Of comments on religious persecution and of John Allen’s new book.

The Fishwrap‘s solitary boast, the nearly ubiquitous John L. Allen, Jr., has good text on (inter alia) the persecution of Christians – a topic on which he is über-credible.  He includes comments made by Card. Turkson.  This deserves your attention:

Next came the Council for Justice and Peace, which held its own press conference Thursday to unveil an Oct. 2-4 conference on the 50th anniversary of Pacem in Terris, the 1963 peace encyclical of Pope John XXIII.

The press conference provided a welcome relief from the usual insider baseball of Catholic discussion, affording top officials of the council, including Cardinal Peter Turkson of Ghana and Bishop Mario Toso of Italy, to address a staggering cross-section of external questions, including reform of the United Nations, water as a source of global conflict, and the best way to engage Islam.

[...]

Describing the upcoming conference, Turkson said one of the issues it will consider is what he called the “new frontiers of peace,” including “the persecution of Christians in the world.” In light of recent anti-Christian violence in both Pakistan and Kenya, I asked if there was any particular project or initiative regarding anti-Christian persecution Turkson’s council was considering.

In response, he said he hopes the Vatican’s representatives to international bodies such as the United Nations and the European Parliament can raise the profile of the issue. He also talked about the difficulties of engaging Muslims on the issue, saying that because Muslims “believe they have the final revelation,” they often “don’t enter into dialogue believing they have anything to learn.

For instance, Turkson said when some Muslim nations wanted to press the United Nations to adopt a resolution condemning religious defamation, Christian leaders asked them to also support a resolution against religious persecution, but with limited success.

In light of the ferment, this may be a good moment to remind readers that I have a new book that comes out Tuesday, The Global War on Christians: Dispatches from the Front Lines of Anti-Christian Persecution. Information can be found here.

John Allen is to be thanked for his coverage of the persecution of Christians.

Allen has been on top of this issue for a long time and he is passionate about it – as we all should be.  I predict his book will be informative.  It is available at a pre-release price at the time of this writing.

His article, at Fishwrap, also includes interesting comments on the reform of the Roman Curia and the possible integration of several smaller curial dicasteries.  I think that the Curia will not be slimmed down under Francis.  It is going to get fatter.  But that’s another pot of soup.

FacebookEmailPinterestGoogle GmailShare/Bookmark

About Fr. John Zuhlsdorf

Fr. Z is the guy who runs this blog. o{]:¬)
This entry was posted in The Drill, The Last Acceptable Prejudice, The Religion of Peace and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Of comments on religious persecution and of John Allen’s new book.

  1. chantgirl says:

    Stories of Christians and Jews being persecuted at the hands of Muslims need to somehow breakthrough the media blackout.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2434278/Kenya-mall-attack-torture-claims-emerge-soldiers-Eyes-gouged-bodies-hooks-fingers-removed.html

    God have mercy!

  2. Phil_NL says:

    the best way to engage Islam

    Missionaries when available, entry-restrictions when possible, B-2′s when the first two fail.

  3. cajuncath says:

    “Muslims believe they have the final revelation.” Does this mean we’re NOT supposed to believe we have the final revelation?

  4. Phil_NL says:

    cajuncath,

    The real problem isn’t who has the final revelation. The real problem is that you can’t even debate the question with islam, as islam believes allah to be above reason (or just about any other characteristic for that matter).
    For a muslim, it makes perfect sense to, at the same time, 1) hold that allah makes the unbelievers believe that they have the final revelation, and 2) hold that islam in fact has the final revelation, and 3) unbelievers are still bound to embrace islam. The fact that 3 (aided by 2) directly contradicts 1 is of no concern. That’s – in a muslim view – just the way allah made the world. No need for debate, that would just be questioning allah’s ‘wisdom’, which is above logic anyway.

    It doesn’t even matter that such a state of affairs would mean that their view of a deity is not one of mercy or compassion, or goodness, but one who deliberately designs the world to be full of souls who will have to fail at reaching any kind of salvation. (by divine design, the escape route to the problem above consisting of the assumption that allah would in fact command unbelievers into error, promoting faith and unbelief at the same time, would not be objectionable either)

    In a way, islam got off easily in the Regensburg adress.

  5. Kerry says:

    It seems more and more the “best way to engage islam” is with fixed bayonets.

  6. TC says:

    If I may recommend another journalist who has been paying attention to the persecution of Christians, see Damian Thompson of the Telegraph:
    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/author/damianthompson/

    You can ignore his “inside baseball” posts about UK politics but he also covers the CofE, the English Catholic Bishops, the Ordinariate & like topics.

  7. Pingback: Of comments on religious persecution and of John Allen's new book … | ChristianBookBarn.com