Damian is Unbound.
Go right away to Damian Thompson’s latest podcast, an interview with Ed Condon.
Damn!
The synod and the sex scandal: two time bombs threatening Pope Francis’s moral authority
His comments and Condon’s comments on the upcoming Synod (“walking together”) – indeed the whole apparatus in Rome right now – are pure TNT.
A favorite moment… 5:00-6:48. If nothing else!
I rewound several times.
Coat of Arms by D Burkart
Loading ...
A Daily Prayer for Priests
Nota bene: I do not answer these numbers or this Skype address. You won't get me "live". I check for messages regularly.
WDTPRS
020 8133 4535
651-447-6265
on ASK FATHER: Father omits both “for all” and “for many” from the consecration of the Precious Blood. Wherein Fr. Z rants.: “I think even laymen not “adequately formed” rightly observe: why is the sacrament of baptism (rightly) invalid when Father Idiot…”
on ASK FATHER: Father omits both “for all” and “for many” from the consecration of the Precious Blood. Wherein Fr. Z rants.: “I have long imagined that Jerome casting the Dominical Words of Institution into Latin was using pro multis in the…”
on A new kind of “Motu Proprio”?: ““How do you do, fellow kids. I too am a hip fellow.” The Cringe-O-Meter is off the charts.”
on A new kind of “Motu Proprio”?: “The Borg Collective, connected via a subspace matrix of some fashion, was able to literally send each other good vibes…”
on A new kind of “Motu Proprio”?: “According to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, the product of the uncertainties in Energy and Time is greater than or equal…”
on Happy 17th Birthday to the Blog!: “Happy 17th Blog Birthday! Speaking on behalf of all those who have, are, and shall lurk here your silent followers:…” on A new kind of “Motu Proprio”?: “It seems to me that encouraging and accepting the prayers of pagans that are directed to entities other than the…”
on ASK FATHER: Does “for all” instead of “for many” make the Mass invalid? Should I receive Communion if I doubt validity?: “Charles: I think I will deal with your scenario in a post.”
on A new kind of “Motu Proprio”?: “It’s one thing to meet people where they are. It’s another thing to leave them there when they’re in a…”
on Happy 17th Birthday to the Blog!: “Congratulations! This convert has depended on you for r e a l knowledge of things Catholic for years and years.…”
on A new kind of “Motu Proprio”?: “This is not the first time he has made this request, apparently there is no difference between prayer, thoughts or…”
on ASK FATHER: Are there still “partial indulgences”? Notes on indulgences in general.: “Dear Sevens Dad, thank you, that is a great honor.”
on ASK FATHER: Does “for all” instead of “for many” make the Mass invalid? Should I receive Communion if I doubt validity?: “Suppose the priest says: “for you, for the forgiveness of sins” omitting both “for all” and “for many”? I wish…”
PLEASE subscribe via PayPal if it is useful.
That way I have steady income I can plan on, and you wind up regularly on my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I periodically say Holy Mass.
In view of the rapidly changing challenges I now face, I would like to add more $10/month subscribers. Will you please help?
For a one time donation...
My "challenge coin" for my 25th anniversary of ordination in 2016.
Want one? I do exchanges with military and LEOs, etc.
Loading ...If you travel internationally, this is a super useful gizmo for your mobile internet data. I use one. If you get one through my link, I get data rewards.
Loading ...
They find you a pro-life agent in your area who commits to giving a portion of the fee to a pro-life group!
Help Monks in Wyoming (coffee – UPDATED LINK) and Norcia (beer) and the wonderful "Soap Sisters" of Summit, NJ!
Please follow me on Twitter!
Use my code for a discount
Visits tracked by Statcounter
since Sat., 25 Nov. 2006:
The judgment of Dr. Thompson as to the idiocy of Cardinal Baldissieri is well taken in my view and is one to which I have nothing to add.
“That’s the kind of insight you associate with teenagers while they’re passing the spliff around”
Oh how I laughed, because it’s true.
“A favorite moment… 5:00-6:48. ”
I used to be involved with all things of the New Age “mysticism”, to my shame, and I can tell you that those quotes from the IL are straight out the new age “bible”.
Damian lost me at 8:52, when he said Francis “hasn’t made any changes unless you count what he did with the death penalty, and I think he was right about that…”.
I cannot understand, at all, why any Catholic would think it perfectly alright for Francis to alter the church’s position on the death penalty when it is definitely scriptural, it comes right out of both the Old and the New Testament, and has been taught by over 200 popes as morally acceptable, and then for Francis to quote only himself as to why he made the change, that any Catholic worth his salt should say he was not empowered to make in the first place. Changing Catholicism is not his job, guarding the faith is his job and passing it down intact.
As far as the Amazon synod, we are about at the end of the road with this. Catholics are being led to perdition, the IL should have told Catholics all they need to know. We should not need a living soul to warn us from this point on.
Damian Thompson is his usual articulate self, with a keen eye for the liberal absurdities that people in power try to justify.
Ed Condon, however, sounds like a papalotrous spin meister.
Consider: Many years ago the reason given for the introduction of permanent deacons was the lack of clerics to attend to certain areas with primitive people in S America.
Sound familiar?
Should be:
That people in power use to try to justify questionable actions.
Since his emergence on 13 March 2013 I’ve had the terribly unpleasant experience of being entirely correct [which surely contradicts the laws not only of my own nature, but nature itself] about him and his agenda. The resignation rendered a month earlier was the drumroll on the discordance yet to be endured. He never fails to confirm my initial estimation. But I’m surely not alone in that experience. I found the conversation between Thompson and Condon while in many ways insightful and honest, somewhat stuck in the past. All that has transpired was to be anticipated and is now tired, all that is to come is equally predictable, virtually assured, and already quite rancid. The question now is how to break the cycle, because a cycle of institutional self-destruction is well established. Who, what, is going to provide the wallop providing the ecclesiastical wake-up call? We appear to be on a terrible jag, and another cocktail will not do the trick.
Who, what, is going to provide the wallop providing the ecclesiastical wake-up call? We appear to be on a terrible jag, and another cocktail will not do the trick.
I am unable to imagine anything within the current visible ranks of the priesthood that has the ability to provide the wallop. Given how many cardinals signed up for Francis, and how many more he has appointed, it is unimaginable that any soon-to-occur consistory could elect a cardinal that would kick the bums out. I think the wallop has to come from out that group, i.e. the first priest, Jesus Christ, who is going to have to step in and make corrections. I don’t know how, but it probably will get worse before it gets better.