20 July: St. Elijah, prophet

Did you know that today is the feast of St. Elijah, the Old Testament prophet?  Many Old Testament figures are considered saints by Holy Church.

You can read about Elijah in the Books of Kings.  God worked many wonders through Elijah as he warred against the impious worship of Baal.  Elijah eventually ascended into heaven on a whirlwind with a fiery chariot.  His return before the end times is prophesied in the Book of Malachi.

Remember: Reading the stories of these great figures in the Bible is like reading your own family history.  All these people and the events they were bound up in, all of salvation history, is your history.

Here is the entry for St. Elijah, prophet, in the Roman Martyrology:

2. Commemoratio sancti Eliae Thesbitae, qui propheta Domini in diebus Achab, regis Israel, Dei unici iura vinidicavit adversus infidelem populum tali animi robore, ut non modo Ioannem Baptistam, sed etiam Christum ipsum praefiguret; oracula scripta non reliquit, sed eius memoria fideliter servatur, praesertim in monte Carmelo.

Anyone?

And since St. Elijah is a central figure of veneration for Carmelites everywhere, including Carmelites in Wyoming who sell coffee in order to build their monastery, I will offer that today is a particularly good day to stock up on your coffee supply!

Mystic Monk Coffee!  It’s swell, especially when it is iced coffee – or iced tea – on a sweltering day!

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged
9 Comments

Bp. Finn (D. KC-St.J): Will China Buy Our Silence About Persecution of Catholics?

From the most excellent Bishop of Kansas City-St. Joseph, Most Rev. Robert Finn, appearing on the blog of the Catholic Key. My emphases and comments.

Will China Buy Our Silence About Persecution of Catholics? – Bishop Finn

From the upcoming edition of The Catholic Key:
By Most Rev. Robert W. Finn

In May of 2007, Pope Benedict XVI issued a Pastoral Letter to Clergy, Religious, and Lay Faithful of the Catholic Church in the People’s Republic of China. There the Holy Father expressed his affection for the people and his solidarity with them. He explained the proper relationships within the diocese, between the dioceses and the State, and the indispensable link between the local Churches and the Church Universal. The Pope offered encouragement for unity and a guide for evangelization.

The challenging circumstances for the work of the Church in China have been intensified because of a separation that has existed between a state-supervised Patriotic Catholic Association, China’s only legal public form of Catholicism, said to have about 5 Million members, and an “illegal,” “underground church,” believed to be the home for perhaps 10 million clergy, Religious and laity, who have sought to maintain a more unfettered communion with the Vatican. It is acknowledged that many members of the Patriotic Association, bishops included, have attempted to keep ties with Rome. [This depends in part on the region.  But, as I understand it, the fact that many of the PCA are trying to be close to Rome makes the situation a little fluid.]

In his letter of four years ago, the Holy Father seemed to succeed in establishing a conciliatory note, while clearly outlining vital principles of religious freedom, and the Church’s requisite foundation for governance and pastoral action. The Vatican was able to build some level of communications with the Peoples’ Republic, giving rise to what has been, for the last few years, a more active and helpful collaboration in the selection of bishops – within the Patriotic Association – on the Mainland.

As 2010 was drawing to a close, the mood of cooperation collapsed as the Patriotic Catholic Association began forcibly gathering bishops in order to bring them to Beijing for an assembly, the intended purpose of which was to elect a new national president of the Patriotic Association and president of the council of Chinese bishops. A number of bishops resisted and fled; others refused to participate in Masses that were to be part of the assembly.

An illicit ordination of a bishop – one in which there was no mandate from the Holy See or permission from the Holy Father – took place in November of 2010; another a few weeks ago on June 29, 2011, and another last week. In the Vatican’s daily Press Release of July 15, Vatican Press Office Director, Fr. Federico Lombardi S.J. spoke of the Pope’s “sadness and concern at the latest illegitimate episcopal ordination in China” which, he said, damages “the unity of the universal Church.”

July 14, 2011, “at Shantou in the region of Guandong Fr. Joseph Huang Bingzhang was ordained a bishop without pontifical mandate. … A number of bishops who are in communion with the Pope were obliged to attend yesterday’s ceremony.” Shantou already had a bishop, and the “new bishop” had been cautioned several times by the Holy See not to accept Episcopal ordination.  [In the ancient Church a man could be held down and validly ordained against his will.  That is not the case today.  I wonder what the role of free will plays in these consecrations.  BTW… I prefer “consecration” to “ordination”.]

Following the June 29 ordination, the Holy See released a declaration highlighting how a bishop ordained “without the papal mandate, and hence illegitimately, has no authority to govern the diocesan Catholic community, and the Holy See does not recognize him as the bishop of that diocese.” In a release of July 18, the Vatican formally confirmed the sanctions against the illegitimate bishops, expressed support for the conscientious resistance of those who remain faithful to the Holy See, and asked for a cessation of the hurtful actions, “The Holy Father, having learned of these events, once again deplores the manner in which the Church in China is being treated and hopes that the present difficulties can be overcome as soon as possible”.

Some news sites suggest that, after the forced elections of the Patriotic Associations, in which ballots were reported to have only one name, as many as ten ordinations of new bishops are expected.

Aside from the concern over the kidnapping and arrest of bishops compelling them to participate in fraudulent elections, there are grave implications for all Catholics in China who, whether within the Patriotic Association or in the so-called ‘illegal’ or underground church fear more interference in Church life, and a renewal of reprisals from years past.

According to a July 17 CNN story, leaders in China have, in turn, accused the Vatican of interfering in its religious affairs. Last November the U.S. State Department listed China as one of eight countries of “particular concern” on religious freedom. [Perhaps another State Dinner is in order before talking more about that.] Specifically the U.S. accused China of persecuting followers of the Dalai Lama in Tibet and Uyghur Muslims in western China. [NB:] While President Barak Obama met last week with the Dalai Lama, apparently no public mention has yet been made by the administration about actions against Catholics.

In his July 17 blog post, Deacon Keith Fournier of Catholic Online (www.catholic.org) lamented the silence of the U.S. and other western governments about these abuses against human rights and religious freedom in China. “We should ask ourselves the following question; with our growing economic reliance and dependence upon the Regime in China: Are we sacrificing our fundamental obligation to defend human freedom and human rights because we depend on the economic assistance of a repressive regime?

At one time we might have insisted that China’s desires to be accepted and welcomed as a partner with the West must be met by an insistence that it respects this fundamental human right of religious expression and organization. Now we must be careful that our need to come, hat in hand, to China in the economic sphere doesn’t require us to be silent about such significant restraints on human dignity.

For our Catholic brothers and sisters on the Mainland who have endured so much to hold on to an authentic Catholic faith, this is hardly an intellectual exercise. They need our support in prayer and political clout. Mary, Mother of the Church, intercede for your children. St. Joseph, defender of justice, pray for us.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , , , , ,
8 Comments

Congratulations to Philadelphia

WDTPRS extends congratulations to the people of Philadelphia for the appointment of His Excellency Most Rev. Charles Chaput as their new Archbishop!  Condolences to the people of Denver, who must now begin a process of prayer in expectation of the appointment of a new archbishop.

For those of you who are waiting for the appointment of a bishop, here are two proposals I made elsewhere:

PROPOSAL 1: Stop, now, and say a prayer to the guardian angels of those who must make this decision.

PROPOSAL 2: If your diocese is presently “sede vacante“, for each minute of gossip and even of speculation – which will go on anyway – spend 10 in prayer.

These are difficult times.  The devil is abroad and has great wrath.  The appointment of bishops is always important and difficult.

The bigger the see, the more important the choice, as we have seen to our great consternation.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
60 Comments

New Mars Rover News

We haven’t forgotten poor Spirit, but…

NASA to Announce Landing Site for New Mars Rover

July 18, 2011

WASHINGTON — NASA and the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum will host a news conference at 10 a.m. EDT, Friday, July 22 to announce the selected landing site for the agency’s latest Mars rover. NASA Television and the agency’s website will provide live coverage of the event that will be held at the museum’s Moving Beyond Earth Gallery. In addition, the event will be carried live on Ustream, with a live chat available, here.

Mars Rover

Posted in Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged , , ,
Comments Off on New Mars Rover News

Ireland: priests will refuse to break seal of confession if proposal becomes law

In Ireland

From CNA comes:

Irish priests will refuse to break seal of confession if proposal becomes law  [Really?]
By Katherine Veik

Dublin, Ireland, Jul 18, 2011 / 08:03 pm (CNA).- Catholic priests in Ireland are prepared to “strongly” resist a proposed law that would require them to disclose information learned in confession. [Strongly to resist = refuse to obey an unjust law.]

More than any other issue, it is probably the one that will unite both the liberal and conservative wings of the Church,” said Father Tony Flannery, a priest with the Association of Catholic Priests, in a July 18 e-mail to CNA.  [If only that were true, then the persecution would be worth it.  It has been in the past.  Or am I wrong?]

If even one exception was made to the seal of Confession, then the whole Sacrament would collapse,” he stated. “The truth of faith that this Sacrament is meant to convey is central to Christian teaching.”

The legislation, proposed by Irish Prime Minister Enda Kenny, [I wonder if Enda is pro-abortion.] would put priests in jail for up to five years if they failed to tell authorities about sexual abuse crimes disclosed during confession.  [I am exercising heroic self-editing.]

Fr. Flannery said that the Association of Catholic Priests has not taken the proposed law very seriously, because it is simply not “workable.” [I hope his analysis is better than that which they have given to the new translation.]

“When a person confesses in the confessional box, the priest would not normally know who they are, or indeed be able to see them,” he explained. “So how is he to report them?”  [Two words: FIXED GRATE.]

It is also “unlikely” that a person involved in abuse would go to confession, Fr. Flannery pointed out. [I wonder….  but that is not the point.]

“In my forty years of priesthood, I don’t ever remember someone confessing that they were currently abusing someone,” he said.  [So. What? ]

He noted that the prime minister’s bill also fails to address implications for other professions, and things that are said in other privileged situations of confidentiality.

It also opens the door for other crimes becoming exceptions, requiring further breaches of the confessional seal.

“Why make this one the only crime to be reported?” Fr. Flannery wondered.

The priest contends the proposed law is a “total over-reaction” to the recently released Cloyne Report, a study that found the Diocese of Cloyne failed to report nine cases of sexual abuse between the years 1996 and 2005.  [Nooo.. the Cloyne Report was just the occasion.  The true intention is to intimidate the Church into silence on moral issues, such as abortion.]

Fr. Flannery predicted lawmakers would be “more calm and reasoned about all this” after a few months have passed.

But he made clear that “if this does come to law – which I do not expect – priests will resist it strongly.”

Too much Flannery, not enough reporting.

How about more reporting on this.

In the meantime, remember that this is not at this moment about sexual abuse of children.  Sexual abuse of children is merely the excuse.  The real agenda is to silence the Church’s moral teaching.

Good luck Ireland.

Unless you do what the Holy Father proposed in his letter, you are done for.

Posted in Clerical Sexual Abuse, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , ,
22 Comments

Great animated movies

Tonight I caught a few minutes of The Incredibles.  This is a fun movie.  This movie has it all, for adults of a certain age.  I’m a sucker for super-hero movies anyway going way back.  I had my own Superman cape when I was five.  And I used it, when I wasn’t killing fish or riding a horse.

I suspect that parents of young children would find movies such as The Incredibles more amusing than their children.  Isn’t that often the case with animated movies today?  The combination of “supers” being sued for saving people and their middle-age spread and parenting problems was unbeatable.

Whenever I see anything of this movie, I always think of my friend, the great Roman Fabrizio and his wife and kids.

Moreover, The Incredibles has one of the funniest characters in all these digital animated features.

Almost as funny as Skrat.

If only I had cool music like The Incredibles for PODCAzTs… I might do them again.

On the other hand, I think Toy Story is the saddest movie ever made.  Wall-E might have been third… right after Toy Story II.

So… a question leading to an eventual poll.

What are your favorite animated movies (sad or not)?

Make some suggestions and maybe I can put a poll together.

Parents… you know far more of these movies than I do.

Just a bonus… here is Edna Mode from The Incredibles on super hero capes.

The campy voice is, I understand, from the male director of the film.  As a male it gives you the creeps, but as Edna Mode it’s just right.

[wp_youtube]M68ndaZSKa8[/wp_youtube]

And can we forget one the best scenes?

[wp_youtube]x2qRDMHbXaM[/wp_youtube]

Did you see the Hai Karate?  Only men… and alas women (s0rry) of a certain age…

And for the trads…

[wp_youtube]OuxCIaczUa0[/wp_youtube]

UPDATE:

I just realized how seriously out of my depth I am.

I think readers better help me organize this list.

UPDATE:

One of the readers was kind enough to send a possible list for a poll.  She wrote:

Here are the animation polling results from the comments as of 8pm EST.  I tried to accurately record the number of mentions for each film and then tallied the highest number of mentions in comments for the following categories.

Poll Categories:

Full Length Animated Film

The Incredibles
Finding Nemo
Kung Fu Panda
The Lion King
Pinocchio
Tangled
Toy Story
Up
WALL-E

* The above films had at least 6 mentions in the comments.  If we expand to at least 5 mentions we would then also include:

Bambi
Dumbo
My Neighbor Totoro
Ratatouille
Spirited Away
Toy Story 3

** Expanding to include those with 4 mentions:

Beauty and the Beast
Bolt
Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs
Despicable Me
Fantasia
Monsters, Inc.
Princess Mononoke
Shrek
Toy Story 2

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged
102 Comments

QUAERITUR: Deacons receiving Communion more than twice a day – Fr. Z rants

From a transitional deacon:

Is it lawful for a deacon to communicate more than twice on a Sunday, or any other day, for that matter?

I am currently a transitional deacon, and I am unsure if deacons can receive more than twice on a Sunday (given the canon that allows for a person to receive no more than twice per day). I know that a priest must receive the Eucharist at each Mass he celebrates or concelebrates, but I do not believe it is necessary for a deacon to do so, but I also wouldn’t want to cause scandal to the people if I do not receive when I am assisting at Mass. Any help that you can provide me would be greatly appreciated.

You identified the proper point after you asked your question.

The celebrating priest – no one else – is the only one who must consume the Eucharist during the Mass.  If he says Mass, for one reason or another, more than twice in a day, he still may receive Communion more then twice be he must receive more than twice.

A deacon is not a celebrating priest.  The CIC 1983 can. 917 applies to deacons as to every other member of the Latin Church.

Deacons are not obliged to receive Communion at any Mass, by the way, any more than any other member of the faithful is obliged to receive.  If the deacon is not in the state of grace then he had better not receive.  Consider: 1 Cor 11:29.  In the Extraordinary Form it is often assumed that the man who has the deacon and subdeacon role do not receive, or at least it is no surprise when they don’t.  Often the deacon or subdeacon is a priest who has already said Mass, or the deacon and subdeacon have already been to Mass and received earlier.  Under the 1983 Code they could receive again, iterum, of course, as its pleases them to receive.

The point is: if you are not the priest, don’t assume that you are obliged to receive just because you are at Mass. And that goes for everyone in the pews, too.

NB: If during the deacon’s third Mass on a Sunday he falls down in a heap from a severe case of the marthambles and is in danger of death, he may in that instance receive the Eucharist as Viaticum as part of Last Rites.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , , ,
14 Comments

QUAERITUR: Confirmed or ordained but not in the state of grace – Fr. Z rants

From a reader:

My question is regarding confirmation. Do those who receive the sacrament have to be in a state of grace in order for it to take? (the answer, I assume, is yes). I ask this because I am not sure I was when I was confirmed. I happen to have a terrible memory and can remember wanting to go to confession before the mass and not being able to do so. However, I have reason to doubt that said memory is accurate.

Should I be worried? Is there anyway to get a provisional confirmation like there are provisional baptisms for those who convert from other Christian denominations? Does one have to be confirmed in order to receive holy orders?

Should someone with these questions even consider holy orders?

Quickly, three sacraments confer on the recipient an “indelible mark” which they never lose forever and forever and forever, in hell or in heaven: baptism, confirmation, Holy Orders.   Baptism forgives all sins, Original and actual, so you obviously are not in the state of grace when you receive it.

If you are confirmed or ordained and you are not in the state of grace, you are nevertheless confirmed or ordained.  The sacrament has really been conferred.  You are thereafter a confirmed person or ordained man.  However, you may not have the advantages of the graces from that sacrament until you are in the state of grace.  The same goes for marriage.  Two people can be married validly even if they are aware of un-confessed mortal sins.  If they are baptized members of the Church who are free to marry, they have the right understanding and intentions, and the proper form is used before a duly appointed minister of the Church, etc. etc., they are truly marriage even though they may be wicked she might be a wicked ne’er-do-well and he a blaggarding rapscallion.

It is as if the sacrament is dormant in a person until she returns to the state of grace, when it wakes up and starts to function again.

In the meantime, if a priest says Mass, the Mass is valid.  If he forgives sins, the absolution would be valid if he has faculties, etc.

To be ordained the ordinand must be male and baptized.  If the man is baptized but not confirmed the ordination would be valid but, according to the way things are done now, illicit.

And, yes, a man who has these questions can still consider seminary.  If you hadn’t been taught these things before, you are inquiring now.  You may have a lot to learn or relearn through no fault of your own.  Get a copy of the Catechism of the Catholic Church for a start and begin reading.  That is a first good resource.  Man thinking about priesthood have to start somewhere and we all have different paths.

But I promised a rant, and here it is.

When an engine has a bad spark plug, it doesn’t work as well as it should.  If you are not in the state of grace, you are not operating as well as you should.

When you are not in the state of grace you are, to one degree or another, a drag on the whole Church.

We need you to clean up and fulfill your vocation because we are all in this together.

Mortal sin – bad spark plug.

If a ship at sea in a storm has crewmen who won’t report or can’t do their jobs properly because of scurvy, when a mast goes by the board, that ship is in peril.

Mortal sin – spiritual mutiny and scurvy.

So… you confirmed people out there.  Examine your consciences carefully and, for the love of God GO TO CONFESSION and confess EVERYTHING in both kind and number.

You married people out there.  Examine your consciences carefully and, for the love of God GO TO CONFESSION and confess EVERYTHING in both kind and number.

You priests and deacons out there.  Examine your consciences carefully and, for the love of God GO TO CONFESSION and confess EVERYTHING in both kind and number.

Simply baptized? …. need I repeat myself?

It’s all hands on deck these days, friends.

Thus endeth the rant.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , ,
9 Comments

QUAERITUR: Can I make the Act of Contrition in Latin?

From a reader, edited:

Would it be acceptable, when in the confessional, to recite the Act of Contrition in Latin?

Over the past several years I have become proficient in a fair number of Latin prayers, including those of the Rosary, simply because I feel more reverent using that language for praying. However, those are personal prayers used in private with no one else hearing them. The Act of Contrition, in contrast, would of course be heard by the priest. So my concern is that it could be perceived as (or perhaps actually would be a sinful act of vanity and pride although that would certainly not be my intention.

I’m sure your first answer will be the obvious one: ask the priest before saying the prayer. I plan to do so but only if you think the question is even worth asking. If not, I will stick to the common English version….

My first response has nothing to do with the sensibilities of the priest.  In my opinion, the confessor – the priest – can just sit there and listen to which ever act of contrition you desire to say, so long as you make it clear to him that you

a) are sorry for your sins
b) you intend not to sin again
c) will amend your life.

Ask yourself: Is that more easily communicated to the priest in Latin or in English?

Is is “acceptable” to say the act of contrition in Latin?  Of course it is.  Latin Church Catholics can use the language of the Church for the celebration of their sacraments.

But there are some considerations.

While the form spoken by the priest has a stronger impact on the validity of the absolution, your act of contrition also plays its role.

The confessional is like a tribunal,  a court room, in which you are simultaneously the accused and the prosecutor.  You present your case and then you beg for mercy from the just judge who also willingly and with love gives mercy and forgiveness and then heaps upon you additional graces besides.  There is a formal dimension to making a confession, and the sacrament as certain elements to be preserved.  Those elements include the penitent making it clear, one way or another mind you – there doesn’t have to be rigid uniformity in this – that there is sorrow for sin and firm purpose of amendment.  If the priest doesn’t have that sense from you, he must not give you absolution.

Since we are in an age in which many priests don’t have a clue what you would be saying were you to say the act of contrition in Latin, you might want to use English, just so that there is no doubt left as to what you are saying.

That said, I have absolved many a penitent who spoke the act of contrition in some African language or Asian language I cannot understand.  But I am used to dealing with all sorts of languages and tend not to freak out.  Also, I have found that Catholics from third world countries tend to make very sound and complete confessions according to the traditional style.  They do a far better job than many of Catholics from more privileged places, as a matter of fact.  Therefore, even when the act of contrition is, for example, spoken in Kinyambo, I have already arrived at the conclusion that the penitent is squared away.

But I digress.

Sure.. Go ahead and use Latin if you want, but check your motives and think about the confessor when you do.

Sure.  Go ahead and ask the priest if he minds.  I wouldn’t… but I deal with Latin all the time.

FWIW… I use English when the confessor is an English speaker.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , , , , ,
13 Comments

QUAERITUR: Validity of baptism when water touches only the hair – Fr Z rants

From a deacon:

I was wondering how safe it is to assume that water flowing over the hair along with the correct words constitutes a valid baptism. I ask because there were just 12 babies baptized in my parish and some of them didn’t get it on the forehead (some kind of just on the crown of the head). I assume they are valid because babies don’t have that much hair anyway!

I wrote on this issue here.

To recap and address the immediate question, in baptism conferred in the rites of the Latin Church water must touch some part of the the head, even if it runs only on the hair.

If it runs on the hair of the head, the baptism is valid.

That said: Perhaps bishops would do well to quiz priests about how to baptize.  Some might find this insulting, but I have heard some pretty crazy things.  It may be that men trained – this includes permanent deacons, by the way – in certain places in certain years cannot be assumed to know how to baptize properly.

I mean … how hard is it, guys, to do it right?  To do it in such a way that there can be no doubt in the minds of those watching that it was valid?  How hard is it?

For all love, if priests and deacons can’t do these basic things right, say the black and do the red, they should be sent to some… I dunno… remedial summer camp.

No air-conditioning or screens on the windows until they can demonstrate that they know the words and actions.

Puir Slow-Witted Gowks!

Slubberdegullions!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Puir Slow-Witted Gowk, Slubberdegullions, Wherein Fr. Z Rants | Tagged , , , ,
20 Comments