This is just a glimpse to let you know you are not alone, dear readers.

    Winnipeg, Manitoba
    Reston, Virginia
    Milton Keynes
    Via Del Mar, Valparaiso
    Pensacola, Florida
    Seattle, Washington
    Steventon, Wiltshire
    Northbrook, Illinois
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin
    Metairie, Louisiana
    Washington, District of…
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
    Winston Salem, North Ca…
    North Babylon, New York
    Collinston, Louisiana
    Bonnie, Illinois
    Lynn, Massachusetts
    Stuttgart, Baden-Wurtte…
    New York
    Westland, Michigan
    Balham, Bromley
    Haulingort, Nordrhein-W…
    Helsinki, Southern Finl…
    Bridgeville, Pennsylvania
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Winnipeg, Manitoba
    Irving, Texas
    Naperville, Illinois
    Fort Monroe, Virginia
    Calgary, Alberta
    Los Angeles, California
    Mountain View, California
    Sumter, South Carolina
    Korea, Republic of
    New Haven, Connecticut
    Berlin
    Bratislava
    Hever, Bromley
    Medway, Massachusetts
    Portland, Maine
    Richmond, Virginia
    Weehawken, New Jersey
    Middlebury, Vermont
    Jakarta, Jawa Barat
    London, Lambeth
    Long Beach, California
    Dubai, Dubayy
    Liverpool, New York
    Brooklyn, New York
    Fond Du Lac, Wisconsin
    San Diego, California
    Cambridge, Cambridgeshire
    Madison, Wisconsin
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Paragould, Arkansas
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    West Roxbury, Massachus…
    Columbus, Ohio
    Osasco, Sao Paulo
    Spring Hill, Florida
    Plano, Texas
    Unknown
    Portland, Maine
    Saint Paul, Minnesota
    Clearwater, Florida
    Hilliard, Ohio
    Portland, Maine
    Hillside, New Jersey
    Trenton, New Jersey
    Overland Park, Kansas
    Mississippi State, Miss…
    London, Lambeth
    Jakarta, Jawa Barat    
    Lansing, Michigan
    Geneva, Geneve
    New York
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
    San Pablo, California
    Ballston Spa, New York
    Vancouver, British Colu…
    Fremont, California
    Minneapolis, Minnesota
    Belfast
    Auburn, Alabama
    Fairmont, West Virginia
    Parainen, Western Finland
    Grnwald, Bayern
    Pensacola, Florida
    Gurnee, Illinois
    Middlebury, Vermont
    Philadelphia, Pennsylva…
    Odessa, Florida
    Marina Del Rey, Califor…
    Paris, Ile-de-France
    Tucson, Arizona
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    Toronto, Ontario
    Washington, District of…
    Clearwater, Florida
    North Kingstown, Rhode …
    Akron, Ohio
    Sackville, New Brunswick
    San Diego, California
    Svedmyra, Stockholms Lan
    Vienna, Virginia
    Fairfield, Connecticut
    Chicago, Illinois
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Johnstown, Pennsylvania
    Steubenville, Ohio
    Bondville, Illinois
    Mattawan, Michigan
    Arlington, Virginia
    Palmerton, Pennsylvania
    Brno, Jihomoravsky Kraj
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Los Angeles, California
    Waverley, Massachusetts
    Willingboro, New Jersey
    Puebla De Zaragoza, Pue…
    Dearborn Heights, Michi…
    Wallingford, Connecticut
    Liverpool, New York
    Verona, Wisconsin
    Dubai, Dubayy
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Manassas, Virginia
    Barry, Vale of Glamorga…
    Houston, Texas
    Dortmund, Nordrhein-Wes…
    Mount Vernon, Virginia
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Rathcoole, Dublin
    East Wenatchee, Washing…
           


    • • • • • •

    Commonweal

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 12:50 pm

    If there is a Commonweal subscriber out there, could you get in touch?

    • • • • • •

    Patristic Rosary Project: 4th Luminous Mystery - Transfiguration

    CATEGORY: NAPLAM, SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 12:43 pm

    Some of you newcomers to WDTPRS might not know that I built up something called the Patristic Rosary Project.  When I looked at the Transfiguration, 4th of the Luminous Mysteries, here is what I provided:

    ____________

    We continue our Patristic Rosary Project today with the:

    4th Luminous Mystery: The Transfiguration

    The Mystery of the Transfiguration was a matter of intense reflection on the part of the Fathers.

    Remember that this takes place some eight days after the Lord confers the keys on Peter by the Jordan at Caesarea Philippi.  The Fathers thought everything in Scripture was significant and they attached great meaning to numbers.  Let us see what the mighty Ambrose of Milan (+397) has to say about the timing of the Transfiguration in relation to the events at Caesarea Philippi:

    You may know that Peter, James and John did not taste death and were worthy to see the glory of the resurrection.  It says, "about eight days after these words, He took those three alone and led them onto the mountain." Why is it that he says, "eight days after these words"?  He that hears the words of Christ and believes will see the glory of Christ at the time of the resurrection.  The resurrection happened on the eight day, and most of the psalms were written "For the eighth".  (cf. e.g., Ps 6:1; 12:1 LXX and Vulgate)  It shows us that He said that he who because of the Word of God shall lose his own soul will save it, (Luke 9:24) since he renews his promises at the resurrection.  (Matthew 16:25-27)  But Matthew and Mark say that they were taken after six days.  (Cf. Matthew 17:1; Mark 9:2)  We may say that they were taken after six thousand years, because a thousand years in God’s sight are as one day.  (Ps 89:4 LXX)  We counted more than six thousand years.  We prefer to understand six days as a symbol, because God created the works of the world in six days (Gen 2:1), so that we understand works through the time and the world through the works.  [Exposition of the Gospel of Luke 7.6-7]
    St. Augustine (+430) also gets into this issue of six days, as recounted in Matthew and Mark, and eight days (as in Luke) in a discussion of the resurrection three days after the Passion and death of the Lord.  He is trying to make sense of the numbers.  In other places I have explained how the ancients numbered their periods of days, that is, inclusively.

    St. Cyril of Alexandria (+444) wrote of the Transfiguration in terms of the connection between suffering and glory, between the Law and the Prophets, between the foreshadowings of the past and their fulfillment.
    "I say to you, there are some of those standing here who shall not taste of death until they have seen the kingdom of God." ... By the "kingdom of God" He means the sight of the glory in which He will appear at His revelation to the inhabitants of earth.  He will come in the glory of God the Father and not in a humble condition like ours.  How did He make those who received the promise spectators of a thing so wonderful?  He goes up into the mountain taking three chosen disciples with Him.  He is transformed to such a surpassing and godlike brightness that His garments even glittered with rays of fire and seemed to flash like lightning.  Besides, Moses and Elijah stood at Jesus’ side and spoke with one another about His departure that He was about, it says, to accomplish at Jerusalem.  This meant the mystery of the dispensation in the flesh and of His precious suffering upon the Cross.  It is also true that the law of Moses and the word of the holy prophets foreshadowed the mystery of Christ.  the law of Moses foreshadowed it by types and shadows, painting it as in a picture.  The holy prophets in different ways declared before hand that in due time He would appear in our likeness and for the salvation and life of us all, agree to suffer death on the tree.  Moses and Elijah standing before Him and talking with one another was a sort of representation.  It excellently displayed our Lord Jesus Christ as having the law and the prophets for His bodyguard.  It displayed Christ as being the Lord of the Law and the Prophets, as foretold in them by those things that they proclaimed in mutual agreement beforehand.  The words of the prophets are not different from the teachings of the law.  I imagine this was what the most priestly Moses and the most distinguished of the prophets Elijah were talking about with one another.  [Commentary on Luke, Homily 51]
    The last line here is interesting.  It makes me call to mind what one finds in studying ancient historiography, such as Herodotus and Thucydides.  When reporting the speeches great figures made, about which they might at the very best have some distant report from someone who heard about the content of the speech, such as Pericles’s great oration, from a generation or more removed, Thucydides would record what the great man ought to have said in that momentous occasion.  This sounds much like what Cyril is doing.

    Have you ever wondered why some get some graces and others do not?  St. Maximus Confessor (+682) gives an interesting insight while he comments on the Transfiguration:
    The Lord does not always appear in glory to all who stand before Him. To beginners He appears in the form of a servant (Phil 2:7); to those able to follow Him as He climbs the high mountain of His Transfiguration He appears in the form of God, the form in which He existed before the world came to be (John 17:5). It is therefore possible for the same Lord not to appear in the same way to all who stand before Him, but to appear to some in one way and to others in another way, according to the measure of each person’s faith. When the Logos of God becomes manifest and radiant in us, and His face shines like the sun, then His clothes will also look white. That is to say, the words of the Gospel will then be clear and distinct, with nothing concealed. And Moses and Elijah – the more spiritual principles of the Law and the Prophets – will also be present with Him.  
    St. John Chrysostom (+407) takes on this same issue:
    "Now after six days Jesus took Peter, James and John his brother, led them up on a high mountain by themselves;" (Matt. 17:1) ...Note, I pray you, the severe goodness of Matthew, not concealing those who were preferred to himself. Also, John often does this (in his Gospel), recording the peculiar praises of Peter with great sincerity. For the choir of these holy men (disciples) was everywhere pure from envy and vainglory. Having taken, therefore, the leaders, "He was transfigured before them. His face shone like the sun, and His clothes became as white as the light. And behold, Moses and Elijah appeared to them, talking with Him." (Matt. 17:2,3) Why does Jesus take with Him these three only? Because these were superior to the rest. And, Peter indeed showed his superiority by exceedingly loving Him; John; by being exceedingly loved by Him; and James again by his answer which he gave with his brother, saying "We are able (to drink this cup);" (Matt. 20:22) but not by this answer only, but also by his works …For so earnest was he (James), and so grievous to the Jews, that Herod himself supposed that he found favor with the Jews by slaying him (James)."  [St. John Chrysostom, Homily 56]    
    I suppose we ought to be careful what we ask for.  Our earthly fate notwithstanding, we are always able to have a moment of Transfiguration in the proper reception of Holy Communion, which is far more than a mere vision of something of Christ’s divine shining through our humanity.  The Eucharist is not only the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Christ, it is for us a "pledge of future glory, containing in Itself all delight", as St. Thomas Aquinas (+1274) wrote for the feast of Corpus Christi, and which we all sing whenever there is Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament.  A good reception of Communion is an even greater encounter with the Lord, than a Transfiguration.  It opens up the way to a bright future for us.  On that note, Gregory of Nazianzus (+389) ties us all into the mystery of the Transfiguration, saying:
    He was bright as the lightning on the mountain and became more luminous than the sun, initiating us into the mystery of the future.  [Oration 3.19, On the Son]


    • • • • • •

    Too many people for Pope’s Angelus so he goes to them

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 12:22 pm

    Yesterday for the Holy Father’s noontime Angelus at Castelgandolfo, there were so many people present that they couldn’t all be in the courtyard of the papal villa. 

    So, despite clearly having a bad head cold, after finishing the Angleus the Holy Father kindly made his way around through the palazzo to the external balcony on the facade facing the town square so that people could see him.


    • • • • • •

    Chabanel Responsorial Psalm Project

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 12:15 pm

    You might take a look at the Chabanel Responsorial Psalm Project.

    • • • • • •

    New Orleans: Pontifical High Mass - 1 November

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 12:13 pm

    I got this from a kind reader:

    Father, I have been informed that Archbishop Alfred Hughes of New Orleans will celebrate a pontifical High Mass according to the 1962 missal on the feast of All Saints, at St. Patrick’s (the only indult parish in the archdiocese).  Archbishop Hughes is due to submit his resignation for reasons on age this December.  I doubt it’s the swan song he’s envisioned for himself, but we’ll give him, his chancery entourage, and the clergy of New Orleans something to remember.
     
    We are particularly attentive to liturgy at St. Patrick’s, and rather extensive preparations are under way to bring it all off "after the high Roman fashion".  I’m hunting up someone to photograph and perhaps make a video of the occasion.
    This sort of news like balm for the soul.

    I sincerely beleive that if bishops really wanted to control the use of the older form of Mass, they would institute it themselves at their cathedral, with all the resources of the diocese used to make it the showcase of the region, and be the celebrant at least once a month.   He would make sure a few places had it and did it well.  People would flock to the cathedral and those places rather than try to get it going in their parishes.

     

    I applaud Archbp. Hughes for this decision. 

    • • • • • •

    Bishop of Augsburg on the Motu Proprio

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 12:09 pm

    A kind reader in Germany sent the following about the reception of the Motu Proprio by the Bishop of Augsburg, His Excellency Most Reverend Walter Mixa.  My correspondent includes a helpful summary.

    Dear Fr. Z,

    the Bishop of Augsburg, H.E. Msgr. Walthr Mixa, has issued official regulations for the implemantation of SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM. I don’t like "labeling" bishops, but to give you some background, he is a very orthodox bishop, who’s also very outspoken and appears on national television in defence of Catholic doctrine. He is, however, as far as I can see, not a great friend of the usus antiquior, and is called by some a "Neocon". Certainly, these guidelines seem rather restrictive, and one does wonder if the establishment of a minimum number of 25 faithful resident in the respective parish to ask for the usus extraordinarius (No. 4) is really backed by Summ. Pont., which seems to deliberately not establish such a number. Also remarkable: a religious practice limited to the usus extraordinarius is not to be allowed for the faithful (No 6). The use of the novus ordo lectionary in the forma extraordinaria is "urgently recommended" (No. 7). There is to be a special qualification programme before celebrating the forma extraordinaria publicly, which is I think positive, if not effectively used as a barrier (No. 9). And: the parish priest has to report the public celebration of the forma extraordinaria to the vicarius generalis, including number of people requesting, people attending and name of celebrant.

    Here is the text in German (with my emphases) from www.kath.net:

    Der Bischof von Augsburg erlässt Ausführungsbestimmungen zum Apostolischen Schreiben Motu Proprio SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM - Das Schreiben im Wortlaut

    Augsburg (www.kath.net)
    Der Bischof von Augsburg hat vor wenigen Tagen Ausführungsbestimmungen zum Apostolischen Schreiben „Motu Proprio SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM erlassen. KATH.NET dokumentiert die Ausführungen im Wortlaut:

    Gemäß dem Motu Proprio Papst Benedikt XVI. SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM ist es ab 14.09.2007 erlaubt, dass Messopfer nach dem vom sel. Papst Johannes XXIII. promulgierten Editio typica des Römischen Messbuchs als außerordentliche Form der Liturgie der Kirche unter den dort aufgeführten Bedingungen zu feiern. Eingedenk der Mahnung des Heiligen Vaters, dass es Aufgabe des Bischofs bleibt, darüber zu wachen, dass alles friedlich und sachlich geschieht, erlasse ich hiermit folgende Ausführungsbestimmungen nach c. 31 CIC:

    1. Die im oben genannten Motu Proprio enthaltenen Bestimmungen treten für die Diözese Augsburg zum 14.09. 2007 in Kraft und sind strikt einzuhalten.

    2. Die forma ordinaria der Feier der Eucharistie ist und bleibt das von Papst Paul VI. veröffentlichte und dann in zwei weiteren Auflagen von Johannes Paul II. neu herausgegebene Missale. Die Feier nach der Fassung des Missale Romanum, die unter der Autorität von Papst Johannes XXIII. 1962 veröffentlicht wurde, ist dagegen eine forma extraordinaria (MP Art.1). Jede eigenmächtige Veränderung der dort vorgegebenen Texte und Riten oder deren Vermischung ist zu unterlassen.

    3. Da alle Gläubigen gemäß c. 214 CIC das Recht haben, den Gottesdienst gemäß den Vorschriften des eigenen, von den zuständigen Hirten der Kirche genehmigten Ritus zu feiern und der eigenen Form des geistlichen Lebens zu folgen, kann weder ein Priester dazu gezwungen werden, die Messe in der forma extraordinaria zu feiern, noch darf den Gläubigen, die dies wünschen, die Messe in dieser Form vorenthalten werden. Daher ist in jeder Pfarrei zumindest der Pfarrgottesdienst für alle Gläubigen an Sonn- und Feiertagen in der forma ordinaria zu halten, wenn dort eine Eucharistiefeier stattfindet (vgl. c. 528 § 2. i.V. m. c. 530, 7° CIC). Auch an Werktagen ist dafür zu sorgen, dass die Gläubigen ausreichend die Möglichkeit erhalten, die Messe in der ordentlichen Form mitzufeiern.

    4. Die gemäß Art. 5 § 1 des Motu Proprio bezeichnete, in einer Pfarrei dauerhaft existierende Gruppe, die den zuständigen Pfarrer bitten kann, dass für sie die heilige Messe nach dem im Jahr 1962 herausgegebenen römischen Messbuch gefeiert wird, muss zumindest fünfundzwanzig Personen umfassen und in der betreffenden Pfarrei tatsächlich ihren Wohnsitz oder zumindest dauerhaften Aufenthaltsort haben.

    5. Die Bitte der Gläubigen nach der Feier der Messe in der forma extraordinaria darf der Pfarrer nur entsprechen, wenn gewährleistet ist, dass die Bittenden die Verbindlichkeit des II. Vatikanums und seiner Beschlüsse anerkennen und treu zum Papst und zu den Bischöfen stehen.

    6. Zur vollen Communio gehört, dass die Gläubigen die Feier nach den neuen liturgischen Büchern im Prinzip nicht ausschließen. Es ist daher darauf zu achten, dass Gläubige, die um die Messfeier in forma extraordinaria bitten, auch den Zugang finden zum spirituellen Reichtum und der theologischen Tiefe der Messfeier in forma ordinaria, damit „dass Missale Pauls VI. die Gemeinden eint und von ihnen geliebt wird“ (Brief Benedikt XVI. an die Bischöfe vom 07.07.2007). Eine religiöse Praxis, die sich ausschließlich auf die Messfeier in forma extraordinaria beschränkt, darf es daher nicht geben.

    7. Es wird dringend empfohlen, dass, wie in Motu Proprio Art 6. Angeführt, auch bei der Messfeier in forma extraordinaria die Lesungen in der Volkssprache und nach der neuen Leseordnung vorgetragen werden.

    8. Nach Möglichkeit soll den Gläubigen, die in der eigenen Pfarrei keine entsprechend große Gruppe bilden, vom Bischof eine geeignete Kirche zur Messfeier in forma extraordinaria zur Verfügung gestellt werden. Eine entsprechende Regelung nach regionalen Gesichtspunkten ist in Vorbereitung.

    9. Damit ein Priester die Heilige Messe in der forma extraordinaria feiern darf, bedarf es gemäß Moto Proprio Art. 5 § 4 einer besonderen Eignung, da der Gebrauch des alten Missale ein gewisses Maß an liturgischer Bildung und einen Zugang zur lateinischen Sprache voraussetzt, wie sie heute nicht mehr häufig anzutreffen sind (vgl. Benedikt XVI. an die Bischöfe vom 07.07. 2007). Daher bedürfen Priester, die nicht bereits in dieser Form ausgebildet wurden vor der öffentlichen Zelebration einer speziellen Qualifizierung. Eine entsprechende Fortbildung durch das Institut für Aus- und Fortbildung und Begleitung ist vorgesehen.

    10. Damit der Bischof dem Wunsch des Papstes nach Berichterstattung der Erfahrungen mit der Regelung des Motu Proprio nachkommen kann, hat der Pfarrer dem Generalvikar zu berichten, wenn in einer Pfarrei den Bitten einer Gruppe von Gläubigen um die Messfeier in forma extraordinaria nachgekommen wird. Dabei ist die Anzahl der Beantragenden, die Zahl der Gottesdienstbesucher und der Name des Zelebranten zu nennen.

    Augsburg, 24.07.2007
    Walter Mixa
    Bischof von Augsburg

     

    • • • • • •

    6 August: Transfiguration of the Lord

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 9:19 am

    What Does the Prayer Really Say? Transfiguration & 18th Sunday of Ordinary Time

    ORIGINALLY PRINTED IN The Wanderer in 2006

    ...

    This year our Sunday coincides with the feast of the Transfiguration. Because Ordinary Time is not a “strong “ season like the Lent/Easter cycle or Advent/Christmas, a feast of Our Lord substitutes the Ordinary Sunday. Let’s look at all three of the prayers for the Transfiguration.

    The word transfiguratio is interesting in itself. In classical, post-Augustinian Latin Pliny used this for “a change of shape”. However, that is not what happened with Christ on the mountain, probably Mount Tabor in Galilee not far from Nazareth. What happened?

    If we see Christ’s Baptism at the Jordan as the beginning point of His public life, and the Ascension as the end, then the Transfiguration its zenith. The accounts of the Transfiguration are found in Matthew 17:1-6, Mark 9:1-8, and Luke 9:28-36. Also, 2 Peter 1:16-18 and John 1:14 refer to it. What happened? Scripture tells us that a week or so after Jesus and the disciples were at Caesarea Philippi (where Christ gave Peter the "keys") Jesus took Peter, James and John to a high mountain. They were surrounded by a bright cloud, like that in which God spoke to Moses. Christ shone with light so dazzling it was hard to see. On either side of Him were Moses the Lawgiver and Elijah the Prophet. A voice was heard, as at the time of Jesus’ Baptism: "This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased; listen to him". The Gospels of Matthew and Mark use the Greek word metemorphothe for what happened. St. Jerome in his Vulgate chose transfiguratus est. The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) expand the event saying "his face did shine as the sun: and his garments became white as snow," or "as light," according to the Greek text. This brightness has been taken to be a glimpse of Christ’s divinity shining through His flesh. Christ allowed the three key Apostles to see this so as to strengthen them before His Passion soon to follow.

    Getting back to the word transfiguratio, it clearly points to a dramatic change, though in Christ’s case not one of form or shape. The word is from the preposition trans with figura. A figura is “a form, shape” but also in philosophical language a “quality, kind, nature, manner”. Most interesting to me is the mean of figura as a “form of a word” or “a figure of speech”. Think of the Prologue of the Gospel of John 1:14, recited by priests for centuries at the end of Holy Mass: “we have beheld his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father”. In the Prologue of John the Evangelist says that Jesus the Son is the divine logos, the Word: “In the beginning was the Word….” A word is an utterance which projects the concept of the speaker. The Jews has used Hebrew memra, God’s creative or directive word or speech which manifests His power in the mind or in matter, as a substitute for the divine Name of God. Jerome’s choice of a word with the root figura or “figure of speech” is very apt in many ways, and its draws our imaginations into the realm of God’s eternal uttering, His eternal rhetoric.

    COLLECT (Transfiguration):
    Deus, qui fidei sacramenta
    in Unigeniti tui gloriosa Transfiguratione
    patrum testimonio roborasti,
    et adoptionem filiorum perfectam mirabiliter praesignasti,
    concede nobis famulis tuis,
    ut, ipsius dilecti Filii tui vocem audientes,
    eiusdem coheredes effici mereamur.

    LITERAL VERSION:
    O God, who in the glorious Transfiguration
    of your Only-begotten Son
    strengthened the sacrament of faith by the witness of the fathers (Moses and Elijah),
    and in a marvelous way foreshadowed the perfect adoption of children,
    grant to your servants that,
    hearing the voice of Your beloved Son himself,
    we may merit to be made the same Son’s coheirs.

    In the Transfiguration, God reveals more fully the Sonship of Jesus and, thus, reveals in Jesus, our own sonship. When the Father reveals the Son as Son, He is telling us about His own life, how He generates the Son and how the Holy Spirit from all eternity is the love between them. Fortified with this knowledge, we can participate in the life of the Trinity in a fuller way. Because of our unity with Christ in our common human nature, the way to divine sonship is opened up. He is the Father’s Son by nature, but we by grace. God makes us His children through a perfect adoption… adoptio perfecta. From God’s point of view, it is perfect (“brought to completion”) because God puts His seal and mark upon us. From our point of view, it will be perfect only when we see God face to face in heaven.

    Because of this adoption, the adoptio filiorum and adoptio perfecta, an eternal inheritance awaits us. We merit a patrimony. St. Leo the Great (+461) said in a sermon (s. 51): “In this mystery of the Transfiguration, God’s Providence has laid a solid foundation for the hope of the Church, so that the whole body of Christ may know what a transformation will be granted to it, and that the members may be assured that they will be sharers in the glory which shone forth in their Head.”

    We are already sons and daughters by God’s adoption, but that sonship is not yet completed. We lack the final essential component: perseverance in faith and obedience for the whole course of our lives. Even the Apostle Peter, his eyes dazzled by the Lord on Mount Tabor, failed to see what was happening. The great St. Augustine in a sermon on the Transfiguration (s. 78, 6), addresses Peter, and through Peter he really addresses us: “Descend the mount, O Peter. You wanted to rest on the mountain. Come down.” We still have work to do in this life before we can rest. Citing the same passage of Augustine the CCC 556 takes up this same theme:

    Peter did not yet understand this when he wanted to remain with Christ on the mountain. It has been reserved for you, Peter, but for after death. For now, Jesus says: “Go down to toil on earth, to serve on earth, to be scorned and crucified on earth. Life goes down to be killed; Bread goes down to suffer hunger; the Way goes down to be exhausted on his journey; the Spring goes down to suffer thirst; and you refuse to suffer?”

     

    SUPER OBLATA:
    Oblata munera, quaesumus, Domine,
    gloriosa Unigeniti tui Transfiguratione sanctifica,
    nosque a peccatorum maculis,
    splendoribus ipsius illustrationis, emunda.

    Two words catch our attention here. First, splendor, found in our favored L&S but not in dictionaries of later Latin such as Souter or Blaise/Chirat. Splendor means “sheen, brightness, brilliance, luster, splendor”. Logically, it also refers to “excellence”. We should tie splendor to gloria, that divine characteristic. Splendor is probably here because gloriosa was used earlier. Words like gloria, splendor and claritas (in the next prayer) are nearly interchangeable. Using a variety of different words is a sine qua non for a good orator. An illustratio is a technical term from rhetoric, a “vivid representation” intended to complete a concept in the mind of the listener. The word transfiguratio itself may have an overlay of meaning from rhetoric.

    LITERAL VERSION:
    Sanctify, O Lord, we beseech You,
    the offered gifts by the glorious Transfiguration of your Only-Begotten,
    and cleanse us from the stains of sins by the splendors of His dazzling example.

    In this context think of illustratio as a momentary flash of who Christ really is, both man and God. A word which is uttered projects a meaning to another. Here, a dazzling vision “utters” another explanation of God’s will even as the divine voice was heard by the three Apostles. But such a vivid “example” must alter us who perceive it.

    POST COMMUNION:
    Caelestia, quaesumus, Domine, alimenta quae sumpsimus
    in eius nos transforment imaginem,
    cuius claritatem gloriosa Transfiguratione
    manifestare voluisti.

    LITERAL VERSION:
    May the heavenly nourishments which we consumed,
    transform us, O Lord, we beseech You, into the image of Him,
    whose splendor You desired to make manifest in the glorious Transfiguration.

    Consider the splendor of the transfigured Lord. His humanity was for a moment suffused with the brilliance of His divine nature. God desires to share with us His own gloria, His claritas, His splendor. Jesus reveals something of what He will be after His Passion, but also what we will be. Let us not forget the words of the Second Vatican Council, in a key passage deeply influenced by the late Pope John Paul II when he was a young bishop participating in the preparation of Gaudium et spes 22 (emphasis mine):

    The truth is that only in the mystery of the incarnate Word does the mystery of man take on light. For Adam, the first man, was a figure of Him Who was to come, namely Christ the Lord. Christ, the final Adam, by the revelation of the mystery of the Father and His love, fully reveals man to man himself and makes his supreme calling clear. … He Who is "the image of the invisible God" (Col. 1:15), is Himself the perfect man. To the sons of Adam He restores the divine likeness which had been disfigured from the first sin onward. Since human nature as He assumed it was not annulled, that very fact it has been raised up to a divine dignity in our respect too. For by His incarnation the Son of God has united Himself in some fashion with every man. … Such is the mystery of man, and it is a great one, as seen by believers in the light of Christian revelation. Through Christ and in Christ, the riddles of sorrow and death grow meaningful. Apart from His Gospel, they overwhelm us. Christ has risen, destroying death by His death; He has lavished life upon us so that, as sons in the Son, we can cry out in the Spirit: Abba, Father!

     

    The Transfiguration of the Lord teaches us more fully about ourselves and our calling. This ties in perfectly with the Eucharist, which when we receive It properly is. Unlike the ordinary bread we convert into who we are by consuming it, the spiritual food of the Eucharist transforms us more and more in what He is. Perhaps we can for a moment imagine after a good Holy Communion our hearts momentarily transfigured by God’s eternal glory, making our hearts like unto His.

    • • • • • •
    Powered by: Luke 5:1-11 and WordPress