… you have to do something to deserve the Noble Prize for Peace.
Why didn’t we see this coming?
They must have been impressed with his performance in Copenhagen. They must have loved his speech at the UN. They must have loved how he stuck it to Poland and how he is throwing Israel under the bus.
Didn’t Arizona State decline to give President Obama because he hadn’t done anything yet?
So they give him the Noble Peace Prize so that he might do something in the future?
- POTUS called for the abandonment of nuclear weapons…. like that’s going to happen.
- He expanded American diplomacy…. read "we’re sorry were us", as we bow to a Saudi king.
- He replaced Pres. Bush’s unilateralism with multilateralism. Though Pres. Bush had, what, 43 nations involved in Iraq and Pres. Obama can get … who?… to help in Afghanistan?
Old Scandinavian hippies want to encourage Pres. Obama… so they give him an atta boy. Much like L’Osservatore Romano did, right?
Both really important entities, too.
Al Gore can give him some tips about how to handle his knew prestige.
I bet those aging Scandinavian hippies are thinking… "Now let’s see if he’ll bomb Iran or send more troops to Afghanistan."
The Academy Awards now impress me more.
Thus endeth the rant.