On this Feast of St. Luke… books!

I herewith prompt the readership to consider reading the following.

First, Theophilos: A Novel

by Michael D. O’Brien

This explores a theme O’Brien seems fond of: a father searching for his son. The Theophilos in question is mentioned in the New Testament. We don’t know who he is. So, this novel. In this fictional narrative, Theophilos is the skeptical but beloved adoptive father of St. Luke. Challenged by the startling account of the “Christos” received in the chronicle from his beloved son Luke and concerned for the newly zealous young man’s fate, Theophilos, a Greek physician and an agnostic, embarks on a search for Luke to bring him home.

Next, Dear and Glorious Physician: A Novel About Saint Luke

by Taylor Caldwell

This is a pretty well-known book by an excellent author.   I will slip in another truly delightful book by her:

Grandmother And The Priests

In 1904, a little girl is shipped off to the house of her wealthy Irish grandmother in Leeds.  The widow’s relationship with the Church is strained, but she retains a great respect and affection for priests.  She regularly invites groups of priests poor and well off, of the city or of the country, to dine at her fine table.  Her requirement is story-telling.  The priests are to tell a story, which the spellbound girl overhears and remembers.

The Stories…

  • Monsignor Harrington-Smith and the Dread Encounter
  • Father MacBurne and the Doughty Chieftain
  • Father Hughes and the Golden Door
  • Father Ifor Lewis and the Men of Gwenwynnlynn
  • Father Donahue and the Shadow of Doubt
  • Father Padraic Brant and the Pale
  • Father Alfred Ludwin and the Demon Lady
  • Father Thomas Weir and the Problem of Virtue
  • Father Shayne and the Problem of Evil
  • Father Daniel O’Connor and the Minstrel Boy
  • Bishop Quinn and Lucifer

 

 

Posted in REVIEWS, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged ,
1 Comment

ROME 25/10 – Day 20: BANNED!

  7:23 and 18:28 and 18:45

In the traditional calendar it is the Feast of St. Margaret Mary Alacoque, the Visitandine who received the messages of the Most Sacred Heart.

Welcome Registrants:

tz123
wzphl5
Luke

Yesterday I treated myself to something fun to take home and frame.  This is an official ban in Rome on certain prohibited games of chance issued on 24 February 1730.

The interesting thing about it is that it was issued between Popes (who were the secular rulers of the Papal States).

It is sede vacante at this moment!  This is sure to make a certain reader’s socks roll up and down.

With this ban, we are 3 days after the death of Benedict XIII (Orsini – instantly recognizable portraits). Clement XII (Corsini) will be elected on 12 July 1730 (until 6 February 1740).

When it is sede vacante almost all curial offices cease except, notably, that of the Cardinal Camerlegno who handles affairs in the meantime.

Benedict XIII

It being the case, public peace was recognized as being disturbed by the outcry and extermination of poor families due to the Games previously prohibited by other General and specific Proclamations; Therefore, the Most Illustrious and Most Reverend Monsignor Giovanni Battista Spinola of Rome, and his General District Governor, and Vice-Camerlengo, by express order and the Most Reverend Lords Cardinals, Heads of Orders, and of the Most Eminent and Most Reverend Lord Cardinal Camerlengo with the present public Proclamation, confirming in all and for all the other Proclamations, both General and particular, issued on the prohibition of games, as if they were recorded here word for word, orders and commands that no person, even if he holds a public, military or Justice office, plays or causes to be played the prohibited games of Fortune, Lotto, Lauca, Biribis, Torretta, Girello, Rissa, Cards, Dice, or other similar games, nor retains or causes to be played any kind of the aforementioned Games, or of a public or secret gambling den in any place, even in the Guardhouse or any other place, notwithstanding any abuse or toleration to the contrary, under penalty of ten years’ imprisonment for the gambling den owner and anyone who attends on his behalf in lieu of the aforementioned games, and for seven years’ imprisonment for those who play at the galleys, and of the loss of any money or property found in the game. Those who happen to be there will be considered idle and vagabonds and will incur the penalty of five years’ imprisonment, even if they were simple spectators or if they happened to arrive at the said games. His Most Illustrious Lordship reserves the right to declare, whatever the gambling den, taking into account the quality of the persons, the place, and the manner of gambling. Warning everyone that the aforementioned penalties will be carried out in all and each of the aforementioned cases without exception, including ex officio, and by inquisition, and in any other manner beneficial to the Court and the Treasury. And it is desired that this Proclamation, posted in the usual places in Rome, immediately bind everyone, as if it had been personally notified. Given in Rome this 24th February 1730.

So there!

I am pretty sure that at this time this ban would also have covered chess, but probably only for clergy. For some time chess was banned as a game of chance because from the 11th-14th centuries dice were somehow used. For clergy and religious, chess was prohibited, but this was often violated famously by St. Teresa of Avila, whose Feast we just celebrated and whose face we just saw on this blog. St. Teresa uses chess imagery in her Interior Castle and she is generally accounted to be the Patron Saint of Chess Players. In the time period of the ban, however, we have the Modenese Masters, Domenico Lorenzo Ponziani (1719–96), Ercole del Rio (1718–1802), and Giambattista Lolli (1698–1769).  In 1764 Ponziani was ordained a priest and became Vicar General of Modena in 1784 and was made a Protonotary Apostolic.

NB: I warmly recommend this book, especially to my fellow priests.  But everyone would benefit.  IT. IS. SIMPLY. AMAZING. … if you use it!

US HERE– UK HERE

In other chessy news, my guy Wesley So – on his day off from the US Chess Championship in St. Louis –  beat in overtime the up and coming German youth Vincent Keymer in the Speed Chess Championship 2025.  It was really close.  Keymer won the last bullet game on demand forcing the tie breaks which Wesley won.   The next pairing in the SCC will be Hikaru Nakamura and Liem Le, will be on Friday, October 17 at 11:00 a.m. ET / 17:00 CEST / 8:30 p.m. IST.

If you have a couple minutes, this is mesmerizing.  I’d like to see it updated.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

WAY TOO COOL!

I met in the street outside The Parish™ after Mass a couple just arrived in The City.  They recognized me.  Among the things discussed were my food posts.  I like sharing them with you when they are good.  However, since I restrict my budget and am extremely stingy (I must pay rent here whether I am here or not) I cut corners.  Today, that was a bad idea.  Let’s just say that the store-bought vegetable soup that needed heating, really needed the toilet, which is where it went.

Supper leaving me quite hungry, therefore, brought on a bought of spaghetti with onion, tomato with lots of pepperoncino, tuna and capers.   Alas my use of scissors for the parsley did in the scissors and the wine did in the cheap extractor.  Grrr.

Latin for cork screw is “extraculum“.  Really.  It is.

Sigh.

Buy some beer and make the monks happy.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
4 Comments

Do you miss him yet?

Each and every day.

My ordaining bishop.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
9 Comments

Look at this carefully.

Look at this carefully.

I wonder if the gap isn’t even wider now.

UPDATE:

Please note the first comment HERE

UPDATE:

In reference to a short-sighted commentator, below.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, The future and our choices |
15 Comments

ROME 25/10 – Day 19: Yum

7:22 saw the sun rise here in Rome.

18:29 will see the sunset.

18:45 won’t hear the Ave Maria Bell that is supposed to ring.

It is the 289th day of the civil year. There are 77 days left.

Advent, with a new liturgical year, begins in 45 days.

Before anything else, I’ll alert you to the audio of a  spiritual conference by a friend of mine. “Saint Teresa of Avila’s
Nine Stages of Prayer” It is by Fr. Cliff Ermatinger.  HERE 

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HERE – UK HERE  WHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance (massively hiked for this new year of surprises), utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

This box of onions gives me great pleasure.  I’m a simple guy.

I got flowers yesterday from Pippo at the Campo de’ Fiori.  There always plenty to do there and they have abundant help.

While at the Campo, I got some pizza bianca and mortadella with black truffle.

I know you have been on pins and needles.

At the 2025 U.S. Chess Championship on going in St. Louis the unlikeable Hans Niemann won a dramatic game against Sam Shankland in round four. He joins Fabiano Caruana and Levon Aronian in second place on 2.5/4, half a point behind leader Wesley So. Niemann’s was the only win before the rest day, after Awonder Liang and Grigoriy Oparin missed clear chances against Andy Woodward and Ray Robson respectively.

Black to move and mate in 4.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
5 Comments

“The Unspoken Trial of the Orphaning of Our Priests”

There is a good/bad article at Crisis about the situation priests are in the USA.

It is almost 6000 words… hard words.  Here is a summary.  In short, the piece opens with Crisis Magazine editor Eric Sammons’ call for calm amid Pope Leo XIV’s controversial gestures (e.g., ice chunk) and his promotion of Cardinal Cupich. The author agrees but insists that beneath such scandals lies a deeper and more destructive spiritual crisis: a widespread “priestly anti-fatherhood” among bishops.

Across the American Church, priests increasingly experience their bishops not as spiritual fathers but as distant bureaucrats. Or worse, as punitive figures. This absence of fatherly care has left countless priests demoralized, isolated, and spiritually adrift. Many suffer quietly from anger, depression, or fear of episcopal reprisal. Their weakened priestly witness, in turn, has hollowed parish life, confused the faithful, and accelerated the Church’s decline, especially among the young.

The problem, the author contends, is systemic. Episcopal appointments reward conformity and institutional maintenance rather than prophetic courage. Bishops replicate themselves, perpetuating a culture of self-preservation.  [And we know the particular proclivities they’ve sought to promote from within.] A 2022 Catholic University survey revealed that three-quarters of U.S. priests do not trust their bishops. This is evidence of the deep breach in ecclesial fatherhood.

The essay contrasts today’s cautious administrators with St. John Vianney, the tireless Curé of Ars, whose ascetic love for souls has fallen out of favor. It also invokes prophetic voices: the fourth-century theologian Tyconius, who foresaw a Church divided between true and false shepherds, and Fulton Sheen, who warned of a counterfeit “anti-Church” resembling the real one but emptied of God.  The “ape”.

Yet the author concludes not in despair but in exhortation. The laity, he urges, must respond with intensified prayer, fasting, and personal support for priests—offering friendship, hospitality, and encouragement to those wounded by episcopal neglect. True renewal of the Church, he argues, will come only when the fatherhood of God is once again reflected in the spiritual fatherhood of bishops and priests, restored through love, sacrifice, and supernatural faith.

That was a summary.  Here I have shamelessly lifted the first part … with emphases and comments.

The Unspoken Trial of the Orphaning of Our Priests
A type of bishopric anti-fatherhood has led countless priests in America to live out vocations tainted by fear, torment, and silent despair.

by Kevin Wells.

Crisis editor Eric Sammons? has made written ?and spoken pleas for laity calm in the aftermath of Pope Leo XIV’s odd ice-block blessing and refusal to condemn Cardinal ?Blase Cupich’s decision to award a pro-abortion politician with a lifetime achievement honor. ?Even on gasket-blowing days like yesterday, when the Chicago-native pontiff promoted his fellow Chicagoan Cupich to the Pontifical Commission for the Vatican City State?, Sammons’ call for calm is as wise as it is necessary.

But why?

The Roman Catholic Church is facing a spiritual epidemic unlike any it has ever known; it is as large—and mostly unrecognized —as any crisis in today’s American Catholic Church: Beneath the weight of what might best be described as a priestly anti-fatherhood episcopate—bishops who relate to their priests not as spiritual fathers, but as absent or even abusive ones—countless priests in America are left to live their vocations in silent despair.  [My experience and that of many priests I know bears this out.]

Burdened by anger, isolation, depression, and the tormenting fear of episcopal reprisal, countless priests’ joy has been stolen away, leaving behind only shadows of the men they once prayed and hoped to become.

The spiritual orphaning of dutiful and once-vibrant priests can’t be measured, but its consequences are unmistakable: It has crippled the Church from within by accelerating the exodus of Catholics over the past fifteen years, including countless millions of the Church’s youth, who have fled the Faith and now dwell in a secularized and changing world where God seems to be vanishing.

The Catholic laity who remain are often left to receive the sacraments and transmission of the Faith from enfeebled and spiritually-drained spiritual fathers. This weakening of priests has not gone unnoticed. The diminished witness of parish priests has sown confusion among the faithful, many of whom have grown weary of the pattern and drift toward more vibrant Christian communities, adding another log to the fire of the Catholic Church’s increasingly uncertain future.

Though the depth, scale, and consistency of this reality have inflicted incalculable harm on the Church, its mechanisms—apart from the intervention of God—are immovable, dyed indelibly into the fabric of ecclesial structure and governance. [See how good the Enemy is at being an enemy?] Although bishops are appointed by the pope, the process that precedes the appointments all but ensures that only “company men” are elevated; men who will not disturb the status quo or rock the boat. In effect, bishops replicate themselves.

To be sure, there are good and fatherly bishops in America (and many priests quietly decline episcopal appointments) [I hear that this is more and more the case.] but those who rise to the rank of bishop almost always lack the courage to speak prophetically about the sin and sordidness infiltrating both culture and Church. Those rare bishops who stray from the script are swiftly sidelined or punished.

Despite the startling indictment of their leadership in 2022, when more than three-quarters of American priests reported they did not trust their bishop (Catholic Project, The Catholic University of America) episcopal paternal abuse has deepened. It now extends beyond rectories and stretches into various diocesan departments, universities, and the like, where bishops have rebuked, dismissed, or mandated sweeping overhauls of faithful lay apostolates and initiatives, often with little explanation.

[…]

It is priests, however, who suffer most under the weight of the pervasive paternal abuse. It is perhaps the largest and least-known crisis in the Church today. Diocese by diocese, countless priests wake each morning knowing they do not have the backing of their spiritual father[Yeah. ]

Instead, many have come to view their bishop as distant and indifferent to their priestly work—a father whom they’ve come to regard as absentee and consumed with diocesan governance, whose only contact will likely be punitive, where, for example, a priest might be summoned to the chancery in response to a parishioner’s complaint about a homily clarifying Church teaching on contraception, homosexuality, or gender. Countless priests have left these meetings forever changed.  [Often threatened with being sent to places like St. Luke’s for psychological evaluation and eventual drugging and retooling.]

“I know priests who have vomited in bathrooms after meetings,” a priest said. “Other priests live out vocations haunted by their bishop’s threats. Most bishops seem to be attracted to their authority and power rather than the authority of Christ. They forget that they, too, were once priests.

Priests today believe there is no institutional support, where when an issue arises, their bishop will almost always side with the laity. The irony, of course, is that bishops so often speak of ‘accompaniment.’ Catholics are urged over and over to accompany the immigrant, LGBT community, the poor, and those on the margins, but priests feel that their bishop has not only not accompanied them, but has mostly orphaned them.”

Before McCarrick’s [How many of the recent bishops appointed have their pedigree in one of his creations?] handling of the aftermath of my uncle Msgr. Thomas Wells’ rectory murder in 2000—when, as the newly appointed Archbishop of Washington, he issued a letter urging priests not to attend the murder trial—I had no concept of the widespread ascendency of spiritual abandonment priests were beginning to endure at the hands of their bishops.

Now, 25 years later, as a journalist and Catholic author who has spoken with hundreds of priests, I know far more than I ever wished to about this pattern of episcopal desertion—what amounts to an almost encyclopedic knowledge of wounds passed from father to son. Much of it has come unsolicited, shared off the record by priests, theologians, lay faithful, a handful of truly fatherly bishops, and even exorcists. I have written and spoken about it over the years, believing that exposing darkness to the light might help expel it. But as time has passed, I have only witnessed this paternal abuse grow more entrenched.

I know priests who daily choke back seething anger. I know of others who, shaped by the neglect of their bishops, have admitted to having to fight to refrain from becoming emotionally abusive themselves. Others have not been able to prevent their hardening, so whether it’s the moment of the epiclesis or their presence beside the Easter Vigil pyre, their faces have become unreadable to their parishioners.

Because so many bishops have failed to father well, entire constellations of American priests have drifted into worldliness—filling their lives with distractions, social indulgences, and nonreligious entertainment. Increasingly, they live what might be called bachelor priesthoods, unmoored from their sacrificial identity to become like Christ, the Slaughtered Lamb. As a result, many parishioners perceive them as being as wedded to the world as they are to the Bride of Christ.

Deprived of fraternal correction and true paternal guidance, these priests are left to navigate their vocations alone, where they begin to live out softened lives. Their addiction to the narcotic of comfort has dulled their prophetic voice and weakened their willingness to pour themselves out as victims for the souls entrusted to them. One striking example: I’ve been told of priests who scroll through their phones while penitents confess their sins[LOL.  Yeah… I’ve been on the receiving end of that one.  And when I noticed it, my next words were… “I see you have your phone.  Listen here, sonny, I’ve been a priest for over 30 years.  Turn it off.  Never bring it in here again. …”.  (Wherein I explained some things.)  He also got the form of absolution wrong, which set me off again.]

A universe of priests play video games, scour social media streams, and watch cable and Netflix late into the night, comforted by the knowledge that their weekday Mass doesn’t begin until 9:30 a.m., allowing them to sleep in. These priests, though, perhaps forget, or deliberately ignore, their early-rising, workaday flock who are denied access to the Eucharist after rising at dawn. Among these are countless young Catholic professionals, many of whom long for the Eucharist as spiritual medicine to help them in workplaces and a culture that increasingly resembles an expanding Babylon.   [It sure would be a help to have more priests willing, for example, to say a 30 minute Low Mass, at, say 6:30 AM.  No?  Am I wrong?  This could be the subject of a poll.]

Bishops’ anti-fatherhood has given rebirth to priests’ deep and long-buried father wounds, those who grew up unloved by their earthly fathers. These priests will often diagnose their spiritual father’s absence of affirmation, fraternal charity, and periodic check-ins as pointing to doubts about their worth, where feelings of paternal rejection reemerge.

Fatherlessness has even caused same-sex attracted priests—who nobly had strived to offer their desire as a chaste sacrifice to lay at Jesus’ feet on the day of their judgment—to give in to temptation, no longer believing they are held in love by any father, divine or earthly.

While fatherly bishops do still exist, it is increasingly rare for one to routinely check in on his priests—to ask about their prayer life, their spiritual reading, or to offer a word of affirmation for a parish-galvanizing initiative, a new ministry, or a surge in OCIA numbers. Even a priest’s hard-won victories and long slogs are often met with silence[In one sense, the priest shouldn’t do things for the sake of praise from the bishop.  That smacks also of “scarlet fever”.  But priests are human beings.  Some recognition, like a little water on a plant, goes a long way.  True leaders know about this.]

For example, a pastor who labors to gather a few hundred devoted parishioners to fulfill a long-held hope of opening a perpetual adoration chapel will be unlikely to hear from his bishop, even if his effort is known at the chancery. [Want positive vibes from the bishop, Father?  Start a monthly “queer-the-church” liturgy, or a drag queen hour for kids.] Even pastors who have significantly grown their parish, increased weekly collections, and earned a reputation as a magnanimous shepherd anchored to long days in prayer, pastoral work, and sacrificial service are unlikely to be acknowledged.

Rarely will a priest be treated to a coffee or meal by his bishop, where together they could have shot the breeze about their families, upbringing, and childhood memories or could have discussed their spiritual lives and favorite saints—where a bishop could have passed along to his spiritual son hard-earned pastoral wisdom, spiritual and theological insights, and leadership or homiletic pointers.  [Priests don’t generally want to or need to be taken out for an ice-cream cone, as if it is the court-set visitation day.   But they would appreciate something other than the cold turning away of the face.]

Each year, hundreds of young men enter seminary in America, driven by a desire to become holy priests—spiritual fathers, truth-tellers, and dutiful shepherds for the souls they hope to one day pastor. It is not difficult to imagine that each one carries a quiet hope that his bishop will resemble an icon of the Good Shepherd—someone who will guide, support, and inspire him to become a faithful, dependable, and perhaps even holy priest.

But too often, those hopes crash against the rocky shorelines of chanceries consumed by socially driven initiatives, synodal consultations, and the bleak machinery of bankruptcies, lawsuits, parish closures, and rushed clustering models. These once-bright-eyed young men are rushed into parishes and dioceses—already stretched thin and spiritually hollowed—where they quickly find themselves left largely to fend for themselves with little pastoral guidance and mentorship. Over time, some begin to feel like chattel.

[…]

There is quite a bit more.

Fr. McTeigue has good videos about priests.  For example HERE  And he has a fundraiser going on.

 

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Priests and Priesthood, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
16 Comments

“There has never been anything like this in history; in doing this we are despising and proscribing the Church’s whole past.”

I saw the quote on twitter, but it was without a citation. I did some digging:

“For fostering a true consciousness in liturgical matters, it is also important that the proscription against the form of liturgy in valid use up to 1970 [the older Latin Mass] should be lifted. Anyone who nowadays advocates the continuing existence of this liturgy or takes part in it is treated like a leper; all tolerance ends here. There has never been anything like this in history; in doing this we are despising and proscribing the Church’s whole past. How can one trust her at present if things are that way?”

Joseph Ratzinger, God and the World: A Conversation with Peter Seewald (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2002), p. 416.

This is precisely right.

However, there are bishops who do despise the Church’s whole past.  They want the past erased and buried.   They want a new morality, especially.   That way they can be popular.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
15 Comments

ROME 25/10 – Day 18: reconstruction of the face of a world changing saint

7:21

18:31

18:45

By now… you know.

Today is the Feast of St. Teresa of Avila (+4 Oct 1582).

Last year I posted – HERE – that the tomb of St. Teresa was opened for examination and her body was found to be incorrupt.  More on that below.

St. Teresa is important for the calendar we now use, the Gregorian Calendar.

In 1582, the ancient Julian calendar (organized by, yes, Julius Caesar and still observed by many Orthodox Christians) officially was terminated on Thursday 4 October by the command of Gregory XIII (1572–1585, Ugo Boncompagni) via the papal bull Inter gravissimas.

At midnight of 3-4 October the calendar skipped automatically to a day named Friday 15 October.

The famed Jesuit mathematician Christopher Clavius (+1612) worked out the calculations for this change.  He chose October for the moment of the jump because it had the fewest feast days.

He also did his calculations without the use of the decimal point!

St. Teresa of Avila died on the very night on which His Holiness had commanded that the calendar shift from 4 October to 15 October, which is why her feast is celebrated on the 15th rather than the 3rd or 4th.

Moreover, St Teresa bumped St. Hedwig from the 15th to the 16th.  I’m sure St. Hedwig didn’t mind, given the circumstances.

St. Teresa is know, of course, for being a reformer of the Carmelites.   Perhaps it is even more important that she is the Patroness of Chess Players… oh yeah… and she’s a Doctor of the Church, which is why she is often depicted with the doctoral biretta.

Welcome Registrant:

OKC Catholic Dad

This month, clergy shirts – 50% off – that includes Clergy Guayabera shirts!

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

Black to move and mate in…?  It’s there!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
2 Comments

Study sheds light on generational divide among US priests – interesting stats, some not surprising but remain revelatory

The Pillar occasionally posts good things of interest, depending on the writer. In this case, Luke Coppen, my former (excellent) editor at the UK’s Catholic Herald posts about priests. Some excerpts with some emphases and comments.

Study sheds light on generational divide among US priests
The National Study of Catholic Priests found younger clergy more likely to be theologically orthodox and politically moderate

[…]

The 2025 National Study of Catholic Priests, the results of which were released Oct. 14, found that younger clergy were more likely to describe themselves as theologically orthodox and politically moderate, to think access to the Traditional Latin Mass should be a priority, to feel lonely, and to believe they are expected to do too many things beyond their priestly calling.  [Fr. McTeigue… paging Fr. McTeigue… please pick up a white Hospitality Phone…]

Younger priests were also less likely to think that synodality should be prioritized and less concerned about the question of women’s influence in the Church than their older peers, according to the study.  [Not sure what that means.  Perhaps they will spin it out.]

The 2025 report follows the groundbreaking 2022 National Study of Catholic Priests, the largest study of U.S. priests for more than 50 years, which concluded that clergy were largely flourishing, despite a deep mistrust of bishops and fears of being falsely accused of abuse [Serious and real, given the massive evidence of how bishops have mistreated priests by not following procedures laid down in canon law and in many other ways.  Priests are justified.]

Further analysis of the results in 2023 found that the share of new U.S. Catholic priests identifying as theologically “progressive” had declined dramatically compared with preceding generations.  [There’s hope.  This probably means also that the newer men are smarter.]

[…]

Some interesting stats between these chunks.

[…]

Only 11% of priests ordained before 1980 said access to the Traditional Latin Mass should be a priority, compared with 20% among those ordained between 1980 and 1999, and 39% among those ordained in the 21st century[Factors.  They didn’t grow up in the halcyon days of Vatican II’s “spirit” hurricaning through the Church.  Now they have to remodel sanctuaries which were wreckovated.  They grew up with good sense from and virility from John Paul II and theological and liturgical depth from Benedict.  Vatican II was a long time ago for them.]

….

Younger priests were also more likely to cite Eucharistic devotion as a priority and less likely than older clergy to emphasize climate change, immigration, the LGBT community, poverty, racism, and social justice.

[…]

After this there are stats about “walking together” and about loneliness, and about what priests are called upon to do in view of possible burn out.

 

Posted in Cancelled Priests, Priests and Priesthood, SESSIUNCULA, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices |
7 Comments

ROME 25/10 – Day 17: fishing

The time of the rising of the sun today was 7:19.

The sun sets at 18:32.

Ave Maria Bell?  18:45

Welcome Registrant:

WmC.Ramsey

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HERE – UK HERE  WHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance (massively hiked for this new year of surprises), utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

Meanwhile, remind you of anything?

We were out to eat tonight in a fairly large group of mostly priests and a few laymen, including our gracious host, a member of the Archconfraternity from Canada who comes to Rome occasionally to take a part.   The supper was very chatty, very much indeed, especially of the incredibly, unprofessionally slow service even for Rome, but the company was exquisite.  Eventually we did order and the food, when it came, was quite good.  A few shots.

You get the idea here.

More of the idea.

Even more of the idea.  From Britany.  #2 I think.

Butter, anchovy and truffle.

Frankly, I could do that one better at home.  But it was good.

My neighbor’s.

I’m not going to bother posting a shot of the fish, which was divided up into pretty small portions and dressed with a touch of olive oil.  Was it good?  Okay, it was good.  It wasn’t that good.

There were at the end a long list of dessert possibilities.  But even as people chose things, they also brought these for everyone, which was more than enough.   The homemade panetone with zabaglione looked GREAT.

They served people ice-cream with one of these:  this is NOT an ice-cream spoon, even though it is mistakenly called that by the ignorant.

 

In chessy news: Wesley So Takes Sole US Championship Lead

There is a lot of chess yet to be played, but that headline pleases me. I was up late to review the coverage. *yawn* Coffee….

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Black to move and mate in 4.

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
14 Comments