Your Sunday Sermon Notes: Resumed 6th Sunday after Epiphany (33rd Ordinary – N.O.)

Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all. Share the good stuff.

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at the Mass for your Sunday obligation (or, maybe still none), either live or on the internet? Let us know what it was.

What was attendance like?

Tell about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass.  I was getting reports that it is way up.

Any local changes or news?

For those of you who regularly viewed my live-streamed daily Masses – with their fervorini – for over a year, you might drop me a line.  There are developments.

I have some written remarks about the TLM – HERE “Whatever Tribulation is on the Horizon, Be of Good Cheer!”

And there’s this.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
7 Comments

Prayers “Pro defensione ab hostibus… for defense against enemies”

The analogy of the Great Horse of Troy doesn’t quite work (the attackers were hidden from sight).  The ruse de guerre of slipping through enemy lines while wearing enemy uniforms doesn’t quite work (you have to remove the disguise before you shoot).

Perhaps the reimagining of Battlestar Galatica provides a parallel: humanoid machines, Cylons, aren’t shiny robots as they were in the 1970’s. They look like us, now.  The Cylons are indistinguishable from humans and they infiltrated everywhere.   Not only that, if their body is destroyed, they upload to a Cylon hub and they download into another, replica body (of which they have many stored for deployment).  Some of them are “sleepers” who don’t even realize that they are on the enemy’s team until they are activated.   The goal: humiliation and then obliteration of the human race out of revenge for having been created in the first place.

I have in mind the machinations of modernists, Communists, Masons, homosexualists who look like us Catholics, use the same language most of the time, are hard to tease out from the larger picture, but who are bent on the destruction of the Church, from within.  The goal: subvert the Church’s structures into a kind NGO promoting a quasi-religious secularist agenda.

The enemy is behind the lines, in a horse, in friendly uniforms, but they are in plain sight all the time and then don’t remove their uniforms to shoot.  If they are caught, they pop up somewhere else.  They are transferred.  Promoted.

More and more I feel the need to pray against the enemy within, who sit in the seats of power, who occupy the big chairs, both in sees and universities.

These are “enemies”.

Let’s be neither Pollyannas nor, speaking of Troy, Cassandras.   Let us see the situation we are in clearly.

We have enemies.  The enemies are inside the walls.

We must pray for and against these enemies, who are doing the work of Satan.  They are agents of Hell.  Pray.  For them, for their conversion that their souls might not be lost.  Against them, that their evil projects be thwarted and that souls not be lost.

Some time back I had a few posts about the need to pray for enemies, the requirement from Christ Himself to forgive, that we must strive not to hate them, no matter the harm they do to us, others or the Church and the world.   I posted the prayers from the Votive Mass “for enemies”.  One prelate totally freaked out because I posted my hope that God would grant them what they truly needed to bring about a conversion, even if that meant suffering.  He is now on my list to pray for.

The ordained remain ordained, even in Hell.   We’d rather they go to Heaven, no matter if getting there is hard, in earthly terms

We have to get it through out heads that there are truly bad people out there.  They are in grave spiritual danger.  Meanwhile, they plot and do harm.

We must not stand idle and let them hurt themselves and others.

Some of them are fully activated and working to destroy the Church and her influence, as a Church, in the world.  They want to use the Church’s structure but transform her into an NGO, useful for global hegemony.   Others are still “sleepers”.  They are dupes who are playing for the enemies side, but don’t realize that that is what they are doing, rather like – to use another screen analogy, from perhaps the greatest movie made to date – Colonel Nicholson.

Here are the orations Pro defensione ab hostibus… For defense against enemies.

I more and more frequently now I add these when I say Mass, even as I celebrate for the specific intention: “For the Church – against her internal enemies”

COLLECT

Hostium nostrorum, quaesumus, Domine, elide superbiam: et eorum contumaciam dexterae tuae virtute prosterne. Amen.

Shatter to pieces, we beseech Thee O Lord, our enemies’ pride and by the might of Thy hand throw to the ground their insolence.

Contumacia, by the way, can mean not only “insolence”, but “rigidity”.  Ironically, no one is more rigid, in the worst sense, than a committed liberal ideologue.  It is more and more apparent that the present roster of papalatrous ideologues are enemies of the Church, even as they claim to be her earnest defenders.   They way you can tell is their spectacular rigidity, their focus on enforced uniformity, liturgical homogeneity.

SECRET

Huius, Domine, virtute mysterii, et a propriis mundemur occultis, et ab inimicorum liberemur insidiis.

O Lord, by the power of this mystery, may we be cleansed from our own hidden sins and delivered from the snares of our enemies.

POSTCOMMUNION

Protector noster, aspice, Deus, et ab inimicorum nos defende periculis: ut, omni perturbatione submota, liberis tibi mentibus serviamus.

O God, our Protector, look down and defend us from the perils of our enemies: so that, once all trouble is removed, we may with free minds serve Thee.

A reminder… or introduction…

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, Si vis pacem para bellum!, The Coming Storm, The future and our choices |
11 Comments

The cruel spirit animating this golem of a document is rivaled only by its incoherence.

The perspicacious Fr. John Hunwicke has at his ever-satisfying blog a few thoughts about the incoherence of the cruel Traditionis custodes (TC). I reproduce them here but urge you to click over and see what he recently offered about the issue of the “Agatha Christie Indult in England.

The cruel spirit animating this golem of the document TC is rivaled only by its incoherence.  Fr. H points out a few problems with his usual flare.

Because of the blatantly anti-Traditional program – contrary to everything that is Catholic and Christian – in TC, one might excuse prelates and priests who, out of sheer exasperation, throw up their hands and ignore it, as heroes did when in disdain and a sense of what is good, right and just ignored Plessy v. Ferguson.

Hunwicke:

Chaotic “Law”
Just a few examples:

(1) Traditionis custodes lays down (2:3) that the reading at Mass should be “in the vernacular language”. But the Vicar of Rome … a town where, in the past, Catholics from every country in the world have often gone on pilgrimage … has laid down that the readings should be in Italian.

So a priest leading a group of his own folk who do not understand Italian really has got to struggle through two readings in a language he does not himself understand and will not pronounce correctly, for the benefit of a congregation for whom this silly performance will be pure gibberish.

We also have here yet another example of Italophile imperialist arrogance; the mentality which de facto treats Italian, rather than Latin, as the official language of the Catholic Church.

(2) PF laid down that “everything that I have declared in this Apostolic Letter … I order to be observed in all its parts etc.. But the letter of the Vicar for Rome informs his readers that one of the articles in the Motu proprio is “not being activated” in Rome.

Unlike PF, who wanted every word of his decree to be activated immediately, in Rome itself, apparently, this legislation has to await the say-so of the Cardinal Vicar to be “activated”.

(3) The Cardinal Vicar neatly explained that such other books as the old Rituale are now forbidden. But, in his letter to Vincent Nichols, Arthur Roche replied to precisely this question with the words “Traditionis custodes speaks only of the use of the Missale Romanum of 1962 and Eucharistic celebration.”

I am sure that canonical experts must have discussed the situation arising when an apparent ‘law’ is so badly drafted as to be incomprehensible, or impractical, or manifestly contrary to the good of christifideles.

Scratching the surface with style.

Turn the tables on them.

ACTION ITEM! Be a “Custos Traditionis”! Join an association of prayer for the reversal of “Traditionis custodes”.

 

Posted in Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, The Coming Storm, The Drill | Tagged
3 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 330

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
2 Comments

REPOSTED REVIEW: THE ST. GALLEN MAFIA – Exposing the Secret Reformist Group Within the Church by Julia Meloni.

UPDATE 12 Nov:

More people should read this.  Soon.


Originally Published on: Oct 30, 2021

I’m reading

THE ST. GALLEN MAFIA – Exposing the Secret Reformist Group Within the Church by Julia Meloni.

US HERE – UK HERE

It is published by TAN Books.

In a nutshell, a group of cardinals were meeting already in the 90’s with the purpose of undermining Joseph Card. Ratzinger and, later, Benedict XVI, while raising up a contrast Pope in the figure of Card. Martini and, later, Card. Bergoglio.

The group was active for while and then went dormant, to be revived at the time of the 2013 conclave that elected Bergoglio.

Meloni’s book connects a lot of data points, much as we do when we complete a jigsaw puzzle, looking for corners and straight edges, sorting for colors and filling in blanks.

She is quite thorough.

One section that caught my close attention was a later chapter on the patience of the machinations and the individuals, wherein there popped in an important name: Yves Congar, an powerful influence at the Second Vatican Council and part of the Concilium group.

Why does that name trigger me? Because when Francis opened the recent Synod (“walking together) about Synods (“walking together”) he quoted Congar, saying:

“We must not make another Church,we must make a different Church”(Vera e falsa riforma nella Chiesa,Milan 1994, 193). And that’s the challenge. For a “different Church”, open to the newness that God wants to suggest to her, let us invoke the Spirit with greater strength and frequency and humbly listen to him, walking together, as he, creator of communion and mission, desires, that is, with docility and courage.

As Meloni points out, Congar “was obsessed by time”.

Congar wanted a patient transformation of the Church without rushing, causing breaks or schisms, moving in stages, patiently waiting through delays.

For his part, Francis has several guiding principles that he laid out in Evangelii gaudium which he in turn took from an Argentinian caudillo.  One of those principles was “time is greater than space”.   It sounds vacuous, but it in essence means, “patience overcomes resistence”.

In this section, Meloni connects the influence of Card. Martini with the projects of Francis.  They line up.

I am reminded of the patience that certain groups such as Masons, Communists, and Homosexualists had over decades of slow but steady infiltration of the Church at many levels, keeping relatively quite until the “tipping point” was finally attained.  We are seeing the results now being played out before our horrified eyes.

I haven’t seen lib reactions to this book yet, but surely they will devolve into the usual sniffery about “conspiracy theorists”, as if that will automatically deny the veracity of the content.   The problem is that facts are stubborn.  Meloni provides citations.

This is a hard book to read, much as an autopsy is hard to watch.  They are simultaneously fascinating and repulsive.

UPDATE:

As far as lib reactions are concerned, I tried something.  At the beginning of the book, Meloni describes Card. Martini watching Card. Ratzinger preach the famous homily before the conclave, how for a moment Martini glared at Ratzinger.  She provided the link to the video with the time point.

The video is now “unavailable”.

At least at that link.

It might be a good idea for people to gather onto their own hard disks some of the online references for future consultation.

BTW… the obvious companion to Meloni’s book is The Dictator Pope (revised and updated)(US HERE – UK HERE)highly critical of Pope Francis and those around him, originally was published under the pen name of “Marcantonio Colonna”.

UPDATE

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in Jesuits, Liberals, Pò sì jiù, REVIEWS | Tagged ,
23 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 329

Photo by The Great Roman™

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
4 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 328

OPPORTUNITY
10% off with code: FATHERZ10
They have a Thanksgiving Assortment now.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
1 Comment

Ralph Martin’s surprising Vladimir Putin video

You have perhaps read my theory that, as the demographic sink-hole continues to gobble up Catholic who are falling away.   I believe that, eventually, there will be left three groups, traditionalists (no matter what the cruel hierarchy tries to do to them), charismatics, and converts from evangelical Protestantism.  These groups will have to work and fit together, because they will be all that’s left.  There will be frictions, but it will happen.

Along these lines, I pay good attention Ralph Martin, who for many years has been aligned with the charismatic trend.

This video was thought provoking in a particular way.

Posted in Pò sì jiù, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
31 Comments

ASK FATHER: Invalid marriage because one was secretly “gay”

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

My husband and I (both Roman Catholic) are separated. We separated in July after I learned he is secretly gay and has been meeting men for a decade, including before and throughout the entire time we were dating, engaged, and married.

I’ve already spoken to my parish priest about an annulment and we are in the divorce process. We have a toddler daughter. My husband does not want the marriage to dissolve.

My priest says it is a clear case of invalidity. But I would just like (hopefully) a word of encouragement that, on it’s face, you think those are reasonable grounds for me to seek a divorce and annulment.

While we do not have his side of the story, this doesn’t seem all that difficult a case.

Homosexuality, especially when concealed, would likely be a solid ground for exploring the invalidity of consent, because the person who now identifies as “gay” was incapable of assuming the obligations of marriage (can. 1095, 3), or because he deceived the person into marriage by concealing his tendencies (can. 1098) or possibly from error qualitatis personae (can. 1097).

If he had been seeing others prior to and after consent, there might also be the possibility of simulation against the good of fidelity (can. 1101) on his part.

UPDATE:

I was in touch with a canonist with lots of tribunal experience who advised me that, tribunals in these USA generally don’t accept a case until it is clear there is no hope of reconciliation between the parties.   The best (though saddest) proof of that is a final divorce judgment.   Some tribunals also have a waiting period after a divorce is final, like asking the Petitioner to wait a year, etc.

Furthermore, when someone alleges that his or her marriage is null, the burden of proof is on the person making the allegation.

It’s not enough to just say, “I learned he was secretly gay.”

Proof and evidence would be need of his long-term, deep-seated same-sex attraction.

The lady should submit all relevant evidence to the tribunal and let them decide the grounds.

“Gay” in itself may not be grounds for nullity.

UPDATE:

It should be added that people who are homosexual can validly contract marriage.  What matters is the state of the persons at the time of the marriage, the manifest exchange of vows of the baptized who are free, not hindered in any way, to marry.

Above, note the mention of “proofs”.   Until there are proofs, the marriage is deemed to be valid.

Moreover, there are various reasons to remain together, provided that fidelity and exclusivity can be assured, keeping in mind that two men who do things to each other is not so much adultery as mutual abuse.  The care of children, the goal of helping each other get to heaven… these goods are part and parcel of what was vowed at the time of the marriage and cannot be set aside without grave reasons (e.g., danger of physical violence, psychological harm to children, etc.)

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Canon Law, One Man & One Woman, Sin That Cries To Heaven | Tagged , , , ,
9 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 327

If you haven’t tried it yet, you have no idea how good this beer is with sausage, cheese, etc.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
4 Comments