
I have a comparatively short trip to Rome coming up. First, a couple days with a priest friend in Brooklyn, which breaks up the journey and puts a buffer into the flights. A couple weeks in Rome. The same coming home. To this purpose, I asked for some donations for my expenses and some of you jumped right in. NB: I will have to do another fund drive later for April and May (Holy Week, etc.) in case some of you might want to wait. That will be a heavier load to lift, due to high season, etc.
So far my airfare is covered. I could use a bit more for per diem and my rent (which I pay in 3 month blocks).
Thanks, so far this time, to:
JL, SAS, JL, JK, MH, GF, KM, VD, DLS, HL, TB, DvdH, LD, KK, AC, GW, DM, T&MLG.
Today:
DH (designated for flowers for the apartment!)
Meanwhile,
Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links. US HERE – UK HERE WHY? This helps to pay for health insurance (massively hiked for this new year of surprises), utilities, groceries, etc.. At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.
In churchy news….
This is ironic. Bishops in these USA seem to have genuinely desired to promote greater faith in and reverence for the Eucharist. However, when people want to show greater faith in and reverence for the Eucharist – by kneeling – some bishops (or their controlling apparatchiks) rush to stifle the groundswell of devotion.
For example, we all saw the scrambled message of the prelate of the Windy City, who argued – I am not making this up: Kneeling in a procession interferes with the procession (never mind that processions can stop at stations for prayer, etc.). The movement at Mass of the congregation to receive Communion is a procession. Thus, kneeling to receive Communion is contrary to the Communion procession. BUT… there’s more… since processions are a tradition, and because kneeling is against processions, therefore kneeling to receive Communion is against tradition.
In normal circumstances, most people would not even imagine trying to concoct this.
QUAERITUR: Could this be a liturgical application of “walking together”?
Now we read that the Archdiocese of the Five Boroughs, sent out a note that pastors should not be putting altar rails into their churches because “there is no need” for them.
According to the memo, more and more people want communion rails. The writer doesn’t know why… or said… she? doesn’t know why, which is more likely. I’m going with “she” for the pronoun. It works either way.
Priests would not be trying to put in rails this unless, a) they saw the need and b) people wanted them enough to pay for them. But, no, ignore story after story, articles and videos one after another, about young people who want a more traditional and muscular expression of their Faith, about converts multiplying where Tradition is offered. Really! You are obliged by their will to accept this claim on the authority of the memo-writers: “there is no need”.
WHY is there “no need”, you ask?
Because the rules says so, you ignorant backwardist!
This from those who ignore the rules (canon law, procedure) when it suits their ends.
(Were altar girls against the rules? Just asking.)
There is no need for Communion rails because the RULES says so!
What are those rules? The General Instruction of the Roman Missal (Novus Ordo) says that the reception posture is standing. Therefore, no kneeling. Therefore, no rails are needed. See? SEE?!?
Never mind that Redemptionis Sacramentum specifically guarantees that people may kneel and receive upon the tongue. Also, never mind that, as their memo states, this is “picking up steam”. But NO! People mustn’t have what they desire if it is against the RULES (that is, the rules we controlling libs like). After all, there has been an effort over the last year or so to promote Eucharist devotion and there is nothing that undermines devotion for the Eucharist like – QUOD DEUS AVERTAT! – kneeling to receive Communion!
My red.

In chessy news… HERE
Black to move and gain material for a win. This is nuts. You’ll be tempted at the obvious, but follow the forcing moves for a hilarious conclusion six moves later.

Uncontrolled fire is terrifying.
At churches near fires, ring real bells if you have them. Bells are sacramentals. They are “baptized” and given names. They speak. In valleys of mountainous countries, as storms approached, people would ring the bells and pray the Litany. That’s one of the reasons why we have consecrated bells!












In chessy news… HERE

In chessy news… not much. 
























