ASK FATHER: Will happiness in heaven be incomplete if our loved ones aren’t there too?

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

I always hear that when we die and go to heaven we will see our loved ones again. That we will be together again. But how can that be? How can It be if someone you love doesn’t love you the same? If someone gets married, falls in love and then their spouse dies and they remarry then what happens? They can’t all reunite. It makes me sad to think That I will not reunite with my mom, et al.

It is a pious, hope-filled thought, isn’t it?  Such a proposition softens the reality that a) not all get to heaven and that b) passing through that door of death is scary.  It is a warming comfort for us when we consider what Augustine called “our daily winter”… the chilling fear of death.

Our happiness in heaven will reside in our purified love of God and the Beatific Vision.  We will know that all is exactly as it ought to be according to God’s will.  In that state we will lack nothing which we need to be happy.  That means that we will be also perfectly content with the eternal fate of those whom we loved in life but who didn’t make it.   We will be content because where they are is where they ought to be.

Our happiness will not be decreased by the lack of a certain person.  However, it will be increased, as will everyone’s, by the presence of that person, sharing in glorifying God.

God doesn’t need for us creatures to glorify Him, and yet the increase in love, joy and His ultimate glorification by free creatures in His image and likeness is the final end of creation.

When the Enemy manages to get a soul away from God and that soul winds up irrevocably in Hell, he can crow, “That’s one more You can’t have!”   God’s glory isn’t diminished by such a loss, but our collective giving of glory to God is that much less bright.

This should be a stimulus to us in this life to do what we can to get our loved ones to heaven!

You spouses… you must love God more than each other, so that you can love each other properly.   Your main job in life is to help your spouse to heaven.  Your responsibility to your children is to given them the formation they need to increase maximally the probability that they will choose to live a holy life of faith.  You have friends and others in your life whom you influence.

Some say “Don’t proselytize!”

Uh huh.  Everyone has a part to play in The Great Commission.

Remember that people in this life are attracted more to joy than to gloom, solid well reasoned answers than vague and uncertain.

And never underestimate the power of an invitation.

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Four Last Things | Tagged
13 Comments

WDTPRS – 19th Ordinary Sunday: God will come to us not as “stranger God”, but as Father God!

The Collect for the 19th Sunday of Ordinary Time was not in previous editions Missale Romanum before the 1970 Novus Ordo. It has roots in the 9th century Sacramentary of Bergamo and thus is ancient text.   Well… sort of.

Note that for the 2002 Missale Romanum there was a variation from the 1970MR.  In the 2002MR the ablative absolute clause “docente Spiritu Sancto” was inserted.

Omnipotens sempiterne Deus,
quem [docente Spiritu Sancto –
not in the 1970MR]
paterno nomine invocare praesumimus,
perfice in cordibus nostris spiritum adoptionis filiorum,
ut promissam hereditatem ingredi mereamur
.

Can’t stop tinkering, I guess.

Paternus, a, um is an adjective, “fatherly”. Literally, a paternum nomen would be “Fatherly name”. In English we need to break that down a little, just as we do with the Latin for “Sunday”: dies dominica or “lordly Day” in place of what we say “the day of the Lord”. In English a paternum nomen is “the name of Father”. Latin uses adjectives and adverbs for more purposes than we do. Our trusted old friend Lewis & Short Dictionary informs us that invoco means “to call upon, invoke” especially as a witness or as aid. So, there is an element of urgency and humility in the word. Praesumo gives us the English word and concept of “presumption”. At its root it means, “to take before, take first or beforehand.” The adverb and adjective prae, the prefix element of prae-sumo, is “before, in front of, in advance of”. In a less physical sense it can mean “anticipate”, in the sense of “to imagine or picture to one’s self beforehand” or in a moral nuance “to presume, take for granted”. It is even, more interestingly, “to undertake, venture, dare” together with “to trust, be confident”.

LITERAL WDTPRS ATTEMPT:

Almighty eternal God,
whom, [the Holy Spirit teaching,
added in the 2002MR]
we presume to invoke by the name of Father,
perfect in our hearts the spirit of the adoption of children,
so that we may merit to enter into the inheritance promised
.

Notice that I translate filii as “children” rather than as just “sons”, according to the literal meaning. Latin masculine plurals, depending on the context, can also include females even though the form of the word is masculine.

OBSOLETE ICEL (1973):

Almighty and ever-living God,
you Spirit made us your children,
confident to call you Father.
Increase your Spirit within us
and bring us to our promised inheritance
.

Take careful note that the language of adoption has been expunged. Does this change the impact of the prayer? Does it present a different view of the Christian life than that presented in the Latin Collect?

An important element of our Collect comes from Paul:

“For you did not receive the spirit of slavery to fall back into fear, but you have received the spirit of sonship. We can invoke God the Father with confidence, not fear, when we cry, ‘Abba! Father!’” (Romans 8:15… and “Abba” does not mean “daddy”).

CURRENT ICEL (2011):

Almighty ever-living God,
whom, taught by the Holy Spirit,
we dare to call our Father,
bring, we pray, to perfection in our hearts
the spirit of adoption as your sons and daughters,
that we may merit to enter into the inheritance
which you have promised
.

During the Holy Mass, through the words, actions and intentions of the ordained priest, as a Church we presume with trusting audacity to consecrate bread and wine and change them substantially to the Body and Blood of the Second Person of the Trinity.

We do this because Jesus commanded us to do so, but it is a harrowing and consoling undertaking all the same.

We are laying hands upon truly sacred things, the most sacred things there can be: Christ’s Body, Blood, soul and divinity.

What could be more presumptuous?

Two sections of the great Corpus Christi sequence by St. Thomas Aquinas (+1274) remind us of what is at stake when we approach the Blessed Sacrament for Communion (not my translation):

“Here beneath these signs are hidden
priceless things, to sense forbidden;
signs, not things, are all we see.
Flesh from bread, and Blood from wine,
yet is Christ in either sign,
all entire confessed to be.
Both the wicked and the good
eat of this celestial Food:
but with ends how opposite!
With this most substantial Bread,
unto life or death they’re fed,
in a difference infinite.”

That last part bears repeating: “Mors est malis, vita bonis: / vide paris sumptionis / quam sit dispar exitus.”

Eternal death for the wicked if they receive Communion improperly. Eternal life for the good if they receive well.

See how dissimilar the different outcomes from the same act of Holy Communion can be?

This is good to ponder during Mass and the lead up to Mass:

Am I properly disposed to receive what Christ and the Church have promised are truly His Body and Blood?

Do I dare receive?

When was my last good confession?

Immediately after the Eucharistic Prayer but before our intrepid reception of Communion, we dare to pray with the words that the same Son taught us.

In introducing the Lord’s Prayer the priest says in Latin, “Having been instructed/urged by saving commands and formed by divine institution, we dare/presume (audemus) to say, ‘Our Father…’”. Audeo is “to venture, to dare”, and in this it is a synonym of praesumo.

Jesus taught us to see God as Father in a way that no ever one had before. Christ revolutionized our prayer. In our lowliness we now dare to raise our eyes and venture to speak to God in a new way. We come to Him as children of a new “sonship”.

We learned from our examination of the Collect for the Third Sunday of Easter that adoptio is “adoption” in the sense of “to take as one’s child”. We find the phrase in Paul: adoptionem filiorum Dei or “adoption of the sons of God” in the Latin Vulgate of Jerome (cf. Romans 8:23; Galatians 4:5; Ephesians 1:5).

We do not approach God as fearful slaves. We are now also able to receive Communion with reverent confidence provided we have prepared well. God has done His part.

God will come to us not as “stranger God”, but as Father God!

What God does for us is not cold or impersonal. It is an act of love.

Even in commanding us, God the Son did not mean to terrify us into paralysis. This, however, was the result for some who, when hearing Christ’s teaching about His flesh, left Him because what they heard was too hard (cf. John 6). We need not be terrified… overwhelmed with awe, certainly, but not by terror.

Warned, urged, instructed by a divine Person who taught us with divine precepts, let’s get straight who our Father is and who we are because of who He is.  It is NOT a relationship of equals.

We are children of a loving Father. He comes looking for us to draw us unto Him because of His fatherly heart. The Holy Father Pope John Paul II wrote for the Church’s preparation for the Millennium Jubilee:

“If God goes in search of man, created in his own image and likeness, he does so because he loves him eternally in the Word, and wishes to raise him in Christ to the dignity of an adoptive son” (Tertio millennio adveniente 6).

As God’s adopted children we have dignity.

The adoption brought by the Spirit is not some second rate relationship with God or mere juridical slight of hand. It is the fulfillment of an eternal love and longing. This is a primary and foundational dimension of everything we are as Catholic Christians. It is perhaps for this reason that that the Catechism of the Catholic Church speaks so clearly to this point, in the first paragraph.

The adoption we speak about in this Collect is something far more profound than a juridical act by which one who is truly not of the same blood and bone is therefore considered, legally, to be so. Some Protestants see our return to righteousness in God’s sight, that is, justification through baptism, in these terms: a sort of legal sleight of hand whereby we remain in reality guilty and corrupt, but our disgusting sinful nature is ignored by the Father because the merits of Christ are interposed between His eyes and our debased nature.

However, we know by divine revelation and the continuing teaching of the Christian Church that by baptism more than a legal fiction takes place.

We are more than justified, we are sanctified.

Something of God’s divine grace is given to us, infused into our being so that we truly become sons and daughters of Almighty God, transformed radically from within, as members of Christ’s own Mystical Person. Thus, we too share Christ’s sonship. It is almost as if God infused His own Holiness DNA into us to make us His own in a sense far beyond any legal adoption could accomplish.  This transformation alters who we are without removing our individuality or dignity as persons. We are His and unified as One in Christ, and yet we remain ourselves. We are integrated into a new structure of Communion, indeed a new family.

By our discordant actions we can make this earthly dimension of our supernatural family, our Church, dysfunctional.

What a mystery it is that God, who lavishes upon us the mighty transforming graces we all have known and profess to love, leaves also in our hands the freedom to spurn Him and trivialize His gifts.

This freedom, itself a gift, could only be a Father’s gift to beloved children.

Posted in WDTPRS | Tagged
Comments Off on WDTPRS – 19th Ordinary Sunday: God will come to us not as “stranger God”, but as Father God!

Daily Rome Shot 239

Photo by Bree Dail.

UPDATE YOUR LINK!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
Comments Off on Daily Rome Shot 239

Daily Rome Shot 238

Photo by Bree Dail.

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
Comments Off on Daily Rome Shot 238

6 August 1221 – 800th Anniversary of the Death of St. Dominic. Imagine what things would be like without him.

Today is the 800th Anniversary of the Death of St. Dominic.

In other words it is also his “birth day”. The term used for the death of saints is “Dies Natalis“, one’s “birth” into heaven.

Imagine what things might have been like without St. Dominic.

No, I don’t think we have to. We are seeing something of what they would have been like.

However, God raises up certain saints in particular places and times to carry out important works of reform.

Shall we see the like of St. Dominic, founder of the Order or Preachers, again?

At least in the times we are living now we have had a Dominic, in our past, to help up now in example and in intercession.

St. Dominic, pray for us.

All Dominican saints, pray for us.

Posted in Saints: Stories & Symbols | Tagged
1 Comment

Daily Rome Shot 237

Photo by Bree Dail.

UPDATE YOUR LINK!

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
3 Comments

ACTION ITEM! Help fix the roof of a small parish with the TLM. Keep those doors open!

Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their … Traditional Latin Masses.

I received this plea from a reader…


I was hoping you could assist our parish by getting the word out, who is doing some major restoration ( our 100yr old ceiling was coming down)

“Please pass on this go fund me link to anyone you think might be willing to financially assist a small traditional Catholic country parish with a major restoration.
Thanks!”

https://www.gofundme.com/f/s-francis-de-sales-church-restoration

Fr. Cusick is a great priest and shepherd.


Many hand make light work, friends.   Even small donations, if made by many, can make a difference to these people.  I remember back in 2013 I posted about Fr. Cusick gathering pledges to help the Archdiocese for the Military Services by running in a marathon.  You stepped up and his pledges went through the ceiling.  HERE

Let’s help with this other ceiling.

Even small, if from many.  Give up a coffee or a Big Mac, as you would, being a good Custos traditionis (a daily Memorare and a weekly penance for the softening of the hearts of those who interpret Traditionis custodes).   Almsgiving.

As of this posting:

UPDATE 5 Aug 21 – 0900

Posted in ¡Hagan lío!, ACTION ITEM!, The Campus Telephone Pole | Tagged
9 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 237

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
3 Comments

PRAYER TO SAINT JOSEPH, TERROR OF DEMONS

PRAYER TO SAINT JOSEPH, TERROR OF DEMONS

Saint Joseph, Terror of Demons, cast thy solemn gaze upon the devil and all his minions, and protect us with thy mighty staff.

Thou didst flee through the night to avoid the devil’s wicked designs; now with the power of God, smite the demons as they flee from thee!

Grant special protection, we pray, for children, fathers, [priests], families, and the dying.

By God’s grace, no demon dares approach whilst thou art near, so we beg of thee, always be near to us! Amen.

Saint Joseph, terror of demons, pray for us.

Posted in ACTION ITEM!, Urgent Prayer Requests | Tagged
3 Comments

Mosebach: “The vehemence of the motu proprio’s language suggests that this directive has come too late. “

The distinguished German author Martin Mosebach, whose amazing books I do not tire of recommending, has a piece at First Things about the Motu Proprio Traditionis custodes (TC).

Mosebach begins from the premise that “papal authority is unraveling as never before” and the Church has “advanced to an ungovernable stage”.

This seems hardly to be disputed, given what Rome did to the Catholics in China, the “gay” mafia running things, bankrupt dioceses, “synodal” (walking together) paths that lead to the cliff’s edge, openly homosexualist Jesuits are applauded by the hierarchy even as hundreds of faithful priests are being cancelled by chanceries for speaking up, and bishops willingly give Communion to people like Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi.

The cherry on top is a war on the Traditional Roman Rite whose participants are young and committed and rapidly growing in numbers at a time when a demographic sinkhole is opening up beneath the rest of the Church.

But, who am I to judge?

Mosebach: “The vehemence of the motu proprio’s language suggests that this directive has come too late.”

He makes a point which I have underscored here since the extruding of TC.  There is no comparison between the 1980’s, when to obtain the TLM people had to go cap in hand and tug their forelock and Catholic news media were limited to gawdawful diocesan newspapers and the increasingly dissident Fishwrap (aka National Schismatic Reporter), Today, people have massive, rapid access to information. They can network quickly. Bishops have nearly completely squandered their moral capital, and many younger Catholic have been able to experience the TLM in a peaceful, stable way.

And they want it.

And the bishops are going to… what?  Say, “You can’t have it!”?

No….  Not that.  It’ll more along the lines of “If you want your Latin Mass, you can keep your Latin Mass.”

Pace one of the greatest public liars in modern history.

Mosebach:

Perhaps the Mass is not what most concerns the pope. Francis appears to sympathize with the “hermeneutic of rupture”—that theological school that asserts that with the Second Vatican Council the Church broke with her tradition. If that is true, then indeed every celebration of the traditional liturgy must be prevented. For as long as the old Latin Mass is celebrated in any garage, the memory of the previous two thousand years will not have been extinguished.

This memory, however, cannot be rooted out by the blunt exercise of papal legal positivism. It will return again and again, and will be the criterion by which the Church of the future will have to measure itself.

Not too long ago Peter Kwasniewski and I spent the better part of a morning together at breakfast and discussion after my early Mass.

At the time, a couple months before TC was extruded, I raised my concern that a new argument was developing on the papalotrous, sycophantic left.  I was catching a patchwork of theological, ecclesiological attacks on the Traditional Roman Rite (far more extensive than just the Mass).  The ecclesiological line ran something like this:

Vatican II must be the lens through which ALL OF TRADITION is to be read.  Vatican II, that is the Spirit of Vatican II, and not necessarily the texts, provides the way to reinterpret the entirety of Tradition, back to Apostolic times, and then provides the normative framework for how to apply Tradition to our needs in an ongoing way. Therefore, the TLM must be repressed because it is contrary to the ecclesiology of the Spirit of Vatican II.

Pay attention.

This is the Rahnerian “hermeneutic of rupture” school hopped up on too much sugar and cartoons.  Anyone can see through this B as in B, S as in S.   What this line of thought does is allow the total jettisoning of the Church’s teachings, rooted in the Regula Fidei and natural law, about faith and morals It creates an ever shifting set of lenses.   I am reminded of Card. Kasper’s puerile attempt to argue away the Lord’s prohibition of adultery by saying that, in Christ’s time, what Christ said about adultery was right, but each subsequent age has to reevaluate what Christ said in light of its own circumstances.  So, contradicting what Christ said then is not to say that Christ was wrong, but rather that we have to reinterpret the inner meaning of his historically conditioned words.

That’s what we are up against… again.  Perpetually.

Papal legal positivism fueled by Rahnerian modernism, in theology slowly replacing philosophy with politics, as Thomas Heinrich Stark pointed out in his hard, but dead-on-target explanation in 2018.

It’s the “lived experience” approach that twisted two Synods (walking together) on the Family.

Mosebach concludes:

Perhaps the Mass is not what most concerns the pope. Francis appears to sympathize with the “hermeneutic of rupture”—that theological school that asserts that with the Second Vatican Council the Church broke with her tradition. If that is true, then indeed every celebration of the traditional liturgy must be prevented. For as long as the old Latin Mass is celebrated in any garage, the memory of the previous two thousand years will not have been extinguished.

This memory, however, cannot be rooted out by the blunt exercise of papal legal positivism. It will return again and again, and will be the criterion by which the Church of the future will have to measure itself.

Regarding his point about “memory”.  That’s important for Mosebach.  I recall a passage in The Heresy of Formlessness: The Roman Liturgy and Its Enemy, where describes the resentment a rock probably feels if it is shifted from its perennial, traditional, place.  It might require centuries for the rock to settle down.

THAT’s how important our sacred liturgical worship is!   Even the details are important, not “superfluous” as my friend Fr. Jackson put it.

Change the entire rite of Mass and suddenly impose it?   It hasn’t really worked, has it.  Look around.

Seek to repress the rite of Mass in use, mainly, since before the time of Gregory the Great?  Suppress the rite that did work in favor of the one that didn’t?

Not likely.

Posted in Hard-Identity Catholicism, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Save The Liturgy - Save The World, The Coming Storm, The Drill, The future and our choices | Tagged , , , , ,
36 Comments