Daily Rome Shot 1698: a great book

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

Have you read this? It is a ripping read!

The Great Siege, Malta 1565: Clash of Cultures: Christian Knights Defend Western Civilization Against the Moslem Tide.

US HERE – UK HERE

The person of Jean de la Vallette is amazing. His life demonstrates something of the stakes involved, for he had spent some time as a galley slave. He understood well what awaited the vanquished and he set himself with resolve in the face of the Islamic threat.

For the curious, here is the Latin of the tomb of this great Catholic solider.

HIC ASIAE LIBYAEQUE PAVOR TUTELAQUE QUONDAM
EUROPAE EDOMITIS SACRA PER ARMA GETIS
PRIMUS IN HAC ALMA QUAM CONDIDIT URBE SEPULTUS
VALLETTA AETERNO DIGNUS HONORE JACET

White to move and mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Leave a comment

What Does The Prayer (Hymn) Really Say? Ave Maris Stella (Feasts of the B.V.M.)

Let’s have a look at the hymn from the Common of Feasts of the Blessed Virgin, Ave Maris Stella.

This hymn has been attributed to Fortunatus and, because of his deepply Marian devotion, St. Bernard.  However it is in a 9th c. manuscript.   This hymn came into the Roman Breviary without tinkering, one of the few.

Eusebius tried to interpret the name of Mary, Miryam, as coming for the Hebrew for “drop of the sea”.  Jerome went with this, and wrote Latin STILLA Maris.  But a copyist transcribed it wrong and got STELLA maris.  Eventually Isidore in his Etymologies spread this.  By the 8th c. we were signing hymns to Mary “Star of the Sea” and waxing eloquent about this poetic image.  Bernard of Clairvaux preached (Homilia II super “Missus est,” 17):

“If the winds of temptation arise; if you are driven upon the rocks of tribulation look to the star, call on Mary. If you are tossed upon the waves of pride, of ambition, of envy, of rivalry, look to the star, call on Mary. Should anger, or avarice, or fleshly desire violently assail the frail vessel of your soul, look at the star, call upon Mary. If you have fallen victim to some heinous crime, if you are overwhelmed by the reproaches of an evil conscience, if you fear being engulfed in the whirlpool of doubt or an abyss of sorrows, think of Mary, call upon Mary.”

The lines in the 7 short stanzas are in trochaic dimeter brachycatalectic, a six-syllable line composed of three falling, stressed–unstressed beats. We are using word stress not length of syllables at this point. We can break down the meter. A trochee is a metrical foot consisting of a stressed syllable followed by an unstressed syllable: DUM-da. Dimeter means the line contains two metrical units or metra. In trochaic verse, each complete metron normally contains two trochees. A full trochaic dimeter would therefore have four trochaic feet, or eight syllables: DUM-da | DUM-da || DUM-da | DUM-da. However, this is brachycatalectic or “shortened at the end.” The final metron is reduced, leaving three trochees, hence six syllables: DUM-da | DUM-da | DUM-da.

The opening of Ave Maris Stella illustrates the pattern:

Áve | máris | stélla
Déi | Máter | álma
átque | sémper | Vírgo
félix | cáeli | pórta

Each line has six syllables arranged, broadly speaking, as three falling rhythmic feet. Thus:

Á-ve | má-ris | stél-la
stressed–unstressed | stressed–unstressed | stressed–unstressed

There is a rocking quality to it, much as Mary might rock her spiritual children, and we might be rocked with her on the high sea of life.

LATIN ENGLISH COMMENTS
Ave maris stella,
Dei Mater alma,
Atque semper Virgo,
Felix cæli porta.
Hail, star of the sea,
loving Mother of God,
and ever Virgin,
happy gate of heaven.
Four titles!  A porta is a door, but this recalls portus, harbor.  Mary steers us to the “port/portal” because she is the “port/portal” by which the Savior came.
Sumens illud Ave
Gabriélis ore,
Funda nos in pace,
Mutans Hevæ nomen.
Taking that Hail
from Gabriel’s mouth,
cast us in peace,
changing Eve’s name.
There is a play on the words “Ave” and “Eva”.  Mary is the second more successful Eve.
Solve vincla reis,
Profer lumen cæcis,
Mala nostra pelle,
Bona cuncta posce.
Break the bonds of sinners,
bring light to the blind,
drive away our ills
ask for all good things.
Petitions.
Monstra te esse matrem,
Sumat per te preces,
Qui pro nobis natus,
Tulit esse tuus.
Show yourself a mother,
let He who, born for us,
who chose to be your Son
receive prayers through you.
Petitions are answered by her divine motherhood, as Mother of God, like the Davidic Queen by the throne of her Son.
Virgo singuláris,
Inter omnes mitis,
Nos culpis solútos
Mites fac et castos.
Virgin unequaled,
meekest among all,
make us freed from guilt,
meek and chaste.
Purity is ultimately necessary for access to the Beatific Vision.
Vitam præsta puram,
Iter para tutum,
Ut vidéntes Iesum,
Semper collætémur.
Grant us a pure life,
prepare a safe journey,
that, seeing Jesus,
We may always rejoice.
Sit laus Deo Patri,
Summo Christo decus,
Spirítui Sancto,
Tribus honor unus.
Amen.
Praise to God the Father,
glory to Christ the Highest,
and to the Holy Spirit,
one honor to all Three.
Amen.
Posted in Our Solitary Boast, SESSIUNCULA, WDTPRS |
Leave a comment

8 September – Feast of the Nativity of Mary and a “flash of anamnesis”

The Nativity of Mary, which we celebrate on 8 September is older than the Feast of the Immaculate Conception, which was precisely nine months ago.

Stop for a moment.  Consider what our eternal prospects were before the birth not only of Our Lord, but also before the birth of His Mother, from whom He took our human nature, the Blessed Virgin Mary.

Ponder the state of slavery to sin in which we were bound and, after death, the strong possibility of everlasting separation from God.

Given what our prospects were, celebrating the birth of our fallen humanity’s solitary boast is a really good idea.

Holy Church, in celebrating liturgically her holy birth for a long time, ultimately reasoned back to Mary’s holy conception. As St. Thomas Aquinas argued,

“The Church celebrates the feast of our Lady’s Nativity. Now the Church does not celebrate feasts except of those who are holy. Therefore, even in her birth the Blessed Virgin was holy. Therefore, she was sanctified in the womb.” (STh III, q. 27, a. 1)

As we worship, so do we believe.

As we believe, so do we worship.

Change our worship you change belief, and vice versa.

We are our rites.

Here is the entry in the Roman Martyrology for today’s feast of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary:

Festum Nativitatis beatae Mariae Virginis, ex semine Abrahae, de tribu Iuda ortae, ex progenie regis David, e qua Filius Dei natus est, factus homo de Spiritu Sancto, ut homines vetusta servitute peccati liberaret.

The feast of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary, sprung from the seed of Abraham [and] from the tribe of Judah, from the line of David the king, from which was born the Son of God, made man of the Holy Ghost, that he might free men from the ancient slavery to sin.

We can look at her Collect as well.

Fámulis tuis, quaesumus, Dómine, cœléstis grátiæ munus impertíre: ut, quibus beátæ Vírginis partus éxstitit salútis exórdium; Nativitátis eius votíva sollémnitas pacis tríbuat increméntum.

That impertire looks like the infinitive of impertio, and it is!  However, there is also a deponent verb impertior, which would make that form an imperative.  After all, we need a verb in there, right?   It’s a little tricky to deal with that quibus.

Bestow upon Your servants, we beseech You, O Lord, the gift of heavenly grace: so that, for whom the birth of the Blessed Virgin projected the beginning of our salvation, the solemn feast of her Nativity may bring about an increase of peace.

Fámulis tuis, qu?sumus, Dómine, cœléstis grátiæ munus impertíre:
??? ut
??? [Relative clause] quibus beátæ Vírginis partus éxstitit salútis exórdium
??? [Main ut-clause] Nativitátis eius votíva sollémnitas pacis tríbuat increméntum

Right now, the gravely voice of the late Fr. Reginald Foster is growling into the ear of my memory. “Zuhlsdorf! What is that quibus doing in the sentence?” “It’s a dative of reference referring to famulis tuis.” “AND?!?” “It’s the implicit explanation for the petition, a hinge that takes us from memory of the exordium to what we look for in the future. It’s a “flash of anamnesis.” “Very poetic.”

The quibus clause is a kind of hinge, deliberately placed between the ut and main petition. Even in the recitation of the prayer that quibus catches our attention. It is a reminder of the “why” we are celebrating the feast by linking the petition with the event in salvation history. This structure is often found in our Roman Collects. William Durandus of Mende (†1296 – aka Durandus) in his Rationale divinorum officiorum (IV, 14), explains a Collect’s ordering:

In orationibus tria continentur: invocatio Dei, commemoratio beneficiorum, petitio iustorum. … In the prayers three things are contained: the invocation of God, the commemoration of His benefits, and the petition for what is just.”

He also points out the intercalated relative clauses:

Saepe etiam interponitur clausula quae ostendit causam vel rationem, cur petatur. … Often too a clause is inserted which shows the cause or reason why the petition is made.”

That is exactly what quibus is doing in the Collect for the Nativity of Mary. Quibus supplies the “ratio” of the petition. Because Mary’s birth once brought salvation, the present feast can bring peace.

Posted in Our Solitary Boast, WDTPRS |
Leave a comment

Your Sunday Sermon Notes – 15th Sunday after Pentecost (N.O.: 23rd Ordinary)

My Mass intention today is for my benefactors, those of you who donate regularly, ad hoc, or send things.

Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all. Share the good stuff.

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at your Mass of obligation for this 15th Sunday after Pentecost in the Vetus Ordo (23rdd Ordinary Sunday in the Novus Ordo)?

Tell us about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass.

Any local changes or (hopefully good) news?

A taste of what I offered at 1 Peter 5 this week.

[…]

Paul then turns to the relationship of the teacher and the taught: “Let him who is taught the word share all good things with him who teaches” (v. 6).  κοινωνέω, koinōnéō, means to share or make another a partner. Those who receive ὁ λόγος, ho lógos, “the word,” owe support to those who faithfully teach it. “The Lord commanded that those who proclaim the gospel should get their living by the gospel” (1 Cor 9:14). The “word” received embraces Scripture, sound catechesis, doctrine embodied in sacred worship, and the Word sacramentally present in the Eucharist. Gratitude for supernatural goods should be concrete.

Do not be deceived; God is not mocked (Gal 6:7).

[…]

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
3 Comments

“We therefore are the bowels of the Church…”. We’re…. WHAT, again?

In the Gospel reading on this 15th Sunday after Pentecost, Jesus, coming from Capernaum, approaches Nain (a small town near Nazareth) accompanied by His disciples and a large crowd, just as another crowd emerges in a funeral procession.

The dead man is the only son of a widow, so she has lost both her beloved child and probably her principal means of support, thus making her an extremely vulnerable person. Jesus is moved with compassion, misericordia motus, tells her not to weep, touches the bier, and commands the young man to rise. The miracle recalls Elijah’s raising of the widow’s son at Zarephath (1 Kings 17:17–24), but Jesus acts by His own authority. The people consequently acclaim Jesus as a great prophet and declare that God has visited His people.

Let’s get some context.

Capernaum, where Jesus had been before Nain, is on the northwestern shore of the Sea of Galilee. Nain (modern Nein, also spelled Nayn) is roughly 25 miles southwest, on the northwestern slope of the Hill of Moreh, near the eastern edge of the Jezreel Valley. Depending upon the ancient road followed, the walk may have been some 30 miles. Moreover, Capernaum is some 650 feet below sea level while Nain stands about 700 feet above it.  Jesus and His company would have left Capernaum, climbed through the rugged limestone hills and narrow valleys of Lower Galilee, and then crossed more open agricultural country toward Mount Tabor and the Jezreel plain. Nain itself required a final ascent onto the slope of the Hill of Moreh. All told, 1400 feet of ascent. The distance would probably require a vigorous 10 hours or so to traverse.

Luke 7:11 says in Greek, “Καὶ ἐγένετο ἐν τῇ ἑξῆς …”. That hexes is an adverb meaning “successively, following” and is commonly in the NT as “the day after” (Luke 7:11; 9:37 and Acts 21:1; 25:17; 27:18). The LSJ has “next day” as it is applied to time The KJV says, “And it came to pass the day after…” whereas the RSV says, “Soon afterward…”. The Vulgate says, “Et factum est deinceps…”. Deinceps is “successively”, “next following”. Most English translations provide something like “soon afterwards”, but “the next day” is also represented. Luke choose to connect two healing, that of the “boy, servant” of the Centurion a Capernaum and that of the “boy/son” of the widow at Nain.

It is not unreasonable to think that the miracles presented back-to-back as they are was to stress their close temporal proximity, hence, “the next day”. “The next day”, if correct, would mean that Jesus and his followers were moving quickly. “The next day” implies that they made the march at night, though perhaps they might have started in the early hours of the next day. In any event, we can take from this that Jesus knew that He needed to be in Nain at a certain time.

Thus Luke’s brief “afterwards/the next day he went into a city that is called Naim” compresses a strenuous journey of perhaps ten or twelve hours. Jesus arrived with a large crowd in tow after a ascending march, precisely as the funeral procession was descending from the village toward the rock-cut tombs outside it. The two processions met: one accompanying the Lord of life into the town, the other carrying the dead man out of it. Jesus touches the bier and raises the dead man to life. Touching the bier would have made others ritually impure, but ceremonial defilement cannot pass from the corpse to the Lord of life. Instead, life passes from Christ to the dead man.

I was interested to know what Fathers of the Church commented about this moment so I did a little drilling.

The Fathers saw in the widow an image of Holy Mother Church grieving over children spiritually dead through sin. St. Augustine writes: “The widowed mother rejoiced at the raising again of that young man; of men raised again in spirit day by day does Mother Church rejoice” (s. 48)

On the other hand, St. Ambrose in his Commentary on Luke urges the sinner who seems incapable of weeping sufficiently for himself: “Let mother Church weep for you”. He prayers, preaching, correction, and sacraments surround the spiritually dead until Christ speaks again through His minister, “Young man, I say to thee, arise.” Think of the sacrament of penance.

Let’s look at a snip of Ambrose, where he says this:

92. Etsi grave peccatum est, quod paenitentiae tuae lacrimis ipse lavare non possis, fleat pro te mater ecclesia, quae pro singulis tamquam pro unicis filiis vidua mater intervenit; conpatitur enim quodam spiritali dolore naturae, cum suos liberos letalibus vitiis ad mortem cernit urgueri. Viscera sumus de visceribus eius; sunt enim et spiritalia viscera, quae habet Paulus dicens: ita frater, ego te fruar in domino: refice viscera mea in Christo. Nos ergo viscera ecclesiae sumus, quoniam membra sumus corporis eius, de carne eius et de ossibus eius.

BRUTALLY LITERAL VERSION

Although it is a grave sin that you cannot wash away with the tears of your repentance, let Mother Church weep for you, who intervenes for each one as for her only children, a widowed mother; for she suffers with a certain spiritual pain of nature, when she sees her children being driven to death by deadly vices. We are the bowels of her bowels; for there are also spiritual bowels, which Paul has, saying: So brother, I enjoy you in the Lord: refresh my bowels in Christ (Philemon 20). We therefore are the bowels of the Church, because we are members of her body, of her flesh and of her bones.

Bowels?  What’s up with that?

The Latin viscera, traditionally literally in English as “bowels,” means literally the “inward parts of the body: the entrails, internal organs, or deepest physical interior of a person”. In biblical language the word frequently signifies the innermost seat of tenderness, affection, pity, and mercy.

Modern English ordinarily locates emotion in the “heart.” We say that someone is warm-hearted, broken-hearted, or moved in his heart. Biblical Hebrew used different bodily vocabulary. The heart, (lēb), was often associated with thought, judgment, intention, and decision. The kidneys could signify the hidden conscience or deepest desires. The bowels or inward parts, mēʿîm, were the seat of powerful and tender emotion. Closely related is Hebrew raḥămîm, “mercies” or “compassion.” It is related to reḥem, “womb.” Mercy is therefore imagined as something profoundly interior, instinctive, protective, and even maternal. It is the tenderness felt by a mother for the child whom she has carried within her. Hence Isaiah asks:

“Can a woman forget her infant, be without tenderness for the child of her womb? Even should she forget, I will never forget you” (Isaiah 49:15).

The Greek biblical equivalent is usually splánchna, literally the internal organs. From it comes the verb “splagchnízomai…to be moved in one’s inward parts.” The Gospels repeatedly use this verb for Christ. When He sees the crowds, the widow of Nain, or the hungry multitude, He is “moved with compassion.” The expression suggests more than an intellectual recognition of suffering. Christ is shaken in His deepest interior and moved to act.

The Vulgate frequently renders splánchna with viscera. Thus the Benedictus describes the Incarnation:

Per viscera misericordiae Dei nostri, in quibus visitabit nos oriens ex alto … Through the bowels of mercy of our God, whereby the Dayspring from on high hath visited us” (Luke 1:78).

Viscera misericordiae means “the deepest inward tenderness of God’s mercy.” God’s mercy springs from the very depths of His love. The expression does not imply that God possesses bodily organs. It is biblical anthropomorphism, bodily language used to reveal the intensity and intimacy of divine compassion. Saint Paul uses the expression with striking intimacy:

Cupiam omnes vos in visceribus Christi Iesu … I long for you all in the bowels of Christ Jesus” (Philippians 1:8).

Paul claims to love the Philippians with Christ’s own inward tenderness. Christ’s compassion has become the interior principle of Paul’s apostolic affection.

This brings me back to this Sunday’s Mass and its readings. Besides Luke 17, we also have Gal 5:25-26; 6:1-10. Remember that chapters and verses were applied much latter, so the end of what we call chapter 5 is seamless with chapter 6.

In this Epistle reading, Saint Paul describes the practical consequences of living by the Holy Ghost: “If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.”

Grace must become visible in conduct, especially in the way Christians treat the faults, burdens, and needs of others. The spiritual man does not delight in exposing a fallen brother. He restores him “in spiritu lenitatis… in the spirit of meekness,” mindful of his own frailty.

St. John Chrysostom observes that, because no man is entirely free from faults, Paul exhorts us “not to scrutinize severely the offenses of others,” but to bear patiently with them, knowing that we shall need the same patience ourselves (cf. s. 6 On Galatians). The Church resembles a building whose stones differ in shape and function, yet each supports the others. Correction, therefore, must arise from charity rather than superiority. St. Augustine explains (tr. io. 17) that we should consider in another’s fault “what might happen to himself,” and then render the assistance we ourselves would hope to receive.

“Bear ye one another’s burdens, and so you shall fulfil the law of Christ.” Augustine states (ibid.) the principle succinctly: “The law of Christ is love,” and love reaches its fulfillment when Christians carry one another’s burdens.

Such burden-bearing includes admonishing the sinner gently, consoling the sorrowful, supporting the weak, and giving temporal help where it is needed. Paul’s warning should ring in our viscera: “What things a man shall sow, those also shall he reap.” Our habits of thought, speech, and action are seeds cast toward eternity. Weariness in doing good can become spiritually dangerous, since harvest comes only “in due time.”

The Gospel shows the law of Christ made flesh.

At the gate of Naim two processions meet. One follows a dead young man out of the city. The other follows Christ, the Lord of life, into it.

Christ here bears a burden that no human being can carry. He takes upon Himself the mother’s grief and the son’s death.

Fleat pro te mater ecclesia … let the mother Church weep for you.”

She is waiting and weeping for the fallen, the unconfessed, dead in mortal sin.

Paul’s exhortation and Luke’s miracle reveal the same divine charity. To walk in the Spirit is to join Christ’s procession of life, to bear another’s burden, to restore the fallen without pride, and to sow works of mercy.

The Lord halted the funeral at Naim to bring life from death.

“We therefore are the bowels of the Church…”.

Is there someone you know who needs to be brought back into the arms of the Church?

What can you do about it?

You can start with yourself.

GO TO CONFESSION.

Posted in GO TO CONFESSION |
2 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1697

Welcome registrant

frammisdoodle

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HERE – WHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

 

Black to move and mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
4 Comments

WDTPRS – 15th Sunday after Pentecost: The Church is taking on water. Is she sinking?

For the last few years I’ve had a terrible inkling that the Church hit an iceberg and is taking on water faster than it can be pumped.

It has ever been so, in cycles, since the Lord’s Ascension.

The Church will not sink, capsize or founder.

The Church, guaranteed by Christ to remain, will come to safe harbor even if in a single life boat.

Christ is our vessel, sails, oars, wind and navigator.

This Sunday’s Collect for Holy Mass in the Traditional Roman Rite survived the long knives of the Consilium to live on the in the Novus Ordo editions of the Missale Romanum on Monday of the 3rd Week of Lent.  Figure that one out. We find it in the 8th century Gelasian Sacramentary for a Sunday, with a minor spelling variation.  Hence, it is ancient.  There are reasons to think that the prayer is even more ancient.  Here is the text:

COLLECT (1962MR):

Ecclesiam tuam, Domine,
miseratio continuata mundet et muniat:
et quia sine te non potest salva consistere;
tuo semper munere gubernetur.

Interesting.  Usually in our Collects when we address God we add other adjectival phrases like “Omnipotens sempiterne”.  The spare “Domine” only occurs three other times (2nd Sunday of Advent, 2nd and 11th Sunday after Pentecost).

The word order is also noteworthy.  We begin with “Ecclesia tuam”, for indeed it is.  Also, in the last colon, that tuo semper munere gubernetur has a double, interlocking hyperbaton: tuo separated from munere and semper separated from gubernetur.   Moreover, in that second colon of the protasis, we have not two, but three petitions.  Easy to spot are mundet and muniat, but there is one buried in continuata miseratio.

Riveting, no?

We must not pass over the sound of this prayer.

The Roman, Latin prayers, particularly those which were handed down intact from earlier centuries, such as the time of St. Pope Leo the Great (+461), are elegantly sculpted both in their rhythm and their sounds.  Notice the wonderful alliteration throughout.  Tying the whole thing together from top to bottom are the glottal sounds (made in the back of the throat with the tongue), on the voiced or unvoiced glottal “k” sound of Ecclesiamcontinuata…quia…consistere…gubernetur.    Then we have an interlocking series of alliterations.  There are many humming “m” and “n” sounds: Ecclesiam tuam, Domine, miseratio continuata múndet et múniat…. Keep in mind that in ancient times, the final “m” was pronounced in a very nasal way, which survives in many instances in French and Portuguese.  So, this pray begins with a deep hum.  Then you shift to sibilants, the hissing “s”, with snappy “t”s along the way: et quia sine te non potest sálva consístere; tuo semper….  Then we go back to our humming “m” and “n”, but with a lovely rhythmical closure or clausulasemper múnere gúbernétúr.

Speak or sing this to get at the real beauty of this gem, with its glittering facets of phonemes.

And now the part you’ve been waiting for… vocabulary.

Gubnero was a favorite word of the great ancient Roman orator Cicero.  That feast of Latin lemmata, our thick and juicy Lewis & Short Dictionary,  says guberno is “to steer or pilot a ship”.  Logically, it also means “to direct, manage, conduct, govern, guide”. The Liddell, Scott, Jones Greek Lexicon, or LSJ, says that kubernao is “steer”, “drive” and metaphorically “guide, govern” and then “act as a pilot, i.e., perform certain rites in the Ship of Isis”.

I can’t quite imagine – don’t want to imagine – what those “rites in the Ship of Isis” are.  I suspect they involve certain Jesuits.

The super-charged word munus is a little hard to get at in English is this Collect.

A munus can be “a service, office, post, employment, function, duty”.  Should we avoid reducing God to a functionary?   It is true that God is often said in our prayers to have pietas, which carries a strong sense of “duty”, but in Latin prayers pietas, when applied to God, is really more like “mercy”.  For man the term pietas  is “duty”.  In this instance of munere, we ought to lean toward another, less common meaning in the L&S, namely, “a service, favor”.  In fact the liturgical Latin dictionary we call Blaise/Dumas has, “don, faveur (de Dieu)”.   There is a connection between munus as “duty, service” and as “gift”, in that munus stood also for a public work given to the city by an individual. For example, a great Roman might put on public games and feasts for the people, or erect a temple or public building as a munus given from civic duty as well as to increase his and his family’s gloria, that is, his share in the honor of the state.

Concerning the debate about the meaning of munus in Benedict XVI’s odd resignation speech, we must note what Card. Erdö concluded in his paper on the uses of munus, ministerium and officium.  They are used in a virtually interchangeable way across different genres of documents.  Therefore, he said that clearer definitions were needed.  This was years before Benedict issued his notification about quitting (aka running from the wolves).  I digress.

The verb consisto is “to stand still, stand, halt, stop, make a stop” but also many other sorts of “taking a stand”, such as what soldiers do when about to fight, or what you do in court to defend your position.  There is a “moral” stand one takes, as well as “stand with” someone.  However, both in the L&S and Blaise/Dumas we see that consisto can simply mean “to be, exist”.  In fact, this notion of “standing” (sisto) is also the root for existo.  It is as if, in the case of the later, that as things come into being, they “stand forth” (ex-sisto) from nothingness.

It seems to me that our author was also having a good time with the similar sounds of mundet, muniat, and munere, all very different but with phonic hooks that pull them conceptually together.

This week allow me also to play around with some alliteration in rendering our prayer, still sticking to a slavish version of the Latin lines.  I will also try to capture something of the nautical imagery.

LITERAL TRANSLATION:

Let Your continuous compassion,
cleanse and defend Your Church, O Lord,
and because without You she cannot stand to, safe,
may she forever by Your favor be steered.

Nota bene: The subject is miseratio continuata, not Domine.  But the real subject is Domine, right?  Miseratio is a replacement or personification: the Lord is Mercy Itself.

In nautical parlance, to “stand to” means to “stay on a certain course”.  This is how I try to unpack the meaning of consisto, which aims at the concept of “consistency” and “staying” firm.  Because in this world the Church is on a journey, as a pilgrim, I didn’t want simply to say “stand firm”.  But gubernator, as the master of the ship’s course, who “governs” where the ship goes, helped me think of “stand to”.  Also, I could have said “safely”, but salva is an adjective, not an adverb, and I am feeling a bit more archaic than usual as I write today.

CURRENT ICEL VERSION (2011 – during Lent):

May your unfailing compassion, O Lord, cleanse and protect your Church, and, since without you she cannot stand secure, may she be always governed by your grace.

They didn’t go for the nautical image.  Too bad.  It is impoverished as a result.

One of the meanings of munio, which gives us the muniat in the prayer (“to build a wall around, to defend with a wall, to fortify, defend; to guard, secure, strengthen, support”, for munio stems from moenia “walls”) is also “to open a road”,  viam munire.

Maybe we can get our heads into this prayer by thinking of the Church, often portrayed as a ship, as in Peter’s Barque or the sailing ship in the vision of St. John Bosco, as that fortified way through the heaving waters of the world, with its distractions both sensual and diabolical, that threaten to blow us off our course.

As they sail in dangerous waters, ships need a well-prepared steersman to govern her through the shoals and currents, to avoid the reefs and rocks hidden beneath the waves.

There are times when we have a following wind, that favors smooth and direct sailing.  At other times, we must tack back and forth to make slow headway, or even run before the wind when the sea and the storms rise in frightful force against us.

In all these conditions, the captain and navigator and steersman seek the best course for the good of the whole ship and all who sail in her, according to the charts available, personal experience, the smell of the wind, the look of the sea, and the map of the sun, moon and stars.

In many ways these images of the ship at sea exemplify the experience of the Church.  Our Popes, bishops and pastors seek the best course as they know how, seeking to guide the barque in perilous waters and times.  At least we hope they do.  Hard to tell, sometimes.

In his meditation for the Way of the Cross in 2005 Card. Ratzinger said:

Lord, your Church often seems like a boat about to sink, a boat taking in water on every side.

In his homily for the Solemnity of Sts. Peter and Paul in 2006 Benedict XVI said:

The Church – and in her, Christ – still suffers today. In her, Christ is again and again taunted and slapped; again and again an effort is made to reject him from the world. Again and again the little barque of the Church is ripped apart by the winds of ideologies, whose waters seep into her and seem to condemn her to sink. Yet, precisely in the suffering Church, Christ is victorious.

In his final General Audience (before quitting) in 2013 Benedict said:

I have felt like Saint Peter with the Apostles in the boat on the Sea of Galilee: the Lord has given us so many days of sun and of light winds, days when the catch was abundant; there were also moments when the waters were rough and the winds against us, as throughout the Church’s history, and the Lord seemed to be sleeping. But I have always known that the Lord is in that boat, and I have always known that the barque of the Church is not mine but his. Nor does the Lord let it sink; it is he who guides it, surely also through those whom he has chosen, because he so wished. This has been, and is, a certainty which nothing can shake.

Well… most of them them try to steer well and make the right decisions about wind and wave.  Some do it well.  Others … not so much.

In human terms we do our best to steer our course and we can make mistakes.

In divine terms we know that no matter how terrifying are the winds and seas which buffet us and threaten to bear away our spars and sails, Christ’s sure hand rests on the wheel.

QUAERITUR: Right now, perhaps we have a Pope who is … what would you say?   Tacking?  Running before the wind?

We can take a couple things from this.

It might feel sometimes that the Church heading for this…

Instead of this…

Firstly, nothing contrary will prevent Holy Church from finding safe harbor in Him.  We will come home to a safe landfall.

Eventually, though storms and becalmings, we will make it.

Also, when we personally get off course, we can find our way back… in the confessional.

GO TO CONFESSION.

PS: I have a Substack, too.
Please check it out and subscribe?  HERE

Posted in GO TO CONFESSION, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, WDTPRS | Tagged
2 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1696

NB: I wrote about the Collect for the Novus Ordo Sunday Mass, 23rd Ordinary Sunday at my newish Substack.  Please check it out and subscribe.  Thanks.  This is, of course, the mothership.

THANK YOU to the kind soul(s) who recently sent items from my Wish List, a book and a practical household item.  There were NO SLIPS in the two packages!   This is happening often enough to make me wonder if they have changed their M.O.

Welcome registrant

Tom deBombadillo

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

Seems this way sometimes…

I’ve been to this. Incredible.

Think fast.

Every have days like this?

White to move and mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

4 Sept: St. Moses, Old Testament prophet, lawgiver, forerunner of Christ

Today is the feast of St. Moses, lawgiver and prophet in the Old Testament.

Many people do not realize that may Old Testament figures are considered by Holy Mother Church to be saints. Many of them are listed in editions of the Roman Martyrology, both pre-Conciliar and post.

Here is today’s entry for Moses.

1. Commemoratio sancti Moysis, prophetae, quem Deus elegit, ut populum in Aegypto oppressum liberaret et in terram promissionis adduceret; cui etiam in monte Sina sese revelavit dicens: “Ego sum qui sum”, atque legem proposuit, quae vitam populi electi regeret.  Ille servus Dei in monte Nebo terrae Moab coram terra promissionis plenus dierum obiit.

Anyone want to take a crack at What The Martyrology Really Says?

Also, a question/request to readers:

Have any of you ever seen a stained-glass window of Moses at the cleft in the rock in Exodus 33?

I would like a good photo.

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols |
4 Comments

3 Sept – Anniversary of the Death of Fr. Paul Mankowski, SJ. – Rest peace Mankus Chrysokalamus!

Today I saw a piece by Phil Lawler which reminded me that yesterday was the anniversary of the death of a truly fine human being Fr. Paul Mankowski – six years ago.   Such a loss.

Lawler is entirely justified in both his praise of Fr. Mankowski as well as in his scorn for his Jesuit superiors, a certain homosexualist Jesuit, and the archbishop of a large windy see.

Not to be missed is how Mankowski went after fellow Jesuit and traitorous slime dog Robert Drinan.

Also, Manko wrote a devastating critique of Jasmine’s homosexualist crusade which outraged that windy see guy.  HERE

One thing that Lawler doesn’t cover – but must be covered – is Fr. Mankowski’s contribution to the extremely important “Five Cardinals Book”.

US HERE – UK HERE

Remaining in the Truth of Christ: Marriage and Communion in the Catholic Church contains five essays of cardinals, of the archbishop secretary of the Vatican congregation for the Oriental Churches, and of three scholars on the ideas supported by Walter Card. Kasper from which the Church is still reeling today.

Still reeling today… yes.  You will recall that it was at that 1st “Synod on the Family” 10 year ago under Francis that Kasper offered his musings about shifting truths, lived experience, and Communion for adulterers.  That stuff made its way into Amoris laetitia and the infamous footnote.  Amoris won’t die.  As a matter of fact, Leo is going to celebrate Mass for the anniversary of Amoris on 14 October and has asked convoked the presidents of the world’s Episcopal Conference to the Meeting in Rome to examine and discuss the teachings of Amoris laetitia. HERE  The Five Cardinals Book was publish simultaneously in several languages and sent through the Vatican Post to all the members of the Synod of Bishops who were meeting in Rome.  When the mandarins of the Synod figured out what was in all those envelopes they stole the books from the mailboxes (which I suspect was a violation of postal law).

To make this short, Mankowski’s essay Dominical Teaching on Divorce and Remarriage: The Biblical Data is sheer brilliance.  He proved with masterful philological expertise that the “exemption” to Our Lord’s prohibition of divorce in the case of porneia in Matthew 19 referred not to adultery or sexual licentiousness, but to incest or polygamy, in which case, there could be no marriage in the first place.

As a couple of my close friends – who worked on The Five Cardinals Book – observed today:

  • St John Chrysostom, virulent tongue, comes to mind. Exiled twice and died in exile.
  • I often go back to that chapter as starting point for personal prayer and study for how masterfully he connects marriage as willed by God and Christ proclaiming himself God and legislator because He was there as such “in the beginning”.
  • Rest peace Mankus Chrysokalamus

You will also want to see the collection made by George Weigel after Paul died.

Jesuit at Large: Essays and Reviews by Paul Mankowski, S.J.

US HERE

They are all worth it and timely.  It includes his take-down of the Jesuit homosexualist activist James Martin’s dreadful book which made the knees of so many bishops get weak, entitled “Pontifiex Minimus“.

Posted in Mail from priests | Tagged
8 Comments