At Rorate I read some Q&A with Card. Roche of the Roman Dicastery tasked with liturgical issues, including persecuted the people who desire the Traditional Latin Mass. It’s not just about the form of Mass, it’s about the people… they don’t like the people.
In the interview Card. Roche said something that caught my attention. Do you read anything contradictory in this? Emphases mine.
For very good reasons, the Church, through conciliar legislation, decided to move away from what had become an overly elaborate form of celebrating the Mass.
When I was at school, I used to serve Mass, and the priest would say to me: “Remember, boy, it’s 20 minutes, amice to amice.” What he meant was that as soon as he put the amice [liturgical vestment] around his neck, I was to start counting the minutes until he took it off at the end of Mass. If, by chance, he reached the last Gospel by 15 minutes, I had to pull the back of his chasuble. It was a sort of scruple, I suppose, but something very different from what people experience in the Extraordinary Form today.
Very different from what people experience in the TLM today. Exactly.
On the one hand he said that the TLM was “overly elaborate”. On the other hand it could be said in 15-20 minutes. But it’s overly elaborate? One can surmise from this that that priest, whom Roche used as a negative example, was a massive liturgical abuser of the older rite. So the Rite he perhaps thinks of as the older, Traditional Rite, is not a good example. His thoughts are based on abuse, rather than proper use.
I don’t think that I could, even with my experience and speed, say Mass in 15 minutes. Even omitting the Dies Irae in a daily Requiem I don’t think I could do one in 20 and actually do everything. I am having a hard time getting my mind around what Roche said.
Okay, there’s another thing I didn’t quite get (and comments):
One of the things that has been very interesting to me is observing this situation worldwide. [Funny, that. Given that the TLM was “worldwide”.] The numbers devoted to the Traditional Latin Mass are, in reality, quite small, but some of the groups are quite clamorous. They are more noticeable because they make their voices heard. [I thought this was the age of “walking together”.]
So, they make their voices known. That’s good right? I think there is even a canon in Canon Law about that (cf. can. 212).
Oh yes… there is this.
In the lectionary from the Novus Ordo, there is a three-year cycle for Sundays and a two-year cycle for weekday readings. There is a much lower percentage of scriptural readings in the 1962 missal than there are in the newer missal.
There might be a lower percentage of total Scripture, but there is a vastly lower percentage of people hearing any readings in the Novus Ordo these days. So, how is that working out? Not only, ask people what the readings were as they are walking out of your average suburban church. The annual repetition of a core selection of pericopes helped to assure that Mass going Catholics – and so many more went to Mass – remembered and were, therefore, affected by what they heard. Am I wrong?
There’s a little more:
What interests me is why people get hot under the collar[that’s not dismissive] about others celebrating the Tridentine Mass. I think this has been a mistake. Bishop Wheeler, of the Diocese of Leeds, insisted that a Holy Mass be celebrated in Latin according to the Novus Ordo at least once every Sunday in every deanery. That showed considerable wisdom. [IT’S NOT JUST ABOUT LATIN.]
[…]
I often hear people say, “Cardinal Roche is against the Latin Mass.” Well, if they only knew that most days I celebrate Mass in Latin because it is the common language for all of us here. It is the Novus Ordo Mass in Latin. I was trained as an altar boy until the age of 20, serving the Tridentine Form.
Apparently his exposure to the Tridentine Form was… well… not what we have today. What did he say”
“something very different from what people experience in the Extraordinary Form today.”
Maybe, rather than crush out what is going on today, it should be given a try?

White to move and mate in 2. Tricky.
Ash Wednesday is NOT a holy day of obligation.

Chessy news… 








How about coffee in between meals on Ash Wednesday?
Drinks such as coffee and tea do not break the Lenten fast even if they have a little milk added, or a bit of sugar, or fruit juice, which in the case of tea might be lemon.




In chessy news…





















