#ASonnetADay – 94. “They that have power to hurt and will do none…” pic.twitter.com/VwY2NpMSME
— Fr. John Zuhlsdorf (@fatherz) November 19, 2020
If you are wondering, that target was at 30′, Glock 19.
#ASonnetADay – 94. “They that have power to hurt and will do none…” pic.twitter.com/VwY2NpMSME
— Fr. John Zuhlsdorf (@fatherz) November 19, 2020
If you are wondering, that target was at 30′, Glock 19.
The other day a friend of mine was driving through town on his way to his ancestral place and he dropped by for some supper. Astute and considerate, he had spotted in a used bookstore a slim volume he thought I might enjoy, both for the fact of of the practical application of its contents but also for the sake of its ethos.
I present the Nero Wolfe Cookbook

Less expensive newer edition: HERE and HERE
There are some great breakfast ideas within along with great old photos of New York City.

I’m glad to have this. On Amazon it seems to be pretty spendy, but it could be that you can find a used copy or even get it from a library, which often have lots of cookbooks.
It also spurred in my memory an old post about memorable meals in literature, which I repost hereunder.
___
A friend – quite the eclectic reader – sent an interesting piece from The Telegraph of a few years back.
10 Great Meals In Literature
Wow. Great idea. How did the selector do? Let’s see.
1) Mad Hatters Tea Party in Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll
2) The Episode of the Madeleine in In Search of Lost Time (Remembrance of Things Past) by Marcel Proust
3) Apple Pie and Ice Cream in On The Road by Jack Kerouac
4) Please, Sir, can I have some more from Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens
5) Gifts of Food in To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee
6) Try Pots’ steaming chowder in Moby Dick by Herman Melville
7) Melting Raclette cheese on a fire in Heidi by Johanna Spyri
8) Sandwiches and coffee in Millennium by Stieg Larsson
9) Cheese Sandwich and Malted Milk in The Catcher in the Rye by JD Salinger
10) Avocados in The Bell Jar by Sylvia Plath
How did he do?
I can think of a few others.
Did you know that the US Navy has its own forest in Indiana?
Here is a spiffing piece (originally at Military.com) I found at Task & Purpose.
Why the Navy manages its own private white oak forest
Maintaining a forest for ship building would make a lot of sense if ships were still made of wood. But they aren’t. So why does the U.S. Navy maintain a white oak forest in the middle of Indiana?
The white oak tree might have been the most fundamental building block of the young United States — literally. These giants provided the earliest Americans with shelter, built the country, laid the railroads that connected its coasts and kickstarted an industrial revolution.
From Maine to Florida and inland to the Great Plains and the American Southwest, white oaks were used to conquer the frontier, enforce U.S. foreign policy and kick the Royal Navy out of our waters. The USS Constitution, the only still commissioned ship in the U.S. Navy that has sunk another vessel, is made from that same white oak.
And the Navy needs to repair her from time to time.
[…]
At Naval Support Activity Crane, near Bloomington, Indiana the U.S. Navy maintains “Constitution Grove,” where a forest of white oaks are grown for the sole purpose of restoring and refitting the USS Constitution, the oldest commissioned vessel still sailing (the UK’s HMS Victory is older than Constitution, but remains in drydock).
[…]
Which it’s a very good read.
USS Constitution and HMS Guerriere.

This is interesting, especially in light of the Senate Committee questioning of our Big Tech Overlords.
Archbp. Viganò did a phone interview with EWTN’s Raymond Arroyo the other day.
Ed Pentin tried to post links to the video which was on YouTube.

I wonder what that is all about.
HOWEVER… HERE
And complete transcript HERE.
#ASonnetADay – 93. “So shall I live, supposing thou art true…” pic.twitter.com/efx841bUAJ
— Fr. John Zuhlsdorf (@fatherz) November 18, 2020
From a reader…
QUAERITUR:
My wife is pregnant and the baby is not doing so well (has a cystic hygroma and some heart issues – if you can pray for her, her name is Angela Fatima)…my question is a priest that we know wants to do the “anointing of the sick sacrament” on my wife. Is this ok? My wife is not in danger of anything. The baby may or may not make, but not sure if it’s ok for her to receive this sacrament. Let me know what you think.
First, I am very sorry for your worrisome situation. I’m sure people here will pray for you all.
We have to make some distinctions about who may receive the Sacrament of Anointing.
There are two people involved here, your wife and your unborn child.
The Sacrament of Anointing for those who are in danger of death. Pregnancy is not an illness, but rather a natural condition. If your wife is not in danger of death, she is not to be given the Sacrament.
Your unborn child does seem to be at risk. However, only those who have acquired the use of reason can receive the Sacrament of Anointing. Children are not give this sacrament unless they have attained the use of reason (can. 1004).
The primary purpose of the Sacrament of Anointing is to heal the soul, strengthen it for the trial and risk of death, and to arouse in the soul the love of God. A secondary effect can be physical healing. In the case that a person has unconfessed mortal sins, if the person is incapable of making a confession, the Sacrament of Anointing can remit sins. While an unborn child is a member of the human race, and therefore subject to Original Sin, the baby has committed no actual sins. This is another reason why children not given this sacrament. As the Council of Trent says: “[A]ll those who have not the use of reason are not fit subjects for this Sacrament; and likewise children who, having committed no sins, do not need the Sacrament as a remedy against the remains of sin.”
You definitely want to ask your priest for blessings for them both. There is a beautiful blessing in the traditional Rituale Romanum for women before childbirth.
I hope and pray that all goes well.
From a reader…
QUAERITUR:
I’m in formation for ordination to the NO diaconate in three years, Lord willing. I’ve been to one TLM mass in Florida years ago. My question concerns us faithful NO Catholics. When you say that the demographic sinkhole will make Traditionalists and Evangelical converts come together with the beauty of TLM, where does that leave us that are trying to be faithful in the NO? I greatly respect your opinion on this and thanks in advance!
I wouldn’t be overly concerned. This is not going to be a sudden change, even though the Wuhan Devil is accelerating the sinkhole.
I think it will happen. It seem inevitable to me.
Still, as a deacon, you should know your rite.
Learn to serve as a server and as subdeacon and as deacon for the Traditional Latin Mass, Low, Sung, and Solemn.
That ought to be part of your formation anyway. It’s your Latin, Roman Rite. You should know more than (the lesser) half of it. It is important for your identity as a deacon.
You might try The Celebration of Mass by O’Connell. Get familiar with the Roman Rite.
I am sure that many of you have heard about the famous American Carmelite Latinist Fr. Reginald Foster.
Some time ago a massive project was undertaken to publish books encompassing his method of instruction and his approach to Latin. The first book in the series came out some time ago.
The second book, I am informed, is being printed now by Catholic University Press.
Ossium Carnes Multae e Marci Tullii Ciceronis epistulis: The Bones’ Meats Abundant from the epistles of Marcus Tullius Cicero
US HERE (pre-order) – UK HERE (pre-order)
The first book…
Ossa Latinitatis Sola ad Mentem Reginaldi Rationemque: The Mere Bones of Latin According to the Thought and System of Reginald by Reginaldus Thomas Foster
The whole project will include five books.
The one I am really longing for has his legendary Ludi Domestici.
I think there are some gaps in the collection. If you have ever been in Foster’s experiences and have old sheets, HERE.
Tucker Carlson last night mentioned Archbp. Viganò. Perhaps he can be excused for mispronouncing his name. His point is good.
A friend let me know about this. I stopped watching Fox after “Election” night.
#ASonnetADay – 92. “But do thy worst to steal thyself away…” pic.twitter.com/AYh6kVJam8
— Fr. John Zuhlsdorf (@fatherz) November 17, 2020