Tag Archives: consubstantial

If a six-year old can get it right…

From a readerette:
Father,
Back before the new translation was implemented, I talked to my six year old son about the changes and what the new words meant. Since, then, it hasn’t come up again until today.
We were in the car and my kids … Continue reading

FacebookEmailPinterestGoogle GmailShare/Bookmark
Posted in "But Father! But Father!", 1983 CIC can. 915, Just Too Cool, Lighter fare, Linking Back, WDTPRS | Tagged , | 1 Comment

QUAERITUR: When priests and Catholics just don’t care enough to get it right.

From a reader:
I am wondering what the difference of changing “one in being with the Father” to “consubstantial” is in the Creed? Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for being in line with the original Latin and most precise
translation. However, I go … Continue reading

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , | 18 Comments

What NOT to do if you don’t like the new translation

I have often said that people who don’t like the new, corrected translation of the Roman Missal should protest by refusing to use it and using instead only Latin.
Someone else thinks that it might be good to go to a … Continue reading

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, New Translation, Throwing a Nutty | Tagged , , , , , | 33 Comments

“Consubstantial” – Who do people REALLY say that He is?

The new translation contains an alarming new threat.
"Consubstantial"
By clinging to the inaccurate rendering of "consubstantialem Patri" in the Creed as "one in being with the Father", liberals obfuscate the dogma of the Church that Jesus is God, that He is … Continue reading

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, SESSIUNCULA, WDTPRS | Tagged , , , , , , , | 114 Comments