Sister of Charity of New York v. Charlie Kirk

From the site of the Sisters of Charity of New York.  HERE

Sisters of Charity of New York Respond to Cardinal Dolan’s Remarks on Charlie Kirk

Several of us [because that’s all that’s left of you] watched Cardinal Dolan’s recent FOX interview, where he referred to Charlie Kirk as “a modern-day St. Paul.” The Cardinal praised Mr. Kirk’s conviction and willingness to speak about the Lord and for being a model for young people looking for meaning in their lives.

We grieve every loss of life and unequivocally condemn the killing of Mr. Kirk.

What Cardinal Dolan may not have known is that many of Mr. Kirk’s words were marked by [here it comes] racist, homophobic, transphobic, and anti-immigrant [! one wonders how many they have living with them in their ever more empty houses.] rhetoric, by violent pro-gun advocacy, and by the promotion of Christian nationalism. These prejudicial words do not reflect the qualities of a saint. [Which they would know WHAT about?] To compare Mr. Kirk to St. Paul risks confusing the true witness of the Gospel and giving undue sanction to words and actions that hurt the very people Jesus calls us to love.

Just last week, Cardinal Dolan joined us in celebrating the 50th anniversary of the canonization of our Foundress, St. Elizabeth Ann Seton. Elizabeth’s legacy is not one of exclusion or hatred, but of radical welcome, tireless service, and unwavering love of neighbor. Many of Mr. Kirk’s words stand in stark contrast to the charity and compassion that defined those of Elizabeth Seton.

For generations, the Sisters of Charity of New York have cared for immigrant families arriving with nothing but hope. While our direct service has changed, our commitment to those families endures. They deserve true examples of discipleship, not false prophets.

In this moment, we reaffirm our mission: to walk with all people who are poor and marginalized, to welcome immigrants and refugees, to defend the dignity of LGBTQ+ persons [Imagine my shock!], and to labor for peace in a world saturated with violence. These are the marks of authentic discipleship. These are the qualities of saints.

We urge our Church leadership, including Cardinal Dolan, to lift up witnesses whose lives truly reflect the Gospel of Jesus Christ – lives of humility, justice, compassion, and peace.

We will continue to pray for Mr. Kirk, his family and for all who mourn his loss. [I’ll ask…  how exactly, concretely, will you pray for Charlie Kirk and family and ALL who mourn his loss?  Really.  I’d like to know. What will that prayer look like, sound like.  What words – still important now that you made a public promise –  will you use?  Tell us, Sisters, WHAT is your prayer?]

Leadership Team, Sisters of Charity of New York

Sr. Donna Dodge, Sr. Margaret O’Brien, Sr. Mary Mc Cormick,

Sr. Mary Ann Daly, Sr. Sheila Brosnan, Sr. Margaret Egan 9/24/2025

So… what do you think of this attack on Dolan and Charlie Kirk?

Posted in SESSIUNCULA, The Drill, Women Religious, You must be joking! | Tagged ,
23 Comments

My View For Awhile: north

And so it begins.

There were slow downs on the Interstate on the way to the airport, which are annoying. But security was fast.

The flight is at an awkward time. When I rose I didn’t have much to fuel my rapid pre-trip chores.

I found this, which didn’t cost $15.

Such bounty.

UPDATE

The flight is jammed. I missed an upgrade by one slot.

Lot’s of babies. Objectively a good thing. I hope they don’t have pain from the pressure changes.

UPDATE

I was just fetched up to biz!

A text came in, the color of my pass changed, they came to get me.

However some guy had taken it on himself to take my seat, so I’m in the less desirable front row. Something about wanting to sit with his wife. A likely story.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on My View For Awhile: north

Michael Knowles stepped in for Charlie Kirk yesterday: Traditional Latin Mass

Did you see that Michael Knowles stepped in for Charlie Kirk yesterday at the University of Minnesota?

HERE

He spoke several times about the Traditional Latin Mass.

48:30
1:09:00
1:12:00 etc 1:13:36

Posted in Just Too Cool, Our Catholic Identity | Tagged
6 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1439

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HERE – UK HERE  WHY?  I get a small percentage.  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

Welcome registrant:

MSolomon

Like something else I posted recently… not good.

My old place….

Black to move and mate in 3.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Interested in learning?  Try THIS.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
5 Comments

23 Sept – Latin Collect for St. Pio, Padre Pio of Pietrelcina

It took some time but I dug up the Latin Collect for St. Pio, Padre Pio of Pietrelcina Pio of Pietrelcina 23 Sept

Collecta

Omnípotens sempitérne Deus, qui sanctum Píum, presbýterum, crucis Fílii tui singulári grátia partícipem esse donásti, et per eius ministérium misericórdiae tuae mirabília renovásti, concéde nobis, ut, eius intercessióne, passiónibus Christi iúgiter sociáti ad resurrectiónis glóriam felíciter perducámur. Per Dóminum nostrum.

This could be used in the TLM.

Corpus Christi Watershed has a PDF with the chants for his Mass with the 1962 Missal.  HERE  The Introit is Os iusti.    The readings assigned in the NO are (EP) Gal 2, 19-20 (GOSP) Mt 16:24-27.

HERE

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged
1 Comment

REVIEW: Lumen Christi: Defending the Use of the PRE -1955 Roman Rite – UPDATED LINK

You may recall that a little while ago I posted a video of my unboxing of a new reprint of a pre-1955 Missale Romanum, beautifully bound. There is a growing interest in the pre-1955 Roman Rite. In most places the 1962 Missale Romanum is used where the traditional Roman Rite is celebrated.

There are differences, and not just for Holy Week which are the most notorious.

I’m looking at a book called Lumen Christi: Defending the Use of the PRE -1955 Roman Rite by A Benedictine Oblate (Foreword by Peter Kwasniewski)

HERE

The title is clear.   Here is the TOC:

If you have a Kindle, you can read it instantly.
CLICK

There is a good resume of the history of the Roman Rite here.  The author defends the position that Quo primum really was intended to be “in perpetuity” and not merely until another Pope decided to make major changes.

The book goes into the infamous secret 1948 Commission for Liturgical Reform.  This lead to the changes to Holy Week.  Here’s a sample:

THE 1948 LITURGICAL COMMISSION
The Commission for Liturgical Reform was established by Pope Pius XII in Rome on May 28, 1948, and overseen by the Congregation of Rites. This Commission marked the beginning of deliberate efforts to adapt the liturgy of the Catholic Church to the modem world. This is a peculiar idea. The idea of adapting the Mass to a world entrapped in modernism was quite foolish. This Commission was the beginning of the end of the authentic Roman rite. The Commission was led by Fr. (later Cardinal) Ferdinando Antonelli, OFM; its secretary was Fr. (later Arch-bishop and alleged Freemason) Annibale Bugnini, CM. These men were also among the architects of the Noma Ordo Mime. As Bugnini stated, the Commission revolved around “ranking feasts on theological grounds,” which, “although complicated, artificial and practically impossible to implement,” laid the groundwork for the reform.26 A significant step was the third supplement, which considered “historical, hagiographical and liturgical mate-rial” in order to conceptualize a calendar that later influenced the Pauline rite of 1969.27 Bugnini notes how the Commission’s efforts marked the first step in a movement that saw the supposed restoration of the ancient Easter Vigil, accomplished in 1951, “which elicited an explosion of joy throughout the Church.”28 However, Bugnini stated that the work of the group was no longer about preserving tradition. Rather, it was about the “liturgy [being] at last launched decisively on a pastoral course,”29 which culminated in the destruction of the ancient Holy Week rites and in the new code of rubrics established in 196o. The aim of the group was to outline the steps needed to bring to birth a new liturgy in the Church, one that was adapted to the times. The Commission was officially disbanded in 1959, with the establishment of the Conciliar Preparatory Commission for the reform of the liturgy. This reveals a connection between the 1948-1959 reforms and the establishment of the Novae Ordo Mitrae. Reflecting upon the Pian Commission, Bugnini stated that when “the Council was announced and new reforming currents of thought exerted their superior pressure, the Johannine liturgical renewal lost a good deal of energy.”30 This energy would later be recovered and concentrated on the reforms that emerged from 1964-1974.

[…]
It is important to note that although the Commission “worked in absolute secrecy,” its members “enjoyed the full confidence of the pope.”” This ensured that Pius XII was kept informed on their intentions and plans. Bugnini was asked to join the Commission as its secretary; he was at the time the director of a publication that spoke of supposed errors in the liturgy and the ways in which these could be mitigated.33 The Commission enjoyed its secrecy and papal approval to the extent that its “publication of the Ordo Sabbati Sancti instaurati at the beginning of March 1951 caught even the officials of the Congregation of Rites by surprise.”34 Although the reforms were created by a group of individuals, they had to be signed into force by Pope Pius XII. This, in effect, implicates Pius XII for the reforms. Being the Vicar of Christ upon earth, it was his personal responsibility to safeguard the doctrine and liturgy of the Church. In Assisi, Pius XII claimed that the reforms started by the Commission were “a sign of the providential dispositions of God for the present time [and] of the movement of the Holy Spirit in the Church?”35

BTW… John XXIII refused to use the 1955 Holy Week and, instead, used the pre-55!  There is a photo in the book.

The author has a sense of humor.  This footnote amused me.  I had the same reaction.

25 Cantors note that chanting the Bea psalter is quite nauseating. It is often lamented that the Propers of Masses created under the reign of Pius XII use the Bea psalter. Some examples include the new Assumption Mass and the feast of Pope St. Pius X. When a person accustomed to the Vulgate reads the antiphons, it is like hitting massive speed bumps.

A sad note: I have a one volume – for the whole year – Roman Breviary, an exciting find.  What a let down that it has the appallingly bad Bea Psalter.  I digress.

This note is great also:

16 One may jest and say that Traditionis Custodes refers neither to the missal of 1962 nor to the missal of the classical Roman rite, but rather the 1965 missal simply because it uses the term “the missal antecedent to the reform of 1970.”

Excellent.

I learned a great deal from this book.   It reads easily.  It does suffer from the lack of an index.   I warmly recommend it for the history if for nothing else.

 

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, REVIEWS, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
13 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1438 – A grave disservice

Photos from The Great Roman™

Welcome registrants:

GandalfTheWhite
threeriverstrad
Kizito

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HERE – UK HERE  WHY?  I get a small percentage.  This helps to pay for health insurance, utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

And this…

And… I recall the late great Msgr. Dulac’s (philosophy prof at St. Thomas in St. Paul) comments on his … acuity.

And now another thing altogether….

And now Legolas feel silent, while the others talked, and he looked out against the sun, and as he gazed he saw white sea-birds beating up the River. “Look!” he cried. “Gulls! They are flying far inland. A wonder they are to me and a trouble to my heart. Never in all my life had I met them, until we came to Pelargir, and there I heard them crying in the air as we rode to the battle of the ships. Then I stood still, forgetting war in Middle-earth; for their wailing voices spoke to me of the Sea. The Sea! Alas! I have not yet beheld it. But deep in the hearts of all my kindred lies the sea-longing, which it is perilous to stir. Alas! for the gulls. No peace shall I have again under beech or under elm.

~ J.R.R Tolkien, The Return of the King

Peter Jackson has done us a grave disservice.

Black to move.

NB: I’ll hold comments with solutions ’till the next day so there won’t be “spoilers” for others.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
7 Comments

I have thoughts about Charlie Kirk.

I have thoughts about Charlie Kirk.

In no order.

  • I constantly say that we should not canonize the dead. We should pray for them and not presume, even when manifestly holy people die with the sacraments and Apostolic Parson. I hesitate about the language of martyrdom. However, we may be seeing a vox populi moment. If Charlie was not formally a Catholic, reports are he was in motion.  Was he a martyr in the Catholic technical sense?  That’s not an easy argument, lacking more evidence about whether or not he desired to become a Catholic.  However, non-Catholics were “martyred” with St. Charles Lwanga… and for a related reason.
  • I hadn’t followed him much, because I thought he was mostly involved in politics. I didn’t know how he had evolved. Since his murder, I’ve see many videos. Amazing young man.
  • Over the week and more I’ve had a hundred conversations in which Charlie Kirk came up, mostly with older people … like me. Inevitably the phrase, often from me, came up, “this feels like a turning point”. Tonight I’m watched the – let’s say it – rival in Arizona. It suddenly hit me – am I thick or what? – “Turning Point”. Duh.
  • I watched the speech by Erika. I’m a pretty hardened guy with, as one of the Chieftans put it, with a heart as cold as a frog on a mountain. When she forgave Charlies murderer, I emitted a sob. Please don’t tell anyone. I am once again lacking a pulse. At least a regular pulse.
  • A challenge has been issued from the enemy, which aims directly at what the Enemy has been trying to destroy. We need men who act like men and women who act like women. Put that before the Enemy and instantly the frothing and gnashing like Moria goblins begins. That’s the proof.
  • I’m a pretty simple guy: God, family, country.  Live your vocation with grace and elbow grease.  Isn’t that what he was doing?
  • It might be good for people to attend CCW classes. If for nothing else that the training teaches situational awareness and de-escalation.
  • Erika said that he left her notes asking “How can I serve you better?”
  • I believe that Charlie would eventually have become a Catholic.
  • I hope that Charlie’s faith challenge, and Erika’s talk, will place the best kind of seed in Pres. Trump’s heart. There are marriage issues, after all. That’s not a political issue, but being also in the state of grace might increase what Archbp. Caroll said: “that his administration may be conducted in righteousness and be eminently useful to your people over whom he presides”.
  • Rubio and Vance would make good presidents.
  • Charlie started his campus “Prove Me Wrong” in Madison, where I was. Where I was before I wasn’t… thanks for that.
  • I think that it was way out of his lane when POTUS said, “Sorry, I can’t stand my opponent” at a rally for Charlie Kirk after Erika said “I forgive him.” There wasn’t a lot of applause for him on that.
  • I was annoyed that POTUS veered into politics. Sure, I know that he repeats and repeats and repeats so that eventually sound bites get even to the left. But… damn. Really?
  • Above the above, yes, POTUS talked about MAGA, but so did Charlie. The topic was not off limits. Still. Was this the moment? People were quieter than for other speakers. I don’t think he read the room. It wasn’t an campaign stop.
  • I believe that POTUS sorrow for Charlie was much deeper than the loss of a political ally.
  • One of the speakers at the “revival” in Arizona said that in the last few days, he has spoken more about Jesus than he ever did before.
  • There are things POTUS says that I don’t like, but he is getting things done. Would that he also had the support of sanctifying grace. I don’t presume to judge the ways of God, but I think we can be skeptical.
  • “Medal of Freedom. Absolutely. At least Rush got it before he died.
  • It was good for POTUS to show with a lot of the administration. That’s wasn’t only politics. It was clearly personal.
  • I think POTUS should have let Erika be the last speaker. She came out at the end, but still.
  • Was Charlie a martyr? Evidence is still coming out, so to speak, but martyrs are killed because of hatred of the faith or because of some aspect integral to the faith. For example, if you defend your chastity and you are murdered for it, you are a martyr.
  • I appreciated seeing this rally and the public witness to Jesus. Seeds are being scattered. I trust that iron is being put into male backbones and other things.
  • I couldn’t watch chess videos tonight.
Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
23 Comments

OUTGOING Bp. Garcia of Monterey suppresses the 17 year long TLM community

The pogrom goes on.

It goes on despite not knowing what Leo XIV has in mind.

The OUTGOING/GONE Bishop Garcia of Monterey (California) is terminating the TLM that has been going on for 17 years.  Yes, “out”.  Bp. Daniel Garcia was named Bishop of Austin on 2 July 2025, but he has still been running Monterey.  Figure that out.

He was installed by Francis in Monterey in 2018.  He was named by Leo XIV to Austin on 2 July 2025 and he was installed in Austin on 18 September 2025…. four days after he signed this letter.

On 19 September, Bishop Slawomir Szkredka was named Apostolic Administrator of the Diocese of Monterey in California.

Now he shuts down the TLM?  Before a new bishop can be appointed to Monterey who might want to make his own decisions?

I wish that people would send photos that were straight on, so that they could be more easily OCR’d.  Saves a lot of time.

NB: Two full pages of justifications.

I note a couple of things.

Firstly, he based his action on Traditionis custodes (aka Taurina cacata), which we now know was based on a falsehood: the claim that the majority of bishops surveyed leaned toward negative when it was in truth the opposite.  The whole thing is an unjust and cruel house of card.

He wrote: “The primary focus of every bishop… is to lead the Church toward unity.”

One can defend that to an extent (cf. LG23, UR 5).  However, it seems to me that the primary focus of every bishop should be the sanctification and salvation of souls.  Moreover, why does “unity” in the minds of these bishops mean “uniformity”?  He used the word “unity” 8 times on the first page, 3 times in one paragraph, 2 times in another, plus 4 times on the second page.

He wrote:  “rare situation… of having two liturgies being celebrated in the one Latin Rite.”

Has this bishop never heard of the Ambrosian Rite?  Braga Rite? Lyonnaise Rite?  The Mozarabic Rite?  How about the so-called Zaire Rite?  And there’s the Dominican Rite, the Cistercian Rite, Norbertine Rite…. For dumb.

There is this howler:  “Whoever wishes to celebrate with devotion according to earlier forms of the liturgy can find in the reformed Roman Missal according to Vatican Council II, all the elements of the reformed rite….”

I don’t even know where to start.  Shall we start with the massive redacted orations or the offertory prayers?  There is a list.

I’ll pass over the shallow reference to “active participation”.  He has an MA in liturgy from the liberal St. John’s University in Collegeville, MN.

There’s this:

“There is also the matter of the Pastor there at Sacred Heart and St. Benedict’s being able to give his full attention to the entire parish rather than taking his limited time spent with a small group of individuals who are not worshiping according to ordinary (and one) right of the Latin Church.”

Wait just a cottin pikin’ minute!   What about “the periphery”?  What about the good shepherd (aka pastor) seeking out the minority?   This underscores the condescension toward the people who want the traditional sacred worship.

Those people… who do different things…”.  Thank heaven I’m not like that group over there!  We stand in unity to get the white thing. Not like those people, who kneel a lot. All that bowing and scraping.  They don’t sing our unity songs, like “One Bread, One Body”, “Gather Us In” and “Make Us One”.”

Did you notice that he says he sent various people to talk to the TLM community: The chancellor, the director of the tribunal.  He consulted the vicar general and presbyteral council.  This is all “cover”, of course.   However, note that he does not say that HE met with them.

Then comes the oily close:

I invite you all to join in unity with the parish of Sacred Heart and St. Benedict, and in cooperation with your pastor, as they gather around the table of the Lord celebrating the rich Eucharistic Sacrifice, each Sunday, which has been a great fruit of the Council.  May this a liturgy charge your hearts with charity and trust to build the unity Pope Leo spoke about in the Mass he celebrated early in his pontificate in St. Peter’s Square: …

He goes on to give a quote from Leo about the macro view of the Church which has effectively nothing to do with the micro situation of Monterey.

Yeah… this is going to persuade.

Note the “rich Eucharist Sacrifice… a great fruit of the Council”.  Since the Eucharistic Sacrifice is from the Lord at the Last Supper, he can only mean the Novus Ordo.  I would challenge him to explain the results of the survey a few years ago revealing that some 60% of Catholic’s don’t believe what the Church teaches about transubstantiation.  Since those people probably have contact with something, anything, Catholic only on Sunday for Mass, I think we can draw a line more or less straight between how Mass is celebrated and what people believe… sorry, don’t believe.

Other demonstrable fruits of the Council have without question been the huge increase in vocations to the priesthood, the building and filling of new convents, long lines at confessionals, the increased number of weddings and bapt…. oh, no, wait!

Those things happen among the more traditionally inclined.  My bad.

Finally, the letter was dated “September 14, 2025”.

The Feast of the Exaltation of the Cross.

18 years to the day that Summorum Pontificum went into effect.

What a cheap shot.

In the end, it is about their dislike not just of the traditional Roman Rite, it’s about their dislike of the people who desire it.  They don’t like the people.

What a disappointment.

Those poor people.

It looks like bishops are moving fast to smash the traditional faithful before Leo or the next bishop can do something.

Also, can. 428 §1 says:

“When a see is vacant, nothing is to be altered.”

The Diocese of Monterey was vacant when Garcia signed that letter.

UPDOWNDATE:

Posted in Benedict XVI, Pò sì jiù, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices, The Last Acceptable Prejudice, Traditionis custodes | Tagged ,
26 Comments

WDTPRS – 15th Sunday after Pentecost: Is the Church is taking on water, sinking?

For the last few years I’ve had a terrible inkling that the Church hit an iceberg and is taking on water faster than it can be pumped.

It has ever been so, in cycles, since the Lord’s Ascension.

The Church will not sink, capsize or founder.

The Church, guaranteed by Christ to remain, will come to safe harbor even if in a single life boat.

Christ is our vessel, sails, oars, wind and navigator.

This Sunday’s Collect for Holy Mass in the Traditional Roman Rite survived the long knives of the Consilium to live on the in the Novus Ordo editions of the Missale Romanum on Monday of the 3rd Week of Lent.  Figure that one out. We find it in the 8th century Gelasian Sacramentary for a Sunday, with a minor spelling variation.  Hence, it is ancient.  There are reasons to think that the prayer is even more ancient.  Here is the text:

COLLECT (1962MR):

Ecclesiam tuam, Domine,
miseratio continuata mundet et muniat:
et quia sine te non potest salva consistere;
tuo semper munere gubernetur.

Interesting.  Usually in our Collects when we address God we add other adjectival phrases like “Omnipotens sempiterne”.  The spare “Domine” only occurs three other times (2nd Sunday of Advent, 2nd and 11th Sunday after Pentecost).

The word order is also noteworthy.  We begin with “Ecclesia tuam”, for indeed it is.  Also, in the last colon, that tuo semper munere gubernetur has a double, interlocking hyperbaton: tuo separated from munere and semper separated from gubernetur.   Moreover, in that second colon of the protasis, we have not two, but three petitions.  Easy to spot are mundet and muniat, but there is one buried in continuata miseratio.

We must not pass over the sound of this prayer.

The Roman, Latin prayers, particularly those which were handed down intact from earlier centuries, such as the time of St. Pope Leo the Great (+461), are elegantly sculpted both in their rhythm and their sounds.  Notice the wonderful alliteration throughout.  Tying the whole thing together from top to bottom are the glottal sounds (made in the back of the throat with the tongue), on the voiced or unvoiced glottal “k” sound of Ecclesiamcontinuata…quia…consistere…gubernetur.    Then we have an interlocking series of alliterations.  There are many humming “m” and “n” sounds: Ecclesiam tuam, Domine, miseratio continuata múndet et múniat…. Keep in mind that in ancient times, the final “m” was pronounced in a very nasal way, which survives in many instances in French and Portuguese.  So, this pray begins with a deep hum.  Then you shift to sibilants, the hissing “s”, with snappy “t”s along the way: et quia sine te non potest sálva consístere; tuo semper….  Then we go back to our humming “m” and “n”, but with a lovely rhythmical closure or clausulasemper múnere gúbernétúr.

Speak or sing this to get at the real beauty of this gem, with its glittering facets of phonemes.

And now vocabulary.

Gubnero was a favorite word of the great ancient Roman orator Cicero.  That feast of Latin lemmata, our thick and juicy Lewis & Short Dictionary,  says guberno is “to steer or pilot a ship”.  Logically, it also means “to direct, manage, conduct, govern, guide”. The Liddell, Scott, Jones Greek Lexicon, or LSJ, says that kubernao is “steer”, “drive” and metaphorically “guide, govern” and then “act as a pilot, i.e., perform certain rites in the Ship of Isis”.

I can’t quite imagine – don’t want to imagine – what those “rites of Isis” are.  I suspect they are used now by certain Jesuits.

The super-charged word munus is a little hard to get at in English is this Collect.  A munus can be “a service, office, post, employment, function, duty”.  Should we avoid reducing God to a functionary?   It is true that God is often said in our prayers to have pietas, which carries a strong sense of “duty”, but in Latin prayers pietas, when applied to God, is really more like “mercy”.  For man the term pietas  is “duty”.  In this instance of munere, we ought to lean toward another, less common meaning in the L&S, namely, “a service, favor”.  In fact the liturgical Latin dictionary we call Blaise/Dumas has, “don, faveur (de Dieu)”.   There is a connection between munus as “duty, service” and as “gift”, in that munus stood also for a public work given to the city by an individual. For example, a great Roman might put on public games and feasts for the people, or erect a temple or public building as a munus given from civic duty as well as to increase his and his family’s gloria, that is, his share in the honor of the state.

Concerning the debate about the meaning of munus in Benedict XVI’s odd resignation speech, we must note what Card. Erdö concluded in his paper on the uses of munus, ministerium and officium.  They are used in a virtually interchangeable way across different genres of documents.  Therefore, he said that clearer definitions were needed.  This was years before Benedict issued his notification about quitting (aka running from the wolves?).  I digress.

The verb consisto is “to stand still, stand, halt, stop, make a stop” but also many other sorts of “taking a stand”, such as what soldiers do when about to fight, or what you do in court to defend your position.  There is a “moral” stand one takes, as well as “stand with” someone.  However, both in the L&S and Blaise/Dumas we see that consisto can simply mean “to be, exist”.  In fact, this notion of “standing” (sisto) is also the root for existo.  It is as if, in the case of the later, that as things come into being, they “stand forth” (ex-sisto) from nothingness.

It seems to me that our author was also having a good time with the similar sounds of mundet, muniat, and munere, all very different but with phonic hooks that pull them conceptually together.

This week allow me also to play around with some alliteration in rendering our prayer, still sticking to a slavish version of the Latin lines.  I will also try to capture something of the nautical imagery.

LITERAL TRANSLATION:

Let Your continuous compassion, cleanse and defend Your Church, O Lord, and because without You she cannot stand to, safe, may she forever by Your favor be steered.

Nota bene: The subject is miseratio continuata, not Domine.  But the real subject is Domine, right?  Miseratio is a replacement or personification: the Lord is Mercy Itself.

In nautical parlance, to “stand to” means to “stay on a certain course”.  This is how I try to unpack the meaning of consisto, which aims at the concept of “consistency” and “staying” firm.  Because in this world the Church is on a journey, as a pilgrim, I didn’t want simply to say “stand firm”.  But gubernator, as the master of the ship’s course, who “governs” where the ship goes, helped me think of “stand to”.  Also, I could have said “safely”, but salva is an adjective, not an adverb, and I am feeling a bit more archaic than usual as I write today.

CURRENT ICEL VERSION (2011 – during Lent):

May your unfailing compassion, O Lord, cleanse and protect your Church, and, since without you she cannot stand secure, may she be always governed by your grace.

They didn’t go for the nautical image.  Too bad.  It is impoverished as a result.

One of the meanings of munio, which gives us the muniat in the prayer (“to build a wall around, to defend with a wall, to fortify, defend; to guard, secure, strengthen, support”, for munio stems from moenia “walls”) is also “to open a road”,  viam munire.

Maybe we can get our heads into this prayer by thinking of the Church, often portrayed as a ship, as in Peter’s Barque or the sailing ship in the vision of St. John Bosco, as that fortified way through the heaving waters of the world, with its distractions both sensual and diabolical, that threaten to blow us off our course.

As they sail in dangerous waters, ships need a well-prepared steersman to govern her through the shoals and currents, to avoid the reefs and rocks hidden beneath the waves.

There are times when we have a following wind, that favors smooth and direct sailing.  At other times, we must tack back and forth to make slow headway, or even run before the wind when the sea and the storms rise in frightful force against us.

In all these conditions, the captain and navigator and steersman seek the best course for the good of the whole ship and all who sail in her, according to the charts available, personal experience, the smell of the wind, the look of the sea, and the map of the sun, moon and stars.

In many ways these images of the ship at sea exemplify the experience of the Church.  Our Popes, bishops and pastors seek the best course as they know how, seeking to guide the barque in perilous waters and times.

In his meditation for the Way of the Cross in 2005 Card. Ratzinger said:

Lord, your Church often seems like a boat about to sink, a boat taking in water on every side.

In his homily for the Solemnity of Sts. Peter and Paul in 2006 Benedict XVI said:

The Church – and in her, Christ – still suffers today. In her, Christ is again and again taunted and slapped; again and again an effort is made to reject him from the world. Again and again the little barque of the Church is ripped apart by the winds of ideologies, whose waters seep into her and seem to condemn her to sink. Yet, precisely in the suffering Church, Christ is victorious.

In his final General Audience (before quitting) in 2013 Benedict said:

I have felt like Saint Peter with the Apostles in the boat on the Sea of Galilee: the Lord has given us so many days of sun and of light winds, days when the catch was abundant; there were also moments when the waters were rough and the winds against us, as throughout the Church’s history, and the Lord seemed to be sleeping. But I have always known that the Lord is in that boat, and I have always known that the barque of the Church is not mine but his. Nor does the Lord let it sink; it is he who guides it, surely also through those whom he has chosen, because he so wished. This has been, and is, a certainty which nothing can shake.

Well… most of them them try to steer well and make the right decisions about wind and wave.  Some do it well.  Others … not so much.

In human terms we do our best to steer our course and we can make mistakes.

In divine terms we know that no matter how terrifying are the winds and seas which buffet us and threaten to bear away our spars and sails, Christ’s sure hand rests on the wheel.

QUAERITUR: Right now, perhaps we have a Pope who is … what would you say?   Tacking?  Running before the wind?

We can take a couple things from this.

It might feel sometimes that the Church heading for this…

Instead of this…

Firstly, nothing contrary will prevent Holy Church from finding safe harbor in Him.  We will come home to a safe landfall.  Eventually, though storms and becalmings, we will make it.

Also, when we personally get off course, we can find our way back… in the confessional.

GO TO CONFESSION.

Posted in GO TO CONFESSION, WDTPRS | Tagged
3 Comments