15 September: Seven Sorrows of Mary – The “Our Lady of Sorrows Project”

Today, the day after the Feast of the Exaltation of the Cross, is the Feast of Seven Sorrows of the Blessed Virgin Mary.  There is an analogous commemoration on Friday after 1st Passion Sunday.

Some time ago, I wrote a series of reflections on the Seven Sorrows of the Blessed Virgin.  I invite you to have a look.

Our Lady of Sorrows Project

Here are links to the individual posts

1st Sorrow – The Prophecy of Simeon
2nd Sorrow – The Flight into Egypt
3rd Sorrow – The loss of the Child Jesus in Jerusalem
4th Sorrow – Mary meets Jesus on the way to Calvary
5th Sorrow – The Crucifixion of Jesus
6th Sorrow – The Piercing of the Side of Jesus, and His Deposition
7th Sorrow – The Burial of Jesus

At the famous Basilica in Rome, Santo Stefano Rotondo we find this well-known image:

Posted in Classic Posts, Linking Back, Our Solitary Boast | Tagged ,
Leave a comment

WDTPRS- Exaltation of the Cross

Today’s feast commemorates the discovery in AD 325 in Jerusalem by the Emperor Constantine’s mother St Helena of the Holy Cross, as tradition has it, under sweet basil herb bushes.  It is also the anniversary of the Dedication of the Basilica of the Holy Sepulcher built on that site in 335.  A portion of the Cross was placed there.  The Basilica was consecrated on 13 September and, on 14 September the fragment of the Cross was shown to the people so that the clergy and faithful could pray before it.  In 614 invading Persians and King Chosroes absconded with it. They held it until it was recaptured by the Byzantine Emperor Heraclius in 628 and returned to the Basilica.

St. Helena brought a portion of the Cross and other instruments of the Passion back to Rome.  They were deposited, along with soil from the holy ground, at what is now called the Basilica Sessoriana, Santa Croce in Gerusalemme.

COLLECT (1962):

Deus, qui nos hodierna die Exaltationis sanctae Crucis annua solemnitate laetificas: praesta quaesumus; ut cuius mysterium in terra cognovimus, eius redemptionis praemia in caelo mereamur.

LITERAL VERSION:

O God, who on this day gladden us by the yearly solemnity of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross: grant, we beseech You; that in heaven we may merit to attain the rewards of redemption of Him, whose mystery we have known on earth.

The colons and semicolons in the older way of printed liturgical orations are intended to help the priest sing the prayer, rather than to give it greater sense.

The force of the last phrase is “whom we have known on earth in mystery”.  Remember that mysterium is nearly interchangeable with sacramentum.  Notice the parallel set up between in terra… in caelo.  In this life, we can know Christ and what is promised us in heaven only as through a glass, darkly, as St Paul put it.  Our supreme contact with Christ in this life is in the sacramental mysteries, in our sacred liturgical worship and in Holy Communion.  In heaven our knowledge will be more direct, though God will forever remain Mystery, tremendum et fascinans, awesome and alluring.

Here is another version from the beautiful hand missal from Baronius Press:

O God, who this day dost gladden us by the yearly feast of the Exaltation of the Cross: grant, we beseech Thee, that we who on earth acknowledge the Mystery of Redemption wrought upon it, may be worthy to enjoy the rewards of that same Redemption in heaven.

The Baronius Press hand missal, printed in the UK, was released in 2007, the same year that Benedict XVI issued Summorum Pontificum – the “Emancipation Proclamation” which greatly freed up the use of the 1962 Missale RomanumSummorum, with its juridical solutions, is one of the most important accomplishments of Benedict’s too short pontificate.  Now, however, the emancipation of faithful Catholics with Summorum has been cruelly undermined with Traditionis custodes, Francis’ Plessy v. Ferguson to Benedict’s Proclamation.

Let is now move to the Novus Ordo edition of the Missale Romanum.

COLLECT (2002):

Deus, qui Unigenitum tuum crucem subire voluisti,  ut salvum faceret genus humanum, praesta, quaesumus, ut, cuius mysterium in terra cognovimus, eius redemptionis praemia in caelo consequi mereamur.

This was pieced together from phrases from Collects of Palm Sunday and of Wednesday in Holy Week as well as today’s feast in the pre-Conciliar Missal, as we just saw above.

LITERAL ATTEMPT:

O God, who desired that Your Only-begotten undergo the Cross so that He would make the human race free, grant, we beseech You, that we merit to attain in heaven the rewards of redemption of Him, whose mystery we have known on earth.

OBSOLETE  ICEL (1973):

God our Father, in obedience to you your only Son accepted death on the cross for the salvation of mankind. We acknowledge the mystery of the cross on earth. May we receive the gift of redemption in heaven.

Not content to chop the Latin into two sentences, the translators opted for three.

CURRENT ICEL (2011):

O God, who willed that your Only Begotten Son should under the Cross to save the human race, grant, we pray, that we, who have known his mystery on earth, may merit the grace of his redemption in heaven.

Today, the aromatic herb basil (Ocimum basilicum which, comes from Greek basileos, “king”) is blessed by our Eastern brothers and sisters and placed in abundance around their Crosses.

I suggest having pasta and basil pesto tonight with a crisp, cold white live a Sauvignon Blanc or a Sancerre.  With friends and loved ones it would be a fine way to observe the feast day.

NB: By “basil” pesto, I don’t mean made from Basil Emeritus, though he could be invited.

Since there were two “Popes” in the Vatican, why not have two hamsters, Basil and… meet… Ming.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

Sunday Sermon Notes… ON STEROIDS. Wherein Fr. Z posts a must listen sermon from his old friend Fr. A

In the swampy Hell Hole that was St. Paul Seminary in the 1980s Fr. Z and Fr. Robert Altier were classified as the Alpha and Omega. He endured persecution … to his present point, not a little from cowardly bishops. I endured my persecution…. …. ….

Whereas I was hammered in subsequent years because of what I wrote (mostly), Fr. A got hammered by what he preached in the pulpit (mostly).

If they aren’t shooting at you, you aren’t over the target. (Which sort of makes some particular bishops into the enemy, but I digress.)

Here is Fr. Altier’s sermon for this 16th Sunday after Pentecost at St. Augustine’s in S. St. Paul (where I was supposed to go before the powers that be pulled a fast on and at the last minute sent me to a blankity blank blank pastor who had orders to tear me down).

Some day I may write my memoirs. Until then, listen to this. I think you will want to share it.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged
7 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes – 16th Sunday after Pentecost (N.O.: 24th Ordinary)

My Mass intention today is for my benefactors, those of you who donate regularly, ad hoc, or send things.

Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all. Share the good stuff.

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at your Mass of obligation for this 16th Sunday after Pentecost in the Vetus Ordo (24th Ordinary Sunday in the Novus Ordo)?

Tell us about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass.

Any local changes or (hopefully good) news?

A taste of what I offered at 1 Peter 5 this week.

[…]

Garrigou-Lagrange gives the proud soul strong medicine:

“The remedy for pride is to tell ourselves that of ourselves we are not, that we have been created out of nothing by the gratuitous love of God. The remedy for pride is also to tell ourselves that there is in us something inferior to nothingness itself: the disorder of sin and its effects” (The Three Ages of the Interior Life).

To examine our consciences is to shine light into the corners where pride hides like vermin behind garage clutter or rotting food at the back of the refrigerator. Pride reeks, but the devil sprays the air-fresheners of distraction, comparison, indignation, and self-justification. Confession brings the cleansing that pride fiercely resists.

[…]

 

Posted in Sermons | Tagged
4 Comments

They are moving fast.

At LifeSite there is a piece about a conference on “pastoral ministry” for an particular alphabet group and some 10 Italian bishops attended.  It was held, surprise surprise, at the General Curia of the Jesuits.  Where else?

Excerpt (my emphases and comments):

Francesco Savino, bishop of Cassano allo Jonio and vice- resident of the Italian Bishops’ Conference for Southern Italy, called the Jubilee with “LGBT Catholics” an “epiphanic experience,” stating “I have been converted” and explaining that priests and theologians must be reshaped by real people and their stories.

Savino highlighted his accompaniment of “Laura,” a transgender-identifying man, saying his story changed his outlook, and he urged support for priests with same-sex attraction so they do not live their ministry in fear or judgment.

The theological framework for the meeting included the report of Group No. 9 of the Synod, which examined “emerging doctrinal, pastoral, and ethical questions.” [in other words “things which moral theology has already taught are sins and sacramental theology taught are impossible are now ’emerging questions’] According to that report, “sin, at its root, does not consist in the (same-sex) couple relationship” but in “a lack of faith in a God who desires our fulfillment.” Theologian Father Luca Lunardon also discussed what he called a necessary “relational conversion” of the entire “People of God,” echoing what Synodal Groups No. 6 and 7 published in their reports. [It looks like word salad, but it isn’t.]

Referring to the synodal “principle of pastorality,” [“pastorality”?!?  Probably worse in Italian “pastoralità”] Lunardon said [NB] that people’s experiences can prompt the Church to reconsider its pastoral practices and the way it formulates moral norms. [And there it is.]

They are moving fast.

Posted in Pò sì jiù, Sin That Cries To Heaven, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, What are they REALLY saying? |
13 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1071 – 343 years ago today

Happy Feast of the Holy Name of Mary!

These were/are in the pews of my home parish in St. Paul. Nice to see.

Bring back hats.

Black to move and mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
11 Comments

11 September – The years which have passed do not lessen the need of the victims for our prayers…

Today for my live Mass, I said:

Today, on this anniversary, we offer the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass for those who died in the attacks of 11 September 2001: those in the towers, at the Pentagon, aboard the aircraft, and those who entered danger to rescue strangers.

In a poem Thomas Merton imagined New York City after some catastrophe:

How are they down, how have they fallen down
Those great strong towers of ice and steel,
And melted by what terror and what miracle?
What fires and lights tore down,
With the white anger of their sudden accusation,
Those towers of silver and of steel?

From Figures For An Apocalypse, VI – In the Ruins of New York (1947) by Thomas Merton”

“How are they down, how have they fallen down / Those great strong towers of ice and steel.”

Holy Mother Church brings us beyond terror, and ruin, and nightmarish memories. She brings us to the altar, where the Sacrifice of Calvary is made present and offered for the dead.

In the anniversary Requiem Mass we pray:

“O God, Lord of mercies, grant to the souls of Thy servants, whose anniversary we commemorate, a place of refreshment, the blessedness of rest, and the brightness of light.”

The years which have passed do not lessen the need of the victims for our prayers, nor our duty of charity toward them.

We therefore entrust the victims, known and unknown, to the Precious Blood of Christ. May whatever remains to be purified be cleansed by His mercy. May the sorrow of their loved ones be changed into rest, darkness into light, and the victim’s violent death into everlasting life.

Requiem aeternam dona eis, Domine, et lux perpetua luceat eis. Amen.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
5 Comments

ASK FATHER: How can we, as lay Catholics, pass on the Faith given heterodoxy coming from high places?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Father Z., I see you include soon-to-be Bl. Fulton Sheen’s comments on your sidebar:

Don’t rely on popes, bishops and priests.

“He [Satan] will set up a counter-Church which will be the ape of the Church because, he the devil, is the ape of God. It will have all the notes and characteristics of the Church, but in reverse and emptied of its divine content. It will be a mystical body of the anti-Christ that will in all externals resemble the mystical body of Christ. In desperate need for God, whom he nevertheless refuses to adore, modern man in his loneliness and frustration will hunger more and more for membership in a community that will give him enlargement of purpose, but at the cost of losing himself in some vague collectivity.”
“Who is going to save our Church? Not our bishops, not our priests and religious. It is up to you, the people. You have the minds, the eyes, and the ears to save the Church. Your mission is to see that your priests act like priests, your bishops act like bishops.”

– Fulton Sheen

That makes me think of Galations 1:8-9:

8 But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to that which we preached to you, let him be accursed. 9 As we have said before, so now I say again, If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to that which you received, let him be accursed.

My question is… How can we, as lay Catholics with the responsibility to pass on the true faith to our children and grandchildren, and others, properly apply that admonishment, given the evident heterodoxy coming from high places in the Church?

*sigh*

You are right to connect Sheen’s warning with Galatians 1:8–9.

St. Paul places even himself beneath the Gospel he received and preached. An assertion about the Faith does not become true because a particular ecclesiastic teaches it. He is bound to teach what is true and has been entrusted to the Church.  Similarly, something doesn’t become true because a change is made to the Catechism of the Catholic Church.  You see the proper foundations and arguments in the footnotes which preceded the formation of the CCC: no support, no authority… gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.

St. Paul’s words do not make every Catholic his own pope, measuring doctrine by personal judgment, or by the increasingly repeated “lived experience”. The standard is the apostolic Faith handed down in Scripture and Tradition and authoritatively taught by the Church through the centuries (cf. Vincent of Lérins).

When something troubling comes from “high places,” first determine exactly a) what was said, b) in what context, and c) with what authority.

A papal interview, an ambiguous remark, a curial document, a disciplinary decision, and a solemn definition do not have equal magisterial weight.

Confusion, imprudence, ambiguity, and material error must also be distinguished from formal and persistent denial of revealed truth.

The faithful have both rights and duties.

Can. 212 §3 recognizes their right, and sometimes their duty, to make concerns known to their pastors, while preserving reverence and regard for the common good. Parents have a grave obligation to educate their children in the Faith. This requires knowledge of Scripture, the Catechism, and the perennial teaching of the Church rather than dependence upon headlines, edited clips, or social-media personalities.

Catholics should interpret statements as favorably as the words reasonably permit, without pretending that genuinely erroneous or confusing language is sound. Novel claims should be compared with what the Church has consistently taught. Respectful questions, petitions, and corrections can be acts of charity toward pastors and those who might be misled.

Alas, also true is the adage, “Quidquid recipitur ad modum recipientis recipitur … Whatever is received is received according to the mode of the one receiving it.”

Meanwhile, legitimate authority must still be recognized. A bad exercise of authority does not abolish authority. St. Paul “opposed [Peter] to his face” at Antioch when Peter’s conduct endangered the faithful, yet Paul neither denied Peter’s office nor established a rival Church.

Jesus Himself warned against confusing legitimate authority with the personal holiness (and by extension wisdom) of those who exercise it. Of the scribes and Pharisees He said: “The scribes and the Pharisees have sat on the chair of Moses. All things therefore whatsoever they shall say to you, observe and do: but according to their works do ye not” (Matthew 23:2–3). Their hypocrisy did not erase the authority associated with Moses’ seat, although it exposed them to severe judgment. Catholics likewise distinguish an ecclesiastical office from the faults of its holder.

Authority deserves obedience within its proper limits, while corrupt conduct and teaching contrary to the received Faith must never be imitated.

Children should therefore be taught neither clericalism (which treats every utterance of a churchman as infallible), nor ecclesiastical anarchism (which obeys only when authority confirms private conclusions).

The sensus fidei belongs to believers – TA DA! – living within the Church, receiving her sacraments, adhering to her perennial teaching, and cultivating humility, prayer, and moral conversion.  To have the “sense of the faithful” you have to first be faithful.

Lay Catholics should know the Faith, hand it on faithfully, ask hard questions when necessary, and refuse assent to propositions demonstrably contrary to revelation.

They must do so without rash judgment.

Sheen’s exhortation should be understood in that light.

The laity help “save the Church” by becoming saints, forming strong Catholic families, supporting faithful priests, insisting respectfully upon sound doctrine and reverent worship, and refusing to cooperate in the corruption of the Faith.

Ultimately, Christ alone can His Church.

Our task is to remain faithful instruments in His hands, especially when those charged with strengthening their brethren leave them confused.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, ASK FATHER Question Box, Hard-Identity Catholicism, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged
9 Comments

WDTPRS – 16th Sunday after Pentecost: Grace before us, grace behind us

This dense Collect for the 16th Sunday after Pentecost survived the scissors and paste-pots of the Consilium during the 1960s and lived on in the post-Conciliar Missale Romanum as the 28th Sunday of Ordinary Time.

This prayer, used for centuries, is found in the Hadrianum (No. 966), the form of the Gregorian Sacramentary sent by Pope Hadrian I to Charlemagne near the end of the 8th c.

COLLECT (1962MR):

Tua nos, quaesumus, Domine,
gratia semper et praeveniat et sequatur,
ac bonis operibus iugiter praestet esse intentos
.

Elegance.

This is a lovely prayer to sing. Latin’s flexibility, made possible by the inflection of the word endings, allows for amazing possibilities of word order. Latin permits rich variations in rhythm and conceptual nuances. For example, the wide separation of tua from gratia in the first line is a good example of the figure of speech called hyperbaton: unusual word order to produce a dramatic effect. It helps the prayer’s rhythm and emphasizes tua gratia. The use of conjunctions et and ac is very effective, as we shall see below.

The juxtaposition of praeveniat with sequatur reminds me of a prayer I used to hear at my home parish, greatly missed. The Tuesday night devotions there, which featured the Novena of Our Mother of Perpetual Help by St. Alphonsus Liguori (+1787), always included:

“May the Lord Jesus Christ be with you that He may defend you, within you that He may sustain you, before you that He may lead you, behind you that He may protect you, above you that He may bless you. In the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.”

Let’s drill into vocabulary.

The adjective intentus means “stretched out,” “strained toward,” or “directed toward something.” Applied to the mind, it describes someone attentive, earnest, or intent upon a task. The action-packed Lewis & Short Dictionary states that intentus is also “to direct one’s thoughts or attention to.”

Looking at a word like this should convince any of you with children that they must study Latin. A firm grip on Latin will give shape to their ability to reason and provide insights into the meaning of our English words. An immense proportion of English vocabulary, especially in theology, law, medicine, and the sciences, comes directly or indirectly from Latin and Greek.

Give your children, and yourselves, this splendid tool.

The Collect uses et…et…ac. The paired et…et binds praeveniat and sequatur into a single movement: grace both precedes and follows us. The final ac then introduces the result toward which that encompassing grace is directed: our persevering attention to good works.  The change from et to ac gives the sentence a rhythmic and conceptual turn toward its culmination.

Let’s nitpick some more.

Our Collect has two adverbs, semper and iugiter. Semper is always “always”. Iugiter, however, means “always” in the sense of “continuously.” A iugum is a “yoke”, like that which yokes animals together. Iugum (English “juger”, a Roman unit for land measuring 28,800 square feet or 240 by 120 feet), is probably so named because it was plowed by yoked oxen. Moreover, Iugum was the name of the constellation Libra, the Latin for “scale, balance”. Ancient scales had a yoke-shaped bar. Thus, libra is also the Roman weight measure for “pound”. Ever wonder why the English abbreviation for plural pounds is “lbs”?

The iugum was the infamous ancient symbol of defeat. The Romans would force the vanquished to pass under a yoke to symbolize that they had been subjugated. Variously, iugum also means a connection between mountains or the beam of a weaver’s loom or even the marriage bond.

Today’s adverb iugiter means “always”, in the continuous sense, because of the concept of yoking things together, bridging them, one after another in an unending chain. We get this same word in the famous prayer written by St. Thomas Aquinas (+1274) used at Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament which is the Collect for Corpus Christi:

“O God, who bequeathed to us a memorial of Thy Passion under a wondrous sacrament, grant, we implore, that we may venerate the sacred mysteries of Thy Body and Blood, in such a way as to sense within us constantly (iugiter) the fruit of Thy redemption.”

LITERAL WDTPRS TRANSLATION:

We beg, O Lord,
that Your grace may always both go before us and follow after,
and continuously grant us to be intent on good works
.

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973):

Lord,
our help and guide,
make your love the foundation of our lives.
May our love for you express itself
in our eagerness to do good for others
.

Yes… I did a double-take too.  It is a nice little prayer for use on a grade school playground.

CURRENT ICEL (2011):

May your grace, O Lord, we pray, at all times go before us and follow after and make us always determined to carry out good works.

Back to happier things: copulative particles!

It is important not to get overly picky about particles or exaggerate their nuances. Still, today these conjunctions could be important. That et…et is a classic “both…and” construction. But our Collect has et…et…ac…. The et…et joins praeveniat and sequatur. That pair of verbs is followed by an ac. The author was providing more than simply a change of pace. While ac is not a very strong conjunction, the variation leads to a logical climax of ideas. 

As you read or, better yet, listen to the prayer being sung, attend to that tua gratia (“your grace”), underscored by means of hyperbaton. First, that “tua gratia” can be an ancient form of honorific address, as used today in some countries for nobility and certain prelates: “Your Grace”. So, in speaking of the gift, we speak of God Himself. Moreover, tua gratia is the subject of all the verbs. We beg God, by His grace, always to be both before us and behind us. We pray for this in order that we may always be attentive to good works. Our good works are bound up in His grace.

Also, we can’t see that word praeveniat in relation to God’s assistance and not think also of prevenient grace, or preceding grace. 

St. Ambrose and then St. Augustine posited, and this was confirmed by the Second Council of Orange (529), that, before we believe, before we answer a calling, God gives us the grace which helps us to believe, helps us to answer.

Prevenient grace aids a preparation of the will to respond.  One way of putting it is that it frees up our free will.   In the case of those who have fallen out of grace through mortal sin, prevenient grace disposes us to turn back to God and to assent freely to God’s call.   In the CCC 2670 we read:

“No one can say ‘Jesus is Lord’ except by the Holy Spirit.” Every time we begin to pray to Jesus it is the Holy Spirit who draws us on the way of prayer by his prevenient grace. Since he teaches us to pray by recalling Christ, how could we not pray to the Spirit too? That is why the Church invites us to call upon the Holy Spirit every day, especially at the beginning and the end of every important action.

We rely on grace so as not to fail in the vocations God entrusts to us.

God gives all of us something to do in this life.

If we attend to our work with devotion He will give us every actual grace we need to accomplish our tasks. He knew us and our vocations from before the creation of the cosmos, and thus will help us to complete our part of His plan, so long as we cooperate. Living and acting in the state of grace, faithfully fulfilling our vocations, we can, through Christ and because of His merits, merit the increase of grace and the eternal life God has promised to His children.

In our prayer we recognize that all good initiatives come from God. When we embrace them and cooperate, it is He who ultimately brings them to completion. He goes before. He follows after. Our good works have merit for heaven only because God inspires them, informs them, and brings them to a good completion. He works through us, His knowing, willing, loving servants. The good deeds are truly ours, of course, and therefore the reward for them is ours. Through Christ’s merits God gives us grace, and by that grace our freely performed good works become truly meritorious.

Today’s Collect stresses how important our good works are for our salvation. They are manifestations of God’s grace, indeed, of God’s presence.

Today’s Epistle supplies an excellent scriptural expansion of the Collect. Ephesians 3:13–21 gives us the interior meaning of this encompassing grace. St. Paul bends his knees before the Father and asks that the faithful be strengthened by the Holy Ghost “in the inward man,” so that Christ may dwell in their hearts through faith. The grace which goes before and follows after also works within. It establishes the soul in charity and enables works whose supernatural measure surpasses our natural strength.
Today’s Gospel, shows Christ healing the man with dropsy and rebuking the struggle for places of honor. Luke 14:1–11 provides the concrete good works toward which grace directs us:

In the Gospel, Christ heals the man with dropsy while the lawyers and Pharisees watch in silence. He then warns those who grasp after the highest places. Grace makes us bonis operibus intentos by drawing us away from self-display and toward the needs of another. The Pharisees are intent upon precedence and accusation. Christ is intent upon healing. Grace reorders both our attention and our ambition.

We pray God will lavish His graces on us. In turn, we should be generous with our good works.

Posted in WDTPRS |
Leave a comment

Daily Rome Shot 1700

Rome’s Church of St. Nicholas of Tolentino.

BONUS SHOT

Rome’s “statue parlanti… talking statues” were ancient sculptures used from the 16th c. century as anonymous public noticeboards. Romans attached satirical verses, complaints, and political attacks to them, allowing the statues to “speak” to each other. The most famous was Pasquino, whose lampoons became known as pasquinate. His companions included Madama Lucrezia (above) Marforio, Abate Luigi, Il Facchino, and Il Babuino. 16th c. Twitter, but smarter.

Okay… it’s late, but this is a stitch.

There is some sanity left.

Remember. It’s not just that they hate the traditional rites. They hate the people who want the traditional rites. It’s the people.

Pride of place….

And…

White to move. Mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
4 Comments