The persecution of Tradition, Priests and the affliction of Moral Injury

A year ago, I posted about the psychological abuse of priests and the resulting moral injury.  This topic returned to the fore as I read a recent story about a priest who was forced out of his position because he has celebrated the Traditional Latin Mass for people before the cruel Traditionis custodes was issued.

As priests are going to resist the cruelty and press on, what will be the backlash?  As some priests are going to knuckle-under and give up what they know to be good, true and beautiful for the sake of a wholly unjust and incoherent act of whimsical oppression, what will be the result.

Moral injury.

_______

Originally Published on: Jun 9, 2020 

From a reader…

I am a physician and have had the opportunity to work with several burnt out priests over the years. I am concerned about the emotional well being of priests during the current situation because of a stressor being called moral injury.

This injury comes from a situation when a person cannot take an action that he feels to be morally right, or is forced to do something morally wrong, by the order of a superior. I am concerned that priests are experiencing this as there bishops have prohibited the sacraments. [During COVID-1984 Theater]

I am keeping this in prayer but I am hoping by alerting you to this condition it might be get into some hands who are in a position to work with priests with moral injury to at least recognize this reality.

This is very interesting.  I am grateful for the information and tip about “moral injury”. Since I received this, I’ve done some reading and thinking about moral injury.  For example, good starting point summary of main points HERE

Consider this:

WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES OF MORAL INJURY?
Moral injury can lead to serious distress, depression, and suicidality. Moral injury can take the life of those suffering from it, both metaphorically and literally. Moral injury debilitates people, preventing them from living full and healthy lives.

The effects of moral injury go beyond the individual and can destroy one’s capacity to trust others, impinging on the family system and the larger community. Moral injury must be brought forward into the community for a shared process of healing.

In the context of a soul, with respect to the diversity of beliefs and religious perspectives held by those involved with moral injury, consider this:

Moral injury is damage done to the soul of the individual. War is one (but not the only) thing that can cause this damage. Abuse, rape, and violence may cause similar types of damage. “Soul repair” and “soul wound” are terms already in use by researchers and institutions in the United States who are exploring moral injury and pathways to recovery.

One writer defines moral injury as resulting from a betrayal of what is morally right by someone who holds legitimate authority and in a high stakes situation.

For example, priests who really believe in the cura animarum, and who are ordered, bullied, threatened by authority above them to go against what they believe is right and good for themselves and their people.   Application: being virtually forbidden to provide the sacraments to the faithful during the COVID-1984 lockdown.

[Include: The threat of retribution for celebration of Holy Mass with the 1962 Missale Romanum.]

[…]

In many cases tradition-inclined priests have been treated savagely by their bishops and other priests.  Traditional Catholic have been too.  They have been for years, even for decades, prevented by authority (usually through bullying) from doing what their consciences tell them is the right thing to do.  They are forced, year in and year out, to do what they think is, if not outright wrong, at least inferior to what could be done with a little leeway and compassion.   They are in a perpetual bind, caught between the desire to be a good member of the presbyterate and one with the bishop, while knowing that they can’t stand your “rightful aspirations”, as John Paul II called them.

[…]


I’ve been in contact with priests who are ready to take early retirement if their bishops clamp down on the TLM.  Let the bishop figure out how to replace him in the parish when there are hardly any vocations.  Watch the contributions dry up.

I’ve been in contact with seminarians, and prospective seminarians, who are really anxious, because they think that they are going to be denied their heritage that they have grown up in, many of them, or have come to love.

I’ve been in contact with lay people, parents of young families, who are really concerned about what they are going to do, are worried about their priests.

So much pain for nothing.   Moral injury for nothing.  Particularly because, I suspect, Traditionis custodes is going to fail in the long run.

Who is it again who is causing division?  At least the Motu Proprio made who is on which side clearer.

The fact is only a tiny fraction of Catholics who desire Tradition have any sort of serious qualm about Vatican II or doubt the validity of the Novus Ordo.  This is an artificial problem only in the fever-swamp imagination of progressivists, modernists who think that their goal might be in sight: turn the Church into an NGO.

I invite you all, please, to take part in this Custodes Traditionis project.    HERE

Please give that some prayerful consideration.

Today I read about a US bishop who has forbidden priests to say the Traditional Mass PRIVATELY.

Really?

When you lack the sort of power that bishops have to inflict whatever they want, will to power, you have to use those vectors of power that are open to every believer: prayer, fasting, works of mercy for the sake of opening the hearts of those who are imposing their unnecessary restrictions, so very contrary to the spirit of the Church’s interpretation of law.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Cancelled Priests, Priests and Priesthood, The future and our choices, Traditionis custodes | Tagged ,
6 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 543, etc.

In chess news… it seems there is to be a merger of chess.com and Magnus Carlsen’s group of companies (e.g., Chessable, Chess24, New in Chess).

Chess.com has, already, some 90 million members who play some 10 million games a day.

On 24 August 1972 in Reykjavík, Iceland, Game 18 ended in a three-fold repetition. However, the Icelandic Chess Federation put police guards on a 24 hour watch around the playing site and roped off the area. The Science Institute of Iceland was brought in to examine everything, lighting, the chairs, etc. There had been an accusation that the Americans were using some sort of technology to undermine Spassky’s ability to play. The entire lighting canopy was dismantled, reveals the amazing discovery of two dead flies. The electromagnetic field around the playing area was measured. The chairs were X-rayed for devices. It was found that Fischer’s chair was set higher, because Fischer was four inches taller than Spassky. However, the X-ray of Spassky’s chair found a strange metal object inside. Carpenters and investigators were summoned. Witnesses were gathered. The chair was dismantled. They discovered a hole in a part of the wooden interior. The company that made the chair said that sometimes they patched the plywood interior with a wood filler that had some metal. Was it radioactive? Was it toxic? But the patch was … gone! A search was undertaken to find the wood filler patch. No joy. The match proceeded without certainty as to the location of the missing wood filler patch.

As it turns out, one of the policemen had found and pocketed the patch. He wrote an article about it with a photo some twenty years later.

Behold the patch.

White to move and win.

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on Daily Rome Shot 543, etc.

Daily Rome Shot 542, etc.

Guess what he just saw!

And please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.  US HERE – UK HERE

By 23 August 1972, the controversy about the American use of technology against the Spassky is still simmering.  BUT… there will be steps taken.  Stay tuned.

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

Black to move and win.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

If there were a “Woken Inquisition”…

… it would be run by Jesuits… and couple of babylonian Franciscans… and a couple of cardinals.

Never mind that the characters look like women in this video.  That’s just a trick of your un-woked habits.  This is actually what Jesuits and those others are like on the inside, which is trying to come out.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
6 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 541, etc.

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE

On 22 August 1972, in the “Match of the Century” World Champ Boris Spassky sat down with the white pieces across from Bobby Fischer, who proceeded to play the Pirc Defense for the first time in his career. Game 17 resulted in a draw by repetition at move 45. However, on the morning of the 17th Game, the Soviet teams Efrem Geller issued a public statement saying that the Americans were using some sort of technology to put Spassky off of his game. Geller asserted that it was all part of a plot: the complaints about the venue, noise, cameras, rows, boards, etc. Game 17 fueled the fire. Fischer claimed the draw by repetition of position. However, Spassky could be argued to have had a material advantage, being up two rooks against Fischer’s rook and knight. Something was bound to happen, one supposes. Fischer had pretty much been a jerk since before the match started. Spassky, on the other hand, had been calm and a real gentleman. Victor Korchnoi quipped in regard to Spassky, that being a gentleman might win the ladies, but it doesn’t win chess games. The technology attack claim by the Soviets would escalate and soon become the focus of the world.

White to move.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

22 August: Immaculate Heart and Queenship of Mary

When the angel Gabriel came to Mary he told her that her Son would have the throne of David and that His kingdom would have no end (Luke 1:32-33).

In ancient Israel, the mothers of the House of David’s kings were crowned, addressed as Gebirah, “Great Lady”. They sat beside the throne of their royal sons.

Since our Lord is our King, then His Mother is our Queen.

On 22 August we observe, in the traditional Roman calendar, the Feast of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.  In the newer calendar it will be the Queenship of the Blessed Virgin Mary.

Mary’s Queenship is intimately tied to the Kingship of her Son.

Her Immaculate Heart beats in harmony with His Sacred Heart, for she conceived her King within her Heart, before she carried Him below her Heart.

  • Did you know that the hearts of mothers and their unborn babies tend to beat with synchronization?
  • Did you know that mothers and their babies hearts will swiftly synchronize when they smile at each other?

Imagine, for a moment, the smiles of Mary and Jesus as they regard each other.  Try to picture that.

Their hearts beat as one.

Her Queenship rests not on her own merits alone, but rather it rests upon the majesty of her divine Son.

At the conclusion of Dante’s Divina Commedia St Bernard sings of Heaven’s Queen that she is the “daughter of her Son”. But she will always remain, as Saint Thérèse observed, “more Mother than Queen”.

In addressing Mary, we name her Queen in many prayers, such as the Salve, Regina. We invoke her in the Litany of Loreto as Queen of Angels, Patriarchs, Prophets, Apostles, Martyrs, Confessors, Virgins, All Saints and, so important these days, Families.  St John Paul, taking stock of our times, added that last title to the Litany in 1995.  She is the Queen conceived without original sin, assumed into Heaven, Queen of the Most Holy Rosary and Queen of Peace.

May I suggest, dear readers, that you offer your day to the King of Fearful Majesty through our Queen’s intercession?  I ask also a prayer for myself.

O my God, in union with the Immaculate Heart of Mary, I offer Thee the Precious Blood of Jesus from all the altars throughout the world, joining with It the offering of my every thought, word, and action of this day. O my Jesus, I desire today to gain every indulgence and merit I can and I offer them, together with myself, to Mary Immaculate, that she may best apply them in the interests of Thy Most Sacred Heart. Precious Blood of Jesus, save us! Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us! Sacred Heart of Jesus, have mercy on us!

Posted in Our Solitary Boast |
Comments Off on 22 August: Immaculate Heart and Queenship of Mary

Daily Rome Shot 540, μολὼν λαβέ, etc.

Fifty years ago, what was up in Reykjavík? Not much having to do with chess. Fischer wrote a snarky letter to the match’s arbiter Lothar Schmid, threatening not to play anymore unless his demands were met. Fischer was demanding that three more rows of seats be removed. Efrem Geller, of Spassky’s team, countered that five rows be put back. The Americans said Fischer wouldn’t play if they were put back. The Soviets said that Spassky wouldn’t play if they weren’t. The Solomonic decision was made to put the rows back but not to let anyone sit in them!

Meanwhile, white to move.  Think deflection and mate in 4.

Some of you have asked for food posts.  I’ve been mainly living on sandwiches these days.  However, this morning I treated myself to a couple of sunny eggs and coffee from the Canons of St. John Cantius, who recently sent me a pound.  Apparently, the sale of Nicaraguan beans helped the farmers built a chicken coop.

You will notice that I am using a cuillère à sauce individuelle about which I have written HERE.  This is just about the perfect instrument for eggs with runny yolks.  In the back ground is some of my backwardism merch, a page of the Roman Canon with the iconic phrase of Leonidas at Thermopylae in 480 BC as recounted by Herodotus: μολὼν λαβέ… molṑn labé.  Literally, with that aorist participle and imperative, “having come, take!”, or, “Come and take them!”, as a defiant response to the demand of the Persian invader Xerxes that the Spartans surrender their weapons.

Speaking of backwardism, I was struck by something in the Office of Matins today that I hadn’t paid attention to over the years.  In the 2nd psalm of the Office, Ps 2:

Ant. Serve ye the Lord * with fear: and rejoice unto him with trembling.
Psalm 2 [2]
2:1 Why have the Gentiles raged, * and the people devised vain things?
2:2 The kings of the earth stood up, and the princes met together, * against the Lord and against his Christ.
2:3 Let us break their bonds asunder: * and let us cast away their yoke from us.
2:4 He that dwelleth in heaven shall laugh at them: * and the Lord shall deride them.
2:5 Then shall he speak to them in his anger, * and trouble them in his rage.
2:6 But I am appointed king by him over Sion his holy mountain, * preaching his commandment.
2:7 The Lord hath said to me: * Thou art my son, this day have I begotten thee.
2:8 Ask of me, and I will give thee the Gentiles for thy inheritance, * and the utmost parts of the earth for thy possession.
2:9 Thou shalt rule them with a rod of iron, * and shalt break them in pieces like a potter’s vessel.
2:10 And now, O ye kings, understand: * receive instruction, you that judge the earth.
2:11 Serve ye the Lord with fear: * and rejoice unto him with trembling.
2:12 Embrace discipline, lest at any time the Lord be angry, * and you perish from the just way.
2:13 When his wrath shall be kindled in a short time, * blessed are all they that trust in him.
V. Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, * and to the Holy Ghost.
R. As it was in the beginning, is now, * and ever shall be, world without end. Amen.

Ant. Serve ye the Lord with fear: and rejoice unto him with trembling.

Servíte Dómino * in timóre, et exsultáte ei cum tremóre.

Ya’ll serve the Lord in fear, and, with trembling, rejoice in Him.

How perfectly this line exemplifies the dynamic of the Christian soul enveloped in the action of sacred liturgical worship.

In our Catholic worship we seek an encounter with something transformative.  We are ultimately driven to seek this transformation by the growing realization of the absolute certainty of our judgment, preceded inevitably by death.   Because of our baptism we can participate in the sacred mysteries, to which we are inexorably drawn in holy fear and joyful trembling, awe at transcendence, as William James would say.  The more we come to our liturgical rites with full, conscious and active participation, the more we are aware of the transformative mystery we are touched by as being tremendum et fascinans, to borrow the language of Rudolph Otto, “tremble inducing and yet alluring”.  This is the very stuff of religion.

I think the Vetus Ordo helps us to this point better than the Novus Ordo, particularly because the Vetus does not deemphasize the Four Last Things.  It does not obscure the Passion in its emphasis on the Resurrection.

Just a rapid thought.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
3 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes: 11th Sunday after Pentecost (N.O. 21st Sunday)

Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all. Share the good stuff.

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at your Mass of obligation for the 11th Sunday after Pentecost (21th Ordinary in the Novus)?

Tell about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass.  I hear that it is growing.  Of COURSE.

Any local changes or (hopefully good) news?

A few thoughts of my own, HERE.

This Sunday’s Gospel Has a Word that “Sums up the Whole Message and the Whole Work of Christ.”

In medias res…

[…]

Then Jesus looked up to Heaven and “sighed” and said “Ephphatha.” He didn’t talk to the Father or pray with words. He “sighed a deep sigh,” stenazo, “to groan,” which suggests the deep compassion with which the Eternal Word held the man who, all his life, had been cut off without words from his fellow men. That Christ was especially moved by this man’s plight is suggested in their going apart and the speechless sigh, which “said it all” a quiet uttering of the ruach, the Spirit.

I mentioned Greek, but we are perhaps distracted by that flashy “Ephphatha.” In Greek, Mark uses the verb dianoigo, “be opened,” dianoíxtheti in the aorist passive imperative form… 2nd person singular: “let you be opened.” Jesus didn’t command the ears and mouth to be opened, He commanded the man to be opened. As a result, “his ears were opened, his tongue was released, and he spoke plainly” (v. 35).

[…]

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
7 Comments

Sins of the tongue

My post for the 11th Sunday after Pentecost, at One Peter Five, “This Sunday’s Gospel Has a Word that “Sums up the Whole Message and the Whole Work of Christ”” begins with a digression.

Because the Gospel for this 11th Sunday after Pentecost concerns the miraculous healing of a man’s deafness and inability to talk, before I drill into the Sunday passage and risk losing most of you because I go on and on and on, let me offer this from the top.

St. Gregory Nazianzen (+390) says that half of all vices may be charged to the account of the tongue. It would be better for many persons to have no tongue and to be unable to talk from their birth, for then they would be miserable only for this life, whereas owing to the sins of their tongue they plunge themselves into eternal damnation. Talk not inconsiderately, but bear in mind that you have to give an account of every idle word you speak.

How many sins could we avoid, if we would bridle our tongues! Or, rather, sheath them. The 17th c. Protestant preacher Thomas Brooks (+1680) said, our tongues can be likened to three fatal weapons, a razor, a sword and an arrow: the tongue slashes reputations, wounds deeply and can strike from afar. By our speech we reveal our inner selves to others. Thus, Brooks:

When the Pumpe goes you may quickly know whether the water that is in the Fountain or Well, be clear or muddy, sweet or stinking; and when the clapper strikes, you may soon guess of what mettal the Bell is made of: and so by mens tongues you may easily guess what is in their hearts; if the tongue be vil’d, the heart is so; if the tongue be bloody, the heart is so; if the tongue be adulterous, the heart is so; if the tongue be malicious, the heart is so; if the tongue be covetous, the heart is so; and if the tongue be cruel, the heart is so, &c. Mens minds are known by their mouthes; if the mouth be bad, the mind is not good; he that is rotten in his talk, is commonly rotten in the heart. Of all the members of the body, there is none so serviceable to Satan as an evil tongue….

With that in mind, I proceed in my weekly task invoking St. Francis de Sales, who wrote:

“I wish I had buttons on both lips [hands?], which I should be obliged to unfasten when I had an occasion to speak [write?], for I should then gain more time to reflect, and to consider.”

Let us now consider together the context of this Sunday’s Holy Mass and its readings.

Even as he warns against assuming conscious organization of the themes of Sundays of Ordered Time after Pentecost, the great commentator of the 20th century Liturgical Movement Pius Parsch suggests that…

[…]

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 |
3 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 539, etc.

Fifty years ago today, in Reykjavík, Game 16 took place between Bobby Fischer and Boris Spassky. Fischer brought the Ruy Lopez to the board. They played to a draw by move 34. However, Spassky prolonged the game to move 60 as psychological torture. It ended in the inevitable draw.  Fischer is winning in the match, of course.

Did you know that the common opening called the Ruy Lopez, aka The Spanish Game, is named after a priest? Ruy López de Segura (+1580 at only 50 years old). In Rome, for dealings with Pius IV (Medici), he learned to play chess. “When in Rome…”. He apparently read Damiano da Odemira’s book about chess and, being unimpressed, penned his own. Later, my favorite chess guys, the Modenese Masters, including Fr. Ponziani, thought rather little of his writings. However, in his time, López beat everyone alive. You can see some of his games HERE.

In any event, you might say a “Hail, Mary” for the repose of the soul of Fr. Ruy López de Segura.  Priests need prayers, living and dead. I hope you will pray for me, living and dead.

Click!
There’s a back story, too.

Back story HERE. It’s about you.

Here’s a painting by Luigi Mussini of the Spanish Court and Fr. Ruy López de Segura playing chess.

The dogs have been shown the consistory list by their cruel mistress and her conniving maid.

Your use of my Amazon link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.  US HERE – UK HERE

I created a search link at wdtprs dot com slash shop dot htm

Enter anything and search.  You might get a window that “The information you’re about to submit is not secure”. Ignore that and “send anyway”.

Finally, in honor of the long lost Semper Gumby, there’s THIS.

Which leads to this.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment