At APOD today we find a pic of the Mercury-Redstone 3 lift-off from Cape Canaveral of Alan Shepard in Freedom 7. 5 May 1961… 60 years ago.
60 years.

Alan Shepard would later command Apollo 14 and walk on your planet’s Moon.
At APOD today we find a pic of the Mercury-Redstone 3 lift-off from Cape Canaveral of Alan Shepard in Freedom 7. 5 May 1961… 60 years ago.
60 years.

Alan Shepard would later command Apollo 14 and walk on your planet’s Moon.

3rd c. allegorical depiction in the Catacombs of Priscilla of the praying Church, hands in the “orans” position. This is NOT, as confused feminists claim, ancient evidence of female priests.
From a reader…
QUAERITUR:
Please comment on lay persons extending their hands while praying the Our Father as the priest does during the Novus Ordo Mass. I feel like you have addressed this topic before but I am unable to find your discussion and would like to send it to a friend. Thank you.
The extension of hands which you describe is the “orans” position, the “praying” position. It is an ancient posture of prayer, particularly for priests praying for and in the name of the people.
During the Our Father the faithful are not to use the orans position, which is the proper hand position of an ordained priest in prayer. The orans position is reserved for a certain liturgical role (read: priest – not even deacons). That position of extended hands is not appropriate for the lay faithful in the pews. Even worse is when they hold that position after the Our Father through the (Protestant) addition that follows.
We must not mix or confuse liturgical roles. Lay people have their own dignity without trying to jazz them up by – and how condescending is this? how clericalist in the worst sense? – by allowing them to do what the priest does. That’s the worst sort of clericalism. When lay and clerical roles are confused for the sake of “active participation” or “getting the laity involved”, the underlying subtext is “You aren’t good enough on your own, so I’ll let you do something that I can do.” Grrrrr. Mind you, I don’t think that all priests who try to get lay people to do things are purposely trying to be condescending clericalists. They are probably well-intentioned. But they haven’t thought through the subtle message in their choice.
On a related now, I am unaware of an official prohibition of holding hands during Mass, so long as it is spontaneous and not invited by anyone or virtually imposed by some Good Idea Fairy with a microphone. It should not be imposed by your neighbor in the pew, either.
There are people at Mass who really would like to be left alone. That’s okay. Leave them alone.
Every once in a while I get a question about Fr. John Corapi, once a highly sought and popular speaker who influenced a lot of people. He eventually had a sort of train-wreck in his life and dropped out of sight. Corapi comes to my mind occasionally because we were, coincidentally, ordained together. I didn’t know him at the time. He was just another one of the guys being ordained that day.
This upcoming 26 May will be our 30th anniversary.
When queried about Fr. Corapi, I haven’t been able to give any news, until now. I was sent a link to a piece by Matt Abbott at RenewAmerican.com about him. HERE
It seems that Fr. Corapi has reconciled with his religious society (SOLT) and has living as a monk, praying and doing penance.
If this is indeed the case, then good for him. We should all be happy when a person turns around.
It amazes me that some people who profess to be Christian are so fast to thrown a repentant and converted person’s past life in their teeth. Don’t we want, and hope for and pray for the conversion of sinners? When they do, shouldn’t we rejoice? We don’t have to make them our best friends all of a sudden. We might not rouse ourselves up to be able to like them very much. But we should at least be as gracious toward them as we would hope they would be to us were the situation reversed, had we done the harm.
For example, I would be over the moon were someone like Joe Biden publicly to denounce his evil positions about abortion. I certainly wouldn’t continue to drub him with his past positions if he genuinely changed and made it public. I would be ecstatic were certain Jesuits to reverse their ways.
We need to be merciful not just toward the repentant and converted, but also toward the unrepentant and even malicious who continue in their evil work. Mind you, I do NOT mean Fr. Corapi in any way as the latter. He has, to my knowledge, never directed any harm in my direction. But there are those who have.
I regularly pray for my enemies, people who even now are harassing and slandering me, people who have done unjust harm. I say Masses for them. I genuinely want them not to die in their sins and go to Hell. I sincerely hope they will attain the bliss of heaven. I ask God to give them what they truly need, what is truly good for them for repentance. Were they to apologize for the harm they’ve done I would warmly forgive them, even as I strive to forgive them now, in advance. I take as a model, St. Thomas More who in his final letter to Henry VIII hoped: “I should once meet with your Grace again in heaven, and there be merry with you”.
“[I]f you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father also will forgive you; but if you do not forgive men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.” Matthew 6:14-15
A stance of unforgiving rigidity is lethal to one’s own soul.
At the Italian blog Messa in Latino we receive news about the Canons of St. Peter’s Basilica that was in Il Messaggero.
What, who are canons?
There are all sorts of canons. “Canon” is applied to the list of books of Scripture, the individual laws in a collection called the Code, and to certain persons.
In the Roman, Latin Church among the things that canon can mean is a members of a group called a chapter (capitulum) or college. Historically they would live together. Today, not so much. Cathedrals and great churches had chapters which saw to the financial and material issues of the buildings, holdings, etc. They had also a liturgical role to sing the office and to be present at liturgical functions. Canons had particular dress and their living from the chapter.
In Europe there are still chapters, but these structures have disappeared in these USA.
The major basilicas of Rome have chapters of canons, including St. Peter’s. The 24 main canons (there are other “honorary canons”, clerics who need some income) have been an important component of the whole life of this important basilica. They have for centuries been present for papal functions. They have participated in the administration of the goods, holdings and buildings associated with the basilica. They have their own chapel in St. Peter’s and a sacristy.
For centuries, indeed a millennium, since at least the 10th century, canons have been central to the life of St. Peter’s, old and new.
Messa in Latino reports something from Il Messaggero:
The Pope forbids Canons to enter St. Peter’s
1 May 2021 by Franca Giansoldati
Vatican City – “Forbidden to enter St. Peter’s. Today the canons of the Basilica cannot enter. Orders from Superiors.” This is the phrase uttered by an embarrassed worker at the Basilica, delivered to the disconcerted Canons of St. Peter’s who today had desired to participate in the Rosary with Pope Francis.
[…]
For some time now, however, the canons – there are about thirty of them – seem to be in Pope Francis’ crosshairs. It is probably one of those sectors in which he would like to bring some order. A few years ago the Pope, seeing two canons during a solemn function serving behind the Cardinals in their usual fuchsia-colored garb, it is said that the dumbfounded Pope asked who were “those two priests dressed in technicolor”.
[…]
After the Suppression of individual Masses in St. Peter’s, and now this, one wonders what we might read in the near future.
“St. Peter’s converted to museum. Residual liturgies moved to Paul VI Audience Hall.”