LENTCAzT 2026 – 11: Ember Saturday 1st Week in Lent – “Know Thyself!”

A 5 minute daily podcast to help you in your Lenten discipline.

Today brief comments on the Roman Station, St. Peter’s on the Vatican Hill, and about the ancient Ember Days, and their “arc” according to Joseph Ratzinger. Then Card. Bacci gives us a good old fashioned talking to about the need to make a good examination of conscience.

Yesterday’s podcast – HERE

Posted in LENTCAzT, PODCAzT | Tagged , , ,
Leave a comment

On this Ember Friday we are 38 days out from Easter. What does the number 38 mean to St. Augustine?

With this Ember Friday we are 38 days out from Easter.  In the Gospel for today in the Traditional Latin Mass we have the scene from John 5 about the paralytic man waiting by the pool for the angel to stir the healing water.  He has been waiting for years… 38 years.

I sense the reason why this Gospel was chosen for this day.

In his Tractates on the Gospel of John, St. Augustine of Hippo interprets the 38 years of the man’s infirmity in John 5 as a symbolic number.

Augustine argues that 40 signifies the Law (especially the Decalogue fulfilled in the fourfold world, that is the four compass points, the whole world), while 38 is 40 – 2, thus indicating the Law lacking the two precepts of charity.

From In Ioannis Evangelium Tractatus 17, 4:

“The number forty is consecrated to the Law… For forty signifies the Law. But the Law is fulfilled in two precepts, that is, in the love of God and in the love of our neighbor… Therefore that man was infirm thirty-eight years, because he had not yet the two which complete forty.”

Augustine’s reasoning is this:

40 = the Law in its fullness.
2 = the twin commandments of love (cf. Matt 22:37–40).
38 = the Law without charity, hence spiritual paralysis.

The paralytic represents humanity under the Law without grace. Knowledge of commandments alone does not heal. Sacrificial love, charity, love infused by Christ perfects and vivifies. When Christ commands, “Rise,” He supplies what was lacking, the charity that fulfills the Law.

Hence, for Augustine, the 38 years signify a spiritual deficiency. Moral structure without the animating principle of love are inadequate.

Posted in Patristiblogging | Tagged
Leave a comment

“The bread was fresh and was good. The cheese was not and was excellent.”

There is an old phrase…

The bread was fresh and was good. The cheese was not and was excellent.

I have to share this.

I will be going to Rome before Palm Sunday and I will – without question – get some of this ASAP. The question is, picante or dolce?

I have often gotten my cheeses at Ruggieri at the Campo de’ Fiori. However, on my way home from the Campo or from The Parish™ at the Piazza Farnese there is a small “organic” grocer which has even better cheeses, though fewer choices.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

Daily Rome Shot 1559

Welcome registrant:

Uncleduge

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance (massively hiked for this new year of surprises), utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

I love this church in Paris. Inter alia, it was the seat of the Confraternity of Our Lady Queen of the Clergy.

And…

Look! Up in the sky!

Ummm… I don’t think he can do this.

White to move and mate in 4 HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

27 February – Blog Maintenance & Migration Day UPCOMING

UPDATE: On Thursday tested a migration.  It all went well.  Now we will do the real migration.

I am told that we will probably do the migration on Sunday and then repoint the DNS to the new site.

Therefore, at some point I’ll have to stop posting “live” posts and your comments may not migrate.

Things may run a little slower here but right now, this current iteration of the blog is live and open to your contributions.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
8 Comments

LENTCAzT 2026 – 10: Ember Friday 1st Week in Lent – “Ego te absolvo” is your sure guarantee!

A 5 minute daily podcast to help you in your Lenten discipline.

Today we learn about the Station of all four Ember Fridays. Pius Parsch on the happiness of a clear conscience.

The Benedictines of Gower Abbey sing to us.  [US HERE – UK HERE]

They also have this, Tenebrae at Ephesus

US HERE – UK HERE

These are the RESPONSORIES of Tenebrae for all three days of the Triduum.  They are, arguably, the most beautiful chants of the entire liturgical year.

Yesterday’s podcast – HERE

Posted in LENTCAzT, PODCAzT | Tagged , , ,
1 Comment

Two items worthy of your precious time

I bring to your attention two pieces worthy of your precious time.

First, at Crisis there is an essay by Fr. John Perricone

Why Every Catholic Is a Traditional Catholic (Or Should Be)

Perricone argues that the contemporary Catholic Church faces a crisis of language, culture, and doctrine because a radical ideological project has systematically corrupted the meaning of fundamental terms, most dangerously, “Tradition.”

Drawing on George Orwell’s critique of political language, he asserts that when words are manipulated away from their historical meanings, human cognition and communal coherence unravel, opening the door to cultural and ecclesial chaos. This manipulation is going on in the Church. The term “Tradition”, once understood as the unbroken transmission of the Apostolic faith and practice, has been redefined by modern theologians and ecclesiastical actors in ways that detach it from the faith’s perennial content and forms. Perricone contends that the assault on “Tradition” is both intellectual and symbolic, since the Church’s liturgical, artistic, linguistic, and devotional expressions historically embody and transmit Tradition’s truths. To undermine these symbols (especially sacred liturgical worship) is to undermine Tradition itself. He maintains that true Catholic fidelity consists in embracing the sacred deposit of faith and the practices that have conveyed it throughout the ages, holding fast to the doctrines, liturgy, and devotions that have shaped Catholic life and identity. In this sense, Perricone insists, every Catholic who genuinely adheres to the infallible teachings and ancient forms of the faith is, by definition, a Traditional Catholic, because to be otherwise is to abandon authentic Catholic Tradition and, ultimately, to cease being truly Catholic.

This describes well why I sometimes use catholic for, for example, some infamous Jesuits and certain writers at the Fishwrap, et alibi.

Next there is a piece at Imprimis/Hillsdale

Recovering the Lost Art of Diplomacy

The writer, A. Wess Mitchell, argues that diplomacy is a central instrument of strategic statecraft, essential for great powers to survive and gain advantage amid competition. True diplomacy is defined not by formalities or idealistic international governance but by concrete outcomes, primarily constraining the power of adversaries and reducing threats that cannot be resolved by force alone. After the Cold War, the United States allowed traditional diplomacy to atrophy, favoring military technology, economic sanctions, and global-institution idealism; this reflected erroneous assumptions on both the left (that institutions can transcend conflict) and the right (that military preponderance alone secures security). The contemporary international environment, marked by renewed great-power competition over territory, influence, and resources, demands a revival of classical diplomacy’s core function: matching national means to ends through negotiation, coalition building, and balance of power. Effective diplomacy, Mitchell contends, increases strategic flexibility, limits hostile accumulation of power, and helps avoid wars beyond a nation’s capacity. Rediscovery of these skills, he insists, is vital to national strategy in an era of renewed geopolitical rivalry.

Great military history references, too!

It would be interesting to use the article as a lens to view the present conflict between the SSPX and the Holy See, seemingly a clash between an inflexible reading of the Deposit of Faith (with little desire to consider positively things written after 1962) versus rigid canonical positivism along with ecclesiastical amnesia (the devaluation of anything that happened before 1963).

Using Mitchell’s piece as a lens, the present standoff between the SSPX and the Holy See is a failure of ecclesial diplomacy on both sides. Diplomacy, Mitchell argues, succeeds when adversaries constrain each other’s worst impulses and negotiate outcomes that avoid destructive rupture. It fails when principles are elevated above the art of sustainable coexistence.

The SSPX has publicly reaffirmed its intention to proceed with unauthorized episcopal consecrations on 1 July 2026 despite Vatican warnings that such acts would constitute a decisive rupture of ecclesial communion and incur automatic excommunication under canon law. This is where rigid canonical positivism comes in.  The Holy could choose not to impose censures, which would be the best way forward.  But that’s unlikely with this crew in Rome.  From the Society’s perspective, the consecrations are framed as necessary to ensure continuation of traditional ministry in what it deems a post-Conciliar crisis of doctrine and liturgical identity. Its superior general rejected Vatican proposals for renewed doctrinal dialogue that made suspension of the consecrations a condition of talks.

I find that approach to be too narrow.

Talking with the Holy See costs nothing and could, in fact, gain what they want.  Not guaranteed, of course.  But nothing ventured nothing gained.  The Holy See, after all, proposed a structured theological dialogue aimed at identifying minimum conditions for full regularization.   I won’t say “full communion” because that’s a nonsensical term.   Finding common ground in the minimum conditions is what has been going on in the Church for two millennia of Councils called to discuss matters of grave importance.

There is a kind of zero-sum defense on one side and, on the other, institutional inflexibility with a strong dash of ecclesiastical amnesia if not downright negationism.

 

Posted in SSPX, The Coming Storm, The Drill |
6 Comments

LENTCAzT 2026 – 09: Thursday 1st Week in Lent – Law and Order

A 5 minute daily podcast to help you in your Lenten discipline.

Today we hear about St. Lawrence, his churches in Rome and his martyrdom. Why did the Lord at first refuse a miracle to the Canaanite woman?

Yesterday’s podcast HERE

Posted in LENTCAzT, PODCAzT | Tagged , , ,
2 Comments

WDTPRS – Collect of Ember Wednesday of Lent (TLM & Novus)

I’m sure you know that only a tiny percent of the orations of the Vetus Ordo made it into the Novus Ordo unmolested.

Well… maybe that isn’t quite the right word in every case.

In some cases the Novus changed the prayer to an even more ancient form. However, ancient isn’t always better. We learn, deepen our understanding over the years. Changes ought to be careful, like the delicate pruning of a bonsai rather than the grasping rip of a stump puller.

The experts of the Consilium were not of the bonsai school in their overall approach.

Here is the Collect for Ember Wednesday in Lent.

VETUS COLLECT (1962RM):
Devotionem populi tui, quaesumus, Domine,
benignus intende:
ut, qui per abstinentiam macerantur in corpore,
per fructum boni operis reficiantur in mente.

This isn’t all that difficult.

Anyone who has been a cook recognizes the basic sense of macero. Macero is “to make soft or tender, to soften by steeping, to soak, steep, macerate”.   When applied to us it is, “to weaken in body or mind, to waste away, enervate”.

WORDY LITERAL RENDERING:
We beg You, O Lord, kindly look upon the
devotion of Your people,
with the result that they who by means of abstinence are being tenderized in respect to the body
may by means of the fruit of good work be refreshed in respect to the mind.

In the Novus Ordo the prayer is somewhat softened.  Are you getting used to that now?

NOVUS COLLECT (2002MR)
:
Devotionem populi tui, quaesumus, Domine,
benignus intende,
ut, qui per abstinentiam temperantur in corpore,
per fructum boni operis reficiantur in mente.

The Novus Ordo redactors sliced out macero and put in tempero, related to temperatioTempero… or….  temperor?  There is a deponent temperor.   Temperantur can be either passive or active.  Tempero is “to observe proper measure; to moderate or restrain one’s self; to forbear, abstain; to be moderate or temperate”. We can also use this word to indicate the mixing of liquids, such as when water is added to wine in a cup, according to ancient usage. Tempero also means, “to forbear, abstain, or refrain from; to spare, be indulgent to any thing”.  Think of the virtue temperance.   Temperor is “to divide or proportion duly, mingle in due proportion”, like in the wine example above.  It is also, “to regulate, order” and “to restrain one’s self, forbear, abstain”.  In our prayer I think we have the deponent with active meaning, something like a middle voice.

WORDY LITERAL RENDERING:
We beg You, O Lord, kindly look upon the
devotion of Your people,
with the result that they who by means of abstinence are restraining themselves in due measure in respect to the body
may by means of the fruit of good work be refreshed in respect to the mind.

Macero… soften.  You would think we want to toughen, not soften.  Right?  This is LENT!  This is BATTLE!  We are FASTING!  GET TOUGH!  Right?  Think of the cooking term maceration.  Soften?  Really?

We macerate things by immersing them in some substance in order to break them down.  This is done with meat, for example to tenderize it, to break down the fibers of muscle so that they will not contract under heat and make the meat tough.  We do the same thing by pounding flesh with a spikey hammer.  Maceratio means tenderize.  Think of softening up an entrenched position of the enemy by hammering it with artillery.

Perhaps while we must toughen up in body though discipline, through discipline we can also mellow and tenderize our hearts in respect to any way in which we have hardened them.  Hard hearts don’t admit graces and don’t circulate joy or anything that is good.

What we are driving at here is “mortification of the flesh” and “renewal of the soul”.    Both, at the same time.

I think macero is much more interesting a choice.  Macerantur catches the ear right away, whereas temperantur…  meh… not so much.

NEW ICEL VERSION:
Look kindly, Lord, we pray,
on the devotion of your people,
that those who by self-denial are restrained in body
may by the fruit of good works be renewed in mind
.

More about that tempero.  As surely you do, I immediately think of Horace’s Ode 1, 20:

In Ode 1.20 the poet talks about his countryside villa (his “Sabine Farm”… *sigh*), his wine and a great shout that echoed out over Rome for his patron Maecenas who made a first appearance in public after an illness:

Vile potabis modicis Sabinum
cantharis, Graeca quod ego ipse testa
conditum levi, datus in theatro
cum tibi plausus,

care Maecenas eques, ut paterni
fluminis ripae simul et iocosa
redderet laudes tibi Vaticani
montis imago.

Caecubum et prelo domitam Caleno
tu bibes uvam; mea nec Falernae
temperant vites neque Formiani
pocula colles.

The parts below in parenthesis I added to make this clearer to those who don’t know much about Horace.

(When you, Maecenas, visit me in the country at my farm)
You will quaff from simple drinking cups
the lowly Sabine which I laid down with the
Greek style seal, in the year when the applause
was given to you in the theater,

dear knight Maecenas, so loud that
the Vatican hill together with the banks of
the fatherly river Tiber sent the praises
back to you (so loud they echoed off the Vatican hill back to the Theater of Pompey).

(At your home) you will be drinking Caecuban and the grape
crushed in the Caleniean press; my vines (when you visit my Sabine farm house in the country)
and not Falernian vines nor Formian hills
temper my cups.

It could be that tempero here is a reference to how the ancients used to drink their wine mixed with water.  To drink unmixed merum was a scandal and sign of immoderate … everything.  Mark Anthony was one such, and Cicero sharply pointed it out.  In the Ode, however, I think the very has the force of “mellow” or “season” and the object is the cups.    What is brilliant is that Horace made us think of both at the same time.

A long time ago, one of my Latin profs told me that as I got older I would appreciate Horace more and more.

I suppose with many more seasons behind me now, I have mellowed a little, mixed as I have been in respect to years and tears.

Our prayers this week are giving us different virtues to think about: devotio, moderatio, temperatio. There is a frequent juxtaposition of mens and corpus or caro, rationabilia and corporalia in Lenten prayers.

We are both.  Both must be subject to discipline during Lent.

 

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, WDTPRS |
1 Comment

Daily Rome Shot 1558

WELCOME REGISTRANT:

LindaAnn

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance (massively hiked for this new year of surprises), utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

Today’s Wordle: 3

Germany. They’re really going to fill those pews! The SSPX has to learn.

But don’t worry, DDF says she’s not as important as we thought.

White to move and mate in 4. HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
7 Comments