o{]:)

Fr. Z is also Moderator of the Catholic Online Forum and the (now dormant) ASK FATHER Question Box. The WDTPRS columns appear weekly in The Wanderer. Fr. Z is available for retreats and conferences.

* E-MAIL
* TWITTER: @fatherz
LOGIN or REGISTER




VOTE!

My site was nominated for Best Religion Blog!


   Fr. Z on WDTPRS

↑ Grab this Headline Animator


Recent Posts
  • "INEFFABLE" ALERT!
  • So near and yet...
  • 6 Nov - NYC - Solemn TLM Requiem - Guardian Angels
  • USCCB: money-laundering for abortion
  • Group of Pro-Life Dems promise to KILL Health Care Bill
  • John Allen analyzes Pope Benedict's outreach to SSPX and Anglicans
  • Archbp. Nienstedt (Archd. StP/Mpls) on new translation
  • Brick by brick via real Requiem Masses

  • Recent Comments:

    • So near and yet… (2)
    • Kill The Bill (8)
      • Timothy Mulligan: From Wikipedia: “Bachmann is a member of a church that is part of the Wisconsin Evangelical...
      • Fr. A.M.: Forgive my ignorance, but who is that woman ? ‘Wonder Woman’ ????
    • John Allen analyzes Pope Benedict’s outreach to SSPX and Anglicans (12)
      • robkphd: Father, I know that you like Mr Allen, and I respect that. However, I often find his analysis focusing on...
    • “INEFFABLE” ALERT! (8)
      • Mark M: Father: I hope you do not mind me adjectiving a few nouns! “A pithy argument would be against the cult...
      • Virgil: They CONGREGATE each Sunday for the SURREPTICOUS rites, in the PITH of which they know the MEDIOCRE nature of...
      • BLC: Last I heard it was in a homily, referring to the hypostatic union. Made me think of these posts too!
      • seanl: I’ve come across it in several readings for my Patristics class this semester. Always think of these...
      • Lurker 59: Mediocre men surreptitiously cauterized sacred chant pithly preached ineffable congregator ian c.
    • Beatification of John Paul II… not yet (43)
      • mfg: No headlong rushes please. It is crucial to bring back the ‘devil’s advocate’. What about JP2...

  • The Z-Cam in the Sabine Chapel is ON AIR!Z-Cam and Radio Sabina: LIVE

    Visit the WDTPRS Stores!
    Buy WDTPRS stuff!

    Calendar

    September 2007
    S M T W T F S
    « Aug   Oct »
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    30  


    Subscribe to ... The Wanderer

    Subscribe to ... The Catholic Herald - UK





    This blog is hosted by

    Joyent

    Thanks for the support!

    2009 Catholic New Media Awards Winner

    * Best Blog by a Cleric
    * Best Written Blog
    * Most Informative Blog
    * People's Choice Blog
    * Best Podcast by a Cleric
    * Best Podcast by a Man
    * Best Podcast by a Religious
    * Best Produced Podcast
    * Best Video Podcast
    * Funniest Podcast
    * Most Entertaining Podcast
    * Most Informative Podcast
    * Most Spiritual Podcast
    * People's Choice Podcast
    * Best Overall Catholic Website


    2008 Weblog Awards Winner

    2007 Weblog Awards Winner



    * Best Apologetic Blog
    * Best blog by Clergy
    * Best Individual Blog
    * Most Informative Blog
    * Best Insider News Blog
    * Smartest Blog
    * Most Spiritual Blog
    * Best Written Blog




    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Add to Google Reader or Homepage

    Add to My AOL

    Subscribe in Bloglines

    Powered by FeedBurner

    Fr. Z's Facebook page



    TwitterCounter for

    Where Fr. Z will be:
  • Upcoming Events:
  • Events
  • Buy Fr. Z a cup of coffee!





    Your support makes it possible for me to continue with this blog.




    My November goal...

    free counters



    30 September 2007

    Where is St. Jerome’s body?

    CATEGORY: NAPLAM, SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 6:02 pm

    I posted this last year.  But I put so much work into it that it deserves recycling.

    Some time ago, there was a discussion on one of our splendid Catholic blogs making mention of the burial place of St. Jerome perhaps in the Major Basilica of St. Mary Major in Rome. This is an interesting story and I dug into it a little. This is what I found.

    We read in J.N.D. Kelly’s work Jerome: His Life, Writings, and Controversies (Duckworth, 1975, p. 333 – emphasis mine) :

    Apocryphal lives extolling [Jerome’s] sanctity, even his miracles, were quick to appear, and in the eighth century he was to be acclaimed, along with Ambrose, Augustine, and Gregory the Great, as one of the four Doctors of the Church.[2] In the middle ages his works were eagerly copied, read, and pillaged; while towards the end of the thirteenth century the clergy of Santa Maria Maggiore, at Rome, were to persuade the public, perhaps themselves too, that his remains had been transported from Bethlehem to Italy, and could be venerated close to certain presumed fragments of the Saviour’s crib.[3]

    Note 2: This was formally ratified by Pope Boniface VIII on 20 Sept. 1295: see Corpus iuris canonici II, 1059 (ed. E. Freidburg, Leipzig, 1879-81). The original number four (the list was later to be greatly expanded) was chosen so that the Doctors could match the Evangelists.

    Note 3: The story of their alleged translation, in response to a visionary appearance of Jerome himself, is set out by J. Stilting in Acta Sanctorum XLVI, Sept. VIII, 636 (Antwerp, 1762); it is reprinted in PL 22, 237-40. Stilting also provides a discussion of its date, veracity, etc. on pp. 635-49.

    In the Acta Sanctorum for 30 September, under the entry for St. Jerome, we find the following section with its articles:

    LXV. Corpus Sancti ex Palestina Romam translatum, depositumque in basilica s. Mariae Majoris. The body of the saint was brought to Rome from Palestine, and put in the Basilica of St. Mary Major.
    LXVI. Inquiritur tempus quo Sancti corpus Romam delatum. An investigation is made into the time when the body of the saint was brought back to Rome.
    LXVII. Corpus Sancti depositum prope aediculam Praesepis, conditum deinde ibidem altare, sub quo positum, ubi mansit usque ad pontificatum Sixti V, quando dicitur clanculum ablatum & absconditum. The body of the saint was placed near to the small chamber of the Crib, established then right at the same altar, under which it was placed, where it remained until the pontificate of Sixtus V, when it is said to have been secretly taken away and hidden.
    LXVIII. Corpus Sancti clanculum ablatum & absconditum dicitur, ne transferretur alio a Sixto V: deinde frequenter frustra quaesitum. The body of the saint is said to have been secretly taken away and hidden lest it were to be transferred to another place by Sixtus V: aftward it is frequently sought in vain.
    LXIX. An reliquae, sub altari principe S. Mariae Majoris inventae, videantur illae ipsae, quae ut corpus S. Hieronymi ad illam basilicam fuerunt translatae. When the relics found under the main altar of St. Mary Major which had been transferred to that Basilica seem to be the very same as the body of St. Jerome.
    LXX. Admodum verisimile & probabile inventas esse S. Hieronymi. Clearly the [relics] found are most like and probably of Saint Jerome.
    LXXI. Respondetur ad objectionem ex reliquiis Nepesinis: reliquiae, quae verisimiliter sunt S. Hieronymi sub mensa principis altaris depositae. An objection is answered about the relics at Nepi: relics placed under the main altar which more than likely are those of St. Jerome.
    LXXII. Reliquiae Sancti in pluribus civitatibus Italiae, Galliae, Germaniae, Belgii, & aliis provinciis. The relics of the saint in more cities in Italy, France, Germany, Belgium and other provinces.
    LXXIII. Cultus S. Hieronymi: festivitates eius & Officia. The veneration of St. Jerome: his feasts and offices.

    Here is the page where these articles begin. If you want to have a fuller experience of the joys (the chore) of reading the Acta Sanctorum for any length of time click here for a larger image.

    • • • • • •

    Diocese of Fresno statement on Summorum Pontificum

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 11:59 am

    His Excellency Most Reverend John T. Steinbock of the Diocese of Fresno has made a statement about the application of the provisions in the Pope’s Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum.

    My emphases and comments.

     

    Mass in Latin

    Pastoral Message aired on KNXT-TV during October 2007

    Bishop John T. Steinbock, Diocese of Fresno

    My Dear People of God,

    The document Pope Benedict XVI issued on July 7 regarding the use of the Latin Mass, reformed and published with the authority of Pope John XXIII in 1962, took effect in the Universal Church on September 14 of this year.  The Holy Father declared that both this 1962 Latin [grrrrr] Mass, referred to as the Tridentine Mass, [I know people recognize this term, but… grrrrr] and the Mass we now celebrate, [Well… there are those for whom the older Mass is "the Mass we now celebrate".  Hey wait a minute… as of 14 September, the older is really is "the Mass we now celebrate" just as much as the newer form.] the Mass of Paul VI published in 1970, form one and the same Rite.

    The Holy Father has given permission to a priest, [This is incorrect.  The Motu Proprio is not constitutive.  It does not give permission.  It declares that priests have the use of either form if he already has permission (faculties) to say Mass at all. The Holy Father is declaring a fact rather than giving a permission.  This stems from the fact that the older form was never abrogated and it forms, at least juridically, part of one unified Roman Rite.] in Masses celebrated without the people, to celebrate the extraordinary form of 1962 in Latin, on his own authority.  He does not need permission of the Bishop.  Masses celebrated without people are private and non-scheduled Masses.  The Holy Father states that Christ’s faithful, with due observance of law, who spontaneously request it, may be admitted to these celebrations.

    In parishes where a group of faithful attached to the previous liturgical tradition exists stably,[this is still not a great translation, but it is better to say "exists stably" than to say "stable group"] if the pastor is able, he is asked to accede to their requests  [this is well put] for the celebration of the Mass according to the rite of the Roman Missal published in 1962.  If a group of lay faithful does not obtain what it requests from the pastor, it should inform the diocesan Bishop. If he cannot provide for this celebration, the Holy Father says that the matter should be referred to the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei.”

    As the Bishop of our Diocese, I have always allowed a Sunday Mass in Latin according to the 1962 Missal, both in the South and the North, the Bakersfield area and the Fresno area, for those people, coming from many different parishes, who have an attachment to the Mass in Latin. [grrrrr… I really think we need to make better distinctions.] I thank those priests who have provided this Mass through the years. [You’re welcome.  I was one of them for a short time when I was in Bakersfield.] It is a reality that there are very few priests left that are able to celebrate the Mass in Latin either in the ordinary or the extraordinary form.  [There will be a lot more real soon!]

    I cannot foresee, at this time, a regular Sunday Mass in Latin in any other parishes, unless the pastor of a parish is personally able and willing to celebrate this Mass in Latin.  [This is the key, of course.  It is the pastor who deals with this question.]  Most priests are already celebrating two, three and sometimes four Masses, both on Saturdays and Sundays.  As the Bishop, I also have to tell everyone, quite frankly, that because of the shortage of priests, we are now preparing to have some of our parishes staffed, not by a priest, but by a Permanent Deacon, a Religious, or a Lay Person, who will be called a “Parish Life Coordinator.”  [Ouch.  This is a sad reality in some places.  In these cases, it is understandable that it would be very hard indeed to implement a regular celebration of the older Mass in a parish without a pastor.] This person will be in charge of leading the parish community, with a priest coming to celebrate Mass and hear Confessions when available.

    Hopefully, the document of the Holy Father will have a significant impact in Europe, where relatively few faithful are coming to Mass on Sunday.  [Yes… we hope it will have a big impact on Europe.  We also hope that it will have an impact everywhere else too.  The Church everywhere needs renewal.]  Here in our Diocese, our parish churches, with multiple Masses, are filled with people, who experience a vibrant and devotional Sunday Liturgy.  [So wonderful that there can be no benefit from the provisions of Summorum Pontificum?  This makes it sound as if everything is just right in the Diocese of Fresno.  I suspect there are also issues there also.]  We are blest, in so many ways, but we are in great need of priests.  Let us pray for vocations especially from within our parish communities.   +

     

    In the balance, this is a very good statement.  The bishop acknowledges that the pastor is the one who makes determinations about regular public celebrations in his parish.  He doesn’t seek to impose restrictions outside the provisions of the MP.  At the same time, he underscores the hard reality of things: there is a shortage of priests.

    At the end, he makes an odd observation.  He seems to be saying that the MP is really intended for Europe, and doesn’t seem to be very relevant for the Diocese of Fresno.  He seems to be saying that the situation is great in the parishes there, which are full and vibrant.  This suggests that the reason the Holy Father gave us the MP was to help Mass attendance in those places where it is low (i.e., Europe, but not the San Joquin Valley).  However, in the previous paragraph the bishop explains that they are actually facing a dire situation: there is a shortage of priests.  It seems to me that things are decidedly un-wonderful where there are not enough priests for parishes.  Things are actually precarious if parishes have to be entrusted to lay custodians in the absence of priests.

    I am convinced that the Motu Proprio is very much focused on the priest, his role and his identity.  The priest builds up the Church around himself at the altar.  He shapes the laity who then shape the world.  By renewing the identity of the priest by the derestriction of the older form of Mass, the Holy Father is also offering, I think, another way to increase priestly vocations. 

    In any event, it is not my intention to pick at this statement, which is really pretty good.

    Let us hope the people of that diocese will encourage vocations to the priesthood and give support to the priests they have.

    • • • • • •

    A converting Episcopalian grieves: “…miasmal excrescences of Marty Haugen and David Haas…”

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 10:47 am

    I tip my biretta to the always engaging Diogenes for the links to what follows. 

    Another Episcopalian has decided he can no longer endure the self-destruct mode that Church is vigorously wrapped up in.  So, he is swimming the Tiber.  Here is what he thinks about that.

    So it’s off to Rome for me. I do not labor under the illusion all is milk and honey on the other side of the Tiber. It is not, the Roman Catholic Church, especially in the United States, is beset with woes, lousy liturgy and music being among the less egregious. But the Holy Catholic Church possesses something the Episcopal Church does not: sound doctrine, along with a Pope (especially the present one) and magisterium to ensure that it remains so. Sound doctrine will make it possible for me (I pray) to tolerate Masses where the priest sits in the Captain Kirk chair while the miasmal excrescences of Marty Haugen and David Haas [ROFL!] waft into the nave. And while my heartbreak over what happened to the Episcopal Church will remain with me to the end of my days (as I suspect it will for Fr. Kimel), at the same time I look forward with great joy to embracing the full Catholic Faith. I ask your prayers.

     

    You’ve got em, and those of many of my readers. 

    • • • • • •

    Benedict’s Pontifical Mass in St. Peter’s? Maybe 2 December

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 10:14 am

    Corriere della Sera’s Luigi Accatoli has an article about the possibility of Pope Benedict celebrating Mass in the Basilica of St. Peter with the extraordinary use of the Roman Rite he derestricted with Summorum Pontificum.

    Accatoli raises the interesting question of what would be done to substitute the old papal courtiers, abolished by Paul VI. 

    Here are a couple excerpts (in my translation):

    No Pontiff has usd the old Missal for 40 years: it could happen on 2 December

    Luigi Accattoli

    CITTÀ DEL VATICANO  – A new direction for culture and rites in the Vatican: Yesterday the Pope nominated Giovanni Maria Vian director of L’Osservatore Romano and consecrated as bishop the Milanese priset Gianfranco Ravasi who will have the role of "minister of culture"; in the next few days there is awaited the nomination of the new "master of ceremonies" to replace Archbishop Piero Marini.  After the arrival of the new master of ceremonies it is "probable" that the Pope will celebrate a Mass with the old rite, in St. Peter’s, obviously entirely in Latin: it could happen in 2 December, the first Sunday of Advent.
    ...
    Nothing precise is known about the Pope’s intention to give bishops an "example" of his own choice to use the older rite, byeond the reception of requests of the faithful, as the Motu Proprio he published in July provides.  The rumor is circulating both on the lips of those who hope in such a gesture, which says that he would definitively clear "through customs" the old Missal which is still encountering resistance in spite of the recent derestriction; and also among those who fear that the Pope is making the gesture because it would be "another step away from the Council".

    "Right now it’s only a rumor", says a monsignor who is neither for or against it, "but everyone is talking about it around here and I believe he is going to do it even if he risks stirring up some polemics, because Catholics who are less than 50 years old have never seen a Pope celebrate Mass with his back to the people and speaking the ‘Eucharistic Prayer’ in a low voice."  In the meantime, the ‘court’ which accompanied the Pope in these celebrations was abolished and I really want to see how an old papal Mass would be carried out today!"
    ....

     

    • • • • • •

    The Jersey Journal: “it is not a ’social event,’ but communion with God”

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 8:02 am

    The Jersey Journal has an article on the implementation of the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum in

    My emphases and comments.

    Church celebrates a return to traditional mass in Latin
    Monday, September 24, 2007
    By CHARLES HACK
    JOURNAL STAFF WRITER

    At a solemn Latin Mass yesterday, the Holy Rosary Church in Jersey City heralded the return to favor of the once universal language of Christianity.  [Tell that to the Eastern Churches!]

    The Sixth Street church yesterday held its first traditional Latin Mass to be officiated by a bishop [HUZZAH!] in almost 40 years, church officials said. Dom Carillo Gritti, bishop of Itacoatiara, Brazil, presided over the pontifical Mass just over a week after Pope Benedict XVI’s issued a "motu proprio" allowing priests to perform Latin Mass without permission of the bishop.  [Yep.]

    The Latin Mass fell out of favor in the 1960s when the Church allowed Catholics to celebrate Mass in their local language. [What a wretched sentence.] The Rev. Rino Lavaroni, Holy Rosary’s pastor, conducts a traditional Latin Mass every Sunday, but this is the first time a bishop has officiated [Second time this word was used.  Odd.] over it since the 1960s.

    Gritti sees the Pope’s order as an inevitable return to a centuries long tradition that saw a gap in the last few decades.

    "Finally we have started again what was there forever," Gritti said. "We have to see this continuity in the Catholic Church."

    "We can start the renewal that will transform our church and that will be the salvation for every person," Lavaroni added. "We are starting a new chapter with great enthusiasm."  [This guy gets it.]

    Apart from the language, there are other differences to the service, Lavaroni said, including the fact that the celebrant does not face the people during prayer, because it is not a "social event," but communion with God.  [LOL!   Yep!  He does get it.]

    Born in Bergamo in northern Italy, Gritti did most of his training in seminary there. But for more than 30 years, he has been in the Amazons in Brazil. A trained civil engineer, Gritti supervised the construction of his parish church and a local hospital.
    The good thing in this article is that the priest clearly sees the connection between the use of the older form of Mass and the renewal we need in the Church.

    • • • • • •

    Pawtucket Times: Introibo ad altare Dei

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 7:54 am

    Here is an interesting piece from the Pawtucket Times.

    My emphases and com[]ments.

    09/28/2007
    Introibo ad altare Dei (I will go in to the altar of God)
    By DONNA KENNY KIRWAN

    [CLICHE ALERT!] PAWTUCKET - St. Leo the Great Church will be going back in time. Using a 1962 pre-Vatican II missal, the Rev. Kevin Fisette will celebrate Sunday Mass in Latin on Oct. 21 at 5 p.m.
    The pastor will be wearing traditional vestments and during much [I hope all...] of the Mass, will be standing with his back to the congregation. Worshippers will have to kneel to receive Holy Communion, and the host will be placed on the tongue.
    In one other notable difference, Father Fisette will be assisted by altar boys – no girls allowed.  [Isn’t it wonderful?]
    While this hasn’t met with any resistance from parishioners, he did admit that one of his female altar servers, perhaps only half jokingly, responded with "Hey, that’s not fair!" when told of the Latin Mass rules.  [Poor little darlings.  But, perhaps one’s sense of "fair" needs to be adjusted.]
    St. Leo’s, at 697 Central Ave., is the second church in Rhode Island to offer the Tridentine Mass. The other is Holy Name of Jesus Church in Providence, which has been offering the Mass for almost a decade by special permission from church authorities.
    Earlier this year, Pope Benedict XVI lifted Vatican restrictions on the celebration of the Latin Mass, paving the way for more parishes to offer the traditional rite. However, as Father Fisette pointed out, there are many specific rules and regulations associated with it, which have been outlined by the Most Rev. Thomas Tobin, Bishop of Providence.  [Ehem… Summorum Pontificum doesn’t impose a lot of regulations.  I don’t think I have seen the "regulations" issued by the bishop of Providence.  Maybe someone will send them to me.]
    "Bishop Tobin made it clear we can not mix rites, do a little of the old Mass and a little of the new," said Father Fisette. "Everything will be just as it was in 1962." He added that Bishop Tobin has been "extremely supportive" of his plan.
    Father Fisette said he is excited about offering the Latin Mass and hopes that it will generate enthusiasm among his own parishioners, and perhaps attract some that are new.
    Noting that weekly Mass attendance among Catholics has dropped about 40 percent in the last 40 years, Father Fisette said, "We have to do whatever we can to bring people back."
    Father Fisette, who has been a priest for 26 years, said he realizes there are some who consider the practice a sign of the church going backwards.
    He and other supporters of the Tridentine Mass view it as a return to a time of more sacred, traditional church values that were in place prior to the Second Vatican Council.  [I think it is a step into the future, not into the past.]
    "Sometimes, I think we have lost a sense of the sacred. It’s all become very familiar," he said. "We would like to bring back the sense of mystery, if you will – back when people were more in awe of the Mass." He added that the Latin Mass celebration offers more in the way of "spiritual drama."  [All good insights.]
    Commenting on the longtime practice of the priest turning his back to the congregation, [grrrrr] Father Fisette said that traditional thinking held that the old Mass was, essentially, the "priest’s prayer on behalf of the people who were gathered."
    In contrast, the new Mass is centered around the idea that all of the people celebrate the Mass with the priest.  [Hmmm… well… this is true, though, isn’t it?   The baptized participate in their own way in Christ’s priesthood and unite their spiritual sacrifices to those of the priest during Mass, any Mass.]
    Father Fisette said he sees the Latin Mass [grrrrr] as providing parishioners with another option of a traditional Catholic Mass.
    "The Church is certainly big enough for different types of Masses. It is big enough for everybody’s spirituality," he said. "We have guitar Masses and Gregorian chants, why not the Latin Mass?" [grrrrrr]
    Before arriving at St. Leo’s, Father Fisette was pastor of Holy Name Church, where he celebrated the weekly Tridentine Mass for seven years. He said that at Holy Name, there was a great deal of interest in the Latin Mass, even attracting a younger segment of the parishioners.
    Father Fisette admits he is no Latin scholar, having only taken a couple of years of the ancient language in high school. However, when he was assigned to Holy Name in 1997, he decided to learn it himself. He said he used his mother’s old missal and watched a videotape as a guide. "I was tongue-tied at first, but I found that it was fairly easy to learn," he said.
    He said he still intends to deliver his homily in English, however.  [HAR HAR HAR… insert knee slap here.  What a clever reporter!]
    Because of all the different rules and practices involving the Latin Mass, Fisette said he plans to hold an instructional session for parishioners on Wednesday, Oct. 17, at 6:30 p.m. in St. Leo’s Church.  [An excellent idea.]
    Following the inaugural Mass on Oct. 21, Father Fisette plans to celebrate a 5 p.m. Latin Mass on the third Sunday of each month for one year, to see if it catches on with parishioners. "I feel optimistic that it will," he stated.

     

    All in all very positive news.  I like the fact that the bishop is supportive and that the priest will have sessions for the parish about the older form of Mass.  Also, I like Fr. Fisette’s interest in bringing people back to the Church.   This must be a priority for us now. 

    • • • • • •

    29 September 2007

    “… growing familiarity with Benedict has not translated into higher approval ratings…”

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 3:21 pm

    Here is an interesting piece from the nearly ubiquitous John L. Allen, Jr., the former Roman correspondent for the lefty NCR.   Get this.

    My emphases.

     

    Benedict XVI’s approval rating in America is 73 percent, poll finds By John L Allen Jr Daily Created Sep 25 2007 – 12:14

    By JOHN L. ALLEN JR.
    New York

    Nearly three-quarters of Americans, 73 percent, who say they’re familiar enough with Pope Benedict XVI to offer an opinion have a favorable view of the pontiff, according to a new poll. Benedict scored well not just among Catholics, but also white Evangelicals, black Protestants, and mainline Protestants.

    The survey, conducted by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life and released today, offers the pope good news ahead of a projected 2008 visit to the United States.

    To a considerable extent, the pope’s popularity crosses the normal American partisan divide. While 84 percent of Americans who describe themselves as conservative Republicans have a favorable view of the pope, 59 percent of self-described liberal Democrats also give Benedict XVI high marks. Benedict scored well among virtually every ideological subgroup, from a 68 percent approval rating among independents to 79 percent approval among conservative and moderate Democrats.

    There are several fine points, however, that complicate the picture.

    First, Benedict’s approval rating is substantially lower than comparable figures for his predecessor, John Paul II, who was viewed favorably by 86 percent of Americans in a 1996 poll. Benedict XVI also trails John Paul’s 1996 numbers in terms of the percentage of Americans who say they have a “very favorable” impression, at 21 percent for Benedict and 32 percent for John Paul II.

    The gap is especially evident among Catholics; while 50 percent of American Catholics had a very favorable view of John Paul in 1996, just 36 percent express that impression of Benedict XVI today.

    Second, growing familiarity with Benedict has not translated into higher approval ratings. In 2005, just 55 percent of the American public told Pew Forum pollsters that they knew enough about the pope to offer an opinion, while this time 68 percent volunteered an impression. Yet over that time, Benedict’s approval rating actually dropped from 81 percent to 73 percent, suggesting that some Americans who have come to know the pope over the last two years don’t necessarily like what they see.

    Third, a plurality of Americans, 46 percent, say that Benedict XVI is doing only a “fair or poor job” in promoting relationships with other religions, while just 38 percent say he’s doing an “excellent or good” job.

    Though the Pew Forum report does not draw the conclusion, that result likely reflects continuing fallout from Benedict XVI’s September 2006 lecture at the University of Regensburg in Bavaria, which sparked protest across the Islamic world when Benedict quoted a 14th century Byzantine Emperor to the effect that Muhammad had “brought things only evil and inhuman.” It may also reflect negative reaction in the Protestant world to a recent Vatican declaration that the Catholic church remains the lone “true church” founded by Jesus Christ.

    A solid majority of Americans, 56 percent, describe Benedict XVI as “conservative" and just 5 percent see him as "liberal." Among college graduates, fully 71 percent say the pope is “conservative.” Likewise, 68 percent of American Catholics describe the pope as "conservative."

    LOL!

    I once asked Joseph Card. Ratzinger how he dealt with all the negative press all the time.  He responded that if he didn’t read something awful about himself every week, he’d have to examine his conscience.

    Pope Benedict has been applying needed medicine to some sick sectors of the Church.  As as St. Augustine described many centuries ago, "The doctor doesn’t stop cutting just because his patient is screaming for him to stop."

    • • • • • •

    Marini vixit, vivat Marini - a new papal M.C.

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 2:34 pm

    That might be a little exaggeration, but the Italian journalist Andrea Tornielli has posted on his blog Sacri Palazzi:

    The nomination of Msgr. Guido Marini, of the clergy of Genoa, as head of the Office of liturgical celebrations of the Pope, replacing [Archbishop] Piero Marini (who will be nominated as head of the Pontifical Commission for Eucharistic Congresses) will be announced at the beginning of the coming week (probably even Monday). Guido Marini will take possession of the appointment after 21 October, that is, after the Pope’s visit to Naples. But on that occasion he will already be present together with [his] predecessor.

    La nomina di mons. Guido Marini, del clero di Genova, a capo dell’Ufficio delle celebrazioni liturgiche del Papa, in sostituzione di mons. Piero Marini (che sarà nominato a capo del Pontificio comitato per i Congressi eucaristici) sarà annunciata all’inizio della settimana entrante (probabilmente già lunedì). Guido Marini prenderà possesso dell’incarico dopo il 21 ottobre, cioè dopo la visita del Papa a Napoli. Ma già in quella occasione dovrebbe essere presente insieme al predecessore.

    I think not a few of us will be getting up pretty early on Monday to read the appointments.

    Fr. Finigan says:
    As the former Archbishop of Southwark, Most Rev Michael Bowen, once said in response to a rumour, "For all I know, it may very well be true."

    • • • • • •

    Angelic details

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 2:03 pm

    Today, as last year, in the chapel of the Sabine Farm, Holy Mass was celebrated with the 1962 Missale Romanum.  The vestments were appropriately angelic and festive. After all, the chapel was filled also with angels.

    Here is a little detail woven into the fabric of the chasuble:

    • • • • • •

    Catholic New York on “Solemn Joy”: a very pleasant article

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 1:26 pm

    Here is a nice article from Catholic New York.


    My emphases and comments.

    Solemn Joy

    Traditional Latin Mass community celebrates pope’s decree

    By CLAUDIA McDONNELL

    Reverence and devotion filled the air like incense [There is really something very different about the atmosphere of the older Mass, no?  Even without the incense.  Still, you can almost see and smell it in the air.] at the Tridentine Mass Sept. 16 at Immaculate Conception parish in Sleepy Hollow. There was extra joy, too, because of the occasion. The traditional Latin Mass is celebrated there on Sundays and holy days, but this was the first one after Pope Benedict’s decree granting wider permission to celebrate the traditional Mass went into effect Sept. 14.

    "It’s wonderful," Anne Meeks said. "We think very highly of Pope Benedict. We’re very grateful." [It is very important to express gratitude to your priests and bishops about the older Mass.  Very important.] Mrs. Meeks, who lives in Croton-on-Hudson with her husband, Michael, and is expecting their third child, attended the Mass with their daughters, Mary, 4, and Katherine, 15 months; her husband was at work.

    "We love the Tridentine Mass," she said. "We feel it’s extremely reverent. We love the beauty of it."  [There are a lot more reasons than the beauty, though that is a very good start… and they are tied together.]

    The Tridentine Mass is celebrated at a number of other churches of the archdiocese, and several people at Immaculate Conception expressed gratitude to Cardinal Egan for making it available. They also thanked Msgr. Louis J. Mazza, pastor of Immaculate Conception, for welcoming them to the parish.  [Yes… everyone… do thank people.]

    "He has always been so good to us," said Amy Kelley of Mount Kisco. "He really recognized the legitimacy of our attachment (to the Tridentine form)...He took us under his wing."

    Msgr. Mazza told CNY, "They are a good, loving, Christian community." Though geographically scattered, "when they come together they have a lovely family atmosphere," [There is that unmeasureable sense again.] he said, and the children of some of the families receive baptism, first Communion and confirmation at Immaculate Conception.

    Msgr. Mazza expressed support for the pope’s decree and said that interest in the traditional Latin Mass "is not dying, it’s growing."  [Yep.] But, he added, "Not every parish has a priest who can say a Latin Mass."

    The regular celebrant at Immaculate Conception is Father Richard Munkelt, a priest of the Diocese of Scranton who teaches philosophy at Fairfield University in Connecticut. He said in an interview that he is "deeply grateful and overjoyed" by the pope’s action in making the Tridentine Mass more available.

    "It’s a very important step in the direction of keeping the Church in touch with its liturgical past and heritage," [continuity] he said.

    He said that the Tridentine Mass gives worshippers "a sense of the sacred, and a sense of what solemn worship is about…It’s about giving glory to God using our highest talents, in the highest artistic and intellectual manner imaginable."  [We will see a revival of many of our very best traditions of music and of art.  For two millennia the Church was the greatest patroness of the arts there ever was.  Holy Church has given to all humanity two great gifts: art and saints.  Saints express God’s truth and beauty in living, breathing people.  Art is like God’s grandchild, an expression of God’s children about His beauty and truth in the material things around us.  The holiness of saints and the beauty of art flow out of and back into Holy Mass.]

    The Mass on Sept. 16 had the solemnity and formality [We must recover a sense of what Dante expresses with the Italian word "cortese", a "courtliness" of noble formality and courtesy in the face of mystery and majesty.] that older worshippers recall, and that most younger worshippers do not—and would likely find unusual and perhaps fascinating. Father Munkelt, wearing emerald-green silk vestments trimmed in gold, marched into the Gothic-style church accompanied by eight altar boys, one of whom held up the edge of the priest’s cape. After going up to the sanctuary, Father Munkelt turned and walked back down the aisle, sprinkling the congregation with holy water. Then he returned to the sanctuary and, assisted by altar boys, removed the cape and put on a chasuble. He then began the prayers of the Mass.

    Singing throughout the Mass was the group’s schola cantorum, or choir. It is made up of two professional musicians—including the director, David Hughes—and six volunteers. They sang Gregorian chant superbly. Some of the people joined in the singing of Mass prayers such as the Agnus Dei, as well as the responses to the priest’s prayers. When he sang "Dominus vobiscum" ("The Lord be with you") they responded, "Et cum spiritu tuo" ("And with your spirit").

    According to the Tridentine form, the priest celebrates the Mass while facing the altar, that is, with his back to the people, so that all face the same direction, which traditionally is the East, symbolic of the Resurrection. [That covers the bases.] After reading the Epistle and Gospel at the altar in Latin, Father Munkelt read both from the pulpit in English. He then preached a homily in which he called on all to cultivate the virtue of humility and the realization of "our complete dependence on Christ."

    Worshippers followed the Mass in attentive and reverent silence; small children were present throughout, but they made little noise. At communion, all knelt to receive the Eucharist on the tongue.

    Immediately following the end of Mass, the schola sang the Te Deum in gratitude for the pope’s decree.

    Speaking with CNY after the Mass, Father Munkelt, 51, said that his vocation was inspired by the Tridentine Mass. Formerly an Episcopalian, he was received into the Catholic Church in 1983 and began to attend the Tridentine Mass at St. Agnes Church in Manhattan, "out of intellectual curiosity," he said, about the Church’s liturgical heritage. At St. Agnes, he continued, "I felt a calling to the priesthood and the altar." He is in residence at St. Anthony of Padua Chapel in West Orange, N.J., where all Masses, as well as the sacraments, are celebrated according to the Tridentine form. The chapel operates with authorization from the Archdiocese of Newark.

    Commenting on the use of Latin, he noted that it is "the historical language of worship in the Roman rite."  [We need more thought about the language of worship.  The great scholar Christine Mohrmann wrote of Latin as a hierarchical language.  I wish I could scare up that reference again.]

    "The beauty of Latin," he said, "is that it helps to take the worship out of the world of the ordinary," [Yes!  No liturgy is about the merely secular.] emphasizing its "mystery and sacredness." He remarked that "everyone is capable of understanding the words of the Mass through vernacular translations."

    Asked whether making the Tridentine Mass more available could lead to divisiveness in the Church, Father Munkelt said, "The key point in this question is the fact that the Church has always been liturgically pluralistic. It has many rites. There have been different rites and usages within the fold of the Western, or Latin, Church. Divisiveness comes in only when a legitimate expression has been suppressed or frustrated."  ["Legitimate expression".  The Novus Ordo is legitimate expression only when celebrated according to the rubrics.]

    Frederic Wolff, 69, told CNY that he still remembers the Latin responses he made as an altar boy. "The Latin Mass, for me, is my mother tongue in worship," [There is that language thing again.] he said.

    Joanne Riccoboni, 43, of Brewster attends the Mass regularly with her husband, Gene, and their four children. Like many of the women there, she wore a lace mantilla. She recalled how she felt when she first attended a traditional Latin Mass as an adult.

    "Tears just filled my eyes, and I had goose bumps all over," she said. "I had been away from Mass for a long time, and it brought me back. I just felt at home again."

     

    • • • • • •

    PODCAzT 45: Augustine on pastors; my Motu Proprio sermon in England; chapel veils

    CATEGORY: NAPLAM, PODCAzT, SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 11:59 am

    It has been almost a month since the last PODCAzT.  My travels and time restrictions have kept me busy.  But today we listen to St. Augustine of Hippo talk about shepherds in union with Christ.

    Also, I have provided a sound recording of my sermon on 14 September about the Exaltation of the Cross and about the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum.  It was delivered in Blackfen, Kent, in England at a Solemn Mass at Our Lady of the Rosary Church where Fr. Finigan of the blog The Hermeneutic of Continuity is pastor.

    A reader of WDTPRS sent in a voicemail question about whether it is necessary for women to wear chapel veils at Mass with the so-called "Tridentine" Missal, the Missale Romanum of 1962.

     
    icon for podpress  07-09-28 Augustine on pastors; my Motu Proprio sermon in England; chapel veils [46:49m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

    http://wdtprs.com/podcazt/07_09_28.mp3 
    044 07-08-27 St. Monica dies, Augustine weeps; Pope Benedict greets American seminarians
    043 07-08-23 Benedict XVI on Mass “toward the Lord” and a prayer by St. Augustine
    042 07-08-10 St. Augustine on St. Lawrence and how to be a Christian
    041 07-08-09 Ratzinger on liturgical silence; silent Eucharist Prayer
    040 07-08-02 Eusebius of Vercelli in exile; my column in on detractors of Summorum Pontificum
    039 07-07-27 St. Augustine on Christ the Mediator; “for all” or “for many”?
    038 07-07-25 Ratzinger on “active participation”; The Sabine Farm; Merry del Val’s music
    037 07-07-18 The position of the altar and the priest’s “back to the people”

    • • • • • •

    28 September 2007

    Where are you?

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 8:27 am

    It has been a while since I’ve posted one of these "where are you" entries.  Here is a snapshot of the last few minutes.   These places are not precise.  Someone living in St. Ipsidipsy might actually be registered on the internet backbone through Black Duck, or Tall Tree, if you get what I mean.

    Here we go!

    New Orleans, Louisiana
    Binghamton, New York
    Woodstock, Georgia
    Vancouver, Washington
    Auburn University, Alabama
    Munro, Buenos Aires
    Tallahassee, Florida
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Canton, Ohio
    Staten Island, New York
    Nottingham
    Irving, Texas
    Nashville, Tennessee
    London, Lambeth
    Notre Dame, Indiana
    Saint Paul, Minnesota
    Jakarta, Jawa Barat
    Berkeley, California    
    Roma, Lazio  [PONTIFICIO COLLEGIO AMERICANO DEL NORD ter Network]
    Emmitsburg, Maryland  [Mount St. Mary Seminary?]
    La Storta, Lazio
    Minneapolis, Minnesota
    Plaistow, West Sussex
    Quezon City
    Gladwyne, Pennsylvania
    Holzgerlingen, Baden-Wu…
    Saint Peters, Missouri
    Grand Rapids, Michigan
    Los Angeles, California
    Kansas City, Missouri
    Paulo, Maranhao
    Leatherhead, Bromley
    Pharr, Texas
    Moorhead, Minnesota
    Colfax, Indiana
    Johnston, Iowa
    Geneva, Geneve
    Poughkeepsie, New York
    Saginaw, Michigan
    Detroit, Michigan
    Arlington, Virginia
    Saint Louis, Missouri [Kendrick-Glennon Seminary?]
    Saint Paul, Minnesota [Univ. of St. Thomas…. St. Paul Seminary?]
    Leeds
    Hyde Park, Massachusetts
    Philipsburg, La Massana
    Wisconsin Rapids, Wisco…
    Bend, Oregon
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana
    Waterloo, Ontario
    Toronto, Ontario
    San Antonio, Texas
    Stamford, Connecticut
    Merrill, Wisconsin
    Stockholm, Stockholms Lan
    Midlothian, Virginia
    Gibson, Tennessee
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Anderson, South Carolina
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Madrid  
    Bloomfield Hills, Michi…
    Lincoln, Nebraska
    Blacklick, Ohio
    Groesbeek, Gelderland
    Iowa City, Iowa
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    South Hadley, Massachus…
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Palo Alto, California
    North Little Rock, Arka…
    Daytona Beach, Florida
    Mankato, Minnesota
    Leavenworth, Kansas
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Preston, Washington
    Columbus, Ohio [Josephinum?]
    Hyattsville, Maryland
    Philadelphia, Pennsylva… [St Charles Borromeo Seminary?]
    New Haven, Connecticut
    Tampa, Florida
    Bethlehem, Georgia
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
    Newton Junction, New Ha…
    Winnipeg, Manitoba
    West Chester, Ohio
    Silver Spring, Maryland
    Philippine, Benguet
    Columbia, South Carolina
    Naples, Florida
    Seattle, Washington
    Dublin
    West Des Moines, Iowa
    San Jose, California
    Saint John, New Brunswick
    Washington, District of…
    Celina, Ohio
    Alexandria, Virginia
    Damascus, Maryland
    Fayetteville, Georgia
    Emmitsburg, Maryland
    Bethesda, Maryland
    Royal Oak, Michigan
    Richmond, Virginia
    Singapore, Dakar
    Indian Trail, North Car…
    Holzgerlingen, Baden-Wu…
    Des Plaines, Illinois
    Eccles, Trafford
    Richardson, Texas
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
    Kista, Stockholms Lan
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida
    Emmitsburg, Maryland
    Ithaca, New York
    Front Royal, Virginia
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    [Mt. St. Mary of the West Seminary?]
    Chestnut Hill, Massachu…
    Johnstown, Pennsylvania
    My special greetings go out to seminarians reading the blog!
       
    • • • • • •

    German Bishops issue guidelines for Summorum Pontificum

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 7:25 am

    The Bishops of Germany have issued a statement about the implementation of the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum.  It is available at kreuz.net.

    The following translation is from cathcon.

    My emphases and comments.

        Guidelines of the German Bishops for the Traditional Latin Mass

        1. The possibility for the celebration of Mass in the extraordinary form must be carried forward under the leadership of the Bishop [I believe that in parishes it is the pastor, the parish priest, who makes the determination.  At least that is what SP 5.1 says.] by the principle of harmony between the interests and well-being of the Faithful making the request and the orderly care of souls. The permission of the extraordinary form may not reinforce existing tensions or cause new division (see Summorum Pontificum Article 5 § 1).  [Consider this: tensions and divisions are aggravated even more by not responding favorably to petitions from the faithful for the older form of Mass, to which it would now seem people have a right to enjoy as a legitimate and venerable use of the one Roman Rite.]

    2. The ordinary form of the celebration of Mass is using the Missale Romanum 1970 (in the version of the Editio typica tertia 2002 and – up to the appearance of the German issue of the 3rd Edition – `the Missal for the Dioceses of the German speaking areas’ 2. 1988 Edition). For the extraordinary form of the celebration of Mass, the Missale Romanum 1962 (e.g. Editio juxta typicam Regensburg 1962, with Diocesan propers ) is to be used (see Summorum Pontificum Article 1).

        3. The Parish Mass is to be celebrated in the ordinary form. On Sundays, one Mass in the extraordinary form, in addition can be celebrated, not however replacing the Mass in the ordinary form (see Summorum Pontificum Article 5 § 2).

        4. The request for permission [odd phrase: "Den Antrag auf Genehmigung"] (in accordance with Summorum Pontificum Article 5 § 1) by groups of laymen (see Summorum Pontificum Article 7) can be made to the Parish Priest within a Parish and/or within a Parish organisation or a pastoral unit, which is the responsibility of a Parish Priest. If groups, however, consist of members of different Parishes and/or a Parish organisations or pastoral units, the request is to be addressed to the Diocesan bishop. [I know I have used this phrase before, but it seems especially appropriate now: "AUSWEIS, BITTE!"  How is this going to be confirmed?  Will people need to produce identification?]

        5. About the kind and size of the groups making the request, nothing is laid down, in order to be able to respond to the local conditions appropriately.  [At last some common sense about this.]

        6. The necessary suitability of the priests [Here we go!] for the celebration in the extraordinary form of the rite (see SP Article 5 § 4) is covered by the following requirements:

        – General suitability, which each priest must possess;  [This means that he has faculties and he is not impeded by law from saying Mass, etc.]

        – Acceptance of the whole liturgy of the Church in their ordinary and extraordinary forms (see accompanying letters of Pope Benedict XVI.);  [Not sure how this will be determined.  Will priests be required to sign an adhaesio fidei?]

        – Familiarity with the extraordinary form of the Rite;

        – Understanding of Latin. [How much?]

        The Diocesan Bishops will make, as required, provision available for continuing and further training for the acquisition of the familiarity with the extraordinary form of the Rite and for the acquisition of the necessary understanding of the Latin language. [This is pretty good.]

        7. The Parish Priest and/or Rector of a Church is not obliged, even if he possesses the suitability, to celebrate the Missale Romanum 1962. If he believes because of official burdens or for personal reasons that he is unable to meet the wishes of the Faithful, he should turn to the Diocesan bishop. The right of the Faithful in this matter (Summorum Pontificum Article 7) remains unaffected.  [First, this mentions the "right" of the faithful.  That is interesting.  Second, I am not sure that the parish priest doesn’t have some sort of obligation to help people who make petitions.  He might not be able to respond personally, but should take steps to find a priest, time, resources, etc.  If he can’t, then the bishop is on the spot.  Let’s see what Art. 7 says: "Episcopus enixe rogatur ut eorum optatum exaudiat… The Bishop is strenuously asked that he graciously grant their desire." This looks like a pretty serious point.  It is even stronger language than that used for how the parish priest should react to petitions.  The point is that people have a right to the older form and clergy have some sort of obligation to respond.]

        8. The Calendar and order of readings of the Missale Romanum 1962 should be used for the celebration of Mass in the extraordinary form 1962. Attention should be given to the already announced extensions after a period of time of the Calender through the Ecclesia Dei Commission.  [This seems to be saying that while the old calendar is to be followed, there can be some room for adjustments.]

        For the reading of the readings in the vernacular (see Summorum Pontificum Article 6) the Perikopes are to be extracted from the recognised lectionary of the Missal for the Dioceses of the German speaking areas of 1988[!  A post-Conciliar book.  Apparently you look up the readings in the index.] Alternatively, the Schott of 1962 can be used.  [Surely that is what they will choose.]

        [CORRECTED TRANSLATION] 9. The German Diocesan Bishops will make no use of their right to erect personal parishes for the extraordinary form of the roman Rite for the time being. (Summorum Pontificum Article 10)  [THIS IS VERY BAD!]

        10. As the basis the report envisaged after three years over the experiences with the regulations of the Motu Proprio (see Accompanying Letter of Pope Benedict XVI.) the Parish Priest and/or the Rector, if he gives permission [Right… it is the pastor who does this.  Though this includes also rector.  That is interesting.] for the Mass celebration in the extraordinary form in his Parish and/or Church must make a report to the Diocesan Bishop. Parish Priests and Rectors, in whose Parishes and/or Churches Mass celebrations in the extraordinary form take place, must inform the Diocesan Bishops on a continuous basis about any development[I guess that is reasonable.]

    The only real problem here that I see is how they think they will control which parish people go to or participate in.

    I am also disappointed to see that they are not considering "personal parishes".  Let’s hope some of the German bishops won’t stick to this.

    • • • • • •

    27 September 2007

    The “Fourth Secret” drama continues

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 4:43 pm

    In the continuing drama of the "Fourth Secret" of Fatima (that is, the part of th Third Secret which hasn’t been revealed by the Holy See) read this from CWN:

    Italian journalists protest exclusion from Fatima discussion

    Rome, Sep. 27, 2007 (CWNews.com) – Two Italian journalists involved in a dispute over the content of the "third secret of Fatima" have complained that they were roughly treated by security guards when they attempted to attend a lecture in which Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone (bio – news) discussed that topic.  [Card. Bertone is the bete noir for some of the writers on the Third Secret.]

    On September 21, Cardinal Bertone introduced his book, The Last Fatima Visionary: My Meetings with Sister Lucia, at a reception at the Pontifical Urbanianum University. Antonio Socci and Solideo Paolini, authors of competing books on Fatima, say that they were prevented from attending the event or speaking to the cardinal.

    Socci and Paolini report that they asked Father Federico Lombardi, the director of the Vatican press office, whether they could participate in the reception and question Cardinal Bertone about his book.
    When they were told that the cardinal would not take questions, the two journalists tried to confront the Vatican Secretary of State [LOL!] as he entered the room. Security guards hustled them out of the building, while Cardinal Bertone entered by a side door.

    After the confrontation, Socci told reporters that the treatment he had received was "outrageous." In speaking to reporters at the event, Socci and Paolini produced a tape recording in which Archbishop Loris Capovilla, who once served as private secretary to Pope John XXIII, revealed that there were two texts of the "third secret."

    Socci, in his popular book The Fourth Secret of Fatima, argues [convincingly] that the Vatican has not disclosed the entirety of the message given by the Virgin Mary to three children at Fatima. In his book Cardinal Bertone cites Sister Luica, one of the Fatima seers, who counters: "Everything has been published; no secret remains."

    • • • • • •

    Bp. Farrell on the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 2:44 pm

    His Excellency Most Rev. Kevin J. Farrell, Bishop of Dallas has issued a letter to priests of that diocese about the Holy Father’s provisions in Summorum Pontificum.

    My emphases and comments.

    Bishop Farrell’s letter to the priests

    August 24, 2007

    Dear brothers:

    Today, I write to you concerning the most recent publication of Our Holy Father, Pope Benedict XVI regarding the celebration of the Mass in the Extraordinary form, that is, according to the Roman Missal promulgated in 1962 by Pope Blessed John XXIII.

    Here in the Diocese of Dallas the Extraordinary Form is celebrated every Sunday at 9:30 a.m. and at 11:30 a.m. by the Reverend Father Joseph Terra, FSSP at the Chapel of Carmel of St. Joseph and the Infant of Prague. The Extraordinary Form is also celebrated at St. Thomas Aquinas Parish each morning at 6:30 a.m. and on Saturdays at 8:00 a.m. The Ordinary Form of the Mass is celebrated in Latin (Novus Ordo) by the Reverend Paul Weinburger at 11:30 a.m. on Sundays at St. Williams’s Church in Greenville, Texas.

    In accordance with Article V of the Motu Proprio it is the responsibility of the Bishop of the Diocese to oversee the celebration of the liturgy in all of its Forms. [This sounds very much like "The Party Line".]  As most of our priests have no formal liturgical training in the use of the Extraordinary Form I ask that any priest who wishes to celebrate this Form to contact me so that I can assist him [!] in receiving adequate training in this Liturgical Form. [It may be that Father already has adequate help in getting trained up for the old Mass.  Why bother the bishop.] In his letter to the Bishops of the world, which accompanied the Motu Proprio “Summorum Pontificium”, the Holy Father pointed out that the celebration of the Mass in the Extraordinary Form “…presupposes a certain degree of liturgical formation and some knowledge of the Latin language.”

    It is my intention to establish a committee of four priests who have knowledge of the Tridentine Rite to assist me in reviewing all requests from priests [?] and laity to establish public Masses in the Extraordinary Form. [That’s nice, but the Motu Proprio leaves this to the PASTOR.] It will be the responsibility of this committee to assess the Pastoral needs of the people as well as the capacity of our priests and parishes to celebrate the Mass in this Form.  [They can assess all they want, but don’t the provisions of the Motu Proprio leave the decision to the PASTOR?  Where in Summorum Pontificum is there any reference to committees?  Opps.. sorry, there is none.  Trick question.]

    I encourage any priest who seeks to celebrate the Extraordinary Form for the first time, privately or publicly, to seek a review of his abilities to celebrate the Rite in a worthy and noble manner. It would be most unfortunate if, due to a lack of liturgical training or misinterpretation of the rubrics, this Sacred Form was not celebrated with the dignity it requires.  [This hits the nail on the head.  Priests really ought to be smart and prudent and make sure they know their stuff before getting out there in front of people.]

    As I visit the Parishes I am impressed by the dedication of some of our brother priests who, because of the needs of our people, celebrate six or more Masses on a weekend. I have also received requests from Pastors to establish Masses in additional national languages, but I have been reluctant to do so due to a lack of priests. [A very real problem everywhere.] I would hope that, if any priest feels that he could be of assistance in helping some of our more populated parishes, he would be willing to do so. [Something about this strikes me as odd.  The Second Vatican Council says that Latin should be retained and that the vernacular may be used in some circumstances.  So, it seems to me that if there is a choice, Latin (N.O. or V.O.) should get the priority, not the vernacular.  Moreover, couldn’t Latin provide at least some opportunities for greater unity across ethnic and language groups rather than more splintering?] This is a matter I hope to discuss with you at our Convocation.

    Brothers, I thank you for your priestly ministry in service to the needs of our people.

    In Christ,

    Kevin J. Farrell, DD
    Bishop of Dallas

    This is a bit of a mixed bag.  The Bishop makes some good points about availability of priests and training.  At the same time he sort of blows it with the committee business and giving the impression that pastors have to ask for permission to establish public Masses.  Summorum Pontificum is clear about the role of the bishop in these matters and that role is not to give priests permission.  It is to help if requests can’t be met by the parish priest. 

    Also, that whole business about training and contacting him and "just wanting to help", has a slightly suspcious sound to it.

    Okay… I know.. I am too cynical.  It just seems strange there there is so much desire to control priests in this matter when the document clearly frees priests from the constraints placed on them before.  Those constraints were what made Summorum Pontificum necessary, after all.

    His dictis, I want to believe that the offers to help priests with training are positive, though I am extremely suspicious of the "review" process.

    I hope we get positive reports in the future.

    • • • • • •

    Will EWTN be broadcasting Mass with the 1962 Missal?

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 2:21 pm

    Yes… apparently.

    A kind reader sent me a copy on an e-mail received from EWTN’s Gordon Siobley responsding to a question about future broadcasts of the older form of Mass.

    EWTN plans to occasionally air the Extraordinary Form of the Roman Rite, while continuing to regularly air the Ordinary Form, in order “to preserve the riches which have developed in the Church’s faith and prayer, and to give them their proper place” (Pope Benedict XVI, “Letter to Bishops presenting the Motu Proprio”).

    In the Joy of Christ,

    Gordon

    This would be a wonderful service in aid of Pope Benedict’s "Marshall Plan" for the Church.

    • • • • • •

    A bizzaro evening planned

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 1:45 pm

    I have a bizzaro evening planned. 

    Tonight is the 7th season premier of Smallville.

    I was introduced to this series by a Canadian priest in Rome some years ago and have been hooked ever since.


    • • • • • •

    Happy Moon Cake

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULA — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 12:44 pm

    At this time of year the Chinese celebrate their Mid-Autumn Festival.

    With a click of the chop-sticks to Cha Xiu Bao:


    Bright moon, when did you appear?
    Lifting my wine, I ask the dark night sky.
    Tonight in the palace of heaven
    what year is it, I wonder?

    I pray to ride the wind and fly home there,
    Only to hide in the jade and crystal mansion,
    As I could not bear the cold up high.
    So I dance and play in your showers,
    this human world — how can it compare with yours?

    Circling red chambers,
    Leaning the curtained door,
    You shine on the sleepless.
    Surely you bear us no ill will —
    why then must you be so round at times when we are parted!

    People can be sorrow or joy, close together or far apart,
    The moon may be dim or bright, full or null.
    Things are like this since time immemorial.
    I only hope we two may last forever,
    So that we may share the moon’s beauty even though we are a thousand miles apart.

            ~ Shui Diao Ge Tou (水調歌頭) by Su Dongpo (1037 – 1101); gorgeous Chinese calligraphy of the poem can be found here.

    Though it’s one of the most beautiful poems ever written in history, it’s one meant for singing instead of reading, especially ever since the 80’s, thanks to the everlasting adaptation "May We Last Forever" by Teresa Tang]

    [Painting by Liu Danzhian]

    • • • • • •
    Next Page »
    Powered by: Luke 5:1-11 and WordPress