"The great Father Zed, Archiblogopoios"
-
Fr. John Hunwicke
"Some 2 bit novus ordo cleric"
- Anonymous
"Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a traditionalist blogger who has never shied from picking fights with priests, bishops or cardinals when liturgical abuses are concerned."
- Kractivism
"Father John Zuhlsdorf is a crank"
"Father Zuhlsdorf drives me crazy"
"the hate-filled Father John Zuhlsford" [sic]
"Father John Zuhlsdorf, the right wing priest who has a penchant for referring to NCR as the 'fishwrap'"
"Zuhlsdorf is an eccentric with no real consequences" -
HERE
- Michael Sean Winters
"Fr Z is a true phenomenon of the information age: a power blogger and a priest."
- Anna Arco
“Given that Rorate Coeli and Shea are mad at Fr. Z, I think it proves Fr. Z knows what he is doing and he is right.”
- Comment
"Let me be clear. Fr. Z is a shock jock, mostly. His readership is vast and touchy. They like to be provoked and react with speed and fury."
- Sam Rocha
"Father Z’s Blog is a bright star on a cloudy night."
- Comment
"A cross between Kung Fu Panda and Wolverine."
- Anonymous
Fr. Z is officially a hybrid of Gandalf and Obi-Wan XD
- Comment
Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a scrappy blogger popular with the Catholic right.
- America Magazine
RC integralist who prays like an evangelical fundamentalist.
-Austen Ivereigh on
Twitter
[T]he even more mainline Catholic Fr. Z. blog.
-
Deus Ex Machina
“For me the saddest thing about Father Z’s blog is how cruel it is.... It’s astonishing to me that a priest could traffic in such cruelty and hatred.”
- Jesuit homosexualist James Martin to BuzzFeed
"Fr. Z's is one of the more cheerful blogs out there and he is careful about keeping the crazies out of his commboxes"
- Paul in comment at
1 Peter 5
"I am a Roman Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
I am a TLM-going Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
And I am in a state of grace today, in no small part, because of your blog."
- Tom in
comment
"Thank you for the delightful and edifying omnibus that is your blog."-
Reader comment.
"Fr. Z disgraces his priesthood as a grifter, a liar, and a bully. -
- Mark Shea
Thanks, Father.
Thank you, father Z, for these podcasts.
In Peter Kwasniewski’s remarks on “Active participation” he refers to a reason that such participation was lacking and needed, prior to Vatican II, to be revitalized. That reason was (if I am spelling it correctly) was debotcio moderna, which according to Google Translate means “modern devotion”. Does anyone know what he was referring to?
Veritas Vincit,
Devotio Moderna (DM) does mean Modern Devotion, but modern circa the 14th century, and lasting until the protestant revolt (though its progeny remain, e.g. in the Jesuits’ Spiritual Exercises). If you’re familiar with Thomas a Kempis’ The Imitation of Christ, you’re familiar with DM.
Kwasniewski’s brief reference is, I think, really to a series of pendular overcorrections, one of which was how DM saw the Catholicism, and her liturgy, of its day as overemphasising empty gesture and lacking interior spirituality, and so it focused on those interior things, viz. contemplation, meditation, etc., and shied away from the exterior expression of the same.
This pendulum swung too far in the other direction, and the interior things are overemphasised and liturgy and participation in liturgy are diminished. Additionally, without the cohesive effect of that emphasis on exterior communal liturgy, religious expression is atomised (indeed, we can see elements of DM in Luther and the other protestant “reformers,” as partial impetus for the individualistic aspects of the protestant revolt).
Note that the current promoters of active participation in fact share much of the motivation of the proponents of DM, though instead of developing an active interior spirituality by deemphasising distracting hollow externals, they seem to be attempting to use hollow externals to distract from a lack of internal activity.
While it does not address DM directly, the paragraph immediately preceding our gracious host’s narration gives some useful context:
It’s tempting to simply quote the entire book; so many things tie together, it’s difficult to stop at just one piece.
The book, if you’re inclined to read it, is Kwasniewski, Peter. Resurgent in the Midst of Crisis: Sacred Liturgy, the Traditional Latin Mass, and Renewal in the Church
That was longer than I hoped I’d be, but hopefully there’s something useful in there.
I think the definition of words is the problem for me. How can you participate if you are not doing something. (But I don’t think you have to actively do something for it to be good)
Do I participate when I go hear a concert? For me no. But I do participate with the other listeners in the experience? Yes. So I can just be somewhere and participate in the experience, but not in the act of the performance.
But why do people feel you have to do something at the altar? Someone has to be in the audience. Someone has to repair things. Someone has to clean. Someone has to buy the flowers and the candles. Why does everyone think they need to be front and center to be important?
Father – thank you for doing this again this year. It has been really helpful for my Advent preparation in previous years. Thank you!
I participate in the Mass by kneeling and praying, joining my prayers to those of the priest offering the sacrifice of the Mass. Of course I’m doing something – I’m praying!
Thank you Nathaniel. Relistening to Kwasniewski (who is quoting an address by Pope St John Paul II) makes clear that his reference to Devotio Moderna is to pre-Vatican II devotion.
Whatever else one can say about popular devotion during the Mass, there was a genuine overcorrection to physical as opposed to interior participation, which was not at all what the Council Fathers intended. But there was a need for correction. The common pre-Vatican II practice of the laity reciting the Rosary during the Mass, makes that clear.
Such corrections are often like a pendulum, which doesn’t stop in the middle but swings from one extreme to the other.
Pingback: SATVRDAY EDITION – Big Pulpit