ASK FATHER: Can I change my children’s godparents?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I’m from Indonesia. So glad to read your postings.. all of them
really strengthen my Catholic faith…

My question regarding: can parents (which is my wife and me) change our daughter (now almost 2 years old)’s Godmother? The response of this question actually can be found around internet, for example by Deacon Greg Kandra and by Father Christopher House, S.T.L., J.C.L., from Diocese of Springfield.
But I want to ask how if we replace with my other best friend which I know very well has a good faith life, also a catechist and also attended in the ceremony?

My daughter was baptized almost 2 years ago on 9 Nov 2019. We chose my wife’s best friend as a Godmother. But as the time goes, her life doesn’t show as a good standing Catholic. I especially, as father, worry if this will have any effect to my daughter’s spiritual life, since according to one answers in the internet, godparents “ were the historical witnesses to the baptism and entered into a permanent spiritual relationship with the baptized.”

Is this true Father? There is a permanent spiritual relation?

That’s my concern about my daughter’s faith.

Firstly, I’m glad this blog is of help.  It’s nice to know that I can reach from my desk to yours across the world.

Secondly, Rev. Mr. Kandra and Fr. House are reliable.  You don’t have strong occasion to doubt them.   Of course their answer was “No”, you cannot change your children’s godparents.

So, the short answer is: “No.”

Then, you ask, “But….”

The longer answer comes next: “Noooooooooo.”

The Code of Canon Law can. 872 says:

“In so far as possible, a person being baptized is to be assigned a sponsor. In the case of an adult baptism, the sponsor’s role is to assist the person in Christian initiation. In the case of an infant baptism, the role is together with the parents to present the child for baptism, and to help it live a Christian life befitting the baptized and faithfully to fulfill the duties inherent in baptism.”

“Assist the person in Christian initiation…”  When does that end?  In a sense, after a short period of catechism, etc.  In reality, it doesn’t end until we draw our last breath.

“Help it live a Christian life…”  So long as life goes on, this relationship and the obligation endures.

It is alarming how many parents ask friends to be godparents even though those friends don’t show any evidence of practicing their faith.  It’s a kind of reward or a token of affection.   They really should consider the spiritual good of the child, not the fleeing moment of bonomie.

The role of godparents or sponsors is manifold.

Initially, they are the official witnesses to the baptism.  Their names are entered into the parish register.   This record cannot be changed.  The baptism is a matter of record.

Also, there is the spiritual relationship.  During the rite of baptism, the godparents speak in the person of an infant who cannot speak for himself.  They answer the questions put to the infant during the rite.

Godparents enter into an important spiritual relationship with the newly baptized.  They are to help in the spiritual development of the new Christian, whether the newly baptized is a child or an adult.

If you choose wrongly, not having considered the longer term, or if the people you chose swerve into a life that doesn’t jive with their spiritual role, both you as parents and even the godchild or god children have an obligation to help those errant sponsors, godparents, straighten things out.

The relationship is not one way.

If it becomes clear to parents that the godparents they chose for children aren’t working out in the Christian role for which they are to fulfill, it is a good idea to find others to help pick up the slack.  However, the fact of being godparents cannot be changed.

So, a couple questions for the sake of those who are reading this.

Do you know the date of your baptism?   After all, that’s a pretty important day.  Coming into the light of this world as a little heathen dominated by the “Prince of this world” is one thing and being baptized into the mystical Person of Christ, becoming a member of the Church, risen from sin and made a child of God is another.

Do you know who your godparents are or were?   If they, one or both, are alive, what’s up with them?  Have you had a relationship with them?  Is it too late?   Are you concerned for their souls?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
9 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 140

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
1 Comment

Once upon a time there was a super-Catholic land called Quebec.

Once upon a time there was a super-Catholic land called Quebec.

[… insert here MODERNISM – SPIRIT OF VATICAN II – WET NOODLE BISHOPS …]

And, boys and girls, the moral of the story is corruptio optimi pessima.

From UCANEWS:

Canadian police seize altar wine, say it’s illegal to import it

Seizures in Quebec appear related to laws governing the resale of alcohol within provinces

Police have seized large quantities of altar wine in the Canadian province of Quebec, creating a situation where buying a bottle is nearly impossible[One wonders if that is not the point.]

On April 9, police officers seized sacramental wine from Bertrand, Foucher, Bélanger, Inc. in Montreal, Procure Ecclésiastique, Inc. in Quebec City and Chandelles Tradition MB, Inc. in Saint-Constant.

Sandra Dion, spokeswoman for the Quebec City Police Department, said the wine was seized following an investigation. The seizures appear related to laws governing the resale of alcohol within provinces, although some distributors claim they are within the law and have licenses.

The altar wine available in Quebec comes from two Californian producers: Mont La Salle Altar Wines and Cribari Premium Altar Wines. However, since the Société des alcools du Québec (SAQ) — the provincial liquor board — does not sell these products, the wines had to be imported from other Canadian provinces. Although that was the practice for many years, police now says it’s illegal.

“Officers from the Montreal Police Department showed up with a warrant,” said Alain Denis, general manager at Bertrand, Foucher, Bélanger, Inc., a store specializing in church goods. The warrant mentioned illegal possession and selling of alcohol. Chandelles Tradition MB did not return calls.

The Catholic Church says the wine used for Mass must be natural, made entirely from grapes, uncorrupted and free of foreign substances. A locally produced altar wine was available for a few years, but it is not produced anymore, so distributors in Quebec resort to American-produced wines. The specialized wine made in California is imported to Ontario or New Brunswick before resellers can get it in the province of Quebec.

“This issue has been dragging on for 40 years,” said Jacques Laroche, general manager and co-owner of Procure Ecclésiastique, which had its entire stock seized.

“The SAQ, since at least the 1980s, has been trying to prevent the distribution of altar wine in Quebec,” he added. “This forces parishes and religious communities to buy from other provinces.

Last December, the Liquor Control Board of Ontario warned permit holders that selling alcohol in other Canadian provinces is prohibited.

“I can confirm there has been no change to the terms of the sacramental wine appointment issued by the LCBO,” an LCBO spokesman said April 22.

So important was it to enforce this law that they confiscated altar wine from parishes.

There are various types of “wine” which are valid for Mass.  More HERE.

Meanwhile, in another formerly super-Catholic place, Ireland… from The Burkean:

Shocking Footage as Gardaí Storm Church for Violating Lockdown Regulations

Another week and another outrage has emerged in lockdown Ireland as a Latin Mass ceremony was gatecrashed by members of An Garda Síochána implementing NPHET edicts. In harrowing footage released this afternoon, congregants of the SSPX operated Corpus Christi Church in Athlone can be heard rebuking members of the force for breaking up the socially distanced Mass.

Following the arrival of Gardaí parishioners were forced to give their names and details for fear of arrest. This embarrassing act of policing comes in the wake of the incessant harassment of the faithful in Limerick at the behest of Councillor Elisa O’Donovan.

[…]

Corruptio optimi pessima.

Posted in Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
38 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 139

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
Comments Off on Daily Rome Shot 139

ASK FATHER: What does SSPX stand for?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

What does SSPX stand for?

That question can be taken in more than one way.

Firstly, what are the initials, the acronym?

As you know, most members of religious orders, societies and institutes, put the initials of their organization after their name, to identity who they are.  For example, O.F.M. Cap. comes after the name of one of the flavors of Franciscans, founded by St. Francis of Assisi, the Order of Friars Minor Capuchin. O.P would mean Ordo Praedicatorum, the Order of Preachers founded by St. Dominic, otherwise known as Dominicans. SJ after a name… well…

SSPX is an abbreviated acronym for FSSPX, which means Fraternitas Sacerdotalis Sancti Pii X (Decimi), the “Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X”. Hence, this is a fraternity or society of priests, not lay people. Lay people don’t belong to the SSPX.

That’s what SSPX stands for.

What does THE SSPX stand for?   You can read their own words about themselves at their site HERE, under “Mission” and “Key concerns”.  What it boils down to is a curt statement: ““The purpose of the Society is the priesthood and all that pertains to it and nothing but what concerns it.”

The Society stood for and stands for the formation of priests in line with the Church’s perennial teachings. Members of the SSPX are concerned that there are strong currents in the Church out of harmony with the Church’s Tradition. They are concerned to hand on the Church’s Tradition.

That’s what SSPX stands for and what the SSPX stands for.

The SSPX has an anomalous canonical status. I have written about that.   Some of Francis’ moves toward and about the SSPX has made their canonical situation both clearer and more complicated, but – ironically – in a positive way.

Here is more reading…

ASK FATHER: What’s the truth about the SSPX?

More about the SSPX and the heart

ASK FATHER: Does the SSPX “exercise legitimate ministries” or not?

A final point.  In 1988, when the founder of the SSPX, Archbp. Marcel Lefebvre, consecrated four bishops without the permission of Pope John Paul II, some of their priests formed their own group called the “Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter” or FSSP.  They have strong roots in the spirituality of the late Archbishop.  Therefore their mission is similar to that of the SSPX: “The mission of the Fraternity is two-fold: first, the formation and sanctification of priests in the cadre of the traditional liturgy, commonly called the Extraordinary Form of the Roman rite, and secondly, the care of souls and pastoral activities in the service of the Church.”

It could be said that the SSPX and the FSSP are in “competition”.  The fact is that the present landscape of the Church is extremely complicated and large.  Each group is clearly trying to preserve the Church’s Tradition and to form solid priests.  In that they are on the same page.  A major difference between the FSSP and the SSPX is that FSSP is formally recognized by the Church and the SSPX is not.  That doesn’t mean that the SSPX has no status whatsoever.  It means that their status is not as formalized and clear as that of the FSSP (and other traditional groups).

Our constant hope and prayer is that, soon, all these complexities will fall away as so much chaff in the wind and that we will all harmoniously cooperate together.

Please, Lord Jesus, High Priests… please, Mary, Queen of the Clergy… make it so.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, SSPX | Tagged
3 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 138

Photo by Bree Dail.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
4 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon notes – 3rd Sunday after Easter (N.O. 4th of Easter) 2021

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at the Mass for your Sunday (obligation or none), either live or on the internet? Let us know what it was.

Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all. Share the good stuff.

Also, are your churches opening up? What was attendance like?

If you are involved with preparing coffee and donuts after Mass (yes, this is returning) consider using Mystic Monk Coffee.  Use my link. You help the monks, you help yourselves, you help me.  A pretty good deal.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
4 Comments

ASK FATHER: Bishop reimposed Sunday Mass obligation but there are still attendance numbers restrictions.

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Dear Father,

Our bishop recently ended the dispensation from the obligation to attend Sunday Mass, except in cases of old age or health. This means my young, healthy family is obligated to attend Mass once more. He has also increased the capacity allowance to 50%, but social distancing (6 ft) is still required.

When churches reopened at limited capacity (it had been 33%), our priest was opposed to any sort of registration or reservation system. Instead, he split the parish into two groups by surname, who have been attending Mass on alternating weekends. He has said that he will continue that system due to space limitations (our church building is small).

Is my family obligated to see if another local parish can fit us in on those “off” weekends?

Interesting.  Reimpose the obligation, but with restricted access to Mass in parishes.  That signals a somewhat cynical view of the numbers of people the bishop expects to return to Mass.

Here’s a thought.  Write to the bishop and ask his advice:

“We’re supposed to go every week, but our pastor will only let us go every other week.  Since you imposed the obligation, which parish should we attend on ‘off’ weekends?”

Another thought: If its not too onerous, go to another parish, maybe permanently.

And speaking of a burden, there is an adage: Nemo ad impossibilia tenetur. No one is bound to the impossible.

If it is truly burdensome, no one is bound to obligation. Say the pastor won’t let you go to Mass. The next parish is in he next county fifty miles away, with a Mass at a bad time for your family needs. The obligation is lifted.

So, in a word, no, you are not strictly obliged.

I would still write to the Bishop.

You reimposed the obligation, but it’s hard to fulfill it here. What to do?

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged ,
12 Comments

Linguistic machinations of the Left

By sure to check out my good friend Fr. Gerry Murray’s piece today at The Catholic Thing.

Fr. Murray tackles the “attempt by liberal clerics and laity to compel the Catholic Church to get rid of what they deem unacceptable doctrines on sexual morality”.

Their tactic is to “change the language used by the Church in setting out those doctrines”.

Thus, Murray…

One strategy employed uses a self-contradictory form of attack: a teaching is dismissed as being unintelligible to modern people because of the use of obscure philosophical language. At the same time the teaching is condemned as cruel and hurtful because those same modern people, it turns out, are perfectly capable of understanding the language and meaning of the teaching. They just don’t like it.

They don’t like it because, often, they want to justify their own sinning.

Certain bishops and priests are the prime movers in a relentless campaign to have the Church abandon the doctrine that homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered. In line with both the Old and New Testaments and the long history of Catholic moral reasoning, the Church instructs us that such acts are intrinsically evil and can never be morally good, under any circumstance.

[…]

Furthermore, if the Church says my choice to engage in homosexual activity is wrong, it is the Church that is in fact wrong. Such a person, who wants to commit sin with a peaceful conscience, may already have had this line of reasoning endorsed by a “sympathetic and caring priest” – of whom there are a number these days, some even media celebrities – who is himself a “hero.” Our culture tends to cast such priests as bravely speaking truth to power and risking the wrath of superiors to give comfort to those hurt by unkind words from clueless, backward Catholic bullies who take the Bible literally.

Please go read the whole thing over there.

Force the Church to change language in, say, the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

NB: The same machinations are used by other libs/progressivists/etc. in other realms, not just sexual morality.   For example, this is being done regarding capital punishment.   Introduced into the discussion are vague terms such as “inadmissible”. For example, this is being done regarding the ordination of women.  Make claims about inequality with a smattering of unsubstantiated claims about ancient times, marinated in misleading statements about the sacrament of Holy Orders.  For example, this being is done in regard to Holy Communion for manifest adulterers.  Bring in a words like “accompaniment”.

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Jesuits, Sin That Cries To Heaven, The Drill | Tagged ,
8 Comments

Fr Z with a question: TV, wifi, etc.

Whenever I ask the readership a question, I am amazed at the number of well-informed people pipe in.

Question about TVs.  Actually about those big monitors, which is pretty much what they are now.

As I contemplate some relocation issues, I am wondering if there are good, fast “wireless” TV/monitors which don’t need a cable, coax or cat-5, from the wall or satellite box, etc.

I am thinking I won’t get “cable” at all, just internet.   After all, with cable there are “57 channels and nothing on”, as the song goes.  More like 357, and I don’t mean “magnum”.  You can subscribe to channels and get news on youtube, even live events.   And I don’t watch much news anyway, lately.  It’s all just too… dreadful.

The idea is to have the monitor on a large rolling stand.  There will be need for a power cord, of course.    Without having to have a specific cable connection, the whole thing could be easily relocated to another wall power plug.

I would probably attach a UPS on the bottom of the stand.  Any components (e.g., a region-free blu-ray player) I want to plug into the monitor would go on the stand’s shelves and would draw their power also off the UPS.

Fast router for fast wi-fi directly to the “TV”.

Any thoughts?  Have any of you been down this path?  Minimum speeds?  Hardware?   Get my own router?  Use the internet provider’s router?

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
26 Comments