Interesting. A Cardinal confirmed my daughter his morning, no mention. He did mention B16, which is nice…I don’t hold with some trads attacking his pontificate. It seems most disloyal. One’s father always has faults; only our Father in heaven is perfect.
I remember the day well, and I remember watching you on Fox News, Father, during the coverage of the election. It was great they asked you to contribute!
And, alas, the scandals finally ended. I was in Munich when he died. Every church bell was ringing! We rushed to the Frauenkirche and sat in the front row for the Rosary and Mass. The church was already full. The streets of Munich were like the running of the bulls in Pamplona. We were on the German news. It was incredible being in Europe for a Pontiff’s death. Very different from here. Every day after his death, the church bells would ring again at noon. There are so many churches in Munich, it was surreal.
My husband and I will never forget every moment of that day; it was my husband’s birthday and he had very mixed emotions about the Holy Father dying on his birthday. Between our house and our parish, which was 45 miles, the Papa passed away. When we walked into church the first thing I saw was a huge picture of him with flowers surrounding it. Well, I just lost it right then and there and it still brings tears to my eyes. Heck, for all the years he was Pope, I couldn’t watch him or listen to him without crying. There was something about him………. Also, since he passed there was a favor I was asking him for, and I received the favor through his intercession. ;0)
I also can’t think of him without crying. But I have a feeling my tears are flowing from a different spring, semperfi. My experience of his pontificate was far different from yours, I think.
PJPII was the pope when I became Catholic in 1985. I saw him 5 times in person on my trips here and there. But I didn’t belong to his “personality cult,” which was enormous and still is. After I became Catholic in 1985, I learned a whole lot that I hadn’t even realized when I came into the church. I’m still here and I intend to stay because the church is more than what it seems, regardless of the confusion and frustration of those years in the late 80s and 90s, when it seemed as though anything could happen and nearly everything was loss.
The church was nearly decimated in the last half of the 20th century, after WWII. The depth of the damage that was incurred is still not yet grasped by many people. We went from one disaster to another, glossing over the damage all the way because that’s what Catholics do. But damage always has consequences, even religious damage. We’ve seen that drag on and on and we’re nowhere near the end of that, I think.
A lot has been said about the papacy of PJPII, including that we needed the years of the PJPII pontificate to start to recover from the disorder of the 60s/70s. I don’t know what I think of that exactly, except that I don’t understand how engaging in disorder of your own sort is any remediation to disorder, in general. I didn’t see the logic of that then, and I don’t see it in retrospect either. I have no idea what kind of power a thing would have to have such that the pope himself could not deal with it rather like Benedict has.
I’m happier with the situation in the church now. She will hold up largely not because of the bishops but because of the fact that she is what she is, and because of the many courageous lay people who practice the faith in the only homely way they know how. And to some degree also to Benedict XVI. Nevertheless, huge damage has been done. The intellectual patrimony of the church lies in ruin like the skeleton of an old English cathedral, ceiling off and walls tumbling down. And so does her authority with it.
My fiancé came into the church that Easter. He had asked God to keep JP2 with us until he came into the Church. His prayer was answered. He was the only Pope I had ever known at that point. We cried on each others shoulders at the Mass our college Neuman Center held the day he died. We young people miss him greatly.
That day has been stamped on my mind, too.
I was working in the local Catholic bookstore then. We were incredibly busy, with people coming in to get all our framed pictures we had of him for their parish memorials. I was in the back office helping the boss with his paperwork, and we had the radio going, which gave out updates. A little after 3:30 our time, the bookkeeper said simply, ‘He’s gone…’ I looked down at my boss, and what really surprised me was that he made the sign of the cross, folded his hands and prayed briefly in silence, then blessed himself again! We were all very quiet the rest of the work day.
I remember going home in a rain and wind storm, and I stayed up until after midnight to watch the TV tributes (that weekend, as this one, the Final Four was going on, so everything on CBS was pushed back).
I still miss our Papa Giovanni Paulo Segundo (I just like the way it sounds in Italian!). Santo Subito! His beatification, which is coming soon, will be a huge event in Rome! Wish I could be there!
I believe JPII was very holy, but the pontificate is a mixed record. May he, however, intercede for us and for the whole Church.
A thought experiment: What if Joseph Ratzinger were elected in 1978? Off the top of my head, I am guessing that Paul VI already, by that time, made him Cardinal.
I’ve read that there has often been a period of disruption or at least uncertainty after an Ecumenical Council; given the near collapse of the modern West at the same time, I think we have no warrant to expect anything less than what happened — in my mind, as bad as it was, it could easily have been vastly worse. The Catholic Church still has a significant presence in the Anglosphere, and I’m not entirely sure that was a foregone conclusion.
I think judging JPII against BXVI is not really meaningful; their gifts were not in the same sphere. JPII was, I think, a good Pope – but one for that age, an age that was ending even in the last years of his pontificate. BXVI on the other hand I think is a Pope ‘for all time’.
@catholicmidwest: I do think there is something to the idea that JPII’s pontificate was exactly what was needed at that moment. He usually was extremely good at distinguishing between essentials and nonessentials; he did not really change anything, and did reaffirm important things that were under attack (eg the male-only priesthood in Ordinatio Sacerdotalis) . And his ‘Theology of the Body’ strikes me as really exceptional. I think he “got” something about how to address moderns and postmoderns that most do not; BXVI is in my mind the greater intellectual and theologian, but he isn’t reaching the culture the way JPII did.
Now, certainly he made a few mistakes (he was a bit over-ecumenical early on) but even that was corrected with Dominus Iesus. So I think — taking his pontificate *as a whole* rather than looking at the few but real flaws — it was really a very good thing.
The Church needs both the “JPII” and “BXVI” models, at least in this era.
I believe JPII was very holy, but the pontificate is a mixed record.
He inherited a huge mess. A thought experiment: What if Joseph Ratzinger were elected in 1978? Off the top of my head, I am guessing that Paul VI already, by that time, made him Cardinal.
Yes, he was already a Cardinal.
The Italians have a saying: Every epoch has its pope. 1978 wasn’t Ratzinger’s epoch.
Now, certainly he made a few mistakes (he was a bit over-ecumenical early on) but even that was corrected with Dominus Iesus. So I think — taking his pontificate *as a whole* rather than looking at the few but real flaws — it was really a very good thing.
Disagree. He was anything but ecumenical early in his pontificate. He didn’t turn to Ecumenism until after the fall of the Iron Curtain.
Much of JPII’s pontificate concerned European Unity. That was first manifest in his opposition to Communism. After the fall of Euro Communism, it was manifest in Ecumenism.
The death of John Paul the Great brought me to my senses and helped re-awaken my faith. They say his first miracle was all those who he brought back to the Church. I consider myself one of those. I love him for all of his faults and because of his holiness. He was THE right person for his time, just as Pope Benedict is the right Pope for his time. I will grieve just as much for Papa Benedict as I did for Papa John Paul.
True, it wasn’t THAT early. But the Assisi interreligious thing, which is often considered the really questionable bit, was 1986 … still before the fall of Communism.
True, it wasn’t THAT early. But the Assisi interreligious thing, which is often considered the really questionable bit, was 1986 … still before the fall of Communism.
I consider “overly ecumenical” to be when it precludes attention to liturgical or doctrinal matters. Assisi was a short term event that wasn’t all that significant.
After the fall of the Soviet Empire, however, JPII began to show a preference for Ecumenism over the reform of the Church.
I remember that my friends and I were planning on going to the basilica in town to pray for the Pope. When we heard that he had passed, we decided to go to the local church, as our college did not have a vigil Mass.
I also remember falling asleep to the sound of Cardinal Foley during the funeral Mass. It’s funny how these memories stick with you, but for most of my life, there had only been one pope.
Comments are closed.
SHOPPING ONLINE? Please, come here first!
Your use of my Amazon affiliate link is a major part of my income. It helps to pay for insurance, groceries, everything. Please remember me when shopping online. Thanks in advance.
“This blog is like a fusion of the Baroque ‘salon’ with its well-tuned harpsichord around which polite society gathered for entertainment and edification and, on the other hand, a Wild West “saloon” with its out-of-tune piano and swinging doors, where everyone has a gun and something to say. Nevertheless, we try to point our discussions back to what it is to be Catholic in this increasingly difficult age, to love God, and how to get to heaven.” – Fr. Z
Everyone, work to get this into your parish bulletins and diocesan papers.
The most evident mark of God’s anger and the most terrible castigation He can inflict upon the world are manifested when He permits His people to fall into the hands of clerics who are priests more in name than in deed, priests who practice the cruelty of ravening wolves rather than the charity and affection of devoted shepherds.
To donate monthly via Continue To Give use your phone's camera to activate the Q code or text 4827563 to 715-803-4772 (US) for a link.
For Zelle and Chase, etc., use
frz AT wdtprs DOT com.
Daily Quiz
Use FATHERZ10 at checkout for 10% off
Donate using VENMO
GREAT BEER from Traditional Benedictine Monks in Italy
CLICK and say your daily offerings!
A Daily Prayer for Priests
Do you have a faithful Catholic website that needs competent and reliable tech support?
NEW OPPORTUNITY – 10% off with code: FATHERZ10
Fr. Z’s VOICEMAIL
Nota bene: I do not answer these numbers or this Skype address. You won't get me "live". I check for messages regularly.
WDTPRS
020 8133 4535
651-447-6265
Books which you must have.
This REALLY helps! And it’s great coffee (and tea)
I use this when I travel both in these USA and abroad. Very useful. Fast enough for Zoom. I connect my DMR (ham radio) through it. If you use my link, they give me more data. A GREAT back up.
“He [Satan] will set up a counter-Church which will be the ape of the Church because, he the devil, is the ape of God. It will have all the notes and characteristics of the Church, but in reverse and emptied of its divine content. It will be a mystical body of the anti-Christ that will in all externals resemble the mystical body of Christ. In desperate need for God, whom he nevertheless refuses to adore, modern man in his loneliness and frustration will hunger more and more for membership in a community that will give him enlargement of purpose, but at the cost of losing himself in some vague collectivity.”
“Who is going to save our Church? Not our bishops, not our priests and religious. It is up to you, the people. You have the minds, the eyes, and the ears to save the Church. Your mission is to see that your priests act like priests, your bishops act like bishops.”
“The modern habit of doing ceremonial things unceremoniously is no proof of humility; rather it proves the offender's inability to forget himself in the rite, and his readiness to spoil for every one else the proper pleasure of ritual.”
- C.S. Lewis
This blog has to earn its keep!
PLEASE subscribe via PayPal if it is useful.
That way I have steady income I can plan on, and you wind up regularly on my list of benefactors for whom I pray and for whom I periodically say Holy Mass.
In view of the rapidly changing challenges I now face, I would like to add more $10/month subscribers. Will you please help?
For a one time donation...
As for Latin…
"But if, in any layman who is indeed imbued with literature, ignorance of the Latin language, which we can truly call the 'catholic' language, indicates a certain sluggishness in his love toward the Church, how much more fitting it is that each and every cleric should be adequately practiced and skilled in that language!" - Pius XI
"Let us realize that this remark of Cicero (Brutus 37, 140) can be in a certain way referred to [young lay people]: 'It is not so much a matter of distinction to know Latin as it is disgraceful not to know it.'" - St. John Paul II
Grant unto thy Church, we beseech Thee, O merciful God, that She, being gathered together by the Holy Ghost, may be in no wise troubled by attack from her foes. O God, who by sin art offended and by penance pacified, mercifully regard the prayers of Thy people making supplication unto Thee,and turn away the scourges of Thine anger which we deserve for our sins. Almighty and Everlasting God, in whose Hand are the power and the government of every realm: look down upon and help the Christian people that the heathen nations who trust in the fierceness of their own might may be crushed by the power of thine Arm. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world without end. R. Amen.
Be a “Zed-Head”!
CHALLENGE COINS!
My "challenge coin" for my 25th anniversary of ordination in 2016.
Want one? I do exchanges with military and LEOs, etc.
This is really useful when travelling… and also when you aren’t and you need backup internet NOW! I use this for my DMR “Zednet” hotspot when I’m mobile. It’s a ham radio thing.
If you travel internationally, this is a super useful gizmo for your mobile internet data. I use one. If you get one through my link, I get data rewards.
Please use my links when shopping! I depend on your help.
"Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a traditionalist blogger who has never shied from picking fights with priests, bishops or cardinals when liturgical abuses are concerned."
- Kractivism
"Father John Zuhlsdorf is a crank" "Father Zuhlsdorf drives me crazy" "the hate-filled Father John Zuhlsford" [sic] "Father John Zuhlsdorf, the right wing priest who has a penchant for referring to NCR as the 'fishwrap'"
"Zuhlsdorf is an eccentric with no real consequences" - HERE
- Michael Sean Winters
"Fr Z is a true phenomenon of the information age: a power blogger and a priest."
- Anna Arco
“Given that Rorate Coeli and Shea are mad at Fr. Z, I think it proves Fr. Z knows what he is doing and he is right.”
- Comment
"Let me be clear. Fr. Z is a shock jock, mostly. His readership is vast and touchy. They like to be provoked and react with speed and fury."
- Sam Rocha
"Father Z’s Blog is a bright star on a cloudy night."
- Comment
"A cross between Kung Fu Panda and Wolverine."
- Anonymous
Fr. Z is officially a hybrid of Gandalf and Obi-Wan XD
- Comment
Rev. John Zuhlsdorf, a scrappy blogger popular with the Catholic right.
- America Magazine
RC integralist who prays like an evangelical fundamentalist.
-Austen Ivereigh on Twitter
[T]he even more mainline Catholic Fr. Z. blog.
-Deus Ex Machina
“For me the saddest thing about Father Z’s blog is how cruel it is.... It’s astonishing to me that a priest could traffic in such cruelty and hatred.”
- Jesuit homosexualist James Martin to BuzzFeed
"Fr. Z's is one of the more cheerful blogs out there and he is careful about keeping the crazies out of his commboxes"
- Paul in comment at 1 Peter 5
"I am a Roman Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
I am a TLM-going Catholic, in no small part, because of your blog.
And I am in a state of grace today, in no small part, because of your blog."
- Tom in comment
"Thank you for the delightful and edifying omnibus that is your blog."- Reader comment.
"Fr. Z disgraces his priesthood as a grifter, a liar, and a bully. - - Mark Shea
And the 112th anniversary of the Ven. Pius XII’s ordination.
Interesting. A Cardinal confirmed my daughter his morning, no mention. He did mention B16, which is nice…I don’t hold with some trads attacking his pontificate. It seems most disloyal. One’s father always has faults; only our Father in heaven is perfect.
Santo subito!
I remember the day well, and I remember watching you on Fox News, Father, during the coverage of the election. It was great they asked you to contribute!
…and the 6th anniversary of my 10th birthday!
And, alas, the scandals finally ended. I was in Munich when he died. Every church bell was ringing! We rushed to the Frauenkirche and sat in the front row for the Rosary and Mass. The church was already full. The streets of Munich were like the running of the bulls in Pamplona. We were on the German news. It was incredible being in Europe for a Pontiff’s death. Very different from here. Every day after his death, the church bells would ring again at noon. There are so many churches in Munich, it was surreal.
Requiescat in pace.
I will remember to pray for him at my adoration hour later.
Requiescat in pace, Ioannes Paulus PP. II
I will pray for him.
Ioannes Paule Magne, ora pro nobis!
His beatification in a few weeks time will be a great event. 2 million persons expected in Rome.
My husband and I will never forget every moment of that day; it was my husband’s birthday and he had very mixed emotions about the Holy Father dying on his birthday. Between our house and our parish, which was 45 miles, the Papa passed away. When we walked into church the first thing I saw was a huge picture of him with flowers surrounding it. Well, I just lost it right then and there and it still brings tears to my eyes. Heck, for all the years he was Pope, I couldn’t watch him or listen to him without crying. There was something about him………. Also, since he passed there was a favor I was asking him for, and I received the favor through his intercession. ;0)
I also can’t think of him without crying. But I have a feeling my tears are flowing from a different spring, semperfi. My experience of his pontificate was far different from yours, I think.
PJPII was the pope when I became Catholic in 1985. I saw him 5 times in person on my trips here and there. But I didn’t belong to his “personality cult,” which was enormous and still is. After I became Catholic in 1985, I learned a whole lot that I hadn’t even realized when I came into the church. I’m still here and I intend to stay because the church is more than what it seems, regardless of the confusion and frustration of those years in the late 80s and 90s, when it seemed as though anything could happen and nearly everything was loss.
The church was nearly decimated in the last half of the 20th century, after WWII. The depth of the damage that was incurred is still not yet grasped by many people. We went from one disaster to another, glossing over the damage all the way because that’s what Catholics do. But damage always has consequences, even religious damage. We’ve seen that drag on and on and we’re nowhere near the end of that, I think.
A lot has been said about the papacy of PJPII, including that we needed the years of the PJPII pontificate to start to recover from the disorder of the 60s/70s. I don’t know what I think of that exactly, except that I don’t understand how engaging in disorder of your own sort is any remediation to disorder, in general. I didn’t see the logic of that then, and I don’t see it in retrospect either. I have no idea what kind of power a thing would have to have such that the pope himself could not deal with it rather like Benedict has.
I’m happier with the situation in the church now. She will hold up largely not because of the bishops but because of the fact that she is what she is, and because of the many courageous lay people who practice the faith in the only homely way they know how. And to some degree also to Benedict XVI. Nevertheless, huge damage has been done. The intellectual patrimony of the church lies in ruin like the skeleton of an old English cathedral, ceiling off and walls tumbling down. And so does her authority with it.
May the Lord grant him blessed repose and eternal memory!
My fiancé came into the church that Easter. He had asked God to keep JP2 with us until he came into the Church. His prayer was answered. He was the only Pope I had ever known at that point. We cried on each others shoulders at the Mass our college Neuman Center held the day he died. We young people miss him greatly.
That day has been stamped on my mind, too.
I was working in the local Catholic bookstore then. We were incredibly busy, with people coming in to get all our framed pictures we had of him for their parish memorials. I was in the back office helping the boss with his paperwork, and we had the radio going, which gave out updates. A little after 3:30 our time, the bookkeeper said simply, ‘He’s gone…’ I looked down at my boss, and what really surprised me was that he made the sign of the cross, folded his hands and prayed briefly in silence, then blessed himself again! We were all very quiet the rest of the work day.
I remember going home in a rain and wind storm, and I stayed up until after midnight to watch the TV tributes (that weekend, as this one, the Final Four was going on, so everything on CBS was pushed back).
I still miss our Papa Giovanni Paulo Segundo (I just like the way it sounds in Italian!). Santo Subito! His beatification, which is coming soon, will be a huge event in Rome! Wish I could be there!
I believe JPII was very holy, but the pontificate is a mixed record. May he, however, intercede for us and for the whole Church.
A thought experiment: What if Joseph Ratzinger were elected in 1978? Off the top of my head, I am guessing that Paul VI already, by that time, made him Cardinal.
I’ve read that there has often been a period of disruption or at least uncertainty after an Ecumenical Council; given the near collapse of the modern West at the same time, I think we have no warrant to expect anything less than what happened — in my mind, as bad as it was, it could easily have been vastly worse. The Catholic Church still has a significant presence in the Anglosphere, and I’m not entirely sure that was a foregone conclusion.
I think judging JPII against BXVI is not really meaningful; their gifts were not in the same sphere. JPII was, I think, a good Pope – but one for that age, an age that was ending even in the last years of his pontificate. BXVI on the other hand I think is a Pope ‘for all time’.
@catholicmidwest: I do think there is something to the idea that JPII’s pontificate was exactly what was needed at that moment. He usually was extremely good at distinguishing between essentials and nonessentials; he did not really change anything, and did reaffirm important things that were under attack (eg the male-only priesthood in Ordinatio Sacerdotalis) . And his ‘Theology of the Body’ strikes me as really exceptional. I think he “got” something about how to address moderns and postmoderns that most do not; BXVI is in my mind the greater intellectual and theologian, but he isn’t reaching the culture the way JPII did.
Now, certainly he made a few mistakes (he was a bit over-ecumenical early on) but even that was corrected with Dominus Iesus. So I think — taking his pontificate *as a whole* rather than looking at the few but real flaws — it was really a very good thing.
The Church needs both the “JPII” and “BXVI” models, at least in this era.
Mike says:
I believe JPII was very holy, but the pontificate is a mixed record.
He inherited a huge mess.
A thought experiment: What if Joseph Ratzinger were elected in 1978? Off the top of my head, I am guessing that Paul VI already, by that time, made him Cardinal.
Yes, he was already a Cardinal.
The Italians have a saying: Every epoch has its pope. 1978 wasn’t Ratzinger’s epoch.
abiologistforlife says:
Now, certainly he made a few mistakes (he was a bit over-ecumenical early on) but even that was corrected with Dominus Iesus. So I think — taking his pontificate *as a whole* rather than looking at the few but real flaws — it was really a very good thing.
Disagree. He was anything but ecumenical early in his pontificate. He didn’t turn to Ecumenism until after the fall of the Iron Curtain.
Much of JPII’s pontificate concerned European Unity. That was first manifest in his opposition to Communism. After the fall of Euro Communism, it was manifest in Ecumenism.
The death of John Paul the Great brought me to my senses and helped re-awaken my faith. They say his first miracle was all those who he brought back to the Church. I consider myself one of those. I love him for all of his faults and because of his holiness. He was THE right person for his time, just as Pope Benedict is the right Pope for his time. I will grieve just as much for Papa Benedict as I did for Papa John Paul.
True, it wasn’t THAT early. But the Assisi interreligious thing, which is often considered the really questionable bit, was 1986 … still before the fall of Communism.
abiologistforlife says:
True, it wasn’t THAT early. But the Assisi interreligious thing, which is often considered the really questionable bit, was 1986 … still before the fall of Communism.
I consider “overly ecumenical” to be when it precludes attention to liturgical or doctrinal matters. Assisi was a short term event that wasn’t all that significant.
After the fall of the Soviet Empire, however, JPII began to show a preference for Ecumenism over the reform of the Church.
I remember that my friends and I were planning on going to the basilica in town to pray for the Pope. When we heard that he had passed, we decided to go to the local church, as our college did not have a vigil Mass.
I also remember falling asleep to the sound of Cardinal Foley during the funeral Mass. It’s funny how these memories stick with you, but for most of my life, there had only been one pope.