WDTPRS – Palm Sunday: an example so perfect that it has the power to transform us

Palm Sunday marks the beginning of Holy Week.  The Sacred Triduum (triduum from tres dies – “three day space”) were once days of obligation when people were freed from servile work so that they could attend the liturgies, once celebrated in the morning.  In the 17th century, however, the obligation was removed under the influence of changing social and religious conditions.  As a result, the faithful lost sight of these beautiful liturgies and in general only priests and religious in monasteries knew them.

In 1951 Pope Pius XII began to restore the Triduum liturgies to prominence by mandating that the Easter Vigil be celebrated in the evening.  In 1953 Mass was permitted in the evening on certain days.  A reformed Ordo for Holy Week was issued in 1955 and took effect on 25 March 1956.   That is when the Sunday of Holy Week came to be called “The Second Sunday in Passiontide, or Palm Sunday”.  Matins and Lauds (Tenebrae, “shadows”) was to be sung in the morning.  Holy Thursday Mass was not to begin before 5 p.m. and no later than 8 p.m.  The idea was to make it easier for people to attend these all important liturgies.

The principal ceremonies of the Palm Sunday Mass include the blessing of palm branches (or olive branches in some parts of the world, such as Rome) and a procession around and into the church.  In the present Missale Romanum an interesting rubric about the procession harkens to ancient times:

“At a suitable hour the “collect” is made (fit collecta)in a lesser church or in another appropriate place outside the church toward which the procession marches.”

Here is our word “collect” used to describe a gathering of people.

Also in the rubrics there is something helpful for our understanding of “active participation”:

“Then as is customary the priest greets the people; and then there is given a brief admonition, by which the faithful are invited to participate actively and consciously (actuose et conscie participandam) in this day’s celebration.”

Those words actuose et conscie are very important.  The Second Vatican Council, when using the term actuosa participatio or “active participation”, meant mainly interior participation, the engaging of the mind, heart and will.  The Council Fathers did not mean primarily exterior participation.  Exterior participation should be the natural result of interior participation: we seek to express outwardly what we are experiencing within.  While the two influence each other, there is a logical priority to interior participation, which is by far the more important.

At the end of the procession, when everyone is gathered in the church, the priest says the…

Omnipotens sempiterne Deus,
qui humano generi, ad imitandum humilitatis exemplum,
Salvatorem nostrum carnem sumere
et crucem subire fecisti,
concede propitius,
ut et patientiae ipsius habere documenta
et resurrectionis consortia mereamur.

The vocabulary of today’s Collect is incredibly complex.  We can only scratch at a fraction of what is there.

Our prayer was in older editions of the Missale Romanum and, before them, in the Gelasian Sacramentary.  In the Gelasian there is an extra helpful et: Salvatorem nostrum et carnem sumere, et crucem subire.  Wonderfully alliterative!  The editor of the Gelasian excludes a comma, which makes sense to me: qui humano generi_ ad imitandum…. There may be a touch of St. Augustine’s (+430) influence in the prayer.  In Augustine humilitatis appears with exemplum on close conjunction with documentum (ep. 194.3) and with documentum and patientiae in proximity to exemplum (en. ps. 29 en. 2.7).  In the context of the Passion Augustine says: “Therefore, the Lord Himself, judge of the living and the dead, stands before a human judge (Pilate), offering us a decisive lesson of humility and patience (humilitatis et patientiae documentum), not defeated, but giving the soldier an example of how one wages war (pugnandi exemplum): …”

There are two words for “example” here: exemplum…documenta. These words appear together in numerous classical and patristic texts. Our startlingly useful Lewis & Short Dictionary informs us that our old friend exemplum means, “a sample for imitation, instruction, proof, a pattern, model, original, example….”  Exemplum is a term in ancient rhetoric, an inseparable part of the warp and weft of the development of Christian doctrine during the first millennium.

For Fathers of the Church, all well-trained in rhetoric (how we need those skills today), exemplum identified a range of things including man as God’s image, Christ as a Teacher, and the content of prophecy.   In Greek and Roman rhetoric and philosophy, an exemplum could have auctoritas, “authority”, the persuasive force of an argument.  When we hear today’s prayer with ancient ears, exemplum is not merely an “example” to be followed: it indicates a past event with such authoritative force that it transforms him who imitates it.  Today we hear humilitatis exemplum, the authoritative model of humility who is Christ – Christ in action, or rather Christ in Passion, undergoing His sufferings for our sake.  This becomes the foundational and authoritative pattern of the Christian experience: self-emptying in the Incarnation and Passion leading to resurrection.   Exemplum is augmented later in the prayer by documentaDocumentum is also a “pattern for imitation” like exemplum but also in some contexts having the meaning of “a proof”, that is, a concrete demonstration that what is asserted is true: evidence.   In this case it is a paradigm after which we are to pattern and shape our own lives.  But this pattern or model itself actually has power to shape us.  Christ transforms us the baptized who are made in his image and likeness, after his perfect exemplum, and who imitate His exempla and documenta, His words and deeds.

Consortium (from con-sors… having the same lot/fate/destiny with something or someone) classically is a “community of goods” and “fellowship, participation, society.”

Habere has a vast entry in the L&S. The common meaning is “have”, but it also indicates concepts like “hold, account, esteem, consider, regard” as well as “have as a habit, peculiarity, or characteristic.”  Habere is doing double-duty with two objects, documenta and consortia. This is why I use both “grasp” for the first application of habere and “have” for the second.  The meanings of the two different objects draw our two different senses of habere.

Patientia is from patior, “to bear, support, undergo, suffer, endure”, and it carries all its connotations as well as the meaning “patience”.  This is where the word “Passion” comes from.  Today is Second Passion Sunday.  We could say here, “examples of His long-suffering” or “exemplary patterns of His patient forbearance.”  Finally, note that nostrum goes with Salvatorem and not with carnem: caro, carnis is feminine and the form would have to have been nostram carnem.

Almighty eternal God,
who, for the human race,
made our Savior both assume flesh and undergo the Cross
for an example of humility to be imitated,
graciously grant,
that we may be worthy to grasp both the lessons of His forbearance
and also shares in the resurrection.

Almighty, ever-living God,
you have given the human race Jesus Christ our Savior,
as a model of humility.
He fulfilled your will
by becoming man and giving his life on the cross.
Help us to bear witness to you
by following his example of suffering
and make us worthy to share in his resurrection

Almighty ever-living God,
who as an example of humility for the human race to follow
caused our Savior to take flesh and submit to the Cross,
graciously grant that we may heed his lesson of patient suffering
and so merit a share in his Resurrection

More can be said about that phrase patientiae ipsiusIpse, a demonstrative pronoun, is emphatic and means “himself, herself, itself”.  Could we personify patientia to mean, “grasp the lessons of Patience itself” or even “of Patience Himself”?   That would be poetically sublime.

In the fullness of time the Second Person of the Trinity, God the Son, the eternal Word through whom all things visible and invisible were made, by the will of the Father emptied Himself of His glory and took our human nature up into an indestructible bond with His own divinity.  He came to us sinners to save us from our sins and teach us who we are (cf. Gaudium et spes 22).  This saving mission began with self-emptying (in Greek kenosis).

Fathom for a moment the humility of the Savior, emptying Himself of His divine splendor, submitting Himself to His humble and hidden life before His public ministry.   When the time of His years and His mission was complete He gave Himself over again, emptying Himself yet again even to giving up His very life.   Every moment of Jesus earthly life, every word and deed, are conditioned by humility.   This is our perfect example to follow, an example so perfect that it has the power to transform us.

As Holy Week begins and the Sacred Triduum is observed, come to the sacramental observance of the sacred and saving mysteries with humble self-emptying.  Make room for Christ.

About Fr. John Zuhlsdorf

Fr. Z is the guy who runs this blog. o{]:¬)
This entry was posted in LENT, SESSIUNCULA, WDTPRS and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.


  1. Mike says:

    Thanks for this, Fr. Z.
    Tomorrrow, my two sons and I will attend our first Palm Sunday in the EF, at St. John the Beloved Parish, McLean, VA. Your reflections help quite a bit!

  2. Maltese says:

    “Fathom for a moment the humility of the Savior, emptying Himself of His divine splendor, submitting Himself to His humble and hidden life before His public ministry. When the time of His years and His mission was complete He gave Himself over again, emptying Himself yet again even to giving up His very life. Every moment of Jesus earthly life, every word and deed, are conditioned by humility. This is our perfect example to follow, an example so perfect that it has the power to transform us.”

    Beautiful and sublime, Father, thank you for that!

  3. kallman says:

    You have clearly avoided mentioning the fact that the Pius XII changes to the Triduum were actually the work of Bugnini the Freemason, these things having been done by stealth and surprise and with much secretiveness and skullduggery at the time. More convenient times for ceremonies was not the main thrust of the changes in the mind of Annibale, but rather a way of advancing the agenda of the Liturgical Movement. His plotting commenced no later than 1948 for this and perhaps much sooner

  4. Mike says:

    Well, Kallman, Bugnini’s intentions not withstanding, the changes as far as I can see were good.

    Anyone for Easter Vigil in the morning?

  5. Henry Edwards says:

    Today’s Latin Collect being the same in both the OF and the EF, here for comparison is the English translation provided in both the Angelus Press and the Baronius Press 1962 missals:

    O almighty and everlasting God,
    who didst cause our Saviour to take upon Him our flesh and to undergo the cross,
    for an example of humility to be imitated by mankind:
    mercifully grant that we may deserve to possess not only the lesson of His patience,
    but also the fellowship of His Resurrection.

  6. HighMass says:

    Praise Be Jesus Christ! For the First time in 45 yrs the area we live in we will have Palm Sunday mass in The E.F. Yes Even found a Red Cope for the Procession, first part of the liturgy….

    The Antiphons that will be sung the “All Glory Laud and Honor” in Latin……..etc.
    First we must Thank Almighty GOD for this Gift and then our DEAR DEAR POPE……..how can we let Pope Benedict know how much he is loved?????

    What a Gift, the Easter Triduim (sp?) of course in the N.O. we continue to pray that some day we will have all the liturgies of Holy Week in the E.F. but for know must be on bended knee in thanksgiving…..

  7. 3D says:

    kallmen, you are right.

    I suppose we can’t be absolutely certain about Bugnini and Freemasonry, but certainly we lost a treasure in the true traditional Holy Week rites of the Church. I have been able to see the pre-1951 versions, and it’s a memory that I shall always cherish.

    Unfortunately, some, like perhaps those on this blog, claim that it is wrong to use these versions, and they are spoiling it for the rest of us. They forget that Blessed John XXIII had no scruples about using the Pre-Bugnini Holy Week rites.

  8. Texan Traditionalist says:


    As Kallman stated, the change in time for the various solemnities was nothing more than a false pretense to enter into a total reformation of the rites of Holy Week. The changes made by Bugnini in the 1950s are light-years beyond a mere change in the hour of celebration. In fact, an indult was given in 1951 (I believe) to allow the celebration of the pre-Bugnini Holy Week rites during the new evening hours, ad experimentum. I encourage you to read the exemplary series by the New Liturgical Movement blog on this issue. I firmly believe that as time goes on and resistance to the liturgical patrimony of the Church continues to thaw, this will be an issue that will (and needs) to be addressed.

    Here is NLM’s 9-Part series on the Pius XII’s Holy Week revisions:


    May you all have a blessed Palm Sunday!

  9. rfox2 says:

    Thank you, Father, for this extended look at the Triduum prayers. The prayers of the Triduum that we celebrate this week are not only beautiful, but essential for the life of the Church. If it’s true that all of the sacraments have as their basis Good Friday, it’s essential for the Church to take significant time to pray the Triduum.

    On another note, you wrote, quoting Vatican II: “Those words actuose et conscie are very important. The Second Vatican Council, when using the term actuosa participatio or ‘active participation’, meant mainly interior participation, the engaging of the mind, heart and will.” I agree that this is the primarily valid and orthodox way to interpret this teaching of the Second Vatican Council. However, if this is how this teaching is meant to be interpreted, does the emphasis on “active and conscious” mean that the Council Fathers thought that people were not participating by “engaging the mind, heart, and will” prior to Vatican II? Or, that somehow the “active and conscious” participation of the faithful was deficient?

    I would argue that what the Council Fathers intended, at the advice of their erudite periti, was something more akin to the “experimental” dialog Mass that was being said at the time, so that the Mass could be more “phenomenologically apparent”, and “existentially meaningful”. It would be absurd to say that for the centuries prior to Vatican II, the faithful were not participating via “the engaging of the mind, heart and will”. Of the two interpretations, the latter seems more plausible, namely that these “active participation” comments are periti inspired in order to focus on the external and visible, and less on the invisible reality of the Mass.

Comments are closed.