Daily Rome Shot 1482 – “A…. ?… for your thoughts.”

My view during the Pontifical Mass in St. Peter’s a while back.

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

Black to move and win.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Meanwhile, the SSPX speaks up about the recent document on Marian titles.

Oh my…,

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
5 Comments

REPORTED: Pope Leo says any bishop who requests dispensation for TLM will have it granted

Interesting development. I hope this is true.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
11 Comments

About the Patrick O’Brian’s Aubrey/Maturin series at The Catholic Thing

I read at The Catholic Thing a piece by Stephen P. White about Patrick O’Brian’s Aubrey/Maturin series. Which it begins, as Preserved Killick would say, with Master and Commander, both not to be and to be confused with the homonymous movie with Russell Crowe which deftly pieces together scenes from later books in the series.

Note: White begins his presentation by writing about J.R.R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings trilogy. The idea being that the writing draws you in and it is long enough to be profound and engrossing. Hence…

[…]

The English novelist Patrick O’Brian was no J.R.R. Tolkien. But in O’Brian’s series of historical novels – 20 in all, plus one unfinished – I have found, if not a rival to Tolkien’s beloved masterpiece, then at least a compliment. O’Brian portrays the careers of Captain Jack Aubrey of the Royal Navy and his friend Stephen Maturin, a physician, naturalist, and intelligence agent, through the Napoleonic Wars.

O’Brian invented no languages or mythologies. His novels are set amongst historical events, sometimes described with slavish accuracy. But in his characters –particularly Aubrey and Maturin – one discovers an astonishing breadth and depth of reflection on human nature.

[…]

The first novel opens with the protagonists as young men, Aubrey a newly promoted “Master and Commander,” and Maturin an impoverished, disaffected would-be revolutionary. Neither is married; both are at the beginnings of their careers (though with very different prospects before them.)

The friendship of Jack and Stephen – an unlikely pair, contrasting in physical appearance, temperament, religion (Stephen is a Catholic), and all interests save a love of music – allows for a fascinating study of human character, but perhaps more so, a study of the effects of time and fortune.  [One might be tempted to compare them to Kirk/Spock.]

As their friendship deepens, each friend has time to notice and reflect on the sort of man his friend is becoming, and to wonder at the slow but seemingly inexorable changes in themselves. Years of physical hardship, danger, love, loss, sadness, and joy work upon the men.

And the reader has twenty volumes (about 15 years in the novels’ time) to grow intimately familiar with each character and to savor every detail of the slow work of time upon the human soul.

It is ultimately this moral realism – the surety that these characters inhabit our world, fictional though they may be and as flawed and sometimes disappointing as they are – that make O’Brian’s stories so engrossing, so true.

O’Brian was not a Catholic, though he lived for many decades in the south of France. His familiarity with Catholicism, and with the Mass especially, decidedly alters his understanding of time. Consider the following passage, in which Maturin attends Mass in Boston during the war of 1812:

[…]

I cannot recommend the O’Brian books warmly enough.

BTW… the whole series is read by Simon Vance. He really hits his stride in the second book in which he has all the voices figured out. Two others tried reading as well, namely Patrick Tull and John Lee. A big “Nope!”, to both.

I looked for Vance’s version on Audible and didn’t find it. Back when, I had to check the CD discs out from the public library. More effort, but worth it if you want audio versions.  One of many examples comes to mind, namely, Vance’s reading of the chase by the Waakzaamheid, a Dutch 74, in the raging seas south of Cape Horn. Pure mesmerizing genius.

NB: But read the book first. Always. Book first, to form your own mind pictures and voices.

How important was that for us who had the privilege of reading The Lord of the Rings unsullied by the movies?  Or any other great books, from Jane Austin to Jack Reacher.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
4 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1481

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

White to move and mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

Roman Rota rules against dioceses, orders publishing ‘credibly accused’ clergy lists

I don’t want to reproduce much here so, regretfully, I’ll send you over to The Pillar for more.

  • The Roman Rota, the Church’s highest ordinary court, ruled in favor of an American priest who sued his religious order over being included on a “credibly accused” list of clergy.
  • The legal basis cited is canon 220 of the Code of Canon Law, which protects the good reputation of persons against “illegitimate harm.”
  • According to the Italian daily La Repubblica, the case was heard on June 26 of this year, though the parties were unnamed.
  • The article states that various Vatican departments have for years objected to the practice of publishing “credibly accused” lists without adequate canonical or civil process, especially if deceased persons are involved.
  • Although the Rota’s decision would not automatically bind all U.S. dioceses and religious orders, it might spark similar defamation suits by priests whose names appear on such lists, thereby putting pressure on U.S. bishops and religious superiors to reconcile civil-law guidance with Roman canonical norms.
Posted in 1983 CIC can. 915 | Tagged
1 Comment

Daily Rome Shot 1480

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance (massively hiked for this new year of surprises), utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

Welcome Registrant:

lbarry

This, my friends, is what the internet is for.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

This too…

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Mate in 4. It’s black’s move.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
9 Comments

For the Bishop of Charlotte

Just a moment of your time, Your Excellency…

75% of Charlotte Seminarians Come from Parishes with Altar Rails

This weekend the faithful of Charlotte have learned that as of the 1st Sunday of Advent November 30, 2025, Bishop Michael Martin has ordered that altar rails should no longer be used for the distribution of Holy Communion in the Diocese of Charlotte. Additionally, any parishes using kneelers (or unfixed rails) must remove them. This, we have been told, is to remain consistent with the norms established by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.

While just announced, the faithful are already being told that obedience requires submission. However, we have also heard (unconfirmed) that some priests may be reviewing this with canon lawyers or even requesting a clarification from Rome. We hope that more seek this route as the USCCB does not forbid the use of altar rails, but rather simply states that the norm is to receive standing, while fully permitting the faithful to kneel. It would seem to be a matter of both justice and charity for the Church to provide assistance for those who choose to kneel (accomplished by distributing at a rail).

Indeed, the cultural norm at a significant number of parishes in the diocese is for the faithful to receive kneeling and on the tongue. However, it isn’t just the number of parishes that is interesting, but rather, which parishes and what else is happening there.

This past week the USCCB celebrated its annual National Vocation Awareness Week. As stated on their website:

“National Vocations Awareness Week…is an annual week-long celebration of the Catholic Church in the United States dedicated to promoting vocations to the priesthood, diaconate, and consecrated life…”

One of the most healthy and robust areas inherited by Bishop Martin from his predecessor Bishop Peter Jugis is priestly vocations. Currently Charlotte lists 44 seminarians on their website, an impressive number for a diocese of about half a million Catholics. Additionally, the diocese has ordained 13 men to the priesthood in just the past 2 years, with another 7 11 set to be ordained in 2026.

[Update: I have been informed that 3 other seminarians are being ordained to the transitional diaconate next month and will also be ordained to the priesthood in 2026. Additionally, we have one seminarian being ordained for the FSSP next May].

But there’s something else interesting about the boom in vocations in the Charlotte diocese: 75% of those young men come from parishes where the use of altar rails or communion kneelers has been the norm. Consider that: 3 out of every 4 men in seminary in Charlotte had their vocations fostered in parishes which utilize altar rails.

To be clear, in no way should we assume that correlation is causation; obviously the discernment process and the fostering of vocations is complex: from God’s call, to the prayerful attentiveness to hear and to say yes, to the support at home from family, as well as from the parish community and the pastor.

However, it would also seem irresponsible to ignore that 75% of Charlotte’s current seminarians, and well over half of their recent classes of ordinands, come from such parishes. A recent study even suggested what many of the faithful would say is obvious: how we receive the Eucharist, and how a community supports that reception through traditional practices such as kneeling for communion, plays a sizable part in Eucharistic reverence and belief.

As we consider all of these matters we can only hope that someone will share this information with Bishop Martin.

For the links in the article, go over to the original at Liturgy Guy (linked at the top).

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, Seminarians and Seminaries | Tagged ,
31 Comments

My View For Awhile: the last leg

In Rome the sun rose at 6:52 and set at 16:56.

17:30 is the slated time for the ringing of the Ave Maria bell.

Where I am now the sun rose at 6:36. Where I will wind up Deo Volente the sun will set at 17:31.

It is the Feast of Pope St Leo the Great.

Everything seemed in slow motion at the airport today, check in, bag scanners, people. Odd.

And my flight is delayed – not departure but arrival, making the flight even longer.

We are mostly done with the boarding process and half the plane is empty. Unexpected.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on My View For Awhile: the last leg

Your Sunday Sermon Notes – Dedication of the Lateran 2025

Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all.

Share the good stuff.

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at your Mass of obligation for this Feast of the Dedication of the Lateran.

Tell about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass.

Any local changes or (hopefully good) news?

A couple thoughts about the sign of the cross: HERE  A taste…

[…]

Every person has a “name day” and a “birthday.” So too a church. Our churches are dedicated or consecrated in honor of saints or mysteries of the Faith. The celebration of the dedication recalls the sanctity of the place which, as a consecrated building, has been removed from the temporal order and given entirely to God.

Church buildings should be rich in sacred symbols. This includes a sanctuary with its altar, the sacred space within the sacred space mirroring the Holy of Holies in the Temple of Jerusalem. The prayers for the solemn consecration of a church, especially in the older, traditional Roman Rite, connect the earthly church building to the heavenly Jerusalem of the life to come, described in Scriptures especially in the Book of Revelation.

There are parallels in the rites of the consecration of a church and the rites of Baptism. There are exorcisms. The is washing with water, anointing with Chrism and naming. Alphabets are given in the church as the “opening rites” are given in baptism. And so forth. More on this below.

The rite of consecration and the annual feast of its dedication reflect that the church building is a house of prayer and the place of sacrifice. It is a foreshadowing of the heavenly Jerusalem. It is the microcosm of the Church Universal, the nuptial chamber of the Spouse and the Bride, the way to Calvary and the Garden of the Tomb.

[…]

Posted in Sermons | Tagged
8 Comments

Reid on the liturgical challenges facing Leo XIV

Dom Alcuin Reid has a thoughtful piece at the UK’s Catholic Herald which ever so cordially employs paywalls.

Here’s the last part of Reid’s offering with some emphases and comments.

He starts out stating that Leo XIV seems liturgically level-headed and dignified.  It would be helpful were he to stress what Benedict XVI called ars celebrandi in his Sacramentum caritatis.

[…]

The second area in which the Holy Father will have to exercise leadership is in facilitating a return to the liturgical peace that was violently ended by the abrupt and, as we have recently learnt from new evidence, the carefully manipulated, [cf. lying about the “survey results” to justify Taurina cacata] persecution of those, particularly young people, who have discovered the older liturgical rites and who have “felt its attraction and found in it a form of encounter with the Mystery of the Most Holy Eucharist, particularly suited to them” (Benedict XVI, Letter to the Bishops, 7 July 2007).

The Pope has spoken often of his desire for unity, peace and reconciliation. There is no more important area for this than in the worship of the Church. [Liturgy is doctrine.  We are our rites.] But we must be clear: unity does not mean uniformity. The liturgy has always rejoiced in a rich, legitimate diversity, even in the Western rite – as the rites of different religious orders and historic dioceses attest. It is only since the most recent Council that attempts have been made, and recently renewed, to impose a rigid uniformity, falsely appealing to the need for “unity” and “communion”.

Those involved [I think McTeigue would call them the “members of the people who should know better club”] should have learnt in “Theology 101” that these are fundamentally sacramental and theological realities which do not require uniform ritual expression. Proponents of moving on “to the second phase” of liturgical reform know this at least implicitly, but conveniently ignore it in respect of the older rites.

As Supreme Pastor, the Holy Father needs to correct this error and end the Stalinist persecution of the older rites being waged by the Archbishop Secretary of the Dicastery and by certain bishops. This campaign, gleefully presided over by the Cardinal Prefect, has fractured unity and scandalised many good faithful, particularly families, driving them away and forcing them to find solutions at times “outside the system”.

It is hard to see how this is anything other than an ideological campaign by partisans of a particular political liturgical viewpoint, the legitimacy of which is highly questionable. It is certainly not pastoral in the true sense of that word – it does not serve the salvation of souls – and it has given rise to ungodly bitterness on all sides.

The Pope has already given one encouraging sign: his permission for the celebration of Mass in the usus antiquior (the older form) in St Peter’s Basilica by Cardinal Burke for the annual pilgrimage of those who worship according to the older rites. The extraordinarily large numbers at this Mass – around 5,000 when only 1,000 were expected – speak loudly. It is hard to imagine Pope Leo seeking to continue to ban such genuine fervour and devotion.

I doubt the Holy Father will wish to address the issue of the “reform of the liturgical reform” spoken of over a decade ago. [If I read Reid right, I think he is talking about what figures such as Fr. Fessio suggested.  I, respectfully, think that that was a dead end.  On a positive note, it got people better informed about what Sacrosanctum Concilium really said, as well as thinking and talking it.] Those officially “in charge” abhor the mere thought of “correcting” the modern rites in the light of critiques made of their fidelity to the Council itself. And those who celebrate the usus antiquior see little point in any such effort. This minefield may have to wait a little longer before being cleared.

After the Holy Father’s election, our community revived the traditional prayers for the Pope sung during adoration on Sunday after Vespers. [This was also done at The Parish™] Leo XIV is not Benedict XVI, nor is he Francis. But he is the Pope, and as such he needs our fervent prayers that he will teach and govern wisely and prudently, most especially in respect of the Sacred Liturgy, “the summit toward which the activity of the Church is directed …[and] the font from which all her power flows” (Sacrosanctum Concilium, 10).  [fons et culmen]

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
12 Comments