Daily Rome Shot 43

Photo by Bree Dail.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
2 Comments

“If you don’t bother to pause and learn a single thing from your citizens storming your Capitol building, then you’re a fool…”.

I’ve been pretty unhappy with FNC for some time now.  However, tonight I tuned in to hear what Tucker Carlson had to say.

He made some really good points.

I sincerely hope that people will listen to this or read the transcript before reacting.

I’ll have the moderation queue on to keep the knuckle-head stuff down.

Here is the transcript (my emphases and comments):

Amid the bombardment of images of what took place at the U.S. Capitol Wednesday, too little time has been spent thinking about why it happened. Anyone who is trying to understand the significance of what’s going on right now ought to watch video of the last moments of Ashli Babbit, the woman who was shot and killed in the chaos.

Footage, which can easily be found online, shows Babbit standing in a hallway right off the House floor with an American flag tied around her neck. The scene around her is chaotic. People are bumping into each other, yelling, trying to get through the door into the chamber. Suddenly, with no warning, there is gunfire. You hear a shot and Babbit falls. People in the hallway scream. The camera closes in on her face. Babbit looks stunned. She’s staring straight ahead. You can see that she knows she’s about to die, which she did.

So what can we learn from this? It’s not enough to call it a tragedy. Imagine for a second learning that was your daughter. The last time you spoke to her, she was heading to Washington for a political rally. Now, she’s dead. You’ll never talk to her again. That’s what we’re watching, and we may be watching a lot more of it in the coming days.

Political violence begets political violence. That is an iron law. We have to be against that, no matter who commits the violence or under what pretext, no matter how many self-interested demagogues assure us the violence is justified or necessary. We have a duty to oppose all of this, not simply because political violence kills other people’s children, but because in the end it doesn’t work.

No good person will live a happier life because that woman was killed in the hallway of the Capitol today. [NB] So our only option, as a practical matter, is to fix what is causing this in the first place.

[Pay attention…] You may have nothing in common with the people on the other side of the country (increasingly, you probably don’t), but you’re stuck with them. The idea that groups of Americans will somehow break off into separate peaceful nations of like-minded citizens, is a fantasy. The two hemispheres of this country are inseparably intertwined, like conjoined twins. Neither can leave without killing the other. As horrifying as this moment is, we have no option but to make it better, to gut it out. [A good point.]

The second thing to consider, and it’s related to the first, is why Ashli Babbit went to the rally in the first place. She bore no resemblance to the angry children we have seen wrecking our cities in recent months — pasty, entitled nihilists dressed in black, setting fires and spray painting slogans on statues. She looked pretty much like everyone else.

So why was she there? We ought to think about that. If you want to fix it, you have to think about that.

The only reason this country is rich and successful is because for hundreds of years, we have enjoyed a stable political system. The only reason that system is stable is because it’s a democracy, responsive to voters. [There it is.]

Democracy is a pressure relief valve. [NB] As long as people sincerely believe they can change things by voting, they stay calm. They don’t burst into the House chamber. They talk and they organize and they vote. But the opposite is also true if people begin to believe that their democracy is fraudulent, that voting is a charade, that the system is rigged and it’s run in secret by a small group of powerful, dishonest people who are acting in their own interests. Then, God knows what could happen.

Actually, we do know what could happen, because it’s happening right now. It’s happened in countless other countries over countless centuries. And the cycle is always the same because human nature never changes.

“Listen to us!” scream the population.

“Shut up and do what you’re told,” say their leaders.

In the face of dissent, the first instinct of illegitimate leadership is to crack down on the population, but crackdowns never make it better. They always make the country more volatile and more dangerous. The people in charge rarely understand that. They don’t want to, they don’t care to learn or listen because all of this conversation is a referendum on them and their leadership. So they clamp down harder.

This is the Romanov program, and it ends badly every single time. But that doesn’t mean they won’t try it again. Of course they will, because it’s their nature. It’s how we got here in the first place.

Millions of Americans sincerely believe the last election was fake. You can dismiss them as crazy. You can call them conspiracy theorists. You can kick them off Twitter. But that won’t change their minds. Rather than trying to change their minds, to convince them and reassure them that the system is real, that democracy works — which you would do if you cared about the country or the people who live here — our new leaders will try to silence them.

What happened Wednesday will be used by the people taking power to justify stripping you of the rights you were born with as an American: [Rights all people have because they are images of God.] Your right to speak without being censored, your right to assemble, to not be spied upon, to make a living, and to defend your family.

These are the most basic and ancient freedoms that we have there. They’re why we live here in the first place. They’re why we’re proud to be Americans. They’re what make us different, and they’re all now in peril.

When thousands of your countrymen storm the Capitol building, you don’t have to like it. We don’t. You can be horrified by the violence, and we are.

[NB] But if you don’t bother to pause and learn a single thing from your citizens storming your Capitol building, then you’re a fool, you lack wisdom and self-awareness, and you have no place running a country. We got to this sad, chaotic day for a reason.

This article is adapted from Tucker Carlson’s opening commentary on the Jan. 6, 2021 edition of “Tucker Carlson Tonight.”

You will also want to catch Mark Steyn’s comments at 35:25.   Victor Davis Hanson at 42:22.

I think that Tucker’s points are important.

  • Human nature doesn’t change.
  • Political violence spawns more violence.
  • Leaders often are deaf and blind to problems in front of them.
  • We are stuck with each other.
  • If we don’t take steps to work things out, this is going to go badly.

What happened today was likened by one commentator on Twitter, which I posted under another item, to the Reichstag Fire of 1933.

His reference made a chill run down my spine.  It was government transition time in weary, economically battered Germany.  A couple weeks before Hitler had become Chancellor.   Some one set fire to the parliament building.  Hitler used the incident as a pretext for the suspension of civil liberties and a massive purge of the Nazi rival Communists.  That purge resulted in the Nazi Party taking complete control.   Moreover, some historians think that the Reichstag Fire was a “false flag” operation, actually perpetrated by the Nazis to given them an excuse to attack their rivals the Communists.

Now there are some reports that the pro-Trump crowd which went to the Capitol was infiltrated by Antifa thugs.  They possibly were the ones to flared the violence.  Think about it.  If you are an Antifia-type, isn’t at what you would do?

Also, given that everyone knew there would be a rally today, how is it that the DC and Capitol police weren’t somewhat better deployed?

The violence of today – false flag or not – is sure to be the pretext that the powerful Left will use to crack down on our freedoms.

Pray for commonsense to prevail.   One of the observations I have made over the last few weeks is that if people do not have confidence in election integrity, then just about the only recourse people will think they have is wide-spread insurrection, which is something to horrifying to contemplate.

Even as we should give some thought about preparing for the next months, let’s keep calm, particularly in arguments about this dire situation.

Posted in Cri de Coeur, Pò sì jiù, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , ,
31 Comments

Watching the chaos in Washington DC. Wherein Fr. Z rants.

I’m watching various live feeds from Washington DC on this day when Congress is to/was to certify the Electoral College vote.

Alarming still photos are now being broadcast of protesters on the floor of the Senate and security with guns drawn and aimed.

I’ve had a growing sense of unrest for weeks about this day. I cannot help but think that what is going on now is fueled in part by a rise in demonic activity.  That’s why I’ve often recited Ch. 3 of Title XI in the Rituale Romanum also for protection from demonic action surrounding the certification of the vote.  I didn’t know what was on the horizon exactly, but I suspected something bad was coming.

One way or another, one outcome or another with the election, I sense that – as of today – things are not going to be the same.  Today feels like a tipping point.

This didn’t develop out of nothing. It is a point along the trajectory we’ve been on for quite a while, at least since the 1960’s. I believe it has been slowly, carefully orchestrated in over the decades and it isn’t over. The education system and entertainment industry has been involved. By now, through the dumbing down and ideological twisting of education, to produce a couple generations of people who can’t reason, through the desensitizing of the masses to sin of all kinds on television, we’ve reached a kind of reaction point.

We are not at the end of what is in store for us, I’m afraid.

Now there also exists “Big Tech”.

Education… entertainment… news outlets… big tech… all aligned with an agenda which can be realized through a one party system.  A party that embraces abortion and other horrors.

The other day at Crisis I saw a paragraph in an article about the lunacy of a prayer in Congress that ended “Amen, and awoman.” This sums it up well:

Because we have substituted truth for power we have arrived at a place where we cannot even use the word amen or refer to others as husband, wife, mother, and father. We are on the verge of slipping into a nothingness, surrounded on all sides by the irrational and contradictory claims of a culture that is only concerned with having the “liberty” to craft their own version of reality, rather than living in the truth of the reality in which they find themselves.

Craft your own version of reality.  That was the temptation for our First Parents by the Enemy.

The divisions in our country and in the Church herself are so sharp, so broad, that it is hard to imagine what sort of event might heal the divides.  I can only imagine that it would be either the manifestation of an amazing miracle (e.g., I ask God daily for the miraculous elimination of the virus) or a disaster of some kind so great that it overcomes the ongoing atomization.

I am genuinely concerned that a chain reaction towards a dark outcome is underway.  The chain reaction was accelerated by the catalyst of COVID-1984, the Wuhan Devil. Yes, Devil.  I think the virus was cursed somewhere along the way.

Therefore, those of us who can, have to do our part in fighting the virus and its effects with spiritual weapons.   Fathers, you need to do this.  When you do, stand firm.  You will be attacked.

My hope is that many of you who may be a little tepid or complacent about your Catholic Faith will now be moved to get more serious, to make some life changes.

  • We all need to start gaming out in our heads what the next few months could bring.  Families need to have discussions.
  • Start praying in your homes, in your “domestic churches”.  Say the Rosary together.
  • Men, start asking for St. Joseph to be your special patron.
  • More than ever we need traditional liturgical worship and traditional devotions.
  • Everyone, along with prayer, take on some fasting and perhaps other mortifications.

The election and the counting of the Electoral College votes is just the backdrop, in a way.  The picture is far bigger.

Again, one way or another, one outcome or another with the election, I sense that – as of today – things are not going to be the same.  Today feels like a tipping point.

Today is also real Epiphany, when we commemorate the culmination of a long, arduous journey made for the sake of worshiping the Word made flesh.

Today we see what happens when people do not make that journey.

UPDATE:

I saw this dire tweet.   I can’t at this point say that I think he is wrong.

Also, at the Washington Times

Facial recognition firm claims antifa infiltrated Trump protesters who stormed Capitol

Trump supporters say that antifa members disguised as one of them infiltrated the protesters who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday.

A retired military officer told The Washington Times that the firm XRVision used its software to do facial recognition of protesters and matched two Philadelphia antifa members to two men inside the Senate.

The source provided the photo match to The Times.

One has a tattoo that indicates he is a Stalinist sympathizer. antifa promotes anarchy through violence and wants the end of America in favor of a Stalinist-state. “No more USA at all” is a protest chant.

XRVision also has identified another man who, while not known to have antifa links, is someone who shows up at climate and Black Lives Matter protests in the West.

Born in Portland, Ore., antifa has mounted a year of violence in that city. The mayor said this week that antifa is trying to destroy the town and called for tougher police measures.

Antifa, which is loosely organized nationwide, exports warriors to other towns.

Before the Nov. 4 election, an antifa chapter sent out on social media a reminder for members to disguise themselves as Trump supporters by wearing the distinctive red Make America Great Again (MAGA) hat.

“On Nov. 4 don’t forget to disguise yourselves as patriots/Trump supporters. Wear MAGA hats. USA flags. A convincing police uniform is even better. This way police and patriots responding to US won’t know who their enemies are and onlookers and the media will think there are Trump supporters rioting so it’s harder to turn popular opinion against us.

Posted in Save The Liturgy - Save The World, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, Urgent Prayer Requests, Wherein Fr. Z Rants |
34 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 42

Photo by Bree Dail.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
2 Comments

Lighter Fare for Epiphany

You had one job….

Posted in Lighter fare |
2 Comments

JUST TOO COOL: An intriguing Biblical archeology find

A polymath friend of mine presently deployed overseas send the most interesting links.  Today he clued me in on this from Live Science:

Dance floor where John the Baptist was condemned to death discovered, archaeologist says

Archaeologists claim that they have identified the deadly dance floor where John the Baptist — a preacher who foretold the coming of Jesus — was sentenced to death around A.D. 29.

The Bible and the ancient writer Flavius Josephus (A.D. 37-100) both describe how King Herod Antipas, a son of King Herod, had John the Baptist executed. Josephus specified that the execution took place at Machaerus, a fort near the Dead Sea in modern-day Jordan.

Herod Antipas feared the growing influence of John the Baptist among the population and so he executed him Josephus wrote. The Bible, on the other hand, tells a far more elaborate tale, claiming that Herod Antipas had John the Baptist executed in exchange for a dance.

[…]

A courtyard uncovered at Machaerus is likely the place where Salome’s dance was performed and where Herod Antipas decided to have John the Baptist beheaded, wrote Győző Vörös, director of a project called Machaerus Excavations and Surveys at the Dead Sea, in the book “Holy Land Archaeology on Either Side: Archaeological Essays in Honour of Eugenio Alliata” (Fondazione Terra Santa, 2020). The courtyard, Vörös said, has an apsidal-shaped niche that is probably the remains of the throne where Herod Antipas sat.

After King Herod’s death his kingdom was divided among his sons and Herod Antipas controlled a kingdom that included Galilee and part of Jordan. He controlled his kingdom at times from Machaerus. .

Archaeologists discovered the courtyard in 1980, but they didn’t recognize the niche as being part of Herod Antipas’ throne until now, Vörös wrote in the article. The presence of the throne next to the courtyard solidifies the conclusions about the dance floor, Vörös wrote.

The archaeological team has been reconstructing the courtyard and published several images in the book showing what it looked like around the time of John the Baptist’s execution.

[…]

More fascinating information and photos HERE

Posted in Just Too Cool | Tagged , ,
1 Comment

Daily Rome Shot 41

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
3 Comments

ASK FATHER: Is the Sacrament of Confirmation valid if the minister uses an instrument, such as a stylus or a swab?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

My son’s Confirmation is this Sunday and I just found out that the Bishop will be using a Q-tip because of Covid-19. Is this still valid? Thank you for all that you do. I find your blog very helpful.

I have dealt with this question before and, in fact, this question is a little dated.  I’m working through a massive back jam of email.

However… though I have dealt with it before, it merits more attention.

Is the Sacrament of Confirmation valid if the minister uses an instrument, such as a stylus or a swab?

In the past, the answer was resoundingly NO, it would be invalid.

BUT WAIT!  Here comes the Congregation for Divine Worship in a response to the USCCB saying that it is valid.  HERE

“The use by the minister of an instrument (gloves, cotton swab…), does not affect the validity of the Sacrament.”

Okayyyyyy…. hmmmmm…..

The problem with this is, of course, it really requires more than, “Because we say so!”, to resolve this.

I haven’t seen the entire response from the CDW.

Before saying anything else, we all know that the CHURCH – actually, the Vicar of Christ – gets to decide how sacraments are celebrated.  She can make changes to gestures and words that do not violate the divine origin of the sacraments or their essence, their essentials.   For example, a Pope can change the words, the form, for the Sacrament of confirmation.  Paul VI did that.

That change did not invalidate the previous, traditional form, a fact upheld by the CDF.

Back to the issue: Can an instrument be used in anointing a confirmand with chrism?

Some time ago when I posted on this, I also posted details from the amazing painting about the seven sacraments by the 15th c. Rogier van der Weyden.  In that painting, you clearly see the bishop using an instrument to anoint hands at an ordination and also to anoint the sick.  No problem there.  Anointing of hands is not of the essence of the sacrament of Orders and laying on of hands is not of the essence of anointing of the sick.  However, you also see the bishop anointing with an instrument for Confirmation.

BUT…. from the time of the Council of Trent, use of an instrument was forbidden.

In the traditional form, the bishop laid his hand on the head of the confirmand and then anointed the forehead with Chrism using the thumb of his right hand.  In an emergency, another finger could be used, but an instrument could not.   Paul VI lifted the obligatory laying on of the hand saying that the touching with the thumb in anointing accomplished that gesture as well.

Manuals reflected this.

Sabetti-Barrett’s 1919 edition of Compendium Theologiae Moralis,  says (in Latin):

669.  Query. – Question 2.  How is the [Confirmation] anointing to be done?

Response. It must be done with the right thumb of the Bishop in the manner of a cross on the forehead of the one confirmed.  However, the anointing would be valid if it were done by a different digit of the Bishop, and even if it were a digit of the left hand, because it would be an imposition of the bishop’s hand.  But a Bishop would sin, were he to do that without necessity, because he would be departing from the universal praxis of the Church; albeit it does not seem that an inversion of the aforementioned ceremony would reach the level of grave guilt. – Cf. S. Alphons. n. 165

Question 3.  Whether anointing can be done validly by means of an instrument?

Response. NEGATIVE., and the reason is, that the immediate imposition of the hand of the Minister would be lacking, which is absolutely required from what has been said.  On this in the new Code (1917):
§2. Anointing is not to be done with any instrument, but it is imposed properly by the hand of the minister on the head of the confirmand.

Prümmer in the 1953 Manuale Theologiae Moralis says:

156. 3. The anointing must be done with the thumb of the right hand, and not with a stylus or another instrument, as has already been said.  If, however, the bishop has a bad thumb, he can licitly anoint with the thumb of his left hand or with another digit.

We grant that THE CHURCH gets to determine how the sacraments are to be administered.

If there is going to be a change, the Congregation really doesn’t get to do that.

Keeping in mind that the touching of the head of the confirmand by the bishop with his thumb is, in effect, also the imposition of his hand, removing the touching with the hand is a serious problem.

Regarding imposition of the hand Ludwig Ott, in his section on Confirmation, reminds us that

There is no official dogmatic decision regarding the essential matter of the Sacrament of Confirmation.  Theologians are divided in their opinions.

a) Some, invoking the testimony of Holy Scripture (Acts 8,7; 19,6; Heb. 6,2) hold that the imposition of the hands alone is the essential matter (….) Cf. D. 424.
b) Other, appealing to the Decretum pro Armenis (D 697), the teaching of the Council of Trent (D 872), the Roman Catechism (II, 3,7), the traditional of the Greek Church and the teaching of St. Thomas…. declare that the anointing with chrism alone is the essential matter (St Bellarmine, …).

Ott explains that the latter view is erroneous and says:

The majority of modern Theologians, concurring with Church practice, see the essential matter in the imposition of the hands together with the anointing with chrism on the forehead.  That the imposition of hands belongs to the sacramental sign is evident from the clear testimony of Holy Writ and Tradition….

However, the 2020 CDW response seems to ignore the opinions of theologians which the Church has, hitherto, rested on for a contrary opinion.  I don’t think Tradition can simply be left aside.

It seems to me that what the CDW said is really hard to sustain.

Also, I believe that this really a question for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (validity of matter and form of the sacrament).  The CDF answered the question about the validity of the traditional rite after Paul VI’s changes.  That’s the venue.

Moreover, because this has to do with the validity of the sacrament, it seems to me that, just as Pius XII did in 1947 with his Apostolic Constitution Sacramentum ordinis about the rite of Ordination and the traditio instrumentorum, just as Paul VI did in his Apostolic Constitution Divinae consortium naturae in 1971 for Confirmation, a papal document, an Apostolic Constitution should deal with this.

So… what to do.

These days, because of the Wuhan Devil, confirmations have been postponed or cancelled.

However, if you want to be absolutely sure about the matter of anointing, which is in effect the laying on of the hand which is of the essence of the sacrament, then choose the TRADITIONAL rite when possible, or at least find out ahead of time if an instrument is going to be used.

Salvo meliore iudicio, of course.   If someone out there knows something clear or really helpful for this, I’d like to see it.  Write to me HERE

Just as an end note…

I find it deeply disturbing that in a time when…

  • demonic activity is on the rise and
  • when access to the sacraments is being sharply limited,
  • when big tech is exercising terrifying new control over information in conjunction with the news media and a political party which embraces the ghoulish evil of abortion and hellish gender twisting,
  • when the world seems to going absolutely insane around us,
  • when the Left is exerting massive force to silence any opposition with violence, both physical and psychological…

… there should come a statement from the Holy See which seems to contradict Tradition with regard to the sacrament of Confirmation, the sacrament that makes us sturdy and firm in the face of challenges.

PRAYER TO ACTIVATE YOUR CONFIRMATION

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices | Tagged , , ,
7 Comments

“Let y’all know!” The “Noveritis” Epiphany chant announcement of 2021’s movable dates and feasts

At Epiphany we Latins have – traditionally – chanted a solemn proclamation of the key liturgical dates or movable feasts for the new year of salvation, just begun.

This underscores how these dates and seasons are all interconnected.

The liturgical year is a reflection of and on the mystery of our salvation.  And, never forget, the mysteries shape us. We are our rites.

Some liturgical dates are movable. For example Septuagesima, in 2020, fell on 9 February. This beginning of Pre-Lent doesn’t fall on the same date every year because the date of Easter changes each year.  In 2021 Septuagesima will fall on 31 January.

“But Father! But Father!”, you libtards are surely sputtering.  “What does this chant sound like? Do it in English like the spirit of Vatican II wanted!   But you won’t because YOU HATE VATICAN II!”

Vatican II commanded that Latin be retained.

We will use Latin on real Epiphany, of course.

Here is what it sounds like, in case some deacon or priest out there, less familiar with chant, wants to give it a shot.  It sounds rather like the Exultet, sung at the Easter Vigil.  The Noveritis is a little awkward in parts.

You can find a printable PDF of the Noveritis 2021 HERENB: It has Ascension Thursday on the correct day!

Fathers.  Here is how to sing the Noveritis for 2021, on Epiphany.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Save The Liturgy - Save The World | Tagged , , ,
Comments Off on “Let y’all know!” The “Noveritis” Epiphany chant announcement of 2021’s movable dates and feasts

ASK FATHER: Why don’t trads want Permanent Deacons to be in traditional liturgy?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

From my brief experience, it seems that most traditionalist parishes are not interested in the permanent diaconate. This seems odd to me, since permanent deacons would be readily available for Solemn Masses, and many parishes are not able to have solemn masses as frequently as they might like. Promoting the permanent diaconate would alleviate that problem. Why does there seem to be such apathy to well trained permanent deacons in traditionalist circles?

“Not interested… apathy…”.

I’ve heard downright hostility sometimes.

This both baffles me and it doesn’t puzzle me at all.

First, there is a problem with understanding that permanent deacons are not less deacons than transitional deacons.  A man who is ordained to the diaconate is a deacon.   Period.  A deacon is a deacon is a deacon.    Hence, they can take the role of DEACON in a Solemn Mass, as well as the role of Subdeacon.

Second, there is the problem of the formation and performance of permanent deacons.  I have zero doubt… ZERO… that the men who offer themselves to be permanent deacons are good men, well-intentioned.  Alas, over the last decades, many of them have not been given adequate formation.  Some were given terrible formation, including a lot of confusion about the role of their wives, if they are married.

On the other hand, I have also known a few permanent deacons whom I would have made BISHOPS!

Third, with a few exceptions in my experience, permanent deacons seem to know very little about liturgy, and what they do know depends on the quality of formation they received… often deficient.  There’s plenty of bad to go around in this matter since the priests with whom they are assigned generally know just about as much.

I am all for permanent deacons being involved in Traditional Liturgy.  THEY ARE DEACONS.  But there is a huge challenge on both sides of the altar rail.

For some people, their hesitancy or hostility toward permanent deacons seems to come from the fact that most permanent deacons are married.  In the matter of continence for permanent deacons, I refer the readership to the thoughts of canonist Ed Peters, who has written about the matter.

Ideally, all men pursuing permanent diaconate should be well-schooled in the Church’s sacred worship.  There should be as high an expectation for them to know their Roman Rite as there is for priests and bishops.   Of course, there’s the rub, isn’t it?

If the Roman Rite is, at least juridically, in two forms, any cleric in the Roman Church who doesn’t know both forms is quite simply ignorant of his own Church’s sacred worship.  That’s dreadful.

 

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Our Catholic Identity, Save The Liturgy - Save The World |
15 Comments