o{]:¬)

Fr. Z is Moderator of the Catholic Online Forum and the ASK FATHER Question Box. The WDTPRS columns appear weekly in The Wanderer. Fr. Z lives in Rome, though he is often in the USA. He is available for retreats and conferences. E-mail
LOGIN


   Fr. Z on WDTPRS

↑ Grab this Headline Animator


Recent Posts
  • A Sabine oddity
  • Leaves
  • 11 Oct: Blessed John XXIII
  • UK seminaries: the seminarians are making the difference
  • QUAERITUR: Black pall for caskets in the Novus Ordo?
  • INTERNET PRAYER UPDATE: DANISH
  • QUAERITUR: Assistant priest puts an amice over the surplice
  • TULSA: Vocation of spiritual motherhood for priests

  • Recent Comments:

    • Margaret: I have to ask about the model of phone as well– I’ve had cheap digital cameras that...
    • Martin: I’m not sure from reading the previous comments that the use of a pall is now or has previously been a...
    • Woody Jones: I too am a big fan of Fr. Mark’s blog, which has greatly edifying material. Bishop Slattery is...
    • Maureen: He’s an English priest blogger, and other people call him that because his blog’s named the...
    • dcs: I remember reading somewhere that Pope Paul VI (I believe) abolished two branches of the Holy See’s corps of...
    • Dr. Eric: I’m new here, who is His Hermenuticalness?
    • dcs: http://birds.cornell.edu/pfw/A boutBirdsandFeeding/FAQsBirdFe eding.htm#robins
    • Tony: I hope that everybody who is reading this can *read between the lines* and actually get a picture of what...
    • MPod: “No one can be at the same time a sincere Catholic and a true Socialist.” Pope Pius XI
    • MPod: In thee, O Lord, have I trusted. Let me never be confounded. My sweet Jesus, mercy!

  • VOTE!
    My site was nominated for Best Religion Blog!

    Visit the new WDTPRS Store!
    Buy WDTPRS stuff!

    Calendar

    November 2007
    S M T W T F S
    « Oct   Dec »
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    252627282930  


    Subscribe to ... The Wanderer

    Subscribe to ... The Catholic Herald - UK






    This blog is hosted by

    Joyent


    Thanks for the support!






















    Add to Technorati Favorites

    Add to Google Reader or Homepage

    Add to My AOL

    Subscribe in Bloglines

    Powered by FeedBurner


    Where Fr. Z will be:
  • Upcoming Events:
  • Events
  • 13 November 2007

    Benedict XVI’s nearly unnoticed Letter on St. John Chrysostom: reconciliation of Churches, liturgy, social justice, patristics

    CATEGORY: NAPLAM, SESSIUNCULUM — Fr. John Zuhlsdorf @ 10:53 am

    On 8 November, the Holy See released a letter of Pope Benedict for the 1600th anniversary of the death of St. John Chrysostom, a doctor of the Church of great importance to both the West and the Eastern Churches. 

    The occasion of the letter was a conference being held at the Patristic Institute (and my school) the "Augustinianum".

    This is a "Letter", not a "Message" or a "Discourse".  It is not an "Apostolic Letter".

    It is not too long, but it is one of the best written Letters I have seen for a while.

    This letter is important to WDTPRSers and all Patristibloggers because of its focus on the importance of the Fathers and of liturgy

    There was a CNS story on this letter, which so far has been placed on the Vatican web site only in Italian. Also, for reasons I cannot fathom, the Vatican website does not list it in Latest Updates.  

    This letter is worthy of more attention than it received.  It is certainly worthy of more than the CNS story gave it.  The CNS report, alas, reduced the letter to a few snipets about social justice.  Let us not forget that in Deus caritas est Pope Benedict has taught about the proper relationship of theology/spirituality and social justice.  He did the same for theology/spirituality and liturgical practice in Sacramentum caritatis.  There are logical priorities which make the social justice all Christians are called to practice which give social justice its truly Christian character and which makes concrete action fruitful.

    So, as a service to you, WDTPRS provides the Letter in English translation, which you can download in Word format. Here below I will briefly explain the structure of the letter so that when you read it, you can see what Pope Benedict is really trying to say.


    In the introduction, the Pope refers to increased interest in St. John Chrysostom during the last 100 years.  Popes have always been interested him, but in the last 100 years there has been even more attention. This coincides with a "Patristic renewal".  Notice that Benedict cites his closest predecessors.

    Chrysostom ("golden mouth") is a figure who unites the East and West.  Indeed, and this is one of the things Pope Benedict is trying to say to the East, Chrysostom is a figure for reconciliation between the Churches.  The headline in L’Osservatore Romano when it reported the Letter read "Un vescovo per l’intera chiesa… A bishop for the whole Church."  Chrysostom, in a special way among the Fathers, has been highly venerated by both East and West since his death.  Benedict cites St. Augustine of Hippo (+430) as the first to calls St. John a "Father".  Benedict, as part of his larger "Marshall Plan" for the Church is deeply concerned with reconciliation of the Churches, both within (think of Summorum Pontificum) and more proximately but without, with the separated Eastern Churches.  Reconciliation of the Churches is a building block of this pontificate.  Pope Benedict takes pains to remind everyone in this Letter that St. John Chrysostom with great diplomacy together with the Bishop of Alexandria organized a delegation to Pope Siricius to help resolve the schism of the Church of Antioch.  Chrysostom helped resolve a schism. 

    This act of diplomacy was not isolated from his theology.  It was a concrete gesture that flowed from his teaching.

    Central to St. John’s theology is the Body of Christ.  He takes as his starting point St. Paul’s references to Christ as Head of the Body which is the Church.  St. John develops this Pauline image as a way of insisting on the importance of unity and reconciliation between Christian Churches.  Unity is an imperative because Christ is Head of HIS Body.  Members of the Church are really members of HIS Body, not just a Body or one Body but HIS Body.  This is why the Eucharist is so important for St. John.  The Eucharist both symbolizes and actualizes the unity of the Church’s members in Christ’s Body.  There are therefore deep liturgical consequences (and inevitably also for "social justice").  This is why the Eucahrist must be celebrated with proper preparation and devotion.

    Because our Catholic worship is central to Pope Benedict’s "Marshall Plan", in the Letter he cites St. John writing to St. Basil the Great on liturgy. 

    If nothing else you must read this excerpt from Benedict’s Letter (my emphases):

    St John’s faith in the mystery of the love that binds believers to Christ and to one another led him to express a profound reverence for the Eucharist, a reverence that he fostered in the celebration of the Divine Liturgy, as is demonstrated by the fact that one of the richest expressions of Eastern liturgy bears his name to this day. St John understood that the Divine Liturgy situated the believer spiritually between his life on earth and the heavenly reality which was promised to him by the Lord. He expressed his awe at celebrating these sacred mysteries to St Basil the Great in these words: “For when you see the Lord sacrificed, and laid upon the altar, and the priest standing and praying over the victim, ... can you then think that you are still among men, standing upon the earth? Are you not, on the contrary, straightway transported to heaven …?” These sacred rites, says St John, “are not only marvelous to behold, but transcendent in awe. There stands the priest … bringing down the Holy Spirit, and he prays at length … that grace descending on the sacrifice may thereby enlighten the minds of all and render them more resplendent than silver purified by fire. Who can despise this most awesome mystery?  St John urged this same sense of reverence before the eucharistic mystery on those who heard his preaching: “Reverence now this table from which we all are partakers, Christ, who was slain for us, the victim that is placed thereon.”  John spoke movingly of the sacramental effects of Holy Communion upon believers. “Christ’s blood causes the image of our King to be fresh within us, produces unspeakable beauty, and does not permit the nobleness of our souls to waste away, but waters it continually, and nourishes it.”  For this reason, St John, echoing the Holy Scriptures, insistently and frequently exhorted the faithful to approach the altar of the Lord worthily, “not lightly and … out of custom and form,” but with “sincerity and purity of soul”.  He insisted that interior preparation for Holy Communion should include repentance for one’s sins and gratitude for Christ’s sacrifice on behalf of our salvation. He thus urged the lay faithful to participate fully and devoutly in the rites of the Divine Liturgy and, with this same disposition, to receive Holy Communion. “Let us not, I beg you, slay ourselves by our irreverence, but with awe and purity draw near to it; and when you see it set before you, say to yourself: ‘Because of this Body am I no longer earth and ashes, no longer a prisoner, but free: because of this I hope for heaven, and to receive the good things therein, immortal life, the portion of angels, to converse with Christ’.” 

    There is the key concept: awe at transcendence, the very definition of our involvement in mystery.

    Of course Pope Benedict speaks of St. John on care of the poor.  The writer of the CNS article wasn’t wrong to mention Benedict’s comments on this important theme. This is also part of Chrysostom’s theology and therefeore Benedict’s letter.  However, the real structure of Benedict’s Letter is far more theological and profound. 

    Moreover, and this is one of the immediate and practical points of the Letter and it must not be missed by anyone: the Pope exorts theologians to return to the theology of the Fathers of the Church.  This is a key practical point of the Letter: "Therefore, what greater wish could I express to theologians than for their renewed commitment to recover the sapiential patrimony of the Holy Fathers? It cannot but produce a precious enrichment for their reflection, even on the problems of our times."  ("Sapiential" is from Latin "sapientia… wisdom".)

    There is a great deal going on in this Letter.

    I urge you to read it.

    • • • • • •

    19 Comments

    1. Thank you Father for highlighting this important Letter.

      Comment by Prof. Basto — 13 November 2007 @ 11:12 am
    2. “Benedict, as part of his larger ‘Marshall Plan’ for the Church is deeply concerned with reconciliation of the Churches, both within (think of Summorum Pontificum) and more proximately but without, with the separated Eastern Churches.”

      St. Malachi gave Benedict the title “Glory of the Olive.” I think he will indeed bring about this reconciliation.

      Comment by Augustine — 13 November 2007 @ 11:42 am
    3. God bless you Father for this Holy Letter from our Holy Father on one of the holiest saints residing in the Church Triumphant.
      St Chrysostom’s words must be an exhortation to the Church to end the blasphemous practice of recieving our Sacred Lord in the hand.
      As well as all other irreverant anomolies that distance us from the worthy reception of the Blessed Sacrament.
      God bless our Supreme Bridge Builder and God bless the Church.

      Comment by danphunter1 — 13 November 2007 @ 11:44 am
    4. Thank you Fr. for this post. The Holy Father is very enlightening (in the proper sense of the word). I particularly like the phrase “awe at transcendence”. Is this “awe” the true mark of “actuosa participatio”?

      Pope exorts theologians to return to the theology of the Fathers of the Church

      The theology of the Fathers was what was missing in the “reforms” of the 60’s and 70’s. It seems that forms and prayers were brought back (of course with major redactions as well as many new compositions), but the lex credendi was left in the theological amber.

      Comment by fxavier — 13 November 2007 @ 11:46 am
    5. “For when you see the Lord sacrificed, and laid upon the altar, and the priest standing and praying over the victim, ... can you then think that you are still among men, standing upon the earth? Are you not, on the contrary, straightway transported to heaven …?”

      Wow; beautiful; when is the last time you’ve seen such emphasis on the Holy Sacrifice at a Novus Ordo mass?

      Comment by Malta — 13 November 2007 @ 11:58 am
    6. fxavier: “I particularly like the phrase “awe at transcendence”. Is this “awe” the true mark of “actuosa participatio”?”

      A very good contribution to this entry. Thanks for that. Yes, I think this is a key. I believe that the Holy Father’s provision in Summorum Pontificum will result in celebrations of Mass in a manner that exerts a “gravitational pull” on the way all Masses are celebrated.  The central concept is mystery and our encounter with mystery.

      I spoke of this contact in my 14 September sermon at the great Fr. Finigan’s parish in the UK.  Here is an excerpt, but you can listen to it here:

      Holy Mass necessitates our own sacrifice, deprivation, self-emptying, even unto death.  One way this is made clear in truly sacramental liturgy is through the denial of sensory perception.  For example, in the Divine Liturgy of the Eastern Churches people can hear every text being sung but are denied visual participation because of the wall-like iconostasis with its closed doors.  Here in the Western, Latin Church, at least in the extraordinary use of the Roman Rite, we are denied at times not only to see various gestures but also to hear the mystery-laden central prayers. 

      The extraordinary form of Mass wants a deeper participation because it wants a greater deprivation and dying to self.  It asks for a deeper active participation, an active receptivity to what Christ is doing.  In a way, our participation at the older form of Mass reflects clearly our human condition, how in this earthly life we are waiting for the Lord, watching for Him to come to fulfill His promises in us.  We are waiting for Him to save us from our incessant fear of death, which St. Augustine called “our daily winter” (ep. 38). 

      Only by detachment from the merely worldly and through an interior movement of the soul upward, can the seeker come to “awe at transcendence” (William James), the experience of mystery.  Awe at transcendence, which is the very object of religion, cannot induced by empty spectacle or too much manipulation of those very elements which draw us to mystery, or, above all, the removal of those elements.  It must instead be promoted by a purification from distractions, from a measure of deprivation, of hunger, of longing for that which we glimpse only through the cleft in the rock, through the dark glass, through the mystery of the Cross.

      Comment by Fr. John Zuhlsdorf — 13 November 2007 @ 12:17 pm
    7. Malta: when is the last time you’ve seen such emphasis on the Holy Sacrifice at a Novus Ordo mass?

      Your question is probably intended as a polemic, but it is a legitimate question. It could be a good point for discussion: What about the older form of Mass helps us to encounter mystery

      It would be good to leave aside polemics, and I will help to keep this discussion tidy by deleting overly tendentious comments with bog this down.

      Comment by Fr. John Zuhlsdorf — 13 November 2007 @ 12:20 pm
    8. Dear Father Z: Many thanks for translating and making the Holy Father’s important letter available to us. In addition to the substantive content of the letter one other sentence jumped out at me which gives me a great deal of insight into the Holy Father’s approach to the exercise of his Petrine ministry:

      He also reached out to dissenters, favouring patience over aggressiveness in their regard, because he believed that in overcoming theological error, “nothing is more effective than moderation and gentleness.”

      Patience over aggressiveness! Difficult, yet necessary words to live by.

      Oremus pro invicem.

      Bailey Walker
      Falls Church, Virginia

      Comment by Bailey Walker — 13 November 2007 @ 1:04 pm
    9. Dar Fr. Z.: for reasons I cannot fathom, the Vatican website does not list it in Latest Updates.

      Perhaps that is because the Italian version was actually posted on the Vatican’s Web site back in August? If one goes to the index page for Benedict XVI’s Letters written in 2007, and scrolls down a bit, one can see the posting date of August 10, 2007 for the Italian version.

      Comment by techno_aesthete — 13 November 2007 @ 1:08 pm
    10. Fr. Z: “What about the older form of Mass helps us to encounter mystery.”

      I read Maria Montessori’s book, The Mass Explained to Children to my kids. It’s sort of like, “The Latin Mass for Dummies” for people like me. Let’s see, let’s start this discussion with the Altar itself. Altars in the catacombs were actually, usually, against the wall. Altars have steps leading up to them (or should); we are entering the “Holy of Holies,” much as the Jews did in the temple. That is the tip of the iceberg, but I’ll let others respond…

      Comment by Malta — 13 November 2007 @ 1:26 pm
    11. techno: No, it wasn’t released in August. It was just released last week. That isn’t the reason.

      Comment by Fr. John Zuhlsdorf — 13 November 2007 @ 2:08 pm
    12. Hmmm, well you can see that I didn’t use the word “release” or any form of it in my reply. It may have been released in November, but it was posted to the site in August (also look closely at the URL for the Italian version – you will see “20070810” which is part of their classification method for documents). I will grant you that usually documents seem to be posted on the date they are released, at least as far as I know. I cannot explain the difference between the apparent posting date and the release date.

      I just took a look at the Latest Updates page. I noticed there are entries from the beginning of Benedict XVI’s pontificate on that page. They aren’t exactly recent, let alone, latest updates. Unless some items are removed from that page, it is clea