Today, Fr. John Hunwicke of the Ordinariate has a terrific post which every priest and seminarian should read before Palm Sunday (that means “today”, right now as a matter of fact).
I won’t give you clippings. Take and read.
Today, Fr. John Hunwicke of the Ordinariate has a terrific post which every priest and seminarian should read before Palm Sunday (that means “today”, right now as a matter of fact).
I won’t give you clippings. Take and read.
Comments are closed.
Coat of Arms by D Burkart
St. John Eudes
- Prosper of Aquitaine (+c.455), De gratia Dei et libero arbitrio contra Collatorem 22.61
Nota bene: I do not answer these numbers or this Skype address. You won't get me "live". I check for messages regularly.
WDTPRS
020 8133 4535
651-447-6265
“He [Satan] will set up a counter-Church which will be the ape of the Church because, he the devil, is the ape of God. It will have all the notes and characteristics of the Church, but in reverse and emptied of its divine content. It will be a mystical body of the anti-Christ that will in all externals resemble the mystical body of Christ. In desperate need for God, whom he nevertheless refuses to adore, modern man in his loneliness and frustration will hunger more and more for membership in a community that will give him enlargement of purpose, but at the cost of losing himself in some vague collectivity.”
“Who is going to save our Church? Not our bishops, not our priests and religious. It is up to you, the people. You have the minds, the eyes, and the ears to save the Church. Your mission is to see that your priests act like priests, your bishops act like bishops.”
- Fulton Sheen
Therefore, ACTIVATE YOUR CONFIRMATION and get to work!
- C.S. Lewis
PLEASE subscribe via PayPal if it is useful. Zelle and Wise are better, but PayPal is convenient.
A monthly subscription donation means I have steady income I can plan on. I put you my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I often say Holy Mass.
In view of the rapidly changing challenges I now face, I would like to add more $10/month subscribers. Will you please help?
For a one time donation...
"But if, in any layman who is indeed imbued with literature, ignorance of the Latin language, which we can truly call the 'catholic' language, indicates a certain sluggishness in his love toward the Church, how much more fitting it is that each and every cleric should be adequately practiced and skilled in that language!" - Pius XI
"Let us realize that this remark of Cicero (Brutus 37, 140) can be in a certain way referred to [young lay people]: 'It is not so much a matter of distinction to know Latin as it is disgraceful not to know it.'" - St. John Paul II
Grant unto thy Church, we beseech Thee, O merciful God, that She, being gathered together by the Holy Ghost, may be in no wise troubled by attack from her foes. O God, who by sin art offended and by penance pacified, mercifully regard the prayers of Thy people making supplication unto Thee,and turn away the scourges of Thine anger which we deserve for our sins. Almighty and Everlasting God, in whose Hand are the power and the government of every realm: look down upon and help the Christian people that the heathen nations who trust in the fierceness of their own might may be crushed by the power of thine Arm. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world without end. R. Amen.
If you travel internationally, this is a super useful gizmo for your mobile internet data. I use one. If you get one through my link, I get data rewards.
Visits tracked by Statcounter since Sat., 25 Nov. 2006:
I assume Fr Z and I used the same Greek Lexicon (Liddell&Scott) in our theological studies. I currently use the Greek-English New Testament from Crossway in my Bible study sessions for our parish. The Greek “deipnon” means supper or evening meal. That meaning is consistent throughout the New Testament. The fact that some pagan practices associated a meal with sacrifice outside the New Testament is irrelevant. What is implied here is a logical flaw: deipnon means meal; meal was used for sacrifice; therefore meal is sacrificial in nature.
The entire New Testament has no reference to the Eucharist in the Christian community as a sacrifice. From the first reference in Paul’s letter to the Corinthians of the Eucharist as meal of remembrance through to the end of New Testament writings describing the earliest Christian communities, the emphasis is on preaching, teaching and community adherence to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The earliest witness to the Sunday Christian practice of weekly gathering is Justin Martyr in the mid-first century – where we have a presider and a description of the ritual.
The other witness we should recognize is that there is hardly any emphasis on Eucharist in the New Testament outside of Paul’s reference. And by the end of the New Testament writings (in the early 1st century) the Church structure consisted of overseer (bishop), presbyter (elder) and deacon (server). There is no priest at this point.
Today, I see the Novus Ordo as faithful to the Last Supper and the earliest Church practice: we gather as a community at a meal to do what Jesus commanded: do this in remembrance of me.
[Hunwicke is right. And there are three “levels” of Liddle & Scott (which is not the only reference for the NT).]
Thank you, Fr. Z, for your response. Your reference to “levels” of Liddell&Scott refers I assume to their latest edition and to their Logos software which takes the Greek of the New Testament and places each word usage in all of Greek literature and philosophy.
That still doesn’t show any relationship of “meal” to sacrifice in the New Testament. And the witness of the whole of the New Testament and historical references to the Eucharist at least through to Justin Martyr has no use of the leader/presider of Eucharist as priest offering sacrifice.
Bottom line – I believe Fr. Hunwicke is wrong. And what I think is happening here relative to interpretation of New Testament texts is eisegesis instead of exegesis.
[Hunwicke is right.]
The Passover Seder is sacrificial in nature, even if the Jews cannot sacrifice lambs anymore. (Samaritans still do.) All food was subject to various tithes or sacrifice during harvest or slaughter. Other meals were accompanied by prayers, ritual purification, and so on, and thus were liturgical in nature. Our custom of saying grace is related directly to this.
Every meal in the pagan ancient world was accompanied by libations and food sacrifices. All.meat came from temple slaughter. All crops were harvested according to pagan rituals.
Food was a matter of religion. So a supper was not just supper.
The logic here doesn’t bake sense. Our custom of grace before meals doesn’t make the meal a sacrifice. Therefore a supper is not just st a supper. If your position is that these Neal’s are a sacrifice without a priest we can go to women presiders easily.
The very connection joekstl says isn’t in the New Testament is made in 1 Cor 10:14-21.
Joekstl, recall that the memorium isn’t just a remembering. Once you unpack that, all will become clear.
One of my problems with much of Scriptural exegesis is that tends to isolate text from context.
A. In the Gospel of John:
1. Jesus is referred to as the Lamb of God.
2. He says that He is the Bread of Life, and those who eat His flesh and drink His Blood will have everlasting life.
3. He says that He is the Good Shepherd Who lays down His life for His sheep.
So we have Him identified as a Sacrificial animal, Who says he is a Shepherd Who will sacrifice Himself for His sheep, and we will eat His flesh and drink His blood.
There is also 1 Cor 5:7. Christ our passover has been immolated.
B. At the Jewish Passover the sacrifice happens before the meal.
The Eucharist is called the Lord’s Supper because that was when it was instituted. In fact, who thinks he has eaten supper after being given a wafer of bread? It is important to keep in mind that the institution of the Eucharist looks forward to a sacrifice that has not yet happened and to the Eschatological Divine Banquet.
Personally, I prefer the couplet Sacrament and Sacrifice to Meal and Sacrifice (or Sacrificial Meal).