Ash Wednesday – Fasting, Abstinence, and You (with notes on alligator, endothermic moonfish, &, of course, muskrat

According to the 1983 Code of Canon Law for the Latin Church, Latin Church Catholics are bound to observe fasting and abstinence on Ash Wednesday.

Here are some details. I am sure you know them already, but they are good to review.

FASTING: Catholics who are 18 year old and up, until their 59th birthday (when you begin your 60th year), are bound to fast (1 full meal and perhaps some food at a couple points during the day, call it 2 “snacks”, according to local custom or law – call it, two snacks that don’t add up to a full meal) on Ash Wednesday and on Good Friday.

There is no scientific formula for this.  Figure it out.

ABSTINENCE: Catholics who are 14 years old and older are abound to abstain from meat on Ash Wednesday and on all Fridays of Lent.

In general, when you have a medical condition of some kind, or you are pregnant, etc., these requirements can be relaxed.

For Eastern Catholics there are differences concerning dates and practices. Perhaps our Eastern friends can fill us Latins in.

You should by now have a plan for your spiritual life and your physical/material mortifications and penitential practices during Lent.

You would do well to include some works of mercy, both spiritual and corporal.

I also recommend making a good confession close to the beginning of Lent.  Let me put that another way:

GO TO CONFESSION!

“But Father! But Father!”, some of you are saying anxiously, “What about my Mystic Monk Coffee?  I can drink my Mystic Monk Coffee, can’t I?  Can’t I?”

You can, of course, coffee with and as part of your full meal and two “snacks”.  No question there.

How about in between meals on Ash Wednesday?

The old axiom, for the Lenten fast, is “Liquidum non frangit ieiuniumliquid does not break the fast”, provided – NB – you are drinking for the sake of thirst, rather than for eating.

Common sense suggests that chocolate banana shakes or “smoothies”, etc., are not permissible, even though they are pretty much liquid in form.  They are not what you would drink because you are thirsty, as you might more commonly do with water, coffee, tea, wine in some cases, lemonade, even some of these sports drinks such as “Gatorade”, etc.

Again, common sense applies, so figure it out.

Drinks such as coffee and tea do not break the Lenten fast even if they have a little milk added, or a bit of sugar, or fruit juice, which in the case of tea might be lemon.

Coffee would break the Eucharistic fast (one hour before Communion), since – pace fallentes  – coffee is no longer water, but it does not break the Lenten fast on Ash Wednesday.

You will be happy to know that chewing tobacco does not break the fast (unless you eat the quid, I guess), nor does using mouthwash (gargarisatio in one manual I checked) or brushing your teeth (pulverisatio).

Concerning the consumption of alligator and crocodile – HERE  I included notes also on the eating of endothermic moonfish, peptonized beef, and muskrat… just in case.

If you want to drink your coffee and tea with true merit I suggest drinking it from one of my coffee mugs.  I’d like to offer an indulgence for doing so, but that’s above my pay grade.

I just happen to have available a “Liquidum non frangit ieiunium” mug!  HERE

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, 1983 CIC can. 915, ASK FATHER Question Box, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged , ,
5 Comments

“Let’s stop demanding perfection from potential allies.”

Over at The Remnant – they are upping their tech game there – Michael Matt has a video “From The Editor’s Desk” in which he makes a critically important point for all of us to consider … and then embrace.

The front part of the video gets into the politics of the swamp, etc.

Since I am a victim of the New catholic Red Guard campaign of online cancel terror, the part I am really interested starts at about 19:10:

“And by the way… we gotta get ready for war here. Let’s stop demanding perfection from potential allies, now, who are really rushing toward our side of the battlefield. They’re just waking up. They said crazy things not that long ago…. Let’s anticipate these people, shall we?”

Keep watching.  He has some good examples.

Libs are able to put aside small differences to work together. They want to tear down and they want all the help they can get. Conservatives, however, tend to defend their little wrinkle of turf and fight against others soooo close to them, but with a slightly different view of the battlefield. In the words of my old pastor, “They couldn’t organize a bird cage.”

Not the Left. Oh no. Look at how well networked and organized they are.

Michael Matt’s message is dead on target.

Let’s not make the perfect into the enemy of the good. We have to work together.

The Left might be woke, but we have to welcome to our lines those who are waking up.

Posted in The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
11 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 79

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
5 Comments

Meanwhile… Ebola

From Newsmax:

Ebola Epidemic Declared in Guinea

The West African country Guinea declared an Ebola epidemic Sunday after an outbreak killed several people and hospitalized others.

The Ebola virus killed at least three people and infected four others after a spread possibly traced to the Feb. 1 burial of a nurse. All the known cases involved people aged over 25.

“The government reassures the population that all measures are being taken to stem this epidemic as quickly as possible,” Guinean Health Minister Remy Lamah said per the Washington Examiner.

“It invites the populations of the affected areas to respect hygiene and prevention measures and to report to health authorities in the presence of suggestive signs.”

Cases of Ebola, which causes diarrhea, internal hemorrhaging, and fever, had been isolated to two cities, N’Zerekore and Conakry.

[…]

The Democratic Republic of the Congo last week confirmed four Ebola cases not linked to the Guinea outbreak.

[…]

Posted in Semper Paratus, The Coming Storm | Tagged
2 Comments

Proper Mass for Shrove Tuesday “in honor of the Holy Face”

Tomorrow is Shrove Tuesday, the day before Ash Wednesday and the beginning of Lent for the Roman Church.

I was sent this by a kind soul: a Mass proper for Shrove Tuesday, a Votive Mass in Honor of the Holy Face of Jesus. … Missa Votiva in honorem “Sacri Vultus”, which is celebrated in Red.   The Introit is “Humiliavit semetipsum“.

Extraordinary Mass in Honour of the Holy Face of Jesus Latin-English

There is a similar Mass on Tuesday of Septuagesima (the Agony in the Garden) and Tuesday of Sexagesima (the Column of the Flagellation).

In fact, if memory serves there were Votive Masses for all the “arma Christi“, the instruments of the Passion, and I believe this was promoted by the, yes, Passionists.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 | Tagged ,
1 Comment

Seven minutes of terror

No, I don’t mean the homily at “liturgy” by Sister Randi over at the merged cluster of “Sing A New Faith Community Into Being Faith Community” in the Diocese of Libville.

Here is a video explaining the landing of  Perseverance the Mars Rover that’s coming up on 18 February.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

As an exercise, contrast that video with the must shorter video about the landing of Curiosity back in 2012.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

You have sense that a lot of things have changed since 2012… apart from the fact that in the newer version the reader struggles to pronounce the name of the Rover.

The live feed that will cover the landing…

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in Look! Up in the sky! | Tagged
6 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 78

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
2 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 77

Photo by Bree Dail.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
4 Comments

ASK FATHER: Blessing ashes at home

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Peace and good times, Father Z. [Right now, I’d settle for okay times.]
May the blessing and distribution of ashes be done at home in this time of pandemic? Our Archdiocese (in the Philippines) and the Episcopal Commission on Liturgy here is drafting an Ash Wednesday Ritual for the Use at Home for those who cannot participate physically (due to the pandemic).  A striking note is that the first prayer in the current Missal is recommended for a layperson (they say, the elder/the father in the household) to pronounce the blessing.

I know, Father, that the most important thing in Lent is we truly be sorry for our sins and a change of heart for God. Yet I’m concerned with how these blessings reserved to priests and deacons be commended to laypersons.

By “current Missal” I think you mean the Novus Ordo Missale Romanum.  In fact, the 1962 Misssale is also a “current Missal”.  Don’t fall into that trap.

It would be far better were the ashes to be blessed before they are distributed to the lay faithful.  In fact… isn’t that what the rites of the Church foresee?  Bless them before distribution?  That’s how it would be done in church, right?

Instead we have another symptom of the erosion of the concept of “blessing”, which is found even in official liturgical books now: the reduction of constitutive blessings to invocative blessings.  Some blessings call God’s grace down upon someone and others constitute the thing, place or person as blessed, in an enduring way, set apart for God.

As a direct response, whatever you do, don’t try to bless the ashes in the manner of a priest, with the sign of the cross over them.  I like the idea that the father of a family will bless his family, but I don’t like this confusion of roles.  Particularly when the ashes could be blessed by the priest or bishop before distribution.

I fear that this sort of thing reduces an important rite – we are our rites – to a kind of sentimentality.

The first prayer in the Novus Ordo Missale runs like this:

Deum Patrem, fratres carissimi, suppliciter deprecemur, ut hos cineres, quos paenitentiae causa capitibus nostris imponimus, ubertate gratiae suae benedicere dignetur. … Dearest brethren, let us humbly pray that God the Father will the abundance of His grace deign to bless these ashes, which for the sake of penance we put on our heads.   [NB: and explicit reference to blessing the ashes]

There is a moment of silence and the priest continues, hands extended:

Deus, qui humiliatione flecteris et satisfactione placaris, aurem tuae pietatis precibus nostris inclina, et super famulos tuos, horum cinerum aspersione contactos, gratiam tuae benedictionis + effunde propitius, ut, quadragesimalem observantiam prosequentes, ad Filii tui paschale mysterium celebrandum purificatis mentibus pervenire mereantur. … O God, who are swayed by an act of humility and are placated by reparation, incline your merciful ear to our prayers, and kindly pour out the grace of your + blessing on your servants, marked by the aspersion of these ashes, so that, pursuing the Lenten observance, they may with purified minds attain to the celebration of the Paschal Mystery of your Son.

[NB: This does not bless the ashes.  It is an invocative blessing on those who will have received them.]

There follows an optional alternate prayer, which explicitly does bless the ashes.

In the Novus Ordo Missale, there are two prayers, one invocative and an alternate which is constitutive.  This is a symptom of the incoherence in some of our liturgical books that follows when some in high places want to eliminate the distinction of constitutive and invocative.  We find this in the so-called “Book of Blessings”, in which the prayers bless nothing, but call down blessings on some who, for example, might look at the statue in question.  It is an attack on sacramentals, in essence.

When we use the current traditional edition of the Missale Romanum, there are four prayers, all of which must be said.

Contrast with the Novus Ordo invocative version.

[Not my translations:]

O almighty and eternal God, spare those who are penitent, be merciful to those who supplicate Thee; and vouchsafe to send Thy holy Angel from heaven, to bless + and sanctify + these ashes, that they may be a wholesome remedy to all who humbly implore Thy holy name, and accuse themselves as a result of the consciousness of their sins, deploring their crimes before Thy divine clemency, or humbly and earnestly beseeching Thy sovereign mercy : and grant through the invocation of Thy most holy name that all who may be sprinkled with them for the remission of their sins may receive health of body and safety of soul. Through Christ our Lord. Amen.

O God, who desirest not the death of sinners, but rather their repentance, look down most graciously upon the frailty of human nature, and in Thy goodness vouchsafe to bless + these ashes which we intend to put upon our heads in token of humility and that we may obtain pardon; that we who know that we are dust, and for the penalty of our guilt must return unto dust, may deserve to obtain of Thy mercy the pardon of all sins, and the rewards promised to penitents. Through Christ our Lord. Amen.

O God, who are moved by humiliation, and appeased by satisfaction : incline the ear of Thy goodness to our prayers, and favourably pour forth upon the heads of Thy servants sprinkled with these ashes the grace of Thy blessing, that Thou mayest both fill them with the spirit of compunction, and effectually grant what they have justly prayed for : and ordain that what Thou hast granted may be permanently established and remain inviolate. Through Christ our Lord. Amen.

Almighty and eternal God, who didst grant the remedy of Thy pardon to the Ninivites doing penance in ashes and sackcloth, mercifully grant that we may so imitate them in our attitude that like them we may obtain forgiveness. Through our Lord. Amen.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Pò sì jiù, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
5 Comments

ASK FATHER: If someone desecrates Hosts, does the Real Presence remain?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

If someone breaks the tabernacle takes the consecrated Hosts
desecrates (throws away to the gutters or dirty place) does the real presence exists?

There are some distinctions to be made here.

Firstly, the person who does such a thing would be committing a crime (breaking the tabernacle and theft) and also, objectively, a terrible sin (because the Eucharist isn’t just a thing, it is the Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity of Christ).   If such a person knew that and, being of sound mind, willingly did it anyway, she would be guilty of a truly horrible sin.

Also, such an action, throwing away the Blessed Sacrament, would under the usual conditions (commission of the mortal sin) incur automatically an excommunication which could only be lifted by the Holy See.

In the Latin Code of Canon Law we find:

can. 1367: Qui species consecratas abicit aut in sacrilegum finem abducit vel retinet in excommunicationem latae sententiae Sedi Apostolicae reservatam incurrit; clericus praeterea alia poena, non exclusa dimissione e statu clericali, puniri potest … A person who throws away the consecrated species or takes or retains them for a sacrilegious purpose incurs a latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See; moreover, a cleric can be punished with another penalty, not excluding dismissal from the clerical state..

The word abicit, abicere, means here “throw away”, and this was clarified by the Pontifical Council for the Interpretation of Legislative Texts, at their plenary session on 4 June 1999, as not … NOT… being restricted to “throw away” in a spirit of contempt, or intent to do dishonor.  It really does mean “throw away”, which is what happens when you put a consecrated Host or the Precious Blood down a sacrarium without first making sure that the substance of the same is first broken down (by dissolving).  Precious Blood, of course, should be consumed.

That said, in the case of any objectively sinful act which incurs an excommunication (e.g., throwing away the Eucharist), there are always the circumstances to be considered (e.g., the person’s will and knowledge, external compulsion, fear, etc.).

Redemptionis Sacramentum distinguished different levels of liturgical abuses.  The worst are in the category graviora delicata (graver crimes).  Among the graviora delicta is throwing away the Eucharist (cf. RS 172).   This grave crime is reserved to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

Whether the Real Presence continues or not depends on the condition of the Hosts.

So long as the outward appearance, the accidents, of bread remain recognizable, the Eucharist remain, the Real Presence of Christ remains.  As soon as the hosts break down and are no long recognizable in their accidents as bread, then what is there is not the Eucharist, Christ’s presence is no longer there.    If the place is very wet, that will happen faster.  If a little damp, slower.  Much depends on the place where they are thrown.

There are, however, also cases of Eucharistic miracles, namely, when Hosts have been preserved from dissolution in very harsh conditions or for a very long period.   For example, in 1730 in Siena, Italy, thieves stole a tabernacle that contained hosts.  Some days later, the hosts were fond in an alms box in a church.   The hosts were cleaned and venerated out of reparation for the terrible sacrilege that had been committed.  The hosts were then preserved.  Over the years, they remained perfectly normal, without any indication of dissolution or decay, which will happen to host over time with changes of humidity, etc.  Fifty years later, the bishop had the remaining hosts reserved.   At one point, some unconsecrated hosts were preserved in a similar way, but they were soon reduced to dust or eaten by worms.     Over the years the miraculous hosts have been examined.   They miraculously remain to this day, contrary to all laws of nature.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Canon Law | Tagged , , ,
1 Comment