21 December: Feast of “doubting” St. Thomas and the beating, living, healing, Heart of Love.

The nice folks at One Peter Five invited me to post a weekly column for Sundays. I’ve happily obliged. In 2022 this…. Some tastes.

By me at One Peter Five:

[…]

Christ showed [the Apostles in the locked room] His hands and feet and side, to demonstrate that He had a real body and that it was also is His Body. He didn’t pick up some unwounded, perfect Body that He was now inhabiting. We are our bodies, as we are our rites. The fact that the wounds remained in His Body’s hands, feet and side provided continuity with His Body before and during His Passion. He isn’t a mere shade of the Lord. Nor has he exchanged Himself for an unwounded version. In this way Christ began to show them the traits of the risen Body, traits which we, too, will share in the Resurrection: clarity (reflecting God’s glory), impassibility (incapable of suffering), agility (ease and speed of movement), subtlety (unhindered by barriers).

[…]

We don’t know why Thomas wasn’t with the other ten Apostles in the room for that first appearance of the Lord. I like to imagine that it was his turn to get the “take out” for the rest of them.

Thomas, who had doubted, put his trust in the Lord at this point. In fact, he literally handed his trust to Him where the point of the lance had left its mark on the Lord’s glorious Risen Body, a wound from a Roman lance large enough to insert his hand. The Lord told Thomas to “thrust” (Greek bále) his hand “eis ten pleurán… into (His) side”. If we want to be picky, we might note that the Greek word “cheír”, insofar as our anatomy is concerned, can mean “hand”, but it can also mean “finger” or “hand and arm”, the later so much so that in some contexts additional words are added to denote “hand” as distinct from the arm (cf. Liddell-Scott-Jones, A Greek-English Lexicon aka LSJ – “χείρ , ἡ”).

This is significant for depictions in art, as in the famous painting by Caravaggio, wherein Thomas puts his finger into Christ’s side and peers into it, which smacks of the spirituality of St. Bonaventure who wrote about how Thomas the Apostle looked through the Lord’s visible wounds and saw His invisible wound of love. It also affects depictions of the crucifixion of the Lord and of His risen Body, with the holes of the nails in the hands. Some maintain that Christ would have been crucified with nails through the wrists so that the ulna and radius bones would sustain His Body’s weight rather than tearing through the flesh of His hands.

Christ tells Thomas to explore with his finger (dáktylos) the spike holes of His “hands/wrists”, which would be more or less the size of a large finger. However, he tells Thomas to use his hand for the wound in His side. The Greek suggests to me that the Lord instructed Thomas to push, thrust His hand into the wound channel left by the Roman lance, which had gone so far as to lacerate the Lord’s Sacred Heart.

We don’t have in the Gospel account of this stunning moment, to which John was eyewitness, a precise statement by John that Thomas physically did it. All it says is that Thomas responded, “My Lord and my God!” Christ responded with a “beatitude” (v. 29): “Jesus said to him, “Have you believed because you have seen me? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe.”

Was Thomas so overwhelmed that He could not touch the Lord in that way? All He could utter was that amazing witness to belief in the divinity of Christ? The clearest and most exultant of any in the Gospels?

Christ refers to Thomas seeing Him, but He did not say, “because you have touched me”. Nevertheless, it seems to me that if the Risen Christ tells you to do something, you do it. Furthermore, John immediately concludes this chapter with something so definitive that it feels like the end of the whole work (vv. 30-31):

Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of the disciples, which are not written in this book; but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in his name.

There follows chapter 21 and the account of the reconciliation of Peter at the Sea of Galilee. We moderns count that as chapter 21. Remember, the Gospels were not written with chapters and verses and not even word breaks. Those were imposed centuries later. Yet, one has the sense that what happened between Christ and Thomas was so amazing that John penned something like a conclusion to his Gospel after Thomas’s cry of faith, arguably the climax of John’s account.

Given the various meanings of “hand” in Greek, and that word “thrust”, and the fact that the wound from the lance remained, therefore remained all the way to His Heart, perhaps Our Lord required Thomas not merely to touch His side but even to feel the breath, the ruach, in His torn lung. Did Thomas, while feeling the ruach on his wrist, touch with his hand the physical, risen, subtle, impassible, agile, blazing bright Heart of Jesus?

By the way, in art, statues and painting, the Apostles are usually depicted with the instruments of their martyrdom. St. Thomas is often depicted with a lance.

On this Sunday we emphasize the mercy of God and the institution of the Sacrament of Penance, perhaps the greatest encounter we have with incarnate Mercy, Holy Communion notwithstanding.

Christ told Thomas to do what He did before witnesses so that they too would understand about the traits of His risen Body and that it was truly His own. Knowing full well that we would one day read this, He inspired the disciple He most loved to write his Gospel account, an account that connects Thomas to the inspiration of the Spirit and the mercy of Christ’s Heart in a way that other Apostles didn’t experience on that first Easter evening appearance.

When we go to confession, we enter into Mercy in order to be breathed upon by the Spirit and to feel the beating, living, healing, Heart of Love.

Posted in Classic Posts, Linking Back |
1 Comment

ROME SHOT 888

Please remember me when  CHRISTMAS  shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE  These links take you to a generic “catholic” search in Amazon. Amazon remembers that you used my link and I get the credit.  WHY?  This helps to pay for insurance (massively hiked for next year), utilities, groceries, all the necessities.  You get the items you need and, at no extra cost to you, you provide important help for which I am grateful.

More great news here…. if you can see it.  I understand that on 21 Dec Twitter/X had a global timeline melt down.  Maybe it is fixed, maybe not.  I got the code for this embed before it happened.

And there’s this…

White to move and mate in 3.


1. Rf6+ Kc5 2. Rc7+ Qc6 3. Rxc6#
NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

Use FATHERZ10 at checkout

I think the tide of public opinion is turning against young Alireza Firouza and his last minute bid to raise his ELO (rating) in order to gain a slot in the next Candidates Tournament (to play for the World Champ title – whatever that means without Magnus in it)… at the expense of Wesley So.   His local club in Chartres put together a tournament of some players with lower ratings who have been rather inactive (ratings don’t drop with inactivity) who were chosen, I’m just guessing, perhaps they don’t mind losing and thus losing rating and they want Firouza to win.  There was a curious resignation of one of his opponents in a pretty much even position with 40 seconds on the clock.  I don’t understand that entirely.

I read a fantastic story in The Guardian about an 8-yr old girl of Indian heritage in England who WON in the women’s section at the European rapid and blitz championship in Zagreb, Croatia last weekend. She won 8.5/13 against a field of highly rated and experienced grandmasters, international masters and experts, and came 73rd in a round of 555 players. Her father says she got into chess “accidently”. In the open section seeh beat an 39-yr old IM and drew a 54 yr-old GM, twice the Romanian national champion. Lemme tell ya’ somethin’. When I go to play OTB and some little kid shows up, I don’t make assumptions other than: I assume I’d better bring it. And I am really rooting for Alice Lee, of my native place in the Minnesota. She’s 14 and wiping the floor with all sorts of top players.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
5 Comments

Hell’s Bible is on board, and what shipmates they have!

Quarter page ad in the New York Times (aka Hell’s Bible) which had a spontaneous photographer handy at a spontaneous event recently, also featured in Hell’s Bible.

Not deceptive at all, is it?

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
5 Comments

In the wake of “Fiducia supplicans” – UPDATES

UPDATES BELOW: 21 Dec ’23 – 12:52

BTW… you know what the next step is, right? Already there?

Change the Catechism of the Catholic Church.


ORIGINALLY Published on: Dec 20, 2023

One online priest, a homosexualist, said:

“As a priest I look forward to blessing same-sex couples, sharing with them the graces that God desires for everyone, something I’ve waited years to do.”

I’ll just bet you waited.  Sure, you did.

The problem with a statement like this is that, if a person in disposed to receive them, all persons can receive the graces that God desires to give.  Also God does not desire to give the same graces to everyone.  Some yes, such as sanctifying grace, of course.  Some, yes, prevenient graces, of course.

He also wrote:

“Be wary of the “Nothing has changed” response to today’s news. It’s a significant change. In short, yesterday, as a priest, I was forbidden to bless same-sex couples at all. Today, with some limitations, I can.”

Now what?

Hey look!  A spontaneous blessing!   With a spontaneous NY Times photographer who was spontaneously hanging out!

Meanwhile, the Bishops of Malawi and Zambia (at least) [UPDATE – and Ukrainians and Polish] have prohibited priests from giving blessings to “couples”.   The Archbishop of Astana, Kazakhstan and Bp. Schneider issued a letter which is strongly against this move.

Also, this is an astute observation on the part of an acquaintance of mine. I spotted this the instant I heard about the document: all blessings are, in a sense, liturgical. However the new document says the blessings of “couples” aren’t to be liturgical.

So, I guess they aren’t to be given?

I dislike the Book of Blessings, which is ironically bereft of blessings.  The point is that a priestly blessing, even a simple one, has a liturgical character.

Moreover,…

And then…

Of course the moderation queue is ON and I will be picky.

QUAERITUR:

Will there be a Latin text of “Fiducia supplicans”?  There’s a title!

UPDATES 21 Dec ’23:

Here’s something from a Cardinal who defended Amoris… which lead to Fiducia.

Meanwhile, Fr. Thomas Weinandy, theologian of note but seemingly an enemy of traditional liturgy … so, he is NOT one of those American trads that Rome seems to blame everything on… and neither are the bishops conferences of MALAWI or NIGERIA or ZAMBIA…

At The Catholic Thing, this is pretty hard core…

[…]

The pope or a bishop maybe, by virtue of his office, a member of the magisterium, but his teaching, if it contradicts the received previous magisterial teaching, is not magisterial. Such false teaching simply fails to meet the necessary criteria. It possesses no ecclesial authoritative credentials. Rather, it is simply an ambiguous or flawed statement that attempts or pretends to be magisterial, when it’s not.

Second, to bless couples in irregular marriages or same-sex couples without giving the impression that the Church is not validating their sexual activity is a charade. All those present at such blessings know, without a doubt, that such relationships are sexual in nature. No one is fooled. Actually, they are rejoicing that such sexual relations are being blessed. That’s the point of these blessings. It is not their sexual abstinence being blessed, but their sexual indulgence.

Third, while couples in irregular marriages and same-sex couples can be blessed, what cannot be blessed, and so validated, is the sin in which they are engaged. It is impossible to bless an immoral act, and to attempt to do so is blasphemy, for one is asking the all-holy God to do something that is contrary to his nature — the sanctioning of sin. Moreover, to bless irregular marriages and same-sex couples, for the purposes of authenticating their sexual activity, is an affront to and a demeaning of the sacrament of marriage itself. Such blessings undermine the dignity of marriage — a sacramental sign of the indissoluble union between Christ and his Church.

[…]

At The Pillar I read a piece by former Prefect of the CDF – who knows more than his prayers – Gerhard Card. Müller.  The old phrase is “Qui distinguit bene docet… He teaches well who makes distinctions”.  Müller breaks blessings down into three categories, two which are consistent with Catholic teaching and practice and one which has been invented from whole cloth (guess which kind).  He demonstrates that FS is self-contradictory.

[…]

With the Declaration Fiducia supplicans (FS) on the Pastoral Significance of Blessings, the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) has made an affirmation that has no precedent in the teaching of the Catholic Church. In fact, this document affirms that it is possible for a priest to bless (not liturgically, but privately) couples who live in a sexual relationship outside of marriage, including same-sex couples. The many questions raised by bishops, priests, and laity in response to these statements deserve a clear and unequivocal response.

Does this statement not clearly contradict Catholic teaching? Are the faithful obliged to accept this new teaching? May the priest perform such new practices that have just been invented? And can the diocesan bishop forbid them if they were to take place in his diocese? To answer these questions, let us see what exactly the document teaches and what arguments it relies on.

The document, which was neither discussed nor approved by the General Assembly of Cardinals and Bishops of this Dicastery, acknowledges that the hypothesis (or teaching?) it proposes is new and that it is based primarily on the pastoral magisterium of Pope Francis.

[…]

The last statement is accurate.  Remember Fernandez stating something about the primacy of the “magisterium of Francis”?

Here are the footnotes of FS.

I note that the footnotes cite De Benedictionibus (the infamous “Book of Blessings” – which has only one prayer that bless things because the idea was to destroy the categories of invocative and constitutive)  says that all blessings are “liturgical” and yet FS says that whatever it is that is to be imparted is not to be “liturgical.

The 500 strong Confraternity of Catholic Clergy in England and Wales put this out.

By contrast, sort of… Bp. Barron of Winona-Rochester in my native Minnesota…

FS is “congruent with the the pastoral instincts of Pope Francis”.  Okay.  Very deft. But is it congruent with Catholic teaching and perennial practice?  There ought to be someone nearby every Pope who says, “Ummm… we need to think this through.”  I wonder what role the official “Papal Theologian” had…  has had… has had for a while.

Again in my native Minnesota, Bp. Cozzens (who was in seminary behind me) of Crookston wrote HERE:

[…]

This blessing is not for people seeking a legitimation of same sex union but for those seeking to live better: “there is no intention to legitimize anything, but rather to open one’s life to God, to ask for his help to live better, and also to invoke the Holy Spirit so that the values of the Gospel may be lived with greater faithfulness” (FS 40).

[…]

And of course, as the Vatican made clear, “Any blessing will be an opportunity for a renewed proclamation of the kerygma, an invitation to draw ever closer to the love of Christ” (FS, 44). Thus, when people come to the Church seeking her blessing let us also proclaim to them the saving love of Jesus found through repentance for all of us who are sinners.

[…]

With due respect to His Excellency, I don’t think the Vatican made this issue clear.  At least that statement ends with the point that there must be repentance.

Archbp. Viganò... well… “servants of Satan”… “delirious Declaration”… “abomination of desolation”… you get the drift.  I think that’s a “No” vote for FS.

A priest of the Companions of Christ, present on the interwebs, has a couple of self-apologetic videos about  FS and his intention to … well… bless same-sex couples. The first one HERE says that this is an excellent document and a “victory” for conservative Catholics.  The second one HERE is apologetic (in the technical sense) defending his previous stance. There’s a lot of emotion.  I think Father needs to think about this more.

At Crisis Magazine, Msgr. Richard C. Antall has a piece called “Prudence and Symbolic Ambiguity” with the tag “If you knew that the person was going to misunderstand your blessing, would it be right to let him or her be in vincible ignorance?”

There’s a lot more out there.

Out of the chaos some clarity will emerge.

In the meantime, please consider what I wrote the other day:

More than ever there is greater need and urgency that we make sure our own “houses are in order”. If you don’t already,…

  • start making thorough and honest examinations of conscience.
  • Start making reparation for wrongs and sins.
  • Undertake sincerely to forgive those who have harmed you.
  • Do penances.
  • Seek to purify memories.
  • Perform corporal and spiritual works of mercy.
  • Dedicate some time each day to prayer, especially the Rosary.
  • Attend to the duties of your state in life.
  • Read Scripture and review your catechism.
  • Pray for priests and bishops.
  • Go to confession regularly.
  • Receive Communion only in the state of grace.

UPDATE 12 Dec 17:25

This is pretty big.

Posted in Sin That Cries To Heaven |
23 Comments

News of the Church 05

It’s 21 December 2023 and it is the 3rd Week of Advent and it is the Winter Solstice. Some time ago, I saw a movie called News of the World in which, years after the Civil War, a former confederate officer ekes out a living going from town to town reading various newspaper stories from all over to people who pay a dime a head – in today’s money about $2.50. The idea caught my imagination and here I am, a gazetteer.

An audio “gazette” of Catholic things. https://zuhlsdorf.computer/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/23_12_21_NofC_05.mp3

00:12 – Init – Winter Solstice
02:50 – Latin Liturgy Newsletter
– 03:08 Detroit – Prayer in Protestant Cemeteries
– 04:57 FSSP News
– 08:20 Floriani
– 10:23 Children’s Book on Purgatory. New Friends Now and Forever [US HERE -UK HERE]
– 12:20 Why Latin? An answer
14:45 – A Christmas Letter from a family
20:23 – The Wanderer – 7 Dec 2023 – Plenary Indulgence for prayer a Nativity Scene
20:17 – The Wanderer 14 Dec – Nigerian priest abducted.
– 27:40 – What are the sins that “cry to heaven for vengeance”?
30:20 – Israel 365News – Archeologists find Biblical Sodom and Gomorrah
42:11 – Concealed Carry Magazine – Naked guy in the house
43:50 – Sacred Music Fall 2023 – About Paul VI and “Modern Man” and “New Mass”
50:55 – Exit

 

Posted in News of the Church, SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
Comments Off on News of the Church 05

Priests and the imparting of blessings for same-sex “couples”. Risks? Wherein Fr. Z prays.

This comes via a comment under another post HERE

QUAERITUR:

Serious question – if a priest were to bless an unholy act, would he be bringing a curse upon himself?

God the Father is very clear in the Dialogue of St. Catherine of Siena about this particular sin and the standard to which He holds His priests.

I needed some time to think about this and to consult.

First, the reference to the Dialogue, above. Reminder: I wrote about that HERE. In a nutshell, St. Catherine, Doctor and Patroness of Europe and of Italy, in her her Dialogues (ch 124), writes that the Enemy, demons, incite people to unnatural sins (homosexual acts) but that they don’t stick around to see them happen, because those acts  are too repulsive even for them.   As Christ – concerning priests especially – told St. Catherine:

Not that the evil displeases [demons] because they like anything good, but because their nature was originally angelic, and their angelic nature causes them to loathe the sight of the actual commission of this enormous sin. They truly enough hurl the arrow poisoned with the venom of concupiscence, but when their victim proceeds to the actual commission of the sin, they depart for the reason and in the manner that I have said.

Such acts can result in extraordinary demonic activity like oppression, obsession, possession.  Demons are legalistic.  They claim a right to “attach”, as it were. Their claim has to be broken. Certain sins – including unnatural sex acts – give demons a claim on a person or place. If a priest then blesses a homoerotic couple… what does that imply for the claim of the demons? Could the demons make a claim on the priest for what he did?

Extraordinary demonic activity such as oppression, obsession, possession is morally neutral.  As a matter of fact, not that a person should ever undertake such a route, God forbid!, possession can be the occasion for a person to attain to great holiness.

That said – and this has to be perfectly clear – the commission of even a venial sin is morally worse than being possessed.   Sin is worse than ordinary or extraordinary demonic activity.

Priests (seminarians, religious) are high value targets for the Enemy, who has limited time just as we do.  There is a much higher incidence of extraordinary demonic activity for priests (etc.) who commit sins such as viewing porn as there would be among, say, high school students or your average Joe.   Without denigrating them in the least, the latter are a dime a dozen.  Priests are high value targets.  Hence, anything that might incite extraordinary demonic activity is going to have a far higher risk for priests than most lay people.

The graver the sin, the higher the risk.

A blessing invokes the names of the Most Holy Trinity, naming the Father, and the Son and the Holy Spirit.   Their very names are sacred.  Invoking them to bestow blessings, graces, is decidedly non-trivial.

Think about it: Invoke the Trinity in the blessing of those whom you know intend to be engaging in such acts?  It is sacrilege.

An exorcist I spoke to before posting this called it “horrific”.

The only way in which it would not be sacrilege is if the couple are firmly resolved to cease their homoerotic and unnatural behavior and therefore they are asking for a blessing, to help them in their conversion, not to affirm them in their status quo ante.  In that case, when this is manifest, I think a priest should bless them – in view of their determination not to sin and to change their lives.

Analogy.  At the beginning of a sacramental confession, you have sorrow for sins and a firm purpose of amendment.  In our common English language form of going to confession what do you say?  “Bless me, Father…”.  You are sorry for your sins and you want to amend your life.  You want to make as good a confession as you can, so you ask for the priest’s blessing.  In hearing confessions I silently add a prayer that our holy angel guardians will protect us, keep the penitent from attacks and distractions.

Blessings are non-trivial.

For a priest to bless a homoerotic couple, who show no sign of repentance, no indication of conversion or cessation, but rather gives every indication of continuing in their ways, would be, in light of the invocation of the Most Holy Trinity, a sin of sacrilege.

Since priests are high value targets for the Enemy, it follows that a priest who blesses such an unrepentant couple are in a greater risk extraordinary demonic activity as a result of his own sin and complicity.

We are living in an age when the sense of the sacred has been terribly eroded.   Liturgical worship worthy of the name “sacred” is harder and harder to find.  Music for worship is mostly anything but sacred.  The Most Sacred Body and Blood of Christ and the sacred vessels consecrated to contain them are handled by anyone and everyone without the consecration of their hands for the task.   Communion is regularly received sacrilegiously by those who have not confessed their sins for who knows how long.  Buildings and vestments.  The whole of it.  And there’s teaching in schools, formation in catechism, preaching from pulpits.  We’ve heard more about climate and immigration and covid than we do about transcendence, sacrality and holiness.

The names of the Trinity are sacred.  To bless is a very brief liturgical act.   Think about how most prayers of blessings have always begun (and still do begin even in the post-Conciliar so-called Book of Blessings).  They start with the priest saying “Adiutorium nostrum in nomine Domini... Our help is in the name of the Lord”, to which those present respond “Qui fecit caelum et terram… Who made Heaven and Earth.”  They go on with “Dominus vobiscum“, etc., and end with affirmation in “Amen” as a response.  If that isn’t liturgical… what is it?

Liturgies are for worship of God, the fulfillment of the virtue of religion, not the implication of that which is most sacred in the ongoing determination to commit terrible sins.

Hence, to tell most people today that the blessing – whatever that is – of a same-sex couple – ’cause love is love, okay? – is a sacrilege is going to be sort of like shouting down a well.

What does sacrilege mean for those who have no idea of what sacrality is?

I’m afraid that, by now, many priests and perhaps even bishops, might have succumbed to the times in this regard.

Objections may come.  “But God is merciful!”  Okay, but God is just and God is not to be mocked.” “You are mean!”  No, I want people to go to Heaven and that might require painful effort.  “The Pope says you have to do it.”  No, I really don’t.   “The Church’s teaching has changed.” No, it really hasn’t.  “You hate gays!”  Not in the least.  I am unwilling to lie to them.

Finally, something more to contemplate from the Jewish, rabbinic tradition.

At the top, I mentioned the Dialogues of St. Catherine of Siena.  In the passage I cited, Christ says:

[The sin of sodomy] does indeed displease Me so much and I hold it in such abomination that for it alone I buried five cities by a Divine judgment, My Divine justice being no longer able to endure it.

Turning to the rabbinic tradition, Rabbi Huna (Talmudist +297) said that

“The generation of the Flood was not wiped out until they wrote marriage documents or contracts for the union of a man to a male or to an animal.” – Genesis Rabbah 26:5 (Genesis 6:2) (cf. also Leviticus Rabbah 23:9 (Leviticus 18:2-4)

Get that?  God did not bring on the Flood because men were committing unnatural acts.  He brought the Flood because they codified same-sex unions.  They gave them approval.  As it were, they blessed them.

Hmmm… Save The Liturgy… Save The World.

Fathers!  I am praying for you.   Do not commit sacrilege.

I pray that God will protect you from spiritual and temporal harm. 

I pray for you to invoke your Confirmed character so as to be strong when you are tried. 

I pray that Mary, Queen of Priests, will place her mantle over you. 

I pray that St. Joseph, Terror of Demons, will guard you. 

I pray that Sts. Michael and Gabriel and Raphael will fight beside you, inspire you, and heal you.

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Priests and Priesthood, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, SESSIUNCULA, Sin That Cries To Heaven, The Drill | Tagged ,
17 Comments

From “The Private Diary of Bishop F. Atticus McButterpants” – 23-12-19: Blessing gals and guys

December 19th, 2023

Dear Diary,

Blessing of gals and guys.  THANKS ALOT.  Now WHAT?!?

Heck, I bless everything! Houses, cars, new offices in the chancery, campfires at camp, booze, ribs, sandwiches, you name it. It’s like that TV show, “That’s what I do. I’m a bishop and I bless stuff.”  Bottom line: It makes people happy. That’s what I think this is about, happy. Blessing two gals, or two guys. It’ll make them happy. It’ll make everyone happy! Won’t it? I bless animals on St. Francis every year. Fr. Tommy keeps saying it’s MY feast day,  Francis – hate that name. Thanks mom.  This is for dogs. Even Chester tho he needs an exercising not a blessing.  What would THAT be like?  Blessing implies approval.  I think.  I read that somewhere.  Is there is dog whisper-exerciser? I wonder where can I find a guy to do that?  Fr. Gilbert?

I can bless Danny’s heela monster and Tina’s pet gopher and a couple of poodles. Why can’t I bless two gals or guys? Great-uncle Pete said “as long as they don’t frighten the horses!”  Heck I if I can bless a couple of shitsoos I can  bless Stan and Bruce. Right?

The thing is the yearly blessing of the animals is a favorite of mine.  Okay I get bitten and peed on. I mean, if two guys come up to me and ask for a blessing, I’m gonna say, what? “Hey just promise not to bite or pee on me!”  HA HA I think they do that.  Yuk.  And then, say only what Tommy says a thousand times today – “May Almighty God bless you, in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.” Fr Tommy got after me about not using “in the name of the” but I like how it sounds! Kinda sporty.  He’s prob right, again.  Just say that old fashion form and not add extra words.  At least in these cases.  Extra words = trouble.

I asked Vice for a short briefing on this. I wanted him to draw up a statement for the diocesan website. Damn, it was tough to track him down. It’s like he didn’t wanna talk about it. What’s up with that? Can’t look like we were caught off guard. The Noonch couple was bad enough, the way they ambushed me. Glad that’s basically over. Thank God they live in another diocese.

Tonight I was with people with a yool log, which was great. Hot toddys!  The decorations were really fun.  Lots of lights.  Chester… strange… keep growling at the blinking lights on the side of the fireplace.  Ya gotta wonder what’s going on in that lopsided head.  Or not.

Posted in Diary of Bp. McButterpants, SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
2 Comments

ROME SHOT 887

Please remember me when  CHRISTMAS  shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE  These links take you to a generic “catholic” search in Amazon. Amazon remembers that you used my link and I get the credit.  WHY?  This helps to pay for insurance (massively hiked for next year), utilities, groceries, all the necessities.  You get the items you need and, at no extra cost to you, you provide important help for which I am grateful.

Black to move and mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

The wonderful nuns of Gower Abbey, the Benedictines of Mary, Queen of Apostles, have a lovely Christmas carol album.  Caroling at Ephesus .

US HERE – UK HERE

There’s also Christmas At Ephesus and Advent At Ephesus

Also, I went to the online store link for the Benedictines of Mary and the photo shows the late-great Extraordinary Ordinary, Bishop Robert Morlino.  We need more like him and we need them NOW.

In chessy news, Alireza won his third in the cobbled-up scramble to improve his rating.  I don’t care it this is happening in Chartres or not, there is something wrong with this even though it is within the rules.   Just because one can do something doesn’t mean one should it.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

From “The Private Diary of Bishop F. Atticus McButterpants” – 23-12-17: fait accompli

December 17th, 2023

Dear Diary,

It was the usual for Goadate Sunday at SP.  I dusted off all the pink jokes and got some chuckles here and there.  I guess they’ve heard them.  But I had a chance to check out the confessionals.

After the last few days of digs from everyone about getting the old cathedral boxes cleaned on Friday I blew up at Fr. Tommy.  “If it’s so damn important to you, then you get it done!”   I shoulda just kept my mouth shut.   What does Tommy do but smile and say “If you say so, bishop” and slowly strolled away.  Next thing I know, I’m getting a call from McSwiney who says that about a dozen of the young priests were swarming all over the confessionals and with the help of a couple dozen laymen including carpenters and an electritian and women with their stuff and seminarians and the maintinance guys they had taken out old decorations and lost and found stuff that had been in there for only God know how long cleaning stuff the ushers things and the … and the … and the.  They had tools and varnishes and lightbulbs and fixtures and polishing goop.   It was all nearly over before McS even knew what was going on.  All four of them done!  He’s furious.  He went after Tommy something fierce but – I would have paid money to see this – Tommy dished it back with all the other priests standing by him, glaring.  Tommy handed McS his name plate to slide into the slot on the door!!! I’ll bet he turned purple!!  McS said Tommy said, “It’s what the bishop ordered. And he wants them used.”   I listened to the phone for a while and just told him to make it work.  But if he didn’t use them, a lot of people were going to be asking why he fixed them up.  At SP this morning there were stacks of people telling McS and me they were so happy to see the confessionals all spiffed up.

After the 10am Tommy and Fr Bill got into the boxes and turned on the lights and right away lines formed.  I don’t get it.  They make it look so easy.  The ushers. I thought they were going to have a fit, but they were elated.  They said they had plenty of room in another place and it was worth it etc.

The confessionals really take me back.  Gotta hand it to Tommy.  Well played.  Of course I’m going to catch hell from a few of guys on the priests council and a bunch of the pastors.  I can hear it now.  “Now people are going to want the same thing.”  They’re not going to be happy.

 

Posted in Diary of Bp. McButterpants | Tagged
10 Comments

ROME SHOT 886

Please remember me when  CHRISTMAS  shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE  These links take you to a generic “catholic” search in Amazon. Amazon remembers that you used my link and I get the credit.  WHY?  This helps to pay for insurance (massively hiked for next year), utilities, groceries, all the necessities.  You get the items you need and, at no extra cost to you, you provide important help for which I am grateful.

From the marvelous presepio at Ss Trinità dei Pelegrini.

WELCOME REGISTRANT:

DPH-Nantes

Meanwhile,… white to move.  There’s a mate here if you can find it, a couple ways.


1. Bf4 Rb7 2. Nd4 c6 3. Nxc6 Nd7 4. Bf7#

Use FATHERZ10 at checkout

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

Interested in learning?  Try THIS.

Great Christmas present ideas at Chess House!  Every home needs a chess set.  Every kid needs a chance to learn.  It’s a lifelong gift.

The monks of Le Barroux are trying to get a new tractor for their vineyard and they need to sell wine.  Since you need wine for yourselves or a gifts to others…. see how well this works out?

In Chessy News, the slate for the Candidates has been announced by FIDE but there are machinations and shenanigans afoot to try to hustle up some ELO (rating points) for a couple players who are not too far behind Wesley So. A tournament was cobbled up in India for Erigaisi and Gukesh. In France the Chess Club of Chartres… yes, Chartres…  C’Chartres Echecs – will magically have a tournament so that local boy and club member Alireza Firouzja (2750) can play classical matches against a 2546, a 2506, and a 2439 to farm up some additional ELO points. On Monday, Firouzja won the first game of his match against the 2439 and with a current live-rating of 2751.8 he is now only 5.6 rating points behind Wesley So (live-rating 2757.4). I’m reminded of what happened before the last Candidates in Madrid when Ding Liren played an insane number of games quickly and all inside Chinese against Chinese players to punch up his ELO and get him a spot. This is one reason why FIDE said that a certain number of matches have to be played outside one’s country (or at least I think that’s what the byzantine-crazy qualification rubrics say). I wonder if anyone really understands what is going on and how this all works. That notwithstanding, something is mighty dodgy. Last minute tournaments popping up like mushrooms on grandmaster’s lawns for the sake of garnering a few points and the chance to bump Wesley off the roster.

MEANWHILE…

After growing up in Minnesota and serving in Wisconsin….  A little up north humor donchya know.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
8 Comments