ASK FATHER: What hobbies are permitted on Sundays?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

What hobbies are permitted on Sundays? I like to knit and crochet clothing and blankets for pleasure, but have heard that this is considered servile labor. Yes, perhaps historically this was work, but nowadays this is a welcome break from my actual labors. Please help me understand.

A question that is both simple and complicated.

Let’s start with a foundation: the 3rd Commandment of the Decalogue.  This is God’s positive law.

Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor, and do all your work; but the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God; in it you shall not do any work.  (Ex 20:8-10; cf. Deut 5:12-15.)

Several things.

First, Sunday, the “first day” and the “eighth day” (outside of time) is not “the sabbath”, which is the “seventh day”.  However, for Christians, we see the meaning of the sabbath fulfilled in Christ’s saving work and Resurrection. Hence, we rightly fulfil the observance of sabbath rest on Sundays.  This has been our Christian practice from the very beginning of the Church.

Second, “The sabbath was made for man, not man for the sabbath; so the Son of Man is lord even of the sabbath. (Mk 2:27-28)

Third, notice that the 3rd Commandment commands that we rest, but it also commands that we work.  It doesn’t suggest that we work.

Fourth, the sabbath (or the day that supersedes, Sunday) is “a sabbath to the Lord your God”.  Therefore, it involves not just rest from work but also worship.  Holy Church has a precept, a positive law founded in divine positive law, concerning the obligation to participate at Holy Mass on Sundays and other Holy Days of Obligation.  NB: All Sundays are Holy Days of Obligation.

Obviously we are not bound to do what is impossible.  If there is no Mass or we are impeded, there is no obligation.  That’s the stuff of other posts.

Fifth, a hobby can be work but it isn’t toil.  A hobby can very much be manual, but not servile (done in the manner of a slave, unavoidable).  And there is a difference between “work” and “toil”.  Because of the fall of our First Parents, much work has become toil.  But, as John Paul II explained beautifully, work gives us dignity, where toil… not so much.  Toil is a punishment due to Original Sin.

The sabbath obligation involves rest and worship.  Worship is pretty clear.  What is rest?

Let’s see the Catechism of the Catholic Church:

2185 On Sundays and other holy days of obligation, the faithful are to refrain from engaging in work or activities that hinder [1] the worship owed to God, [2] the joy proper to the Lord’s Day, [3] the performance of the works of mercy, and the [4] appropriate relaxation of mind and body. [Cf. CIC, can. 120.] Family needs or important social service can legitimately excuse from the obligation of Sunday rest. The faithful should see to it that legitimate excuses do not lead to habits prejudicial to religion, family life, and health.

The charity of truth seeks holy leisure- the necessity of charity accepts just work. [St. Augustine, De civ. Dei 19,19:PL 41,647.]  [“Leisure” or “otium” and the tension with”negotium”, the lack of otium is a constant theme for Augustine.  He longed for the one (for readings and praying) but was, as a bishop, constantly required for “business”.]

2186 Those Christians who have leisure should be mindful of their brethren who have the same needs and the same rights, yet cannot rest from work because of poverty and misery. Sunday is traditionally consecrated by Christian piety to good works and humble service of the sick, the infirm, and the elderly. [Doesn’t sound like “recreation” or a “hobby”.] Christians will also sanctify Sunday by devoting time and care to their families and relatives, often difficult to do on other days of the week. Sunday is a time for reflection, silence, cultivation of the mind, and meditation which furthers the growth of the Christian interior life.

2187 Sanctifying Sundays and holy days requires a common effort. Every Christian should avoid making unnecessary demands on others that would hinder them from observing the Lord’s Day. Traditional activities (sport, restaurants, etc.), and social necessities (public services, etc.), require some people to work on Sundays, but everyone should still take care to set aside sufficient time for leisure. With temperance and charity the faithful will see to it that they avoid the excesses and violence sometimes associated with popular leisure activities. In spite of economic constraints, public authorities should ensure citizens a time intended for rest and divine worship. Employers have a similar obligation toward their employees.  [There’s a reason why lots of people drive to Chick-fil-a instead of other places.]

Returning to the question, which includes:

“I like to knit and crochet clothing and blankets for pleasure…”

Whereas according to Jewish laws that might be prohibited as work on the sabbath, I cannot fathom how a Christian understanding of the sabbath would prohibit knitting for pleasure.   This is not exactly ditch digging, is it.  If you were a day laborer and an 18th c. Belgian lacemaker’s shop, with an exacting task master standing over you all the time, that might qualify as “servile work”.

Provided that significant, meaningful time is given to the worship of God and rest from work, it seems entirely within the bounds of the Decalogue and the Precepts of the Church to play some tennis (which is hard “work” but not “labor”), or to do some gardening (which can be strenuous and dirty, but quite therapeutic for some), or build a tree house for the kids (certainly involving heavy lifting and effort), cooking for the family (cooking is one of the most strenuous and even dangerous jobs I had in my life… in a restaurant kitchen, but at home for friends… hard? Sure.  A pleasure?  Da bomb!).

Avoid unnecessary work, toil.

Hobbies can be strenuous, but they are, by definition, leisure.  Challenging and exhausting doesn’t line up with onerous and wearying: the former can be restorative while the later are debilitating.

Note also the emphasis on works of mercy.  Talk about hard work!  But is that “labor”?  I guess so, in that it is a labor of love.  That which is done for charity, sacrificial love for the good the other, is entirely in the spirit of the 3rd Commandment, Christ’s gloss and personal example, the Precept of the Church, the Code of Canon Law, common sense….

There are some things which really need to be done on a Sunday.  For example, the toilet backs up.  Do you ignore it?  No.  The floor ought to be scrubbed.  Can it wait one day, for Monday?  Probably, unless its a health hazard.  Who knows what that stuff is on the floor that junior tracked in?   Dry wall has to be put up in the room that will become the nursery.  Can it wait?  The missus is due a) in 3 months or b) in 3 days.  Make the call.  AFTER Mass, perhaps you can get some of that work done on the nursery.

Friends, don’t torture yourself with Sunday rest or work.  It helps to have a plan for your Sunday, so you are not just bumping around.  Make sure you have time for rest – or what passes for rest when you have lots of kids or dependents or some activities helpful for others depend on you.  Never neglect worship of God.

By the way, I wrote this on a Sunday – and it is work to write this – as a spiritual work of mercy.

Office fulfilled, Mass celebrated, restorative nap checked off, now I shall play some chess.  And if you don’t think that that is work, you have never really played chess.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box | Tagged , ,
14 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes: 10th Sunday after Pentecost (N.O. 20th Sunday)

Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all. Share the good stuff.

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at your Mass of obligation for the 10th Sunday after Pentecost (20th Ordinary in the Novus)?

Tell about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass.  I hear that it is growing.  Of COURSE.

Any local changes or (hopefully good) news?

A few thoughts of my own, HERE.

Why and For What Am I Doing What I Am Doing?

Incipit…

My apologies for a rather briefer offering for the 10th Sunday after Pentecost, although I have in my mind’s eye an image of you doing a fist pump while exclaiming, “yesssss”.

This is in part a gesture of self-defense. In the Epistle reading, Paul tackles for the Corinthians the issue of idolatry. Idolatry is contrary to the “Spirit of God”. It is a way of saying “Anathema… Accursed”.. to Jesus. Invoking Pachamama or the Grandmother of the West in order to enter the “circle of spirits”, comes to mind, which prods me rather to reflect more about the Gospel than the Epistle for the sake of both space and my blood pressure.

[…]

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
1 Comment

YOUR URGENT PRAYER REQUESTS

PLEASE use the sharing buttons! Thanks!

In your charity would you please take a moment look at the requests and to pray for the people about whom you read?

Continued from THESE.

Let’s remember all who are ill, who will die soon, who have lost their jobs, and who are afraid.

I get many requests by email asking for prayers. Some are heart-achingly grave and urgent.

As long as my blog reaches so many readers in so many places, let’s give each other a hand. We should support each other in works of mercy.

If you have some prayer requests, feel free to post them below.

You have to be registered here to be able to post.

I ask a prayer for myself.  I’m dealing with a particular challenge right now.

Also, I received this note very late 13/14 Aug:

A young Polish priest from the FSSP, Fr. Krzysztof Sanetra, is currently in life threatening condition in an ICU in Poland. We do not have the details (he was away for his vacation) other than he was very sick and sent an email asking for prayers, but now the situation has turned dire and he’s in life-threatening condition.

Please, prayers from your readership. He’s only 37.

 

Posted in Urgent Prayer Requests | Tagged
10 Comments

ASK FATHER: “If I go to Saturday night mass and receive Communion, and then go also to Sunday mass, may I receive Communion again?”

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

Hello if I go to Saturday night anticipation mass and receive Holy Communion, and then go the following morning to Sunday mass, may I receive Holy Communion again? I have been told you cannot because it’s the “same Mass” and you can’t receive twice at the same Mass. Does anything change if one is Novus and one is Vetus? Thank you.

Yes.  You may receive Saturday evening and Sunday morning.

Let’s review.

The 1983 Code of Canon Law says:

Can. 917 – Qui sanctissimam Eucharistiam iam recepit, potest eam iterum eadem die suscipere solummodo intra eucharisticam celebrationem cui participat, salvo praescripto Can. 921, § 2.

Someone who has already received the Most Holy Eucharist can receive it again (iterum) on the same day only within the Eucharistic celebration [i.e. Mass, not a Communion service] in which the person participates, with due regard for the prescription of can. 921 § 2.

That iterum does not mean “again and again”, but merely “again, one more time”.

Note also, it says “on the same day”.  So, you scenario of different Masses on different days, a Saturday and a Sunday” doesn’t apply.

Also, that “Eucharistic celebration” in the canon does not mean just any service involving Communion. It means Mass. That was cleared up by the Holy See in an official response to a dubium, an officially proposed question.

That’s back when the Holy See answered dubia that weren’t crafted in house and then published as if they had been received from elsewhere.

So, say in the morning you attend a Novus Ordo Communion service wherein you receive Communion, or you went to a Mass in either Form. Later in the day you stumble into a church where Mass about to be celebrated and decided to stay for it. At that Mass you can receive Communion again (iterum). This would be even if you were, say, visiting a Maronite Catholic Church, or a Ukrainian Catholic Church and their Divine Liturgy was about to get under way.   This applies to Novus Ordo and Vetus Ordo, too.  It is indifferent.

However, if you were at Holy Mass in the morning and then stumbled into a Communion service at a priest-less parish in the afternoon, you could NOT receive again because a Communion Service isn’t Mass.

If you were at Mass in the morning and then in the afternoon when you were visiting your auntie in the hospital when the chaplain came, you could not receive even if the priest invited you to do so (which in my opinion he should not). However, if you stayed for another Mass at the hospital chapel immediately following, you would be able to receive.

Canon 917 tries to walk the line between promoting frequent reception of the Eucharist and a superstitious or excessive frequency, which – I can assure you – some people fall into.

The key here is that the second time must be during a Mass, and you may not enter the Mass at some late point merely in order to receive.

EXCEPTION:

Can. 921 § 2 says that if a person is in danger of death, he may receive Communion even it is not in the context of Mass. That is Viaticum.

If a person is dying, even if he has been to two Masses and received twice on the same day, he can receive Viaticum.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Canon Law | Tagged ,
9 Comments

And then there’s …

… this…

 

Posted in Lighter fare |
16 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 532, etc.

I renew my recommendation. It is an amazing window into the Rome of that time and, therefore, this.

The Genius in the Design: Bernini, Borromini, and the Rivalry That Transformed Rome by James Morrisey.

US HERE – UK HERE  – Amazing book.

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE  These links take you to a generic “catholic” search in Amazon, but, once in and browsing or searching, Amazon remembers that you used my link and I get the credit

It was my first day back playing OTB today, since May. I had a super advantage as black in the end game against a QGD, completely outplayed him.  Then I blew it and hanged mate. I was so stupid that I burst into laughter.  A good lesson.  Humiliating, but useful.

Sigh.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
Comments Off on Daily Rome Shot 532, etc.

Coincidences? I think not.

I recently wrote:

I am convinced that one of the reasons certain bishops and priests seem determined to suppress the TLM and isolate, marginalize the people who want it is because the TLM unsettles, disturbs, annoys, irritates, needles, vexes clerics involved in one of the sins that cries to heaven.

[…]

The first thing you would have to do is change the way people worship.  Change how they pray, and over time over time you change what they believe.    In the Vetus Ordo the changers perceive an obstacle to changing the Church’s doctrines, especially in the sphere of sexual morality.   Therefore, they must restrict access to public celebrations of the TLM and keep as many priests as possible from learning it.   Make sure the liturgy in churches and seminaries emphasizes – on a good day – the Resurrection aspect of the Paschal Mystery and eschatological joy for everyone.  Make sure people don’t hear too much about propitiation, sin, guilt and judgment (concepts consistently stripped out of the orations of the Novus Ordo).

At One Peter Five, Peter Kwasniewski (PK, hereafter) has a piece about remarks made by one of the über-haters of the Traditional Latin Mass, Andrea Grillo (aka Mr. Cricket).  He is a prof at Rome’s main liturgical school, Sant’Anselmo.  Without question he is one of the driving forces in Rome behind the attacks on the Vetus Ordo.

PK looked at one of Mr. Cricket’s recent articles (7 Aug) entitled with a double entendre, “Condoms for Sex and Ecclesiastical Preservation”. The Italian word for “condoms” is “preservativi”. In Italy, don’t ask for “preserves” for your bread and butter. This is the sort of humor Mr. Cricket seems to like. On his blog, Cricket has a photo of himself giving the world the finger.

Someone might say, “But Father!  But Father!  You have an active imagination.  That’s a perfectly innocent picture.  But you are the type who sees insults from every gesture of men like the esteemed professor because YOU HATE VATICAN II!”

Okay… why would anyone have this picture, for years?

Probably for the same reason that one of Francis’ closet advisers, if not the closest, fellow Jesuit Fr. Antonio “2+2=5” Spadaro maintains, under his own name, a website in honor of the late homo-erotic writer Pier Vittorio Tondelli.

There is an Italian proverb: “II diavolo non può nascondere la coda…. The devil can’t hide his tail.”   The idea is this: The Enemy of the soul and his agents will always tell you what they are up to.  Even when they try to fool you through the appearance of beauty, you will find not so well-hidden in it something ugly, twisted and vile. In plain sight.

Back to Mr. Cricket.

He offers an argument for the “reopening” of the question of contraception that is so tangled that it is risible.  PK did the heavy lifting at One Peter Five.   Suffice to say that one of the chief architects of attacks on the Vetus Ordo, because of his own gnostic insights into the ecclesiology blah blah of Vatican II, is arguing for a reinterpretation of the Church’s teaching on sexuality in marriage by the reopening of the question of contraception.

A couple things.

The rapid rise of homosexual advocacy in the Church… the subtle undermining of the integrity of marriage via paths to Communion for the objectively divorced and remarried… the effort to obscure and even chisel out John Paul II’s “theology of the body”, teaching on the family and foundation of moral theology in Veritatis splendor… the push to reinterpret all of the Church’s teachings, law and liturgy through the lens of whatever it is they glean from Vatican II… to unhinge the sexual act from procreation… to suppress the Vetus Ordo and all who want it…  these are all connected.

The Enemy always tells us what he is up to.

Posted in "But Father! But Father!", Pò sì jiù, Sin That Cries To Heaven, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged
18 Comments

Liturgical Question: Which of these is NOT like the other?

Which one of these things is not like the others?

A) Cross-hatched loaf.   Get a a little cheese, some slices of sausage, some wine… what’s not to like?

B)  Hot Cross Buns.  Hot from the oven!  Yum.

C)  The “bread” at the “cluster” in the Archdiocese of Milwaukee at St. Joan’s and St. Catherine’s (recently featured HERE).  They have their own bread ministry.  Often referred to by libs as “substantial bread”. It’s more meaningful, you see, because it looks nothing like a cow pie run over by a tractor, but like real bread.  Doesn’t it make you think of bread?  Immediately?  Consider the joiys of the texture!  Something like dried particle board.  Meaningful.  So are all the particles that scatter pretty much everywhere, uncontrollable.

D) Making hosts at St. Agnes Church in St. Paul for all the parish Masses.

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Speaking of “substantial bread”…

ANECDOTE: In my seminary in the USA – a horrible place filled with heresy and the black grief of the world – we had “substantial bread” that was so hard, so impossible to get down that even the liberals (the majority) complained about it.  We received back the answer from the faculty that – I am NOT making this up!

“The longer you chew, the more of a sacrament it is.”

To this day, that remark remains one of the stupidest things I have ever heard in a Catholic context.

Posted in Lighter fare, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, The Drill | Tagged
16 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 531, etc. – packed!

Catholic?  Have a site or web project?  The Catholic Signal Corps might be just the right resource for you.  Recently we helped Padre Pio Press.

Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance. US HERE – UK HERE  These links take you to a generic “catholic” search in Amazon, but, once in and browsing or searching, Amazon remembers that you used my link and I get the credit.

Today, 50 years ago in Iceland, not much is going on. The great match between Bobby Fischer and Boris Spassky resumes on 15 August.

Meanwhile, I know you are hungry for more chess lore.   I am working my way, slowly, through Birth of the Chess Queen: A History by a feminist writer.  It is interesting how in some books that have an ideological goal, or some TV series or movies, the first part is balanced and even-handed, nothing too forward.  Then, slowly but surely, less subtle comments or images are put it.  It’s as if they are thinking, “If he read/watched this far into the book/TV series/movie, he is hooked and won’t stop.  Now is the time to start putting in the a) ideology b) images of homosexual PDAs, c) propaganda.  Over time, it’ll have its effect in changing people’s views.  Just think Murphy Brown.”

Anyway, I am now at the chapter about the connection between devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary in the medieval period and the development of the Queen as a piece in chess.  So far, respectful, but there are a couple of little hints that more might be on the way.  All in all, when she talks about the great queens of, say, France, especially those descending from Eleanor of Aquitaine, such as the fabled Blanche, her daughter and mother of St Louis of France, she is respectful and laudatory about the fact that they had many children and were family in their families.  However, she usually at some point throws in a comment about how “misogynistic” prevailing attitudes were.  Yawn.  Really?

Anyway, I have picked up on one common theme about the transformation of the ancient Indian/Persian Elephant and the Islamic Vizier into the European Bishop.  In literature of the day, descriptions of chess, poetry about chess – don’t for a moment underestimate its importance and popularity – pieces had moral, ethical connotations too.  Bishops were in some places Jesters (the two pronged cap and bells hat probably being a version of tusks) or were considered as sneaky and devious, because they moved on diagonals.   Here’s one passage about the chess Bishop in the time of the great Eleanor.

But getting back to the bishop, he was generally not held in high esteem.  [Alexander] Neckham referred to him as a “spy” and the Winchester Poem called him a “thief.”  The very word aufin commonly used in French and English for this piece became a term of scorn or reproach in both languages.

US HERE – UK HERE

There are quite a few snarky remarks about the chess bishop.

No bishops in sight in this puzzle.  White to move and start the net, and I don’t mean ham radio.  You might be tempted by a distraction.  Don’t waste your time.

Thank to a few more readers who have used the Wavy Flag for my upcoming Roman October.  Every donation makes a difference.  In the last couple of days, I thank especially

WH, GG, MB

Mille grazie!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
1 Comment

ASK FATHER: A priest asks, “Is it okay to learn how to say the Traditional Latin Mass?” Wherein Fr. Z rants.

From a priest…

QUAERITUR:

Is it okay to learn how to say the Traditional Latin Mass?

Where are we at with the whole overblown, skewed notion of obedience and authority today that it would enter into a priest’s mind that it might to wrong to learn to say the TLM.  Not to say the TLM publicly in defiance of authority, though that will come to pass, I predict.  But just to learn how to say it?    This points to a whole other problem in the Church today, but I digress.  Back to the topic…

Not only is it okay to learn to say the TLM, it is NOT okay NOT to learn to say the TLM. 

I would, had I power, oblige every priest of the Latin Church, the Roman Rite, at least to learn it.

Why?  Not just because by learning it you learn more about your priesthood.

Why?  Not just because by learning it you will change the way you say the Novus Ordo.

Why?  Not just because by learning it you will spark a positive knock on effect among the people you serve.

Why? Not just because by learning it you will be better positioned when the lunacy of Taurina cacata has come to an end.

I am convinced that one of the reasons certain bishops and priests seem determined to suppress the TLM and isolate, marginalize the people who want it is because the TLM unsettles, disturbs, annoys, irritates, needles, vexes clerics involved in one of the sins that cries to heaven.

Even if these bishops and priests have never seen or been to a TLM in their lives, they know that the TLM would remind them of what the Novus Ordo does not: sin, guilt and judgment.

The TLM reminds priests in a sobering way about their failings as men and as priests, that they are unworthy sinners who, by the grace of God alone, can stand at the altar to renew the sacred mysteries.  This is one of the Church’s precious and encouraging gifts to priests.

Contrary to the claims of those who hate the Traditional Mass, it is the best antidote to clericalism that there is.

We are our rites.  A priest gains inestimable riches and insights into who he is at altar through a knowledge of and use of the Vetus Ordo.

Liturgy is doctrine.  This is part of the reason why certain powers that be and the wormtongues behind them want to suppress the Vetus Ordo.

Say you want to change certain doctrines, not evolve organically and consistently, but just change.   With me?

The first thing you would have to do is change the way people worship.  Change how they pray, and over time over time you change what they believe.    In the Vetus Ordo the changers perceive an obstacle to changing the Church’s doctrines, especially in the sphere of sexual morality.   Therefore, they must restrict access to public celebrations of the TLM and keep as many priests as possible from learning it.   Make sure the liturgy in churches and seminaries emphasizes – on a good day – the Resurrection aspect of the Paschal Mystery and eschatological joy for everyone.  Make sure people don’t hear too much about propitiation, sin, guilt and judgment (concepts consistently stripped out of the orations of the Novus Ordo).

Cut them off from their roots in what their forebears believed and built.

Atomize them into smaller and smaller communities, each with its own liturgical expression, each with a language that keeps them from praying together as one.

Dumb it all down.

Isolate and bully.

You’ll get your way eventually.

Or so you think.

This, from men who don’t know how to say the TLM.

They would be slightly less hypocritical if they actually knew what they were trying to suppress.  They just know what they’ve been told about it.

And there is always that which whispers in their ears that they should get rid of because of… you know.

QUAERITUR: Is the rise of energy to suppress the TLM and the acceleration even at high levels of trying uncouple, so to speak, the Church’s teaching about sexuality from procreation just a coincidence?

They won’t get their way.  They can always hurt us more, but it won’t, in the end, work.

I don’t believe that the Vetus Ordo can, over time, be suppressed.  That toothpaste is out of the tube now and no amount of oppression will get it back in.

This is a battle over Catholic identity.  Catholic identity, not globalist NGO identity, will win.

Am I wrong?

Think about it this way, Fathers.  The Lord said that the “gates” (Greek “pylai“) of Hell will not “prevail against” (katisxusousin) the Church He would found.   “Gates” don’t attack.  “Gates” are defensive structures that are attacked.  It is the Church that is on the attack against Hell’s gates.  Hell cannot defend itself forever.  Hell defends itself with a powerful hellish onslaught.  A strong offence is a good defense.  But Hell cannot win this one even though it seems that, by attacking constantly, the demons are the attackers.

Even with the Novus Ordo only, properly celebrated, by priests who are devout, brave, focused, with laypeople – though fewer and fewer – trying live their vocations in the state of grace, the Church will, in the end win.

Through no fault of their own, priests and lay people are being sent into battle with only part of the armor and weapons available and they’ve never been fully trained to use them.

Still,  we will, in the end, win the day.  As Samwise said, “But in the end, it’s only a passing thing, this shadow. Even darkness must pass. A new day will come. And when the sun shines it will shine out the clearer.”

If God be for us, who can be against us?

That said, we also want God’s glory to be multiplied.  The loss of a soul to Hell means that much less joy in Heaven.  If we can win the day, eventually, with Novus Ordo, imagine what we might do together also with the Vetus Ordo.   This was Benedict XVI’s vision, not just a Marshall Plan against Hell’s defense-offensives , but a way to even greater glory in Heaven.

I’ll drag my fingers off the keyboard now and let you chew on that.

Fathers, learn the Vetus Ordo.  I’ll help.  And remember another thing Sam said, “It’s the job that’s never started as takes longest to finish!”

Lay people, encourage your priests.  Do everything you can to help them, by prayer and by material support.

And GO TO CONFESSION!

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Mail from priests, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, Sin That Cries To Heaven, Traditionis custodes | Tagged ,
16 Comments