London impromptu, brief “Blognic” possible this (Friday) afternoon! UNDERWAY!

CLICK

I will be in central London today on sundry errands and quests. Should anyone like to meet for a pint in the afternoon, I will be

17:30 at The Coal Hole.

Also, I am forwarding my London phone number (020… or Skype call to “WDTPRS”) – found on the left side bar of this blog – to my mobile. You can also text to 07501852559.

Only a couple more days here! Sniff.

Impromptu Blognic

  • No! Alas, I'd love to but I can't make it. (76%, 141 Votes)
  • No! I wouldn't be caught dead with you lot. (12%, 22 Votes)
  • Yes! Best idea I've heard today! Sounds like fun! (6%, 12 Votes)
  • No way! Are you out of your mind? Who cares? (3%, 5 Votes)
  • Yes! I'll stop in for a bit. (2%, 3 Votes)
  • Yes! And I am buying for everyone! Huzzah! (2%, 3 Votes)

Total Voters: 186

UPDATE 1123 London Time:

Two people have already sent me texts with their intention to come!

UPDATE 1409 London Time:

I’ve had a couple voicemails from people wanting to confirm the time and place. Yes, as above! I don’t know if we will be upstairs or down. Down was pretty warm last time.

UPDATE 2005 London Time:

It was a great small impromptu blognic. Thanks for coming!

20111014-200649.jpg

20111014-200703.jpg

20111014-200717.jpg

20111014-200727.jpg

20111014-200740.jpg

20111014-200756.jpg

Off to the grocery for provisions. Cooking again!

Posted in Blognics |
9 Comments

QUAERITUR: People who arrive at Mass really late and then go to Communion

From a reader:

During the Agnus Dei at Mass this morning, two unfamiliar teenage
girls and a man, who I suspect to be their father, entered our rather
small church and made their way to a pew.
I was saddened to see as I returned to my seat after receiving Holy
Communion that the aforesaid trio were presenting themselves to
recieve, and that even though our priest knew they’d arrived late, he
went ahead and distributed the Eucharist to them.

So my question is this: Should the priest have quietly explained to
them that they couldn’t receive as they reached the front of the
“queue,” or should he have distributed HC, and sought them out
immediately after Mass with a view to correcting them in private?

How do you see the laity’s role in all this?

There are several points here to consider.

Many people are poorly catechized. The don’t realize that they should not receive if they are not properly disposed. They are not receiving in a sense of defiance of the Church’s good order.

We have to balance our desire to pursue the perfect with a need in prudence to achieve slowly but surely what it possible, always with an eye on the restrictions of fraternal correction.

What is the role of the laity in this regard?

I would say pretty close to ZERO.

If a person is well-known, doing this often, and is a friend, then perhaps bring it up.  Otherwise, leave this sort of thing to the priest and the person involved.   We usually can’t make a good guess at the individual’s disposition to receive.  Normally, people complete their preparation for reception by their participation during Mass.  But, that isn’t always the only way.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
66 Comments

Forty Days For Life in London

Seminarians and others at Bedford Square in London during Forty Days For Life.

20111014-144126.jpg

20111014-144208.jpg

20111014-144235.jpg

Posted in Emanations from Penumbras, Our Catholic Identity, The future and our choices |
4 Comments

QUAERITUR: Using a different set of mysteries during communal recitation of the Rosary.

From a reader:

I prayed the Rosary with some others today, but since it was Thursday they used the Luminous Mysteries. I, however, meditated on the Joyful Mysteries. Is that legit? Would I still qualify for an indulgence if I was meditating on different mysteries from the others?

Yes.  I think you would.

Go ahead and meditate on this or that set of mysteries as it pleaseth you.

An argument can be made for having everyone on the same page. Communal recitation does imply doing something in common, right? Some people might find it a bit distracting or disharmonious to have meditations on a different set of mysteries going on. That said, if you want to do your own thing, then do it. Of course that undermines a little the communal aspect of recitation of the Rosary, but… whatever.

I know that some people have not embraced the “Luminous Mysteries” for their own meditation. Fine.  They don’t have to use them if they don’t want to.  The mysteries are suggestions for our benefit, not iron-clad channels into which we are forced.

Our devotions don’t require perfect lockstep with everyone else.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , ,
9 Comments

Conversations we have to have about Communion under both kinds.

The debate about U.S. bishops making the decision to follow the Church’s laws about Communion under both kinds continues.

We need a conversation about several points.  Let us today limit ourselves to one (which means we don’t need the introduction of “And a different point is….”).  We can have conversations about some other aspects of this debate under different entries.

First, I wonder if the high dudgeon about Bp. Olmsted and Bp. Morlino is less about Communion under both kinds and more about having as many lay people involved as EMHCs as possible.

I am guessing those who object to the decisions of the aforementioned bishops have figured out that by curtailing Communion under both kinds, the occasions and numbers of Extraordinary Ministers will also be reduced.  Some people have the false notion that “active participation” means “doing stuff”.  They want lots of lay people in the sanctuary doing things, stepping into the role the priest is supposed to fulfill.

This is a conversation we need to have.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, I'm just askin'..., Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, The Drill | Tagged ,
54 Comments

QUAERITUR: A host found on the altar after Mass.

From a reader:

This morning I attended a Mass that was celebrated by a VERY old priest; just a simple daily Mass, nothing fancy, no smells or bells.

When it came time for the prayers of consecration, it seemed as if the priest could not find the “larger” host, so he used one the smaller
ones. All is well.

BUT after Mass when the sacristan was bringing everything back to the sacristy, I watched him pick up a host from the very end of the altar and bring it back to the sacristy. My first thought was, “wait a
second, I think that host is consecrated!”

So my question is, do all hosts that are present on the altar, whether they are directly involved in the prayers of consecration or not, become the Body and Blood?

Thank you, this has been buggin’ me all day. Just say the word and
I’ll break into that sacristy to save the True Presence from the pile
of non-Jesus wafers.

In general, the well-trained priest intends to consecrate what is placed within the confines of the corporal spread on the altar. He makes a moral intention to consecrate what stands on the corporal. He could intend to consecrate other elements as well, but usually the corporal provides a standard “consecration zone”, as it were.

However, it may that a consecrated Host got away during the consolidation of two partially filled ciboria. I can’t say anything more about that possibility.  Who knows?

Where there is doubt in cases like this, the finder could consume the host in question or, taking it to the priest or, in the case of a sacristan, he himself could place it in a cup of water. When entirely dissolved, the liquid is poured down the sacrarium.

When you find a host somewhere other than on the altar itself or in the sacristy, it might be a good idea to assume that it was consecrated and carried away by some person and thrown away.

Finally, if you know that throwing away the Eucharist, or giving or selling it to someone else is the gravest of sins and one that incurs an excommunication, you in fact incur latae sententiae – by the very fact of doing it – an excommunication, the lifting of which is reserved to the Holy See or a confessor to whom the Holy See has given the faculty.  The Holy See, not the local bishop.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , , , ,
4 Comments

Pipe Organs and a famous Chicago church

There is an interesting video on YouTube about the pipe organ project going on at St. John Cantius in Chicago.

If you don’t know much about pipe organs, you could learn a few things from this 12 minute video.

Remember: the pipe organ is mentioned by the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council as the instrument which has pride of place for sacred music.

[wp_youtube]e5EKqjgQw6g[/wp_youtube]

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Brick by Brick | Tagged , ,
12 Comments

The new, corrected translation and deaf people

"ALL"

Even a bait-less hook will sometimes snag a catch.  The National Catholic Fishwrap has a somewhat interesting story about deaf communities getting ready to receive the new, corrected translation of the Missale Romanum.

Stop and think about it.  If the text of Mass changes, they too will see changes when it is “signed”.  Right?

You can read the article there, but here is an interesting bit from the end:

"MANY"

Like the spoken words at Mass, some of the changes for deaf Mass-goers will be subtle, others more profound. For example, in Eucharistic Prayer I, at the consecration of the wine, the words change from “the cup” to “this precious chalice.”
“Cup” is a relatively simple sign that could also mean glass or pint, but “chalice” has a more formal connotation to it, so one sign for “chalice” outlines the shape of a chalice.
Pictured are the changes, also in Eucharistic Prayer I, where the priest used to say Jesus’ blood “will be shed for you and for all.” The new translation says Jesus’ blood “will be shed for you and for many.”

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged , , ,
28 Comments

Prayer for a procrastinator?

From a reader:

Could you please say a prayer for me?

I have a really bad vice of procrastination [from the Latin cras, “tomorrow”] that has gotten me into a heap of trouble at school and even frequent confession hasn’t helped. I’m still under academic probation from last year’s effects of procrastination. I can’t afford to lose my internship and get kicked out of school in my graduation year.

I’ve got the elbow grease and a novena to St. Expeditus to get me through the lag work of paper writing, but sadly it’s at the sacrifice of Thursday and Friday night Mass, so I need all the extra help I can get.

A prayer for you? About procrastination?

Sure, I guess I’ll eventually get around to it.  Maybe tomorrow?

Seriously, I always pray, right away, for people who ask for prayers.

Posted in Lighter fare | Tagged
30 Comments

WDTPRS POLL – Preferences for reception of Communion: from priest or EMHC

Under another thread an idea for a WDTPRS was raised.  Please choose your answer and give your reasons in the combox, below.

Because this can be a delicate topic, I ask that you DO NOT ENGAGE each other in the combox.  Just state your own position without commenting on the comments of others in any way.  Pretend the other comments do not exist.

Preferences for reception of Holy Communion, I receive from...

View Results

And just because someone will fail to pay attention to this, I’ll repeat:  Pretend the other comments do not exist.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, POLLS | Tagged , ,
157 Comments