Tears and anger in Boston
This sad story comes from the Boston Globe.
I just posted an entry a while ago, mentioning that Archbp. Burke, when he was in St. Louis, saved one of their great churches by entrusting it to a traditional group.
Closure doesn’t have to be the only answer.
On the other hand… if people are not supporting it…. what to do?
Last rites
Parishioners at St. Casimir, Holy Trinity gather for final Mass as churches close
By Michael Paulson, Globe Staff and Christopher Baxter
Globe Correspondent / June 30, 2008
The three were the rarest of congregations: the only German Catholic parish in Greater Boston, one of the area’s last two Lithuanian churches, and the first local group of traditionalists authorized to pray in Latin.
In each case, a few hundred worshipers were bound by deep connections to history, strong sense of community, and affection for prayer in languages spoken by few in this part of the world.
The Archdiocese of Boston, strapped for cash and priests, decided it could no longer sustain the three congregations, and yesterday, it shuttered the two churches in which they worshiped: Holy Trinity in Boston’s South End, home to the German and Latin Mass congregations, and St. Casimir in Brockton, the Lithuanian parish.
In a ritual that has become familiar in Eastern Massachusetts, where Cardinal Sean P. O’Malley has cut the number of parishes from 357 to 292 over the last four years, somber and often angry worshipers packed into three funereal Masses yesterday, taking pictures, telling stories, and wondering what they will do next. Each Mass drew about 300 worshipers.
"This is a sad day, a very sad day," said Diane DuBois, who has been praying at St. Casimir for 38 years. On her lapel, she wore a pin that read, "Jesus hears us. Save our Church."
At Holy Trinity, organist George Krim, whose father, uncle, and great-grandfather also played the organ there, was greeted with applause as he played a final postlude with his teary son standing beside him. "There’s been so much joy here, it’s going to take a while," said Krim, 82.
Krim’s two brothers, both at the service, were angrier. "It was hard for me to walk out of there today," said Joe Krim, 72.
Supporters of both parishes plan to challenge the closings by appealing, first to O’Malley for reconsideration, and then to the Vatican. But the odds are long. Although a few parishes have persuaded O’Malley to reconsider, none has succeeded at the Vatican, and on Friday, Pope Benedict XVI appointed a new chief judge, Archbishop Raymond L. Burke of St. Louis, who is viewed as likely to be even less sympathetic to opponents of parish closings than was his predecessor. [That seems like a cheap shot. I think that he would be very sympathetic indeed. However, he knows the rights of the Archbishop of Boston in these matters. He must o by the law, not by what he would prefer or what he would have done himself.]
In several other closed parishes, worshipers have occupied the buildings and refused to leave – in some cases for years. However, there are no plans for such protests in Boston or Brockton.
"We recognize that there is sadness, anxiety, and hurt being felt and expressed in these parish communities," Terrence C. Donilon, the archdiocesan spokesman, said in an e-mail. "We are committed to seeing that the parishioners of Holy Trinity and St. Casimir know that, despite these closings, that we need them to help us in building up our local church."
The archdiocese is offering to accommodate the German-heritage and the Latin Mass congregations from Holy Trinity at the Cathedral of the Holy Cross, which is less than a half-mile away. But members of the two congregations are viewing the offer with some skepticism, in part because of their affection for the history and architecture of Holy Trinity, which was built by German immigrants and which has the marble communion rail, high altar, and dense iconography preferred for the Latin Mass.
The Latin Mass worshipers, who have been praying at Holy Trinity since 1990, have several other options. O’Malley has established a weekly Latin Mass at Mary Immaculate of Lourdes Church in Newton, and last year the pope opened the door to wider use of the older rite, which was replaced with Mass in English and other local languages in 1970, so there are now Latin Masses available occasionally in Brighton and East Boston, as well as, starting next week, at the cathedral.
"You become closer to God here," said Neal MacKenzie, 46, of Marshfield, who attends the Latin Mass with his wife and 10 children. "It feels more reverent."
At the same time that the archdiocese is eliminating Masses in Lithuanian and German – languages associated with immigrant populations that mostly arrived in the 19th and early 20th centuries – it has been expanding its offerings in languages spoken by more recent immigrants. Currently, Mass is said in 20 languages in the Archdiocese of Boston, but O’Malley has said that the primary reason for foreign-language Masses is to enable worshipers to understand and participate in the liturgy, and not to preserve the culture of earlier generations. [If more Masses were in Latin, and people had hand Missals, many problems would be resolved.]
Lithuanian immigrants began arriving in the United States in the 1860s and established the Brockton parish, originally called St. Rocco, in 1898, according to the archdiocese. The parish, eventually renamed St. Casimir, in recent years had been dwindling, saw its school close, and last year had just one wedding, two funerals, and an average weekend Mass attendance of 161.
But the remaining parishioners were fiercely loyal. [Of course! Their grandparents made huge sacrifices to build these churches and decorate them for the proper worship of God. They received the sacraments in these churches!] In recent weeks, in a symbol associated with Lithuanian Catholicism, worshipers posted crosses in the lawn and gardens surrounding the church and attached them to the church’s fence. At yesterday’s closing Mass, parishioners held Lithuanian and American flags over an icon of St. Casimir during the final procession.
"In this time of trial, you have all tried your best to keep St. Casimir open," said the Rev. Henry Mair. "But the Holy Spirit has come to another conclusion."
Resentment toward the archdiocese bubbled through the morning’s sadness at a gloomy reception after the service. Some vowed never to forget a church they say was unfairly taken from them.
"I feel like I want to smack somebody," said Marilyn Yesonis. "We all went to the church. We paid the bills. The archdiocese has nothing to do with our parish." And Agnes Benoit, who lives next door to St. Casimir and has attended Mass there for 81 years, tapped her finger on a folding table as she said, simply, "This is my church."
The archdiocese says the St. Casimir community will be welcome now to attend St. Michael Church in Avon, and that the last Lithuanian parish in the archdiocese, St. Peter in South Boston, will help minister to the Lithuanian community.
In Boston, the reaction was mixed: Some worshipers were angry and said the archdiocese had betrayed them, while others were nostalgic. That parish was established in 1844 and the current building was constructed in 1877; there was a time when the parish had a school in Roxbury as well as a school and multiple ministries in the South End, but more recently its congregation, too, has dwindled.
"The memories just flood back," said John Doucette, 64, of Salisbury, who was an altar boy and a member of the drum and bugle corps at Holy Trinity in the 1950s, and returned yesterday to say goodbye. "But time goes on."
Michael Paulson can be reached at mpaulson@globe.com.





























There isn’t a church like it in the archdiocese. What a loss.
Sadly, the Cardinal has forbidden the FSSP and the Institute of Christ the King from the archdiocese. It is a perfect place for one of those two fraternities.
Comment by James — 1 July 2008 @ 10:17 amI am certainly sympathetic to the parishioners who don’t wish to see their parishes closed. But I also understand the realities of diocesan budgets and personnel shortages.
I remember one bishop who has since gone on to God saying that, faced with a shortage of priests in his diocese, he was tempted to make an announcement that any parish which had provided the diocese witha vocation to the priesthood in the past 20 years would be assured of having a pastor assigned for at least the next 20. Any parish that had not provided the diocese with a priest in 20 years was fair game for closing. Obviously, that’s an unworkable plan and one cannot fault a parish for not “producing” a priest, but it does put an interesting light on the situation. If we don’t have priests to staff our parishes, do we not share part of the blame? what have we done to encourage vocations? (Granted, of course, the fact that seminaries and vocation directors have done a pretty decent job for many years of actively and passively discouraging vocations, but we lay folks – especially contracepting parents – share some of the burden as well).
So, not knowing the full details of the situation in Boston, I can understand the pain and the anger and the sense of loss. In general, I am opposed to closing parishes as much as possible, but sometimes the reality simply cannot be ignored. If assigning a priest to a parish with 100 people coming to Sunday Mass means that another priest has to bear the burden of serving a parish with 3000 families all on his own, then something clearly needs to be done.
Comment by Tim Ferguson — 1 July 2008 @ 10:24 amThis stat tells it all. How can these churches support themselves if the last Mass (which I assume would draw more people than normal) had only 300 worshipers? While I’m sure many people are very sad, it doesn’t do any good to blame the Bishop. Hopefully the best can be made of this situation, like maybe moving the altar and iconography from the Holy Trinity to the Cathedral.
I don’t mean to downplay emotions. My grandmothers Church was recently closed in her diocese and just last week my pastor was promoted to the chancery on only 10 days notice. These types of changes are hard, and we shouldn’t downplay the emotions involved, but we also shouldn’t let those emotions lead us to resentment toward our bishops unless we have real evidence that the bishop is acting improperly.
Comment by Brian Walden — 1 July 2008 @ 10:25 amThe same thing happened in our diocese, in rural areas. One church which was closed had a very large, hand-carved reredos made by German craftsman out of dark oak. It was removed and sold. In another church, the pulpitum carved out of oak by craftsman depicted the twelve apostles. This was actually destroyed. A local priest offered to buy it, but was told it was already “firewood”. What is so tragic is that in several cases, farmers had left money in their wills—considerable amounts of their hard-earned money—to these parishes in order to keep them open. The money was taken by the diocese to pay for homosexual/pedophile settlements, sometimes against the wishes of the families of the deceased and the local community.”bullying”.
Parishes should considered incorporating privately, and not be part of the diocesan corporations. That is the only way to keep the buildings and interior furnishings. However, most of these parishes are inner city, and only the Latin Mass communities and elderly want them open. And such small communities probably do not have the resources. Of course, the newer, suburban churches have not been created for the Tridentine Mass, and most of us would not want to worship in buildings which look like gussied-up auction houses.
Thankfully, in our town, the TLM will be celebrated in the oldest church in the area, which is beautiful both inside and out. We only have a few weeks longer to wait.
Comment by Supertradmom — 1 July 2008 @ 10:27 amThere is a rarely-used alternative to church closure: Close the parish and sell the church to a group of motivated parishioners. Incorporate a repo clause in case the new owners do not properly maintain the building. Let the church continue to hold Masses.
This approach has worked to great success in St. Louis at the Shrine of St. Joseph (http://www.shrineofstjoseph.org) and to more modest success in Detroit at St. Albertus (http://www.stalbertus.org), the latter of which just hosted its second TLM this past Sunday.
Comment by AlexB — 1 July 2008 @ 10:33 amThis really is a terrible situation all the way round – and I know that some of it has to do with demographic shift, ridiculously huge settlement costs and the rising cause of caring for physical plants. However, I think the ‘necessity’ of Church closures has hidden within two important questions (probably even more)...
1) How has the Church dealt/has the Church dealt with rising payroll costs? That is to say, where there were once priests and religious doing quite a bit of the work at very low (no?) cost we now pay large staffs much higher wages (relatively speaking) because they have families. And often whe