ASK FATHER: Can we eat meat today, Friday, Feast of the Sacred Heart or must we abstain?

A couple people have asked today about Friday abstinence from meat.

Canon 1251 of the Code of Canon Law for the Latin Church says:

Can. 1251 Abstinence from meat, or from some other food as determined by the Episcopal Conference, is to be observed on all Fridays, unless a solemnity should fall on a Friday. Abstinence and fasting are to be observed on Ash Wednesday and Good Friday.

Today, 11 June 2021 is…

a) a Friday,
b) the Feast of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, and as such
c) a Solemnity (N.O. calendar – 1st Class TLM), and therefore
d) NOT a day for obligatory abstinence from meat, etc.

Some printed trad calendars not withstanding, we go by the Code of Canon Law.  And that’s the Code as it is now, not as it was or as we think it ought to be.

Hence,…

If you want to eat meat today, you can do so with a light heart, even if it goes straight to your left anterior descending.

If you don’t want to eat meat today, you can abstain with a light heart, even if it is vegan.

Obligatory abstinence on such a joyful feast as today is seems contrary to our Catholic identity.

I think I’ll be a “glad trad” today and have a cheeseburger for lunch.  Perhaps Culver’s.

 

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, ASK FATHER Question Box, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
12 Comments

Intense image of the Sacred Heart and YOU – ACTION ITEM!

This striking detail from a print by the Catholic artist Daniel Mitsui.

It is inspired in part by the visions of Gertrude and the 1467 Sanctus Salvator.

Even the small details, the little animals that are scattered through the background, have symbolic meanings…. even the platypus!

Intense.

Now…

ACTION ITEM!

I ask you all earnestly to pray the classic Act of Reparation that the great Pius XI released in 1928 in Miserentissimus Redemptor.

Prayer of Reparation

O sweetest Jesus, whose overflowing charity towards men is most ungratefully repaid by such great forgetfulness, neglect and contempt, see, prostrate before Thy altars, we strive by special honor to make amends for the wicked coldness of men and the contumely with which Thy most loving Heart is everywhere treated.

At the same time, mindful of the fact that we too have sometimes not been free from unworthiness, and moved therefore with most vehement sorrow, in the first place we implore Thy mercy on us, being prepared by voluntary expiation to make amends for the sins we have ourselves committed, and also for the sins of those who wander far from the way of salvation, whether because, being obstinate in their unbelief, they refuse to follow Thee as their shepherd and leader, or because, spurning the promises of their Baptism, they have cast off the most sweet yoke of Thy law. We now endeavor to expiate all these lamentable crimes together, and it is also our purpose to make amends for each one of them severally: for the want of modesty in life and dress, for impurities, for so many snares set for the minds of the innocent, for the violation of feast days, for the horrid blasphemies against Thee and Thy saints, for the insults offered to Thy Vicar and to the priestly order, for the neglect of the Sacrament of Divine love or its profanation by horrible sacrileges, and lastly for the public sins of nations which resist the rights and the teaching authority of the Church which Thou hast instituted. Would that we could wash away these crimes with our own blood! And now, to make amends for the outrage offered to the Divine honor, we offer to Thee the same satisfaction which Thou didst once offer to Thy Father on the Cross and which Thou dost continually renew on our altars, we offer this conjoined with the expiations of the Virgin Mother and of all the Saints, and of all pious Christians, promising from our heart that so far as in us lies, with the help of Thy grace, we will make amends for our own past sins, and for the sins of others, and for the neglect of Thy boundless love, by firm faith, by a pure way of life, and by a perfect observance of the Gospel law, especially that of charity; we will also strive with all our strength to prevent injuries being offered to Thee, and gather as many as we can to become Thy followers. Receive, we beseech Thee, O most benign Jesus, by the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Reparatress, the voluntary homage of this expiation, and vouchsafe, by that great gift of final perseverance, to keep us most faithful until death in our duty and in Thy service, so that at length we may all come to that fatherland, where Thou with the Father and the Holy Ghost livest and reignest God for ever and ever. Amen.

The Devil is active and we must fight him, firstly, on our knees in prayer before we rise to fulfill our state in life with fidelity and perseverance.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ACTION ITEM!, Hard-Identity Catholicism | Tagged
Comments Off on Intense image of the Sacred Heart and YOU – ACTION ITEM!

Parents who turn their daughters into quasi-prostitutes

This morning I had a debate with myself. Ought I or not to cancel my subscription to Claremont Review of Books?

This same morning I serendipitously solved the debate through a fortunate click over to Ann Barhardt’s page.

Ann posted a link to an IMPORTANT piece from 2020 at The American Mind which is from the Claremont Institute.

Big Pimping

This piece is about how parents, especially AWFLs (affluent white female liberals) are in effect turning their daughters into quasi-prostitutes by putting them early on contraceptives and allowing them to be exposed to every sort of perversion in sex-ed classes.   The long term results, lots of really screwed up girls and a really screwed up society.

The writer, Peachy Keenan, is blunt.  A few samples…

[…]

[F]or the last twenty years or so, American girls have been raised from birth to be premium dating fodder, primed from the first whiff of puberty to be Available for Sex on Saturday Night. So why are they being ghosted in droves? Abandoned and left to die alone, clutching their pets and Warren for President signs?

[…]

When it comes to sex ed, I believe in the screenwriting theory known as Chekhov’s gun: if you show a gun in the first act, it must be fired by the third. If you show kids the sex toys (and worse) in the first grade, the sex toys will be used by high school.

[…]

At an institutional level, we are creating a cursed generation of females expert at every imaginable permutation of sex with an infinite number of partners, while largely shunning the other thing, the main thing, the only thing still emitting any heat in the cold, merciless hearth of contemporary life: the dream of forming a family.

Because the shocking truth is: No one wants to wife a sex expert. 

[…]

Why do AWFLS want their daughters to start dating so early? As anyone who has been involuntarily single can confirm, dating almost always totally sucks. Why do PARENTS (!) want to extend their child’s miserable dating window longer and longer, younger and younger? How many years of soul-destroying “dating” are they willing to subject their kid to? Ten years? Twenty? A lifetime of unfulfilled longing?

Shouldn’t parents be guiding children to make their dating windows as short as possible? Imagine if your entire dating history consisted of one date! It would be like pitching the perfect game in baseball. We met, went on one date, and that was it.

[…]

What happens when the 12-year-olds know more about sex than the most syphilitic Parisian madames of the 18th century? Does this ensure they will marry young and well, and be good and loving parents?

Or is it more likely that this blasted knowledge guarantees a tedious multi-decade Bataan death march through dating apps, therapists, anti-depressants, polyamorous cul-de-sacs, and (eventually) to a spiritual and biological dead end?

[…]

This is a must read, I’m afraid.   It isn’t pretty but it is needed.

And I’ll save you a little time: have another window open so you can look up some of the things she mentions, cultural references, etc.  I had no idea, for example, about DryBar (a hair styling place) ghosting (getting dumped after a brief time) and pleasers (high platform shoes used mainly by hookers and, I believe, certain Jesuits).

Young parents, read this.  Grandparents, watching your children raise children, read this.  Young people contemplating starting a family….

Claremont did us a favor by publishing it, so I think I’ll keep my subscription to their review.
 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, One Man & One Woman, Pò sì jiù, Sin That Cries To Heaven, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged
14 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 185

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
1 Comment

PARODY SONG ALERT: Synodal Rock!

From the blog’s Official Parodohymnodist…

To the tune of Jingle Bell Rock!

Bishops meet, some are sweet, synods are held,
Some are included, some are repelled,
Synodal synods, how synods are run,
Now the synodal way’s begun.

Synods on synods and synods for fun,
Synods for clergy, synods for nuns,
Synodal synods, we’re open! We care!
In St. Peter’s Square!

What a bright time, its the right time
To cast the truth aside,
Synodal time is a full time,
To say we’re humble while we bask in pride!

Giddy-up lazybones, get back to work,
Synods are here to stay,
Marx and Lou Tagle, and Mario Grech,
That’s the synodal way!

Papal calls, synod halls, synodal path,
Synods as deadly as Sylvia Plath,
Dancing and prancing round dogmatic fare
In St. Peter’s Square

Not a fine show, it’s a mime show,
But we can’t look away
Synod yentas, lineamentas
Appear and vanish each and ev’ry day

Giddy-up, rigid ones, get back in place,
All you can do is pray,
Marx and Lou Tagle and Mario Grech,
Run the synodal
Rule the synodal
Own the synodal way…..

Posted in Lighter fare, Parody Songs, You must be joking! | Tagged , ,
3 Comments

Just to review…

Just to review…

Benedict XVI’s 2007 Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum says:

Art. 5, § 1. In paroeciis, ubi coetus fidelium traditioni liturgicae antecedenti adhaerentium stabiliter [previously continenter] exsistit, parochus eorum petitiones ad celebrandam sanctam Missam iuxta ritum Missalis Romani anno 1962 editi, libenter suscipiat. Ipse videat ut harmonice concordetur bonum horum fidelium cum ordinaria paroeciae pastorali cura, sub Episcopi regimine ad normam canonis 392, discordiam vitando et totius Ecclesiae unitatem fovendo.

Art. 5, § 1. In parishes, where there is stably present a group of the faithful attached to the previous liturgical tradition, let the pastor willingly receive their petitions that Mass be celebrated according to the Rite of the Missale Romanum issued in 1962. Let him see to it that the good of these faithful be brought harmoniously into accord with the ordinary pastoral care of the parish, under the governance of the Bishop according to canon 392, by avoiding discord and by fostering the unity of the whole Church.

Pastors of parishes can implement the Traditional Latin Mass without the permission of the local bishop.

The canon mentioned says:

Can. 392 §1 Since the Bishop must defend the unity of the universal Church, he is bound to foster the discipline which is common to the whole Church, and so press for the observance of all ecclesiastical laws.

§2 He is to ensure that abuses do not creep into ecclesiastical discipline, especially concerning the ministry of the word, the celebration of the sacraments and sacramentals, the worship of God and the cult of the saints, and the administration of goods.

That “all ecclesiastical laws” §1 includes respecting Art. 5, § 1. of Summorum Pontificum.  That  “He is to ensure that abuses do not creep into ecclesiastical discipline” in §2 includes includes respecting Art. 5, § 1. of Summorum Pontificum.  Prohibiting pastors from implementing Summorum would be a abuse of ecclesiastical discipline.

In Universae Ecclesiae the 2011 Instruction about the application of Summorum Pontificum

14. It is the task of the Diocesan Bishop to undertake all necessary measures to ensure respect for the forma extraordinaria of the Roman Rite, according to the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum.

That “insure respect” sounds like what Pope St. John Paul II wrote in 1988 in Ecclesia Dei adflicta.  After talking about the “rightful aspirations” of the faithful the saint wrote:

6. Taking account of the importance and complexity of the problems referred to in this document, by virtue of my Apostolic Authority I decree the following:

c) … respect must everywhere be shown for the feelings of all those who are attached to the Latin liturgical tradition, by a wide and generous application of the directives already issued some time ago by the Apostolic See for the use of the Roman Missal according to the typical edition of 1962.

That “respect” and that “wide and generous application” were required by the Pope in the name of his “Apostolic Authority”.  That’s not a phrase that pops up all the time.

That said, we might be hard pressed to find something laid down in law that has been so violated as 6 c) of Ecclesia Dei adflicta.  Perhaps, Veterum sapientia.  Perhaps,  Ex corde Ecclesiae.

Perhaps it is time to implement Summorum Pontificum and its attendant foundational and explicative documents and then see what happens.

Fathers.  Get to work.  Start working on that Latin.  Start working on those prayers.   One technique to help learning and memorizing is to recite them aloud 5 times, 5 times a day.  Repetita iuvant.

Lay people.  Get organized.  Start building a stable group.  Start thinking about learning the prayers for Mass as well and training servers in view of future need.  Start learning to sing Gregorian chant: there are online resources such as HERE.  Get yourselves up to speed.

We are our rites.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, Universae Ecclesiae |
Comments Off on Just to review…

Daily Rome Shot 184

UPDATE your BOOKMARK!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
1 Comment

REVISITED: Moral Injury, traditional Catholics and burnt out priests

Sometimes I go back to look at what I posted on this day of the year in the past.

This is from last year, 2020.  It was an interesting question at the time because COVID 1984 Theater was ramping up.   It is still going on in many ways.

A follow up is due.

Two cents: I think quite a fewer priests found, during COVID THEATER, an uplift through learning how to celebrate the Traditional Latin Mass.  That, however, also has its downside: one begins to realize how much one’s been cheated out of one’s patrimony.

___

Originally Published on: Jun 9, 2020 

From a reader…

I am a physician and have had the opportunity to work with several burnt out priests over the years. I am concerned about the emotional well being of priests during the current situation because of a stressor being called moral injury.

This injury comes from a situation when a person can not take an action that he feels to be morally right, or is forced to do something morally wrong, by the order of a superior. I am concerned that priests are experiencing this as there bishops have prohibited the sacraments.

I am keeping this in prayer but I am hoping by alerting you to this condition it might be get into some hands who are in a position to work with priests with moral injury to at least recognize this reality.

This is very interesting.  I am grateful for the information and tip about “moral injury”. Since I received this, I’ve done some reading and thinking about moral injury.  For example, good starting point summary of main points HERE

Consider this:

WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES OF MORAL INJURY?
Moral injury can lead to serious distress, depression, and suicidality. Moral injury can take the life of those suffering from it, both metaphorically and literally. Moral injury debilitates people, preventing them from living full and healthy lives.

The effects of moral injury go beyond the individual and can destroy one’s capacity to trust others, impinging on the family system and the larger community. Moral injury must be brought forward into the community for a shared process of healing.

In the context of a soul, with respect to the diversity of beliefs and religious perspectives held by those involved with moral injury, consider this:

Moral injury is damage done to the soul of the individual. War is one (but not the only) thing that can cause this damage. Abuse, rape, and violence may cause similar types of damage. “Soul repair” and “soul wound” are terms already in use by researchers and institutions in the United States who are exploring moral injury and pathways to recovery.

One writer defines moral injury as resulting from a betrayal of what is morally right by someone who holds legitimate authority and in a high stakes situation.

For example, priests who really believe in the cura animarum, and who are ordered, bullied, threatened by authority above them to go against what they believe is right and good for themselves and their people.   Application: being virtually forbidden to provide the sacraments to the faithful during the COVID-1984 lockdown.

I am no psychologist.  On the other hand, I didn’t fall off the turnip cart yesterday, either.

While moral injury is usually a phenomenon among warfighters in military service or veterans, it is not exclusive to them, either.  The Mayo Clinic has tracked this among physicians and found that one-third suffer from moral injury, which is sometimes taken for being burned out.

While it is highly tricky to apply a “diagnosis” to a group, much less, an individual, doesn’t think explain, in part, some aspects of more traditional Catholics?

In many cases tradition-inclined priests have been treated savagely by their bishops and other priests.  Traditional Catholic have been too.  They have been for years, even for decades, prevented by authority (usually through bullying) from doing what their consciences tell them is the right thing to do.  They are forced, year in and year out, to do what they think is, if not outright wrong, at least inferior to what could be done with a little leeway and compassion.   They are in a perpetual bind, caught between the desire to be a good member of the presbyterate and one with the bishop, while knowing that they can’t stand your “rightful aspirations”, as John Paul II called them.

Then there is the case of the priest who spends a lot of time and effort to build up something in his parish, only to be moved and see everything he built wrecked in a fortnight by some lib who succeeds him.   The lay faithful bear the brunt of the abuse and the priest who got moved is forced to watch, helplessly, from afar.

Take the example of a young priest who is, legitimately, desirous of having his whole patrimony as a Catholic priest, including tradition.   The ultra-lib pastor to whom he is assigned as an assistant will have none of it and ridicules, threatens and abuses his assistant as a result.  So the younger priest is daily forced to shove down his better instincts.

Take the example of the lay faithful who, if they want to receive Communion, have for decades been forced to receive on the hand rather than on the tongue, listen to truly horrid music, endure tragically bad homilies and all manner of liturgical abuse.  They know they are bound to go to Mass to fulfill their obligations, they truly want to worship God well, and they dread getting up every Sunday.   Otherwise, they feel guilt for going over to the SSPX “St. Joseph Terror of Demons” Chapel rather than their territorial “Sing A New Faith Community Into Being Faith Community” where Fr. “Just call me Bruce!” Hugalot perpetrates a regular catastrophe.

It takes a toll.    Warfighters sometimes will manifest moral injury after being in combat situations for only a short time.   A lot of traditional Catholics have been enduring the injury resulting from moral conflict – being forced to betray what you know is right – for unrelenting decades without an end in sight.

I don’t want to press this point beyond proposing that there could be an element of moral injury among those who have held “legitimate” aspirations regarding Tradition.  I want to avoid generalization as well.

It’s food for thought.

It seems to me that “moral injury” can, in fact, describe the plight of some priests who are thought of or think of themselves as “burnt out”.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Linking Back, Priests and Priesthood, The Coming Storm, The Drill | Tagged
20 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 183

Photo by The Great Roman™

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
8 Comments

Another voice in defense of Summorum Pontificum. And some calming words.

While not a seismic surprise, I didn’t expect a strong defense of Summorum Pontificum (aka the “emancipation proclamation) from Joan Lewis, the cordial veteran Vatican correspondent who has since 1990 worked for VIS and EWTN.

Joan, after some introductory point, goes on to cite Phil Lawler’s piece (which I wrote about HERE).  But she adds two points that are so obvious, so common-sensical, so concise that they bear sharing.

First…

As I have been reading about the possible changes the Pope will make to Summorum Pontificum, I have been wondering about the number of vocations born within a TLM setting. Has anyone researched this?

Yes, in France there has been.  Including the numbers of men entering traditional groups, the percentage of TLM oriented priests in France being ordained each year is significant and growing.

Also, since the plural of anecdote is data, I get reports of ordination classes here in these USA.  For example, the other day a friend who watches these things and who is an insider wrote that a major archdiocese ordained half a dozen men and, of them, three are known as “trad”.

This is what I keep hearing.   Many men want to say their 1st Mass in the Traditional Form, although sometimes their bishops bully them into something else.

Second… quoting Eric Sammons:

Among other things, he asks the question on most lips: “No matter what we guess the impact might be, the question remains: Why would Pope Francis do this? If a CEO decided to shut down the fastest-growing division in his company, it would be a head-scratcher for sure. So why would Pope Francis look to limit the reach of what is, in terms of growth, the most successful movement in the Church today?”

Vocations and pews filling with families with young children.  And the TLM participants in general give more in the collection than the Novus Ordo participant.

None of it makes sense.  So, non-sense makes sense.

It’s ideological to the point of irrational.  Or rather it follows a rationale that is so foreign to anything … Catholic that it is hard to fathom.

Friends… I keep saying that these rumors are rumors.  They are to be considered unsubstantiated because the are substantially unsourced.   Someone says something happened or said something isn’t quite enough.  And we are talking about Italy, here.

Click

There is always the possibility that there is, at least partially, a campaign of disinformation, even a “false flag” operation.   It probably didn’t start that way, but once the situation was created, some people on both sides took advantage.  Think about a virus getting out of a Chinese lab.  It probably wasn’t intentional, but once it was out, the CCP took advantage of the situation, as the the Dems, everyone knowing that, during the US summer, some flash-point event would take place to exacerbate the situation (i.e., Minneapolis).

Let everyone keep calm.  Let’s get more and more birettas for seminarians (the nightmare of the libs = today’s seminarians).

Meanwhile, FATHERS, get to work.

Let not your hearts be overly troubled. A little anxiety, by the way, can produce clear thought and hard work. Too much can produce paralysis.

Get your Masses established NOW.

NOW.

 

Posted in Si vis pacem para bellum!, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Drill | Tagged ,
36 Comments