This is pretty bad, from CWN:
Cardinal prefect, [NOT RATZINGER!] Canadian hierarchy knew of Vatican official’s abuse
April 09, 2010Seven Ontario bishops and Cardinal José Sanchez, the prefect for the Congregation for the Clergy, were aware by 1993 that the secretary-general of the Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith had committed sexual abuse, [of children?] according to a February 1993 letter from the bishop of Pembroke (Ontario) to Canada’s apostolic nuncio. [i am not quite sure that that position is a "Vatican position". Not sure about that.]
At the time of Msgr. Bernard Prince’s 1991 appointment to the Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith, Bishop Joseph Windle of Pembroke was aware that the priest had abused one boy. [of a child] Nonetheless, he recalled in the 1993 letter that “while the charge against Fr. Prince was very serious,” [get this…] he had not objected “to him being given another chance [wait for it….] since it would remove him from the Canadian scene.” [Disgusting. Simply disgusting.]
By 1993, however, Bishop Windle had become aware that [But wait! There’s more!] there were four or five victims. In his letter to Archbishop Carlo Curis, who served as apostolic nuncio to Canada from 1990 to 1999, Bishop Windle urged [Get this… here’s a noble stand from a bishop!] that Father Prince not be given a papal honor or promoted to the episcopate, noting that such a move could prompt victims to speak out publicly. [Disgusting. Yah… give him that job to get him out of Dodge. But don’t attract more attention to him so that victims will not get riled up. Disgusting.]
Three months after he wrote the letter, Bishop Windle retired at age 75; he died in 1997. The Globe and Mail notes that Bishop Windle, contrary to the policy adopted by Canadian bishops in 1993, did not report the abuse to civil authorities. [Why?]
Msgr. Prince continued to serve as secretary-general of the Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith until 2004. Laicized by Pope Benedict in 2009, Prince is currently serving a four-year prison term after being convicted of sexually abusing 13 young men between 1964 and 1984. The victims were between 10 and 16 years old. [So.. it was a homosexual thing… again.]
What a loathsome tale. He committed crimes and they just covered it over.
I am forced to wonder what role the homosexual nature of this played in this ghastly tragedy.





















