WDTPRS – 10th Sunday after Pentecost (Vetus Ordo): Mercy and Justice are not opposed

Symbols of Mercy and Justice on the emblem of the Spanish Inquisition

Symbols of Mercy and Justice on the emblem of the Spanish Inquisition

The Collect for the 10th Sunday after Pentecost in the Extraordinary Form survived, sort of survived, to live in the post-Conciliar, reformed Missale Romanum!  You can find it, somewhat wounded, for the 26th Sunday of Ordinary Time in the Ordinary Form Missale Romanum.  I’ll show you the variation, below.

For now, let’s see the Collect as it appears in the 1962 edition.

COLLECT (1962MR)

Deus, qui omnipotentiam tuam parcendo maxime et miserando manifestas: multiplica super nos misericordiam tuam; ut, ad tua promissa currentes, caelestium bonorum facias esse consortes.

In the Novus Ordo version the line “…multiplica super nos misericordiam tuam…” was replaced with “…gratiam tuam super nos indesinenter infunde”.  We will return to see what impact that has on the prayer.

I also looked this prayer up in the ancient Gelasian Sacramentary and found that the version is as it appears in the 1962MR, in not the Novus Ordo.  Sometimes the cutter-snippers of the Consilium restored older readings of ancient prayers that had survived with some changes in the pre-Conciliar Missal.  Not this time.

Let’s now look at some nuts and bolts: vocabulary.

Parco means, “to spare, have mercy, forbear to injure” and by extension, “forgive.”   This verb is used quite frequently in liturgical prayer as, for example, in the responses during the beautiful litanies we sing as Catholics, especially in time of need: “Parce nobis, Domine… Spare us, O Lord!”  During Lent the hauntingly poignant Latin chant informs our penitential spirit: “Parce, Domine… O Lord, spare your people: do not be wrathful with us forever.”

The noun consors comes from the fusion of the preposition for “with” and sors (“lot”), in the sense of a chance or ticket when “casting lots”, destiny, fate).   A consors is someone with whom you share a common destiny.  The densely arranged Lewis & Short Dictionary reveals that consors is “sharing property with one (as brother, sister, relative), living in community of goods, partaking of in common.”  The English word “lot” can be both “fate” and a “parcel of land.”  Having been made in God’s image and likeness, we are to act as God acts: to know, will and love.  Since God spares us and is merciful, then we must be similarly merciful and sparing if we want to be sharers and coheirs in the lot He has prepared for us.

Multiplico, as you might readily guess, means “to multiply, increase, augment”.

Just for kicks, let’s see the obsolete ICEL version we were forced to use for so many dry and uninspiring years.  Remember that a line was changed in the Latin of the Novus Ordo version, as I explained above.

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973):

Father, you show your almighty power, in your mercy and forgiveness. Continue to fill us with your gifts of love. Help us to hurry toward the eternal life you promise and come to share in the joys of your kingdom.

LITERAL TRANSLATION (1962MR)

O God, who manifest Your omnipotence especially by sparing and being merciful, increase Your mercy upon us, [pour Your grace upon us unceasingly, – 2002MRso that You may make those who are rushing to the things You have promised to be partakers of heavenly benefits.

That “ut, ad tua promissa currentes, caelestium bonorum facias esse consortes” means “so that You may make us, (who are) rushing to the things You have promised, to be partakers of heavenly benefits.”  There is a nos in the first part, if not the second.

One of the ways God manifests His almighty nature is by being forgiving and sparing.

God is the creator and ruler, guide and governor of all that is seen and unseen, who keeps everything in existence by an act of His will, and reveals His omnipotence especially (maxime in our Collect) by means of mercy.

By violating God’s will our first parents (the entire human race – which consisted of only two people at the time) opened up an infinite gulf between us and God.  Since the gulf was immeasurable, only an omnipotent God could bridge that gap and repair it.  God did not repair the breach because of justice.  He did so because He loves us and is merciful.

People often slip into the trap of associating justice with manifestations of power.  In this Collect, however, we affirm the other side of power’s coin.  The miracles worked by Jesus in the Gospels, loving gestures to suffering individuals, were acts of mercy often connected to forgiveness of sins.

The affirmation of divine mercy, however, does not diminish God’s justice.  Mercy does not mean turning a blind eye to justice, for that would be tantamount to betraying truth and charity.  Nevertheless, if justice must be upheld because God is Truth, so too must mercy be exercised because God is Love.

For God, balancing justice and mercy is simplicity itself, since He is perfectly simple.  Knowing all things which ever were, are or will be as well as the complexities of each act’s impact and every other throughout history God has no conflicts in the application of merciful justice or just mercy.  He knows who we are, what we need and deserve far better than we do.  Furthermore, in our regard, God acts with perfect love.

For man, especially in times of trial, the simultaneous exercise of mercy and justice is very difficult indeed.  Because of the wounds to our will and intellect, our struggle with passions, it is hard for us at times to see what is good and right and true or rein in our emotions even when we do discern things properly.  We often oscillate between being first just and then merciful. Bringing the two streams of mercy and justice together is a tremendous challenge.  We tend to favor our self-interest, and often balk at what is truly the good for others.

When we encounter a person who can balance justice and mercy together, we are usually impressed by him.  We hold him up as an example of wisdom because he acts more perfectly, more habitually, according to God’s image and likeness.  We are moved by his example because deep inside we know how we ought to be conforming to God’s image in us.  Their example teaches us that it is possible to live according to God’s plan.  The lives of the saints are examples of this.

One way in which we act in harmony with God’s image in us, behaving as the “coheirs” Christ made us to be, authentic Christian consortes, is when we act with compassion.

In biblical terms compassion (Hebrew racham) is often interchangeable with mercy.  The Latin word compassio (from cum,“with” + patior, “to suffer/endure”) means to “suffer with” someone.  Our souls are stirred when we witness suffering and then compassion.  They reveal in a mysterious way who we are as human beings and how we ought to act.  In a now famous passage from the Council’s Gaudium et spes, we are taught that Christ came into the world to reveal man more fully to himself (GS 22).  Christ did this in His every word and deed during His earthly life.  His supreme moment of revelation about who we are was His Passion and death on the Cross.

When we imitate His Passion, in sacrificial love, in genuine “with suffering”, we act as we were made by God to act.   In concrete acts of compassion we, in our own turn, also reveal man more fully to himself!  In our own way we show God’s image to our neighbor and he is moved.  We cannot not be moved unless we are stony and cold and dead.

Pope John Paul II wrote that

“Man cannot live without love […] his life is senseless, if love is not revealed to him, if he does not encounter love, if he does not experience it and make it his own.” (Redemptor hominis 10).

We must experience love, both in giving and receiving. 

When the Enemy planted in the minds of Adam and Eve the doubt that God really loved them, when the certitude of love given and received died, we all died.

The Second Adam offers to bring us back into the certitude of God’s love, through mercy and suffering not only with us, but for us.

Love, given and received, brings us back to life.

Posted in WDTPRS |
Leave a comment

WDTPRS – 18th Ordinary (Novus Ordo) Sunday: cold reality

When the priest, alter Christus, says our prayers during Holy Mass, Christ, Head of the Body, speaks.

His words have power to form us.

Formed according to the mind of the Church, we Catholics then go out from Mass to shape our world around us.

It is the work of Christ’s Body to bring the content of these prayers (Christ Himself!) to every corner and nook we influence.

Holy Church shapes us and we shape the world around us. We then bring gifts – the very best we can conceive – back to Holy Church who makes them her own.  This is dynamic exchange is called inculturation.  However, in this simultaneous two-way exchange, what God offers to the world through Holy Church must always have logical priority over what the world offers back.  This is authentic inculturation!

The Collect for the Novus Ordo’s 18th Ordinary Sunday was not in any previous edition of the Missale Romanum.  The ancient Veronese Sacramentary has a close cousin used by our ancestorsOur modern version simplified the grammar.  I found similar vocabulary in the works of Cicero (+ BC 43 – Ep. ad fam. 2.6.4), in the writings of St Ambrose of Milan (+397 – Hexameron, Day 1.2.7), and in the sermons of St Augustine (+430 – s. 293d, 5).   The Church and culture have been deeply interwoven through the centuries.

Here’s the Collect:

Adesto, Domine, famulis tuis, et perpetuam benignitatem largire poscentibus, ut his, qui te auctorem et gubernatorem gloriantur habere, et grata restaures, et restaurata conserves.

Adesto is the “future” imperative of the verb adsum, “to be present”, in both the physical and the moral sense.  By logical extension, adsum means, “to be present with one’s aid.”  It can also mean, “to be present in mind, with attention” and “to be fearless.”  “Adsum!” is the famous word in the rite of ordination to Holy Orders.  Men are officially “called” by name to Holy Orders (vocatio).  One by one they respond, “Adsum! …  I am present!”

Men may have inklings or personal convictions that they are called by God to the priesthood, but this “calling” during ordination is the Church’s affirmation of the vocation.

At this time of year some of our Collects use similar vocabulary, including slightly unusual words which spark our attention.  Last week we saw dux (“leader, guide, commander”) and rector (“ruler, leader, governor; helmsman”).  This week we have the similar term gubernator, “a steersman, pilot” or “a ruler, governor”.   During Ordinary Time there are groupings of Collects linked by vocabulary, theme, or images, (e.g., military, agricultural, judicial).

The Collects in the Novus Ordo are usually either derived from prayers in ancient sacramentaries or directly from orations in previous editions of the Missale Romanum.   Though they were taken from different times of the year in those sources, they are now grouped together.  This must have been a conscious choice.

LITERAL VERSION:

Be present to Your servants, O Lord, and grant Your unending kindness to those seeking it, so that You may restore favors to those who glory in having You as author and guide, and You may preserve them once restored.

CURRENT ICEL (2011):

Draw near to your servants, O Lord, and answer their prayers with unceasing kindness, that, for those who glory in you as their Creator and guide, you may restore what you have created and keep safe what you have restored.

Take note of the unequal statuses of those to whom the Latin prayer refers.

On the one hand, God is our creator.  He directs our paths.  He is eternal and kind.  He gives gifts.  He can be present to us.

On the other hand, we are servants and needy seekers.  We need God’s favors. We must be grateful, for they are unattainable apart from His kindness.  We do not deserve anything apart from Him. Some of us, moreover, have lost God’s favors.  We are incomplete until He restores them to us. He will not restore them unless we beg Him in His kindness to do so.

Because we are weak, God must preserve His gifts in us once He has given them back.

Our status as lowly servants is the key to everything we receive or regain.

Beware of presumption and ingratitude.  Ingratitude is often considered one of the gravest sins. St. Ignatius described it as “the cause, beginning, and origin of all evils and sins,” highlighting its foundational role in moral failings. Ingratitude manifests when individuals fail to acknowledge or appreciate the blessings they receive, which can lead to a broader disregard for divine grace and human kindness.

Here’s 2 Timothy 3

1 But understand this, that in the last days there will come times of stress. For men will be lovers of self, lovers of money, proud, arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, inhuman, implacable, slanderers, profligates, fierce, haters of good, treacherous, reckless, swollen with conceit, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, holding the form of religion but denying the power of it. Avoid such people. For among them are those who make their way into households and capture weak women, burdened with sins and swayed by various impulses, who will listen to anybody and can never arrive at a knowledge of the truth. As Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses, so these men also oppose the truth, men of corrupt mind and counterfeit faith; but they will not get very far, for their folly will be plain to all, as was that of those two men.

The clear, cold reality of our neediness is today masterfully juxtaposed with the warming, reassuring confidence we find in God’s presence.

O give thanks to the Lord, for he is good,
for his steadfast love endures for ever.

Posted in WDTPRS |
Leave a comment

YOUR URGENT PRAYER REQUESTS

PLEASE use the sharing buttons! Thanks!

In your charity would you please take a moment look at the requests and to pray for the people about whom you read?

Continued from THESE.

Let’s remember all who are ill, who will die soon, who have died recently, who have lost their jobs, who are afraid.

I get many requests by email asking for prayers. Some are heart-achingly grave and urgent.

As long as my blog reaches so many readers in so many places, let’s give each other a hand. We should support each other in works of mercy.

If you have prayer requests, post them below.

You have to be registered here and approved to be able to post.

I received this request:

Hello, Fr. Z-
I wrote to you in June, asking for prayers for my unborn baby. Since then, the baby has shown many signs of improvement. Now, I am asking for your prayers that the doctors will find some healthy lung tissue so that they can take steps to preserve his or her life after birth. We have been praying through the intercession of St. Jude, St. Pio, St. Bernardine of Siena, St. John Paul, and Our Lady Undoer of Knots. We would appreciate your prayers immensely. Thank you!

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA, Urgent Prayer Requests | Tagged
Leave a comment

Daily Rome Shot 1672

A few more photos added at the Mom’s Stuff Page.

HELP! Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

This…

And

Here’s a good one.  White to move.  Figure it out.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Hey Fathers!  How about a clerical Guayabera shirt?  They have all sort of things for laypeople, too.  Check them out.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Leave a comment

Diane Montagna has all of her scalpels out, dear readers. The object of the autopsy is….

Diane Montagna hit one out of the park on her Substack about Card. Roche’s reason and respect defying statements made to The Bitter Pill (aka The Tablet).

More Extraordinary Gaslighting: Cardinal Roche on the Traditional Latin Mass Yet Again
An analysis of the Cardinal’s spurious claims made in the new London Tablet interview

She has all of her scalpels out, dear readers.

I am reminded of Hamlet’s warning to Polonius.

I would post some excerpts, but I am pressed for time. Still, here is how she ends her autopsy.

So yes, there is indeed “plenty of work still to do,” but Arthur Cardinal Roche is not the man to do it. According even to his own words, “I’ve never felt equal to any task I’ve been given.”

Click and go!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Leave a comment

Daily Rome Shot 1671

Welcome registrant:

DavisCountyIowaCatholic

Black to move and mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
9 Comments

THE FIFTH CONJURATION – A Scene in Blank Verse after the Manner of Christopher Marlowe

THE FIFTH CONJURATION
A Scene in Blank Verse after the Manner of Christopher Marlowe

DRAMATIS PERSONAE
SENATOR RON, Chairman of the Hearing
A SENATOR, the principal examiner
ANOTHER SENATOR
DOCTOR FAUCI FAUSTUS, summoned as a witness
FAUSTUS’S LAWYER, a contentious advocate
A CLERK, SERGEANT-AT-ARMS, REPORTERS, and SPECTATORS

The chamber of the United States Senate. Cameras glare upon the witness table. Enter DOCTOR FAUSTUS and his LAWYER. While the LAWYER speaks with clerks, FAUSTUS remains alone.


FAUSTUS

Was this the end for which I searched the spheres,
And questioned spirits in the midnight air?
I once commanded Mephistophilis
To cross the seas and rifle every court,
Yet now I sit beneath electric suns,
While glassy eyes transmit my countenance
To every tavern, kitchen, shop, and school.
I have discoursed with emperors and fiends,
Raised Alexander from the hollow grave,
Yet senators, with paper, ink, and spite,
Have forged an engine subtler than all hell:
A question sharpened to accuse the tongue.
They ask of plagues, of masks, of gates made fast,
Of children veiled and travelers turned away,
Of edicts born at midnight and enforced
Before the sun could judge their consequence.
If I say yea, the word condemns my soul;
If nay, ten thousand letters answer me.
O Fifth Amendment, pentacle of law,
More strong than circles drawn with dragon’s blood,
Stand thou between my silence and their wrath.
One line shall be my castle and my creed,
My shield, my sword, my sacramental seal.

Enter SENATOR RON, A SENATOR, and ANOTHER SENATOR. They take their seats.


SENATOR RON

The Committee will come now to order.
We meet to learn what counsels moved the state
When pestilence descended on the land:
Why faces vanished under cloth and thread,
Why schools were closed and commerce put to sleep,
And travelers forbidden sea and sky.

A SENATOR

Doctor, did you advise the travel ban?

LAWYER

Objection! Vague, compound, and prejudiced!
It lacks foundation, date, authority,
The ports, the flights, the statutes, and the facts.
Moreover, “ban” is loaded rhetoric.
We call it prudent spatial separation.

SENATOR RON

Counsel, attorneys may not here object.

LAWYER

I must object to that interpretation.
The Constitution follows where he goes,
And I shall follow with objections too.

SENATOR RON

You shall be silent while the witness speaks.

LAWYER

Objection to the phrase “shall be silent.”
It chills my speech and burdens advocacy.
I further move the Chairman be recused.

SENATOR RON

You have no motion pending in this room.

LAWYER

I must object because you call it none.

A SENATOR

May I proceed, or must we question him?

SENATOR RON

Proceed.

A SENATOR

Doctor, did you advise the travel ban?

LAWYER

Objection! Asked and answered, though unanswered;
Assumes advice, causation, and a ban—

SENATOR RON

Sergeant-at-Arms, remove this advocate.

LAWYER

Objection! Chairman! This is tyranny!
I claim the First, the Fifth, the Sixth, the Ninth,
The Tenth, the Fourteenth, and all amendments
That prudent counsel may discover later!
Unhand me, sir! I strenuously object!

The SERGEANT-AT-ARMS seizes him.


SENATOR RON

Throw him beyond the chamber’s outer doors.
Should he object when once he reaches them,
Conduct him farther down the marble steps.

LAWYER

You cannot silence law! I shall appeal!
Objection to these hands! Objection! Chair—

He is carried out.


SENATOR RON

The record will reflect his swift removal.
Now, Senator, begin thy questions fresh.

A SENATOR

Doctor, did you advise the travel ban?

FAUSTUS

I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A SENATOR

Before that counsel, did you publicly
Declare such bans both useless and unwise?

FAUSTUS

I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A SENATOR

Yet later did you praise the selfsame act
As necessary to preserve our lives?

FAUSTUS
I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A SENATOR

What changed between the evening and the dawn?
Did evidence compel your sudden turn,
Or did some minister revise your truth?

FAUSTUS

I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A SENATOR

These letters bear your name and signature.
One says the common mask will little serve;
Another, written scarcely one month hence,
Commands two masks where one had stood before.
Did evidence produce this multiplication?

FAUSTUS

I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A SENATOR

Was cloth transformed by some experiment,
Or did obedience make the fabric strong?

FAUSTUS

I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

ANOTHER SENATOR

At first the plague was little understood.
Advice must change as knowledge is increased.
The sailor alters course when tempests rise;
The physician changes physic with the case.

A SENATOR

A doctor owns the limits of his art.
Our witness spoke as one whose every word
Had issued from the mouth of certainty.
Dissent became a pestilence itself,
And honest doubt was branded as disease.
Did you request that private companies
Suppress physicians who opposed your claims?

FAUSTUS

I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A SENATOR

Did you advise the lords of social speech
To strike their words and names from public sight?

FAUSTUS

I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A SENATOR

Did you call settled what was yet untried?

FAUSTUS

I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A SENATOR

This paper bears your office and your hand.
It recommends that children two years old
Be masked within the nursery and school.
What trial proved this burden did them good?

FAUSTUS

I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A SENATOR
Were children counted in your measured cost,
Or were they counters in a statesman’s game?

FAUSTUS
I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A murmur rises from the spectators.

SENATOR RON
The visitors will keep their judgment still.

A SENATOR
When churches closed their ancient doors, while shops
Received the crowds and kept their business free,
Did science draw distinctions in that rule?

FAUSTUS
I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A SENATOR
Did prayer infect more swiftly than the mart?

FAUSTUS
I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A SENATOR
Why sat the dying friendless in their rooms,
While men who framed the rule themselves convened?

FAUSTUS
I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

ANOTHER SENATOR
The witness did not govern every state.
You lay a nation’s grief upon one man.

A SENATOR
One man became the nation’s oracle.
His face appeared at morning, noon, and night;
His slightest gesture moved a thousand schools.
He cannot now retreat into the crowd
Whose every motion waited on his breath.
Did you approve the mandates laid on work,
By which a man might lose his livelihood
Unless he underwent the ordered cure?

FAUSTUS
I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A SENATOR
Did you foresee the nurses cast away,
Though they had served among the sick for months?

FAUSTUS
I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A SENATOR
What power did the emergency confer
That ordinary law could never grant?
Could fear suspend the citizen’s own flesh
And make his body property of state?

FAUSTUS
I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A SENATOR
At what fixed hour did this great power end?

FAUSTUS
I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

The lights flicker. Thunder is heard.

ANOTHER SENATOR
The morning sky was clear.

A SENATOR
Perhaps the doctor’s former masters come
To claim the portion promised in his bond.

SENATOR RON
Confine yourself to matters of the state.

A SENATOR
Indeed, the difference narrows by the hour.
Doctor, you once declared that questioning
Your judgment questioned science in itself.
Did you believe that science dwelt in you?

FAUSTUS
I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A SENATOR
Did pride infect the counsel that you gave?

FAUSTUS
I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A SENATOR
Did power taste sweeter than the public health?

FAUSTUS
I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A horned shadow appears briefly upon the wall.

ANOTHER SENATOR
What shape was that?

SENATOR RON
A fault within the lamps.

A SENATOR
Doctor, did you knowingly conceal
The facts that would have weakened your decrees?

FAUSTUS
I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A SENATOR
Did you speak falsely to the nation’s face?

FAUSTUS
I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A SENATOR
And do you now repent what you have done?

FAUSTUS
I plead the Fifth, and shall not answer thee.

A long silence.

SENATOR RON
The witness hath invoked his privilege.
The hearing is adjourned.

He strikes the gavel. All depart except SENATOR RON. FAUSTUS pauses at the door, then exits.

SENATOR RON
The Fifth may shield the witness from reply,
Yet privilege is neither crown nor throne.
If lawful questions meet defiant scorn,
This chamber hath another writ at hand.
Let counsel search the record of this day
And weigh contempt of Congress in the scale.

Exit.

FINIS

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
8 Comments

A priest’s prayers for before and after hearing confessions

Some time ago I posted these but they are worth bringing out again into the light.

In old prayer books intended for the use of priests there are glorious little gems.  Here are two prayers in Latin for priests to pray before and after hearing confessions along with my own translations.  I used good ol’ “Thou” and retained something of the flowery style of yesteryear because, after all, there’s really nothing wrong with that at all.

I have used these prayers during my whole priesthood now, over 35 years.  They say it all. You could do a lot worse, Fathers, than to adopt them as your own. They provide a realistic view of the gravity of the office and work of the confessor.  They are a mirror in which we can scrutinize ourselves as confessors. They are at the same time, instructive, sobering and consoling.

Over time, they become old friends.

The Latin, frankly, is richer in content then the translations

ORATIO SACERDOTIS ANTEQUAM CONFESSIONES EXCIPIAT

Da mihi, Dómine, sédium tuárum assistrícem sapiéntiam, ut sciam iudicáre pópulum tuum in iustítia, et páuperes tuos in iudício. Fac me ita tractáre claves regni caelórum, ut nulli apériam, cui claudéndum sit, nulli claudam, cui aperiéndum. Sit inténtio mea pura, zelus meus sincérus, cáritas mea pátiens, labor meus fructuósus. Sit in me lénitas non remíssa, aspéritas non sevéra; páuperem ne despíciam, díviti ne adúler. Fac me ad alliciéndos peccatóres suávem, ad interrogándos prudéntem, ad instruéndos perítum. Tríbue, quaeso, ad retrahéndos a malo sollértiam, ad confirmándos in bono sedulitátem, ad promovéndos ad melióra indústriam: in respónsis maturitátem, in consíliis rectitúdinem, in obscúris lumen, in impléxis sagacitátem, in árduis victóriam: inutílibus collóquiis ne detínear, pravis ne contáminer; álios salvem, me ipsum non perdam. Amen.

PRIEST’S PRAYER BEFORE HEARING CONFESSIONS 

Grant to me, O Lord, that wisdom seated beside Thy throne, that I may know how to judge Thy people with justice, and Thy poor ones with discernment. Make me so to use the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, that I may open the gates to no one upon whom they should be closed, nor close them upon any for whom they should be opened. May my intention be pure, my zeal sincere, my charity patient, my labor fruitful. Let there be in me a gentleness which is not negligent, a severity which is not harsh; let me not look down upon the poor, nor let me fawn upon rich. Make me pleasant for attracting sinners, prudent in questioning them, resourceful in directing them. Grant, I beseech Thee, ingenuity for drawing them back from sin, earnestness in confirming them in good, diligence in urging them to better things. Grant me mature judgment in responses, rectitude in advice, light in obscure matters, wisdom in complications, victory in adversities. Let me not be delayed in useless conversations, neither let me be stained by perversities. Let me save others, and let me not lose myself. Amen.

ORATIONES SACERDOTIS POSTQUAM CONFESSIONES EXCEPERIT

Dómine Iesu Christe, dulcis amátor et sanctificátor animárum, purífica, óbsecro, per infusiónem Sancti Spíritus cor meum ab omni affectióne et cogitatióne vitiósa, et quidquid a me in meo múnere sive per neglegéntiam, sive per ignorántiam peccátum est, tua infiníta pietáte et misericórdia supplére dignéris. Comméndo in tuis amabilíssimis vulnéribus omnes ánimas, quas ad paeniténtiam traxísti, et tuo pretiosíssimo Sánguine sanctificásti, ut eas a peccátis ómnibus custódias et in tuo timóre et amóre consérves, in virtútibus in dies magis promóveas, atque ad vitam perdúcas aetérnam: Qui cum Patre et Spíritu Sancto vivis et regnas in saecula saeculórum. Amen.

Dómine Iesu Christe, Fili Dei vivi, súscipe hoc obséquii mei ministérium in amóre illo superdigníssimo, quo beátam Maríam Magdalénam omnésque ad te confugiéntes peccatóres absolvísti, et quidquid in sacraménti huius administratione neglegénter minúsque digne perféci, tu per te supplére et satisfácere dignéris. Omnes et síngulos, qui mihi modo conféssi sunt, comméndo dulcíssimo Cordi tuo rogans, ut eósdem custódias et a recidíva praesérves atque post huius vitae misériam mecum ad gáudia perdúcas aetérna. Amen.

PRIEST’S PRAYERS AFTER HEARING CONFESSIONS

Lord Jesus Christ, sweet lover and sanctifier of souls, I pray Thee, through the infusion of the Holy Spirit, purify my heart from every corrupt feeling or thought and, through Thy infinite compassion and mercy, deign to make good any transgression whatsoever made by me in my service due to my negligence or my ignorance. I commend to Thy most lovable wounds all the souls whom Thou hast drawn to repentance, and whom Thou hast sanctified by Thy Precious Blood, so that Thou mayest preserve them from every sin, keep them in Thy love and in Thy fear, promote more virtues in them each day, and lead them to eternal life. Who livest and reignest with the Father and the Holy Spirit, world without end. Amen.

O Lord Jesus Christ, Son of the living God, accept this ministry of my obedience with that surpassing love with which Thou didst absolve Saint Mary Magdalene and all sinners flying to Thee for refuge, and deign Thyself to supply and satisfy whatsoever in the administration of this Sacrament I performed negligently and less than worthily. I commend to Thy most sweet Heart each and every person who has just now confessed to me, begging that Thou mayest guard them and keep them from backsliding and, after the misery of this life, that thou mayest lead them with me to joys everlasting. Amen.

I did some digging for more about these prayers.   Another title for the first prayer, for before hearing confessions, is Oratio a confessariis recitanda antequam ad sacramentales fidelium confessiones excipiendas assideant.

The earliest securely documented source is a decree of the Sacred Congregation of Indulgences dated 27 March 1854. At the petition of Father Giacomo, or Jacobus, Pignone del Carretto, Superior General of the Theatine Clerics Regular, Pope Pius IX granted an indulgence of one hundred days, once daily, to confessors who recited it devoutly before hearing confessions. The decree prints the prayer in full but does not identify its composer.   The prayer subsequently entered the Raccolta and other priestly manuals. It appears in the 1952 Enchiridion Indulgentiarum as no. 753, under the same designation, with the indulgence then listed as five hundred days and with references to the decrees of 1854 and 1933.

Something that struck me back when I worked on the translation of the first prayer is the opening which it obviously a deliberate scriptural reference. The first words come from Wisdom 9:4:

Da mihi sedium tuarum assistricem sapientiam
Give me Wisdom, who sits beside thy throne.

The following petition,

ut sciam iudicare populum tuum in iustitia, et pauperes tuos in iudicio,

is adapted from Psalm 71:2 in the traditional Vulgate: iudicare populum tuum in iustitia, et pauperes tuos in iudicio. The confessor is thus placed in the position of Solomon, asking for divine wisdom to exercise judgment justly, especially toward the poor and vulnerable.

The next section, concerning the proper use of the claves regni caelorum, applies Christ’s grant of the keys and the power of binding and loosing in Matthew 16:19 to the sacramental tribunal:

Fac me ita tractare claves regni caelorum, ut nulli aperiam, cui claudendum sit, nulli claudam, cui aperiendum.

This asks that the priest neither absolve someone who must presently be refused absolution nor deny absolution to one who is properly disposed.

The remainder is an exceptionally compact description of the confessor’s virtues: purity of intention, sincere zeal, patient charity, firmness without severity, gentleness without laxity, impartiality between rich and poor, prudence in questioning, competence in instruction, maturity in responses, and vigilance against both idle conversation and moral contamination.

Concerning the two prayers for after hearing confessions, the first prayer is derived from Father Joseph Schneider, S.J.’s Manuale sacerdotum published in Cologne in 1861. His preface says he attempted to collect and arrange suitable material ex optimis scriptoribus ecclesiasticis, “from the best ecclesiastical writers.” The concluding petitions offer a theology of sacramental perseverance. The penitent has received pardon, yet must still be guarded from sin, preserved in holy fear and love, advanced daily in virtue, and conducted to eternal life. Absolution is treated as the beginning of renewed Christian life rather than an isolated juridical event. The full doxology, Qui cum Patre et Spiritu Sancto vivis et regnas, gives the oration the form and cadence of a Roman collect.

The second prayer is older, substantially with the same wording from Alexander Scheffler’s Horologium manuale devoti Christiani, published at Ottobeuren in 1766. The two were joined as complementary prayers. The first emphasizes purification of the confessor and preservation of the penitents through Christ’s wounds and Blood. The second offers the completed ministry to Christ’s perfect love and commends the penitents to his Sacred Heart. The commendation to Christ’s dulcissimum Cor places the prayer within the affective and reparative spirituality associated with devotion to the Sacred Heart. Such language was common in the 17th and 18th devotional writings. The Heart of Christ is presented as the place in which penitents remain after leaving the confessional. The priest releases them from his immediate care and entrusts them to the continuing custody of Christ.

The Congregation for the Clergy printed them together in the 2011 vademecum The Priest, Minister of Divine Mercy, under the heading Oratio sacerdotis postquam confessiones exceperit.

Moreover, there are also two prayers for the priest for before and after he makes his own confession!

Posted in GO TO CONFESSION, Priests and Priesthood |
Leave a comment

ASK FATHER: What’s your preferred English translation of the Bible?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

What’s your preferred English translation of the Bible? Or do you like different versions for different purposes?

No one translation does it all.  Every time you translate something you lose something.   You have to make a choice between multiple possible meanings.  For example, in Hebrew there is an image for being patient as having a long nose.   What are you going to do with that?  Render it literally?

I generally use the Revised Standard Version, RSV, for my study and reading.   It is pretty much the standard for scholarship.  However, I also supplement the RSV with Greek and Hebrew.  Of course I will also look at the Vulgate… but not the New Vulgate.

I will take a look at the Douay-Reims and, for kicks, the Knox.

The important is to read Scripture.  And you can gain an indulgence for doing so.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
5 Comments

Keep in mind the phrase: quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.

If they think this is going to go away, they are delusional.

Keep in mind the phrase: quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.

Also, yesterday in some commentary on the strange opinions of a bishop, I mentioned the issue of “unity”, which has become a prevailing theme (aka buzz word).

From Infovaticana.  How it starts:

The prefect of the Dicastery for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, Cardinal Arthur Roche, has assured that Pope Leo XIV will not modify the restrictions on the celebration of the traditional Mass established by Traditionis custodes nor restore the regime provided for by Benedict XVI in Summorum Pontificum.

The statements were made in an interview granted to the British weekly The Tablet, [aka The Bitter Pill] in which the English prelate categorically affirmed: «Pope Leo is not going to change Traditionis custodes and is not going to return to Summorum Pontificum.»

This is the first public statement by Roche regarding the Pontiff’s position on one of the liturgical issues that has generated the most debate within the Church in recent years.

Unity as an argument
During the interview, the prefect defended that the question of the traditional liturgy must be understood from the perspective of ecclesial unity. He recalled that the Eucharist is «the sacrament of unity» and maintained that, if the celebration of the Mass becomes a cause of division, «something is seriously wrong». [Something is seriously wrong with his ecclesiology.  Are Romans not in unity with Ukrainians and Maronites?  Apparently we are not in unity with those who use the NeoCat thing or Anglican use.]

Roche also rejected the claims of persecution made by some faithful linked to the traditional liturgy. According to him, when the Pope grants authorizations in accordance with current regulations and those groups continue to claim they are being persecuted, «they cannot answer what the real problem is». [What?!?]

Likewise, he lamented the tone of some criticisms directed against Church authorities and even wondered: «Can one honestly say that one is Catholic when one writes things so full of hatred about people and about the Church?».

Defense of the liturgical reform
The prefect clarified that he does not consider the liturgy prior to the Second Vatican Council to be erroneous, but maintained that the reform promoted after the Council responded to the need to prepare the Church for a renewed missionary task[Does we need again to trot out the statistics of what has gone on since the Council?  Do we need again to point out that the great missionary age of the Church was not carried out with the Novus Ordo?]

[…]

How long, Lord?

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Pò sì jiù, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Drill, The future and our choices, What are they REALLY saying?, You must be joking! | Tagged
19 Comments