WDTPRS – 6th Sunday remaining after Epiphany: Wherein Fr. Z rants about authentic “active participation” at Mass

As we approach the end of another liturgical year, an odd thing happens in the Church’s traditional, pre-Conciliar calendar. The Sundays left over after Epiphany, after Christmas, are finally dusted off and prayed until the liturgical year is concluded.  This has to do with the vagaries of your Moon and shifting date of Easter, and therefore Ash Wednesday and Pentecost.  In some years the Sundays after Pentecost don’t take us all the way to Advent.  Thus, we pray the texts for the Sundays that we didn’t get to before Ash Wednesday.  Get it?

This week we use the 6th Sunday after Epiphany. This Collect happened to survive the snipping and cutting of the Consilium under the late Annibale Bugnini to live on in the Novus Ordo editions of the Missale Romanum as the Collect on the 7th Sunday of Ordinary Time.

Praesta, quaesumus, omnipotens Deus, ut, semper rationabilia meditantes, quae tibi sunt placita, et dictis exsequamur et factis.

Note the spiffy separation of et dictis…et factis by the verb.  Rationabilis is an adjective meaning “reasonable, rational”.

A Biblical source for part of the oration could be John 8:28-29:

So Jesus said, “When you have lifted up the Son of man, then you will know that I am he, and that I do nothing on my own authority but speak thus as the Father taught me.  And he who sent me is with me; he has not left me alone, for I always do what is pleasing to him (quae placita sunt ei, facio semper).

SLAVISHLY LITERAL VERSION:

Grant, we beg, Almighty God, that we, meditating always on rational things,
may fulfill those things which are pleasing to You by both words and deeds
.

I chose “rational” partly because of an association I made with a prayer attributed to St Thomas Aquinas which we students, trying to be serious and rational beings (cf. Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics 1,13 ), recited before philosophy classes lo those many years ago:

Concede mihi, miséricors Deus, quae tibi sunt plácita, ardenter concupíscere, prudenter investigáre, veráciter agnóscere, et perfecte adimplére ad laudem et gloriam Nominis tui.  Amen. …

Grant me, O merciful God, to desire eagerly, to investigate prudently, to acknowledge sincerely, and perfectly to fulfill those things which are pleasing to Thee, to the praise and glory of Thy Name.  Amen.

When we submit to God’s will and pursue what is good and true and beautiful, we are as God wants us to be.  It’s a lovely prayer before studying.  Perhaps you or your students could use it.  Great for the class room!

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973):

Father,
keep before us the wisdom and love
you have revealed in your Son.
Help us to be like him
in word and deed
.

Dreadful.  Good riddance.  Can you imagine the damage this stuff did over the years?  When I read that Mass attendance is down massively over the last 5 years in a place like the Diocese of Brooklyn, I don’t immediately blame present problems.  I also blame this dreck that people had to hear for decades.   We ARE our rites.  When this becomes part of their Faith foundation, what do we expect?

“Oh God, your Son was nice.  Help us to be nice like him.”   [VOMIT]

NEW CORRECTED ICEL (2011):

Grant, we pray, almighty God,
that, always pondering spiritual things,
we may carry out in both word and deed
that which is pleasing to you
.

I chose “rational things” for rationabilia.  The new, corrected ICEL has “spiritual things”, which is certainly defensible.  The French language dictionary of liturgical Latin by Albert Blaise revised by Antoine Dumas, for rationabilis, gives us “spirituel”. Blaise/Dumas also cites the ancient version of the very Collect we are looking at today, identifying it for the 6th Sunday after Epiphany in the 8th century Gregorian Sacramentary.

We are creatures made in the image and likeness of God.  We are made to act like God acts, using the gifts and powers of intellect and will He gave us.  These faculties are wounded because of Original Sin, but they still separate us from irrational animals.

Thus, we can distinguish between “acts of humans” (such as breathing and digesting) that are not much different than what brute animals do except that a human does them, and “human acts” (like painting, repairing a car, conversing, choosing to love) which involve the use of the higher faculties.

We must be interiorly engaged and focused with mind and will on the action we, as agents in God’s image, are carrying out.

This is important for understanding “active participation” in the liturgy.

Many people think “active participation” means carrying things around, clapping, singing, etc.  We can do all those things and actually be thinking about the grocery list or wondering what the score of the game is.  We all have the experience of catching ourselves whistling without realizing we were doing it, reading and not remembering what we just read.

We are doing something, but we are not acting as “humanly” as we ought.

That is not the kind of participation we need at Mass.

We must be actively receptive to what is taking place in the sacred action of the liturgy.

Watching carefully and quietly, actively receptive listening to the spoken Word or to sacred music, can be far more active than carrying things around, and so forth.

Active receptivity requires concentration and desire, mind and will.

It looks passive, but it isn’t.

We actively submit to Christ, the true actor in the Mass, and we actively receive from Christ.  He gives us what we need, not as if to passive animals, but as to His actively receptive and engaged images.

Inner participation leads to outward expression. The outward can also spark the inward.  The former, however, has logical priority over the latter.

Participation at Holy Mass in the Extraordinary Form can help us recover a deeper, fuller, more conscious and proper active participation in the Ordinary Form of the Roman Rite.

It has the harder elements of deprivation which lead to that indispensable apophatic encounter with Mystery.

This is also why our priests must always be faithful to tradition in the celebration of our rites.

Oh… one more thing.

The most perfect form of active participation is the reception of Holy Communion in the state of grace.

If you desire to participate at Holy Mass and other liturgical rites with full, conscious and actual, active participation, then…

GO TO CONFESSION!

About Fr. John Zuhlsdorf

Fr. Z is the guy who runs this blog. o{]:¬)
This entry was posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, WDTPRS, Wherein Fr. Z Rants and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Comments

  1. Jim Dorchak says:

    I always see your GOOD advice to go to confession.

    What is your advice on confession where you MUST sit in a chair with the priest next to you face to face?

    What is your opinion on CONFESSION BY APPOINTMENT ONLY policy.

    These are the conditions that I am required to endure here at our N.O Parish.
    For me I do not like the psychiatry approach to confession.
    I am not going there to feel better about myself but to save my soul.

    I am of course embarrassed about my sin even though I know my priest knows it is me when he can not see me in a NORMAL confession booth. I just feel very uncomfortable with that whole thing sitting in front of the priest and by appointment.

    So I do not go.

    I just seems like it is not…. ya know legit! Hey there goes jim into his private meeting with the priest (like the principals office), boy I bet he has been killing puppies and making fun of trans people or some such evil sin!

    It just does not seem conducive to a good confession.

    Also I HATE when the priest gives me a POOR or WEAK penance. It kind of invalidates my confession. It feels protestant. It ignores how much I hate my sin and have remorse and how I would like to pay for my transgressions.

    I have many times now asked for the priest to give me a stiffer penance.

    Just curious what you think about this Fr. Z.

  2. BeatifyStickler says:

    Thank you for this. I love that you say, we are our rites. It’s so obvious why numbers are the way they are. This is a topic that cannot be exhausted. I hope you write a book one day!

  3. Since I began regularly attending the TLM, I’ve come to view the NO Mass as the equivalent of “busywork.” We are always doing something, saying something, singing something. There is very little quiet for prayer.

  4. Simon_GNR says:

    Fr Z’s comments about how awful the 1973 ICEL version of the collect was reminds me of my former parish priest’s generalisation about all 1973 ICEL collects which basically all say: “O Lord, Bless us and make us good”.
    Infantile, juvenile and dumbed-down to kindergarten level. I think some bishop commented about the NO, even before the 1973 ICEL monstrosity, saying something like: “If we go along with this we’ll end up with a Church of women and children only.”

Comments are closed.