Today, according to my Roman Curia wall calendar, is the feast of St. Daniel, prophet, and of Sts. Ananias, Azarias, and Misael, the three boys in the fiery furnace.
Some words of wisdom…
The more vigorously the primacy was displayed, the more the question came up about the extent and and limits of [papal] authority, which of course, as such, had never been considered. After the Second Vatican Council, the impression arose that the pope really could do anything in liturgical matters, especially if he were acting on the mandate of an ecumenical council. Eventually, the idea of the givenness of the liturgy, the fact that one cannot do with it what one will, faded from the public consciousness of the West. In fact, the First Vatican Council had in no way defined the pope as an absolute monarch. On the contrary, it presented him as the guarantor of obedience to the revealed Word. The pope's authority is bound to the Tradition of faith. … The authority of the pope is not unlimited; it is at the service of Sacred Tradition.
Joseph Ratzinger
US HERE - UK HERE
in The Spirit of the Liturgy
Outstanding. Informative. Moving. - Fr. Z
CLICK and say your Daily Offering!
"We as Catholics have not properly combated (the culture) because we have not been taught our Catholic Faith, especially in the depth needed to address these grave evils of our time. This is a failure of catechesis both of children and young people that has been going on for fifty years. It is being addressed, but it needs much more radical attention... What has also contributed greatly to the situation is an exaltation of the virtue of tolerance which is falsely seen as the virtue which governs all other virtues. In other words, we should tolerate other people in their immoral actions to the extent that we seem also to accept the moral wrong. Tolerance is a virtue, but it is certainly not the principal virtue; the principal virtue is charity... Charity means speaking the truth. I have encountered it (not speaking the truth) many times myself as a priest and bishop. It is something we simply need to address. There is far too much silence — people do not want to talk about it because the topic is not 'politically correct.' But we cannot be silent any longer."Raymond Card. Burke
Coat of Arms by D BurkartMy CHALLENGE COINS for my 25th Anniversary of Ordination (26 May 1991) arrived.
I'll make a number of them available for exchange and in gratitude to special benefactors.
I listen to your voicemails: I don’t call back, but I listen.
You have three options:
WDTPRS
020 8133 4535
651-447-6265Help Monks in Wyoming (coffee) and Norcia (beer)!
出る杭は打たれ!-
Without you, there is no blog.
There is a subscription form at the bottom of this page! -
Aedificantium enim unusquisque gladio erat accinctus.
- Nehemiah 4:18
"Where priest and people together face the same way, what we have is a cosmic orientation and also in interpretation of the Eucharist in terms of resurrection and trinitarian theology. Hence it is also an interpretation in terms of parousia, a theology of hope, in which every Mass is an approach to the return of Christ."Joseph Ratzinger - The Feast of Faith
"In those situations where homosexual unions have been legally recognized or have been given the legal status and rights belonging to marriage, clear and emphatic opposition is a duty. ... If all Catholics are obliged to oppose the legal recognition of homosexual unions, Catholic politicians are obliged to do so in a particular way, in keeping with their responsibility as politicians." CDF 2003
One of the most dangerous errors is that civilization is automatically bound to increase and spread. The lesson of history is the opposite; civilization is a rarity, attained with difficulty and easily lost. The normal state of humanity is barbarism, just as the normal surface of the planet is salt water. Land looms large in our imagination and civilization in history books, only because sea and savagery are to us less interesting. — C. S. Lewis For contemplation…
"One of the few things in life you can be absolutely sure about is that, if Management tells you it doesn't like your Tone, you are getting something right."
"Latin is a precise, essential language. It will be abandoned, not because it is unsuitable for the new requirements of progress, but because the new men will not be suitable for it. When the age of demagogues and charlatans begins, a language like Latin will no longer be useful, and any oaf will be able to give a speech in public and talk in such a way that he will not be kicked off the stage. The secret to this will consist in the fact that, by making use of words that are general, elusive, and sound good, he will be able to speak for an hour without saying anything. With Latin, this is impossible."- - Giovanni Guareschi
Support them with prayer and fasting.
Click for Car Magnets
Help the Sisters. They have a building project. Get great soap (gifts, etc.) while helping REAL nuns!
Great data SIM and device
for travel.Some OBLIGATORY reading…
God or Nothing: A Conversation on Faith by Robert Card. Sarah
Buy it. Get one for your parish priests.
UK HERE
Leave Voice Mail for Fr. Z
Nota bene: I do not answer these numbers or this Skype address. You won't get me "live". I check for messages regularly.
WDTPRS020 8133 4535651-447-6265Yes, Fr. Z is taking ads…
For example...
-
A great hymnal…
Mystic Monk Coffee also has TEA!
Because it matters what children read…
I carry one of these super-strong rosaries in my spare mag pouch! The Swiss Guards have them too!
Because you don’t know when you are going to need to move fast or get along without the supermarket…
My wish lists
Main Wishlist
Kindle Wishlist
Audio Wishlist
Ham Radio List
NEW
PLEASE RESPOND. Pretty pleeeease?
Loading ...WDTPRS POLL
Loading ...Fr. Z’s stuff is everywhere
Help support Fr. Z’s Gospel of Life work at no cost to you. Do you need a Real Estate Agent? Calling these people is the FIRST thing you should do!
They find you a pro-life agent in your area who commits to giving a portion of the fee to a pro-life group!
Reading and gift ideas!
This is very confusing, my sources tell me Daniel’s feast is on July 21.
One of my favourite canticles in the Office is the Song of the Three Boys in the Furnace… Its rhythm and poetry of all Creation being naturally inclined to ‘bless the Lord’ is simply a beautiful way to start a Sunday morning… (one Sunday every four weeks in the new Office…)
Orate pro nobis!
In the Martyrologium Romanum ed. princeps (1584), early version of the Extraordinary Form calendar, the index indicates:
Ananias, Azarias, & Misael in Babylonioa. 16. Dec.
Daniel propheta in Babylonia. 21. Iul.
But none of them appear in the Martyrologium Romanum ed. altera (2004) for the Ordinary Form calendar.
Since 16. Dec was a Sunday, I can see that Ananias, Azarias, and Misael might have been transferred to the following Monday. But I do not understand Daniel’s presence.
There is a wonderful oratorio about this event. Composed by Johann Adolf Hasse (1699-1783), his “Gesang der drei Juenglinge im Feuerofen (Il cantico de’ tre fanciulli)” is a lovely work written for soli, chorus and orchestra. Thought to have been written sometime before 1731, the Cantico is one of Hasses earliest works and is the first he composed for mixed choir. The opus of sacred music of Hasse has been available on recordings for some time, but this Cantico is indeed a rarity. The only CD recording of which I am aware is on the Koch Schwann label (3-6587-2) and I believe that it might still be available for purchase. If you have not before heard of Hasse or his sacred music of the late Baroque period, might I strongly recommend his Cantico and any of the others available on various CD labels. You can also hear some short extracts from his works on YouTube.
@Andreas: Hasse’s music is indeed lovely. I’ve heard one of his arias performed in church by an organist friend, who happens to be his descendant in the direct line!
Frohe Weihnachten in Tirol!
Dr Guiness – actually every fortnight on Sundays [Sundays of weeks 1 and 3] plus Lauds on all solemnities, feasts and some memorias.
fvhale – probably because modern biblical scholarship is confident that all four are merely characters in Mesopotamian legends used by an unknown author in the 2nd century when he wrote the Book of ‘Daniel.’ Even authors such as Kenneth Baker SJ in his work ‘Inside the Bible,’ published by Ignatius Press subscribes to this view. I am not a biblical scholar, just a humble canon lawyer so am not commenting on the truth, likelihood or falsehood of such theories, just saying that is quite possibly why the new Martyrology is silent on this matter, as it is wrt many Old Testament characters who found themselves commemorated in the older Martyrology.
Father K,
Do you have a page number for the Baker opinion? It is a google book, but I cannot find the text saying that.
Father K, robtbrown: I just reviewed my copy of Inside the Bible by Fr. Ken Baker, SJ. The chapter on Daniel makes no mention of “all four are merely characters in Mesopotamian legends.”
The Orthodox celebrate the feast of St. Daniel and the three young men on Dec. 17. We have St. Daniel on July 21 but I understand some dioceses celebrate him on different days which may be what we have here on Fr. Z’s calendar.
I think there are more than a few errors on the curial calendar.
There is an interesting linguistic connection that might explain the presence of the Three Holy Children at this time of the year. Ananias is of course the Greek form (adopted in Latin Scriptures) of the Hebrew name Chananya (emphasis on the second syllable.) Chananya is a fairly common Hebrew name of the Second Temple period, continuing on through Talmudic times – several rabbis of the Talmud are named Chananya. “Chanan” means grace, and the “Yah” part of the name is an abbreviated form of the name of God. Thus the name means something like God’s grace, or perhaps by the grace of God. The even more common name Yochanan is obviously the same root, and it too has a shortened form of God’s name appended to it, in the prefix rather than the suffix (the yod and the vav part of God’s name, rather than the yod and the heh.) The names are identical in meaning.
Why Yochanan ended up in Greek as Ioannes rather than a more accurate transliteration is not hard to figure out. Yochanan was among the most common of all Hebrew names by the time Greeks and Jews were coming into regular contact in the area, in the post-Alexandrine era, and it’s easy to see how Jews might choose to “Greekify” their name with the common Greek “es” ending; it’s a pattern of linguistic accommodation that one sees from the Second Temple right through Jewish immigrants to the Lower East Side – a Moshe who becomes Morry, a Shimon who becomes Seymour, a Yitzhak who becomes Irving, etc. So the end result is that thousands of years later we look at “John” and “Ananias” and see no connection there at all, when of course it is the same name. Perhaps the Church in Her wisdom (or should that be in this week of Sapientiatide Her Wisdom?) places this feast here, in the final week of Advent, as an echo of the Baptist, whose rough voice cries throughout the season, calling us to repentance and to the continual glorification of both His comings. Of course that might just be fancy on my part; I’m pretty sure no one devising the liturgical calendar when this memorial was placed on it had much of a nodding acquaintance with Hebrew, or its nuances. But sometimes the wisdom of the calendar is deeper than the human hands tinkering with it, and breathes with the Spirit of Wisdom. So I will let my rather Talmudic little parsing stand, I think.
The reference in Fr Baker’s book is page 171. He does not say the author is making use of Mesopotomian legends but he does say that the Book of Daniel is the work of an unknown author of the 2nd century BC. Thus he implies that the material he is working with comes from traditions handed down from the Babylonian exile. More radical scholars will call the legends without historical value, whereas more moderate commentators will give weight to the tradition that these stories [legends in the broader sense] depict actual historical persons and events. Sorry if I was confusing – I was making the distinction in my mind while writing, maybe that was not transferred to the text. However, there are sufficient numbers working for the CDW to ensure that the Martyrology reflects a more radical view.
If I may quote a bit over a paragraph from Introduction to the Bible by Fr. John Laux, copyright 1932 by Benziger Brothers, and 1990 by TAN Books, pp. 184-185:
—
Of all the books of the Bible, none presents so many difficult problems as the Prophecy of Daniel.
The Book of Daniel is arranged in no historical order.
It has come down to us with different parts written in different languages–some in Hebrew, some in Chaldaic [Aramaic], and some in Greek.
There are unusual changes of construction throughout, the first person frequently alternating with the third.
There are repetitions which it is hard to explain, and additions appended to the book which appear to have no connection with the main body of the content.
Certain historical details seem to be at variance with the Books of Kings and with discoveries made in Babylonia in recent times. Baltasar is constantly referred to as king and is called the son of Nebuchodonosor, wheras the Baltasar of history was the son of Nabonidus and never king. A certain Darius the Mede is made to reign in Babylon before Cyrus the Great, whereas the only Darius that history knows reigned over the Persian Empire as the second successor of Cyrus,…
These are the chief difficulties that confront the reader of Daniel. Some of them can be satisfactorily solved; others will perhaps never be solved. One thing appears certain: the Book of Daniel as we have it now was not written by Daniel the Prophet, but is a compilation of a much later date, probably about the year 300 B.C. … the Book of Daniel may have ben composed by some inspired writer living long after the Daniel of history. ‘It has never been a point of Catholic doctrine,’ says Father Hugh Pope [1869-1946, English Dominican], the eminent Scripture scholar, ‘that the Book of Daniel was actually written by him, nor even that it was written in the sixth century B.C….'”
I always learned that the three young men’s names were Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego. Would those be the Chaldean names?
Luvadoxi said, “Would those be the Chaldean names?”
Yes.