o{]:¬)

Fr. Z is Moderator of the Catholic Online Forum and the ASK FATHER Question Box. The WDTPRS columns appear weekly in The Wanderer. Fr. Z lives in Rome, though he is often in the USA. He is available for retreats and conferences. E-mail


   Fr. Z on WDTPRS

↑ Grab this Headline Animator


Recent Posts
  • Pilgrimage to Rome with Patrick Madrid and Fr. Z
  • QUAERITUR: Sequences.... Should we stand or should we sit? [PARODY SONG ALERT]
  • ALERT! Maniple follow up!
  • Possible new blog style
  • QUAERITUR: keeping maniples on your arm
  • Pentecost at the Pantheon: rose petals falling through the oculus
  • The ultimate "anti-Bable"
  • Benedict XVI's Pentecost Sunday: again a lesson through vestments

  • Recent Comments:

    • Braadwijk: Please tell me this is a joke! I can’t imagine any priest in his right mind who would say Mass in...
    • jacobus: Father, I hope you keep a lot of the side bar stuff; there is a lot of good information there that I enjoy...
    • Roman Sacristan: When I was in Rome last September, I remember waiting at the front gates of the Basilica for it to...
    • Fr. Jay Finelli: I like the second update. It’s very clean and uncluttered.
    • Roman Sacristan: [wipes vomit off of keyboard] [realizes it is a joke] [gets depressed that we will probably see some...

  • Visit the new WDTPRS Store!
    Buy WDTPRS stuff!

    Click below and vote !My site was nominated for Best Religion Blog!


    Calendar


    The Pilgrimage

    Subscribe to ...
    The Wanderer

    Subscribe to ... The Catholic Herald - UK






    This blog is hosted by

    Joyent


    Thanks for the support!


























    WINNER of...

    The 2007 Weblog Awards

















    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Add to Google Reader or Homepage

    Add to My AOL

    Subscribe in Bloglines

    Powered by FeedBurner

    17 March 2008

    Oldie PODCAzT 14: St. Augustine on the Lord’s Passion

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM, PODCAzT — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 11:58 pm

    From last year, 2007, on Holy Monday:

    Today’s Office of Readings has an excerpt of a sermon by St. Augustine of Hippo (+430 – s. Guelf. 3 otherwise called s. 218C) preached in 412 about the Lord’s Passion.  I give you the whole sermon, since it is short.  Also, if you are paying attention, you might hear Augustine refer to the "wonderful bargain" (mirum commercium) and a "mutual give and take" (mutua participatio). 

    The mighty The Lewis & Short Latin Dictionary, says that commercium means “trade, traffic, commerce” but also “intercourse, communication, correspondence, fellowship.”  Every student of Latin knows that epistolarum commercium is an exchange of letters, correspondence back and forth.  Perhaps you will recall the phrase O admirabile commercium - “O wonderous exchange!”, the famous antiphon of Vespers and Lauds of the octave day of Christmas which has been set to glorious sacred music by composers of every age.  And of course, Christmas celebrates the Incarnation which is at the heart of the sermon from Augustine I read in the PODCAzT.

    Commercium has many levels of meaning.  In the Old Testament it could be a reference to the way in which man entered with God into a covenant, a contract and exchange (though between unequal partners).  Our new covenant with God is a commercium, the mysterious participation of the divine Second Person of the Trinity in our humanity, the way that the Son of God became the Son of Man so that we might be made the sons of God.  This is like a mutua participatio, the phrase Augustine uses in the sermon.

    There is also a strong juridical/legal overtone to the word commercium.  Ancient Romans classified people in roughly three different categories, cives (citizens), latini (those closely tied to Rome but without full status), and peregrini (foreign residents)A civis had the rights, among other things, of connubium et commercium, the right to contract legal marriage and to conduct business and commerce (Latini had commercium and the peregrini had neither).  This also included inheritance rights.  Eventually in the dissolution of the Republic into the Empire these were the only truly valuable rights in the civitas (the body-politic, the body of the citizens united in a community including all the integrated cities, etc. – think of St. Augustine’s City of God…De civitate Dei).   

    The words mirum commercium and mutua participatio are loaded with layers. 

     
    icon for podpress  07-04-02 Augustine on the Passion; the Sign of the Cross [28:57m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download


    Here is the part of the Latin text, the part in the breviary:

    Passio Domini et salvatoris nostri Iesu Christi fiducia gloriae est, et doctrina patientiae.
    Quid enim non sibi de Dei gratia promittant corda fidelium, pro quibus Dei Filius unicus et Patri coaeternus parum fuit ut homo ex homine nasceretur, nisi etiam manibus hominum, quos creavit, moreretur ipse ab eis?
    Magnum est quod futurum a Domino promittitur nobis sed multo est maius quod recolimus iam factum esse pro nobis. Ubi erant aut quid erant, quando pro impiis mortuus est Christus? Quis dubitet eum donaturum sanctis vitam suam, qui eisdem donavit adhuc mortem suam? Quid cunctatur humana fragilitas credere futurum esse, ut vivant homines aliquando cum Deo?
    Multo incredibilius iam factum est, quod mortuus est propter homines Deus.
    Quis enim est Christus, nisi illud quod in principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum? Hoc Verbum Dei caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis: Non enim habebat in semetipso unde moreretur pro nobis, nisi mortalem carnem sumpsisset ex nobis. Sic immortalis mori potuit, sic vitam donare mortalibus voluit: particepes sui postea facturus, quorum esset prior particeps factus. Nam nec unde viveremus nos habebamus de nostro, nec unde moreretur ille de suo.
    Mirum proinde nobiscum egit mutua participatione commercium: nostrum erat, unde mortuus est; illius erit, unde vivamus.
    Non solum ergo erubescere non debemus de morte Domini Dei nostri, verum etiam maxime in ea fidere maximeque gloriari: suscipiendo quippe a nobis mortem, quam invenit in nobis, fidelissime spopondit nobis in se vitam daturum, quam habere non possumus ex nobis.
    Nam qui tantum nos dilexit, ut, quod peccato meruimus, sine peccato pro peccatoribus pateretur, quomodo nobis non dabit quod iustitia, qui iustificat? Quomodo non reddet, qui pollicetur in veritate, praemia sanctorum, qui sine iniquitate poenam pertulit iniquorum?
    Confiteamur itaque, fratres, intrepidi, vel etiam profiteamur Christum pro nobis esse crucifixum: non paventes sed gaudentes, non verecundantes sed gloriantes dicamus.
    Vidit hunc apostolus Paulus, et commendavit titulum gloriae. Qui cum haberet multa magna atque divina, quae de Christo commemoraret, non dixit gloriari se in mirabilibus Christi, quia, cum esset apud Patrem Deus, mundum creavit, cum esset etiam quod nos homo, mundo imperavit; sed: Mihi autem, inquit, absit gloriari, nisi in cruce Domini nostri Iesu Christi.

    • • • • • •

    Where some of you are

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 3:10 pm

    Here is a glimpse at the last few minutes.  This is a rough estimation of where many of you are when coming to visit:

    Houston, Texas
    Austin, Texas
    Calgary, Alberta
    Birmingham, Alabama
    Brooklyn, New York
    Villanova, Pennsylvania
    Campolongo Maggiore, Ve…
    Nepean, Ontario
    Summit, New Jersey
    Sheffield
    Minneapolis, Minnesota
    Easley, South Carolina
    Gliwice, Katowice
    Woodbridge, Virginia
    Berkeley, California
    Raleigh, North Carolina
    Alexander, Arkansas
    Naples, Campania
    Saint Paul, Minnesota
    Chigwell, Essex
    London, London, City of
    Rutherford, New Jersey
    Wellesley, Massachusetts
    Schoten, Antwerpen
    Lodz, Lodzkie
    Philadelphia, Pennsylva…
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Dayton, Ohio
    Carlisle, Pennsylvania
    Arlington, Virginia
    Holy See (Vatican City State)
    Seattle, Washington
    Sioux Falls, South Dakota
    San Francisco, California
    Manassas, Virginia
    Capitol Heights, Maryland
    Vancouver, Washington
    Washington, District of…
    Fort Myers, Florida
    Watertown, Massachusetts
    Saint Louis, Missouri
    Balloch, West Dunbarton…
    Santiago, Region Metrop…
    Lexington, Kentucky
    Denham Springs, Louisiana
    San Francisco, California
    Lafayette, Louisiana
    Baltimore, Maryland
    Saint Louis, Missouri
    Toledo, Ohio
    London, London, City of
    Liverpool, New York
    Wichita, Kansas
    Saint Louis, Missouri
    Toledo, Ohio
    London, London, City of
    Liverpool, New York
    Wichita, Kansas
    Dartford, Kent
    Austin, Texas
    Madison, Wisconsin
    Prior Lake, Minnesota
    Naperville, Illinois
    Conception, Missouri
    Tup, Sao Paulo
    Dallas, Texas
    Madison, Wisconsin
    Prior Lake, Minnesota
    Naperville, Illinois
    Newport, Vermont
    San Antonio, Texas
    Arlington Heights, Illi…
    Wausau, Wisconsin
    Annapolis, Maryland
    New Orleans, Louisiana
    Lebanon, Illinois
    Cedar Rapids, Iowa
    San Antonio, Texas
    Reigate, Surrey
    Drums, Pennsylvania
    Concord, New Hampshire
    Woodstock, Georgia
    Lafayette, Louisiana
    Ramat HaSharon, Tel Aviv
    Des Moines, Iowa
    Lake Arrowhead, Califor…
    Palmer, Alaska
    Oakland, California
    Milford, Ohio
    Brussels, Brussels Hoof…
    Clementon, New Jersey
    Oakland, California
    Milford, Ohio
    Brussels, Brussels Hoof…
    Clementon, New Jersey
    Grand Rapids, Michigan
    Dayton, Ohio
    Utrecht
    Richmond, Virginia
    Halifax, Nova Scotia
    Morbach, Rheinland-Pfalz
    Madrid
    Emmitsburg, Maryland
    Prague, Hlavni Mesto Pr…
    New Orleans, Louisiana
    Dublin
    Grand Rapids, Michigan

    • • • • • •

    Another glimpse at my e-mail

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 12:57 pm

    I get lots of mail, hundreds of messages a day.   Some are informative, some inquisitive, some complimentary, some censorious.

    This one rather tickled me. 

    The writer is sad that I liked and wrote positively of H.E. Arthur Serratelli, Bishop of Patterson’s, letter to priests (not to lay people) about the importance of obeying the Church’s rubrics for Holy Mass. 

    Here is the e-mail I got, with my emphases added and comments:

    Father Z,
    It is with great sadness that I read your positive review of Bishop Serratelli’s letter to the diocese of Paterson’s priests regarding liturgy. As a life long committed Christian in the Catholic tradition, [Everyonce in a while I mix things up by saying "Catholic Christians", but this person is doing something very different with his turn of phrase.] it is becoming more apparent to me that our clergy is moving away from Christ’s true message [NB: this guy knows Christ’s "true message".] and moving towards "self-rightious" pomposity. [LOL! But he knows Christ’s "true message"!] When "rules" become more important than substance, then we are no better than Pharisees of the second millennium.   [Apparently anarchy is love.  The writer has not the slightest clue about the role of structure, ritual, consistency as part and parcel of what it is to be Catholic.]
     
    Having lived through the years in which the creaking doors of our Church have been opened through the graces of Vatican II, [He knows Christ’s "true message" too!] I am  now beginning to see those doors begin to close once again. It saddens me .

    • It is my fervent prayer, that this movement back into the dark ages [ROFL!] of Christendom by our Church leaders not continue.
    • It is my great hope, that the leadership of  our Church listen to whisper of the Holy Spirit in their hearts, and stop listening to the loud voice of power, prestige and pompous ego that motivates them today.  [Because anything contrary to this guy’s wishes is obviously not a whisper of the Holy Spirit, nor anything like Christ’s "true message"]
    Above all the grace and the gifts that Christ gives to his beloved is that of overcoming self. St. Francis of Assisi
     
    May the blessings of this Easter season bring you peace, hope and a clearer [!] understanding of truth,

    Great stuff!

    I am guessing that this person was one of those innumerable and unnecessary distributors of Communion who has recently lost his place in the sanctuary because his parish priest has, at the urgency of his bishop, made some changes.

     

    • • • • • •

    Fr. Reginald Foster in Latin on youtube

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 12:35 pm

    There is a youtube video available of Fr. Reginald Foster speaking in Latin to some German media outlet.  There are helpful subtitles in Portugese.

    Fr. Foster is talking about the problem of the loss of Latin, which leads to the closing off of thousands of years of thought.   We have to recover Latin. 

    Biretta tip  o{]:¬)   to I see a light.

    • • • • • •

    Voting for the Catholic Blog Awards - now closed

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 9:34 am

    Voting ended today for the 2008 Catholic Blog Awards. 

    WDTPRS is in most of the categories and, when there was a midweek progress report, we were doing fairly well.

    These awards are little benchmarks, and as such have their purpose.  Among other things, they raise consciousness about the effectiveness of Catholic blogs.  Over the last couple years I think the Catholic blogosphere has made an impact in some rather important ways.  This is in large part to the way you readers and commenters use them. 

    Many thanks to those of you who voted, for whichever Catholic blog you chose in each category!

    • • • • • •

    Rabble rousers!

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 8:53 am

    South Ashford Priest has some photos of a demonstration outside their cathedral as the priests entered for the Chrism Mass.

    Just look at these rabble rousers!


     

    Nice gesture! 

    His Hermeneuticalness, the great Fr. Tim Finigan – perhaps the future Archbishop of Westminster (have the odds changed, btw?) has a bit more on this

     

    • • • • • •

    Sandro Magister rightly blasts the TV coverage of Papal ceremonies

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 8:26 am

    The gentlemanly Sandro Magister has some pointed observations about the television coverage of papal Masses.

    I must say I share his well-expressed views.

    Let’s have a look at what he writes on his worthy blog, Settimo cielo, in my translation and with my emphases and comments.

    Papal Masses on TV: An Entirely Failed Production

    With the procession and the Mass for Palm Sunday, on 16 March in St. Peter’s Square, Benedict XVI initiated the rites of Holy Week.

    As we have now seen for some months already, at the center of the altar there were a Cross and a 7th lighted candle.  The Pope celebrated the Eucharist turned to the Cross.  And the faithful, whether they knew it or not, did the same, thus reviving an element of tradition that in the last few decades had been lost.

    As always, the celebration was broadcast live on television.  The direction of the program, however, showed its usual lack of sensibility for they exigencies of the rite.

    Elementary logic would have it that a television broadcast of a papal celebration would make visible to the public the actual celebration.  Even on the large screens in St. Peter’s Square should serve for this purpose: to show to the faithful in a closer format what was going on at the distant altar.

    Instead, no.  There was an out of proportion quantity of closeups of the faithful.  As if someone who wanted to assist at a televised Mass needed that.  [Hear hear!  I was watching the direct internet feed from CTV, so I didn’t have the incessant chatter from the guys at RAI or CTV, but the video portion inflicted constant closeups of people in the square, sometimes praying or watching intently, often eyes wandering around or aping at the camera when they saw themselves on the screen.  You expect that sort of thing at ball games on the jumbotron, but… at Mass?]

    Other television programs rightly do not suffer from a similar violation.  For example, someone who watches an opera on TV sees and hears the opera, not the faces of the spectators present in the theater, nor even less the chatter of some announcer superimposed on the music.  In the same way, the viewer of a live brodcast of a papal Mass would expect to see and hear, simply, the Mass, and not something else.  [About the audio.   This is a problem with the English language on EWTN too.  I believe they get their audio from the English section of Vatican Radio.  However, radio people tend to talk more, so they don’t have dead air.  That is a problem for those who have video and not just audio.  Also, the "color commentator" got things wrong.  Pretty distracting.  However, when I did review a bit of the Mass coverage from EWTN, I noted to myself at the time that they were in fact talking less than I remember in the past.  So, maybe they are trying to make adjustments.  I don’t know.  I will try to find out.]

    What is instead dished up to him is a bunch of images which for the most part are out of place.  Let’s not even talk about the audio.  [I didn’t hear the audio from CTV or RAI this time, but I have in the past.  They just can’t shut up.  Perhaps they are using the feed from Vatican Radio?]

    To make the disaster worse they also add dreadful mistakes of framing the shot. In the Mass for Palm Sunday, at the beginning of his sermon, the Pope was not in the picture, as would be a logical: the sermon began which the picture was wandering around here and there.  And during the singing of the Passion by three deacons, every time one of them was framed in the picture, there was almost always some mistake, that is, he wasn’t the one singing.  It’s as if, at a concert, they showed the tenor when the soprano was singing, or they show the flautists during a violin solo.

    The TV coverage of papal Masses is handled by the Centro Televisivo Vaticano [CTV] in collaboration with the RAI.  The details are well explained in an article by Fr. Virgilio Fantuzzi in La Civiltà Cattolica of 19 July 2003 reproduced at www.chiesa: “Liturgia papale, radio e televisione"

    Five years after the article, the woes which were denounced persist intact.  If not worse yet.


    • • • • • •

    Some trivia… this day in ancient Roman history

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 7:45 am

    I always check each day the fun site rogue classicism for interesting trivia.

    Let’s look at today’s entry there.

    This Day in Ancient History

    ante diem xvi kalendas apriles

    Festival of Mars continues (day 17)

    Liberalia—a festival of general merriment and wine drinking in honour of Liber Pater (another name for Bacchus)

    Agonalia—the rex sacrificulus would offer a ram to various deities

    45 B.C.—Julius Caesar defeats Pompey’s sons and Labienus at Munda

    136 A.D.—the future emperor Marcus Aurelius dons the toga virilis

    180 A.D.—death of Marcus Aurelius at Bononia

    461 A.D.—death of Saint Patrick (traditional)

     

    Do you like the movie Gladiator?  There are some great moments in that film.  While the film makers did some absolutely absurd things to Marcus Aurelius… after all, the idea that Marcus Aurelius would have wanted to restore the Republic is pure fantasy … Gladiator does include the day Marcus Aurelius died at Bononia.

    Okay… enough of that.

    • • • • • •

    Happy Feast Day!

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 7:28 am

    Happy Feast Day!

    Yes, folks, once again the calendar has brought us around to the feast of St. John Sarkander, priest and martyr (+1620).

    Here is the enrty in the Martyrologium Romanum.

    7.  Olomucii in Moravia, sancti Ioannis Sarkander, presbyteri et martyris, qui parochus Holesoviensis, cum arcana confessionum tradere renuisset, rotae supplicio datus est et adhuc spirans in carcerem deiectus post mensem obiit.

    It is also the feast of St. Gabriel Lalemant, S.J., martyred by Hurons in Canada (+1649).  And don’t forget St. Gertrude of Brabant, abbess (+659).

     

    Hmm…. forgetting anyone?

    Oh yes… and a very happy Name Day to any of you named Patrice or Patrick!

    • • • • • •

    Send in your photos of veiled images in your churches!

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM, My View — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 7:20 am

    If you send me good and useable photos of your churches and chapels with the images and statues veiled (as they may be as of 1st Passion Sunday (1962MR) or 5th Sunday of Lent (2002MR), I will try to post them.

    I don’t promise to post eveything sent to me, but I will do my best!

    I’ll start things off.

    This is the chapel of the Sabine Farm.


    • • • • • •

    Facebook…. what is this all about?

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 7:03 am

    I am often asked if I am on Facebook.  Also, I know that some people I highly respect are using Facebook in interesting ways.

    Perhaps we could have a little discussion of Facebook here.

    What is it all about?

    How do you use it?

    • • • • • •

    Palm Sunday TLM at Assumption Grotto in Detroit

    CATEGORY: SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 6:56 am

    Over at Te Deum laudamus there are some fine photos of the Palm Sunday Mass at Assumption Grotto Church in Detroit where the great Fr. Perrone is pastor.  They had Holy Mass with the older, extraordinary use.

    Here are a couple of the photos I picked up from Te Deum laudamusYou can see more over there.

    Note the red antependium.  The liturgy starts with red but changes to violet for Mass.

     

     

    • • • • • •
    Powered by: Luke 5:1-11 and WordPress