Daily Rome Shot 633 & adversarial developments

Welcome new registrants:
nopremx
Urszula
MSCatholic

Use FATHERZ10 at checkout for 10% off

Meanwhile,…

Black’s King is exposed.

White to move and force mate.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Priestly chess players, drop me a line. HERE

Interested in learning?  Try THIS.

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE  These links take you to a generic “catholic” search in Amazon, but, once in and browsing or searching, Amazon remembers that you used my link and I get the credit.

The traditional Benedictine monks of Le Barroux are making wine at the ancient papal vineyards near Avignon. You can order it! In doing you help them.

The code “FATHER10” get’s you 10% off.

At chess.com the narrative grows.   There’s a kind of chess Hunger Games going on between the bots.

There are now only two bots left.  Mittens, the soul crushing kitten, whose ELO is listed as 1, but it really playing at about 3500 (at least), and M3GAN whose ELO was 1250.

Her avatar now has become rather more sinister, replete with tell-tale flames licking up in the black background.  I played again M3GAN several times yesterday with time control and won earlier in the day.  Then something happened.  Her ELO went from 1250 to 3000, where it is as I write.  It looks like Mittens is in the cross-hairs.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
8 Comments

The Demos Memo… written by the late Card. Pell

In Lent of 2022, at the time of the rare consistory of Cardinals in Rome, a “memo” emerged penned by the pseudonymous “Demos” in the style of yesteryear.  The Memo was about the state of the present pontificate.  It offered also points for future corrections.  The overall assessment of major aspects of the pontificate and the state of the Vatican City State and Roman Curia were decisively negative.  It wasn’t just a list of assertions.  It was backed up with reasons and numbers.  The Demos Memo was circulated among the Cardinals and others.

The Demos Memo, post at the website of longt-time vaticanista Sandro Magister makes for engaging reading and pondering.  HERE

It is strongly assert now that Card. Pell was Demos.  This was his assessment and these were his suggestions about the future.

The revelation of Card. Pell as Demos has provoked hysterical reactions from the usual suspects, probably because it is clear, convincing and spotlights heterodoxy, suppression of traditional worship and, above all, the problem of homosexuality.

It doesn’t take long to read and it bring to the fore quite a few points for consideration at both the larger Catholic level as well as the local.

Posted in The Drill | Tagged
18 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 632 and a new adversary

Photo by The Great Roman™  (He has a great eye.)

Use FATHERZ10 at checkout

Meanwhile,… get chess stuff.  Do you have a good set?

White to move.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

3:16 isn’t just in John.

I’ve also added a new B16 mug to the store with a magnificent quote about the purpose of creation.

Meanwhile, in the saga of chess.com’s evil feline, the soul annihilating Mittens has a new colleague who has replaced “Scaredy Cat”, “Angry Cat” and “Grumpy Cat”.

I’m not quite sure what this is about.  Perhaps a shot at a thoroughly unlikeable “royal”?  The scarf suggests the Union Jack.

UPDATE: I had a bit of a rag chew on ZedNet today.   One in PA one in GA.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
6 Comments

A new decree in a US Archdiocese seeks to limit “ad orientem” worship, but it is based on a FALSE translation. Here we go again.

Yesterday I received a PDF of a new “Decree” from the Archbishop of Cincinnati, Dennis Schnurr.

HERE

The Archbishop has introduced a new “policy” on ad orientem worship.

There must be in every parish or “cluster” (they say “family”) of parishes at least one public versus populum Mass.

Also,

1. When a freestanding altar is present the celebration of Mass – whether versus populum or ad orientem – may take place ONLY on said altar, NOT on the older “high” altar.
2. If the freestanding altar is dedicated, but not fixed (and thus “moveable”), it may NOT be moved from the sanctuary for the purpose of using the older altar.

Here’s the kicker.

The “decree” is based on GIRM 299 and the Responsum of 25 Sept 2000 of the Congregation for Divine Worship about GIRM 299.

I have written often and extensively about GIRM 299, which deals with posture or position of the celebrant and the construction of the altar.  GIRM 299, which is authoritatively IN LATIN, was MISTRANSLATED in the USCCB’s documents about liturgy.  The MISTRANSLATION gave the impression that versus populum celebration was the most desirable posture for Mass.  That is NOT what the Latin says.  And if there were any doubt about that a dubium was submitted to the CDW, which in a Responsum debunked that falsehood and went on to explain the Latin to those who were incapable of dealing with the Church’s official language (99% percent of bishops).

The “Decree” of Cincinnati quotes GIRM 299 as being (and this is a FALSE translation):

In regard to the arrangement of the sanctuary, the General Instruction of the Roman Missal states: ‘The altar should be built separate from the wall, in such a way that it is possible to walk around it easily and that Mass can be celebrated at it facing the people, which is desirable wherever possible.” (GIRM 299)

Since the celebration of Mass versus populum (facing the people) is “desirable wherever possible”, this should be the regular practice in churches, oratories, and chapels of the Archdiocese of Cincinnati, nearly all of which have a freestanding dedicated altar.’

Again, this is a FALSE translation of GIRM 299.

The writer of this decree, who put it in front of the Archbishop to sign, must have known that this is a FALSE TRANSLATION because he also cited the Responsum that explains the Latin.

So, what is the accurate translation?

I cannot believe that after all these year I have to deal with this incompetence again. For example HERE

GIRM 299 actually says that what is desirable, when possible, is that the altar be separated from the wall, not that Mass be versus populum.

299. Altare maius exstruatur a pariete seiunctum, ut facile circumiri et in eo celebratio versus populum peragi possit, quod expedit ubicumque possibile sit.

The main altar should be built separated from the wall, which is useful wherever it is possible, so that it can be easily walked around and a celebration toward the people can be carried out. (Emphases added)

THAT’s what the Latin really says.

On 25 September 2000 the Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments issued a clarification (Prot. No. 2036/00/L) regarding 299 in the Latin GIRM. That clarification, Responsum, says:

The Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments has been asked whether the expression in n. 299 of the Institutio Generalis Missalis Romani constitutes a norm according to which the position of the priest versus absidem [facing the apse] is to be excluded. The Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, after mature reflection and in light of liturgical precedents, responds:

Negatively, and in accordance with the following explanation.

The explanation includes different elements which must be taken into account. First, the word expedit does not constitute a strict obligation but a suggestion that refers to the construction of the altar a pariete sejunctum(detached from the wall).  It does not require, for example, that existing altars be pulled away from the wall. The phrase ubi possibile sit (where it is possible) refers to, for example, the topography of the place, the availability of space, the artistic value of the existing altar, the sensibility of the people participating in the celebrations in a particular church, etc.

Expedit refers to a suggestion about the construction of the altar.  It is suggested that, where possible (depending on the topography of the sanctuary, etc.) there he an altar that can be used from either side, that can be used for versus populum Masses.  It does NOT day that versus populum is preferable.  PERIOD.

So, this “Decree” from Cincinnati is based on a FALSE translation.  GIRM 299 is forced to say something it does not say.  Moreover, whereas the Responsum is cited… giving the writer the benefit of the doubt let’s assume he read it… and whereas the Responsum explains the Latin…. therefore the “Decree” is based on a lie.

It is sad that draconian ideological micromanagement is taking over the Church, a positivism which is, ironically, simultaneously antinomian.

The “Decree” does not place an outright ban on ad orientem worship.  However, it does impose, on priests who have more than one Mass – and many priests are alone in parishes – one versus populum Mass.  That means that someone has to rearrange everything.

Furthermore, it means that what a pastor has done to move worship ad orientem has been undermined.

The question is raised.  QUAERITUR: What there an outbreak of ad orientem worship that provoked complaints?  And instead of the Archbishop supporting his priests, he dumped them in favor of the complainers?  (That’s usually how things go, which is borne out by studies and interviews which reveal that priests have less and less confidence in their bishops and worse and worse rapport.)  Or else… one priest started saying Mass ad orientem and that prompted diocesan-wide decree?

Either way, all the canonists I have consulted with over the years agree that bishops cannot forbid or restrict ad orientem worship, which is assumed to be the case in the rubrics of the LATIN edition of the Missale Romanum.

But bishops do what they want.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Latin, Liberals, Linking Back, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Pò sì jiù, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, Turn Towards The Lord | Tagged ,
26 Comments

ATTENTION – New Site! “Reverent Catholic Mass Let Us Help You Find a Reverent Catholic Church Near You!”

I bring to the attention of the readership and interesting site called

Reverent Catholic Mass

Let Us Help You Find a Reverent Catholic Church Near You!

The site reads:

Trying to find a reverent Catholic Mass or acquire resources to grow personally and encourage your church to worship with reverence?

Reverent Catholic Mass will help you:

        • Locate Catholic churches near you that offer Mass with reverence.
        • Get inspired to work on your own spiritual life. Because you can’t give what you don’t have.
        • Discover ways to encourage more reverent church worship and pious devotions at your parish.
        • Tactfully motivate others to join the effort to reinvigorate your parish.We believe that with the right resources, every Catholic can join a supportive, reverent Mass community.

There is an interactive map available and a PREMIUM map (to which I do not have access)

POINT OF INTEREST:

 

This is important, especially now that we see a large slice of the hierarchy AT WAR upon the faithful who have traditional inclinations.

We are our rites.  Liturgy is doctrine.   Reverence in worship is key.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Our Catholic Identity, The Campus Telephone Pole, The future and our choices |
15 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 631

Welcome registrants:
Abp Laud and Tortoise
Gethsemanegirl
palestrinadei
StCatherineofSiena

Card. Pell consecrated my regilded chalice on 5 November 2022 in Rome.  I will remember him at Mass when I use it.  He was friendly and good to me over the years.  Requiescat in pace.

Use FATHERZ10 at checkout

Meanwhile,…

White, down a Rook, to move.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Your use of my Amazon affiliate link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.  US HERE – UK HERE

I just started new candles in the chapel. They are pure beeswax, unbleached though not dark. They smell wonderful and burn cleanly. Bees are amazing. So are the Summit Dominicans who made them.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
7 Comments

Cardinal Pell: R.I.P. With a VIDEO of his superb interview about the death of Benedict XVI

I am so sad to hear of the death of George Card. Pell at 81 years.

I got along quite well with him years ago, because he was involved in the Vox Clara committee working on the English translation of the Novus Ordo Missale Romanum. He and other members referred to my columns from The Wanderer.  We had some chances to meet and talk.

The latest chance was in Rome a couple months ago.  Card. Pell consecrated my chalice after it was regilded.  I told him then that it would always think of him and of Card. Mayer (who originally consecrated it) when I used it for Mass.

I was deeply moved by his “prison diaries”, which if you haven’t looked at, you should.

PRISON JOURNAL – Vol. 1 – Ignatius Press  US HERE – UK HERE

I had great hopes that he would be a main player in the lead up to the next conclave.

Please, in your goodness, stop and say a prayer for Card. Pell.

His appearance on EWTN after the death of Benedict XVI was terrific.. exactly one week ago as I write.   Card. Pell summarized something I saw Ratzinger/Benedict do many times in conferences or meetings. He would take all points or questions and summarize them and then start responding one by one to the people who raised them.  It was breathtaking to watch his mind work.  He would look down, at first, his hand making points in the air before him.  Then he would look up and engage the people with their answers.

Here is Card. Pell ONE WEEK AGO…

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

And… GO TO CONFESSION!

You do not know the day or the hour of your meeting with the Just Judge.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
9 Comments

Concerning decades of trench warfare: two recommended readings today. Don’t miss them.

I warmly recommend that you go to NLM where Peter K has posted about the minutes of Commission of Cardinals back in 1986 about the use of the 1962 Missale Romanum.

I read those minutes, and more, way back when I was a collaborator of the PCED.  The minutes have wound up on clerus.va.  Interesting.

What people don’t know is that there was a document essentially like Summorum ready for JP2’s approval.  Why that didn’t happen is one of the saddest tales there is.  Today, things would be far different.  Perhaps we wouldn’t be facing this…

Reading those minutes again after all these years gave me the shivers, frankly.

And now Benedict XVI is dead.  I used to talk with him in the hallways (and elsewhere) about these things.

Also, I direct your attention to a good piece about active participation at Crisis.  The writer’s points are what I have been saying for decades, but he says it well.  And repetita iuvant.

And today, I was asked a question about whether I had ever written about beauty and the “spirit of the liturgy”.

All of this is a reminder that I have been at this, fighting in these trenches, for decades.  Young whippersnappers are coming up to take over the task, but there is still a heck of a lot they don’t know and they are discovering.   Hopefully this path will be smoother for them because others have been there before, as they were for me and others.

Some time ago, before COVID intervened, I was talking with a priest friend of similar age about having a, intergenerational conference for younger priests to talk to them about what it was like in the 70’s, 80’s, 90’s, when permissions were being eeked, what is was like in seminary.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
17 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 630 and Mittens the Kitten, Destroyer of Worlds

Photo by The Great Roman™

Use FATHERZ10 at checkout

Meanwhile,…

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE

I look forward to the new Norcia beer Triple, but last night I had some Blonde from the wonderful Norcia monks. I invited Mom and we had a “Taco Salad” with the Birra Nursia and it was terrific!

In chess news… have any of you been following the evolving tale… or tail… of the evil genius whose chess skills are crushing the souls of mere mortals?

I am talking, of course, about the diabolical feline over-lord…

Mittens

Mittens the Kitten is one of the AI “bots” at chess.com right now, along with other cat bots, such as Mr. Grumpers, who bears a strong resemblance to a certain figure in the Church.

Mittens, who taunts you with ominous trash talk, has an ELO (rating) of 1… but is crushing Grand Masters right and left. Some videos have been made pitting Mittens against Stockfish (a chess AI engine of extreme strength) with mixed results. It seems, too, that Mittens’ play was a little erratic last week. She started losing games in odd ways. There were problems with the engine. I believe they have been corrected and Mittens is now back as the chess bot equivalent of the Destroyer of Worlds.

I’ve beaten the other cat bots, but not Mittens.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
9 Comments

ASK FATHER: Can we pray to the Poor Souls in Purgatory to intercede for us?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

On a recent podcast a priest said that asking a specific person in Purgatory to pray for you/us is necromancy. Thoughts?

My first reaction is that Father seems not to understand the difference between conjuring spirits and the unity of the Mystical Body of the Church.

“Necromancy” is from two Greek words: nekrós, dead and manteía, divination.   It is the attempt to communicate with the spirits of the dead by evocation, that is by summoning.  It is gravely sinful to do this.  Beyond superstition it opens one up to attacks by demons.   Invoking the intercession of a Poor Soul in Purgatory is nothing like summoning the spirits of the dead for reasons of communication.

In the Old Testament we read how abhorrent necromancy is to God (Deut 1:11-12) and that it is punishable by death (Lev 20:27 and cf. I Sam 28:9).  Saul found out the hard way with the witch of Endor.

There are the exceptional cases of “Purgatorians” who are enabled by God to appear to the living or to communicate things in some way. That is not necromancy, which involves the summoning of spirits which are certainly demons.

Let’s go deeper.

While it is clear that we can pray for the Poor Souls, the question is raised, “Can the poor souls pray for us?”  And, “Is asking a Poor Soul to intercede for us either harmful or, if not harmful, just a waste of time?”

I’m not trying to dodge this when I say “I don’t know for sure.”  But we can draw some conclusions.

This is a question on which great writers are divided and about which there is no official Church doctrine to which we must submit.

The Catholic Encyclopedia is helpful on this.  Always a good place to start.

The majority of writers – some great names among them – hold that the Poor Souls are not capable of praying for us because, as St. Robert Bellarmine in his De Purgatorio held, they lack any knowledge of our circumstances and of our possible requests.  They are not given the infused knowledge of the Blessed Souls in Heaven.  They are “poor” in that respect.

On the other hand, the great theologian Suarez in De Poenitentia thought that, though the Poor Souls don’t know specifically what we need or what we request, they know in general what people need and how much we depend on God’s grace.

St. Thomas Aquinas, whose teaching carries great weight (although we must remember that his teachings are not co-termimous with the teachings of the Church), says in STh II-II that the Poor Souls cannot pray actively because they are in a passive state.

On the other hand, St. Alphonsus Liguori in The Great Means of Salvation says that the Church does not invoke their intercession because they don’t know our prayers from us, but we can piously believe that God makes our prayers known to them.

St. Alphonsus cites the great mystic St. Catherine of Bologna who obtained favors from God through prayers to the Poor Souls.  Thus, St. Alphosus (HERE):

Again, it is disputed whether there is any use in recommending one’s self to the souls in purgatory. Some say that the souls in that state cannot pray for us; and these rely on the authority of St. Thomas, who says that those souls, while they are being purified by pain, are inferior to us, and therefore ‘are not in a state to pray for us, but rather require cur prayers.’ But many other Doctors, as Bellarmine, Sylvius, Cardinal Gotti, Lessius, Medina and others affirm with great probability, that we should piously believe that God manifests our prayer to those holy souls in order that they may pray for us; and that so the charitable interchange of mutual prayer may be kept up between them and us. Nor do St. Thomas’ words present much difficulty; for, as Sylvius and Gotti say, it is one thing not to be in a state to pray, another not to be able to pray. It is true that those souls are not in a state to pray, because, as St. Thomas says, while suffering they are inferior to us, and rather require our prayers; nevertheless, in this state they are well able to pray, as they are friends of God. If a father keeps a son whom he tenderly loves in confinement for some fault; if the son then is not in a state to pray for himself, is that any reason why he cannot pray for others? and may he not expect to obtain what he asks, knowing, as he does, his father’s affection for him? So the souls in purgatory, being beloved by God, and confirmed in grace, have absolutely no impediment to prevent them from praying for us. Still the Church does not invoke them, or implore their intercession, because ordinarily they have no cognizance of our prayers. But we may piously believe that God makes our prayers known to them; and then they, full of charity as they are, most assuredly do not omit to pray for us. St. Catharine of Bologna, whenever she desired any favor, had recourse to the souls in purgatory, and was immediately heard. She even testified that by the intercession of the souls in purgatory she had obtained many graces which she had not been able to obtain by the intercession of the saints.

The fact is, we are still in Communion with the Poor Souls as we are in Communion with the Saints in Heaven.  We all belong to the one Church, in unity of charity and, one might be allowed to think, prayer.

The fact is also that the Church doesn’t invoke intercession by the Poor Souls liturgically, though we constantly raise prayers to Heaven liturgically to intercede for the Poor Souls.

From that I conclude that we shouldn’t pray for the intercession by Poor Souls in a public or ritual way.  This seems to be part and parcel of why in the process for beatification there must not be public liturgical cult of the servant of God.

We are free to believe that the Poor Souls can intercede for us.  It doesn’t not harm us or them to ask the Poor Souls in a general way to pray for our needs on Earth.  It would not be wrong to ask for prayers and intercession provided the one we might have in mind is capable of doing so, as those in Heaven certainly are, and those in Purgatory perhaps could be.

We could make a reasonable assumption that someone has been admitted to the Beatific vision and pray to him for intercession, but in fact that soul is still in Purgatory.  Wasted prayer?  God knows what to do about it.  Sincere, devout prayer is not a waste of time.

Furthermore, the Poor Souls won’t be “Poor” forever.  We might say, “Please pray for me when you are in the Beatific Vision and you have infused knowledge of how and what to pray for.”

Drilling a little more, since we are Unreconstructed Ossified Manualists, we ask the manuals.

Ludwig Ott in Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma (p. 323) says that it is a sententia probabilis that the Poor Souls can intercede for us because of our unity in the Church.  Ott says that Pope Leo XIII in 1889 “ratified an indulgenced prayer in which the poor souls are appealed to in dangers of body and soul.”

Citing Thomas against invocation of Poor Souls, Ott also says,

“the Church has never frowned on the invocation of the Poor Souls –  a practice which is widespread among the Faithful and which has been advocated by many theologians”.

Tanquerey in his Manual of Dogmatic Theology says (1286):

b. the souls detained in purgatory can pray for us. This is the more common opinion.  On the one hand, out of charity they love us; on the other hand, because they are dear to God, nothing impedes their prayers from being heard.

Finally, I turn to the Catechism of the Catholic Church:

958 Communion with the dead. “In full consciousness of this communion of the whole Mystical Body of Jesus Christ, the Church in its pilgrim members, from the very earliest days of the Christian religion, has honored with great respect the memory of the dead; and ‘because it is a holy and a wholesome thought to pray for the dead that they may be loosed from their sins’ she offers her suffrages for them.” Our prayer for them is capable not only of helping them, but also of making their intercession for us effective.

And

962 “We believe in the communion of all the faithful of Christ, those who are pilgrims on earth, the dead who are being purified, and the blessed in heaven, all together forming one Church; and we believe that in this communion, the merciful love of God and his saints is always [attentive] to our prayers” (Paul VI, CPG § 30).

While the “dead who are being purified” are not yet in Heaven, they are nevertheless holy souls who are not quite ready for the bliss of Heaven due to the justice required in temporal punishment due to sin or some last attachments.

In my opinion, the Poor Souls do not have specific knowledge of our needs or prayers for intercession unless God gives it to them for some reason.  Again, there are also exceptional cases when “Purgatorians” are enabled by God to communicate things to us, primarily their need for prayers and warnings to shape up.  If that is the case, then God could also give them things to pray for.   Perhaps God might do this directly or perhaps through the agency of the Guardian Angels of the Poor Souls.  Their Angel Guardians do not abandon the Poor Souls, after all, and the angels would know what we need.

We can and should, by the way, invoke the help of our angels, not by names, which we cannot know, but in a general sense: “angel of my mother, who is sad”, “angel of Bill at work who seems to hate me, help us to work things out”.  We know only three names of angels from Scripture.  A document from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith instructs us not to invoke any angels by a name unless the three we know: Michael, Gabriel, and Raphael.

Evocation of spirits is superstitious and sinful.  Prayer to Poor Souls for intercession with God is not.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Four Last Things, Mail from priests | Tagged ,
10 Comments