There is a very good piece at The Catholic Thing by Anthony Esolen. Here is how it starts.
This is my geopolitical fiction,” Jesus did not say, when He broke the bread at the Last Supper. “The group, though it has many members, is still one group,” Paul did not say, when he sought, gently, to lead the fractious democracy-leaning Corinthians back to their responsibilities toward one another and their submission to the truth. “Every man is an island,” John Donne did not say in his meditations on death, so that if you hear the church bells ringing, he did not continue, “you need not ask for whom they toll, so long as they do not toll for thee.”
It is almost impossible, in our time of social alienation, family breakdown, self-imposed detachment, radical sexual individualism, and loneliness, to ask people to consider what a society is; a prerequisite, one might think, for considering the social teachings of the Church, or the social good or harm to be expected from a proposed policy.
Esolen has had to have meditated at length over “society”. I suspect this because he translated The Divine Comedy by Dante. In Inferno, the sins and their punishments reflect how they broke the bonds of society. That’s a key to understanding what Dante was doing. The Divine Comedy is also a socio-political treatise.
Here’s how his piece ends. It’s a staggeringly profound and yet smoothly simple observation. HOWEVER, if someone gets this wrong and starts to “jenga” pull this or that from the whole, the result is disaster.
All these teachings, then, are bound up in one body. They are alive, mutually reinforcing, coherent, dynamic. To suppose that they are separable is to treat the body as a corpse. Nor is there society in the tomb.
BTW… a couple of Cardinals, some aging feminists, and a bunch Jesuits are going to hate this article. So, share it around.