"The great Father Zed, Archiblogopoios"
- Fr. John Hunwicke
"Some 2 bit novus ordo cleric"
"Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a traditionalist blogger who has never shied from picking fights with priests, bishops or cardinals when liturgical abuses are concerned."
"Father John Zuhlsdorf is a crank"
"Father Zuhlsdorf drives me crazy"
"the hate-filled Father John Zuhlsford" [sic]
"Father John Zuhlsdorf, the right wing priest who has a penchant for referring to NCR as the 'fishwrap'"
"Zuhlsdorf is an eccentric with no real consequences" - HERE
- Michael Sean Winters
"Fr Z is a true phenomenon of the information age: a power blogger and a priest."
- Anna Arco
“Given that Rorate Coeli and Shea are mad at Fr. Z, I think it proves Fr. Z knows what he is doing and he is right.”
"Let me be clear. Fr. Z is a shock jock, mostly. His readership is vast and touchy. They like to be provoked and react with speed and fury."
- Sam Rocha
"Father Z’s Blog is a bright star on a cloudy night."
"A cross between Kung Fu Panda and Wolverine."
Fr. Z is officially a hybrid of Gandalf and Obi-Wan XD
Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a scrappy blogger popular with the Catholic right.
- America Magazine
RC integralist who prays like an evangelical fundamentalist.
-Austen Ivereigh on Twitter
[T]he even more mainline Catholic Fr. Z. blog.
-Deus Ex Machina
“For me the saddest thing about Father Z’s blog is how cruel it is.... It’s astonishing to me that a priest could traffic in such cruelty and hatred.”
- Jesuit homosexualist James Martin to BuzzFeed
"Fr. Z's is one of the more cheerful blogs out there and he is careful about keeping the crazies out of his commboxes"
- Paul in comment at 1 Peter 5
"I am a Roman Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
I am a TLM-going Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
And I am in a state of grace today, in no small part, because of your blog."
- Tom in comment
"Thank you for the delightful and edifying omnibus that is your blog."- Reader comment.
"Fr. Z disgraces his priesthood as a grifter, a liar, and a bully. - - Mark Shea
Resuming: His Eminence doesn’t like latin.
It remains mysterious to me how Anonymus could come to this conclusion…
Its not true that the Cardinal does not like Latin.When he was Archbishop,he made the rule that if a parish had 5 or more masses on a weekend,one of them had to be in Latin.He celebrated Mass in my parish and did not seem to mind the Latin.In fact hetold me after the mass,”This is the Dior of liturgy”.Also the priests at St.John Cantius wherehe has celebrated would find this remark strange.
I am glad to read Cardinal Arinze say this about Latin. For me this is the only New Springtime of the Church that interests me – the flowering again of the Latin Church with her Latin liturgy! From it flows the flowering and growing of everything else in the Church’s life.
The Arinze comments match what I heard about the recommendation made by a commission of Cardinals c. 1986–Latin mass once a week in big parishes, etc. Even Cardinal Casaroli was in favor of it.
But once word leaked out, bishops from France and Germany came whining to Rome . . . revolt . . . blah, blah, blah . . . schism . . . blah, blah, blah . . .
Then JPII reputedly put the document in a drawer, and those pastoral geniuses from France and Germany returned to their dioceses where the Church was flourishing.
Interestingly enough, some years later the MO of the French and German bishops re-surfaced–first, by ENRON in its accounting methods, then by Donald Rumsfeld to manage post war Iraq.
RBrown, you made a claim:
“The Arinze comments match what I heard about the recommendation made by a commission of Cardinals c. 1986Ã¢â‚¬â€Latin mass once a week in big parishes, etc. Even Cardinal Casaroli was in favor of it.
But once word leaked out, bishops from France and Germany came whining to Rome . . . revolt . . . blah, blah, blah . . . schism . . . blah, blah, blah . . .”
Could you substantiate that? The only “commission” at that time I know of was concerned with the Old Rite of Mass
His Eminence doesnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t like latin.
This really does not sound accurate. Not only has Card. Arinze consistently advocated regular Latin liturgy in parishes in statements made since becoming prefect of CDW, back when he was a “simple” archbishop in Nigeria, he insisted (according to one report) on this policy in his own parishes there. (I recall his remarking that some of the African people didn’t think a priest was properly educated unless he was competent in Latin. Of course, some of us think similarly regarding our priests in the U.S.) Beyond the level of policy, some of his remarks — including some on Vatican radio last week — indicate a warm personal affection for Latin in the liturgy.
I’m sorry! I made a littlle confusion with the cardinals!
I was present when the Cardinal in an address on catechetics he delivered at my parish remrked about how many languages were in his native country and that they had further dialects.He said Latin was a souce of unity in such a situation as well as a means to tribal peace.
`By the way where is the Apostolic Exhortation that reliable news sources said a month ago was “imminent”?Pope Benedict just said the other day that the exhortation will be the basis for the international eucharistic congress in2008.I hope the longdelayed and postponed document comes out before the congress begins. Its more than a year that the synod was ended and they are drawing up the lineaments for the next!I hope that the tardiness of the document points to the dramatic nature of its contents and that the recent reamrks of Arinze and his secretary are signs of what may be in it.
In an interview on EWTN with Raymond Arroyo about a year ago or more, the Cardinal stated that he loved Latin. I don’t remember the exact words, but the statement was very direct and clear.
“I hope that the tardiness of the document points to the dramatic nature of its contents and that the recent remarks of Arinze and his secretary are signs of what may be in it.”
There couldn’t possibly be any reason for the tardiness of the document but that the contents will be earthshaking, and many are trying hard to emasculate the post synodal document. And yes, I can’t help thinking that Cardinal Arinze’s remarks, coupled with everything else we’ve been hearing, are a sign of what the document will contain.
“RBrown, you made a claim:
Ã¢â‚¬Å“The Arinze comments match what I heard about the recommendation made by a commission of Cardinals c. 1986Ã¢â‚¬â€Latin mass once a week in big parishes, etc. Even Cardinal Casaroli was in favor of it.
But once word leaked out, bishops from France and Germany came whining to Rome . . . revolt . . . blah, blah, blah . . . schism . . . blah, blah, blah . . .Ã¢â‚¬Â
Could you substantiate that? The only Ã¢â‚¬Å“commissionÃ¢â‚¬Â at that time I know of was concerned with the Old Rite of Mass”
My only answer is that is what I heard in Rome in 86-87. That, even though the commission was concerned with the 1962 Missal, the recommendation was for weekly Latin masses.
But, let’s face it, Mass in Latin generally refers to the 1962 Missal–there are comparatively few Novus Ordo Latin masses. When I was in Rome, I knew many priests whose private morning mass was said in Latin. I knew no one who did a Latin Novus Ordo.
And it is not limited to Latin vs the vernacular. Almost any priest in a parish who says mass in the vernacular ad orientem is going to get in trouble.
Really? I go to a daily Latin NO…in So. California
Really? I go to a daily Latin NOÃ¢â‚¬Â¦in So. California
That’s good, but there is none to be found in the KC area.
And I don’t think I knew a priest in Rome who said a NO Latin private mass. Those who regularly did it in Latin used the 1962 Missal.