Tracer Bullet and the Smoke of Libville. Episode 8: Spies, Lies and a Bark in the Dark

Continued from Episode 7 – HERE

The door swung shut behind us with a click that sounded like a trap snapping on a rat that thought it was in charge.

The conference room reeked of pumpkin spice coffee and betrayal. Bishop F. Atticus McButterpants perched at the round table, cheeks pink from whatever catered buffet he’d demolished, his face caught between boredom and the creeping suspicion that the collection plate had a hole in it.

Clerics and lay “facilitators” tilted their heads toward the simpering priest. Hugalot froze like a French mime in mid-gesture.

Patsy Meeks loomed behind the bishop. When her eyes locked on us, they went flat and bright, like a serpent sizing up a couple of careless field mice.

The bishop perked up. “Father Tommy! What…um…what are you doing here? It’s wonderful to see you, but…I never thought…”.

Tommy stepped closer. Hugalot shrank back like a … French mime.

“You never thought I’d come to a meeting like this? You’re right, Your Excellency,” Tommy said, voice steady. “Under normal circumstances, I wouldn’t be caught dead…”—he shot a cold glance at Hugalot — “…except to end the monstrous betrayal of your good-natured desire to make everyone happy.”

“Father. Detective.” Meeks’s smile was all laminate and lemon. “We weren’t expecting you.”

Tommy’s cassock whispered like a warning as he stepped to the projection system. The bishop’s bleary eyes landed on me like I was a package dropped at the wrong door.

“Tracer Bullet? Tommy? What is this? Why is the legendary private eye with you?” He tried to straighten up. “You’d better explain right now.”

Tommy held up the USB drive, letting the overhead lights glint off the plastic. Then he slotted it into the port, and the projector whirred to life.

“Your Excellency,” he said, voice pitched just loud enough, “we have reason to believe this listening circle is more of a pressure chamber. You’ve been fed false information. They even sent letters in your name to the Nuncio.”

At the word Nuncio, the bishop’s color drained as fast as the coffers in the diocese’s quarterly reports.

Meeks folded her arms, voice dripping acid. “We were clarifying the bishop’s pastoral instincts for him.”

Tommy began scrolling images across the screen—memos, doctored letters, emails with timestamps that told the real story.

“This one,” I said, tapping a line with the laser pointer, “quotes you endorsing ‘the absolute retirement’ of the Traditional Latin Mass, ripping out altar rails, forbidding Latin and ad orientem worship, Roman vestments, kneeling for Communion, reception on the tongue.  You even suggest bullying little girls for wearing a chapel veil like their mothers.”

In the silence there was an audible gasp from the bishop.    “I NEVER….

Fr. Tommy continued like he was reading last rites, voice low and unhurried, “… all for the sake of unity and congruence with Vatican II.”

As the priest concluded I added, “We know you didn’t do these things, Bishop.  They did, in your name.   They diced and spliced your words counting on the fact that you didn’t know what you didn’t know.”

The bishop’s mouth worked silently. “I…I never wanted to eliminate anything. I mean, I’m not into that stuff… but… but…I just asked for feedback. Dialogue!”

Meeks stepped forward, voice sharpened to a scalpel. “With respect, Bishop, people are tired of kneeling and Latin. They want something expressive. Something that breathes.”

I flicked to another slide.

“Bishop, we have proof Ms. Meeks and C.I.L.I. fabricated opposition to the TLM and pre-drafted statements claiming your support. They built a false consensus to manipulate your decisions. They lied to the Nuncio about you.  Here’s the proof.”

I pulled the USB drive and slid it across the table to the Bishop’s pudgy hand, his ring in the florescent light looking like a gold-plated manhole cover waiting for some poor sap to fall through. He hesitated, index hovering over the plastic as if it might bite. Maybe it would. In this town, secrets had sharper teeth than truth ever did.

The bishop sagged back, all pretense evaporating. “This stops. Tonight. Meeks, you’re relieved of any liturgical duties. The Council is suspended pending canonical review.”

“I’ll inform the Nuncio myself,” Tommy said.

Meeks wheeled toward us, eyes bright with murderous calculation.

Then a bark echoed in the hall through the door. Not a normal bark. More like the sound a drywall sheet might make if it was being exorcised.

Fr. Tommy fixed his eyes on Patsy Meeks.

“That’d be Chester,” he said.

TO BE CONTINUED….

Posted in SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
7 Comments

TLM suppression REPRIEVE in Texas

LifeSite says HERE that Rome has granted St. Margaret’s parish in San Angelo a two-year permission to continue offering the Latin Mass despite Pope Francis’ restrictions.

This even as “The Great Diminishment” begins in Detroit.

The Archbishop there could have asked for an extension and, probably, have gotten it.  That’s speculation on my part of course.  But look at San Angelo.

Curious.

Posted in I'm just askin'..., SESSIUNCULA |
5 Comments

HUGE: “Official Vatican Report Exposes Major Cracks in Foundation of Traditionis Custodes”

Diane Montagna has it. HERE

You might remember that part of the justification Francis used for stomping on the TLM (aka the people who wanted it) was a consultation of bishops around the world.

It turns out that what we were told about that justification may not have been entirely on the up and up.

Read all of Montagna’s piece there. However.

EXCLUSIVE: Official Vatican Report Exposes Major Cracks in Foundation of Traditionis Custodes
Previously undisclosed documents raise serious questions about the stated rationale for Pope Francis’ 2021 decree restricting the Traditional Latin Mass.

VATICAN CITY, July 1, 2025 — New evidence has come to light that exposes major cracks in the foundation of Traditionis Custodes, Pope Francis’ 2021 decree that restricted the traditional Roman liturgy.

This journalist has obtained the Vatican’s overall assessment of the consultation of bishops that was said to have “prompted” Pope Francis to revoke Summorum Pontificum, Benedict XVI’s 2007 apostolic letter liberalizing the vetus ordo, more commonly known as the “Traditional Latin Mass” and sacraments.

The previously undisclosed text, which forms a crucial part of the official report by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith on its 2020 consultation of bishops concerning Summorum Pontificum, reveals that “the majority of bishops who responded to the questionnaire stated that making legislative changes to Summorum Pontificum would cause more harm than good.”

The overall assessment directly contradicts, therefore, the stated rationale for imposing Traditionis Custodes and raises serious questions about its credibility.

[…]

[FRANCIS] told the bishops that he was “constrained” by their “requests” to revoke not only Summorum Pontificum but “all the norms, instructions, permissions and customs” that preceded his new decree.

However, what the Vatican’s overall assessment reveals is that the “gaps”, “divergences”, and “disagreements” stem more from a level of nescience, prejudice and resistance of a minority of bishops to Summorum Pontificum than from any problems originating from adherents to the traditional Roman liturgy.

Conversely, the official CDF report states that “the majority of bishops who responded to the questionnaire, and who have generously and intelligently implemented Summorum Pontificum, ultimately express satisfaction with it.” It adds that “in places where the clergy have closely cooperated with the bishop, the situation has become completely pacified.”

The overall assessment, which can be viewed at the end of this article in the original Italian and in an English translation, also confirms the contention I reported in October 2021: That Traditionis Custodes magnified and projected as a major problem what was merely ancillary in the official CDF report.

Furthermore, the text clearly shows that Traditionis Custodes disregarded and withheld what the report said about the peace Summorum Pontificum had restored, and turned a blind eye to a “constant observation made by the bishops”— that younger people were being drawn into the Catholic Church through this older form of the liturgy.

The overall assessment also predicted, based on the responses of bishops, what would ensue were Summorum Pontificum suppressed — forecasts that turned out to be accurate.

[…]

Montagna describes the genesis and structure of the official report.  There is an anecdote about Francis snatching the report from Card. Ladaria’s hand.

Then, in the overall assessment part of the report, it seems that the majority of bishops who implemented Summorum Pontificum were satisfied with it.

Furthermore, the report found that “the bishops most attuned to this matter observe that the older form of the liturgy is a treasure of the Church to be safeguarded and preserved: it constitutes a good to find unity with the past, to know how to advance along a path of coherent development and progress, and to meet, as far as possible, the needs of these faithful.”

According to the report: “The majority of bishops who responded to the questionnaire state that making legislative changes to the MP Summorum Pontificum would cause more harm than good.”

Based on its findings, the report predicted that “weakening or suppressing Summorum Pontificum would seriously damage the life of the Church, as it would recreate the tensions that the document had helped to resolve.”

Moreover, “it would delegitimize two Pontiffs—John Paul II and Benedict XVI—who had committed themselves to not abandoning these faithful.”

[…]

Interesting.  Isn’t that last point what we saw systematically going on for some 13 years?

You will want to read the whole thing.

Fr. Z kudos to Diana Montagna and a biretta tip…

o{]:¬)

Posted in Liturgy Science Theatre 3000, Pò sì jiù, SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM, The future and our choices, Traditionis custodes | Tagged
21 Comments

LIVE VIDEO – Card. Burke Celebrating Pontifical Mass for the Feast of the Most Precious Blood.

AS I WRITE THIS….  Card. Burke is celebrating Pontifical Mass for the Feast of the Most Precious Blood.

LIVE STREAM

YouTube thumbnailYouTube icon

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
1 Comment

Sunday 1 July in Detroit. The “Great Diminishment” has begun: A tongue in check suggestion.

This is pretty sad.

Even with the election of a new Pope, whose views are not yet perfectly manifest, the Archbishop of Detroit leapt to shut down Traditional Latin Masses far and wide, leaving only a few, thus hurting and inconveniencing a lot of the most active, generous, faithful Catholic families and individuals under his pastoral charge. This cynical move goes into effect on 1 July.

The “Great Diminishment” has begun.

Was it really for the good of the life of the Church in Detroit?

One of the things that the Archbishop stressed while he was snuffing out Masses, is that people going from one zipcode to another to attend Holy Mass (which they have the right to do) are to continue to give their hard-earned money to their territorial parishes where they are not receiving services.

One of my priest friends sent this.

  • Since the Archbishop reminded people of their need to contribute financially to their [territorial] parish, and not just the church they attend for the Latin Mass, and
  • since people in the archdiocese regularly “register” at a parish that is not their proper territorial (or personal) parish, and
  • since those people who do register at a parish other than their proper parish are not disciplined or scolded in any way
  • I propose that those who attend the Latin Mass in Detroit “register” at Santissima Trinita dei Pellegrini parish in Rome and send their regular contributions there.

That clever and pretty funny.   The Parish™ donation page (in Italian) is HERE.   Don’t worry, it’s not hard to figure out and you can right-click and get a translation quickly.

Posted in Lighter fare, Mail from priests | Tagged
10 Comments

Tracer Bullet and the Smoke of Libville. Episode 7: The Threshold of No Return

Continued from Episode 6 – HERE

I pulled the Charger up into chancery lot just as the rain tapered from its sulky drizzle. The building loomed in the evening fug, concrete and glass stacked like a columbarium of forgotten ideals. I killed the engine and let the quiet settle over me, the last drag of my cigarette glowing in the rearview.

A black sedan crept up behind me and stopped. The door swung open, and out stepped Fr. Tommy, cassock flaring in the damp wind. His eyes found mine.  No nod. No sign. Just the tacit acknowledgment of two men who’d chosen the same battlefield trench.

I flicked the cigarette onto the pavement. We fell into step without a word, shoes scuffing over slick concrete.

Father Tommy took us to a little used side entrance, the one diocesan staffers pretended not to know about. Fr. Tommy was a step in front me.  He knew the place after his years of work there.  The hall smelled of mop water and bureaucratic decay, stale air that stuck to your tongue. A flickering exit sign threw jittery shadows across the corridor.

We moved quickly through the hallways, down a stair, and into a corridor lined with framed photos of past bishops grinning beside donors and minor celebrities, all teeth and no sincerity. Tommy’s cassock whispered across the tiles. My coat felt heavy from the backup printouts tucked inside, a dossier turgid with liturgical grift and sanctimonious double-dealing.

At the end of the hall, a pair of double doors stood half-open. A sign was taped to the door Council for Inclusive Liturgy Innovation. C.I.L.I.  There was an intermittent surge of clapping, drumming, and something that sounded suspiciously like a didgeridoo.

Inside, we could seen a “discernment tapestry” hanging behind a deconstructed altar made of recycled IKEA press-board and driftwood from the diocesan Eco-Pilgrimage led by Fr. Warmflannel.  Fr. “Just call me Bruce” Hugalot was leaning into a little performance about “new paradigms of parish engagement,” his voice as greasy as Oil of the Sick left too long in the sacristy cabinet.

Fr. Tommy shot me a look that said he’d had enough. I nodded back.

Time to lay the cards on the table before they printed more glossy brochures about the future they were busy gutting.

The priest squared his shoulders. I checked the weight of the folder in my coat.

We went in, Father first, me just behind.

The door swung shut behind us with a click that sounded like a trap snapping on a rat that thought it was in charge.

TO BE CONTINUED

 
 
 

[Cue sultry saxophone and crackling static]

ANNOUNCER (rich world-weary baritone):

Tonight’s episode of Tracer Bullet And The Smoke of Libville was brought to you by Sanctus Blend Incense Company, purveyors of the finest liturgical resins this side of the Tiber. When your parish needs to chase away the smell of compromise, heresy, and give praise to the Almighty light up a thurible full of Sanctus Blend. Accept no imitations.

And don’t miss tomorrow’s episode…

[low, suspenseful vibraphone chords]

…when Tracer and Father Tommy, in the depths of the the chancery, unmask the labyrinth of trickery and liturgical skullduggery for a befuddled bishop Francis Atticus McB.  It’s the episode they’re calling…

[echo effect]

SPIES, LIES AND A BARK IN THE DARK

Same frequency. Same smoke curling under the door. 

Smoke by Sanctus Blend, that is.  Because the truth should smell sweeter than lies.

[Cue fade-out sax riff]

Posted in Lighter fare, SESSIUNCULA | Tagged
3 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1383 – The chains of St. Paul

Yesterday at the Basilica St. Paul outside-the-walls in Rome, there was the annual procession with St. Paul’s chains.  The Archconfraternity of the Most Holy Trinity, from The Parish™, took part.

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance (massively hiked for this new year of surprises), utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

HEY! a*****.w****@erickson.com! My thank you notes to you are being kicked back as undeliverable. New mail? Drop me a line, please. HERE

In chessy news, there was a spiffy game, being called “game of the year” in Uzbekistan between Richard Rapport and Praggnanandhaa Rameshbabu which even had Garry Kasparov’s admiration. HERE

Meanwhile, white to move and mate in 5. Can you find it? HERE

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
3 Comments

ASK FATHER: Children playing Mass, etc.

From a reader…

QUAERITUR:

My autistic teenage son was recently confirmed and received his first communion from Cardinal Dolan at St. Patrick’s Cathedral.  Although I’ve lived in and around NYC for more than 30 years, I realized I knew next to nothing about the Cardinal’s biography.  His entry on Wikipedia (I know) states, among other things, that “He would…pretend to celebrate mass as a child [in the 1950’s].”  This used to be a somewhat common, or at least not rare, practice from things I’ve previously read.  The fact that such child’s play is now all but unimaginable is, I believe, noteworthy and illustrates a fundamental distinction between pre and post-conciliar liturgical forms and praxis.  How would today’s child pretend to offer Mass?  Would he start off with a few jokes or anecdotes?  How would he decide among options A, B and C?  I’ve not developed this idea beyond what’s written here but again, there’s seems to something profound that one form of the liturgy is amenable to a child’s imitation while the other is not.  Play, after all, is one of the primary means that children learn how to be adults.

St. Thomas Aquinas likens worship to play, since both activities are engaged in for their own sake.

I see no problem with small children playing Mass.  As they get to the age of reason, however they should, even with some prompting, eventually conclude that they should be doing something else.  Parents ought to be watching carefully how and what their children do at every age. If a child is getting older and starts to really think he is saying Mass, that is a deeper problem.

I don’t know what to say about your autistic son playing Mass.  That’s a special circumstance that I cannot gauge.

Also, girls should not do this.

Bottom line: Provided everything is done with the respect and care, it is okay for little kids to “play Mass”, although … I can’t imagine it is too fun to play “Novus Ordo”.

Speaking of that, the questioner added…

Speaking of NYC, I’ve always likened the differences between the new and old liturgical forms to those between the new and old Penn Stations.  As to the former, some of the bones of the old station still remain but for the most part, new Penn Station would be largely unrecognizable to a passenger from the 40’s or 50’s.  The new station still fulfills most of the functions of the old (one can still catch the 5:15 to Oyster Bay).  No one, however, draws any inspiration from the new station.  Rather, as one art historian is often quoted as saying, “Through Pennsylvania Station one entered the city like a god.”  That though has never occurred to me during my many trips in and out of the station over the years.

Penn Station was magnificent.  I suppose the gradual shift away from trains to cars prompted some to think that Penn Station was a waste of space.  Alas, that was a time of utilitarianism and the result was hideous.  In years past during my frequent trips to NYC I often had supper with a group after saying Mass at Tracks.  Penn Station was ghastly.  I understand that in the last few years some changes have been made with the new train hall that expanded to the old Post Office, that Tracks has reopened somewhere and that there is a LIRR expansion at Grand Central Terminal.  But as far as Penn Station is concerned, I can’t keep myself from thinking about fixing up the Novus Ordo with elements of the Vetus Ordo: yeah, okay, it’s a little better…. but ….

Posted in "How To..." - Practical Notes, ASK FATHER Question Box, Liturgy Science Theatre 3000 |
8 Comments

Your Sunday Sermon Notes: Sts. Peter and Paul – 2025

Too many people today are without good, strong preaching, to the detriment of all. Share the good stuff.

Was there a GOOD point made in the sermon you heard at your Mass of obligation for the this Sunday?  It is/was the Feast/Solemnity of Sts. Peter and Paul in both the Vetus Ordo, the Usus Antiquior and that new one.

Tell about attendance especially for the Traditional Latin Mass.

Any local changes or (hopefully good) news?  I know there is a lot of BAD news.  How about some good news?

A taste of my thoughts from the other place: HERE

In Acts 12 we hear about how Peter was imprisoned.  There were four squads of guards (v. 4) and, bounds with chains, he had to sleep between two soldiers with sentries at the door (v. 6).  Not a hopeful scenario in human terms but nothing special for an angel.  However, between v. 4 and v. 6 we read:

earnest prayer for him was made to God by the church (v. 5).

The Church’s pastors need your earnest prayers.  Is there something you could be doing for, perhaps, a particular – let’s say – bishop?  One who seems to be under fire, or somewhat out of it?  Is there one whom you find especially annoying?  It is, firstly, hard to cling to hatred or annoyance toward one for whom you sincerely and assiduously pray and offer penances and acts of reparation.  Bishops and priests are high value targets for the Enemy and they need prayers.  The Enemy hates them in a relentless and savage way.  Bring one down and the whole Church suffers.  The whole Church in Peter’s time was small, but they prayed for Peter and he was miraculously rescued.  The people who prayed became the cooperating instruments, intermediaries of Christ’s providential action in saving Peter for his mission in Rome.

The Church’s pastors need your earnest prayers.  I am mindful of the Seven Sisters Apostolate to which I link HERE.  This is a beautiful initiative which could be joined by women.  Perhaps it could be imitated in a parallel way by men.

 

Posted in Sermons | Tagged
3 Comments

Daily Rome Shot 1382 – Peter and Paul

From St. Peter’s Basilica today from The World’s Best Sacristan™.

And from The Parish™.

Here is something interesting at The Parish™.  For extra credit, who can explain this?

Welcome Registrant:

FleurDeZ

Please remember me when shopping online and use my affiliate links.  US HEREWHY?  This helps to pay for health insurance (massively hiked for this new year of surprises), utilities, groceries, etc..  At no extra cost, you provide help for which I am grateful.

I wonder if the libs who yammer about the use of the cappa magna will insult the Ecumenical Patriarch.

Hey Fathers!  How about a clerical Guayabera shirt?  (They have mostly lay clothes, but they have some clerical items, too.)

Posted in SESSIUNCULA |
3 Comments