Today, a heart-felt plea to God for the Church.

Today in the Vetus Ordo the prayer of Daniel rises from Holy Church’s lips, the Lord’s own voice in the sacred liturgical action, to God the Father … on behalf of the CHURCH today.

Context is key.  These Vetus Ordo Mass formularies are quite ancient, going back to and before Gregory the Great (+604).  It was a time of fear and famine.  The Lombards were ravaging and camped near Rome itself.  Masses of refugees fled into the City and people were starving, even the wealthy.  Government was zero.  Effectively, there was no one left but Gregory to organize and deal with the problems.

The reading from Daniel today describes Rome in the time of Gregory.  Daniel

Lesson from the Prophecy of Daniel (Dan 9:15-19)

In those days, Daniel prayed to the Lord, saying, “now, O Lord our God, who didst bring thy people out of the land of Egypt with a mighty hand, and hast made thee a name, as at this day, we have sinned, we have done wickedly. 16 O Lord, according to all thy righteous acts, let thy anger and thy wrath turn away from thy city Jerusalem, thy holy hill; because for our sins, and for the iniquities of our fathers, Jerusalem and thy people have become a byword among all who are round about us. 17 Now therefore, O our God, hearken to the prayer of thy servant and to his supplications, and for thy own sake, O Lord,[a] cause thy face to shine upon thy sanctuary, which is desolate. 18 O my God, incline thy ear and hear; open thy eyes and behold our desolations, and the city which is called by thy name; for we do not present our supplications before thee on the ground of our righteousness, but on the ground of thy great mercy. 19 O Lord, hear; O Lord, forgive; O Lord, give heed and act; delay not, for thy own sake, O my God, because thy city and thy people are called by thy name.”

Dear readers, take on penances in reparation for and the for the conversion of our leaders in the Church.

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, PRAYER REQUEST, Save The Liturgy - Save The World | Tagged ,
2 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 442, etc.

Daily Fervorino.

WORDLE

 

3:16 isn’t just in John.

Posted in Sermons | Tagged ,
1 Comment

Your Sunday Sermon Notes: 2nd Sunday of Lent

Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all. Share the good stuff.

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at the Masses for the 1st Sunday of Lent?

Tell about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass.  I hear that it is growing.  Of COURSE.

Any local changes or (hopefully good) news?

Those of you who regularly viewed my live-streamed daily Masses – with their fervorini – for over a year, you might drop me a line.

I have some written remarks about the TLM Mass for this Sunday – HERE

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
4 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 441, etc.

Photo by The Great Roman™

Daily Fervorino.

WORDLE

Use your phone’s camera!

Posted in Sermons | Tagged
3 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 440, etc.

Of interest concerning Gregorian Masses.

Photo by The Great Roman™

WORDLE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , ,
Comments Off on Daily Rome Shot 440, etc.

12 March 1622 Canonizations – 400 years ago today

On this day, 12 March, in 1622 Pope Gregory XV canonized Sts. Teresa of Avila, Ignatius of Loyola, Francis Xavier, Philip Neri and Isidore the Farmer.

“Four Spaniards and a saint!”

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged
4 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 439, etc.

Photo by Jacob Stein

Daily Mass Fervorino HERE

WORDLE

 

OPPORTUNITY
10% off with code:
FATHERZ10

 

 

 

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in Chess, Sermons | Tagged , ,
Comments Off on Daily Rome Shot 439, etc.

Francis sacks a bishop in Puerto Rico for …. why?

I read first at Rorate that a 57 year old bishop of the Diocese of Arecibo, Puerto Rico, was summarily removed from the diocese by Francis the Merciful, first of his name.

He was asked to resign. He refused. He was s-canned.

There was no reason given. He hasn’t been charged with anything. If he had been an abuser, like Francis’ friend Zanchetta, perhaps he would have been promoted… like Francis’ friend Zanchetta.

I did see this on Crux, which places two issues side by side and which I’m convinced are related.

Fernandez Torres was also accused of refusing to transfer seminarians from his diocese to the new Interdiocesan Seminary of Puerto Rico, and he was the only prelate not signing several statements made by the bishops’ conference, including a national ban on the Tridentine Mass following Pope Francis’ motu proprio Traditionis custodes, that limits the use of the traditional Latin liturgy. The bishop also voiced his opposition to a bill that would have banned “conversion therapy” for homosexuals.

So, he wasn’t cooperating with the other bishops, who are trying to crush people who want the Traditional Latin Mass and who are soft on sodomy.

Remember about the Bishop of Mayagüez, forbade Roman chasubles, linen tablecloths, chalice veils, maniples, birettas….  That’s what is going on in PR.

Again I had my thought of gathering the cancelled priests, bishops and even cardinals at some monastic complex of a now extinct lib order and starting a seminary.

Posted in Francis | Tagged
22 Comments

ASK FATHER: No snails this year? No leaping over fires or burning witches?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

For eight years (this will be the ninth) my family has hosted a party on Midsummer’s Eve, complete with sung Vespers (last four years with a priest), bonfire, homemade water slide, and much food. Once or twice the feast has rubbed elbows with the Sacred Heart, but this is the first year Sacred Heart has fallen on 6/24.

My Novus Ordo ordo says St. John has been transferred to the 23rd, with I Vespers on the 22nd. My FSSP ordo says it’s been transferred to the 25th, with no I Vespers on the 24th. My TAN wall calendar says “Trad: vigil of St. John” on the 23rd and “Trad: Nativity of St. John” on the 25th!

Question: Should we even have the party? And, if so, when? If, properly speaking, there is no vigil of St. John’s Day this year, perhaps we should just accept that, take a party sabbatical, and resume next year, rather than do some liturgical eating our cake and having it too. Or maybe we should just have a Sacred Heart party…

In a similar situation, what would, say, Bavarian peasants in the 12th century have done, blissfully underinformed and yet (or rather, therefore) full of culture. Would they have rolled their flaming wheels through the streets of the town and leapt over fires as usual, and perhaps not even known that the Masses their priest was saying that evening and the next day were actually those of the Sacred Heart? Ok, I know there was no feast of the Sacred Heart in the 12th century… Corpus Christi maybe, even a late Pentecost. Or we could say the late 19th century. In any case, would country peasants have pressed on with their feast, heedless of this collision of the movable and immovable, or would they have forbore in the years that called for it? And what is the new peasantry to do?

At last an important question!

This year, liturgically, John the Baptist (24 June) gives way to the Christological feast (Friday after the 2nd Sunday after Pentecost).  It’s only logical, for Christ to be greater on that day and John to be less.  No?

That’s sort of the whole point, also of the fact that it is the time of year when the days start to get shorter again.

So, have the party on this year’s liturgical date, which happily is a Saturday, 25 June.

On the other hand, what’s a day here or there?  Since we are not Bavarian peasants without calendars, blissfully unaware even of the name of the present Pope and getting along without him just fine, have the St. John/Midsummer party when it pleases you to have it.

And thanks for the chance to remind people to plan for their snails in honor of St. John.


Reminder… when shopping online with Amazon, please use my affiliate links.  You get the same prices and I get a small percent of the sale. It adds up and it really helps.

US HERE – UK HERE

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Lighter fare, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , ,
2 Comments

ASK FATHER: Pre-owned engagement or wedding ring. Exorcism?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Thanks for everything you do, your blog has been tremendously helpful over the years. My girlfriend and I are getting engaged soon and when we went ring shopping, our favorite one was previously owned. I want to make sure this kind of ring is safe to buy if I don’t know its history… is it likely that there are any harmful spiritual/demonic attachments, and if so, are there blessings and/or exorcisms that a parish priest could say in order to get rid of any harmful spiritual baggage? Or would it be better to choose a different ring? (This ring was far and away the most beautiful one we found, so we really don’t want to choose a different one). Thanks so much, God bless!

I am glad that you are aware of the possibility of bad influences from objects whose provenance is uncertain.

It seems to me that, once purchased, all you have to do is take the ring to a priest and ask him to bless it, preferably with the older, traditional Rituale Romanum and with Holy Water blessed with the traditional rite.

As a matter of fact… now that my memory storage disc is finally spinning up… there are both a traditional blessing for a wedding ring and a traditional Rite of Betrothal.  It should be in the Rituale Romanum. I know it is in “Weller”.   Also, Angelus Press has an handy printing/booklet for the betrothal rite.

In any event, get the ring blessed.  No problem.

However, if it starts to spin around and you hear howling, drop your Harry Potter book and send me another email.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, One Man & One Woman | Tagged
5 Comments