5 May: “O God, who deigned to choose blessed Pius to be Pontifex Maximus in order to smash the enemies of Thy Church to tiny bits” – UPDATED

5 May: "O God, who deigned to choose blessed Pius to be Pontifex Maximus in order to smash the enemies of Thy Church to tiny bits" - UPDATED

In the traditional Roman calendar, used with the 1962 Missale Romanum, the Vetus Ordo, today is the feast of St. Pope Pius V (+1572).

I made a PODCAzT about him some years ago, and about his famous document Quo primum.

084 09-04-30 St. Pius V and Quo primum

Here is a list of some of the accomplishments of St. Pius, who reigned for only a bit more than 6 years, and in tumultuous times.

1) began his pontificate by giving large alms to the poor (he did not just talk about them)
2) as Pope, continued the life of penance and virtue he had lived as a mendicant friar
3) made two meditations during the day ON BENDED KNEES in the presence of the Bl. Sacrament
4) visited hospitals and sat by the bedside of the sick
5) washed the feet of the (non-Muslim) poor and embraced the lepers
6) always opposed Protestantism and the Turks (Islam)
7) excommunicated Elizabeth I
8) instituted the Feast of the Holy Rosary
9) reformed the curia and the Church, leaving, after he died, “the memory of a rare virtue and an unfailing and inflexible integrity”
10) Closed the Council of Trent
11) Issued the Missale Romanum
12) Arranged the Holy League that fought at Lepanto
13) Instituted the Feast of Our Lady of Victory
14) Declared St. Thomas Aquinas Doctor of the Church
15) Reformed the Roman clergy
16) Reconstructed the Roman water supply
17) Condemned the teachings of Michael Baius
18) Reformed the Roman Breviary
19) Issued the Roman Catechism
20) Tried 8 French Bishops for heresy

St. John Henry Newman wrote:

“St. Pius V was stern and severe, as far as a heart burning and melted with divine love could be so … Yet such energy and vigour as his were necessary for the times. He was a soldier of Christ in a time of insurrection and rebellion, when in a spiritual sense, martial law was proclaimed.”

Let’s drill into the Collect for this saint:

Deus, qui, ad conterendos Ecclesiae tuae hostes et ad divinum cultum reparandum, beatum Pium Pontificem maximum eligere dignatus es: fac nos ipsius defendi praesidiis et ita tuis inhaerere obsequiis; ut, omnium hostium superatis insidiis, perpetua pace laetemur.

Contero is, “to grind, bruise, pound, to crumble, separate into small pieces”.  That word alone is a hint that this is a great prayer.  Obsequium, in the plural here, is a little tricky to get into English just right.  First, it has to do with God: it’s with tuis.  It has to do with how God is indulgent, toward us.  I want to say “cleave to your indulgences”, but that sounds like the use of the indulgences the Church grants from the treasury of the merits of Christ and the saints.  So, we have to put it another way.

Slavishly Literal Attempt:

O God, who deigned to choose blessed Pius to be Pontifex Maximus in order to smash the enemies of Your Church to bits and to renew the divine worship, cause us to be defended by his protections and to cleave with obedience to what You will in such way that, once the plots of all our enemies are overcome, we may rejoice in perpetual peace.

This is martial and bold.  This is exactly the attitude we need more of in the Church right now!

We are in a constant state of war with the world, flesh and the Devil.  And the Devil uses human agents (his “catch-farts”) in his deadly design.  The Church is best from within and from without, by enemies internal and external.

What do you think Pius would say today about the state of the Church?  The teachings of the Council he closed, Trent, are nearly abandoned in some parts, our sacred worship is in shambles, there is heresy and indifference, the Church’s external enemies, such as Communists and homosexualists, are rising with little or no guidance or outcry.

Sometimes, friends, we have to have the fight.  Then we can have the peace.

Note especially the point about “renewal of worship”.  I contend that nothing will change for the better in the Church until we undertake a serious revitalization of our sacred liturgical worship of God.   Alas, those in charge seem particularly set against that.  Revealing.

St. Pius V, pray for us.

And while we are at it…

Sts. Nunilo and Alodia, pray for us.
St. Lawrence of Brindisi, pray for us.
St. Peter Damian, pray for us.

UPDATE

From the great Fr. Hunwicke:

S Pius V and the liars

Today, his Feast Day, is the 450th anniversary of the Heavenly Birthday of Papa Ghislieri, Saint Pius V, Bishop of Rome.

Two BIG UNTRUTHS in particular are told about him, poor fellow.

Lie Number 1: he issued a radically revised version of the Roman Missal, just as S Paul VI was to do after Vatican II.

Fact: S Pius’s edition of the Missal was so light a revision that it was still possible, after its promulgation, to continue to use your old Missal.

Lie Number 2: although permitting some exceptions, S Pius ordered his edition to be used by everybody.

Fact: he ORDERED all rites older than 200 years to be kept in use. (He only permitted churches with 200-year-old-or-more rites to change over to his own new edition if the Diocesan Bishop and the unanimous chapter agreed).

I hope that is clear enough. But … so many people … Popes … Cardinals … Bishops  … have such trouble with all this … so … here’s another simple way of explaining the difference between S Pius V and Pope Francis:

(a) Pope Pius V ORDERED Rites older than 200 years to be RETAINED;

(b) Pope Francis is TRYING TO EXTERMINATE a Rite which is centuries more than 500 years old.

If people you are talking to really are so thick that they can’t understand the difference when you’ve tried both these ways of explaining things, give up.

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Saints: Stories & Symbols, SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
3 Comments

St. Monica, her incipient alcoholism, the intervention that saved her, some Latin

St. Monica, her incipient alcoholism, the intervention that saved her, some Latin

From Serge Lancel’s Augustine, the best biography I know of the great Bishop of Hippo (p. 8 ff – emphases mine):

Before devoting himself entirely to Mother Church, as he approached the age of forty, Augustine had had a concubine for about fifteen years, of whom he had been very fond and who had given him a son; then, at the same time as a fleeting engagement, a second short-lived liaison.  But only one woman really counted in his life, and that was his natural mother, Monica.

As we may guess from reading a few pages of Book IX.8 of the Confessions, Patricius – Augustine’s father – had taken a wife in Thagaste from a milieu close to his own.  He had married Monica, as his would describe it in a phrase borrowed from Virgil, “in the fullness of her nubility”, which means that he had not married a child, a practice that was in any case more rare then in Africa that in Rome itself.  The couple had three children, in what order we do not know: a girl, who remains anonymous to us, but who, once widowed, would later become the superior of a community of nuns, and two boys, Augustine and Navigius, whom we shall find with his brother in Italy, at Cassiciacum, then at Ostia at their dying mother’s bedside.  …

So Monica had been born into a Christian family and was, as we would say today, a practicing believer.  The religious practices of Christians at that time, in North Africa, sometimes included aspects that would be surprising to us, such as the custom of taking offerings of food to the tombs of martyrs, for agapes that only too often degenerated into orgies; an obvious survival of the pagan festival of the Parentalia.  Of course, Monica did not indulge in those excesses.  If the baskets she brought to the cemetery contained, besides gruel and bread, a pitcher of unadulterated wine, when the time came to share libations with other faithful, she herself would take only a tiny amount, diluted with water, sipped from a goblet in front of every tomb visited.  Was this sobriety a memory of some experience in her early youth?  Augustine tells this story which he says he heard from the lady herself.  Raised in temperance by an old serving-woman who enjoyed the complete trust of Monica’s parents, she had fallen into a bad habit.  Well-behaved girl that she was, she was sent to the cellar to fetch wine from the cask, but before using the goblet she had brought to fill the carafe she would just wet her lips with the wine, not because she liked it, says Augustine, but out of childish mischief.  But gradually she had acquired a taste for it, to the point where she was drinking entire goblets of it with great gusto.  Fortunately she had cured herself of this incipient liking for drink in a burst of pride: the maidservant who accompanied her to the cellar, having fallen out one day with her young mistress insultingly called he a “little wine bibber”.  Stung to the quick, Monica had immediately stopped her habit.

Think now about the spiritual works of mercy: admonish the sinner.  Consider how that servant affected WESTERN CIVILIZATION because of what she did for the future mother of St. Augustine, arguably one of the most influential figures in history.

St. Monica, her incipient alcoholism, the intervention that saved her, some Latin

CLICK

Here’s the Latin from conf 9.8.18.  A few interesting words in bold:

8. 18. Et subrepserat tamen, sicut mihi filio famula tua narrabat, subrepserat ei vinulentia. [“an inclination for getting drunk on wine slithered into her”] Nam cum de more tamquam puella sobria iuberetur a parentibus de cupa vinum depromere, submisso poculo, qua desuper patet, priusquam in lagunculam funderet merum, [wine uncut with water – in the ancient world wine was always cut and it drinking merum was a sign of low manners, etc, as Cicero accused Mark Antony] primoribus labris sorbebat exiguum, quia non poterat amplius sensu recusante. Non enim ulla temulenta [archaic word for wine] cupidine faciebat hoc, sed quibusdam superfluentibus aetatis excessibus, qui ludicris motibus ebulliunt et in puerilibus animis maiorum pondere premi solent. Itaque ad illud modicum quotidiana modica addendo; quoniam qui modica spernit, paulatim decidit; in eam consuetudinem lapsa erat, ut prope iam plenos mero caliculos inhianter hauriret. [with a gaping mouth she quaffed whole cups of uncut wine] Ubi tunc sagax anus [wise old woman] et vehemens illa prohibitio? Numquid valebat aliquid adversus latentem morbum, nisi tua medicina, Domine, vigilaret super nos? Absente patre et matre et nutritoribus tu praesens, qui creasti, qui vocas, qui etiam per praepositos homines boni aliquid agis ad animarum salutem. Quid tunc egisti, Deus meus? Unde curasti? Unde sanasti? Nonne protulisti durum et acutum ex altera anima convicium tamquam medicinale ferrum [reproach like a cautering iron] ex occultis provisionibus tuis et uno ictu putredinem illam praecidisti? Ancilla enim, cum qua solebat accedere ad cupam, litigans cum domina minore, ut fit, sola cum sola, obiecit hoc crimen amarissima insultatione vocans meribibulam. [The old servant woman threw this crime (at Monica) with the bitterest reproach calling her a drunk (“wine-swiller”).] Quo illa stimulo percussa respexit foeditatem suam confestimque damnavit atque exuit. Sicut amici adulantes pervertunt, sic inimici litigantes plerumque corrigunt. Nec tu quod per eos agis, sed quod ipsi voluerunt, retribuis eis. Illa enim irata exagitare appetivit minorem dominam, non sanare, et ideo clanculo, aut quia ita eas invenerat locus et tempus litis, aut ne forte et ipsa periclitaretur, quod tam sero prodidisset. At tu, Domine, rector caelitum et terrenorum, ad usus tuos contorquens profunda torrentis, fluxum saeculorum ordinans turbulentum, etiam de alterius animae insania sanasti alteram, ne quisquam, cum hoc advertit, potentiae suae tribuat, si verbo eius alius corrigatur, quem vult corrigi.

In the online Pusey translation… a little dated:

And yet (as Thy handmaid told me her son) there had crept upon her a love of wine. For when (as the manner was) she, as though a sober maiden, was bidden by her parents to draw wine out of the hogshed, holding the vessel under the opening, before she poured the wine into the flagon, she sipped a little with the tip of her lips; for more her instinctive feelings refused. For this she did, not out of any desire of drink, but out of the exuberance of youth, whereby it boils over in mirthful freaks, which in youthful spirits are wont to be kept under by the gravity of their elders. And thus by adding to that little, daily littles (for whoso despiseth little things shall fall by little and little), she had fallen into such a habit as greedily to drink off her little cup brim-full almost of wine. Where was then that discreet old woman, and that her earnest countermanding? Would aught avail against a secret disease, if Thy healing hand, O Lord, watched not over us? Father, mother, and governors absent, Thou present, who createdst, who callest, who also by those set over us, workest something towards the salvation of our souls, what didst Thou then, O my God? how didst Thou cure her? how heal her? didst Thou not out of another soul bring forth a hard and a sharp taunt, like a lancet out of Thy secret store, and with one touch remove all that foul stuff? For a maid-servant with whom she used to go to the cellar, falling to words (as it happens) with her little mistress, when alone with her, taunted her with this fault, with most bitter insult, calling her wine-bibber. With which taunt she, stung to the quick, saw the foulness of her fault, and instantly condemned and forsook it. As flattering friends pervert, so reproachful enemies mostly correct. Yet not what by them Thou doest, but what themselves purposed, dost Thou repay them. For she in her anger sought to vex her young mistress, not to amend her; and did it in private, either for that the time and place of the quarrel so found them; or lest herself also should have anger, for discovering it thus late. But Thou, Lord, Governor of all in heaven and earth, who turnest to Thy purposes the deepest currents, and the ruled turbulence of the tide of times, didst by the very unhealthiness of one soul heal another; lest any, when he observes this, should ascribe it to his own power, even when another, whom he wished to be reformed, is reformed through words of his.

Posted in Patristiblogging, Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged , ,
2 Comments

4 May – St. Monica: Intercessor for children who who have fallen away from the Faith

In the older, traditional Roman calendar today is the feast of the mother of St. Augustine, St. Monnica, widow.  She died in Ostia (Rome’s port) in 387, when she and her family were heading back to North Africa after Augustine’s conversion and baptism by St. Ambrose.  She caught a fever during a blockade of the port.

Yes, you can spell her name “Monnica”, with two n’s which is consistent with her Punic origins.

I have a first-class relic of this marvelous woman as well as one of her son, Augustine and also of Ambrose.

20130504-094844.jpg

In the post-Conciliar calendar, her feast was moved to be next to that of her son.

As she lay dying in Ostia near Rome, Monnica told Augustine (conf. 9):

“Lay this body anywhere, let not the care for it trouble you at all. This only I ask, that you will remember me at the Lord’s altar, wherever you be.”

She was buried there in Ostia. Her body was later moved to the Church of St. Augustine in Rome across the street from where I lived for many years.

4 May - St. Monica: Intercessor for children who who have fallen away from the Faith4 May - St. Monica: Intercessor for children who who have fallen away from the Faith

4 May - St. Monica: Intercessor for children who who have fallen away from the Faith

May she pray for us, for widows and for parents of children who have drifted from the Church.

Be sure to pray for the departed. Pray for them! Don’t just remember them. Don’t just think well of them. Don’t just, as the case may be, resent or be angry at them.

Pray for them!

Prayer for the dead is a spiritual work of mercy.

4 May - St. Monica: Intercessor for children who who have fallen away from the Faith

Also, I’ll remind you of a fine book on Augustine:

4 May - St. Monica: Intercessor for children who who have fallen away from the Faith

REVIEW: The book on Augustine which Pope Benedict would have wanted to write.

Also, if you want a really interesting book on the Doctor of Grace, check out Serge Lancel‘s volume.

UK HERE

4 May - St. Monica: Intercessor for children who who have fallen away from the Faith

BTW… read about how Monica’s original Latin epitaph inscription was found in Ostia by some kids who wanted to play basketball.  HERE

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged ,
2 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 490, etc.

Daily Rome Shot 490, etc.

Photo by The Great Roman™

Daily Rome Shot 490, etc.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
Leave a comment

SCOTUS Draft Opinion overturns Roe v Wade. In the Church there is something that must be overturned.

I have a lot of mail today about the leaked 1st Draft of the SCOTUS’ majority “Opinion of the Court signed by Justice Alito.   It is a fine demolition of Roe v. Wade, an exposition of the obvious and well known, well expressed.

The case in question is, for shorthand, called: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. I supposed that will become “Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health” or simply “Dobbs“.

You should read the DRAFT Opinion – HERE

A quote:

‘We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled. The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely—the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. That provision has been held to guarantee some rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution, but any such right must be “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition” and “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.” Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U. S. 702, 721 (1997) (internal quotation marks omitted)

The right to abortion docs not fall within this category.

There it is.  And…

Stare decisis, the doctrine on which Casey’s controlling opinion was based, does not compel unending adherence to Roe’s abuse of judicial authority. Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Its reasoning was exceptionally weak, and the decision has had damaging consequences. And far from bringing about a national settlement of the abortion issue, Roe and Casey have enflamed debate and deepened division.

It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of
abortion to the people’s elected representatives.

Clear.

And this…

‘Some of our most important constitutional decisions have overruled prior precedents. We mention three. In Brown. v. Board of Education, the Court repudiated the “separate but equal” doctrine, which had allowed States to maintain racially segregated schools and other facilities. 347 U.S. 483, 488 (1954). In so doing, the Court overruled the infamous decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U. S. 537 (1896), along with six other Supreme Court precedents that had applied the separate-but-equal rule. …

Plessy v. Ferguson, that abomination upholding racial segregation, was effectively overturned by Brown v. Board.

Sometimes lawmakers simply get things wrong, for whatever reason or ideology they are shackled by.  Shouting “Stare decisis!” isn’t good enough in some cases.  

Traditionis custodes, the Plessy of the Francis Legacy, should be overturned, quam primum

In the Church there is no juridical mechanism of recourse by which plaintiffs can make a case again Traditionis.  However, that doesn’t mean that TC can’t be tried in the court of opinion, and opinion expressed to authority.  As a matter of fact, the faithful are urged in Canon Law to do so

Can. 212 §1. Conscious of their own responsibility, the Christian faithful are bound to follow with Christian obedience those things which the sacred pastors, inasmuch as they represent Christ, declare as teachers of the faith or establish as rulers of the Church.

§2. The Christian faithful are free to make known to the pastors of the Church their needs, especially spiritual ones, and their desires.

§3. According to the knowledge, competence, and prestige which they possess, they have the right and even at times the duty to manifest to the sacred pastors their opinion on matters which pertain to the good of the Church and to make their opinion known to the rest of the Christian faithful, without prejudice to the integrity of faith and morals, with reverence toward their pastors, and attentive to common advantage and the dignity of persons.

TC is a miscarriage of justice and charity and it should be reversed.

Consider the Custos Traditionis initiative.

HERE

I propose…

… an informal association of prayer and penance dedicated to two petitions offered to the Blessed Virgin Mary, which are

  • the softening of hearts of those interpreting Traditionis custodes (bishops, Roman officials);
  • the overturning of, or reversal of, or major amendment of Traditionis custodes.

I ask you to join with others, making an informal but serious pledge to do two things for the two intentions, above.

YOUR COMMITTMENT…

  • recite the beautiful and powerful Memorare prayer DAILY;
  • make an act of physical or material penance for the two intentions ONCE A WEEK.

Back to Dobbs for a moment.

Swap out some term in this additional excerpt from The Draft Opinion:

The nature of the Court’s error. An erroneous interpretation of the Constitution is always important, but some are ‘more damaging than others. ‘The infamous decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, supra, was one such decision. …

For reasons already explained, Roe‘s constitutional analysis was far outside the bounds of any reasonable interpretation of the various constitutional provisions to which it vaguely pointed.

Roe was on a collision course with the Constitution from the day it was decided, and Casey perpetuated its errors, and the errors do not concern some arcane corner of the law of little importance to the American people. Rather, wielding nothing but “raw judicial power,” Roe, 410 U. S., at 222 (White, J., dissenting), the Court usurped the power to address a question of profound moral and social importance that the Constitution unequivocally leaves for the people.

When we get something wrong, it is folly simply to blunder along on the same course.  When the blunder affects others, the rational, just, charitable thing to do is to retrace steps back to the blunder and make a correction.

As the Draft Opinion states:

The Court has no authority to decree that an erroneous precedent is permanently exempt from evaluation under traditional stare decisis principles. A precedent of this Court is subject to the usual principles of stare decisis under which adherence to precedent is the norm but not an inexorable command. If the rule were otherwise, erroneous decisions like Plessy and Lochner [concerning employee rights] would still be the law. That is not how stare decisis operates.

 

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged , , , , ,
22 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 489, etc.

I’ve been really busy in the last few days because of travel and because of more travel coming up.  My “Rome Trip” is upon me, preceded by a tour with a pro-life group.  That all begins next Monday.  Hence, fewer posts with a lot of text.  Please be patient with me.

Daily Rome Shot 489, etc.

The wonderful nuns of Gower Abbey, the Benedictines of Mary, Queen of Apostles, have a new disc and digital download:

Tenebrae at Ephesus

Daily Rome Shot 489, etc.

US HERE – UK HERE

These are the RESPONSORIES of Tenebrae for all three days of the Triduum.  They are, arguably, the most beautiful chants of the entire liturgical year.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
Leave a comment

Daily Rome Shot 488, etc.

Daily Rome Shot 488, etc.

Photo by The Great Roman™

3:16 isn’t just in John.Daily Rome Shot 488, etc.Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.

US HERE – UK HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
Leave a comment

Brace for vicious cruelty in Washington, DC.

UPDATE:

I received this and, in fairness, it ought to be shared:

Dear Fr. Zuhlsdorf,

Your posting about our parish slightly mischaracterizes what was said at mass today about Cardinal Gregory’s thoughts about the Extraordinary Form Mass at our parish.  If you review the Facebook video of this morning’s EF Mass (2nd Sunday after Easter) you’ll see that what was announced was this: The Cardinal will make a determination after the synod meetings in May.  I asked our people to pray for the good of the parish and reminded them that they always have the right to communicate with their spiritual father.  I did NOT suggest that he had made up his mind, nor did I suggest he’d speak on the matter in May.  I can understand that someone might easily nuance the accurate statement into what they told you, but I just want to be clear for the good of my parishioners.  I hope you’ll consider revising your post.

Father Vincent J. De Rosa
Pastor
St. Mary Mother of God

It may be that one of you readers who know about the “Facebook video of this morning’s EF Mass” – he didn’t provide a link or time in the video, and I am not going to look for it – might be able to hunt this up.


From a reader…

It was announced at Mass this morning that Cardinal Gregory will issue statement on TC this month and it will not be a happy one. Pray for us in the Archdiocese of Washington, DC!

One of my connected friends in the DC area told me:

The word is that HE, Cardinal Gregory will confine the celebration of the 1962 missal to the JP II Center, a non-parochial chapel.  It will be devastating to St. Mary’s.  Truly the smoke of Satan….

Yes, truly cruel.  It will harm a lot of people at Old St. Mary’s.

I really hope that something miraculous happens “between the bridge and the water”, between the pre-announcement and the announcement, a massive change of heart event, a 180° change of attitude about the people who will be so marginalized and harmed.

All the more reason to consider the Custos Traditionis initiative.

HERE

I propose…

… an informal association of prayer and penance dedicated to two petitions offered to the Blessed Virgin Mary, which are

  • the softening of hearts of those interpreting Traditionis custodes (bishops, Roman Congregation officials);
  • the overturning of, or reversal of, or major amendment of Traditionis custodes.

I ask you to join with others, making an informal but serious pledge to do two things for the two intentions, above.

YOUR COMMITTMENT…

  • recite the beautiful and powerful Memorare prayer DAILY;
  • make an act of physical or material penance for the two intentions ONCE A WEEK.

Aside: I had made some shirts for promoting this with the Memorare in several languages on the back and, on the front, Custos Traditionis – ASK ME

I happened to be wearing that shirt at the grocery the other day and the woman at the checkout asked.  As it turns out she was Catholic and she was very interested to learn that a Sunday Traditional Latin Mass was not far away.  She said she would go.

It isn’t the first time the shirt has presented a change for me to tell someone about the TLM.   The conversation has also sometimes gotten around to other aspects of the Church’s life, too.

Will you be a "Custos Traditionis" and commit to a DAILY 'Memorare' and WEEKLY penance?

View Results

Loading ...
Posted in Cri de Coeur, Liberals, Our Catholic Identity, Pò sì jiù, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, The Coming Storm | Tagged , ,
21 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 487, etc.

Daily Rome Shot 487, etc.

Photo by The Great Roman™

Daily Rome Shot 487, etc.

OPPORTUNITY
10% off with code:
FATHERZ10

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged ,
Leave a comment

One bishop, two dioceses.

At Catholic Culture Phil Lawler has views about the recent appointment of one bishop to oversee two distinct dioceses.

Yesterday’s news included the curious report that in two different cases—one in Ireland, one in Wales—Pope Francis had appointed one bishop to head two separate dioceses. In each case, we are told, the dioceses will remain distinct and autonomous. Over at The Pillar, Ed Condon wonders whether this could be the beginning of a trend, “in the face of declining numbers of clergy and Mass-going Catholics.”

We have already seen several rounds of diocesan “restructuring” campaigns, in which parishes are merged into pastoral cooperatives, with one pastor responsible for two or more churches. The arrangement is far from ideal: the priest is forced to jump from one town to another, and parishioners have to keep track of his movements if they want to know where Mass will be celebrated on a given day. But it beats never having Mass celebrated in the local parish. A part-time priest is better than no priest at all.

At least in theory, the cooperatives allow for parish churches to remain open despite the shortage of both priests and parishioners.

[…]

There’s more.  He also talks about the issue of spiritual fatherhood.  Can a bishop be a spiritual father to more than one diocese?  Presbyterate?

This doesn’t seem to be of interest to bishops today, from what I hear and have experienced, so maybe that wasn’t part of the calculation.

In the ancient church bishops didn’t move from place to place because they were espoused to their diocese.  Leaving and going to another place was like adultery.  But two, dioceses?  If memory serves, in the medieval and renaissance period, there were some bishops with more than one diocese.  However, I suspect that some of them may not have been much into “spiritual fatherhood”.

Hey, Amoris footnote 351!   As long as we accompany them, perhaps bishops can have more than one diocese!

Administration!  That’s the ticket!   Enough of this old fashioned talk about “fatherhood”.  What is that, anyway?

Seriously, this is an issue.  With Vatican II there and Christus Dominus there has been a real shift in the understanding of who and what a bishop is.  This is something that needs deeper thought.

BTW… this two diocese thing “in persona episcopi“, can be a prelude to amalgamation of the dioceses, union aeque principaliter.   This was done historically in these USA with Baltimore and Washington.

Some points.

Lawler also brings up the fact that, with the ever declining number of available priests, by merging parishes at least those places remain unsold and open for Mass once in a while, which is better than never.   Hence, when the great springtime finally arrives and seminaries overflow, those places can be resuscitated and separated again.

Of course if bishops stopped persecuting, marginalizing and ignoring traditional Catholics, and instead embraced Tradition and all that it entails, they would soon have more seminarians than they knew what to do with.  After a few years of struggles with the thoroughly indoctrinated lib immanentist, modernist cadres in the few surviving parishes, things would turn around.  Where it’s tried, it works.  But, alas, most bishops, modernist priests too, would rather have a smoking crater sown with salt than a happy, vibrant parish with all the traditional liturgy and preaching and programs.

This is part and parcel with something else that has come to me through the grape vine.  I’ve been hearing that, more often now than before, priests are declining to be made bishops.  In general, when the Holy See called men to be bishops, they accepted even after some hesitation or misgivings.  Real head pressure could be applied to get that, “yes”.  However, I hear that some men are simply saying “no” and not budging.

Priest shortage and priests have to have Multiple parishes.  Shortage of a certain type of candidate for the episcopacy….

 

Posted in Pò sì jiù, Priests and Priesthood, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged ,
14 Comments