Daily Rome Shot 1646: Restoration and BOGO SALE

BOGO information below!

The work of restoration continues at The Parish™.

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

Welcome registrant:

dcastlen50@hotmail.com

The Benedictine nuns of Gower Abbey in Missouri are having a BOGO sale

BOGO OVERSTOCK SALE! Order our new album and get 50% off a purchase of either of our two albums: “Christ The King at Ephesus” and/or “The Hearts of Jesus, Mary and Joseph at Ephesus”

A new album featuring polyphony and chants in honor of the Apostles, including an ancient Compostela pilgrimage song in honor of St. James, chants from the feasts of St. Peter, and hymns in honor of modern apostles such as St. John Henry Newman’s “Praise To The Holiest”.

Recorded by the Benedictines of Mary in March of 2026.

They’ve posted some samples.   Go check it out.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

White to move and mate in 4.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Leave a comment

ASK FATHER: Priest says the consecration of the chalice over the host

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I cannot believe what happened at the Jubilee Mass to commemorate the consecration of our cathedral this morning

[I’ll post the excerpt below.]

Watch from just before the 37 minute mark, where the Consecration starts.

I didn’t present myself for Holy Communion because I wasn’t sure if he’d be giving me the Body of Christ that had been consecrated at a previous Mass, or an unconsecrated wafer.

Okay… there’s no explicit question here. However, there could be an implicit question: Would what the priest did at the consecration of the Host validly consecrate the Host or did it not.

For those of you who cannot see the video, the priest, who seems to be trying to be careful and stick to the book, picked up the host and promptly said the form for the consecration of the chalice, not the host. NB: The “Benedictine” Arrangement of the altar.

Before, you get worked up, things happen. Priests get distracted. In the way he was saying Mass, there’s little indication that this was malicious or mischievous. He simply blew it.  Poor guy.  I bet he is mortified.

That leads us to the substance of the matter, so to speak.

QUAERITUR:

If a priest says the words of consecration for the chalice over the host, instead of the consecration for host, is the consecration of that host valid?

No. According to the older sacramental manuals, the host would not be validly consecrated if the priest used the chalice form over bread, for example, saying over the host:

Hic est enim calix Sanguinis mei…

instead of:

Hoc est enim Corpus meum.

The reason is that the sacramental form must signify what it effects. For the consecration of bread, the form must signify the conversion of bread into the Body of Christ. St. Thomas gives the principle clearly: “the form for the consecration of the bread ought to signify the actual conversion of the bread into the body of Christ.” The chalice form signifies the conversion of wine into the Blood of Christ, not the conversion of bread into the Body of Christ.

Matter and form must correspond. Bread is apt matter for the consecration of the Body; wine is apt matter for the consecration of the Blood. The form for the chalice does not determine bread to become the Body of Christ. (STh III, q. 78, a. 1) The priest’s intention to consecrate the host cannot supply for a substantially defective form.

The papal Bull De defectibus of Pius V gives the governing principle:

“If the priest were to shorten or change the form of the consecration of the body and blood, so that in the change of wording the words did not mean the same thing, he would not be achieving a valid sacrament. If, on the other hand, he were to add or take away anything which did not change the meaning, the sacrament would be valid, but he would be committing a grave sin” (No. 20).

In this case in the video, “This is the chalice of My Blood” does not signify “This is My Body.”

So the practical conclusion is: the host remains unconsecrated bread. The priest ought to have corrected the defect by pronouncing the proper form of consecration over the host. If he has already gone on the older, rubrical solution is that he must return to the point of the defective consecration and supply the proper form.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged
Leave a comment

From “The Private Diary of Bishop F. Atticus McButterpants” – 26-06-15 – Ordination?

June 15th, 2026

Dear Diary,

Yesterday I accidentally ordained nobody. Or maybe two. Or maybe one. It’s apparently still being discussed by the canonical trolls at the end of the hall who given a question, immediately start whispering and photocopying.

It was supposed to be an ordination to the priesthood. I’ve done it before, of course.  Beautiful. Pictures. People happy. Nice lunch after. Two men.  It all went wrong.

The first warning sign was that the permanent deacon assigned to the cathedral was acting as MC.  The problem was that Fr. Lars the new liturgy director now that Msgr. Tommy’s on the job elsewhere broke his leg playing pickleball.  I told McSwiney at the cathedral last week, “Do not use Deacon Carl.” They used Deacon Carl.  Carl is a nice man but that don’t cut it. Fr. Gilbert said, “He has been preparing for days.” That was supposed to reassure me. Chester prepares for days before he throws up behind my chair.

Everything went well until it didn’t. I was thinking that the choir was not awful, which is already a miracle under McSwiney’s rule.  The candidates came forward. Blah blah blah.  Time for the litaney and prostration. Then deacon Bill, an ordinand – late vocation in his 60’s – starting wobbling. Thin shoulders, hot vestments, his eyes rolled up like window shades and he gently, almost gracefully flowed down to the floor at the time to prostate.  At first, we thought it was rehearsed. But then he didn’t get up.

Carl panicked. Instead of letting things breathe for half a second, Carl flapped his binder at me and hissed, “Continue, Bishop! Forward!” as if we were playing football.  Msgr. Tommy, who was seated off to the side with that look he gets when civilization is ending again, lazered me with his eyes. I looked at Carl. Carl pointed at the book.  So I continued.

That was my mistake.

Poor Bill had been hauled up ono a chair, fanned by three seminarians, one of whom looked like he was about to join him on the marble. The other ordinand remained kneeling there hands folded with an expression like, “I chose priesthood … here?”   Water was brought.  Towels.

Carl was stabbing the binder and the page. Wrong page, I think. Maybe the right page. Who knows. He stabbed and I began the prayer of ordination in my bishop voice ’cause I’ve done this before and I was in charge and I’m the bishop.  Then, from somewhere behind me, in a whisper that somehow filled the entire church, one of the priests – the VG? – said, “You have to lay on hands!”

There are things you never want to hear when you are already inside the ordination prayer.  That’s one of them.  I stopped mid sentence.  You could hear the air conditioning. Actually, you could hear it because it squeals and McSwiney still hasn’t fixed it even though I told him to in March.

I look over at Tommy who had gone very still. That’s worse than when he is angry. Gilbert was making tiny little pointing motions at his own hands and head. Deacon Carl was looking at the book as if it had betrayed him.

I said, quietly, “Now?”  Carl said, “Now.”

So I stepped forward, laid hands on the kneeling man, then walked over to the one on the chair because apparently he was still an ordinand I guess even though at that point he was sort of out of it. I laid hands on him too. I returned to my chair and continued the prayer from the place I had stopped.

There was a growling noise from Tommy.  Never good.

I just wanted to get on with it and leave, get the Mass going and get out of there. That’s when Tommy blocked everything.   He marched up to me and said, “We can’t go forward.  You didn’t ordain them validly.”

“They’re priests now,” I objected. He said, “Are they?”

I hate questions like that.  I knew he was right.   Like a machine gun he explained that I didn’t lay on hands and then I stopped the ordination prayer not just anywhere but in the in the middle of the defined form of the sacrament – even I know that’s bad – and then picked it up later.   Carl stood there blinking like a cow. The diocesan communications girl was crying because the livestream was still running.

One of the canonists joined in, then another, and then one of the seniors.  They always do when there is blood in the water. One said “moral unity.” Another said “substantial interruption.” A third said “conditional ordination”.  Tommy said, “No. Proper ordination. Now. Before we go on.”   I said, “What will people think?!”  Tommy blinked and stared at me for a moment and said, “You can’t let these men act like priests.  Invalid Masses, problems with stipends, the noonch.”  He know how to get my attention.  I said, “Alright, Monsignor Tommy, you tell them.”  I gestured to the congregation.

He did.  He charged like Chester going at a donut straight at the ambo and with that calm voice of his announced something like, for the sake of certainty and for the good of the Church these men will serve, the correct rite of ordination will be carried out immediately.  We ask you to pray with with all your hearts for these men and thank God for the gift of the priesthood. Later half the people said they thought it was beautiful. The other half thought it was part of the rite.

Msgr Tommy sort of elegantly elbowed deacon Carl out of the picture and took over.  He had everything arranged and rest of the things needed down the line doubled checked in about two minutes. Two. I have committees that take two months to decide what color the bathroom signs should be.  He gave the nod.  By this time, poor dcn Bill was doing much better.

This time I laid hands first. Everybody in the sanctuary watched my hands like I was defusing a bomb. Then I prayed the whole prayer uninterrupted. Tommy nodded at me once with a smile and we continued with smooth precision, no Carl or binder in sight. Afterward the new priests thanked TOMMY.  The one who feinted apologized to me with tears in his eyes.

After a little while with blessings and shaking hands and chatting with people we went to Razzo’s, me, Tommy, Gilbert. Not Carl. I ordered the veal with extra mushrooms. Tommy had ossobuco. Gilbert had seafood pasta got sauce on his cuff.

Tommy was quiet at first. Then he said, “You know what happened.”

I said, “Yes, Monsignor. Deacon Carl happened.”

He said, “No. Sloppiness happened.”  I hate it when he is right.

Gilbert tried to help by saying, “At least it was fixed, and then stared into his pasta and didn’t help again.  I told Tommy I’d remove Carl from cathedral ceremonies. “From all ceremonies!” he said. Me, “He is the cathedral’s permanent deacon.” Tommy said, “Then permanently sit him somewhere else.” That made me laugh. I didn’t want to but I did.

Razzo himself came over with limoncello and said he heard we had a big day at the cathedral. I said, “You have no idea.” He said, “Bishop, in this diocese, assume I do.”

When I got home Chester had dragged one of my red slippers into the hall and was sleeping on it. He opened one eye as if to say he doubts about the validity of me.

I am tired. I am irritated. I am also relieved. Tomorrow I have to call the noonch’s office before someone sends them a clip. I will say we acted promptly out of an abundance of caution. That phrase covers a multitude of sins.  Gotta praise Tommy for intervening, which proves that we are after all really on top of things here.

Gotta fix things at the cathedral.  I mean, so long as they didn’t really impact me, it was okay, but this whole thing made me look really bad and was nearly a disaster.

Should I tear these pages out?

Posted in Diary of Bp. McButterpants | Tagged ,
3 Comments

What sets Federated Core apart is its privacy model.

Federated Core Platform is a privacy-first, self-hosted alternative to the dominant cloud productivity suites and SaaS software (“Software as a Service”) — think Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Proton — but one where your organization actually owns and controls its data.  Put bluntly, use those and you think you own the data, but you don’t.  They do.  Now think about what you do with those services.

Built on open-source foundations, Federated Core Platform bundles a full suite of business tools

  • email,
  • calendar,
  • file storage,
  • video conferencing,
  • CRM,
  • VPN,
  • project management,
  • and more

into a single, deployable stack that runs on your own infrastructure or any cloud you choose.

For enterprises wary of handing sensitive data to hyperscalers (i.e., massive cloud service providers with vast global data centers), it offers the functionality of modern SaaS without giving them surveillance.

What sets Federated Core apart is its privacy model.

Using Federated Core, organizations can interoperate with one another while keeping their data private within their own environments.

This makes Federated Core particularly compelling for industries with strict compliance requirements where data residency and auditability aren’t optional such as

  • non-profits,
  • healthcare,
  • legal,
  • finance,
  • government,
  • DIOCESES,
  • PARISHES,
  • RELIGIOUS ORDERS.

Instead of accepting a vendor’s opaque terms of service (i.e., the small print, and even the large print), teams get full administrative control, audit logs, and the ability to inspect the code their business runs on.

If you or your company is using SaaS, you are effectively renting your data to someone else (e.g., hyperscalers).

It’s simple: stop renting access to your own company’s data.

Federated Core Platform gives organizations the productivity stack they need without the lock-in, the data harvesting, or the escalating per-seat fees (i.e., the more people you have using the SaaS service, the more they charge you).

For IT and security leaders, it’s a rare chance to consolidate tools, reduce third-party risk, and put data governance back in-house, without asking employees to sacrifice the polished, integrated experience they expect from modern software.

Millions of people use the same applications offered by Federated Core Platform every day.

 

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole, The Drill | Tagged
1 Comment

Daily Rome Shot 1645: Homework

The World’s Best Sacristan™ sent this inscription which tells an interesting story.  To make it easier for you to provide us with your own accurate rendering, here is the transcription.

ANNO DOMINI MDCCLXIII
DIE FESTO S. PHILIPPI NERI XXVI. MAII
IOSEPH ANDERLINI DIOECESIS NOVARIENSIS
CAECVS
PERGENS AD ECCLESIAM S. MARIAE IN VALLICELLA
DVCTVS AB ANDREA ROTINI
DE EIVSDEM S. PHILIPPI MERITIS SIMVL COLLOQVENTES
HOC LOCI
SOLVS BREVI TEMPORIS SPATIO RELICTVS A SOCIO
IN HVIVS PVTEI LABRO SESSVS
PERICVLI NESCIUS IN PROFVNDVM PROLAPSVS EST
MINISTRATO AVTEM QVO SESE PRAECINXIT FVNE
NON SINE MIRACVLO INDE ILLAESVS EMERSIT
MVTATISQVE MADEFACTIS VESTIBVS
AD LIBERATOREM SVVM CVM SOCIO
GRATIAS ACTVRVS ACCESSIT
MARCHIO VINCENTIVS ORIGO MEMORIAE CAVSA POSVIT

It helps to know Latin when getting about in Rome.  It’s everywhere and packs a lot of information.

Welcome registrants:

salver
sam@farr*****.com

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

 

White to move and mate in 5.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
6 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes – 3rd Sunday after Pentecost (N.O.: 11th Ordinary)

Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all. Share the good stuff.

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at your Mass of obligation for this 3rd Sunday after Pentecost in the Vetus Ordo (11th Ordinary Sunday in the Novus Ordo)?

Tell us about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass.

Any local changes or (hopefully good) news?

A taste of what I offered at 1 Peter 5 this week.  I wrote about the 2nd Sunday after Pentecost but related it to the great feasts nearby.

[…]

Sin broke that order. Original Sin did not disorder only the soul. It wounded the entire material order in which man, its head beneath God, had been placed. Hence St. Paul can speak of creation as if it were personal, indeed almost maternal: “the whole creation has been groaning in travail together until now” (Rom 8:22). The ?????? waits, not for annihilation, but for liberation from bondage to decay. It longs for “the revealing of the sons of God,” not what the sons reveal, but the unveiling of what they are in Christ. The old creation and the new creation are not two unrelated universes, one thrown away and another brought in as replacement. They meet in the flesh of the risen Christ. He is the hinge, the crossing point, the place where created nature is taken into indestructible union with uncreated divinity.

[…]

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

YOUR URGENT PRAYER REQUESTS

PLEASE use the sharing buttons! Thanks!

In your charity would you please take a moment look at the requests and to pray for the people about whom you read?

Continued from THESE.

Let’s remember all who are ill, who will die soon, who have died recently, who have lost their jobs, who are afraid.

I get many requests by email asking for prayers. Some are heart-achingly grave and urgent.

As long as my blog reaches so many readers in so many places, let’s give each other a hand. We should support each other in works of mercy.

If you have prayer requests, post them below.

You have to be registered here and approved to be able to post.

I received this request:

Dear Fr. Z,
I am writing to ask you for your prayers for our unborn baby who is experiencing a life-threatening diagnosis. We are praying that God will heal in our baby and allow him or her to be born safely and alive. Thank you for your prayers.

 

Posted in Urgent Prayer Requests | Tagged
5 Comments

“…the young are more to be pitied, since they know not of what they have been deprived.”

I posted this recently, but since today is the Feast of St. Basil of Caesarea (which gives way to the Sunday), here it is again:


Originally Published on: Jun 4, 2026

The evils which afflict us are well known, even if we do not now mention them, for long since have they been re-echoed through the whole world. The teachings of the Fathers are scorned; the apostolic traditions are set at naught; the fabrications of innovators are in force in the churches; these men, moreover, train themselves in rhetorical quibbling and not in theology; the wisdom of the world takes first place to itself, having thrust aside the glory of the Cross. The shepherds are driven away, and in their places are introduced troublesome wolves who tear asunder the flock of Christ. The houses of prayer are bereft of those wont to assemble therein; the solitudes are filled with those who weep. The elders weep, comparing the past with the present; the young are more to be pitied, since they know not of what they have been deprived.

Basil of Caesarea, Letter 90 (tr. Roy J. Deferrari)

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, Patristiblogging, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices |
3 Comments

Leo XIV to priests on the Feast of the Sacred Heart

I agree with Matthew Hazell, below.  It is refreshing not to be insulted and scolded.

Posted in Leo XIV |
4 Comments

Brooklyn 26/6 – Day 4: Southbound and, yup, we did it again

The Roman sunrise was at 5:32.Brooklyn: 5:24.The Roman sunset will be at 20:48Brooklyn: 8:27The Ave Maria there, 21:15.The Ave Maria where I will be… not sure, yet. Maybe around 8:40. But in Brooklyn it will be at 8:57.It is the Feast of St. Pope Leo III.It is also a MEAT FRIDAY, because it is the Feast of Most Sacred Heart of Jesus. Can. 1251 Abstinence from meat, or from some other food as determined by the Episcopal Conference, is to be observed on all Fridays, unless a solemnity should fall on a Friday. In the Church’s universal liturgical calendar, today is a solemnity.Welcome registrants:jsmith Kilo1Mike21 vivdscjA little more about Leo III.  He was Roman cardinal,  unanimously elected pope on the day his predecessor was buried. He lived amid tensions between popes and emperors over their rights and powers. Unlike his predecessor Adrian, Leo recognized Charlemagne as protector of the See of Rome, which earned him enemies among the Roman nobility. A mob attacked him, an cut out his eyes and tongue. He survived, was imprisoned, and was falsely deposed. His eyes and tongue were miraculously restored, and he escaped to Charlemagne, who escorted him back to Rome and put his enemies on trial. At Christmas Mass in 800, Leo crowned Charlemagne Holy Roman Emperor. As pope, Leo improved Roman churches and fostered a more unified Christian Europe through cooperation between Church and secular rulers.He shares a tomb with Sts. Leo II and Leo IV, just across from that of Leo I, “the Great”.  It’s a bit of a Leo den over in that corner of St. Peter’s.What’s better than too much Chinese food?Even more too much Chinese food!Again the xiao long bao.Fish braised with bok choy and ginger scallion.Cumin lamb.Tea smoked duck.And one guy – way over there – wanted some Kung pao ji ding.  It isn’t blurry because it was moving.The Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X (SSPX) has made a video available.   It is quite well done.   I bring it to your attention because, as it seems to me, the SSPX is not widely understood.
YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon
White to move.  Mate in 4.NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

UPDATE

My view for a while.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
6 Comments