Archbp. of Milwaukee reacts to the SSPX consecrations. Fr Z comments.

One bishop after another are issuing letters to their flocks in the wake of the SSPX episcopal consecrations.  Uniformly, they repeat a factual error in the “Explanatory Note” about the faculties of the SSPX to receive sacramental confessions and validly absolve.   In sum: since a Pope gave the faculty, a Pope has to remove it.  Also, the “Explanatory Note” doesn’t have any juridical force.

Error aside, there is something good in this letter for Milwaukee.

Here is the text of Archbp. Grob’s letter.  My emphases and comments.


Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ,

On July 1, 2026, bishops of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) consecrated four priests as bishops without the mandate of the Holy Father and against his expressed will. On July 2, the Holy See declared that the bishops who carried out these consecrations and those who received them committed schismatic acts and incurred automatic excommunication. This is a sorrowful moment for the whole Church, and I share that sorrow with you.

I write to you today because this decision by the Society’s leadership has legitimate consequences for the faithful of this local church, especially for the faithful who have worshipped at St. Pius V Chapel in Mukwonago.

To state those consequences plainly, know first that the Holy See has declared that the clerics of the Society now administer the sacraments illicitly, and, that the confessions they hear and the marriages at which they assist are invalid. [It is hard to imagine that bishops will want to grant delegation for marriages now that this has happened, but, again, this is something that Francis gave, not the Dicastery.  If you accept that Francis was Pope  – some people don’t think he was but I suspect most American bishops do – then we have to have clarity about the issue of valid confessions and marriages.  This next part…] Anyone with questions about a marriage already celebrated, or about any particular situation, is welcome to contact the Chancery or the Metropolitan Tribunal, and they will help you. [This is very good.  This is an invitation to those who may have doubts, offering a route to clarity about the status of their marriage and a path towards regularization.]

Furthermore, to those who have attended the liturgies of the Society of St. Pius X, let me also offer a word of reassurance. The Holy See itself has made clear that this excommunication does not fall upon those who attended these liturgies simply out of love for the sacred liturgy, and who have never rejected the Holy Father or the teaching of the Church. I know that this describes many of you and of the strength of your families, your reverence, and the seriousness with which you pass on the faith to your children. However, knowing the situation as it now stands, such persons must simply resolve not to continue to participate in future SSPX sacramental worship or pastoral ministry[It’s a little more complicated than that.  There are reasons provided for in law by which people might be able to frequent Masses of SSPX chapels.  What is necessary is that people not attend them out of a schismatic motive.]

Furthermore, I would remind the faithful of our local church that the Mass celebrated according to the 1962 Missal, is offered in full communion with the Church here throughout this Archdiocese at multiple locations. I would especially highlight the reverent sacramental care provided at St. Stanislaus Oratory in Milwaukee, where the Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest offers the traditional Latin Mass and sacraments each day.  [Channeling our inner Oliver, please, Archbishop, may we have some more? Note this next part…]

To any priest of the Society who is weighing what these events mean for his priesthood, know that the Holy See has established a path for your reconciliation, and that I will receive any such request with what the Holy See itself has asked of me: through listening and cordial availability, remaining especially mindful of the human and spiritual weight such a decision carries.  [I think this is terrific.  I haven’t yet seen anything like this in the letters of other bishops.  Please, dear readers, if you know of another, please let me know.   The Archbishop has offered an open door, at least for … something.  Would that more bishops were this open.  I hope that that “human and spiritual weight” part means that he knows that these priests will not want to use the Novus Ordo. I am minded of “back in the day” when it was desperately hard for SSPX priests to find a bishop.  I remember several cases, both sad and also joyful.  What I would also like to see – PLEASE GOD – bishops who don’t just say, “okay you can come, I guess”, but perhaps to reach out and invite priests.  And this extends beyond the SSPX.  There are any number of priests who have been cancelled or semi-cancelled, who are perfectly sound but their bishops won’t treat them with decency because they are too “traditional”.  What I would like to hear, and frankly despair of hearing is not “okay, I guess you can come”, but rather, “Please, do come.”  That makes all the difference.]

The Church has labored for decades toward the full reconciliation of the Society, under St. John Paul II, Benedict XVI, Francis, and now Leo XIV. That labor has been gravely harmed by the acts of July 1, but the Church does not stop praying for unity, because Christ Himself prayed for it on the night before He died, that they may all be one (John 17:20-23). [Prayer is great.  However, as in our individual lives, we need concrete deeds as well.  Otherwise, the intention seems a little vaporous.]

I entrust all those affected by this moment to the intercession of Our Lady, Mother of the Church, and I assure you of my prayers,

Yours in Christ,

Most Reverend Jeffrey S. Grob
Archbishop of Milwaukee

Posted in SSPX | Tagged ,
Leave a comment

WDTPRS – 7th Sunday after Pentecost: God can neither deceive nor be deceived

In the traditional Roman calendar this Sunday is the 7th Sunday after Pentecost.

Today’s Collect survived the cutting and pasting experts of the Consilium to live on as the Collect for the 9th Sunday of Ordinary Time.

COLLECT (1962MR):

Deus, cuius providentia in sui dispositione non fallitur
te supplices exoramus,
ut noxia cuncta submoveas,
et omnia nobis profutura concedas
.

Note the use of the trop homoioteleuton (same ending in corresponding elements) in submoveas and concedas.  The last two clauses, cola, both have preposition prefixes and the structure is the same.

Blaise/Chirat (a dictionary of Latin in French) indicates that dispositio is “disposition providentialle”. It has to do God’s plan for salvation. Fallo is an interesting word. It means basically, “to deceive, trick, dupe, cheat, disappoint” and it has as synonyms “decipio, impono, frustror, circumvenio, emungo, fraudo”. Fallo is used to indicate things like simply being mistaken or being deceived. It can apply to making a mistake because something eluded your notice or it was simply unknown. In our Latin conversation it is not uncommon to say nisi fallor, “unless I am mistaken…”. If you look for submoveo you may have to check under summoveo. Find profutura under prosum. Don’t confuse noxia with noxa.

SUPER LITERAL WDTPRS VERSION:

God, whose providence is not circumvented in its plan,
humbly we implore You,
that You clear away every harmful thing
and grant us all things beneficial
.

There is no getting around or circumventing God’s plan.

Why, given who God is and who we are, would we want to try?

But we do, don’t we.

We have to make a choice about which way to go with noxia.  Does it mean “harmful things” that are outside us or that are within us, that is, our own sins, our faults?  Both?

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973 9th Sunday Ordinary Time):

Father, your love never fails. Hear our call. Keep us from danger and provide for all our needs.

ROFL! Quite simply dreadful.  This may be one of the worst I have ever seen.  But we NEVER have to HEAR IT AGAIN.

CURRENT ICEL (2011  9th Sunday Ordinary Time):

O God, whose providence never fails in its design, keep from us, we humbly beseech you, all that might harm us and grant all that works for our good.

We have to make a choice about which way to go with noxia.  Does it mean “harmful things” that are outside us or that are within us, that is, our own sins, our faults?  Both?
God knows who we are and what we need far better than we can ever know ourselves.

The petition of this Collect closely corresponds to the final petitions of the Our Father: et ne nos inducas in tentationem; sed libera nos a malo, “and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil.” The expression noxia cuncta, “all harmful things,” embraces both tentationes, temptations, and mala, evils. This correspondence is entirely fitting, since the Our Father, the most perfect of all prayers, provides the fundamental pattern for the Church’s official prayer.

The opening clause establishes the horizon for everything which follows. Divine providence does not miscalculate. God does not discover unforeseen obstacles, revise His eternal wisdom, or lose control of the field. Dispositio is an arrangement, the structure of a discourse, and also the drawing up of forces for battle. Through the Logos, the Word who is divine reason and perfect discourse, all things were made and ordered. We were called into existence in a time, place, state, and network of duties. The circumstances in which fidelity must bear fruit are encompassed within providence.

Foreseeing all our sins and many faults, all that we say and do is embraced in His eternal plan.

He has disposed all things so as to make glorious things result from the evils for which we alone are responsible.

Sometimes, moreover, it is hard to understand that God actually cares are us.  Given how immeasurably vast God is and how small we are, it is easy for some, mired in earthly distractions, to lapse into sort of deism and imagine a God who created everything and then, like a clock maker, just set the pendulum to swing and stepped away.

There is an old adage that, if you want to know if God is interested in you, just make a plan.

It is good for us each day never to forget to make an Act of Faith, which is a good Trinitarian prayer.

O my God, I firmly believe that Thou art one God in Three Divine Persons, Father, Son and Holy Ghost. I believe that Thy Divine Son became Man, and died for our sins, and that He will come to judge the living and the dead. I believe these and all the truths which the Holy Catholic Church teaches, because Thou hast revealed them, Who canst neither deceive nor be deceived.

 

Posted in WDTPRS |
Leave a comment

Daily Rome Shot 1657 – new life

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

I’m glad that Rorate picked this up. I tried to get it from Le Figaro yesterday, but there is a paywall in place that I couldn’t get around.

This Saturday, July 11th, Notre-Dame de Bellefontaine Abbey officially receives a new monastic community. For Dom Louis-Marie, Abbot of Le Barroux, the decision is above all the fruit of spiritual discernment: “From the beginning, it has been a matter of following the signs of heaven and the signs of the Lord.”

On November 13, 2025, the last Trappist monks departed Notre-Dame de Bellefontaine Abbey, bringing to a close more than two centuries of uninterrupted presence at this monastery in the Mauges region. The future of the site remained uncertain. This Saturday, July 11th, a new chapter opens with the official installation of twelve monks from the Abbey of Sainte-Madeleine du Barroux, who now ensure the continuity of a monastic life nearly a thousand years old.

This arrival is far more than a simple replacement of one community by another. It marks the return of Benedictines to a monastery whose origins reach back to the early twelfth century.

There’s more. This is like a balm for the soul. I have no doubt whatsoever that this foundation from Le Barroux will flourish and, perhaps in its own time, renew monastic life in another worthy and salvageable monastery. You can hear the office chanted by the monks at Le Barroux HERE.

But the TLM must be suppressed in favor of the one “unique” Roman Rite… right?

White to move and mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Leave a comment

Daily Rome Shot 1656 – different stuff

Welcome registrant:

FrGabriel

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, and now also my late mother’s place.  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.  

 

And… an analogy for how smoothly the Church has been running post Vatican II…

And…

And…. QUAERITUR… have you read it?

White to move and mate in 4.

NB: I’ll excommunicate comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Fifty years ago on 10 July 1976, Viktor Korchoi defected from the USSR while he was in Amsterdam. HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

WDTPRS – 15th Ordinary Sunday (N.O.): Too far right or too far left, we wind up in the ditch in the dark

This week, the 15th Ordinary Sunday in the Novus Ordo calendar, we have a good example of the dramatic difference between the old, Obsolete ICEL version we suffered with for decades, and the Latin with the Current ICEL version.

The Collect or Opening Prayer for this 15th Sunday of Ordinary Time in the Novus Ordo is also used in the Vetus Ordo on the 3rd Sunday after Easter.   In the Novus Ordo it is also the Collect for Monday of the 3rd week of Easter season.

Today’s prayer goes back at least to the ancient Gelasian Sacramentary.  My trusty edition of St. Pius V’s 1570 Missale Romanum, and the subsequent 1962MR, shows the insertion of a word – “in viam possint redire iustitiae” – not present in the more ancient Collect in the Gelasian (though it was present in some other ancient sacramentaries).

The Ordinary Form editions of the Missal drop iustitiae.

Stylistically, this is a snappy prayer, with nice alliteration and a powerful rhythm in the last line.

Deus, qui errantibus, ut in viam possint redire,
veritatis tuae lumen ostendis,
da cunctis qui christiana professione censentur,
et illa respuere, quae huic inimica sunt nomini,
et ea quae sunt apta sectari.

It is hard to know what might be the sources influencing this prayer.  There is John 14, which we shall see below. Can we find a trace of the Roman statesman Cassiodorus (+c. 585 – consul in 514 and then Boethius’ successor as magister officiorum under the Ostrogothic King Theodoric)?  Cassiodorus wrote, “Sed potest aliquis et in via peccatorum esse et ad viam iterum redire iustitiae? But can someone be both in the way of sins and also return again to the way of justice?” (cf. Exp. Ps. 13).  Note especially the presence of “iustitiae” in Cassiodorus’ phrase.  Might we infer a touch of Milan’s mighty Bishop Ambrose (+397) or even more probably Augustine of Hippo (+430) who use similar patterns of words?

The thorough Lewis & Short Dictionary informs us that the verb censeo, though quite complicated, is primarily “to estimate, weigh, value, appreciate”.  It is used for, “to be of an opinion” and “to think, consider” something.  There is a special construction with censeo, censeri aliqua re meaning “to be appreciated, distinguished, celebrated for some quality”, “to be known by something.”   This explains the passive form in our Collect with the ablative christiana professione.   Getting this into English requires some fancy footwork.   Censeo here retains a meaning of “be counted among” (think of English “census”).  We can get the right concept in “distinguished” since it can mean both “be counted as” as well as “be celebrated for some quality.”

Christianus, a, um is an adjective with the noun professio. When moving from Latin to English sometimes we need to pull adjectives apart and rephrase them.  We could say “Christian profession”, but what this adjectival construction means here is “profession of Christ.”  We find the same problem in phrases such as oratio dominica, which is literally “the Lordly Prayer”. In English it comes out more smoothly as “the Lord’s Prayer”.

Respuo literally means “to spit out” and thus “reject, repel, refuse”.  The fundamental meaning gives a strong enough image for me to say “strongly reject, repudiate”.  The deponent verb sector indicates “to follow continually or eagerly” in either a good or bad sense.  Sector is used, for example, to describe a group of followers who accompanied ancient philosophers, which is where we get the word “sect”.

The word via needs our attention.  It means, “a way, method, mode, manner, fashion, etc., of doing any thing, course”.   There is a moral content to via as well, “the right way, the true method, mode, or manner”.

That’s a lot of vocabulary.  On the other hand, that’s what the prayer contains words and words have meanings.

VERY LITERAL TRANSLATION:

O God, who show the light of Your truth to the erring
so that they might be able to return unto the way
grant to all who are distinguished by their profession of Christ
that they may both strongly reject those things which are inimical to this name of Christian
and follow eagerly the things which are suited to it.

Now look at this!

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973):

God our Father,
your light of truth
guides us to the way of Christ.
May all who follow him
reject what is contrary to the gospel.

I’m inspired!  Aren’t you?

What were they thinking?!?   No wonder so many Catholics today are so screwed up, after decades of that rubbish.

CURRENT ICEL (2011):

O God, who show the light of your truth
to those who go astray,
so that they may return to the right path,
give all who for the faith they profess
are accounted Christians
the grace to reject whatever is contrary to the name of Christ
and to strive after all that does it honor
.

Some initial associations to my mind.

Ancient philosophers (the word comes from Greek for “lover of wisdom”) would walk about in public in their sandals and draped toga-like robes.  Thinker theologian/philosophers such as Aristotle were called “Peripatetics” from their practice of walking about (Greek peripatein) under covered walkways of the Lyceum in Athens (Greek peripatos) while teaching.  Their disciples would swarm around them, hanging on their words, debating with them, learning how to think and to reason.  They would discuss the deeper questions the human mind and heart inevitably faces and in this they were theologians.

We must be careful not to impose the modern divorce of philosophy and theology on the ancients.

In ancient Christian mosaics Christ is sometimes depicted wearing philosopher’s robes, his hand raised in the ancient teaching gesture.  He is Wisdom incarnate and the perfect Teacher.   He is the one from whom we should learn about God and about ourselves.  After Christ Himself, we also have His Church, who is Mater et Magistra – Mother and Teacher.  Sometimes a small Christ is seated upon His Mother as if she were His teaching chair, or cathedral.  When so depicted, Mary is called Seat of Wisdom.

I am also reminded of the very first lines of the Divine Comedy by the exiled Florentine poet Dante Alighieri (+1321) who was heavily influenced by Aristotle’s Ethics and the Christianized Platonic philosophy mediated through Boethius (+525) and St. Thomas Aquinas (+1274).

The Inferno begins:

Midway in the journey of our life
I came to myself in a dark wood,
for the straight way was lost.
Ah, how hard it is to tell
the nature of that wood, savage, dense, and harsh –
the very thought of it renews my fear!
It is so bitter death is hardly more so.

Dante, the protagonist of his own poem, describes his fictional self.  His poetic persona, in the middle of his life (35 years old), is mired in sin and irrational behavior.  He has strayed from the straight path of the life of reason and is in the “dark wood”.

If you haven’t read the Divine Comedy, Esolen translated it into English and did a great job. You could start with Part 1, Inferno – US HERE – UK HERE – or perhaps with Dorothy Sayer’s fine version – Part 1, Inferno, US HERE – UK HERE

The life of persistent sin is a life without true reason, for human reason when left to itself without the light of grace is crippled.

Dante likens his confused state to death.  He must journey through hell and back.  He then experiences the purification of purgatory in order to come back to the life of virtue and reason.  In the course of the three-part Comedy he finds the proper road back to light and Truth and reason through the intercession of Christ-like figures such as Beatrice and Lucy and then through Christ Himself.

In the Comedy, Dante recovers the use of reason.  His whole person is reintegrated through the light of Truth.

Don’t we often describe people who are ignorant, confused or obtuse as “wandering around in the dark”?  This applies also to persistent sinners.

By their choices and resistance to God’s grace they have lost the light of Truth.  God’s grace makes it possible for us to find our way back into the right path, no matter how far off of it we have strayed in the past.

When we sin, we break our relationship with Christ.

If in laziness we should refuse to know Him better (every day), we lose sight of ourselves and our neighbor.

The Second Vatican Council teaches that Christ came into the world to reveal man more fully to himself (GS 22).

Christ, the incarnate Word, tells us in the person of the Apostle St. Thomas:

“‘Let not your hearts be troubled; believe in God, believe also in me. In my Father’s house are many rooms; if it were not so, would I have told you that I go to prepare a place for you?  And when I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and will take you to myself, that where I am you may be also. And you know the way (via) where I am going.’  Thomas said to him, ‘Lord, we do not know where you are going; how can we know the way (via)?’ Jesus said to him, ‘I am the way (via), and the truth (veritas), and the life; no one comes to the Father, but by me.  If you had known me, you would have known my Father also; henceforth you know him and have seen him…. He who has seen me has seen the Father’” (cf. John 14:1-6 RSV).

We have not only the words and deeds of Christ in Scripture, but God has given us in the Catholic Church herself a secure marked path to follow towards happiness.

We can stray off this sure path either to the right or to the left.  Either way, too far right or too far left, we wind up in the ditch in the dark.

When we have gone off the proper path and have left Christ, the Way, we can return to our senses again and be reconciled with God and neighbor through the sacraments entrusted to the Catholic Church, especially in the Sacrament of Penance and then good reception of Christ in Holy Communion.

We Catholics, who dare publicly to take Christ’s name to ourselves, need to stand up and be counted (censentur) in public and on public issues and even sharply refuse (respuere) whatever is contrary to Christ’s Name.

In what we say and do other people ought to be able to see Christ’s light reflected and focused in the details of our individual vocations.

To be good lenses and reflectors of Christ’s light, we must be clean.  When we know ourselves not to be so, we are obliged as soon as possible to seek cleansing so that we can be saved and be of benefit for the salvation of others.

GO TO CONFESSION!

We must also practice spiritual works of mercy, bringing the light of truth to the ignorant or those who persist in darkness either through their own fault or no fault of their own.

QUAERITUR: When people look at us and listen to us, do they see a black, light-extinguishing hole where a beautiful image of God should be?

 

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, WDTPRS |
Leave a comment

ASK FATHER: Can I be godparent of the child of a Lutheran couple?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

My 2nd cousin who was raised catholic and is now a lutheran (along with his wife) are having a child in a few months. They have asked me to be a godparent of the child. As a catholic am I allowed to be a godparent?

Leaving aside the apostacy of your cousin, ordinarily a Catholic should not serve as the official godparent or baptismal sponsor at the baptism of a Lutheran child.

The Catholic understanding is that a godparent represents the ecclesial community in which the child is baptized and undertakes responsibility for helping form the child in that community’s faith.   Since Lutherans hold erroneous beliefs, etc., we can’t help raise the child in their ecclesial community.  It is an “ecclesial community” and not a “church” because they do not have have valid apostolic succession.

However, a Catholic may participate as a Christian witness to a Lutheran baptism, especially when there is a close family relationship or friendship, provided this is permitted by the Lutheran parish.

The Catholic must avoid making promises that would contradict the Catholic faith.

So, in short, official Lutheran godparent/sponsor: no. Witness or honorary “godparent” in a social sense: permissible, subject to the Lutheran congregation’s rules.

There is broader latitude with Eastern Orthodox baptisms because Catholic and Orthodox Churches recognize a closer sacramental and ecclesial relationship; the Ecumenical Directory expressly permits Catholics to serve as godparents in an Eastern Church under certain conditions.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged
1 Comment

Day 3 & 4 Conference for Priests: St. Paul Center for Biblical Theology

The conference has been great. It is so pleasant to meet up with friends and also to meet young and older priests who have bene reading this blog, some for a very long time.

Mike Aquilina has written some 70 books.

Some of the facilities.  A chapel with the Blessed Sacrament.

Well… not so much this… this shows how many readings there are from Augustine in the Office of Readings compared to others.

Individual Mass chapel.  Others concelebrate.

Some bits of sanity are available.

Food is uniformly good, served buffet style.  There are usually a choice of different types of salad and different types of meat, fish or chicken.

The dining area.

After the conferences there is social time.   I wound up playing some chess.  Others had other games.

Next year… since there will be construction here, there will be fewer available spaces.

Posted in Priests and Priesthood, What Fr. Z is up to |
3 Comments

FOR PRIESTS: Wherein, prompted by this conference, Fr. Z posts something for CONFESSION

I’m at the annual conference for priests held by the St. Paul Center for Biblical Theology. They have these three times a year. I’ve been going for year and wouldn’t miss it. There is great fraternity and the presentations, on a different topic each year, are of the highest quality. This year the focus is on the Psalms. I’ve a lot about the over structure of the Psalms in the last couple of days. The St. Paul Center very much changed my approach to Scripture.

One of the opportunities offered for the priests here is to go to confession. Believe it or not, some priests have a hard time getting to confession regularly for various reasons. Some of them have a lot on their plate and the next parish is a hike. Sometimes there are anonymity questions. This is a good opportunity.

With that in mind, here is something I haven’t posted for a while.  It’s from an old prayerbook for priests which I’ve had since before my ordination.  These old books are dense with wisdom.

Here are two prayers, in Latin and English, for priests, for before and after they make confession their own confession.

I’ve added accent marks.  In the translations I used an archaic style.  The content might seem a little flowery in our age of tweets and dumbed-down prose, but… there’s nothing wrong with that!  There are a couple tricky bits in the Latin, but I believe I’ve found the right solutions.

In this these troubling times, I suspect many priests, discerning the particular need and/or in good discipline, will seek to make their own confessions soon.  I hope these prayers could be of use.

ORATIO ANTE CONFESSIONEM SACRAMENTALEM

Súscipe Confessiónem meam, piísime ac clementíssime Dómine Iesu Christe, única spes salútis ánimae méae, et da mihi, óbsecro, contritiónem cordis, et lácrimas óculis meis, ut dé?eam diébus ac nóctibus omnes neglegéntias meas cum humilitáte et puritáte cordis.  Dómine, Deus meus, súscipe preces meas.  Salvátor mundi, Iesu bone, qui te crucis morti dedísti, ut peccatóres salvos fáceres, réspice me míserum peccatórem invocántem nomen tuum, et noli sic atténdere malum meum, ut obliviscáris bonum tuum; et si commísi unde me damnáre potes, tu non amisísti, unde salváre soles.  Parce ergo mihi, qui es Salvátor meus, et miserére peccatríci ánimae meae.  Solve víncula eius, sana vúlnera.  Emítte ígitur, piíssime Dómine, méritis puríssimae et immaculátae semper Víriginis Genitrícis tuae Maríae, et Sánctorum tuórum, lucem tuam, veritátem tuam in ánimam meam, quae omnes deféctus meos in veritáte mihi osténdat, quos confitéri me opórtet, atque iuvet et dóceat ipsos plene et contríto corde explicáre. Qui vivis et regnas Deus per ómnia saécula saeculórum.  Amen.

Accept my confession, O most merciful and most gentle Lord Jesus Christ, sole hope of the salvation of my soul, and grant to me, Thy priest, I beg, contrition of heart and tears for my eyes, that day and night I might beweep all my failures with humility and purity of heart.  O Lord, my God, accept my prayers.  Savior of the world, good Jesus, who gave Thyself to the death of the Cross so that Thou mightst make sinners to be saved, look upon me, a miserable sinner invoking Thy Name, and heed not my evil in such a way that Thou shouldst forget Thy goodness. And if I have committed that by which Thou canst condemn me, Thou hast not lost that by which Thou art accustomed to save me.  Spare me, therefore, Thou who art my Savior, and be merciful to my sinful soul.  Free its bonds, heal its wounds.  Hence, most merciful Lord, by the merits of Thy Mother, the most pure and immaculate ever-Virgin Mary, whom Thou didst entrust as a Mother especially to priests, and by the merits of Thy Saints, into my soul send forth Thy light, Thy truth which all my defects require, and assist and teach me to unfold them fully and with a contrite heart. Who livest and reignest, God, forever and ever. Amen.

ORATIO POST CONFESSIONEM

Sit tibi, Dómine, óbsecro, méritis beatae semper Vírginis Genetrícis tuae Maríae et ómnium Sanctórum, grata et accépta ista conféssio mea, et quidquid mihi défuit nunc, et de suf?ciéntia contritiónis, de puritáte et integritáte confessiónis, súppleat píetas et misericórdia tua et secúndum illam dignéris me habére plénius et perféctius absolútum in caelo. Qui vivis et regnas cum Deo Patre in unitáte Spíritus Sancti, Deus, per ómnia saécula saeculórum. Amen.

O Lord, I beseech Thee, by the merits of Thy Mother, the ever-Virgin Mary, and of all the saints, let this my confession to have been pleasing and acceptable to Thee, and whatsoever was now lacking in me and in the sufficiency of my contrition, and in the purity and completeness of my confession, may Thy mercy and compassion make whole and, thereafter, deign to hold me fully and perfectly absolved in Heaven.  Who livest and reignest with God the Father in the unity of the Holy Spirit, forever and ever.  Amen.

This post is intended for bishops and priests and perhaps seminarians, for now to ponder.

Mary, Queen of the Clergy.  Pray for your sons.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, GO TO CONFESSION, Priests and Priesthood, WDTPRS |
2 Comments

Day 1 & 2 Conference for Priests: St. Paul Center for Biblical Theology

215 priests from 85 dioceses and 4 countries. Pretty good turn out.

Lots of familiar faces and old acquaintences. It’s great to be here an catch up.

 

John Bergsma is giving us the structure of the Book of Psalms and the trajectory of the five books of Psalms.

Dr. Owens burned about 4000 calories in his presentation on how Augustine reads psalms.  Over all a bit remedial for me after the Augustinianum, but still informative and engaging.

The danger zone.

The other zone… they work in tandem.

Receptions in the evening after Scott Hahn’s presentations.  I brought a chess set and some of the guys are engaging.  Fun.

 

Posted in Priests and Priesthood, SESSIUNCULA, What Fr. Z is up to |
5 Comments

19th Anniversary of Summorum Pontificum – Thoughts on how this might end.

What a day that was. I was still at the “Sabine Farm”, like Horace away from Rome’s summer heat. The days were bright and full of hope. A friend stopped in to share a bottle of “The Widow”. What a day.All this madness will pass one way or another.

Today is the 19th anniversary of the release of Summorum Pontificum, the saintly Pope Benedict XVI’s “emancipation proclamation” for those who desired what they ought to have had all along: freedom to use the Church’s traditional Roman Rite.

That endured – although hampered by those who hate those who love Tradition – until it was shut down, again an act of hatred of those who love Tradition, under the cruel document Traditionis custodes and subsequent incoherent burpings of dyspeptic micromanagement from what is now called the “Dicastery”.

Traditionis custodes is to Summorum Pontificum what Plessy v Ferguson was to the Emancipation Proclamation.  If that trend holds, who shall issue the parallel to Brown v. Board?

They won’t win.  Too much is at stake.  Too many people are now involved with traditional sacred liturgical worship.  Too many people hardly involved in anything are dropping away.  Too much information is available on the internet.

The other day Card. Koch suggested that it was time to rescind TC.

So, it is going to end, someday.  I foresee different possibilities.

First, perhaps Pope Leo will give more than 15 minutes of personal attention to this issue which he, more than likely, knows little about. It wasn’t an issue in S. American, nor among the Augustinians to any extent. It is very complicated and it will take both desire and effort to get up to speed.  Therefore, he would do well to find a few “coaches” who could guide him through the theological questions the SSPX raises and through the canonical realities. Will he? I suspect most of his energy is directly toward things that the UN would be interested in. And “unity”.

Second, people will simply, in larger and larger numbers, ignore the cruelty and will take matters into their own hands without – NBwithout malice or any sense of separation or schism from legitimate authority legitimately exercised.  Home chapels and perhaps even purchased places, plenty of cancelled priests to help, lots of willing and happy hands, ready to build the ark and ready to turn it all back to normal when the storm ends.

Third, the chaos born of ignorance (like the ignorance about the Explanatory Note) will continue. Leo indicated to the French bishops that they should be generous (yeah… right). Meanwhile, in these USA bishops are being anything but generous with a new spate of repressions of the people who desire the ancient forms. Coincidently, they are the sort of Catholics you would think bishops would want to support and foster. It seems that bishops or their mandarins are not able to figure out what the Explanatory Note is and ISN’T, leading to bishops frightening and confusing their flocks.

Forth, do I think that, in the wake of 1July, a new Summorum Pontificum is in the offing? No. Nor will there by another Pontifical Commission.

Fifth, the Lord will return.

Sixth, in lieu of the Lord returning, there may be an extinction level cataclysmic event, such as a massive meteor that strikes the planet.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
33 Comments