I am getting notices that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has accepted His Excellency Archbp. Niederauer’s invitation to "converse" about a few things.
I solidarity with other blogs, I note that American Papist wrote about this too.
Here is the situation.
SAN FRANCISCO – House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, under fire from U.S. bishops [not just bishops - let us not forget that House Republicans wrote to her... and the blogosphere!] for comments she made about abortion, accepted on Friday an invitation from the Roman Catholic archbishop of San Francisco for a private talk.
Pelosi said in a letter to Archbishop George Niederauer that she’d "welcome the opportunity for our personal conversation and to go beyond our earlier most cordial exchange about immigration and needs of the poor to Church teaching on other significant matters." [Blah blah... she is trying to couch this in other issues which are of interest to the Church. Keep in mind that there is no moral equivalents in this matter.]
The proposed meeting stems from comments Pelosi made Aug. 24 on NBC’s "Meet the Press." The Democratic congresswoman defended her support for abortion by saying "doctors of the church" have not been able to define when life begins.
She also cited the role of individual conscience. "God has given us, each of us, a free will and a responsibility to answer for our actions," she said. [She also said that it doesn't make a difference when human life begins, abortion should still be an option.]
Niederauer, who extended the invitation in the Friday column of the archdiocesan newspaper, and other bishops say that the church from its earliest days has considered abortion evil.
Niederauer said Pelosi’s remarks were in "serious conflict" with church teaching and it was his duty to explain clearly church teachings about faith and morals.
Several U.S. bishops have condemned the remarks made by Pelosi, a Catholic school graduate who repeatedly has expressed pride in and love for her religious heritage.
While Pelosi’s letter said she was interested in speaking about "church teaching on other significant matters," it did not mention abortion specifically. Her spokesman has defended her comments, saying in a previous statement that the congresswoman "fully appreciates the sanctity of family."
I am very pleased with this. Archbishop Niederauer’s letter brought her in.
It is necessary now that their conversation actually take place and take place soon.
I suspect that the conversation, which will be private, won’t be transcribed for the public. But surely there will be reports on both sides.
Our friend Diogenes made these observations. First, it took Speak Pelosi less than 24 hours to respond, but nearly two week for the Archbishop to issue a statement. Also…
how many other American Catholic politicians are still waiting for their bishops to summon their courage, clear their throats, and raise the issue for the first time[?]
What must come to the fore is that the issue of human life and abotion had to have been discussed and that Speaker Pelosi acknowledges what the Church teaches. If she then will not embrace that teaching is a different matter. Pro-abortion Catholic Senator and candidate Joe Biden (D-DE) accepts what the Church teaches without waffling too much about it, but then he acts against that teaching.
What we at least need from Speaker Pelosi is that she, as a Catholic, acknowledges what the Church truly teaches.