“resurrection glasses”

Sometimes I have written here about trying to see annoying or challenging people through what I have called “resurrection glasses”, that is, the inner lens a Christian ought to have well-polished which helps us to see how people may be after the resurrection.

If we can learn to imagine how God may intend that person to be in heaven, after the resurrection, we may be able to avoid some of the sins we can commit through lack of charity.

It is not very often that I find something of value on the site of the National Catholic Reporter, but there is a good article right now by Michael Leach, publisher emeritus and editor at large of Orbis Books, and author.

I am not quite sure about his discussion of “metapsychiatry”, which I don’t understand very well, and frankly don’t care to read about much more.  It sounds rather new-agey and synchretistic to me, with its Jung and Zen and references I found upon a quick web check.

But that’s not the point.

The writer is advancing something which we ought to be able to agree on: people who are afflicted with physical and mental challenges are made in God’s image and likeness, God loves them and wants them to be happy with Him in heaven, and if they come to that glorious state through their infirmities their beauty just may – in my opinion – by far surpass what “normal” people enjoyed in this vale of tears and may hope ever to attain in the life to come.

We don’t need “metapsychiatry” to teach us about our Faith and about charity.

Nevertheless, the article was a reminder that we all have to examine our consciences and keep our “resurrection glasses” clean.

Here is the first part…


Christ and cerebral palsy

By Michael Leach
Created Nov 08, 2011
by Michael Leach [1] on Nov. 08, 2011

“Christ plays in ten thousand places, lovely in limbs, and lovely in eyes not his to the Father through the features of men’s faces.” — Gerard Manley Hopkins [From “As Kingfishers Catch Fire”]

How easy it is to see the face of Christ in the eyes of a baby or the limbs of a child racing a kite or the features of a movie star. The key to eternal life is to behold the loveliness of Christ in the eyes of a child born blind, the limbs of a teenager with cerebral palsy, the features of a woman scarred with burns. The truth is — the beauty is — each wears the face of Christ and they all play as one.

How many times have I averted my eyes from a picture in TIME of a starving baby with flies on her face or didn’t pay attention to the fellow slumped over in a wheelchair at a wedding or found an excuse not to visit a friend wasting away with cancer or pretended the family at the diner who had a noisy child with Down syndrome didn’t exist? And what a blessing it becomes to begin to see with spiritual eyes and behold the image of the emaciated baby as she really is, whole, to touch the cripple in the wheelchair and say hello, to visit a friend or acquaintance in the hospital or nursing home with a great big smile, and to stop by the table with the Down child and touch his shoulder and tell him and his parents what a wonderful family they are. The truth is — the wonder is — that the words of Christ are literally true: “Whatever you do unto these, you do for me.” And what we do for Christ we do for them and for ourselves and for the whole human race. For all of us, each of us, are one.

[…]

Read the rest there, if you wish.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
20 Comments

QUAERITUR: Loss of papal honors for priests who are “removed from the active ministry”

20111110-140501.jpgFrom a reader:

Since you have worked within the hallowed halls of the Vatican, would you comment on the revocation of papal honors (e.g. Chaplain of His Holiness, Honorary, P.A.) of priest who have been “removed from the active ministry” for “impropriety”. Are papal honors ever revoked once they have been bestowed? It seems scandalous that a priest who has been suspended should retain the title of “Monsignor“.

In my opinion, these honors should, without question or hesitation, be removed, if necessary by a formal act.  However, in the press or in common parlance it might be useful to speak of “Msgr. A” who did B and is now removed permanently from active ministry, dismissed from the clerical state, etc.

It would be interesting to search through a new copy of the 2012 Annuario Pontificio when it comes out to see what some instances may have produced.  Every Monsignor in the world, who really is a Monsignor, is listed in this book.

I hesitate, however, to say that any man who is “suspended” should be stripped of papal honors.  Being suspended isn’t the same as being dismissed from the clerical state.  Unlike dismissal from the clerical state, suspension is often a temporary matter, sometimes resulting from misunderstandings, etc.  I have heard of bishops who have launched suspensions like Jovian thunderbolts during arguments, only to rescind them soon after.

That said, I suppose there would have to be something formally published in the official publication of a diocese, such as the regular “Ad clerum” letter or diocesan newspaper.

Perhaps there could be photos of the purple or red buttons being snipped from the man’s cassock.  I am reminded of an old rite, way way back in the day, for the dismissal of a priest which involved scraping the man’s palms with a piece of broken glass.

Fitting, if you ask me… and you did.

Posted in ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , ,
15 Comments

Why we need more “ad orientem” worship: “we cannot serve this world with a kind of banal officiousness”

Perpend:

“Go therefore and make disciples of all nations …” (Mt. 28:19). But the dynamism of this mission, this openness and breadth of the Gospel, cannot be revised to read: “Go into the world and become the world yourselves!” Go into the world and confirm it in its secularity!” The opposite is true. The holy mystery of God, the mustard seed of the Gospel, cannot be identified with the world but is rather destined to permeate the whole world. That is why we must find again the courage to embrace what is sacred, the courage to distinguish what is Christian – not in order to segregate it, but in order to transform it – the courage to be truly dynamic.”In an interview in 1975, Eugene Ionesco, one of the founders of the theater of the absurd, expressed this with all the passion of seeking and searching that characterizes the person of our age. I quote here a few sentences from that interview:

“The Church does not want to lose her clients, so wants to acquire new members. This produces a kind of secularization which is truly deplorable. … The world is going astray, the church is going astray in the world, priests are stupid and mediocre, happy to be only mediocre people like the rest, to be little proletarians of the left. I heard a parish priest in one church saying: ‘Let’s all be happy together, let’s shake hands all round … Jesus jovially wishes you a lovely day, have a good day!’ Before long there will be a bar with bread and wine for Communion; and sandwiches and Beaujolais will be handed round. It seems to me incredible stupidity, a total absence of spirit. Fraternity is neither mediocrity nor fraternization. We need the eternal; because … what is religion? what is the Holy? We are left with nothing; with no stability everything is fluid. And yet what we need is a rock.”

It seems to me that if we listen to the voices of our age, of people who are consciously living, suffering, and loving in the world today, we will realize that we cannot serve this world with a kind of banal officiousness. It has no need of confirmation but rather of transformation, of the radicalism of the Gospel.

Joseph Ratzinger in Co-workers of the truth: meditations for every day of the year (Ignatius Press, p. 303 – originally from Diener eurer Freude).

Buy the book.

USA: Book and Kindle version.
UK: Book and Kindle version.

Posted in Brick by Brick, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, New Evangelization, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
14 Comments

Gallup Poll: Fewer Dems in Church, Majority ‘Seldom or Never’ Attend

Interesting from The Christian Post:

Fewer Democrats in Church? Majority ‘Seldom or Never’ Attend
By Paul Stanley | Christian Post Reporter

A Gallup poll released Monday highlights the religious spilt between Democrats and Republicans, showing that 52 percent of Democrats seldom or never attend church. And the percentage of Democrats who attend church weekly has dropped two percentage points – down from 29 to 27 percent – since the first quarter of 2008.

[…]

Read the rest there.

Posted in Dogs and Fleas, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
29 Comments

UK’s grocery chaim Tesco is backing a homosexual event in London. Why?

When I was in England last month, and since I did some cooking for friends, I did some grocery shopping at Tesco stores.

I am now irritated at Tesco, based on what I read in the UK’s best Catholic weekly, The Catholic Herald, by Francis Phillips.  An excerpt:

[…]

Why on earth is Tesco promoting [London Pride, the UK’s largest gay festival]? Tesco is a supermarket; its remit has been to sell good-quality food and other items at very reasonable prices, and in this it has been hugely successful. Why has it now aligned itself with an aggressive political organisation such as Pride London? Why has it given up its sponsorship of Cancer Research? Or at least, if it has given up this sponsorship, why hasn’t it taken up with another mainstream charity such as the British Legion or Age UK? There are thousands of ex-servicemen and wounded soldiers needing help in this country, and millions of elderly people in danger of neglect. They are a fundamental part of the fabric of our society – the kind of fabric that Tesco should be reflecting. Why, why, why?

I understand that one in four of the British public shops at Tesco. It is certainly “diverse and international” and a place where “everyone is welcome” – whatever their orientation. Who cares about other people’s orientation when they are shopping? It’s about making ends meet, balancing the family’s food budget, getting value for money and picking up bargains (including Bogofs). I shop there and have done so for years. At its doors there are often charity workers asking for money – notably Children in Need and other worthwhile causes.

Inside the store you can see why it is so successful: organic food, Fairtrade, low-fat, corn-fed chickens, free-range eggs, a range of healthy options, vegetarian foods – any possible new demand has Tesco instantly on its heels with a shelf load of new items. For my taste there is too much Halloween junk, too much piped muzak, too much “Christmas cheer” too soon and too many Easter eggs on display by New Year’s Day – but these are small quibbles; that’s how a retail business works.

But to throw its enormous weight behind a marginal group (but which also has a determined and sinister political agenda) that does not in the least reflect the huge majority of its customers – why?

[…]

Good question.

Posted in Throwing a Nutty | Tagged ,
32 Comments

You have got to be JOKING!

This photo sold at Christie’s for – I am not making this up …

$4,338,500!

Lot Description

ANDREAS GURSKY (B. 1955)
Rhein II
signed ‘Andreas Gursky’ (on a paper label affixed to the backing board)
chromogenic color print face-mounted to Plexiglas
image: 73 x 143 in. (185.4 x 363.5 cm.)
overall: 81 x 151a x 2 in. (207 x 385.5 x 6.2 cm.)
Executed in 1999. This work is number one from an edition of six.

Other works from this edition are in the collection of the Museum of Modern Art, New York; Pinakothek der Moderne, Munich; Tate Modern, London and the Glenstone Collection, Potomac.

UPDATE:

I am auctioning this photo.

Bidding begins at $1,000,000.

UPDATE:

The bidding is now up to $1,000,000.50!

It is also possible simply to give me money, which is pretty much the same as buying the photo.

Here.  I’ll make it easier.



Posted in Throwing a Nutty |
43 Comments

CWN – Irish foreign minister: Pope not invited for 2012 visit

From CWN:

Irish foreign minister: Pope not invited for 2012 visit
November 09, 2011

A papal visit to Ireland in 2012 now seems unlikely, in light of a public statement by the country’s foreign minister that the government does not plan to extend an invitation to the Pontiff.

Pope Benedict would be in “a very diplomatically difficult situation” if he planned to travel to Ireland without an invitation from the government, remarked Father Kevin Doran, the secretary-general of the International Eucharistic Congress. The organizers of that Congress had hoped that the Pope would travel to Dublin for the event, which is scheduled for June 2012. Earlier this year Vatican officials were in Dublin, reportedly making final arrangements for the papal trip.

However, in October the foreign minister, Eamon Gilmore, answered a question in parliament by saying that an invitation had not been extended to Pope Benedict “nor is one currently under active consideration.”

Relations between the Irish government and the Holy See have been deteriorating since July, when Prime Minister Enda Kenny loosed a blistering attack on the Vatican in a parliamentary address. Last week the Irish government announced the closing of its embassy at the Holy See–although political leaders claimed that the move was a budget-cutting measure.

Posted in The Last Acceptable Prejudice | Tagged , , ,
23 Comments

Coach Paterno – WDTPRS POLL

UPDATE 10 Nov 0320 GMT:

I just saw a news flash that Penn State has sacked Joe Paterno effective immediately.  I’ll close the poll, below.

___

Hugh Hewitt tonight is covering the situation with Penn State and Joe Paterno.  There is also a lot of discussion of the scandals that have torn at the Church.

I have read a bit of the grand jury report on Jerry Sandusky, to which Hewitt linked, and I had to stop.

Paterno knew everything.  Paterno had been told about Sandusky when he was seen … I don’t even want to write it.

Mr. Hewitt is asking callers …

Should Coach Joe Paterno be allowed to coach the rest of the season?

  • No. (76%, 319 Votes)
  • Yes. (25%, 106 Votes)

Total Voters: 421

Posted in Clerical Sexual Abuse, POLLS | Tagged ,
58 Comments

EAS and EAS… ?!? Coincidence? You decide!

Something odd happened today.   I watch very little TV during the day but sometimes if I am making lunch or doing something in the kitchen I switch it on to see if something interesting is going on.

As I watched, this guy popped up:

Great choice of color of the text with that background, right?  And some people think the US government should run even more aspects of our lives.

In any event he announced that there would be a test of the Emergency Alert System.  I don’t remember ever seeing anything like this on TV, though it happens on the radio occasionally.

A few minutes later this popped up:

This was a surreal experience because of the music playing while this was on the screen.

VIDEO.

I used my wonderful ReplayTV I have been nursing along for years to go back and pick up some of the lyrics, which I then searched out on the internet.

The result: Paparazzi by Lady Gaga.

Weird.  Wouldn’t you think there would be some message telling us what was going on rather than Lady Gaga?

Is it possible that this test failed?

So… we haven’t ever had tests on TV of the “EAS”.  What was this all about?

BTW… we were still here to see this test.  The huge planet killing asteroid travelling 29K mph inside the orbit of the Moon did NOT … I repeat… did NOT strike the Earth, killing us all by fiery death and floods and other death inflicting killer catastrophic annihilation scenarios.

So… Emergency Alert System and Earth Annihilating Stone …. both are EAS and they both whizzed by in a 24 hour period.  Wow.

Coincidence?

[wp_youtube]IRoh62wRgkc[/wp_youtube]

Posted in Global Killer Asteroid Questions, Lighter fare, Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged , , ,
25 Comments

QUAERITUR: Are Eastern Catholics also “Roman” Catholics?

From a reader:

Are ALL Catholics, (Eastern Rite Church) considered Roman Catholics? Or do they go by the name of the rite, like Maronite Rite Catholics? Had to answer this question in school, and didn’t know the difference.

I am not an Eastern Church priest and so I am not well-versed in what they say about themselves.   I believe that they go by “Maronite Catholic”, “Ukrainian Catholic” and so forth.

They are all “Roman” in the strict sense that they all are in union with the Roman Pontiff, that is to say, they are not allied with Orthodox Churches.  However, even though they are with the Roman Pontiff, I do not believe they would ever want to be called “Roman” Catholic as if they were subjects of the Latin Church and used the Roman Rite.  They have their own identity in their Churches.

Perhaps some Eastern Catholic readers can jump in with their observations.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged ,
49 Comments