24 Aug: Bartholomew, Apostle – and a menu suggestion (for tomorrow)

I have an affection for today’s saint not only for the way in which he died (a way of being treated familiar to many priests of more traditional leaning) but also because my first ecclesiastical office was as rector of a small 700 year old church in Italy named for Sts. Peter and Bartholomew. Why it was named for that pair of saints is lost in time, I fear.

Here is the Roman Martyrology entry for today’s saint, the Apostle Bartholomew:

Festum sancti Bartholomaei, Apostoli, qui idem ac Nathanael plerumque creditus, Canae Galilaeae ortus, apud Iordanem a Philippo ad Christum Iesum ductus est; postea Dominus ad se sequendum eum vocavit et Duodecim aggregavit; post Ascensionem Domini Evangelium in India ipse praedicasse traditur ibique martyrio coronatus esse.The feast of Saint Bartholomew, Apostle, who is commonly believed to the same person as Nathaniel, sprung from Cana in Galilee, he was led by Philip to Christ Jesus at the Jordan; later the Lord called him to follow Him and we was reckoned among the Apostles; after the Ascension of the Lord it is traditionally held that he preached the Gospel in India and there was crowned with martyrdom.

St. Bartholomew is depicted in art either being flayed (his skin being peeled off his body while still alive) or holding a knife and sometimes his own skin. In the Sistine Chapel in Michelangelo’s Last Judgement you see the artist’s self-portrait in the face part of the skin which the Apostle is holding.

St. Augustine speaks about today’s Gospel reading which concerns Bartholomew and the meaning of the fig tree under which the future Apostle was sitting.

This passage might be a good point of reflection for somewhat loftier ecclesiastics.

It also returns us to our often encountered theme of Christ as Physician of the soul.

This is from Augustine’s Tractate on the Gospel of John 7 (on John 1:34-51 – emphases and comments mine, but not the translation).

20. Jesus then saw this man [Nathaniel = Bartholomew?] in whom was no guile, and said, “Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile.” Nathanael saith unto Him, “Whence knowest Thou me?” Jesus answered and said, “Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig (that is, under the fig-tree), ….

21. We must inquire whether this fig-tree signifies anything. Listen, my brethren. We find the fig-tree cursed because it had leaves only, and not fruit. In the beginning of the human race, when Adam and Eve had sinned, they made themselves girdles of fig leaves. Fig leaves then signify sins. Nathanael then was under the fig-tree, as it were under the shadow of death. The Lord saw him, he concerning whom it was said, “They that sat under the shadow of death, unto them hath light arisen.” What then was said to Nathanael? Thou sayest to me, O Nathanael, “Whence knowest thou me?” Even now thou speakest to me, because Philip called thee. He whom an apostle had already called, He perceived to belong to His Church. O thou Church, O thou Israel, in whom is no guile! if thou art the people, Israel, in whom is no guile, thou hast even now known Christ by His apostles, as Nathanael knew Christ by Philip. But His compassion beheld thee before thou knewest Him, when thou wert lying under sin. For did we first seek Christ, and not He seek us? Did we come sick to the Physician, and not the Physician to the sick? Was not that sheep lost, and did not the shepherd, leaving the ninety and nine in the wilderness, seek and find it, and joyfully carry it back on his shoulders? Was not that piece of money lost, and the woman lighted the lamp, and searched in the whole house until she found it? And when she had found it, “Rejoice with me,” she said to her neighbors, “for I have found the piece of money which I lost.” In like manner were we lost as the sheep, lost as the piece of money; and our Shepherd found the sheep, but sought the sheep; the woman found the piece of money, but sought the piece of money. What is the woman? The flesh of Christ. What is the lamp? “I have prepared a lamp for my Christ.” Therefore were we sought that we might be found; having been found, we speak. Let us not be proud, for before we were found we were lost, if we had not been sought. Let them then not say to us whom we love, and whom we desire to gain to the peace of the Catholic Church, “What do you wish with us? Why seek you us if we are sinners?” We seek you for this reason that you perish not: we seek you because we were sought; we wish to find you because we have been found.

[I wonder what Augustine would have thought about the public embarrassment and timidity of some Catholics today?]

22. When, then, Nathanael had said “Whence knowest Thou me?” the Lord said to him, “Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig-tree, I saw thee.” O thou Israel without guile, whosoever thou art O people living by faith, before I called thee by my apostles, when thou wast under the shadow of death, and thou sawest not me, I saw thee. The Lord then says to him, “Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig-tree, thou believest: thou shalt see a greater thing than these.” What is this, thou shalt see a greater thing than these? And He saith unto him, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, ye shall see heaven open, and angels ascending and descending upon the Son of man.” Brethren, this is something greater than “under the fig-tree I saw thee.” For it is more that the Lord justified us when called than that He saw us lying under the shadow of death. For what profit would it have been to us if we had remained where He saw us? Should we not be lying there? What is this greater thing? When have we seen angels ascending and descending upon the Son of man?

I can’t think of a better way to honor the saint than eating ficchi e prosciutto that is, figs with prosciutto, both for the image from the Gospel and also for the thinly sliced strips of raw meat, which is more than appropriate today, and wondrous to taste I must say.

Given that it is Friday, perhaps you can do this tomorrow.  I don’t think the saint would mind.

Here is the Church in Rome where the body of the Apostle is found.  San Bartolomeo is on the island in the Tiber River.

About Fr. John Zuhlsdorf

Fr. Z is the guy who runs this blog. o{]:¬)
This entry was posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.


  1. Mary Jane says:

    LUV prosciutto! I have been to San Bartolomeo – very beautiful.

  2. Mom2301 says:

    I have also had an affection for Bartholomew but for less serious reasons. As a child I went with a close family friend to her church VBS (it was a non-descript Christian church). For years they would put together a program and we would sing a song about the 12 Apostles. Each child was assigned a line about their apostle. Every apostle had some neat line about who they were or what they did. Sons of thunder, beloved apostle etc. The only exception was Bartholomew. I was assigned the Bartholomew verse every year which consisted of “…and Bartholomew”. I attributed this to the fact that I was unapologetically Catholic even at the age of 5 and in another church. It really may have been because I couldn’t (still can’t) carry a tune in a bucket. The less I had to sing the better for those present. The blessing is I still have a special affection for poor St. Bartholomew who received no accolades, just stuck on the end. Sometimes we all feel that way.

  3. teomatteo says:

    mom2301, your lament ’bout poor St. Bartholomew not getting any respect, what with being tagged on the end of your song. Reminds me of the old Gilligan’s Isl. theme song when during the first season it ended with: “…and the rest…”. They changed the song the next season to include the Professor and Mary Anne. I’ve always felt bad about that. And they were the nicest!

  4. APX says:

    Unfortunately, I can’t bring myself to eat prosciutto. I bought some once not knowing exactly what it was (it was sliced meat and 75% off, and I needed something for a sandwich, so I bought it). When I took it out of the packaging, it reminded me too much of the pictures of the thinly sliced cadavers in my brother’s anatomy textbook I was reading once. When I think of prosciutto, I now think of cadavers.

  5. Chris Garton-Zavesky says:


    I’ll pass on the food idea to my wife. (Attempting to practice food is, for me, roughly the equivalent of choosing a tone-deaf person to sing the National Anthem.)

    Would today be a good day for the ceremonial burning of all heretical songs in Catholic “worship aids”, given that it is the anniversary of the St. Bartholemew’s Day Massacre?

    God bless,


  6. Manhattan Trid says:

    Don’t forget the mead: “St. Bartholomew is the patron saint of beekeepers and honey-makers, and for this reason it was traditional in England for the honey crop to be gathered on August 24. Since the main ingredient in mead—an ancient alcoholic drink that is still made in some parts of England today—is honey, the Blessing of the Mead is also observed on St. Bartholomew’s Day. In St. Mount’s Bay, Cornwall, a special ceremony is held by the Almoner of the Worshipful Company of Mead Makers (One thinks he may have just found a new side job). It begins with a church service, and then the participants move to the Mead Hall, where the Almoner, who is also the vicar of the parish, blesses the mead that has been fermenting for two years and pours it into a special cup. The mead can then be moved to a storage vat. In the past, mead was traditionally drunk from a bowl, known as a mazer, made from birds-eye maple with a silver rim.”
    From Society of St. Hugh of Cluny http://sthughofcluny.org/2012/08/in-festis-s-bartholoma%e2%80%8bei-apostoli.html

  7. Gregory DiPippo says:

    Optime Pater,

    There is no good reason to believe that the face of St. Bartholomew in the skin as painted by Michelangelo is a self-portait of the artist. Giorgio Vasari, who invented art history and was a personal friend of Michelangelo, does not say that the face is his. Neither does Fr. Miniato Pinti in the letter which he wrote to Vasari in 1545, noting that the face in the flayed skin has no beard, while the Apostle himself does have a beard. The first person to claim that the face of St. Bartholomew is that of Michelangelo, Francesco La Cava, did so in 1925 – in modern terms, it is as if the guy getting his face melted off in Raiders of the Lost Ark were played by Steven Spielberg, and no one notices until 2365 A.D.

  8. MangiaMamma says:

    I love the idea of figs and prosciutto for tomorrow, of course. We will, however be celebrating my husband’s patron saint, St. King Louis, tomorrow with an abundance of French food including roasted leg of lamb, provincal-style, roasted pomme de terre and gluten-free brioche for hubby along with meringue & strawberries all served with French wine.
    This will be heartily enjoyed after getting to attend morning Mass at St. Louis Church in St. Louis, Oregon which happens to also be the second oldest church in the state.
    St. Louis- priez pour nous!

  9. Nathaniel was the saint’s actual name. “Bartholomew” (from the Greek “Bartholomaios”) comes from the Aramaic “bar-Tôlmay” which means, literally, “son of Tolmay (Ptolemy)” or “son of the furrows” (in other words, the son of a ploughman). He is identified as Nathaniel in the gospel of John, but as Bartholomew in the other three Gospels.

    Just thought you’d all like to know.

  10. acroat says:

    The often forgotten Apostle has interceded for me often on his feast day. In 2004 I could not find a novena imploring his intercession. Does anyone know of one?

  11. irishgirl says:

    St. Bartholomew’s day is also the anniversary of the foundation of the first monastery of St. Teresa’s Discalced Carmelite Reform, St. Joseph’s in Avila! And this year marks 450 years since its foundation!

  12. Nun2OCDS says:

    We heard a rather banal homily by a Franciscan who had served in the Holy Land for several years. He said many theologians had come up with fanciful meanings for “under the fig tree.” He had visited Cana often and knew how hot it was. Nathanial sat under the fig tree for the shade!

Comments are closed.