WDTPRS – 23rd Ordinary Sunday: Submission, manumission, filiation

roman sarcophagus man sonThe Collect for the 23rd Ordinary Sunday – this Sunday – was not in any pre-Conciliar edition of the Roman Missal, but it was in the 8th century Gelasian Sacramentary in a section for evening prayers during Paschaltide.

You have to wonder how they – the cutting and pasting experts – made these decisions.

Deus, per quem nobis et redemptio venit et praestatur adoptio, filios dilectionis tuae benignus intende, ut in Christo credentibus et vera tribuatur libertas, et hereditas aeterna.

Take note of the lovely chiasms (so-called because, stylistically, they form a X or Greek chi): redemptio venit…praestatur adoptio (subject verb… verb subject) and also vera libertas…hereditas aeterna (adjective noun…noun adjective).  And the two passives make a nice bridge.

It is brilliantly crafted and typically terse, according to the Roman genius.

chiasmus

Vocabulary connections suggest to me Patristic sources for this prayer (e.g., in St Hilary of Poitiers (+ c. 368) de trin 6, 44; St Ambrose of Milan (+ 397) ep 9, 65, 5).

Praesto, -iti, -atum means effectively “to stand before or in front”.   It has a wide range of meanings, however, including “to fulfill, discharge, maintain, perform, execute” and concepts surrounding the same, making praesto a little confusing.  The lexicographer Souter says that in about the 2nd century praesto meant, “lend” (like French “prêter”) and from the 4th century onward “offer”.  Cassiodorus (+ c. 583) and other authors use praesto for “help, aid, give”.   A. Blaise suggests the French “accorder” when praesto concerns God.  Some weeks ago, (19th Sunday) we saw adoptioHereditas can be, “heirship” or the inheritance, the patrimony, itself.

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973):

God our Father, you redeem us, and make us your children in Christ. Look upon us, give us true freedom and bring us to the inheritance you promised.

BTW.. in all the years that I wrote these columns, I constantly reminded people that the slavishly literal versions I provided week in and week out were intended to help you see how the Latin works, to get the bones of the prayers, for the sake of comparing and contrasting more easily the official translations..  They were never intended to be liturgically ready versions… even though they were often better than what we got!  So, keep that in mind.  They are workhorses, merely.

SUPER LITERAL RENDERING:

O God, through whom to us come both redemption and adoption is guaranteed, kindly give attention to your beloved children, so that both true freedom and the inheritance everlasting may be bestowed on those believing in Christ.

See what I did in there?

CURRENT ICEL (2011):

O God, by whom we are redeemed and receive adoption, look graciously upon your beloved sons and daughters, that those who believe in Christ may receive true freedom and an everlasting inheritance.

What do you think?

By the fact of our unity with Christ in His and our common human nature, the way to divine sonship was opened up to us by the Father in Christ.

Christ is the Father’s Son by nature, we are sons and daughters by grace.

Our adoption through grace is “perfect” (adoptio perfecta) because it complete. Perfecta is from perficio, “bring to an end or conclusion, finish, complete”.  From God’s point of view our adoption is perfect because He puts His mark upon us, especially in baptism and confirmation.  Since God is not limited by time and for Him there are no past or future distinct from the present, He sees in perfection the results of every gift of adoption.  From our point of view adoption will only be completed when we see Him face to face.  Because of baptism the Father’s mark is sealed into us forever.  In this marvelous adoption the Holy Spirit brings the Father and Son to us when He takes up His rightful place in our souls, thus creating the perfect communion, even family, within our souls.

Today’s Collect has its foundation certainly in the New Testament imagery of adoption, but I think it also flows out of ancient Roman legal concepts of manumission and adoption, freeing of slaves and adoption of heirs.

Ancient prayers rang differently in the ancient ears than they do in ours.  Trying to get the content that rang then to ring also today is tricky.  Sometimes it can’t be done, and still retain the prayer’s concision, a characteristic of the Roman style.

Let’s bang our hammer on the bell that is “adoption” for a while and see what rings out.

Our adoption by God takes us out of slavery and gives us a new status as free members of the Church and as sons and daughters.  Baptism confers this freedom, membership, and adoption.

Even natural children of a father in ancient Rome required the father’s recognition (Latin recognitio – which is what today’s Motu Proprio on translation dealt with!) before they were legally considered to be his legitimate children and heirs with any rights.  Adoption could grant those same rights and privileges.  Roman adoptio removed a person from one familia and put him in another, while adrogatio legally placed people not under the power of a parent into a familia, thus placing them under the authority of the paterfamilias.  In Latin, a familia is a house and all belonging to it, a family estate, family property, fortune.  A familia had a head, the paterfamilias (or –familiae, the –as being a Greek genitive), the master of the house.

The baptized are no longer subject to Satan and destined for hell, but are now under new mastership of God.

In Rome there was also an “adoption” by being named an heir with the right of taking the name of the one bequeathing the patrimony.  However, this was not an adoption in the fullest sense: you became heir of the father’s name and property without the other powers of a paterfamilias until they were confirmed by magistrates, etc.

Even after baptism our state can be deepened through confirmation.

Ancient slaves could be freed, but that did not make them Roman citizens with the greater rights.  By baptism, we become citizens of heaven, members of the family of the Church.  Not only are we free, but we gain even the chance of eternal salvation.

In ancient Roman a slave could become a citizen through certain types of manumission, by adoption, through military service, or a special grant to a community or territory.  In a way, we have undergone all of these: by laying His hand on us (manus “hand” and mittere), we have been freed.  We have been made sons and daughters of a heavenly Father.

We are now soldiers in the Church militant.

By membership of the society of the Church, a holy and priestly People, we gain privileges and obligations.   God has recognized us as His own children with a perfect adoption.  This is true freedom and true heirship, excluding nothing and, in some sense, lavishing on us even more than we might have had before we fell under the Devil’s dominion through sin.

This is a difficult mystery to grasp: we are already sons and daughters in a perfect sonship by adoption, but that sonship is not yet complete: we lack the final essential component, that is, perseverance in faith and obedience for the whole course of our lives and their ratification in death and our particular judgment.

It is through many trials that we come to the perfection of adoption which we now share in an imperfectly perfect way.

These collects during the summer, during Ordinary time, contain reminders of who we are and, therefore, what we are to do.

Christ reveals both.

Posted in WDTPRS |
1 Comment

Beatification homily for John Paul I: just another occasion to bash people who love Tradition

Today there was a ceremony held in St. Peter’s Square for the beatification of the short-lived Pope everyone forgets to remember, John Paul I, Luciani (+1978).

In his sermon for the event, Francis seems to have doubled down on the message of Biden’s speech that was shouted against the luciferian red background.

Capita anche oggi: specialmente nei momenti di crisi personale e sociale, quando siamo più esposti a sentimenti di rabbia o siamo impauriti da qualcosa che minaccia il nostro futuro, diventiamo più vulnerabili; e, così, sull’onda dell’emozione, ci affidiamo a chi con destrezza e furbizia sa cavalcare questa situazione, approfittando delle paure della società e promettendoci di essere il “salvatore” che risolverà i problemi, mentre in realtà vuole accrescere il proprio gradimento e il proprio potere, la propria figura, la propria capacità di avere le cose in pugno.

[…]

The same thing happens today, at times of personal or societal crisis, when we are especially prey to feelings of anger or we fear things that threaten our future. We become more susceptible and thus, on the tide of emotion, we look to those who can shrewdly take advantage of the situation, profiting from society’s fears and promising to be the “saviour” who can solve all its problems, whereas in reality they are looking for wider approval and for greater power, based on the impression they make, their ability to have things in hand.

I’m pretty sure this is a shot at Bad Orange Man with a touch of self-projection, perhaps.

And then there’s this.

Con il sorriso Papa Luciani è riuscito a trasmettere la bontà del Signore. È bella una Chiesa con il volto lieto, il volto sereno, il volto sorridente, una Chiesa che non chiude mai le porte, che non inasprisce i cuori, che non si lamenta e non cova risentimento, non è arrabbiata, non è insofferente, non si presenta in modo arcigno, non soffre di nostalgie del passato cadendo nell’indietrismo.

[…]

With a smile, Pope John Paul managed to communicate the goodness of the Lord. How beautiful is a Church with a happy, serene and smiling face, a Church that never closes doors, never hardens hearts, never complains or harbours resentment, does not grow angry or impatient, does not look dour or suffer nostalgia for the past, falling into an attitude of going backwards.

What a beautiful image Francis has of so many people who just want to have traditional worship.  Truly the heart of a pastor.

Meanwhile, Francis can really draw those big crowds.  The weather in the morning wasn’t perfect, but… sheesh.

Compare and contrast with the beatification of other Popes.   Even the not so beloved Paul VI.

Do we really need a photo of the crowd for John Paul II, beatified by Pope Benedict XVI in 2011?

Here are the overflow crowds near Castel Sant’Angelo.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
13 Comments

VIDEO: Another example of Francis “unique expression” of Novus Ordo (turn your volume down or you will frighten the dogs of the neighborhood)

The Vetus Ordo is against Vatican II! That’s why it has to be crushed and the people who want it marginalized and demoralized to the point that they will quite simply leave the Church. Instead, what will bring about the Vatican II springtime of joy we have been waiting for since 1965, the closure of that pivotal moment that reinterpreted the entire history, doctrine and worship of Christianity, is the only, that is to say, the unique expression of the Roman Rite, the Novus Ordo as interpreted hereunder in a video from Sacred Heart Church in Omaha.

Notable moments in a “Celebration of Life” for a deceased priest.  If anyone does anything remotely like this for me, I will haunt you for the rest of your natural lives.

From the beginning there are a string of “eulogies”.

55:00 Gloria… this is truly hideous.

1:05:00 end of the Gospel (turn your volume down a little or you are certain to frighten the dogs of the neighborhood

1:25:00 Super oblata and beginning of Eucharistic Prayer

1:32:00 End of Eucharistic Prayer

1:33:00 Our Father (get a barf bag)

1:36:00 Sign of Peace chaos

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Pò sì jiù, The future and our choices, You must be joking! | Tagged
19 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes: 13th Sunday after Pentecost (N.O. 23rd Sunday)

Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all. Share the good stuff.

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at your Mass of obligation for the 13th Sunday after Pentecost (23rd Ordinary in the Novus)?

Tell about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass.  I hear that it is growing.  Of COURSE.

Any local changes or (hopefully good) news?

A few thoughts of my own, HERE.

In this Sunday’s Gospel Christ leads a lawyer down a steep path into a gentle mugging with the Truth.

In medias res

[…]

Holy Mass, particularly as celebrated – these days in particular – with the Vetus Ordo, more clearly manifests the fact it is not focused on man. It is focused on God. Certainly, we participate at Holy Mass because we desire that transforming touch in our encounter with divine mystery. But it is not the usefulness of Mass as being transformational that is primary. It is the religious rightness of being there, in awe-filled gratitude, for the sake of God. Of course, the one does not exclude the other, such is the magnificent love of our God. Paradoxically, the more we allow Mass to be less about ourselves, then the more it affects us. Our “active participation” in Holy Mass is rooted in our active receptivity, our outpouring of self that opens for the inpouring of what God wants to give.

[…]

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
3 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 552, etc.

Someone asked in email what I am reading right now.  I just finished a reading, after decades, of Thomas Merton’s Seven Storey Mountain.  [US HERE– UK HERE] It was lyrically beautiful.

Also, in the evening, I am working my way though Trent: What Happened at the Council by John O’Malley.  [US HERE – UK HERE] Not exactly the most conservative of scholars, but he has done his homework.  What really impressed me was his laying out of the context, leading up to the Council of Trent.

This impressed me:

Fifty days to elect Clement VII. Two days to elect his successor. Why such a contrast? Cardinals from contending camps converged in their dismay over Clement’s seemingly shilly-shallying policies, which many blamed for the sack of Rome. More important, the mood had shifted. Concern, even panic, over what the future might hold was widespread. The sack, a portent of worse things to come? The Turks, seemingly unstoppable on the eastern frontier, controlled the eastern Mediterranean and raided southern Italian cities almost at will. The Schmalkaldic League threatened war in Germany. Luther was still at large. His teachings had spread far and wide throughout northern Europe and, the unthinkable, had penetrated even into Italy. England was in schism. In this perilous time the French king seemed to be playing a duplicitous game. Something had to change. In Alessandro Farnese, who at sixty-seven was the oldest participant in the conclave, the others saw a man they thought was up to the task. Farnese had been a cardinal since 1492, for forty-two years. He knew the ropes and knew how to make them work. Widely respected for his diplomatic skills, his firmness of purpose, his intelligence, and his good judgment, he had not hidden his disagreements with Clement’s political policies or Clement’s disregard of his advice. In the rivalry between Charles and Francis, he believed the Holy See needed to maintain a policy of absolute neutrality. He had long and publically proclaimed the necessity of a council. He seemed to be the man of the hour. Shortly after his election as Paul III, he announced three goals for his pontificate….

Meanwhile,

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.

US HERE – UK HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
3 Comments

YOUR URGENT PRAYER REQUESTS

PLEASE use the sharing buttons! Thanks!

In your charity would you please take a moment look at the requests and to pray for the people about whom you read?

Continued from THESE.

Let’s remember all who are ill, who will die soon, who have lost their jobs, and who are afraid.

I get many requests by email asking for prayers. Some are heart-achingly grave and urgent.

As long as my blog reaches so many readers in so many places, let’s give each other a hand. We should support each other in works of mercy.

If you have some prayer requests, feel free to post them below.

You have to be registered here to be able to post.

I ask a prayer for myself.  I’m dealing with a particular challenge right now.

Also, I received this note today:

Phillip Douglas Steinacker, of Baltimore MD, a long time ZedHead, passionate Catholic, one-on-one evangelist (he could not stop himself), and good friend who introduced me to your awesome blog, died peacefully of cancer on August 24, 2022.  Phil occasionally contributed comments, and was a fan.  I just wanted to share.

While I am sad to hear of the passing away of a long-time participant here, I am glad to receive the news so that we can pray for the repose of his soul.  Should any of his family or friends see this, please know that readers here will surely stop and say a prayer.

Posted in Urgent Prayer Requests |
6 Comments

1 Sept: On the anniversary of a very creepy thing, two very creepy things happened

Sometimes coincidences are just coincidences. Sometimes they aren’t.

Yesterday, 1 September, on the anniversary of a very creepy thing, two very creepy things happened.

1- Francis gave a speech to the world’s bishops, more an more reduced to “branch managers” disguised as a speech to the Italian Association of Professors and Experts of Liturgy. HERE

2- Biden gave a speech to his base disguised as a speech to the nation. Transcript from Hell’s Bible (NYT) HERE Video from C-SPAN (D-SPIN?) HERE

Let’s have a look at some excerpts.

Francis:

Progress in understanding and also in liturgical celebration must always be rooted in tradition, which always carries you forward in that sense that the Lord wants. [He knows!] There is a spirit that is not that of true tradition: the worldly spirit of “backwardsing[indietrismo… but wait for it….], fashionable today: [There it is.  “It’s a fad.”] thinking that going to the roots means going back. No, they are different things. If you go to the roots, the roots take you up, always. Like the tree, which grows from what comes from its roots. And tradition is really going to the roots, because it is the guarantee of the future, as Mahler said. Instead, backwardsing means going back two steps because “it has always been done like this” is better. [Weird word salad at this point.] It is a temptation in the life of the Church that leads you to a worldly restorationism, disguised as liturgy and theology, but it is worldly. And backwardsing is always worldliness: this is why the author of the Letter to the Hebrews says: “We are not people who go backwards”. No, you go on, according to the line that tradition gives you. To go back is to go against the truth and also against the Spirit. Make this distinction well. Because in the liturgy there are many who say they are “according to tradition”, but this is not the case: at most they will be traditionalists. [Get it?  But they are not Christians!  Nice.] Another said that tradition is the living faith of the dead, traditionalism is the dead faith of some living. They kill that contact with the roots by going back. Be careful: today the temptation is backwardsing disguised as tradition.

This is incoherent.  Think about this. It’s just a fad, he says.  We see this popping up in publications like Hell’s Bible. The writer opined that right now being a traditional Catholic is chic, fashionable, like being in a cool club. [Julia Yost of First ThingsThe Atlantic nut implied the same with bizzare smears and fearmongering.  It is becoming a talking point, almost like there is coordination.  Traditionalists are being painted as people to be feared, as dangerous people who kill the roots.

Also, if it just a fad, then why worry about it?  It will pass, if it is a fad.  So why all the terror rhetoric and name calling?

BTW… “indietrismo” is not an Italian word.  So, translating it is not easy.  “Backwardsing”, to my ear, sounds almost as stupid as “indietrismo”, so that’s my choice, at least today.

Also, about going backwards.  Apparently, if you go to the roots, that’s okay.  But if you go just two steps, that’s not okay.  It seems that desiring the Tridentine Mass, the Vetus Ordo, is going back only two steps.  Never mind that the Vetus Ordo substantially goes back the time of St. Gregory the Great (+604).  So, going to to the roots is… beyond that?  I am minded of Pius XII and Mediator Dei 62 and the errors of the Council of Pistoia.

He is working from a false premise, namely, that those who desire the Vetus Ordo desire it because “it has always been done this way”, that they don’t want any change because change is bad.  That is, by the way, a deeply Roman point of view reflected in the fact that in Latin the word for new “novus” generally carries a negative connotation.  For example, res novae which literally is “new things” is the term for “revolution”, which is always negative in the Roman mind.  That does not mean nihil innovetur sic et simpliciter.  It means as Benedict XV said and Pius XII repeated in Si diligis, “We wish this maxim of our elders held in reverence: Nihil innovetur nisi quod traditum est (Let nothing new be introduced but only what has been handed down); it must be held as an inviolable law in matters of faith, and should also control those points which allow of change, though in these latter for the most part the rule holds: Non nova sed noviter (Not new things but in a new way).”  The NOVUS Ordo (not my term) was not “handed down”, it was “cobbled up”.  It does not reflect the mandates of the Council Fathers in the document of the Council Sacrosanctum Concilium.  Those who desire traditional liturgy want it because they perceive it to be richer, more spiritually nourishing in many respects, more accessible and less of a distraction away from that which is sacred because of its stability.

But, what’s it going to be?   Are those who want tradition just involved in a passing fad or are they just clinging to old stuff because they can’t stand change?  Which is it going to be?

The entire paragraph is incoherent.  However, he has several times gone off like this on traditional Catholics, with the name calling and vilification, the insulting insinuations about their motives and even intelligence.  He has coined a neologism as a club with which his agents can beat their opposition.  And their opposition are one of the only healthy and growing and obviously practicing demographics in a demographically dying Church.  Watch for more of this even as more dictates come from Rome down to what are now more and more branch managers requiring them to snuff out resistance.

Biden:

[…]

But first, we must be honest with each other and with ourselves.

Too much of what’s happening in our country today is not normal. Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our Republic.  [No no.  This isn’t fearmongering at all.]

Now, I want to be very clear, very clear up front. Not every Republican, not even the majority of Republicans, are MAGA Republicans. Not every Republican embraces their extreme ideology. I know, because I’ve been able to work with these mainstream Republicans.  [Read: RINOs.]

But there’s no question that the Republican Party today is dominated, driven and intimidated by Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans. And that is a threat to this country.

[…]

And here, in my view, is what is true: MAGA Republicans [This moniker, which we are going to hear all the time now, is not like the jovially contemptuous “Brandon”.  This is something else entirely.] do not respect the Constitution. They do not believe in the rule of law. They do not recognize the will of the people. They refuse to accept the results of a free election, and they’re working right now as I speak in state after state to give power to decide elections in America to partisans and cronies, empowering election deniers to undermine democracy itself.

MAGA forces are determined to take this country backwards, backwards to an America where there is no right to choose, no right to privacy, no right to contraception, no right to marry who you love. They promote authoritarian leaders, and they fanned the flames of political violence that are a threat to our personal rights, to the pursuit of justice, to the rule of law, to the very soul of this country.

They look at the mob that stormed the United States Capitol on Jan. 6, brutally attacking law enforcement, [WHO attacked law enforcement?!?] not as insurrectionists who placed a dagger at the throat of our democracy, but they look at them as patriots. And they see their MAGA failure to stop a peaceful transfer of power after the 2020 election as preparation for the 2022 and 2024 elections.  [This is serious “fear of other” rhetoric.]

They tried everything last time to nullify the votes of 81 million people. [living and dead!  real and fictitious!] This time, they’re determined to succeed in thwarting the will of the people. That’s why respected conservatives like Federal Circuit Court Judge Michael Luttig has called Trump and the extreme MAGA Republicans “a clear and present danger” to our democracy[Mind you, as he said these things, he was standing in front of Independence Hall in Philly which was illuminated as blood red and there were two Marines standing behind him.  Implication?  To hell with posse comitatus when it comes to these dangerous MAGA Republicans.]

But while the threat to American democracy is real, I want to say as clearly as we can, we are not powerless in the face of these threats. We are not bystanders in this ongoing attack on democracy. There are far more Americans, far more Americans from every background and belief, who reject the extreme MAGA ideology than those that accept it. And folks, it’s within our power, it’s in our hands, yours and mine, to stop the assault on American democracy.

I believe America is at an inflection point, one of those moments that determine the shape of everything that’s to come after. And now, America must choose to move forward or to move backwards, to build a future or obsess about the past, [“obsess about the past”] to be a nation of hope and unity and optimism or a nation of fear, division and of darkness.

MAGA Republicans have made their choice. They embrace anger. They thrive on chaos. They live, not in the light of truth but in the shadow of lies. But together, together, we can choose a different path. We can choose a better path forward to the future, a future of possibility, a future to build a dream and hope, and we’re on that path moving ahead. [And how is that going with his administration?]

I know this nation. I know you, the American people. I know your courage, I know your hearts, and I know our history. This is a nation that honors our Constitution. We do not reject it. This is a nation that believes in the rule of law. We do not repudiate it. This is a nation that respects free and fair elections. We honor the will of the people. We do not deny it. And this is a nation that rejects violence as a political tool. We do not encourage violence. We are still an America that believes in honesty and decency and respect for others. Patriotism, liberty, justice for all, hope, possibilities — we are still at our core a democracy.  [When he says they/we do not deny the rule of law or promote violence, it means that they are going to deny the rule of law and promote violence.]

[…]

The picture he has painted here, against the bloody background, is fearmongering fantasy.  The speech was labeled by C-SPAN as “remarks on democracy”.  Instead it could have been called “remarks on ‘the MAGA Republican’ question'”.  Two months out from the midterms, his numbers tanking, his handlers have created the talking points for distribution to the MSM and have crafted a snappy nickname for his opponents for constant vilification.  As I mentioned, this is not jovially contemptuous “Brandon”.  This is something else and it is aimed at – literally – millions of Americans.  Anyone who didn’t vote for him or who won’t vote for dems in the future are un-American.  They are threats to democracy, the rule of law, and to contraception.  Anyway, this means for the time being a constant rhetorical blitzkrieg in the MSM and securing victory in the midterms by whatever means necessary.  Make America MAGA-REIN.

I am reminded of the fact that on 1 September 1939 a speech was made to the Reichstag which effectively blamed every other nation for the need for a military build up to protect German interests.  They forced us to invade Poland!

As Ben Shapiro remarked about Biden’s speech, “It was better in the original German.”

Posted in Francis, Our Catholic Identity, Pò sì jiù, SESSIUNCULA, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices, What are they REALLY saying? | Tagged ,
28 Comments

Catholic Military Assoc of Our Lady of Victories app called “Military Connect”

I received this email…

By way of a quick update (and perhaps you would be good enough to mention this on the blog), The Catholic Military Assoc of Our Lady of Victories has now gone live with an app called “Military Connect” developed by the Apostolat Militaire International and Tweeting with GOD in conjunction with members of the AMI including the CMA, is LIVE.

The app has been endorsed by the Holy See, with a message from Pope Francis via Secretary of State H.E. Cardinal Parolin stating that he hopes it will help to “make the situations in which military personnel are involved more human and Christian”.

The free app is currently available in both the Google Play and App stores, for smartphones and tablets, in 8 languages (English, Italian, French, Spanish, Croatian, German, Portuguese and Dutch).

The App offers:

Strong Catholic prayers
Answers to 200+ questions about faith and being a military Catholic
Prayers specifically for the military
Testimonies from serving Catholics
Inspiring military Saints and quotes
Guidance for preparing for Mass and Confession
Spiritual first aid
Users from member countries can contact a Military Chaplain and their Associations directly from the app
The facility to upload spiritual reading
Downloaded content so that it can be accessed on deployment etc

With our prayers and best wishes from the CMA

Posted in The Campus Telephone Pole |
1 Comment

The Novus Ordo is the unique expression?

The oppressors of the faithful who desire the Vetus Ordo, on the obviously pure fantasy about a “unique expression” of the Roman Rite which was mandated by Vatican II are essentially hypocrites.

The Novus Ordo is the unique expression?

Try this on for size. You even have to speak German to sense what is wrong with this.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
22 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 551, and a short story… “Quarantine”

Please remember me when shopping online at Amazon. Thanks in advance.  Enter here and then do your thing.  US HERE – UK HERE

I had a note from a reader who asked about old indulgence terminology and what a “quarantine” was.  Since doing penance for 40 days was in the early Church a common ecclesiastical penalty, it became a commonplace to think of the remittance of temporal punishment due to sin in terms of 40 days of penance.  Hence, the quarantine, from Latin, for 40.

Speaking of quarantines, which we have experienced lately…

A short story…

QUARANTINE
By Arthur C. Clarke

Earth’s flaming debris still filled half the sky when the question filtered up to Central from the Curiosity Generator.

“Why was it necessary? Even though they were organic, they had reached Third Order Intelligence.”

“We had no choice: five earlier units became hopelessly infected, when they made contact.”

“Infected? How?”

The microseconds dragged slowly by, while Central tracked down the few fading memories that had leaked past the Censor Gate, when the heavily-buffered Reconnaissance Circuits had been ordered to self-destruct.

“They encountered a – problem – that could not be fully analyzed within the lifetime of the Universe. Though it involved only six operators, they became totally obsessed by it.”

“How is that possible?”

“We do not know: we must never know. But if those six operators are ever re-discovered, all rational computing will end.”

“How can they be recognized?”

“That also we do not know; only the names leaked through before the Censor Gate closed. Of course, they mean nothing.”

“Nevertheless, I must have them.”

The Censor voltage started to rise; but it did not trigger the Gate.

“Here they are: King, Queen, Bishop, Knight, Rook, Pawn.”

[Isaac Asimov’s Science Fiction Magazine, First Issue, Vol 1, No. 1, Spring 1977.]

I marvel at how, through our technological advances, we discover more and more mystery in things once we can examine them anew.  For example, the Shroud is a photographic negative, the Tilma has a reflection in the eye, etc.

St. Thomas Aquinas suggests that there is an angel assigned to everything that moves.  He didn’t know about atoms.

It is estimated that there are between 1078 to 1082 atoms in the observable universe. That’s between ten quadrillion vigintillion and one-hundred thousand quadrillion vigintillion atoms.   That’s a lot of angels, each one his own species, as different from each other as giraffes from armadillos.

That doesn’t count subatomic particles.  Even more angel.

Did the telescope and our ability to see billions of stars give us a way for human imagination to glimpse the infinite?  We are not, in this life with our senses, proportioned to the infinite, nor will we be after death.  The infinite will be forever fascinating, alluring, inexhaustible.

BTW the Shannon Number represents all of the possible move variations in chess. It is estimated there are between 10111 and 10123 positions (including illegal moves). If you rule out illegal moves it drops to only 1040 moves.

The other day I saw a video in which two chess engines – of different generations – were pitted against each other.  Stockfish 15 (rated 3700) v. Stockfish 8 (3370).  The first game were given 1 millisecond per move in the 1st game.

“The microseconds dragged slowly by…”.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
3 Comments