WDTPRS 14th Ordinary Sunday – raising from the dust a fallen world

Shall we drill into the Collect for Mass?

Our Collect offers us an image material creation like an enervated body, wounded and weakened by sin, lying in the dust whence it came.

COLLECT – (2002MR):
Deus, qui Filii tui humilitate iacentem mundum erexisti,
elibus tuis sanctam concede laetitiam,
ut, quos 
eripuisti a servitute peccati,
gaudiis facias p
erfrui sempiternis.

Centuries before St. Pius V’s 1570MR and subsequent 1962MR of Bl. John XXIII the ancient Gelasian Sacramentary indicates an earlier version existed for the Sunday after the Octave of Easter: Deus, qui in filii tui humilitatem iacentem mundum erexisti, laetitiam concede elibus tuis>, ut quos perpetuae eripuisti casibus, gaudiis facias sempiternis perfruere.   NB: perfruere here is an infinitive. Even though perfruor is deponent (infinitive: perfrui) active forms do appear once in a while in Latin.  Because the words in < > were illegible or missing in the manuscripts, they were supplied by the editor of the Gelasian, Leo Cunibert Mohlberg.  This is all super picky, I know, but it is important for what the prayer really says in its newer version in the Novus Ordo.  More about that later.

In the meantime, let’s think laterally.  The last phrase of the Collect reminds me of other well known Latin prayers.  For example, the Salve Regina traditionally concluded with the Collect from the votive Mass for the Blessed Virgin celebrated on Saturdays: “Grant us your servants, we pray you O Lord God, to enjoy perpetual health of mind and body, and, by the glorious intercession of blessed Mary ever-Virgin, may we be delivered from present sorrow and enjoy everlasting happiness (aeterna perfrui laetitia).”  The themes here are similar to today’s Collect in that there is a shift from sorrow to joy through God’s providential gift.

Moreover, when the priest vests for Mass he says, or ought to say, special prayers as he put on each vestment.  When putting on the alb, the symbol of our baptism, he would pray: “Make me white, O Lord, and cleanse my heart, so that having been made white in the Blood of the Lamb, I may enjoy everlasting joys (gaudiis perfruar sempiternis).”  There is similar vocabulary in the other vesting prayers, which could once be found posted in every sacristy in the world.

My hook for these last comments was the verb perfruor, one of a few famous deponent verbs used normally and classically with the ablative case: utor, abutor, fruor, fungor, potior and vescor. In different periods of Latin these verbs could have active forms, as we saw above, and could also take objects in the accusative or even genitive.  In modern liturgical usage they are deponents and always get ablative “objects”.  Actually, these aren’t really objects, but rather a kind of instrument: e.g., vescor, “I feed myself from…”; fruor, “I get fruit/benefit from…”; etc.   A good grammar explains how these verbs work.  Latin Students: If you want a really good Latin grammar get the superb volume we lovingly call Gildersleeve & Lodge, or fully, Gildersleeve’s Latin Grammar (enlarged with the additional help of Gonzalez Lodge).   Basil L. Gildersleeve said, and this is true in the world of WDTPRS,

“No study of literature can yield its highest result without the close study of language, and consequently the close study of grammar.”

Two words in the prayer, gaudium and laetitia, can be rendered into English with the same word “joy” and variations.  We don’t want to give undue emphasis to the different sorts of “joy” possible with different words.  However, the chock-full L&S states that gaudium refers mostly to a joy which is interior whereas laetitia suggests a joy having outward expression.   To confuse matters, L&S also says that gaudium in the plural (as it is in our prayer) can also be “the outward expressions of joy”.  In a supplement to the L&S, A. Souter’s Glossary of Later Latin to 600 A.D. we discover that gaudium is “everlasting blessedness” while laetitia is simply “prosperity”.  So, in Souter we still uncover something of the spiritual versus material distinction explained by L&S.  A. Blaise in Le Vocabulaire Latin des principaux thèmes liturgiqueimply that laetitia and gaudium are pretty much the same thing.  The dictates of ancient rhetoric (and this prayer is quite ancient) required a copia verborum, a richness of vocabulary, so as to avoid boring repetition.  Nevertheless, each word gives us “joy”, but with shades of meaning.  Perhaps a solution is found in L&S’s saying that “like our joy, for an object which produces joy, a cause or occasion of joy”.  For us who, raised up from our sins, die in God’s friendship, the object which will produce joy is (in this world) the state of grace and a clean conscience and (in the next life) the Beatific Vision and Communion of Saints.

L&S indicates that erigo means “to raise up, set up, erect” and also analogously “to arouse, excite” and “cheer up, encourage.” The verb iace(in the L&S find this under jaceo) has many meanings, such as “to lie” as in “lie sick or dead, fallen” and also “to be cast down, fixed on the ground” and “to be overcome, despised, idle, neglected, unemployed.”  Humilitas is “lowness” In Blaise humilitas has a more theological meaning in the “abasement” of the God Incarnate who took the form of a “slave” (cf. Philippians 2:7).  Blaise refers to this Collect in the entry for humilitas.

As mentioned, above, our Collect offers us an image material creation like an enervated body, wounded and weakened by sin, lying in the dust forth from which it came.

In the sin of our first parents all creation was wounded and, as we see everyday, the harmony that there ought to have been between the rest of material creation and man its steward has been damaged.  It is almost as if creation, including us, is bound and captive by an enemy who has beaten him down to the ground and enslaved him.  God then comes as liberator.  (True Liberation Theology!) He rouses us from being prone upon the ground.  He grasps us, pulling us upward out of sin and death.  He aims us again toward the joys possible in this world first and then definitively in the next, if only we can get back to our feet.  Our Savior, the Son, came in humility to rescue us in our wretchedness.   We have seen before in our prayers the pattern of descent and ascent, of exit and return.   Before the Resurrection there is the Passion.  Before exaltation there is humiliation.  The descent, exit, Passion and humiliation bring an even more exalted joy which will embrace the entirety of man in both soul and body, the interior and the outward human person.

O God, who raised up a fallen world by the abasement of Your Son,
grant holy joy to Your faithful,
so that You may caus
e those whom You snatched from the servitude of sin
enjoy delights unending.

As mentioned above, today’s Collect is nearly the same as one found in the 1962MR.  However, whereas the 1970/2002MR version says quos eripuisti a servitute peccati the 1962MR says quos perpetuae mortis eripuisti casibus, that is, “whom you have snatched from the perils of everlasting death”.

A polemical but highly interesting little booklet called The Problems with the Prayers of the Modern Mass (TAN 1991) by Anthony Cekada compares the 1962MR version of this Collect with the 1970MR version.  Cekada opines that the redactors of the Novus Ordo intentionally eliminated from the Latin the concept of damnation and substituted the “less threatening idea of deliverance from the ‘slavery of sin’” (p. 14).   Cekada is probably right, though I respectfully respond that “servitude of sin” is fairly terrifying for someone who is spiritually aware.

Perhaps understanding “raised up a fallen world” in the sense of liberation prompted the change from “eternal death” to “servitude of sin”.  Christ’s “abasement” and later “raising” freed us from future death and present enslavement in sin.  In His resurrection we were raised up to the joy (present and future) of being God’s faithful ones.   Think what you want about the change in emphasis in the Latin text, the newer Collect is a fine prayer and we have the right to hear what it really means.

What was inflicted on the People of God for years?

through th
e obedience of Jesus,
your s
ervant and your Son,
you rais
ed a fallen world.
ee us from sin
and bring us th
e joy that lasts forever.

What do we hear now?

O God, who in the abasement of your Son
have raised up a fallen world,
fill your faithful with holy joy,
for on those you have rescued from slavery to sin
you bestow eternal gladness

You decide.

FacebookEmailPinterestGoogle GmailShare/Bookmark

About Fr. John Zuhlsdorf

Fr. Z is the guy who runs this blog. o{]:¬)
This entry was posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, WDTPRS and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to WDTPRS 14th Ordinary Sunday – raising from the dust a fallen world

  1. Deo volente says:

    Fourteenth Sunday? Here is the link to today’s USCCB readings online. It is the Thirteenth Sunday according to this site.

    Pax tecum!

  2. Whereas one occasionally sees recommendations to pray the propers of Sunday Mass for continued spiritual benefit during the succeeding week—and indeed on ferial days during Ordinary Time the concluding prayer of the Office of Readings is the collect of the preceding Sunday—might it not be even more edifying to prepare for each Sunday Mass by studying its propers in advance during the preceding week? Father Z could encourage this practice by posting each Sunday his reflections on the collect of the next Sunday.

  3. Priam1184 says:

    Ok Father you convinced me, I ordered Gildersleeve’s (by following the link from your blog) and will pick up the Lewis & Short dictionary when I save up the two hundred thirteen dollars and forty-six cents.

  4. jaykay says:

    Much as I support the new translations, I think the team slightly reverted to “old ICEL” mode here in that they ignored the subjunctive in the final clause and went back to telling God what He does instead of praying Him to grant us the benefits, which the “ut” + subjunctive clearly imports. I would have been slapped for doing that 40 or so years ago :( And they could have inserted “whom” as well, to improve clarity and rhythm. But these are small points and, overall, it’s still so much better than the old.

  5. tgarcia2 says:

    Also ties into the second reading better than the original mangled translation!

  6. Vecchio di Londra says:

    Priam – you can buy the excellent and handy one-volume CT Lewis ‘Elementary Latin Dictionary’ containing almost everything any student of the liturgy would ever need, for a few dollars – a repro of the 1923 edition is available new on US Amazon for $45 and good secondhand copies from Abebooks for less than $20 – E-editions less than $10

    The Oxford Glossary of Later Latin can be useful for Christian terms.
    But it’s really not essential.

    Good luck with Gildersleeve and Lodge, ruthlessly comprehensive but rather daunting. I’d suggest starting with the Cambridge Latin Grammar, or a really effective and good-humoured primer by Peter Jones called ‘Learn Latin’.

    And as they say – all imho and dyor.