Tag Archives: can. 1387

Card. Coccopalmerio’s booklet: The Response™? Apparently not.

Yesterday, I posted HERE about the release of the booklet by Card. Coccopalmerio, Prefect of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts. It was ballyhooed as The Response™ to the Five Dubia of the Four “intransigent” Cardinals, who are dissenters because they … Continue reading

Please share!
Posted in The Drill | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 24 Comments

Canonist Ed Peters explains situation to Crux priest. Important info for priests, confessors.

The other day at Crux there was a piece by Fr. Paul Keller about a theoretical (Deo gratias) case study in which the writer – basing himself on the objectively unclear notions of Amoris laetitia Chapter 8 – figures out how to … Continue reading

Please share!
Posted in Canon Law, One Man & One Woman, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , , | 32 Comments

Prof. Peter’s and a scary thought about can. 1387

The Canonical Defender, Prof. Ed Peters, has posted something that shook me a little, when I think of the implications it could have for priests who are less than committed to the Church’s moral teachings.  He has an article in … Continue reading

Please share!
Posted in 1983 CIC can. 915, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , | 18 Comments